Ordered Part, received bill from FedEx for CBP 2 months later

Robgvx
Posts
3987
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
4/14/2026 7:16am
Huevos450R wrote:
This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national...

This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national security order that Trump has in place.

If your goods are covered by a Section 232 order, the tariff applies from dollar one, regardless of the shipment's value.. 

 

Dirt bike passenger foot pegs a national security issue. Who knew?

9
3
RDnutz
Posts
552
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO US
4/14/2026 7:38am
Huevos450R wrote:
This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national...

This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national security order that Trump has in place.

If your goods are covered by a Section 232 order, the tariff applies from dollar one, regardless of the shipment's value.. 

 

only some of them struck down by Supreme Court. There were multiple other code sections to use to accomplish the same end result, and the administration was already planning to substitute those if the litigation went against the 1st batch tried. If at 1st you don't succeed...

2
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2083
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ US
4/14/2026 7:42am Edited Date/Time 4/14/2026 8:23am
Hey guys, these are NOT tariffs, the trump tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court and most have been put on hold. However, few people...

Hey guys, these are NOT tariffs, the trump tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court and most have been put on hold. However, few people know that in further screwing US consumers over, in addition the tariffs, the trump administration changed other customs rules that really pick our pockets. The rule they got rid of was the "De Minimis Exemption" rule put in place in 1938.  Previously, small imported items with a value of less than $800 did not face a customs valuation and went straight to your doorstep w/o additional fees. Trump removed that very sensible De Minimis Exemption rule and anything with a value of one cent or more faces customs valuations (even though there are no tariffs as they have been deemed illegal) and involve paperwork for which the shipping companies can charge us exorbitant brokerage fees.  I recently bought a $2 decal from the UK and a month later, Fed-ex sent a bill for me to pay $65 in brokerage fees! An $80 item I bought from Italy, UPS demanded I pay $55 in brokerage fees before they would deliver and said they would send it back to Italy if I didn't pay.  If the tariffs were still in place, we would be getting hit with that charge too.  They are really f'ing us over, and it makes no sense for the benefit of the citizens or country as a whole, but some people literally voted for this.

I know this post is going to hurt some people's feelings.

Huevos450R wrote:
This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national...

This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national security order that Trump has in place.

If your goods are covered by a Section 232 order, the tariff applies from dollar one, regardless of the shipment's value.. 

 

It is absolutely not incorrect and you just repeated most of what I said above and then made a conclusion that is ludicrously false.  Section 232 is the tariffs on steel, aluminum, copper and patented pharmaceuticals put in place by trump in 2026, that I mentioned above. Most of us talking in this thread are not importing raw steel or copper, we are talking small motorcycle parts, with the exception of the Luxon post as he was probably importing aluminum stock. But if you think that my $2 stickers from the UK were a matter of national security and felt so strongly that you had to post about it, then that is quite a wacky response.  With the exception of the Luxon post, what most of us are being affected by is the abolishment of the 1938 De Minimis Exception rule which now causes every item, regardless of value, to have to undergo customs valuation review and processing and thus the brokerage fees being charged by the shipping companies.

6
3
robkinuk
Posts
4266
Joined
5/16/2007
Location
Ashbourne GB
4/14/2026 7:51am

Only Donald Tariff could have trumped up these stupid charges?

8
5

The Shop

Luxon MX
Posts
1366
Joined
11/6/2017
Location
San Diego, CA US
Fantasy
4/14/2026 8:10am
It is absolutely not incorrect and you just repeated most of what I said above and then made a conclusion that is ludicrously false.  Section 232...

It is absolutely not incorrect and you just repeated most of what I said above and then made a conclusion that is ludicrously false.  Section 232 is the tariffs on steel, aluminum, copper and patented pharmaceuticals put in place by trump in 2026, that I mentioned above. Most of us talking in this thread are not importing raw steel or copper, we are talking small motorcycle parts, with the exception of the Luxon post as he was probably importing aluminum stock. But if you think that my $2 stickers from the UK were a matter of national security and felt so strongly that you had to post about it, then that is quite a wacky response.  With the exception of the Luxon post, what most of us are being affected by is the abolishment of the 1938 De Minimis Exception rule which now causes every item, regardless of value, to have to undergo customs valuation review and processing and thus the brokerage fees being charged by the shipping companies.

Nearly all of our raw materials are made in the USA, so we haven't paid any direct tariffs on that. All those US made material prices jumped significantly as a result of tariffs, but no direct tariffs on them. 

All of the tariffs we've been charged for are for finished goods like bearings, seals, bolts, tooling, etc. Most of those are primarily made of steel or aluminum, so we get hit with the steel/aluminum tariff on top of the other tariffs. They're also a "national security concern", of course, so we get that tariff too. Plus some others, usually. We certainly wouldn't want to empower our enemies by purchasing KTM steering bearings, now would we?

FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc. are really backlogged on billing and are still billing for the now deemed illegal tariffs as they had to pay for them and need to pass on the charges. If (and that's a big if) those tariffs are refunded, then FedEx, etc. will supposedly refund the tariffs to those who paid. I doubt that will ever happen. 

The de minimis change is annoying as it's overwhelmed customs with lots of small value items that they now have to deal with. It may make generate more tariff income, but I'd bet that income is lost and then some in administrative costs of dealing with it in the first place. 

There are new tariffs to replace the illegal tariffs, and at the end of the day, a tariff is a tariff is a tax on all of us Americans. And we pay for it in the end. 

23
2
RDnutz
Posts
552
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO US
4/14/2026 11:53am

the di minimis shipping loophole had been abused for years by sellers in China flooding eBay and other sites with cheap goods in the Speedpak envelopes. That is why it was targeted I believe. Commerce has changed radically since 1938 with the internet and online global marketplaces. Maybe they should have revamped it instead, but it is what it is...

7
Robgvx
Posts
3987
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
4/14/2026 6:47pm
RDnutz wrote:
the di minimis shipping loophole had been abused for years by sellers in China flooding eBay and other sites with cheap goods in the Speedpak envelopes...

the di minimis shipping loophole had been abused for years by sellers in China flooding eBay and other sites with cheap goods in the Speedpak envelopes. That is why it was targeted I believe. Commerce has changed radically since 1938 with the internet and online global marketplaces. Maybe they should have revamped it instead, but it is what it is...

The de minimis exclusion was surely based on the premise that it costs more to process and collect tariffs on small value items than the tariff is actually worth?  Collecting tariffs on a $2 import is ridiculous. 

8
3
bvm111
Posts
10073
Joined
7/1/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV US
4/14/2026 8:48pm
There are tariffs, duties and fees that used to exempt on lower value items.  All of trumps new tariff's from the 2025 Emergency Economic Powers Act...

There are tariffs, duties and fees that used to exempt on lower value items.  All of trumps new tariff's from the 2025 Emergency Economic Powers Act have stopped. However, additional tariffs trump created in 2026 on steel, aluminum, copper and patented pharmaceuticals are still in effect. These tariffs are as high as 100%! Nevertheless, trump did other things related to trade that are still in effect and hurting US consumers like I mentioned with the De Minimis Exception rule.  Most of us little guys in the US never paid an extra dime on small items we bought overseas. I never did once in my entire life until now and I am an old man. 

What is med/ heavy PTS?

Timo wrote:
25% Tariff: Applies to imports of Class 3 through Class 8 medium- and heavy-duty trucks and specific parts, including engines, transmissions, tires, and chassis.Effective November 1...

25% Tariff: Applies to imports of Class 3 through Class 8 medium- and heavy-duty trucks and specific parts, including engines, transmissions, tires, and chassis.

Effective November 1, 2025, the United States imposed new Section 232 tariffs on imported Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles (MHDVs), associated parts (MHDVPs), and buses. These duties, designed to address national security concerns regarding import dependency, are in addition to any other existing taxes or fees.

At the same time Cash Patel purchased that fleet of BMW SUVs from overseas!  I thought all government vehicles were supposed to be from domestic companies...

At the same time Cash Patel purchased that fleet of BMW SUVs from overseas!  I thought all government vehicles were supposed to be from domestic companies. The hypocrisy never ceases to amaze us.

All BMW X vehicles are built at the BMW Group Plant Spartanburg in Greer, South Carolina! 

1
7
4/14/2026 9:06pm
Buy your parts from USA dealers. The tariffs have already been paid by the distributor (at wholesale prices), it ends up being cheaper for the consumer...

Buy your parts from USA dealers. The tariffs have already been paid by the distributor (at wholesale prices), it ends up being cheaper for the consumer, and you’re supporting American small businesses.


If it looks like the parts are cheaper to buy abroad, this is why. It’s an illusion.

It’s not made in America moron… read the whole post before regurgitating faux news 

4
5
4/14/2026 9:16pm Edited Date/Time 4/14/2026 9:31pm
Buy your parts from USA dealers. The tariffs have already been paid by the distributor (at wholesale prices), it ends up being cheaper for the consumer...

Buy your parts from USA dealers. The tariffs have already been paid by the distributor (at wholesale prices), it ends up being cheaper for the consumer, and you’re supporting American small businesses.


If it looks like the parts are cheaper to buy abroad, this is why. It’s an illusion.

It’s not made in America moron… read the whole post before regurgitating faux news 

Do you think that USA dealers only sell USA made parts? Clearly my post went over your head.


Let’s say you buy a Regina chain from a webshop in Italy because it’s $20 cheaper.. And then find out later that you actually paid more than if you’d bought it at a dealer in the USA. You thought they were fucking you on the price but these costs / fees were baked in, so you fucked yourself instead. You went out of your way to not support a local business, sent your money overseas, and it cost you more. Meanwhile a local dealer, who paid up front to have that part in stock for their customers, continues to sit on unsold inventory. They already paid for a portion of the tariffs that you just paid. Who’s the winner in this scenario?


Obviously this rule doesn’t always apply, there’s nobody selling YZF passenger pegs here.. That particular example is not what I was referring to, but it applies to a lot of other examples here in this thread.

2
6
kage173
Posts
2942
Joined
11/27/2015
Location
TX US
4/15/2026 7:33am Edited Date/Time 4/15/2026 7:41am
kage173 wrote:

Take the pegs down to a competent machine shop and have 100 sets made. Start selling them. You have a baked in competitive advantage. 

soggy wrote:

We’ve gone full circle and now people are advocating stealing IP like they hate on China for doing. 

Are they patented? Is there trade secret in the manufacturing process? Are they made from a proprietary compound formulated by aliens? What IP is being stolen?

Admit that you don't know. 

6
yak651
Posts
8551
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI US
Fantasy
4/15/2026 7:39am
RDnutz wrote:
the di minimis shipping loophole had been abused for years by sellers in China flooding eBay and other sites with cheap goods in the Speedpak envelopes...

the di minimis shipping loophole had been abused for years by sellers in China flooding eBay and other sites with cheap goods in the Speedpak envelopes. That is why it was targeted I believe. Commerce has changed radically since 1938 with the internet and online global marketplaces. Maybe they should have revamped it instead, but it is what it is...

Robgvx wrote:
The de minimis exclusion was surely based on the premise that it costs more to process and collect tariffs on small value items than the tariff...

The de minimis exclusion was surely based on the premise that it costs more to process and collect tariffs on small value items than the tariff is actually worth?  Collecting tariffs on a $2 import is ridiculous. 

But we’re getting a $2k rebate!!!

1
2
soggy
Posts
8414
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
UT US
4/15/2026 7:45am
kage173 wrote:

Take the pegs down to a competent machine shop and have 100 sets made. Start selling them. You have a baked in competitive advantage. 

soggy wrote:

We’ve gone full circle and now people are advocating stealing IP like they hate on China for doing. 

kage173 wrote:
Are they patented? Is there trade secret in the manufacturing process? Are they made from a proprietary compound formulated by aliens? What IP is being stolen?Admit...

Are they patented? Is there trade secret in the manufacturing process? Are they made from a proprietary compound formulated by aliens? What IP is being stolen?

Admit that you don't know. 

It doesn’t appear that they do in a quick search. 

Still think it would be a scummy move. 

1
3
RDnutz
Posts
552
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO US
4/15/2026 8:04am
Robgvx wrote:
The de minimis exclusion was surely based on the premise that it costs more to process and collect tariffs on small value items than the tariff...

The de minimis exclusion was surely based on the premise that it costs more to process and collect tariffs on small value items than the tariff is actually worth?  Collecting tariffs on a $2 import is ridiculous. 

tariff refund system in place, operational starting April 20...

US set to launch tariff refund system on April 20

 

1
Jkawi
Posts
410
Joined
3/5/2015
Location
CA
4/15/2026 8:07am
Hey guys, these are NOT tariffs, the trump tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court and most have been put on hold. However, few people...

Hey guys, these are NOT tariffs, the trump tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court and most have been put on hold. However, few people know that in further screwing US consumers over, in addition the tariffs, the trump administration changed other customs rules that really pick our pockets. The rule they got rid of was the "De Minimis Exemption" rule put in place in 1938.  Previously, small imported items with a value of less than $800 did not face a customs valuation and went straight to your doorstep w/o additional fees. Trump removed that very sensible De Minimis Exemption rule and anything with a value of one cent or more faces customs valuations (even though there are no tariffs as they have been deemed illegal) and involve paperwork for which the shipping companies can charge us exorbitant brokerage fees.  I recently bought a $2 decal from the UK and a month later, Fed-ex sent a bill for me to pay $65 in brokerage fees! An $80 item I bought from Italy, UPS demanded I pay $55 in brokerage fees before they would deliver and said they would send it back to Italy if I didn't pay.  If the tariffs were still in place, we would be getting hit with that charge too.  They are really f'ing us over, and it makes no sense for the benefit of the citizens or country as a whole, but some people literally voted for this.

I know this post is going to hurt some people's feelings.

Timo wrote:

These are indeed tariffs, 15% for EU, 25% for med/heavy PTS (this is the one I'm contesting), and a $15 disbursement fee.

They are. Not all tariffs were deemed illegal, and he has imposed more under different laws. Only the ones implemented under the emergencies act were deemed illegal. This is going to be a mess to unwind within your country, that is for certain. 

1
1
Jkawi
Posts
410
Joined
3/5/2015
Location
CA
4/15/2026 8:12am
Hey guys, these are NOT tariffs, the trump tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court and most have been put on hold. However, few people...

Hey guys, these are NOT tariffs, the trump tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court and most have been put on hold. However, few people know that in further screwing US consumers over, in addition the tariffs, the trump administration changed other customs rules that really pick our pockets. The rule they got rid of was the "De Minimis Exemption" rule put in place in 1938.  Previously, small imported items with a value of less than $800 did not face a customs valuation and went straight to your doorstep w/o additional fees. Trump removed that very sensible De Minimis Exemption rule and anything with a value of one cent or more faces customs valuations (even though there are no tariffs as they have been deemed illegal) and involve paperwork for which the shipping companies can charge us exorbitant brokerage fees.  I recently bought a $2 decal from the UK and a month later, Fed-ex sent a bill for me to pay $65 in brokerage fees! An $80 item I bought from Italy, UPS demanded I pay $55 in brokerage fees before they would deliver and said they would send it back to Italy if I didn't pay.  If the tariffs were still in place, we would be getting hit with that charge too.  They are really f'ing us over, and it makes no sense for the benefit of the citizens or country as a whole, but some people literally voted for this.

I know this post is going to hurt some people's feelings.

Timo wrote:

These are indeed tariffs, 15% for EU, 25% for med/heavy PTS (this is the one I'm contesting), and a $15 disbursement fee.

There are tariffs, duties and fees that used to exempt on lower value items.  All of trumps new tariff's from the 2025 Emergency Economic Powers Act...

There are tariffs, duties and fees that used to exempt on lower value items.  All of trumps new tariff's from the 2025 Emergency Economic Powers Act have stopped. However, additional tariffs trump created in 2026 on steel, aluminum, copper and patented pharmaceuticals are still in effect. These tariffs are as high as 100%! Nevertheless, trump did other things related to trade that are still in effect and hurting US consumers like I mentioned with the De Minimis Exception rule.  Most of us little guys in the US never paid an extra dime on small items we bought overseas. I never did once in my entire life until now and I am an old man. 

What is med/ heavy PTS?

This guy gets it...

1
2
Jkawi
Posts
410
Joined
3/5/2015
Location
CA
4/15/2026 8:14am
eeazye wrote:
I’m sure like most of us, I was surprised when a tariff bill showed up over a month after ordering graphics from a European company. It...

I’m sure like most of us, I was surprised when a tariff bill showed up over a month after ordering graphics from a European company. It wasn’t the amount, it was the unexpectedness of it weeks later. 

I looked up the info fedex was sending because honestly it felt like a scam. They only showed a picture of the package as it was left on the porch, no information about what it was for. After confirming it was legit i paid it, thankfully wasn’t too much. But I think that’s the part that didn’t sit well, it was a really long time before the bill showed up. But, I’m sure there’s lots of red tape. I can’t even imagine what a pita is it for fedex and whomever else. 

And, unfortunately while this is a great company to do business with, when I’m ready for graphics again i will go shopping stateside to avoid this mess. Guess the the theory is working…

yak651 wrote:

So honest question. You already have the goods, what happens if you don’t pay it? They take them back? Put a lien against your home? 

They will send it to collections and it will go against your borrowing ability. 

1
Jkawi
Posts
410
Joined
3/5/2015
Location
CA
4/15/2026 8:18am
Huevos450R wrote:
This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national...

This is incorrect. Trump's IEPA tariffs were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. What this item is falling under is Section 232, which is a national security order that Trump has in place.

If your goods are covered by a Section 232 order, the tariff applies from dollar one, regardless of the shipment's value.. 

 

Robgvx wrote:

Dirt bike passenger foot pegs a national security issue. Who knew?

That is literally the thought process. It is a national security issue for the economy and because there was trade deficits with less populous countries (no shit, duh). Literally what Trump says.

1
6
Jkawi
Posts
410
Joined
3/5/2015
Location
CA
4/15/2026 8:21am
It is absolutely not incorrect and you just repeated most of what I said above and then made a conclusion that is ludicrously false.  Section 232...

It is absolutely not incorrect and you just repeated most of what I said above and then made a conclusion that is ludicrously false.  Section 232 is the tariffs on steel, aluminum, copper and patented pharmaceuticals put in place by trump in 2026, that I mentioned above. Most of us talking in this thread are not importing raw steel or copper, we are talking small motorcycle parts, with the exception of the Luxon post as he was probably importing aluminum stock. But if you think that my $2 stickers from the UK were a matter of national security and felt so strongly that you had to post about it, then that is quite a wacky response.  With the exception of the Luxon post, what most of us are being affected by is the abolishment of the 1938 De Minimis Exception rule which now causes every item, regardless of value, to have to undergo customs valuation review and processing and thus the brokerage fees being charged by the shipping companies.

Luxon MX wrote:
Nearly all of our raw materials are made in the USA, so we haven't paid any direct tariffs on that. All those US made material prices...

Nearly all of our raw materials are made in the USA, so we haven't paid any direct tariffs on that. All those US made material prices jumped significantly as a result of tariffs, but no direct tariffs on them. 

All of the tariffs we've been charged for are for finished goods like bearings, seals, bolts, tooling, etc. Most of those are primarily made of steel or aluminum, so we get hit with the steel/aluminum tariff on top of the other tariffs. They're also a "national security concern", of course, so we get that tariff too. Plus some others, usually. We certainly wouldn't want to empower our enemies by purchasing KTM steering bearings, now would we?

FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc. are really backlogged on billing and are still billing for the now deemed illegal tariffs as they had to pay for them and need to pass on the charges. If (and that's a big if) those tariffs are refunded, then FedEx, etc. will supposedly refund the tariffs to those who paid. I doubt that will ever happen. 

The de minimis change is annoying as it's overwhelmed customs with lots of small value items that they now have to deal with. It may make generate more tariff income, but I'd bet that income is lost and then some in administrative costs of dealing with it in the first place. 

There are new tariffs to replace the illegal tariffs, and at the end of the day, a tariff is a tariff is a tax on all of us Americans. And we pay for it in the end. 

Excellent summary.

1
1
AirtimeAl
Posts
19
Joined
11/29/2020
Location
CA
4/15/2026 8:21am

Sounds like we should take up yard sale bicycling. The only affordable 2 wheel option left. 🖕maga policies. 

5
6
Johnny Ringo
Posts
7874
Joined
1/11/2016
Location
Tombstone, AZ US
4/15/2026 9:49am
eeazye wrote:
I’m sure like most of us, I was surprised when a tariff bill showed up over a month after ordering graphics from a European company. It...

I’m sure like most of us, I was surprised when a tariff bill showed up over a month after ordering graphics from a European company. It wasn’t the amount, it was the unexpectedness of it weeks later. 

I looked up the info fedex was sending because honestly it felt like a scam. They only showed a picture of the package as it was left on the porch, no information about what it was for. After confirming it was legit i paid it, thankfully wasn’t too much. But I think that’s the part that didn’t sit well, it was a really long time before the bill showed up. But, I’m sure there’s lots of red tape. I can’t even imagine what a pita is it for fedex and whomever else. 

And, unfortunately while this is a great company to do business with, when I’m ready for graphics again i will go shopping stateside to avoid this mess. Guess the the theory is working…

yak651 wrote:

So honest question. You already have the goods, what happens if you don’t pay it? They take them back? Put a lien against your home? 

Jkawi wrote:

They will send it to collections and it will go against your borrowing ability. 

Did they send it via certified mail? Can’t prove I received it

1
BobPA
Posts
8321
Joined
10/31/2013
Location
PA US
4/15/2026 10:27am

Just pay your tariff bill with your DOGE refund....

11
3
Jkawi
Posts
410
Joined
3/5/2015
Location
CA
4/15/2026 10:45am
yak651 wrote:

So honest question. You already have the goods, what happens if you don’t pay it? They take them back? Put a lien against your home? 

Jkawi wrote:

They will send it to collections and it will go against your borrowing ability. 

Did they send it via certified mail? Can’t prove I received it

I am sure they will care after they hand it over. Collections will call and use other avenues to make sure you have received the message. Do whatever you want, But I would rather be fighting over my $100 than over my credit score. 

1
2
lumpy790
Posts
11203
Joined
9/18/2007
Location
York, SC US
4/15/2026 11:48am

Received this email from a parts supplier today.

 

Plastics Market Update | April 15, 2026
 
We’ve been in this business for over 60 years, and we’ve never seen this level of sustained uncertainty in the resin market.
 
The Reality
Prices are rising, and the market is moving too quickly to anchor to a single number. What we can say is that, while conditions can change quickly, there are currently no clear signals pointing to near-term price relief, and most industry participants continue to indicate upward pressure in the market.
 
What's Driving it?
The disruption in the Strait of Hormuz removed an estimated 15–20 million barrels per day from the global market in late February. While a ceasefire is in place, infrastructure damage across the region continues to limit supply. Available production is being prioritized toward fuel, leaving plastics feedstock constrained. Even as conditions improve, the backlog will take time to work through.

Current market movement
  • Polyethylene (LDPE & HDPE): up $0.25–$0.40/lb since early March, with an additional $0.10/lb expected in May
  • Polypropylene: March contracts settled up $0.10/lb; spot pricing currently around $0.60/lb
  • Major producers including Dow, ExxonMobil, LyondellBasell, Formosa, and Nova have all implemented increases
 
What this means for your pricing
We are seeing 20–30% increases from most suppliers, with additional increases being announced regularly, before factoring in freight and fuel impacts.
 
 
😱
3
2
otrdave
Posts
63
Joined
5/10/2023
Location
Venice, FL US
Fantasy
1 day ago

Tell them to come get them.

1
yak651
Posts
8551
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI US
Fantasy
1 day ago
lumpy790 wrote:
Received this email from a parts supplier today. Plastics Market Update | April 15, 2026 We’ve been in this business for over 60 years, and we’ve...

Received this email from a parts supplier today.

 

Plastics Market Update | April 15, 2026
 
We’ve been in this business for over 60 years, and we’ve never seen this level of sustained uncertainty in the resin market.
 
The Reality
Prices are rising, and the market is moving too quickly to anchor to a single number. What we can say is that, while conditions can change quickly, there are currently no clear signals pointing to near-term price relief, and most industry participants continue to indicate upward pressure in the market.
 
What's Driving it?
The disruption in the Strait of Hormuz removed an estimated 15–20 million barrels per day from the global market in late February. While a ceasefire is in place, infrastructure damage across the region continues to limit supply. Available production is being prioritized toward fuel, leaving plastics feedstock constrained. Even as conditions improve, the backlog will take time to work through.

Current market movement
  • Polyethylene (LDPE & HDPE): up $0.25–$0.40/lb since early March, with an additional $0.10/lb expected in May
  • Polypropylene: March contracts settled up $0.10/lb; spot pricing currently around $0.60/lb
  • Major producers including Dow, ExxonMobil, LyondellBasell, Formosa, and Nova have all implemented increases
 
What this means for your pricing
We are seeing 20–30% increases from most suppliers, with additional increases being announced regularly, before factoring in freight and fuel impacts.
 
 
😱

🤔

seth505
Posts
10170
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
1 day ago

Geez, some people are so short sighted..."just buy in the USA derp derp". Wait until you find out some companies use a global market, for good reason/necessity and then their employees suffer because said company ended up paying millions in tariffs for the year.  That's not winning.

10
5
jmo443
Posts
1835
Joined
4/5/2019
Location
NY US
1 day ago
RDnutz wrote:
yes. I try order from eBay as much as possible because they require seller to display warning if tariff/customs charges will be due upon receipt. I...

yes. I try order from eBay as much as possible because they require seller to display warning if tariff/customs charges will be due upon receipt. I learned the hard way: ordered a set of JIS Impact bits for $10.00 from a seller in Japan to save 50c over another seller with same item in Utah. Japan seller had 2000 positive feedback so trusted it. When bits arrived it was ins some sketchy "Japan post airmail" (basically a business letter envelope with cardboard to protect part). My mail carrier was a little embarrassed to deliver and came to my door showing the postage due because the letter didn't meet criteria for Air mail because it wouldn't go through automated sorting machine. Extra $ due was $18.00! so I refused delivery. 

.10 cents to purchase something out of the country. Mind blowing. 

1
jmo443
Posts
1835
Joined
4/5/2019
Location
NY US
1 day ago

Also, Moto-related is a non-politics zone. Don't even try it. If you'd like to discuss and debate some politics, try Non-Moto. But be aware, non-moto has its own guidelines as well which you can find if you venture there. Also, COVID and vaccine related topics are 100% off limits in any area of the forum.

For some reason Mav didn’t post this in here…. 

1
18
kawasa84
Posts
1716
Joined
6/7/2008
Location
Flower Mound, TX US
1 day ago
There are tariffs, duties and fees that used to exempt on lower value items.  All of trumps new tariff's from the 2025 Emergency Economic Powers Act...

There are tariffs, duties and fees that used to exempt on lower value items.  All of trumps new tariff's from the 2025 Emergency Economic Powers Act have stopped. However, additional tariffs trump created in 2026 on steel, aluminum, copper and patented pharmaceuticals are still in effect. These tariffs are as high as 100%! Nevertheless, trump did other things related to trade that are still in effect and hurting US consumers like I mentioned with the De Minimis Exception rule.  Most of us little guys in the US never paid an extra dime on small items we bought overseas. I never did once in my entire life until now and I am an old man. 

What is med/ heavy PTS?

Timo wrote:
25% Tariff: Applies to imports of Class 3 through Class 8 medium- and heavy-duty trucks and specific parts, including engines, transmissions, tires, and chassis.Effective November 1...

25% Tariff: Applies to imports of Class 3 through Class 8 medium- and heavy-duty trucks and specific parts, including engines, transmissions, tires, and chassis.

Effective November 1, 2025, the United States imposed new Section 232 tariffs on imported Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles (MHDVs), associated parts (MHDVPs), and buses. These duties, designed to address national security concerns regarding import dependency, are in addition to any other existing taxes or fees.

At the same time Cash Patel purchased that fleet of BMW SUVs from overseas!  I thought all government vehicles were supposed to be from domestic companies...

At the same time Cash Patel purchased that fleet of BMW SUVs from overseas!  I thought all government vehicles were supposed to be from domestic companies. The hypocrisy never ceases to amaze us.

Watch the news video clips of the East wing of the Whitehouse being torn down for the "ballroom".  In those clips that made the news months ago doing the demolition was large Volvo backhoes.  American companies Caterpillar and John Deere make these same large backhoes. Yet the administration and Whitehouse could only contract with a company using Swedish backhoes! I know someone can find and post if you want. The realities and optics really suck and no one seems to be paying attention. 

Also, I do want to say, nothing against our Swedish brethren either!

6
1

Post a reply to: Ordered Part, received bill from FedEx for CBP 2 months later

The Latest