Steve's rant of the week on Pulp MX on the SX TV broadcast!

Frank
Posts
642
Joined
12/29/2012
Location
USA
10/30/2018 9:15pm
Live coverage is not important to me since the majority of events are PST time zone. I watch the races on sunday morning and fast forward through everything except the mains. Takes under 30min to view the 3hr program. I could care less what they do to occupy the other 2hr 30min each week. As many have mentioned supercross is no longer a motorsport as much as it is a show.
1
BikeGuy321
Posts
427
Joined
9/25/2018
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
10/30/2018 11:09pm
The racing is great but Ralph and Jeff kind of kill it for me, I'm not gonna lie. I nominate Weege and GL or Weege and Todd Harris to replace those two. Jeff can't put one decent sentence together to save his life, and ralph sounds as excited as a kid going to the dentist up until somebody crashes, then he yells and screams like a lunatic.
2
10/30/2018 11:38pm
DoctorJD wrote:
I pray that dumbass #SXonFox goes away this year. Some people love to bitch about Ralph, hell, Ralph isn't even (remotely) close to being the worst...
I pray that dumbass #SXonFox goes away this year. Some people love to bitch about Ralph, hell, Ralph isn't even (remotely) close to being the worst thing about the broadcast. That whole program needs an enema.
Never a more truer or succinct observation and recommendation made on Vital
1
10/31/2018 12:15am Edited Date/Time 10/31/2018 12:19am
I like Ricky when he is around. He is opinionated and he delivers some not so subtle jabs at Jeff when he has the opportunity.

So, is it NBC sports? Want to know so I can determine whether to subscribe to fox sports racing or the NBC gold app as I wnot give Cleeng any more of my money to watch the crap they put out last year.
1
1

The Shop

10/31/2018 12:22am
I'm a moto junkie but as the season wears on I find I could care more about watching the rounds.
1
aees
Posts
2885
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
USA
10/31/2018 12:47am
aees wrote:
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what...
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what? It works...

We are a niche sport and will only grow viewership with attracting outside non-riders. The more chatter on twitter, insta, FB etc etc the better for everyone.
mx617 wrote:
Better how exactly?
The fact that i need to explain it just shows that most should not express themselves when it comes to what it good or bad for the sport.

For every activity on social media (posting, commenting, like etc) there is a value you calculate, it also creates other values as chain reaction. It is the same principal as the more (real/active) followers you have, the higher value of your account.

People with more followers creates more buzz. If SX has more activity, it creates more buzz, which in the end attracts sponsors and drives the sport forward.

1
aees
Posts
2885
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
USA
10/31/2018 12:51am
aees wrote:
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what...
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what? It works...

We are a niche sport and will only grow viewership with attracting outside non-riders. The more chatter on twitter, insta, FB etc etc the better for everyone.
Moto96 wrote:
Makeup to mud is an epic fail that missed the mark by miles.. Here we have a girl that looks 16 tops with a 5 year...
Makeup to mud is an epic fail that missed the mark by miles.. Here we have a girl that looks 16 tops with a 5 year old kid and no dad in the picture.
Inspire to buy a motorcycle because your parents bought it for you while you're on welfare............NOT.

Or some chick that obviously has some serious issues, covered with tats, has a kid or 3, and again, No dad in the Picture.

Do they even watch their own shows? UFC would never put out some shit like this. Quite the opposite.



No it did not, it did exactly what it was suppose to do. The characters and theme was carefully selected to address a certain audience and portrait Toyota in a fair way - which it did.

The fact that you bring up "buying a motorcycle" just shows you completely missed who the TOYOTA ADD was targeted for....

It was a TOYOTA ADD, not a SX/Motorcyle etc etc Add...
2
aees
Posts
2885
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
USA
10/31/2018 12:59am
aees wrote:
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what...
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what? It works...

We are a niche sport and will only grow viewership with attracting outside non-riders. The more chatter on twitter, insta, FB etc etc the better for everyone.
STLSharky wrote:
Outside sponsorships. Big time tv time. And people that ride again. I think no hope for sport though. People that sue started the local demise. Sport...
Outside sponsorships. Big time tv time.
And people that ride again. I think no hope for sport though. People that sue started the local demise. Sport just survives off past riders.
Viewership is up, when other sports go down, bike sales has gone down from peak years. So "we" are doing something right.

Im just guessing now, but we are probably tappt out on getting more riders and associated people into viewing SX (besides the regular fluctuations of geographical representation).

So what is increasing is conversion rate = For every rider/associated person in the industry there is a factor of sports interested persons or average joe that you want to convert into SX, and that is going up.

That is what Feld is addressing with all non-SX core stuff.
1
2
aees
Posts
2885
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
USA
10/31/2018 1:11am
DJBobbyD wrote:
I think they need to shorten the show up and maybe not broadcast them live. The 1 hour show back in 1990 was way better and...
I think they need to shorten the show up and maybe not broadcast them live. The 1 hour show back in 1990 was way better and just had highlights of the heats, semis and lcq and then both 125 & 250 mains. You got all the racing and hardly any of the yucking it up between the goofy hosts. I don’t care if it’s live...just need the racing and none of the lifestyle stuff.
zehn wrote:
You want less coverage and no live coverage. Gotcha. Makes a lot of sense.
flatout111 wrote:
Yeah, I def want the live action to stay. I just want the in between content to be good and not where we feel like we...
Yeah, I def want the live action to stay. I just want the in between content to be good and not where we feel like we need to skip stuff. I don't think that's too much to ask for.

Like the College GameDay thing Weege did during MXDN. Something like thst...with some decent guests... would be great.
Go back and listen to those commentators, there is no chance in hell i would prefer them over our existing ones. Line by line the comments are exactly as generic and "dumb" as todays.

If you printed out the comments and did a blind test with individual lines between MXGP, SX, Nationals you would not be able to tell the difference. It is the same type of comments done +- occasional personal differences that happens 2-3 times per night.
2
2
aees
Posts
2885
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
USA
10/31/2018 1:14am
bents wrote:
All I know is that I get SX every Saturday night for a 3 hour live show. It is not a perfect broadcast-shit I have to...
All I know is that I get SX every Saturday night for a 3 hour live show. It is not a perfect broadcast-shit I have to listen to Terry Bradshaw on Thursday night football....but whatever, I don't let it ruin the game for Pete's sake. Ralph and Jeff, meh..they try hard and generally speaking I like them-the telecast does have to have some introductory SX lessons to each show for obvious reasons. I would like to see more in depth rider profiles every show. They are trying to make it better every season in some form or fashion and I'm sure there is a boatload of work going on in the background to make for a better broadcast. When you think of the monumental effort required to put this show on 17 out of 18 weekends, well, I'm going to shut up, enjoy the broadcast, and be thankful that I am not waiting 6 months for Wide World of Sports to show the USGP at Carlsbad.
That is a great summary, it is easy to forget how it used to be.
1
1
10/31/2018 3:02am
Time for a change. No need to criticise Ralph and Jeff, they’ve been at it many many years and it’s just time for a change. Daniel Blair does a great analysis and I hope he gets a shot, he deserves it.
10/31/2018 6:28am
I just find it ironic that this whole approach is to broaden the audience to more casual viewers yet when my friends are in the room and I’m watching it they think it’s the most tragic, cringeworthy display of live television that they’ve ever seen
2
blockhead17
Posts
2885
Joined
6/13/2018
Location
Tokyo, JP
10/31/2018 6:34am
The twitter and Instagram things are lame, however nesecary for the sport to grow. We want guys like Dean Wilson to have a ride then we need more mainstream people tuning in.. it’s just marketing
1
flatout111
Posts
2694
Joined
10/17/2015
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
10/31/2018 7:13am Edited Date/Time 10/31/2018 7:16am
I just find it ironic that this whole approach is to broaden the audience to more casual viewers yet when my friends are in the room...
I just find it ironic that this whole approach is to broaden the audience to more casual viewers yet when my friends are in the room and I’m watching it they think it’s the most tragic, cringeworthy display of live television that they’ve ever seen
I, personally, am very much into production, commentary and presentation. I've called a few local sporting events for local radio and though I am nowhere near the caliber of real announcers, I do have a sense of what it takes to be entertaining and informative. So choice of commentators and the whole presentation overview is something I am always looking at. But I am a die hard SX/MX fan, obviously.

My Wife knows I like Ralph and speak with him here and there and I've also shared with her some of the venom he gets, particularly on Vital. So I actually have had her watch a little bit of racing here and there to get her input on things. To get the casual viewer perspective. That way maybe I could offer some suggestions because complaints with no solutions are just futile.

She never really said much bad about Ralph or even Jeff. She did say that she liked the other guys better (I always watch tapes of Art and David) but hey, I agree there. But her observation, as a casual, was that the Twitter stuff is really dumb and that the segments aren't really informative or about racing. She hated the Toyota War thing and found the Makeup to Mud kinda offensive saying it was very stereotypical. Nothing earth shattering here but interesting to see that the choice of features and presentation not only irks the hardcore fans but also comes across amatuer-ish to casual fans. She also said that the College Gameday thing at MXDN was great and asked why they don't do that in SX like most sports do? I said that I wasn't sure but I agreed.

But it is interesting that, just like the MX gaming thing I rant on, that by trying to please everyone you generally please no one.

Moto96
Posts
668
Joined
8/9/2018
Location
CA
10/31/2018 7:34am
Time for a change. No need to criticise Ralph and Jeff, they’ve been at it many many years and it’s just time for a change. Daniel...
Time for a change. No need to criticise Ralph and Jeff, they’ve been at it many many years and it’s just time for a change. Daniel Blair does a great analysis and I hope he gets a shot, he deserves it.
Blair is horrible. He got caught looking at his his wifes texts during a live broadcast while being called out by Jeremy Martin.
The guy knows nothing about the sport past 2000 or so, and barely knows anything about the current teams.

He had no idea what Hoosier tires were........after a team had been running them for a Full SX season and half of the MX season.

Ralph could tell you about a dirt track race in Marysville in 1975 when Sammy Swindell won the Sprint car classic 200 on Hoosiers.

Ralph has forgotten more than Blair knows. Anyone from this forum would be better. They have far more knowledge, past and current.




5
Moto96
Posts
668
Joined
8/9/2018
Location
CA
10/31/2018 7:44am
aees wrote:
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what...
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what? It works...

We are a niche sport and will only grow viewership with attracting outside non-riders. The more chatter on twitter, insta, FB etc etc the better for everyone.
Moto96 wrote:
Makeup to mud is an epic fail that missed the mark by miles.. Here we have a girl that looks 16 tops with a 5 year...
Makeup to mud is an epic fail that missed the mark by miles.. Here we have a girl that looks 16 tops with a 5 year old kid and no dad in the picture.
Inspire to buy a motorcycle because your parents bought it for you while you're on welfare............NOT.

Or some chick that obviously has some serious issues, covered with tats, has a kid or 3, and again, No dad in the Picture.

Do they even watch their own shows? UFC would never put out some shit like this. Quite the opposite.



aees wrote:
No it did not, it did exactly what it was suppose to do. The characters and theme was carefully selected to address a certain audience and...
No it did not, it did exactly what it was suppose to do. The characters and theme was carefully selected to address a certain audience and portrait Toyota in a fair way - which it did.

The fact that you bring up "buying a motorcycle" just shows you completely missed who the TOYOTA ADD was targeted for....

It was a TOYOTA ADD, not a SX/Motorcyle etc etc Add...
That just proves how bad it missed the mark solidifying my point.

And, you should learn how to add, or learn the difference between an Ad, and Math.

The fact that you bring up "buying a motorcycle" just shows you completely missed who the TOYOTA ADD was targeted for.... It was a TOYOTA ADD, not a SX/Motorcyle etc etc Add.
aees
Posts
2885
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
USA
10/31/2018 8:09am
Moto96 wrote:
Makeup to mud is an epic fail that missed the mark by miles.. Here we have a girl that looks 16 tops with a 5 year...
Makeup to mud is an epic fail that missed the mark by miles.. Here we have a girl that looks 16 tops with a 5 year old kid and no dad in the picture.
Inspire to buy a motorcycle because your parents bought it for you while you're on welfare............NOT.

Or some chick that obviously has some serious issues, covered with tats, has a kid or 3, and again, No dad in the Picture.

Do they even watch their own shows? UFC would never put out some shit like this. Quite the opposite.



aees wrote:
No it did not, it did exactly what it was suppose to do. The characters and theme was carefully selected to address a certain audience and...
No it did not, it did exactly what it was suppose to do. The characters and theme was carefully selected to address a certain audience and portrait Toyota in a fair way - which it did.

The fact that you bring up "buying a motorcycle" just shows you completely missed who the TOYOTA ADD was targeted for....

It was a TOYOTA ADD, not a SX/Motorcyle etc etc Add...
Moto96 wrote:
That just proves how bad it missed the mark solidifying my point. And, you should learn how to add, or learn the difference between an Ad...
That just proves how bad it missed the mark solidifying my point.

And, you should learn how to add, or learn the difference between an Ad, and Math.

The fact that you bring up "buying a motorcycle" just shows you completely missed who the TOYOTA ADD was targeted for.... It was a TOYOTA ADD, not a SX/Motorcyle etc etc Add.
No it did not. An AD for Toyota does not require you to discover or conclude it was a Toyota ad for it to be effective. Just shows you don´t understand advertising.

Btw then, who is Ad or Math? Sorry but dont know them...
(adding: or you have something called auto complete that screw things up from time to time)
flatout111
Posts
2694
Joined
10/17/2015
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
10/31/2018 8:10am Edited Date/Time 10/31/2018 8:20am
So, as I said, just complaining but offering no valid suggestions for improvement is pretty lame and futile. So, what would I do to make the broadcast better? Here are a few of my suggestions.

WARNING: Long post. Read if you have time. If not, it's cool.

1 Social media numbers are very important in society today but instead of the segment with Juliana showing pics of babies and bikes in living rooms just do the scrolling social comments like Outdoor MX does. Same result but no waste of time and less, well, embarrassing looking to both the hardcore fans and the new fans. Juliana is beautiful but the whole segment is not good.

2 Chill out on the constant images of fans acting like idiots when a camera hits them. Yes, we realize people are having fun but it's not necessary to shove it down our throats and show that "Look, we are having so much fun!!". It, again, comes off looking amateur like You don't see this in other sports except in cuts to commercials and it isn't nearly as emphasized.

3 I like Ralph and think he is a consummate pro. Jeff struggles at times but I, too, like him and am fine and happy with them. However, they need some help. Most sports have an info feeder for lack of a better term. Someone who has stats, info, tidbits who feeds the Tony Romos out there extra information in addition to their already excellent knowledge. Hire someone to do just that. It will help Ralph and Jeff. The old ESPN broadcasts were chock full of info about riders, what they did last week, their history, injury status and other details including good bike info. We don't get a lot of that now. Yes, ESPN was a post production but with someone really in the know feeding Ralph and jeff info it would help. (And yes, Weege would be perfect but again, I don't see them sharing help with MX).

4 Better camera work. Spider cam is cool but a bit overused. I miss the low ground shots of back in the day of ESPN. It was just better.

5 We generally have a female reporter track side. All good. Hopefully we get the intelligent yet still beautiful Kristen Beat to take over for our lovely Jenny. But let her do mechanic interviews in race like they used to do. Yes, this involves cooperation by the teams but this would be nice.

6 I'd like to see the running order moved back to the top of the screen. It's not terrible as it is but with the pics it is rather obtrusive. I could do without the pics but I get what they are trying to do. Bring back more stat and info overlays during the race. It can be brought to you by a sponsor which gets them their time but, most importantly, it adds to the race presentation.

7 Nothing beats Art Eckman and David Bailey. They are THE definitive voices of our sport, in my opinion. Period. With that out of the way, though, I have to say I also love Ralph and Jeff, almost like family as they have been doing this a long time. I think they get piled on unnecessarily but if they do decide to go in another direction I would like to see Todd Harris again. And yes, Weege Weege Weege but I don't see it happening. If it can, then cool. But Todd was excellent. Just please, no Robbie Floyd. Nice guy but just not a fan of his commentating, personally. DB125 would also be good on color as he is really good at this but I do wish he was a bit more informed about the sport prior to him racing in it. He seems a bit un-informed at times on anything pre his race days. Still, he is well spoken, informative and entertaining. And when he is done racing completely, I think the 800 will be a solid choice on color. But again, I'm cool with who we have but if they make changes then those are some suggestions.

8 Implement the College Gameday panel discussion. They could bring in DB, Holley from the RDL show for the night show or use RC or whoever to do the College Gameday feature. Have an occasional guest. Talk more to the fans of the sport. This format is especially needed for the Triple Crown races where there is a lot of dead air.

9 I realize sponsors pay the bills. However, look to the past. Back in the day we had sponsors providing segments but they were better. Honda Stopwatch, Honda Flashback were both great sponsor plugs that also ADDED to the presentation and broadcast and were race related. Happy Toyota is in the sport but man, their segments have sucked the last few years. I want them related to our sport. The War feature...ugh...and Makeup...yeah, mostly offroad riding which is cool but it had like nothing to do with Supercross, whatsoever. Just terrible.

10 Most importantly, treat it like a sport, not a show. Yes, it can be entertaining. Yes, I know Feld owns Disney on Ice. But Supercross fans are hard core and it is a niche sport. You can appeal to casuals by doing a great solid presentation. Do quality, informative and entertaining presentation and you will gain new fans. I'm not even much of a football fan but I love listening to Romo and his insight. Same can be said about Jim Fox on LA Kings hockey (which I do love). The sport of MX and SX has a very nice history. It can be made to entertain without dumbing it down and being disrespectful to it as a sport.
3
1
10/31/2018 8:22am
peelout wrote:
the whole broadcast is pretty lame. the way they try to educate the viewer EVERY FUCKING WEEK to what supercross is and how it works. it's...
the whole broadcast is pretty lame. the way they try to educate the viewer EVERY FUCKING WEEK to what supercross is and how it works. it's lame. Ralph and Jeff don't get off the hook that easily.
NO SHIT! Its as if they make all the moto community to be complete dumbasses. "Hey they must have forgot what a start gate was this week, put a segment on that for 15 mins"...
"Oops, the riders are jumping a "triple" better tell people what a triple is again".

Its absolute bullshit. Ralph and Jeff suck balls and never notice something happening on the track while the camera is on it, and they have like 5+ TV screens in front of them with the exact same video feed we watch..

Bring back Art and Bailey. STAT
1
1
TXDirt
Posts
7789
Joined
7/29/2015
Location
Plano, TX, USA
10/31/2018 8:22am
Ralph is a professional announcer and in general does a good job. We are lucky to have him. The problem is that Jeff is terrible and really just mails it in every week. Pair Ralph with Blair or someone else.

Ditch Ricky as he is not good with a mic in his hand. Bring in other former pros like Windham, RV, etc more often.

Spend less time on the superficial stuff like makeup2mud, tweets, etc, and give us more time and interviews in the pits. Get behind the scenes. Go talk with mechanics, team managers, go talk with the riders.

I've never seen a sport do less interviewing with the actual performers then any other sport. I'm not talking about the podium interviews which in general are lame. Get more live behind the scenes interviews.

There is so much great content out there. The problem is that it takes a little bit of effort and creativity to go get it.

SX has been stale for over a decade now. Really longer.....the racing, the production, the whole package.

And if you want to improve the "on track racing" then you need to figure out a way to shake up the starts more. To much follow the leader going on.

I've been saying for years now, that you should pay some championship points in the qualifiers, and then for the main event invert the start order. So so many reasons this would hugely improve the on-track racing.
4
flatout111
Posts
2694
Joined
10/17/2015
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
10/31/2018 8:26am
Time for a change. No need to criticise Ralph and Jeff, they’ve been at it many many years and it’s just time for a change. Daniel...
Time for a change. No need to criticise Ralph and Jeff, they’ve been at it many many years and it’s just time for a change. Daniel Blair does a great analysis and I hope he gets a shot, he deserves it.
Moto96 wrote:
Blair is horrible. He got caught looking at his his wifes texts during a live broadcast while being called out by Jeremy Martin. The guy knows...
Blair is horrible. He got caught looking at his his wifes texts during a live broadcast while being called out by Jeremy Martin.
The guy knows nothing about the sport past 2000 or so, and barely knows anything about the current teams.

He had no idea what Hoosier tires were........after a team had been running them for a Full SX season and half of the MX season.

Ralph could tell you about a dirt track race in Marysville in 1975 when Sammy Swindell won the Sprint car classic 200 on Hoosiers.

Ralph has forgotten more than Blair knows. Anyone from this forum would be better. They have far more knowledge, past and current.




I agree that Ralph knows this sport. No question. I think Blair could be real good but I do agree that he needs to do some studying of the sport. I think he is good on camera and a good speaker so there is a lot of potential.

However, just listen to Main Event Moto. Then compare it to the Steve Matthes Show. I enjoy both but I never miss anything Matthes related because he is super smart about the sport, well spoken, funny and just seriously one of the best things about our sport. I like Blair's stuff but nowhere near as much.
1
10/31/2018 8:27am
Dont really care what they show on the broadcast. I will continue to crack cold ones and sit on the couch every saturday evening during supercross just like i have for the past decade.
flatout111
Posts
2694
Joined
10/17/2015
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
10/31/2018 8:28am
If I could wave a magic wand, my dream broadcast team would be Weege, Matthes and JT.

Will never happen but I'm just saying.

They are pure GOLD together.
10/31/2018 8:30am
diz330 wrote:
Juliana was much more covered up last year with normal clothes. I wonder if they will bring her back at all this year.
I hope they get someone new. Juliana seems like a nice girl, but she has nothing compared to Dianna. Dianna had a personality and was way more comfortable on camera. I'm not going off of looks with this, just purely how they are in front of the camera. Dianna wins. If they can find someone like Dianna, I think it would help out quite a bit.
1
10/31/2018 8:32am
aees wrote:
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what...
Jesus, it is marketing. Like the makeup2mud, it did exactly what it was suppose to. It is about activating people on social media, and guess what? It works...

We are a niche sport and will only grow viewership with attracting outside non-riders. The more chatter on twitter, insta, FB etc etc the better for everyone.
Don't even get me started on the "T#ts-to-track" segment...
Completely worthless tv time. And no-name people who don't even race. How do all these chicks have brand new shit in every video? And new graphics on every new bike and new gear like a damn pro.

Why highlight women so much? The AMA pulled the Pro Women's Motocross series. Do they feel bad about that all of a sudden?

Bring back women's pro moto! Then you can actually give a shit about women riding. Hypocrites.
1
TXDirt
Posts
7789
Joined
7/29/2015
Location
Plano, TX, USA
10/31/2018 8:36am
diz330 wrote:
Juliana was much more covered up last year with normal clothes. I wonder if they will bring her back at all this year.
mattyhamz2 wrote:
I hope they get someone new. Juliana seems like a nice girl, but she has nothing compared to Dianna. Dianna had a personality and was way...
I hope they get someone new. Juliana seems like a nice girl, but she has nothing compared to Dianna. Dianna had a personality and was way more comfortable on camera. I'm not going off of looks with this, just purely how they are in front of the camera. Dianna wins. If they can find someone like Dianna, I think it would help out quite a bit.
At first I did not care for Juliana, but then I realized she is being given crappy assignments. NO ONE, I repeat NO ONE can save the shitty twitter segment. It's lame and not her fault.

Give her better assignments and maybe she would flourish. Maybe she will fall on her face, but we can't judge her on the crap she is given to work with. That's unfair to her.
1
TeamGreen
Posts
37735
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
10/31/2018 8:41am
I don’t have a problem with the folks that are working the mic and I’m pretty sure the broadcast on Fox isn’t gonna get much appreciation around here.

Now, if ya want to add someone to the production that is really good on the mic and knows what he’s taking about? Mike Alessi is pretty damn impressive.
4
10/31/2018 8:53am
diz330 wrote:
Juliana was much more covered up last year with normal clothes. I wonder if they will bring her back at all this year.
mattyhamz2 wrote:
I hope they get someone new. Juliana seems like a nice girl, but she has nothing compared to Dianna. Dianna had a personality and was way...
I hope they get someone new. Juliana seems like a nice girl, but she has nothing compared to Dianna. Dianna had a personality and was way more comfortable on camera. I'm not going off of looks with this, just purely how they are in front of the camera. Dianna wins. If they can find someone like Dianna, I think it would help out quite a bit.
TXDirt wrote:
At first I did not care for Juliana, but then I realized she is being given crappy assignments. NO ONE, I repeat NO ONE can save...
At first I did not care for Juliana, but then I realized she is being given crappy assignments. NO ONE, I repeat NO ONE can save the shitty twitter segment. It's lame and not her fault.

Give her better assignments and maybe she would flourish. Maybe she will fall on her face, but we can't judge her on the crap she is given to work with. That's unfair to her.
It's not the segments to me, it's the personalities. Juliana on IG vs SX broadcast is different to me. She doesn't seem to have the same confidence and personality on tv that she does on her IG. Dianna looks to be the same across the board. That's just my opinion though.
JeepnMike
Posts
2525
Joined
10/18/2012
Location
Enumclaw, WA, USA
10/31/2018 8:53am
I remember the days when SX wasn't on TV and my only source of news and race results was my monthly MXA I couldn't wait to get in the mail.. You guys are picky Wink
6
1
flatout111
Posts
2694
Joined
10/17/2015
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
10/31/2018 8:58am
I concur. If they elect to make changes Mikey would be my first choice for color commentator. Well spoken, informative and extremely relevant to our sport.
1

Post a reply to: Steve's rant of the week on Pulp MX on the SX TV broadcast!

The Latest