All

In your mind, is everyone who is a fan of any particular rider a "ball-gargler"? Can one only NOT be a ball-gargler if they aren't a fan of one rider over the others??

Yeah great point.. SX was really struggling when McGrath was dominating and again when RC was winning everything

Me: states a fact without saying anything negative about Deegan You: cries about last weekend Me: again points out that I was just stating a fact concerning the conditions You: "See! You're triggered!" No one is triggered dude, you're just being nonsensical

So if a rider lands flat on his back on concrete, it’ll be the same forces as if the rider landed on a softer matting. Did you take science at school?

Wait I thought Deegan was one of the media darlings and was being catered to. Now he’s public enemy #1 and being treated unfairly? Y’all can’t have both!

Has Vince Friese ever had a penalty?

There were definately comments on here calling him unprofessional......

There is other fairytales i’d rather read.

I have zero problems in being judged in here. It was YOU that wanted me to back up my post, and when i did that you say that i can’t handle being judged?

Are you talking about when Eli jumped on and off the table? Jett cases the heck out of it but somehow cleared the next triple just fine.

Only had the 5th fastest lap...

There are people who live outside of the USA. Also water is wet outside of USA.

You f***ing losers need to go outside and touch some grass, breathe some fresh air and look at the sky. Every week it's the same shit with you guys. Do you even watch the races? Nobody wants to hear your shit, go yell at your wives or something.

You make it sound like a bad thing?

Not British... And it's "drivel". Leigh is fine.

I don't get you guys. Leigh sounds perfectly fine to me (Weege is better, but no complaints about Leigh from me) and Will doesn't bother me at all. I've heard better from some of the RDL guests theyve had, but I have no real opinion on her. They both can at least form coherent sentences on the broadcast.

Okay, I’ll answer your bullet points. Look at the incident as a whole Did he gain a time advantage? No. It caused him to have a slower lap time. Just because he could’ve lost MORE time doesn’t mean it’s suddenly a time advantage vs. staying on course. Entering at the next possible point? I disagree that he could’ve entered before the monster block you’re talking about as he was rolling inbetween them after getting bumped and there was the large, long start straight tuff block inbetween that one and the one he entered in after. Unsafe accelerating off track? Again...

"The only question you need to ask is did he accelerate?" So your interpretation is, if someone came to a complete stop, they could never re-enter the course as that would require someone to accelerate to even move? Not so sure I'm buying into your line of thinking. TM

There’s no rule saying a rider can’t accelerate while off track. Are the riders meant to push their bike back to the track if they end up going off? Again, all your points are arguing that he didn’t face a big enough disadvantage while off track, not that what happened was an overall advantage to either gaining time or position. If a rider goes off track which causes a slower lap time and he loses positions, that is not an advantage! You’re arguing that it wasn’t a big enough disadvantage. That’s not how the rule works or is written. I...