Spilt lanes, yay or nay?

Gandorlf
Posts
537
Joined
6/17/2016
Location
GB
Thoughts? I was watching Toronto 2014 and remembered they had a split lane. Made the racing interesting but I don't remember seeing one since.
1
|
9/24/2018 3:33am
I like them. Something a little different
3
1
PRM31
Posts
3707
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
Northern, VA, USA
Fantasy
9/24/2018 3:35am
Nay.
3
Ramrod
Posts
4996
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ontario, CA
9/24/2018 4:22am
Yay.
1
9/24/2018 4:39am
I think one of the rounds had a split whoop section too? It was early 2000's anyway.

The Shop

9/24/2018 4:57am
Splitting lanes used to save me a ton of time commuting when I lived in California. It blows my mind that this is illegal everywhere else.
8
Donovan759
Posts
2089
Joined
10/12/2017
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
9/24/2018 5:04am
This would have been a good poll.

I like them. Its something different.
2
1
9/24/2018 5:05am
They just need to test them and make changes if one lane is noticeably faster
3
tingo
Posts
1194
Joined
8/16/2016
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
9/24/2018 5:15am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2018 5:15am
Gandorlf wrote:
Thoughts? I was watching Toronto 2014 and remembered they had a split lane. Made the racing interesting but I don't remember seeing one since.
It was James Stewart, not the split lanes, that made 2014 Toronto interesting.

I like them on occasion.
3
9/24/2018 5:32am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2018 5:34am
Conceptually they're ok, but with the rise of GPS data analytics, I think their use has become somewhat obsoleted. Top guys are trying to nail the established fast line lap after lap.
4
9/24/2018 5:34am
The idea is good, but in practice they're bad for racing. With litpro they know after first practice which side is faster and that's that for the night. Nobody will take the slower side so you're effectively cutting track width in half making it even harder to pass on.
4
BobKerr
Posts
910
Joined
11/3/2017
Location
Nowheresville, TN, USA
9/24/2018 6:19am
Yay, but they need to modify the 'faster lane' to slow it down just a little as the night goes on to make the racing more interesting and force the riders to try the 'slower lane'. I know that would be hard to do though. I guess I like them in theory.
c0ncEpT
Posts
1317
Joined
5/13/2015
Location
Harrison Twp., MI, USA
9/24/2018 7:10am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2018 7:19am
Split lanes are a tough thing to get behind. One lane is ALWAYS faster.

Sometimes you can get into a situation where the faster lane gets deep and chopped out and the slower lane will become faster as the moto goes on. I feel like that rarely happens tho.
1
KennyT
Posts
4399
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Vista, CA, USA
Fantasy
9/24/2018 7:49am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2018 7:49am
I’m okay with them at 1 or 2 rounds but don’t think they belong n every race. Like others have said, 1 lane will be quicker than the other. If that’s the case then the option lane would only come into play if lappers were involved
Mx 117
Posts
21
Joined
8/31/2018
Location
Red Lion, PA, USA
9/24/2018 8:27am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2018 8:27am
Minneapolis triple crown had a split lane where no one used the outside until feld added a small roller on the inside lane, before the last main, without telling anyone. Split lanes are so hard to manage.
Mr. Info
Posts
1671
Joined
5/3/2010
Location
Perris, CA, USA
9/24/2018 8:30am
NAY
1
FuzzyLogic
Posts
288
Joined
5/18/2018
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
9/24/2018 8:33am
I think they are cool idea, but as most have pointed out, it doesn't take long for everyone to figure out which one is the best / fastest. Maybe throughout the night Feld instructs the track crew to not touch whichever side is seeming to get more use. This would at least make a rider think about it and maybe switch it up mid race if the "faster" side is getting real beat up and rutty.
pbody
Posts
350
Joined
12/9/2014
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
9/24/2018 8:40am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2018 2:53pm
mx_phreek wrote:
The idea is good, but in practice they're bad for racing. With litpro they know after first practice which side is faster and that's that for...
The idea is good, but in practice they're bad for racing. With litpro they know after first practice which side is faster and that's that for the night. Nobody will take the slower side so you're effectively cutting track width in half making it even harder to pass on.
Agreed. I think the only way to go about split lanes is to make the lanes technical and slow, perhaps with some type of a speed control obstacle. Something where a mistake is likely and you have to decide what option would would cost the least amount of time.
1
loftyair
Posts
2904
Joined
7/3/2009
Location
riverside, CA, USA
9/24/2018 8:43am
Make the track half wide? Screw that! Wider is better...
1
ga_pike
Posts
2650
Joined
7/14/2011
Location
Valdosta, GA, USA
9/24/2018 9:39am
I'm a fan of split lanes. I know there is an advantage lane... but if you do a rhythm vs whoops lane, it might even out for some guys.
1
mxrider971
Posts
118
Joined
5/24/2015
Location
Francestown, NH, USA
9/24/2018 10:09am
ga_pike wrote:
I'm a fan of split lanes. I know there is an advantage lane... but if you do a rhythm vs whoops lane, it might even out...
I'm a fan of split lanes. I know there is an advantage lane... but if you do a rhythm vs whoops lane, it might even out for some guys.
Now that’s a split lane I’d like to see, whoops on one side and a rhythm on the other.
9/24/2018 12:25pm
Split lanes are fine, but when one line becomes quicker it turns into an even more one lined section.
1
9/24/2018 12:31pm
Split lanes are fine, but when one line becomes quicker it turns into an even more one lined section.
This is exactly what went through my head. If one side is faster than the other, you have everyone switching to one line and have eliminated half of the track in that section which equals one lined with zero passing.
mark_swart
Posts
2523
Joined
11/2/2011
Location
Chapin, SC, USA
9/24/2018 2:12pm
I don't know if you are talking for professional racing only, but they are definitely nice when designed properly at local tracks.
1
HackMan162
Posts
534
Joined
2/16/2007
Location
Austin, TX, USA
9/24/2018 2:28pm
I remember when Anaheim had a split lane first turn one year. During the main, which was a good Reed/KW battle, the "fast" line changed as the main evolved. That one seemed to be done correctly.
1
Gandorlf
Posts
537
Joined
6/17/2016
Location
GB
9/24/2018 2:49pm
Conceptually they're ok, but with the rise of GPS data analytics, I think their use has become somewhat obsoleted. Top guys are trying to nail the...
Conceptually they're ok, but with the rise of GPS data analytics, I think their use has become somewhat obsoleted. Top guys are trying to nail the established fast line lap after lap.
That's a great point. I never thought of that but yeah I guess with all the data they're obsolete now!
Gandorlf
Posts
537
Joined
6/17/2016
Location
GB
9/24/2018 2:50pm
Gandorlf wrote:
Thoughts? I was watching Toronto 2014 and remembered they had a split lane. Made the racing interesting but I don't remember seeing one since.
tingo wrote:
It was James Stewart, not the split lanes, that made 2014 Toronto interesting.

I like them on occasion.
Haha very true one of the reasons I watched that race again. Poetry in motion.
Gandorlf
Posts
537
Joined
6/17/2016
Location
GB
9/24/2018 2:52pm
I think I'm in the obsolete due to data camp. Unless like someone already stated maybe a whoops/rhythm section split would be awesome.
jeffro503
Posts
27635
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
9/24/2018 8:03pm
It's a Yay for me. I dig em' , as it gives guys going side by side different options.

Post a reply to: Spilt lanes, yay or nay?

The Latest