Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Ranging from 500 to 1500
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Do the factory teams use nitrogen?
I think it’s completely valid to ask: Why the heck is KTM doing this? Especially since the rest of the bike is fantastic and others have had suspension dialed for years.
Off topic, but what do you feel is wrong with the xplor forks?
Companies who continue to innovate and are willing to continuously experiment and fail are the one's who revolutionize their industry.
Pit Row
The Xplor actually are the worst forks on the market. Literally cannot think of a currently produced fork that is less tunable and less versatile than the Xplor.
- They are shorter than both 4CS and AER for that signature Euro stinkbug feel.
- Clickers do nothing (this is well documented).
- The midvalve doesn’t have a shim stack.
-They are split function for unknown reasons.
-The stock valving is dangerous over 45mph.
-Revalve can help, but I’ve never found them to be anywhere near the rest of the forks on the market even after a revalve.
The 52’s use the same cartridge and internal parts as the Xact pro 7548 cone valve fork, the outer tube is 4 mm larger.
Post a reply to: Will KTM / WP ever give up on trying to reinvent the fork?