Proposal for lappers issue

Metz8320
Posts
16
Joined
9/16/2022
Location
Clarksburg, PA US
3/9/2026 2:09pm

Did we not just see them completely fuck up the Red Cross flag two weeks ago? And then apparently they didn’t throw it this week when it was needed? We gonna trust them to get that flag right??

1
2
3/9/2026 2:20pm
usp4u1 wrote:

Let me offer another option:

 

Tough fucking titties, its racing.

It's not. To act like the privateers are in the same "race" as the factory guys is disingenuous

6
3/9/2026 2:44pm
My simple solution is you race until you are a lap down then you are done and locked into that position. You will see less guys...

My simple solution is you race until you are a lap down then you are done and locked into that position. You will see less guys just rolling as each position pays more. 

Pretty much the same as the suggestion 

2
Tiki
Posts
10568
Joined
8/1/2006
Location
Corona, CA US
Fantasy
3/9/2026 5:24pm

Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.

Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost thousands over while the rest of the field is barely running kit suspension. 

The solution might be taking away that handmade suspension. What if everyone was on showroom-stock bikes? Would the lappers still be that much of a problem? If I were the AMA, that's exactly the direction I would go. Start with the rulebook.

2
9

The Shop

ando
Posts
4102
Joined
8/20/2009
Location
Perth AU
3/9/2026 7:01pm
Ok, here's a concept. Beginning upon completion of lap 5, the last place rider in the field is eliminated (black flagged) each lap. I  say lap...

Ok, here's a concept. Beginning upon completion of lap 5, the last place rider in the field is eliminated (black flagged) each lap. I  say lap 5 because if someone falls at the start they have 5 laps to move forward. Do this until there are the final 10. Let them finish as a 10 rider field. 

KennyT wrote:
What happens if Eli Tomac tips over in a corner on lap 5 and drops to 22 before he puts in a charge into the top...

What happens if Eli Tomac tips over in a corner on lap 5 and drops to 22 before he puts in a charge into the top 3? 

This is why the black flag/drop off option is not the right answer.

1
Danny818
Posts
136
Joined
1/7/2022
Location
Canoga Park, CA US
3/9/2026 9:22pm

Tell the leaders to slow down or speed limit signs, easy Peezy

Danny818
Posts
136
Joined
1/7/2022
Location
Canoga Park, CA US
3/9/2026 9:22pm

Or no passing signs!

Shred
Posts
1506
Joined
10/21/2021
Location
Brighton, CO US
Fantasy
3/9/2026 9:34pm

I posted this on the 107% thread…

I don’t think it is a 107 problem/solution.  It is an individual rider problem.  The stupid points thing is not working.  Fines are tough due to massive differences in pay.  How about a one race suspension for the first infraction, 2 races for the second infraction, and 5 for the third.  That proportionally hits the wallet of riders if they are not paid for that/those race/s.  After that make it a Season suspension to include the number in to the next season.  Do this and riders will take it very serious and gtfootw.  You see…with the 107 rule then some repeat offenders, like Friese, will still make it.  In fact…faster lappers are the hardest to pass…and if they don’t get out of the way it really screws some riders disproportionately.  There are riders that wouldn’t make the 107 that are very respectful of the blue flag.  This keeps the gate full and opens opportunities to riders that ride right.  All of this would depend on the AMA enforcing it so at this point….nothing will make sense….just like the AMA.  

btw….every one of the “problem” riders, 4 that were named,  would have made the main this week under a 107 rule….food for thought.

1
8tensolutions
Posts
3301
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT US
3/9/2026 10:20pm
Tiki wrote:
Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost...

Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.

Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost thousands over while the rest of the field is barely running kit suspension. 

The solution might be taking away that handmade suspension. What if everyone was on showroom-stock bikes? Would the lappers still be that much of a problem? If I were the AMA, that's exactly the direction I would go. Start with the rulebook.

Showroom stock bikes would be incredibly dangerous.  It's not the bike itself that makes the largest difference at the factory level, it's the guys turning the wrenches and programming the electronics.  

1
mark_swart
Posts
2524
Joined
11/2/2011
Location
Chapin, SC US
3/10/2026 1:09pm

My solution, it would be an SX-only rule: 

Riders receiving blue flags will move to the left half of the track until the lapping riders are clear. 

Why it works: 

- Removes interpretation for what the "race line" is. Leaders can still go where they want (at their own risk), but will always know the right is clear in lapping situations

- Allows both leaders and lappers consistency, and they all can plan race strategy and line choice around it. Yes, this impacts optimum line choice for leaders, but that is already happening and continually turns out bad. This way less chaotic for them than trying to guess what the lappers are thinking.

- Allows lappers to continue their races for position on the left half of the track. 

- Enables cut and dry decisions for penalties based on AMA review of recordings. 

This may not be as perfect as everyone having telepathy, but I think it's a solid, straightforward solution that could be applied consistently and objectively. No extra equipment, no lap time analysis or math, no split second midair guesswork, easy penalty decisions. 

Lappers to the left in SX!!

3
3
ando
Posts
4102
Joined
8/20/2009
Location
Perth AU
3/10/2026 3:08pm

You could argue that the LCQ is making the situation worse.  We run two heats to see who the the fastest 18 riders are, then we run an LCQ to allow four more really slow guys into the main.

How about an alternative:

Run 22 rider heats; take the top eight from each of the heats, with a provisional allowance for up to two top ten riders who didn’t make the top eight in their heat.  You end up with a 16-18 rider main event.

Get rid of the LCQ, run a B main with the 12 guys who missed the cut plus maybe the next four fastest qualifiers.

Two mains with only 16 riders means the track gets slightly less worn during the night.  Also fewer riders means the starts are likely to be a bit safer.

The good B main guys get more exposure than they would by running around in 17-22 place in the A main.  

Same amount of racing so the TV schedule is not impacted.

Oh and actually enforce the blue flag rules with meaningful penalties.

4
2
super_fan_38
Posts
245
Joined
9/25/2025
Location
Oak Harbor, WA US
3/10/2026 3:16pm

Here is a privateer's response:

648486875 928530126490664 6338843182929393398 n

1
10
Shred
Posts
1506
Joined
10/21/2021
Location
Brighton, CO US
Fantasy
3/10/2026 3:20pm

I have the solution.  Mount a paint ball gun next to the upper front fender near the leader lights and holeshot devices(call it the worthless shit area).  Have a button on the bars and when the leaders catch the lappers if they can get a paintball shot on them then that lapper is out of the race.

Friese after first practice with new anti-lapper system.

IMG 2052 2.jpeg?VersionId=.bwJVY7.fK6kDqaj.4TNrPKQ
2
umagumadog
Posts
1267
Joined
10/29/2006
Location
GA US
3/10/2026 3:53pm

Ban the top five instead of the bottom five and let’s get back to watching good racing. 

1
6
3/10/2026 4:46pm
Here is a privateer's response:

Here is a privateer's response:

648486875 928530126490664 6338843182929393398 n

What other motorsport are these guys referring to? I'm a fan of plenty and lappers causing issues in the battle for lead just never happens in other series. In F1 ignoring the blue flag is a penalty. And drivers aren't getting lapped multiple times like riders do in SX. Reality is these guys should be in a class below the factory riders

5
Tiki
Posts
10568
Joined
8/1/2006
Location
Corona, CA US
Fantasy
3/10/2026 6:19pm
Tiki wrote:
Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost...

Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.

Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost thousands over while the rest of the field is barely running kit suspension. 

The solution might be taking away that handmade suspension. What if everyone was on showroom-stock bikes? Would the lappers still be that much of a problem? If I were the AMA, that's exactly the direction I would go. Start with the rulebook.

Showroom stock bikes would be incredibly dangerous.  It's not the bike itself that makes the largest difference at the factory level, it's the guys turning the...

Showroom stock bikes would be incredibly dangerous.  It's not the bike itself that makes the largest difference at the factory level, it's the guys turning the wrenches and programming the electronics.  

YES, I agree with you, but also the suspension between the privateer and factory is huge. Factory is made from raw billet and hand made, coatings that most people can't afford. Engine mounts that can be changed to suit the track. And as you said tuning. There's a multitude of differences but if it's dangerous, time to change the track. 

The reality is what we all have known and no one will address. Get Freeze the fuck off the track. 

1
8tensolutions
Posts
3301
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT US
3/10/2026 7:42pm
Tiki wrote:
Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost...

Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.

Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost thousands over while the rest of the field is barely running kit suspension. 

The solution might be taking away that handmade suspension. What if everyone was on showroom-stock bikes? Would the lappers still be that much of a problem? If I were the AMA, that's exactly the direction I would go. Start with the rulebook.

Showroom stock bikes would be incredibly dangerous.  It's not the bike itself that makes the largest difference at the factory level, it's the guys turning the...

Showroom stock bikes would be incredibly dangerous.  It's not the bike itself that makes the largest difference at the factory level, it's the guys turning the wrenches and programming the electronics.  

Tiki wrote:
YES, I agree with you, but also the suspension between the privateer and factory is huge. Factory is made from raw billet and hand made, coatings...

YES, I agree with you, but also the suspension between the privateer and factory is huge. Factory is made from raw billet and hand made, coatings that most people can't afford. Engine mounts that can be changed to suit the track. And as you said tuning. There's a multitude of differences but if it's dangerous, time to change the track. 

The reality is what we all have known and no one will address. Get Freeze the fuck off the track. 

I agree on Friese, but in this case the track created it, not Friese.....and he finished 12th.  Hard to say we should not allow 12th place to line up.

Leveling the bikes stifles development and makes the dreams of a factory ride far less glamorous.  The factory suspension is a big advantage and even the "rules" of the 250 class suspension do not keep it attainable.  Regardless, this has nothing to do with lappers and they weren't an issue all year until this week's race.  It was a perfect storm of short lap times and treacherous conditions making the gap from the top to bottom much greater.

1
2
Kenny Banyan
Posts
2954
Joined
6/2/2024
Location
Seattle, WA US
3/10/2026 8:03pm
Tiki wrote:
Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost...

Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.

Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost thousands over while the rest of the field is barely running kit suspension. 

The solution might be taking away that handmade suspension. What if everyone was on showroom-stock bikes? Would the lappers still be that much of a problem? If I were the AMA, that's exactly the direction I would go. Start with the rulebook.

Good post….💯👍🏻

1
2
mx691
Posts
879
Joined
6/27/2008
Location
Stockholm SE
Fantasy
3/12/2026 5:51am

Maybe Eli and Hunter should be smart enough to not pass a lapper on a such difficult track (where riders are shot anywhere by the ruts) in the middle of a tripple jump section! FFS!

Pass them in a turn!

In Mario cart there will be bananapeels, face it!

Whats next, give the top 5-in points separate qualifying runs ala superpole because ”people are in the way”? Part of the sport is to figure out a good moment to put in a hot lap and also to pass lappers in a safe way, probably not in the air over a supercross triple…

Change this = ruin the sport.

(Ok, Friese may be being involved a bit to often)

1
3
3/12/2026 10:11am

It's not rocket science...

Lappers are a part of the sport. They add to the excitement.

Lappers need to yield to the faster riders through the blue flag rules.

Rules need to be enforced.

Solution is easy, BLACK FLAG STOP AND GO penalty for the offenders.

 

If you want to see how fast the leaders can go unaffected, watch qualifying practice or start a time trials series, IDK... Lappers are a part of the race and strategy for moving through the pack makes the sport fun to watch.

 

1
1
3/12/2026 10:19am
Tiki wrote:
Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost...

Here's a concept: Harden the fuck up.

Or create a series just for the top 5. Because those are the guys complaining. They're on bikes that cost thousands over while the rest of the field is barely running kit suspension. 

The solution might be taking away that handmade suspension. What if everyone was on showroom-stock bikes? Would the lappers still be that much of a problem? If I were the AMA, that's exactly the direction I would go. Start with the rulebook.

The top guys would still be winning if everyone was on equal equipment. It also doesn’t even address the issue of guys like Friese cross jumping people because they have no care for anyone out there but themselves.

mikelawlor
Posts
170
Joined
12/4/2022
Location
Johnsonville, NY US
3/12/2026 10:20am

Have two sections of the track that are split lanes and ones you go a lap down the lappers are assigned one side of the split lane and riders on the lead lap are assigned the other side. Have two sections like this about half a lap apart and it would remove the clutter and give riders a chance to get by uninterrupted. If a lapped rider doesn’t take the right lane they loose a position every lap they don’t comply. 

2
3/12/2026 10:51am Edited Date/Time 3/12/2026 10:51am

Sometimes I wonder if most of these people proposing ideas to remedy the lapper situation on here have ever actually even raced a dirt bike before. 

4
mx317
Posts
5281
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TN US
3/12/2026 11:06am
Rickyisms wrote:

Sometimes I wonder if most of these people proposing ideas to remedy the lapper situation on here have ever actually even raced a dirt bike before. 

I have never seen so many stupid ideas as this week.

1
ARM670
Posts
2081
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH US
3/12/2026 11:09am
mark_swart wrote:
My solution, it would be an SX-only rule: Riders receiving blue flags will move to the left half of the track until the lapping riders are...

My solution, it would be an SX-only rule: 

Riders receiving blue flags will move to the left half of the track until the lapping riders are clear. 

Why it works: 

- Removes interpretation for what the "race line" is. Leaders can still go where they want (at their own risk), but will always know the right is clear in lapping situations

- Allows both leaders and lappers consistency, and they all can plan race strategy and line choice around it. Yes, this impacts optimum line choice for leaders, but that is already happening and continually turns out bad. This way less chaotic for them than trying to guess what the lappers are thinking.

- Allows lappers to continue their races for position on the left half of the track. 

- Enables cut and dry decisions for penalties based on AMA review of recordings. 

This may not be as perfect as everyone having telepathy, but I think it's a solid, straightforward solution that could be applied consistently and objectively. No extra equipment, no lap time analysis or math, no split second midair guesswork, easy penalty decisions. 

Lappers to the left in SX!!

Isn't that what Vince did when he hit Eli?  In all seriousness that makes the tracks narrower than they already arr

ricky racer
Posts
265
Joined
12/25/2011
Location
Niles, MI US
3/12/2026 6:26pm

 Maybe..... Forget revving the engine and install air horns? Why not??

 

Air Horn Twin Tone Snail Air Horn12V 105db, Dual Tone Electric Snail Air Horn , Eletric Horn Dual Tone Electric Snail Air Horn for Car Motorcycle Scooters ATV SUV Moped Go-Kart Dirt Bike

1
3/12/2026 6:30pm

The funny thing about the Red Cross flag and the blue flag is that they already exist.  Follow the rules consistently.  If they can’t see the flag, put an LED light strip the color of the flag on the handle.  Then enforce following the flags.


We don’t need coms.  We don’t need new rules or less riders in mains.  Just make the flags slightly more obvious and enforce following them.  It’s so simple. 

1
Sully
Posts
9147
Joined
8/24/2006
Location
JP
3/12/2026 8:22pm

I don't have a solution to the lappers, but I will say if you go 2 laps down it should be an automatic black flag. You can get lapped and still be in a race, but if the lappers are lapping you, you're not racing anyone and don't belong out there.

1
3/12/2026 9:21pm
Rickyisms wrote:

Maybe if someone posts this idea one more time it’ll come true!

30minmotos wrote:
Maybe the inbreds who run it will read this shit, I’ve defintly heard several things that are said on here, get brought up on pulp many...

Maybe the inbreds who run it will read this shit, I’ve defintly heard several things that are said on here, get brought up on pulp many times not in a negative way, so we have to give these idiots the right ideas or they’ll go and do something dumb like make a guy who can’t speak English an announcer on tv or something!

Rickyisms wrote:
Maybe I’m an inbred but it just gets tiring with the 10+ threads all with the same ideas that have been pandered about for 10 years...

Maybe I’m an inbred but it just gets tiring with the 10+ threads all with the same ideas that have been pandered about for 10 years. I grew up around and participating in all forms of motorsports, lappers have always just been part of racing to me.

I do think the AMA needs to be harsher with handing out penalties on glaring offenders (like Friese), but if they’re going to do that they need to have legitimate flaggers who will actually display the blue flag properly, rather than a fan who got plucked from their local riding club and now they’re too star struck to throw a flag because they’re on the floor of an SX race.


If we did eliminate 1 rider per lap, everyone would love it until someone like Tomac gets plucked like he would’ve at Glendale after going down in the 1st turn, and then everyone would be asking for it to be reversed to the traditional format. 

#stopinbredhate

1
mark_swart
Posts
2524
Joined
11/2/2011
Location
Chapin, SC US
3/13/2026 1:28pm
mark_swart wrote:
My solution, it would be an SX-only rule: Riders receiving blue flags will move to the left half of the track until the lapping riders are...

My solution, it would be an SX-only rule: 

Riders receiving blue flags will move to the left half of the track until the lapping riders are clear. 

Why it works: 

- Removes interpretation for what the "race line" is. Leaders can still go where they want (at their own risk), but will always know the right is clear in lapping situations

- Allows both leaders and lappers consistency, and they all can plan race strategy and line choice around it. Yes, this impacts optimum line choice for leaders, but that is already happening and continually turns out bad. This way less chaotic for them than trying to guess what the lappers are thinking.

- Allows lappers to continue their races for position on the left half of the track. 

- Enables cut and dry decisions for penalties based on AMA review of recordings. 

This may not be as perfect as everyone having telepathy, but I think it's a solid, straightforward solution that could be applied consistently and objectively. No extra equipment, no lap time analysis or math, no split second midair guesswork, easy penalty decisions. 

Lappers to the left in SX!!

ARM670 wrote:

Isn't that what Vince did when he hit Eli?  In all seriousness that makes the tracks narrower than they already arr

Not really since the track was open and Eli would have had no way of knowing if Vince intended to be left or to move left. If that rule was in place, Eli would have known Vince was required to be on the left and if he had taken the right it would have been clear. And it's only narrower for a brief period during the overtaking. Hunter's incident would have been completely eliminated. At least that's how I think it would have all worked out. I wish we could at least try something instead of watching this same thing happen over and over.

Post a reply to: Proposal for lappers issue

The Latest