107% Rule

hartebreak
Posts
2636
Joined
9/16/2009
Location
Portland, OR US
3/25/2012 11:16am
if this is the retarded logic that people are using then why dont we just go the other way.

We run practice and then adjust the bikes to make it even. If Poto is running 2 seconds a lap faster (x%), then the AMA puts a device on his rear brake that slows his bike x%. That way everyone is equal and has an equal chance.


If this sounds totally rediculous, it is. but so is the talk of removing riders who "arent fast enough".
1
1
loftyair
Posts
2898
Joined
7/3/2009
Location
riverside, CA US
3/25/2012 11:16am
loftyair wrote:
Change the meaning of the blue 'leaders are coming' flag to mean 'get off the track, you are done here', and throw it at least a...
Change the meaning of the blue 'leaders are coming' flag to mean 'get off the track, you are done here', and throw it at least a corner ahead, so they are off track when villo and company come flying by.
should they have mirrors and turn signals as well?
why would villo or any other leader need that? Just the flag will do, or in your logic, a jousting lance maybe?
3/25/2012 11:18am Edited Date/Time 3/25/2012 11:19am
Just make it 8 seconds.
vet323
Posts
3550
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD US
3/25/2012 11:29am
You have to either eliminate the slower riders or give them a reason to race, that's why there should be two mains-one for the top 10 and one for the bottom ten.
1

The Shop

gsxr6
Posts
1956
Joined
9/3/2011
Location
Anderson, CA US
3/25/2012 11:29am
TX24 wrote:
AMA road racing used to do something like this, I don't know if they still do or not. I think more the, you get lapped you...
AMA road racing used to do something like this, I don't know if they still do or not. I think more the, you get lapped you are done
in some form is the way to go.
was thinking this watching both mains. were some guys getting close to being 2 laps down?
chump6784
Posts
1770
Joined
5/9/2011
Location
AU
3/25/2012 12:13pm
i was thinking the same thing after watching Toronto sx and then F1. i dont think the 107% rule would work for sx/mx but imo once you get lapped twice thats the end of your race, black flag, get off the track.
1
3/25/2012 12:32pm
so one guy bitches about riders rolling around and now its a problem and needs solved? pffff
Sherwood wrote:
It's been a problem the entire year to the point they even brought it up at the riders meeting a couple races ago. Time for the...
It's been a problem the entire year to the point they even brought it up at the riders meeting a couple races ago. Time for the AMA to step up and do what they said they would...
jeff alessis slowest lap of the main was still faster than that dudes fastest lap of practice. so if jeff was going so slow that it was a danger, the guy in practice was an extreme danger. but you were ok with him being out there in practice.
1
TX24
Posts
2767
Joined
5/7/2010
Location
San Antonio, TX US
3/25/2012 12:42pm
I do think the guys running say 15-20 have stepped it up compared to say 15 years ago. Back then some of those guys wouldn't do the triples.
redrider52
Posts
891
Joined
5/13/2009
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
3/25/2012 12:48pm
maybe they should just pick names out of a hat to see who wins, then we would need to have races to complain about............
the_wood109
Posts
3008
Joined
7/6/2008
Location
Edgewater, FL US
3/25/2012 3:00pm
Obviously, 107% doesn't work for supercross, but I think that there should be a cutoff point for people that are too slow.
MX558
Posts
1961
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
3/25/2012 4:48pm
If your rolling the triples your a hazard plain and simple. Black flag (Alessi ) the guys .
3/25/2012 4:57pm
SteveS wrote:
It's clear that in SX 107% would be too restrictive. I don't fault Reed for naming the rule that way because that's how we know what...
It's clear that in SX 107% would be too restrictive. I don't fault Reed for naming the rule that way because that's how we know what he's talking about. But you could look at qualifying results over a season's time and come up with a pragmatic percentage to use. At the time Reed tweeted that, the fastest guys were running around 50 seconds or so. But there were one or two whose fastest lap was 20 seconds slower. I don't think we need to eliminate the guys who are doing a 55 or 56 second lap to the 50, but the 1:10 probably doesn't need to stay out there with everyone else.
Reed is the guy who says practice times dont matter, and then he get's all happy when Fro talks about he get's faster through the day...
Reed is the guy who says practice times dont matter, and then he get's all happy when Fro talks about he get's faster through the day....... maybe he should just stick with that?
Several times the track has been altered and lap times can change. Some of the slower riders could have a much greater lap time if the changes to the track suit them better.
30minmotos
Posts
703
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
3/8/2026 8:06am

Only 14 years of the same conversation and the same issues and the same negligence lmaooooo

15
3
JoeyNovice
Posts
107
Joined
11/23/2019
Location
Toledo, OH US
3/9/2026 12:01pm

I had never heard of the 107% concept so I was curious to see how it would look with this season's qualifying. Just looking at the 450 class here.

image 2715
8
30minmotos
Posts
703
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
3/9/2026 12:11pm
JoeyNovice wrote:
I had never heard of the 107% concept so I was curious to see how it would look with this season's qualifying. Just looking at the...

I had never heard of the 107% concept so I was curious to see how it would look with this season's qualifying. Just looking at the 450 class here.

image 2715

Can you run that again at 104? 104 seems to be better for sx. 107 is based on f1 rules.

1
JoeyNovice
Posts
107
Joined
11/23/2019
Location
Toledo, OH US
3/9/2026 12:15pm
30minmotos wrote:

Can you run that again at 104? 104 seems to be better for sx. 107 is based on f1 rules.

Adjusted for 104

image 2716.png?VersionId=GuyqZ6jpz5dcX0q8MGNy
5
30minmotos
Posts
703
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
3/9/2026 12:17pm
30minmotos wrote:

Can you run that again at 104? 104 seems to be better for sx. 107 is based on f1 rules.

JoeyNovice wrote:
Adjusted for 104

Adjusted for 104

image 2716.png?VersionId=GuyqZ6jpz5dcX0q8MGNy

Definitely an interesting discussion. 107 too high - 104 potentially too aggressive, but there should be some sort of cut off.


What do you make of it?

2
KurtJ99
Posts
2322
Joined
2/6/2017
Location
CA US
3/9/2026 12:19pm

So if Jett comes back and burns a smoking qual time, is he the only one allowed to race? 😂😂😂😂

I don't see how it could be relevant to moto. If you want to trim the field, trim it a number not a time. Or perhaps if you were trying to cover more scenarios, for example, in the MXGP fly-away races they have locals allowed to race who are lapped like around lap 3. Super dangerous - just trying to fill some gates. So you would have to say 1XX% of fastest guy, or 18 racers (trimmed number), whichever is less. 

1
1
Gravel
Posts
1773
Joined
2/22/2014
Location
Ridgecrest, CA US
3/9/2026 1:13pm

Or (not my idea, but it’s a good one) ditch the 250 regional series and pump up the 450 payouts so that we have more fast guys riding 450s. 

Basically, whatever it takes to get the whole field of riders to push hard through the entire race. It’s embarrassing to watch anyone in the 450 main coasting around the track, it’s literally the pinnacle of moto and several guys are just jellydicking their way around the track like it’s a practice session at a local track.  

 

6
MotoDad32
Posts
231
Joined
7/23/2017
Location
Beverly Hills, CA US
3/9/2026 1:15pm
PROMXMOM wrote:
its easy for guys like chad to say that.they are on equipment that is capable of running top lap times.im sure if they jumped on some...
its easy for guys like chad to say that.they are on equipment that is capable of running top lap times.im sure if they jumped on some priveteers bike they would change there tone.put them all on egual bikes and see what happens

What do you think would happen?  You think the podium would look vastly different than it does today?

30minmotos
Posts
703
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
3/9/2026 1:26pm
hartebreak wrote:
if this is the retarded logic that people are using then why dont we just go the other way. We run practice and then adjust the...
if this is the retarded logic that people are using then why dont we just go the other way.

We run practice and then adjust the bikes to make it even. If Poto is running 2 seconds a lap faster (x%), then the AMA puts a device on his rear brake that slows his bike x%. That way everyone is equal and has an equal chance.


If this sounds totally rediculous, it is. but so is the talk of removing riders who "arent fast enough".

Well, they aren’t… some of these guys get lapped in the heat races….

Robgvx
Posts
3988
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
3/9/2026 1:28pm

MXGP implemented a 107% rule about fifteen years ago following issues with super-slow locals. Then in Italy (maybe?) it rained, and a bunch of regular (and worthy) GP guys fell foul of it; riders who were never intended to be the target of the rule. 

1
umagumadog
Posts
1267
Joined
10/29/2006
Location
GA US
3/9/2026 1:32pm

You can’t make riders any closer than current training and technique already does. Put a ceiling on race bike price and don’t allow the factory’s to run any part they can’t/wont sale to any other team, especially electronics. 
Best bike, rider and team still win but the field is closer and everyone’s pocketbook isn’t so light. 
Factories have enough riders they can still test under competition conditions they just can’t race anything they test until released to all the competing teams on their brand then it can trickle down to the public. 
Or something along those lines. 

2
3/9/2026 1:55pm
Robgvx wrote:
MXGP implemented a 107% rule about fifteen years ago following issues with super-slow locals. Then in Italy (maybe?) it rained, and a bunch of regular (and...

MXGP implemented a 107% rule about fifteen years ago following issues with super-slow locals. Then in Italy (maybe?) it rained, and a bunch of regular (and worthy) GP guys fell foul of it; riders who were never intended to be the target of the rule. 

I’m guessing that it’s no longer a rule? Some of the local guys they let race at the fly away races definitely don’t belong out there.

1
Toste
Posts
463
Joined
5/24/2009
Location
Pahrump, NV US
Fantasy
3/9/2026 5:03pm
30minmotos wrote:

Can you run that again at 104? 104 seems to be better for sx. 107 is based on f1 rules.

JoeyNovice wrote:
Adjusted for 104

Adjusted for 104

image 2716.png?VersionId=GuyqZ6jpz5dcX0q8MGNy

Seems like Eli's suggestion of 15 riders is about right.

3
Robgvx
Posts
3988
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
3/9/2026 6:31pm
Robgvx wrote:
MXGP implemented a 107% rule about fifteen years ago following issues with super-slow locals. Then in Italy (maybe?) it rained, and a bunch of regular (and...

MXGP implemented a 107% rule about fifteen years ago following issues with super-slow locals. Then in Italy (maybe?) it rained, and a bunch of regular (and worthy) GP guys fell foul of it; riders who were never intended to be the target of the rule. 

I’m guessing that it’s no longer a rule? Some of the local guys they let race at the fly away races definitely don’t belong out there.

No. When some good guys fell foul of it in the mud, I believe they scrapped it. 

1
3/9/2026 7:02pm
JoeyNovice wrote:
I had never heard of the 107% concept so I was curious to see how it would look with this season's qualifying. Just looking at the...

I had never heard of the 107% concept so I was curious to see how it would look with this season's qualifying. Just looking at the 450 class here.

image 2715
30minmotos wrote:

Can you run that again at 104? 104 seems to be better for sx. 107 is based on f1 rules.

MotoGP uses 105%

snackfedbear
Posts
1060
Joined
10/18/2016
Location
Southern, CA US
3/9/2026 7:13pm
Gravel wrote:
Or (not my idea, but it’s a good one) ditch the 250 regional series and pump up the 450 payouts so that we have more fast...

Or (not my idea, but it’s a good one) ditch the 250 regional series and pump up the 450 payouts so that we have more fast guys riding 450s. 

Basically, whatever it takes to get the whole field of riders to push hard through the entire race. It’s embarrassing to watch anyone in the 450 main coasting around the track, it’s literally the pinnacle of moto and several guys are just jellydicking their way around the track like it’s a practice session at a local track.  

 

Jelly dicking, I’m gonna steal that one thanks

1
3/9/2026 7:23pm

Vince would have made it in at 107%. It would have to drop to 105% to get him out. So I recommend 105%. 

1
skypig
Posts
896
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
Caloundra AU
3/9/2026 7:27pm

I raced a National Road Race series - I was slow, and the kids I was racing were fast, and famous.
I didn’t make the 110% rule, and was prepared to sit it out and spectate (inc Pit/Front row for the World Championship races run concurrently with the National Champs)
The Clerk of the Course summoned me, and said “Don’t try and get out of the way. Ride safe. Hold your line. Enjoy the racing.” It was a long track, in last place, had it to myself till the last lap, when I was lapped by the leaders. Such good memories.

The whole thing is tricky. We don’t want to exclude anymore people than we have too. We want to accept “lappers” as part of the sport - the racer that “deals” with the lappers, Like the racer that “deals” with the whoops, gets an advantage. We don’t want extra risk, or lappers alone deciding the outcome.

I’ve suggested on another thread that the Blue flag meaning is amended to include: “you can’t improve your position by passing under a Blue”. So a rider that slows/moves off “the” line for the leaders, isn’t passed by the person he is racing. If I was holding on to my first ever top ten: I’d be reluctant to look behind or do anything that might make me finish 11th. Thoughts?

4
1

Post a reply to: 107% Rule

The Latest