Anderson Out for Daytona

3strokemx wrote:

It's cool for Deegan to break the law and sell T-shirts with his mugshot, but  Anderson should lose his job for a dropped misdemeanor charge?

BoxcarWilly wrote:

A lot of insecure losers in this thread, that's for sure. 

Thisusernameisavailable wrote:

I downvoted you, because of personal experience. About 15 years ago, my then partner had me arrested claiming I had attempted to strangle her. Which was...

I downvoted you, because of personal experience. About 15 years ago, my then partner had me arrested claiming I had attempted to strangle her. Which was 'somewhat' true.. When being interviewed by the police, the first question they asked me was "Are you left or right handed?" (Me- Right handed) An hour later they asked which hand I grabbed her round the throat with..? (Me- left hand) "And where was your right hand?" (Me- around her left wrist, stretched away from us so she couldn't hit me over the head a third time with the tool.) End of questioning- "You don't attempt to strangle someone with your weakest hand.... No further action." The lump on the side of my head was substantial- I wish I had reversed the charges, but at the time I just wanted the whole thing to end. We did separate, we get on reasonably well now. We have a daughter together (19yrs old this year). Its funny how it all turns out..

Black Diesel Bomber wrote:

Thanks for sharing, and having the balls to share unlike many others here.  A perfect example of trying to defend yourself and fend off an aggressive...

Thanks for sharing, and having the balls to share unlike many others here.  A perfect example of trying to defend yourself and fend off an aggressive charging woman. 

uncledaddy69 wrote:

It’s ironic that you are complimenting someone for being brave enough to speak about being abused when the exact language and arguments you’re using against women...

It’s ironic that you are complimenting someone for being brave enough to speak about being abused when the exact language and arguments you’re using against women is the reason why so many women are afraid to come forward and speak on being abused. 
One of my goals this year is to try to find more common ground with everyone and try to see things from perspectives different than my own, but I think it’s very strange how long and hard you’ve been fighting in this thread. I’m not saying you’re someone who would abuse women, but the way you’re posting makes it sound like you want to defend people who do abuse women. If that’s not your intention, I would think more carefully about what you choose to say and how you say it. 

Black Diesel Bomber wrote:

Thanks for sharing, and having the balls to share unlike many others here.  A perfect example of trying to defend yourself and fend off an aggressive...

Thanks for sharing, and having the balls to share unlike many others here.  A perfect example of trying to defend yourself and fend off an aggressive charging woman. 

uncledaddy69 wrote:

It’s ironic that you are complimenting someone for being brave enough to speak about being abused when the exact language and arguments you’re using against women...

It’s ironic that you are complimenting someone for being brave enough to speak about being abused when the exact language and arguments you’re using against women is the reason why so many women are afraid to come forward and speak on being abused. 
One of my goals this year is to try to find more common ground with everyone and try to see things from perspectives different than my own, but I think it’s very strange how long and hard you’ve been fighting in this thread. I’m not saying you’re someone who would abuse women, but the way you’re posting makes it sound like you want to defend people who do abuse women. If that’s not your intention, I would think more carefully about what you choose to say and how you say it. 

Black Diesel Bomber wrote:

So before I log off, you and TooOld4WFO are just going to run with your tails between your legs and avoid the questions above?  You guys...

So before I log off, you and TooOld4WFO are just going to run with your tails between your legs and avoid the questions above?  You guys come in to debate and then when asked to answer simple questions you go silent??  What kind of people do that?  You are not going to achieve your goal of trying to see things from other perspectives, because that's what I was trying to do with you when you made this comment: 

"Do I think he put his hands on her in a way that made her scared enough to call the cops? Yes."

To me, that looks like it could be spreading false information, so I was trying to understand how you came to this conclusion a.k.a see things from a different perspective, but you can't seem to answer this and the other simple yes or no question above.  That tells me all I need to know about you guys, just crickets for now.  As for responding being described as "fighting hard" is nothing for me, this is far from a fight. Vital is on one of the 5 monitors up above at my desk and it's not hard for me to multitask and use voice to text to respond very quickly as it usually does a good job without making too many typos.

Say I sound like I'm defending someone who abuse women all you want, but that's fine but far from the truth or who I am, which is why I'm very comfortable being a one man band here fighting the battle.  By saying Jason is someone who abuses women is an accusation you are going with from an allegation made, which is not cool if he happens to be innocent.

If and when he is proven guilty, then I'm with you.  Until then, I've said what I need to say especially if this case has indeed been dropped.  It will either surface again, or it won't and we'll never know the real story. 

3strokemx wrote:

It's cool for Deegan to break the law and sell T-shirts with his mugshot, but  Anderson should lose his job for a dropped misdemeanor charge?

BoxcarWilly wrote:

Don't be dense. 

uncledaddy69 wrote:

It’s ironic that you are complimenting someone for being brave enough to speak about being abused when the exact language and arguments you’re using against women...

It’s ironic that you are complimenting someone for being brave enough to speak about being abused when the exact language and arguments you’re using against women is the reason why so many women are afraid to come forward and speak on being abused. 
One of my goals this year is to try to find more common ground with everyone and try to see things from perspectives different than my own, but I think it’s very strange how long and hard you’ve been fighting in this thread. I’m not saying you’re someone who would abuse women, but the way you’re posting makes it sound like you want to defend people who do abuse women. If that’s not your intention, I would think more carefully about what you choose to say and how you say it. 

Black Diesel Bomber wrote:

So before I log off, you and TooOld4WFO are just going to run with your tails between your legs and avoid the questions above?  You guys...

So before I log off, you and TooOld4WFO are just going to run with your tails between your legs and avoid the questions above?  You guys come in to debate and then when asked to answer simple questions you go silent??  What kind of people do that?  You are not going to achieve your goal of trying to see things from other perspectives, because that's what I was trying to do with you when you made this comment: 

"Do I think he put his hands on her in a way that made her scared enough to call the cops? Yes."

To me, that looks like it could be spreading false information, so I was trying to understand how you came to this conclusion a.k.a see things from a different perspective, but you can't seem to answer this and the other simple yes or no question above.  That tells me all I need to know about you guys, just crickets for now.  As for responding being described as "fighting hard" is nothing for me, this is far from a fight. Vital is on one of the 5 monitors up above at my desk and it's not hard for me to multitask and use voice to text to respond very quickly as it usually does a good job without making too many typos.

Say I sound like I'm defending someone who abuse women all you want, but that's fine but far from the truth or who I am, which is why I'm very comfortable being a one man band here fighting the battle.  By saying Jason is someone who abuses women is an accusation you are going with from an allegation made, which is not cool if he happens to be innocent.

If and when he is proven guilty, then I'm with you.  Until then, I've said what I need to say especially if this case has indeed been dropped.  It will either surface again, or it won't and we'll never know the real story. 

uncledaddy69 wrote:

I’m at work, busting my ass, and trying to build a business. Sorry man, arguing with people on the internet is for kooks and not something...

I’m at work, busting my ass, and trying to build a business. Sorry man, arguing with people on the internet is for kooks and not something I enjoy doing. I said what I wanted to say. Enjoy your time on the internet ☺️

280driver wrote:

Black Diesel Bomber, I am curious why are you so engaged in this?  The amount of time you must be investing to post as often as...

Black Diesel Bomber, I am curious why are you so engaged in this?  The amount of time you must be investing to post as often as you have is impressive.  What’s the deal?

Johnny Ringo wrote:

Black Diesel is having an all time crash out lately. Enjoy it while it lasts

Black Diesel Bomber wrote:

So before I log off, you and TooOld4WFO are just going to run with your tails between your legs and avoid the questions above?  You guys...

So before I log off, you and TooOld4WFO are just going to run with your tails between your legs and avoid the questions above?  You guys come in to debate and then when asked to answer simple questions you go silent??  What kind of people do that?  You are not going to achieve your goal of trying to see things from other perspectives, because that's what I was trying to do with you when you made this comment: 

"Do I think he put his hands on her in a way that made her scared enough to call the cops? Yes."

To me, that looks like it could be spreading false information, so I was trying to understand how you came to this conclusion a.k.a see things from a different perspective, but you can't seem to answer this and the other simple yes or no question above.  That tells me all I need to know about you guys, just crickets for now.  As for responding being described as "fighting hard" is nothing for me, this is far from a fight. Vital is on one of the 5 monitors up above at my desk and it's not hard for me to multitask and use voice to text to respond very quickly as it usually does a good job without making too many typos.

Say I sound like I'm defending someone who abuse women all you want, but that's fine but far from the truth or who I am, which is why I'm very comfortable being a one man band here fighting the battle.  By saying Jason is someone who abuses women is an accusation you are going with from an allegation made, which is not cool if he happens to be innocent.

If and when he is proven guilty, then I'm with you.  Until then, I've said what I need to say especially if this case has indeed been dropped.  It will either surface again, or it won't and we'll never know the real story. 

uncledaddy69 wrote:

I’m at work, busting my ass, and trying to build a business. Sorry man, arguing with people on the internet is for kooks and not something...

I’m at work, busting my ass, and trying to build a business. Sorry man, arguing with people on the internet is for kooks and not something I enjoy doing. I said what I wanted to say. Enjoy your time on the internet ☺️

Black Diesel Bomber wrote:

Haha, I am too buddy, maybe you should learn how to multitask and voice text to be more efficient.  Thanks for your response and dodging the...

Haha, I am too buddy, maybe you should learn how to multitask and voice text to be more efficient.  Thanks for your response and dodging the simple questions presented to you, it's very telling.  

ohh_454 wrote:

PMG Suzuki, A-Star gear, Airoh Helmets, Monster, and 100% goggles, a podium guy, 180k a month doesn’t seem out of reach. 

gt80rider wrote:

Oh and... just another reason to get rid of the three smx races... these guys desperately need more time off.... instead of fuking billionaires using their...

Oh and... just another reason to get rid of the three smx races... these guys desperately need more time off.... instead of fuking billionaires using their asses to make millions upon millions, give em a few more weeks off... you can only push these guys so far before they break... and these fn billionaires dgaf... 

280driver wrote:

Black Diesel Bomber, I am curious why are you so engaged in this?  The amount of time you must be investing to post as often as...

Black Diesel Bomber, I am curious why are you so engaged in this?  The amount of time you must be investing to post as often as you have is impressive.  What’s the deal?

Black Diesel Bomber wrote:

I've been juggling this all while wrapping up a big project. BTW, I probably spend a lot less time VTT'ing these posts than some of you...

I've been juggling this all while wrapping up a big project. BTW, I probably spend a lot less time VTT'ing these posts than some of you who are hunting and pecking. I'm engaged in this because I don't like to see a crowd of bitter grown men pounce on a man and woman when they are down with health issues and having relationship issues, and also making accusations that Jason is a wife beater, especially coming from a former police officer who should know better.

He very well could be guilty, but so can she, and none of us know what went down until further information/evidence is released, or not.  And if it is proven, well then that's the time for all you guys to pounce if that makes you feel better. But like I said way back when this started I hope the best for them, and I had no problem dealing with the pitch forks during this thread.  But I'm wrapping things up and heading out, so all you guys can be stoked I'm gone, until next time.

JA21's Gay lil Mustache wrote:

I’d be more likely to give him the benefit of the doubt if he wasn’t historically such a douche. 

3strokemx wrote:

It's cool for Deegan to break the law and sell T-shirts with his mugshot, but  Anderson should lose his job for a dropped misdemeanor charge?

BoxcarWilly wrote:

Don't be dense. 

3strokemx wrote:

No reason to be hostile and insulting, 
If you can't think of an answer that's fine, but calling me names doesn't help justify your opinion.

BoxcarWilly wrote:

Don't be dense. 

3strokemx wrote:

No reason to be hostile and insulting, 
If you can't think of an answer that's fine, but calling me names doesn't help justify your opinion.

TheMilkman wrote:

You really don’t see the difference in a victimless crime like doing burnouts and domestic violence? I think the “dense” callout was more than appropriate. You’re...

You really don’t see the difference in a victimless crime like doing burnouts and domestic violence? I think the “dense” callout was more than appropriate. You’re just being antagonistic at this point. 

Tyler D wrote:

funny thing is, they never know the masculine counterpart of the term

Tyler D wrote:

funny thing is, they never know the masculine counterpart of the term

Mxracer06y wrote:

Lmao look at the down votes on our comments Lots of feminine energy here. Very misandristic apparently  I wonder if everyone here runs to their wives and girlfriends...

Lmao look at the down votes on our comments

 

Lots of feminine energy here. Very misandristic apparently 

 

I wonder if everyone here runs to their wives and girlfriends saying "honey look what I downvoted today !"

3strokemx wrote:

No reason to be hostile and insulting, 
If you can't think of an answer that's fine, but calling me names doesn't help justify your opinion.

TheMilkman wrote:

You really don’t see the difference in a victimless crime like doing burnouts and domestic violence? I think the “dense” callout was more than appropriate. You’re...

You really don’t see the difference in a victimless crime like doing burnouts and domestic violence? I think the “dense” callout was more than appropriate. You’re just being antagonistic at this point. 

3strokemx wrote:

I'm not a city councilman, but I think the law is in place because people could be injured from reckless driving. So yes, thankfully no victim...

I'm not a city councilman, but I think the law is in place because people could be injured from reckless driving. So yes, thankfully no victim (that time).   By your logic, driving while intoxicated is victimless as well? 

How about shooting into the air?  That is a victimless crime unless someone happens to get shot, so it's acceptable behavior?

Mxracer06y wrote:

Lmao look at the down votes on our comments Lots of feminine energy here. Very misandristic apparently  I wonder if everyone here runs to their wives and girlfriends...

Lmao look at the down votes on our comments

 

Lots of feminine energy here. Very misandristic apparently 

 

I wonder if everyone here runs to their wives and girlfriends saying "honey look what I downvoted today !"

gt80rider wrote:

Oh and... just another reason to get rid of the three smx races... these guys desperately need more time off.... instead of fuking billionaires using their...

Oh and... just another reason to get rid of the three smx races... these guys desperately need more time off.... instead of fuking billionaires using their asses to make millions upon millions, give em a few more weeks off... you can only push these guys so far before they break... and these fn billionaires dgaf... 

Trickamoto wrote:

Yeah…  beating up on chicks because they have three extra races a year. lol