Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Hope they are successful though, more off season race the better.
Be prepared to be impressed.
https://salarysport.com/motorsport/formula-1/lewis-hamilton/
"Todd Jendro: Riding off the popularity and the coattails of supercross, it surely didn’t meet the definition of a modern-day supercross. It was more of an arenacross at the time. So there was a little bit of angst there about the use or the term. Of course, through time and the definition, it is a bit public domain where the use of supercross can be used, but it certainly didn’t meet the definition, really, what supercross was at the time.
Charlie Mancuso (President, Pace Motorsports): In that time period, we couldn’t really be pissed off about them using the name supercross because we had already established that the name supercross by itself is a generic term. We were always aware and concerned about our competition, and welcomed it, but we took it seriously. I wouldn’t say we were pissed off. I don’t remember being pissed off.The AMA had a definition of supercross, and that’s what we all lived by for all these years. We had to protect it, so I went after Eric. I sued him for a dollar."
GARY BECKER
Gary Becker: But [Eric] was calling it supercross, and supercross has a distinct definition, and his event did not meet that definition. By that time, in ’98, I’ve been doing it three years, and at the time we just invested millions of dollars into our track and the way we do business and everything we’re doing and things are great. Then Eric comes in and calls it U.S. Open of Supercross [laughs].Eric Peronnard: Once again, my wife and I, we’re on the bubble of naiveness. We know Roy Janson is not happy and Mancuso and those guys, but whatever. We’re doing our job. We don’t feel like we’ve stepped on anybody. The AMA gave us a supercross sanction!
Gary Becker: I don’t doubt that Eric had that sanction, but the AMA had a definition of supercross, and that’s what we all lived by for all these years. We had to protect it, so I went after Eric. I sued him for a dollar.
Eric Peronnard: Let me explain to you the case. The case was very simple. AMA had made a deal with Pace for the term AMA Supercross. The definition of AMA Supercross was the stadium was at least 30,000 seats. I’ve got total respect for that deal being done, but we were not made aware of it. The AMA sold us the same supercross sanction, same price, with 15,000 seats. So technically we were an arenacross.
Pete Fox: Hell yeah I remember that fight over that word of supercross. That was mind-boggling to me. It was such an education and such an experience. How could they own that word?Eric Peronnard: The month before the race, we had an injunction from Pace. We’re like, holy shit. They said, “You can’t use the word supercross.” A couple weeks before, we received the injunction—most likely Carol received it at the dealership—saying, “You can’t use the word supercross.”
Gary Becker: I think arenacross was starting to get pretty popular in the mid-nineties as well. I think Mike Kidd was doing some arenacross. So this was arenacross. This wasn’t a supercross. The definition of supercross is in a stadium with 25,000-plus people.
Eric Peronnard: Everything is done. We had a good, young lawyer and he basically attacked the project and went and went and went. We finalized, I think it was the day before the race. We won that case. So we were concerned, but I don't think they could have been shutting us down completely.
Pete Fox: Whoever it was, was trying to shut it down. That was pretty wild.
Eric Peronnard: Pace tried to sue us. They sued both Mike and I. We had absolutely no…. It’s like I always said, I went to McDonald’s. They sold me a Big Mac that you’re telling me it’s not a Big Mac. Yes, you’re the competition, but you’re telling me what I got is not a Big Mac? But I paid McDonald’s for the Big Mac. So it’s like, where is the point? So without being so basic, that was the case, and they lost. So they lost and the race went on. I’m fighting Pace in court and it’s so expensive. You discover how much those things cost. We’re talking every time it’s $10,000. They were bottomless. They could spend all the money they wanted. I think they couldn’t believe what was going on. It was just very upsetting to them, but more on the pride level than anything else.
I could see some sort of series with 2 Aus/NZ rounds, 2-3 European rounds, and 3-4 US rounds (8ish total).
Or perhaps a couple of US rounds will be combined AMA/FIM rounds.
Pit Row
PS: If they can create a schedule like back at the start of the ninties with a race in Japan, France, Swiss, Holland. Maybe one in Germany and two or three Australia.
PS2: The second question is, do you wanna race for 50 to 70k people (because that kind of stadiums are pretty rare in Europe) or do you aim on Paris (30k people), Montpelier (7k people), Geneva (7k people), ...
They should use all the 1 off races to make a world sx.
Aus x
Paris sx
Monster cup
Add maybe a nz race
And other race in Europe or Canada and u have a series. It's a small series but it will be most successful that way
Those were always cool and had a good following. It was a great opportunity to see the guys on new bikes with less pressure.
If they have ambitions beyond that I think they are in for a much tougher time.
Basically what your snippet covered. Cochrane, the principal is well known and quite successful.
What he knows about SX as opposed to gathering investors who know less, would be a point of discussion.
Notable that there does not appear to be a figure head rider involved.
2. Few months ago at the Vurb classic event, Chad and I chatted for a few min and I asked him about this subject and if he would still be interested or want to be involved in SX and he said ‘absolutely’. Said he had some guys to invest too.
3. A fall series could possibly work, but I just don’t see it working while overlapping our current series. (Money, logistics, tv coverage).
Thinking of some privateer buddies of mine, they would need good start money just to make the trip overseas. Too expensive and difficult to do it on their own unless the purse was ridiculously high.
I’m not against another series and have thought about a fall series and mentioned it to friends for years, but two series at the same time just won’t work. (Jam sports).
DD
Post a reply to: New FIM World Supercross Championship