Honda CRF Chassis harshness

soggy
Posts
8851
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
1/14/2025 12:49pm
crc245 wrote:
lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If...

lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If on the bubble, weight-wise, the Honda usually prefers a stiffer shock spring and less preload over a heavily tensioned spring. If spring rates have already been updated, what brand? Even springs aren’t apples to apples…

Comparing the RWE and R is fruitless, by the way. 18mm shock shaft, coatings, setup are completely bike specific. You mentioned CRF450 in your original post, just verifying it’s an R and not RWE we’re talking about. 

lowmass wrote:
crf450R  not the WEall stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpackfork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been...

crf450R  not the WE

all stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpack

fork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been from fork at 5mm and sags from 101-108. I find 105 best but 103 is a bit less harsh I have to run the stock forks rebound clicker at only 2-3 out from full hard ( comp clicker does next to nothing stock so using the crossover effect of the rebound circuit to get some comp damp) and added 50cc oil in outers to get a fork that had anywhere near enough hold up to ride the bike at speed. Believe it or not the fork , even in this config, isnt all that bad

Im 182lbs vet expert, I no longer huck the big triples ( can but usually dont) BUT can still give local fast guys a go.  however I dont ride there most of the time. Probably more a fast intermediate AND I dont ride like an old guy. Blessed with a youthful build and I ride light on the bike

Out of all the settings the sag has had the largest effect on the rear ends harshness. Blowing out comp and HS comps on shock can help BUT no control at speed with such a setting and even the stock settings blow through too easily in the deeper power on stuff anyway

Also perhaps important I dont use hands /arms as my strength to hang on. I never get arm pump 

and btw no matter what speed Im at I can feel the rear ends issue. Its not simply overloaded

 

tried the 18mm shock shaft?

2
lowmass
Posts
191
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY, USA
1/14/2025 1:08pm
crc245 wrote:
lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If...

lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If on the bubble, weight-wise, the Honda usually prefers a stiffer shock spring and less preload over a heavily tensioned spring. If spring rates have already been updated, what brand? Even springs aren’t apples to apples…

Comparing the RWE and R is fruitless, by the way. 18mm shock shaft, coatings, setup are completely bike specific. You mentioned CRF450 in your original post, just verifying it’s an R and not RWE we’re talking about. 

lowmass wrote:
crf450R  not the WEall stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpackfork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been...

crf450R  not the WE

all stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpack

fork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been from fork at 5mm and sags from 101-108. I find 105 best but 103 is a bit less harsh I have to run the stock forks rebound clicker at only 2-3 out from full hard ( comp clicker does next to nothing stock so using the crossover effect of the rebound circuit to get some comp damp) and added 50cc oil in outers to get a fork that had anywhere near enough hold up to ride the bike at speed. Believe it or not the fork , even in this config, isnt all that bad

Im 182lbs vet expert, I no longer huck the big triples ( can but usually dont) BUT can still give local fast guys a go.  however I dont ride there most of the time. Probably more a fast intermediate AND I dont ride like an old guy. Blessed with a youthful build and I ride light on the bike

Out of all the settings the sag has had the largest effect on the rear ends harshness. Blowing out comp and HS comps on shock can help BUT no control at speed with such a setting and even the stock settings blow through too easily in the deeper power on stuff anyway

Also perhaps important I dont use hands /arms as my strength to hang on. I never get arm pump 

and btw no matter what speed Im at I can feel the rear ends issue. Its not simply overloaded

 

soggy wrote:

tried the 18mm shock shaft?

no

I suspect that shock has valving to match that shafts extra flow through the high speed comp circuit ?

1
2
28hall
Posts
309
Joined
4/16/2019
Location
AU
1/14/2025 1:09pm

It was said earlier in the thread, Hondas are sprung light. I haven’t ridden the 25 yet but the previous models I would go up one rate in the front and I’m 76kg (167lb) vet A speed. At 182 you will need springs which your fork settings indicate needing stiffer springs. I would go up a rate front and rear first before getting revalved.

 

1
soggy
Posts
8851
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
1/14/2025 1:18pm
lowmass wrote:
crf450R  not the WEall stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpackfork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been...

crf450R  not the WE

all stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpack

fork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been from fork at 5mm and sags from 101-108. I find 105 best but 103 is a bit less harsh I have to run the stock forks rebound clicker at only 2-3 out from full hard ( comp clicker does next to nothing stock so using the crossover effect of the rebound circuit to get some comp damp) and added 50cc oil in outers to get a fork that had anywhere near enough hold up to ride the bike at speed. Believe it or not the fork , even in this config, isnt all that bad

Im 182lbs vet expert, I no longer huck the big triples ( can but usually dont) BUT can still give local fast guys a go.  however I dont ride there most of the time. Probably more a fast intermediate AND I dont ride like an old guy. Blessed with a youthful build and I ride light on the bike

Out of all the settings the sag has had the largest effect on the rear ends harshness. Blowing out comp and HS comps on shock can help BUT no control at speed with such a setting and even the stock settings blow through too easily in the deeper power on stuff anyway

Also perhaps important I dont use hands /arms as my strength to hang on. I never get arm pump 

and btw no matter what speed Im at I can feel the rear ends issue. Its not simply overloaded

 

soggy wrote:

tried the 18mm shock shaft?

lowmass wrote:

no

I suspect that shock has valving to match that shafts extra flow through the high speed comp circuit ?

my b I thought you had tried a bunch of things already. your gonna have to start somewhere since you've kind of run the gamut on the stock settings. I would begin with springs and revalve from a reputable tuner, local preferred. 

2
2

The Shop

Village Idiot
Posts
2622
Joined
5/19/2023
Location
MXoN - a term used by newbs, goobs and rubes, PW, USA
1/14/2025 2:26pm

I'd be curious to see how an 18" rear affects this sensation.

lowmass wrote:

me too. a bit more meat and damp

Yep.

But it's the typical tradeoff scenario - is the exra cush/smoothness more important than rollover/squirm on hardpack corners, etc.? 

1
1
Darrin Willis
Posts
1105
Joined
11/16/2020
Location
Red Deer County, AB, CA
1/14/2025 3:14pm

Im sorry everyone but I really get a kick out of imagining The Hurricane reading this thread. 

lowmass wrote:

what do ya think he would say?

He would tell everyone to pull the tampon out ur assholes and ride ur stinkin bike! I'm sure he would be getting a good laugh. 

1
aees
Posts
2814
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
USA
1/14/2025 4:03pm Edited Date/Time 1/14/2025 4:05pm
crc245 wrote:
lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If...

lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If on the bubble, weight-wise, the Honda usually prefers a stiffer shock spring and less preload over a heavily tensioned spring. If spring rates have already been updated, what brand? Even springs aren’t apples to apples…

Comparing the RWE and R is fruitless, by the way. 18mm shock shaft, coatings, setup are completely bike specific. You mentioned CRF450 in your original post, just verifying it’s an R and not RWE we’re talking about. 

lowmass wrote:
crf450R  not the WEall stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpackfork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been...

crf450R  not the WE

all stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpack

fork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been from fork at 5mm and sags from 101-108. I find 105 best but 103 is a bit less harsh I have to run the stock forks rebound clicker at only 2-3 out from full hard ( comp clicker does next to nothing stock so using the crossover effect of the rebound circuit to get some comp damp) and added 50cc oil in outers to get a fork that had anywhere near enough hold up to ride the bike at speed. Believe it or not the fork , even in this config, isnt all that bad

Im 182lbs vet expert, I no longer huck the big triples ( can but usually dont) BUT can still give local fast guys a go.  however I dont ride there most of the time. Probably more a fast intermediate AND I dont ride like an old guy. Blessed with a youthful build and I ride light on the bike

Out of all the settings the sag has had the largest effect on the rear ends harshness. Blowing out comp and HS comps on shock can help BUT no control at speed with such a setting and even the stock settings blow through too easily in the deeper power on stuff anyway

Also perhaps important I dont use hands /arms as my strength to hang on. I never get arm pump 

and btw no matter what speed Im at I can feel the rear ends issue. Its not simply overloaded

 

My KTM 2022 SXF with 6500 and Xact Pro is unrideable at less than 40mm static hot (42mm cold). That gives around 110-111 sag, but also works great when I'm at those numbers. Same with OEM shock. Smooth tracks, sure anything works. 

38mm hot, and it starts to get harsh, deflects. No matter valving or clickers. You just can't compensate with valving when applying to much preload to spring. 

Drop sag until you feel chassi feels OK over chatter and bumps, then go in on LS and HSC, plus out on rebound until you get balance and ride height back.

There is only one downside to reduxe sag, and that is that frontend will track less, and you will have less pressure on front tire. Some you get back with clickers, but never the same. 

Just dropping sag without compensating clickers only works if the package (spring, valving, clickers) is to stiff to start with. 

When I drop 2mm sag, I go out 1 click on rebound since it slows down, and in ~2-3 clicks LSC. That gives a way smoother ride for exactly what you describe. 

It's also that just dropping sag, can get you on the other end of the spectrum, meaning it gets worse unless some balance is maintained and bought back using LSC/Reb and some HSC if needed. 

 

1
crc245
Posts
1344
Joined
10/29/2007
Location
Yorba Linda, CA, USA
1/14/2025 7:09pm
lowmass wrote:
crf450R  not the WEall stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpackfork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been...

crf450R  not the WE

all stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpack

fork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been from fork at 5mm and sags from 101-108. I find 105 best but 103 is a bit less harsh I have to run the stock forks rebound clicker at only 2-3 out from full hard ( comp clicker does next to nothing stock so using the crossover effect of the rebound circuit to get some comp damp) and added 50cc oil in outers to get a fork that had anywhere near enough hold up to ride the bike at speed. Believe it or not the fork , even in this config, isnt all that bad

Im 182lbs vet expert, I no longer huck the big triples ( can but usually dont) BUT can still give local fast guys a go.  however I dont ride there most of the time. Probably more a fast intermediate AND I dont ride like an old guy. Blessed with a youthful build and I ride light on the bike

Out of all the settings the sag has had the largest effect on the rear ends harshness. Blowing out comp and HS comps on shock can help BUT no control at speed with such a setting and even the stock settings blow through too easily in the deeper power on stuff anyway

Also perhaps important I dont use hands /arms as my strength to hang on. I never get arm pump 

and btw no matter what speed Im at I can feel the rear ends issue. Its not simply overloaded

 

Good info, thanks for the follow-up. Curious how much preload is on your stock rear spring: Sounds like going up a rate will get you closer (free sag and rear end feel) to where you want to be. Between the R and RWE, I greatly preferred the 18mm shaft and base settings of the Works Edition. May be more beneficial to get your R components sprung and valved, just wanted to throw that out there. Also - If running MX34’s, this chassis likes a 120/90 over the stock 120/80 MX33…May have to go from 2mm to flush on the FH to accommodate, but it could also help this back-end sensation you’re struggling with! Cheers and keep us updated

2
lowmass
Posts
191
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY, USA
1/15/2025 6:04am
spacecat wrote:
I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag...

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

how bout it spacecat.  whats the report on the FC mods?  

lowmass
Posts
191
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY, USA
1/15/2025 6:10am
lowmass wrote:
crf450R  not the WEall stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpackfork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been...

crf450R  not the WE

all stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpack

fork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been from fork at 5mm and sags from 101-108. I find 105 best but 103 is a bit less harsh I have to run the stock forks rebound clicker at only 2-3 out from full hard ( comp clicker does next to nothing stock so using the crossover effect of the rebound circuit to get some comp damp) and added 50cc oil in outers to get a fork that had anywhere near enough hold up to ride the bike at speed. Believe it or not the fork , even in this config, isnt all that bad

Im 182lbs vet expert, I no longer huck the big triples ( can but usually dont) BUT can still give local fast guys a go.  however I dont ride there most of the time. Probably more a fast intermediate AND I dont ride like an old guy. Blessed with a youthful build and I ride light on the bike

Out of all the settings the sag has had the largest effect on the rear ends harshness. Blowing out comp and HS comps on shock can help BUT no control at speed with such a setting and even the stock settings blow through too easily in the deeper power on stuff anyway

Also perhaps important I dont use hands /arms as my strength to hang on. I never get arm pump 

and btw no matter what speed Im at I can feel the rear ends issue. Its not simply overloaded

 

crc245 wrote:
Good info, thanks for the follow-up. Curious how much preload is on your stock rear spring: Sounds like going up a rate will get you closer...

Good info, thanks for the follow-up. Curious how much preload is on your stock rear spring: Sounds like going up a rate will get you closer (free sag and rear end feel) to where you want to be. Between the R and RWE, I greatly preferred the 18mm shaft and base settings of the Works Edition. May be more beneficial to get your R components sprung and valved, just wanted to throw that out there. Also - If running MX34’s, this chassis likes a 120/90 over the stock 120/80 MX33…May have to go from 2mm to flush on the FH to accommodate, but it could also help this back-end sensation you’re struggling with! Cheers and keep us updated

thanks

yea I am willing to get the suspension done HOWEVER I have learned the hard way that there are chassis issues out there that suspension cannot fully  cure. I would be fine if there is a setup that at least smashed most of the issue BUT at 1500 $+ I wanted to get as much data as I can before pulling trigger on just any shim shuffler

BTW where I live we ride slot car tracks. Meaning long thin ruts through every turn. I have found on every bike Ive owned I like a 110/90 out back best as it does seem to fight you less at roll over in these situations

1
1
GPrider
Posts
789
Joined
4/10/2014
Location
La Mesa, CA, USA
1/15/2025 7:38am

kinda off subject but personally I think too many guys get caught up with sag numbers. Who cares what number it is. Set it at 105mm at home, cold on a flat surface. Now go ride. then based on how it feels try a half turn one way or another and repeat until you find the sweet spot. Then after you get home and the shock cools, check the sag again and record the number. Just make sure you are wearing basically the same clothes so its apple to apples. If it turns out to be excessive sag one way or the other than you can address spring rate. But, if it feels the best at 109mm, and mxa says it should be 103mm, phuck em!

10
lowmass
Posts
191
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY, USA
1/15/2025 7:52am Edited Date/Time 1/15/2025 8:06am
GPrider wrote:
kinda off subject but personally I think too many guys get caught up with sag numbers. Who cares what number it is. Set it at 105mm...

kinda off subject but personally I think too many guys get caught up with sag numbers. Who cares what number it is. Set it at 105mm at home, cold on a flat surface. Now go ride. then based on how it feels try a half turn one way or another and repeat until you find the sweet spot. Then after you get home and the shock cools, check the sag again and record the number. Just make sure you are wearing basically the same clothes so its apple to apples. If it turns out to be excessive sag one way or the other than you can address spring rate. But, if it feels the best at 109mm, and mxa says it should be 103mm, phuck em!

yes I learned a long time ago to use a sag numbers as a ball park to start BUT always go up and down by feel AND IMO its the most underrated adjustment ever. 

This was learned using a hydraulic preload adjuster on shock with a cable running up to my handle bars so I could adjust sag out on track. That way I didnt have to come in, get tools out, make adjustments, then back out to track. That upset my ability to discern the changes. With that on the fly adjustment I got a much keener sense of the change .

After about a month of use I can now feel 1mm change and no longer need the expensive adjuster

sag is  critical to overall balance and even 1mm can be noticed. I find some bikes go from ok to great with only 1-2mm change. Others dont respond quite that critically. My 2022sxf was very sesative to even 1 mm. The 2025 yamaha is far less sensitive. Still important but very different responses from these two bikes.

AND again dont go strictly by measurement which btw is VERY difficult to get repeatable results with. Just get it somewhere in the ballpark ( I recommend standing on pegs only and balance there. Every other way shows quite inconsistent results  BUT as said, in the end go by feel after ya get it measured.

1
2
prida28
Posts
91
Joined
2/22/2016
Location
Escondido, CA, USA
1/15/2025 9:26am

This has to be one of the better threads on Vital in awhile. A lot of great commentary, thoughts and opinions.

I just picked up a 2025 CRF450 last week and took it out both Saturday and Sunday here in SoCal at Pala (yes, I still call it Pala and not Fox). Everything in this thread is very relatable to what I felt even on the first couple of rides. Coming off a 2024 SXF FE (and 10 years of riding steel frame bikes) I was just looking for a different feel. My last Honda was a 2008 CRF450 so maybe just dreaming of the glory days.

I only have a couple hours on the bike so I am still breaking it it. At 200 lb Vet B rider, I know the springs are soft. My plan is to get the suspension valved and sprung in the next few weeks by RideJBI.

As far as my experience so far, I basically rolled it off the showroom floor and rode the first hour after setting the clickers to some baseline based on Keefer's recommendation. I knew the forks were going to be soft so I left the sag at 118 which is what it was from the show room for me. Even with that much sag, the soft forks did dive really bad off-throttle. The on-throttle feel of the rear end though low, was very stable. The oddest feeling I was feeling from the bike was this very weird kick from the rear off-throttle. I am attributing that do the really soft forks and the lack of hold up.

For day 2 I decided to add 40cc's of oil in each fork leg and added 3 turns of preload to the shock. That got me in the 108-109 range. Both of those really did help balance the bike and prevent the diving/pitching. I was playing around with the fork rebound and seem to battling between too fast as I speed them up to a little harsh as I slowed them down. By the end of the day, I ended up adding another turn of preload (now in the 105-106 range). All that help balance the bike, but I never was able to get rid of the off-throttle kick in the rear end. Not sure if I relate that to harshness of the chassis or suspension setup.

Anyways, again I only have couple hours on the bike so a lot to learn and experiment with. 

Please keep the dialog going. I am interested to hear everyone's thought on the 18mm shock shaft as well as how some of the different suspension shops are improving this machine.

Thanks again!

6
mx317
Posts
5357
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
1/15/2025 9:36am

To my knowledge the 25 WE model has the 18mm shaft. You can buy this from RM Cycle less than what the shops are asking for it. This is the complete shaft, piston, clevis all ready to bolt in. I would clarify it to make sure it would go into your shock body, but both are 50mm so it should work.

52421-K95-AJ1

ROD, PISTON

$485.27

$402.77 their price
 

2
prida28
Posts
91
Joined
2/22/2016
Location
Escondido, CA, USA
1/15/2025 9:46am
mx317 wrote:
To my knowledge the 25 WE model has the 18mm shaft. You can buy this from RM Cycle less than what the shops are asking for...

To my knowledge the 25 WE model has the 18mm shaft. You can buy this from RM Cycle less than what the shops are asking for it. This is the complete shaft, piston, clevis all ready to bolt in. I would clarify it to make sure it would go into your shock body, but both are 50mm so it should work.

52421-K95-AJ1

ROD, PISTON

$485.27

$402.77 their price
 

That's about the same price I have been quoted. Approximately $500 to do 18mm shock shaft upgrade. It's on my wishlist.

 

1
lowmass
Posts
191
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY, USA
1/15/2025 10:16am

question is, is the high speed comp stack same on R and WE?. If the R has a different high speed stack than the WE then simply swaping over to a bigger shaft may be a problem?

I too was on 2007-2008 CRFs before the sxf

AND btw "break in" on the 2025 CRF made zero difference to the harshness I am feeling

AND for those who have SXFs. AER is by far the worst offender for "break in" I have ever delt with. There is a stickyness in that design that I am sure MANY suspensions shops have made a ton simply because people didnt give that fork time to brake in AND for good reason, it takes forever!

I spent the first half of a summer simply chassing "what the hell " with that fork because I assumed the sticky feel would be the main pistion in the air cartridge. It turns out it isnt the issue, its the seal head. There are so called "glide kits" to help but never tryed them. I had two catrages to compare. One with less than 10hr and another with about 100 hrs. The feel both on track and working the plunger by hand was night and day difference between the two. 

Also tryed a ton of different high pressure lubes to help BUT slip stick action remains. Even did some exotic stuff with teflon addatives and even graphite addatives. In the end it was the ultra expensive lube KTM selld=s for it that no one uses that worked best

There is a fundamental issue with AER imo. Its an elegant and simple design  and I loved the feel of a lighte weight fork in dynamic moves like scubs and whips and sudden line changes and I like being able to alter spring rate at will track to track BUT in the end the coil conversions won out

1
soggy
Posts
8851
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
1/15/2025 10:23am

interestingly Gasjer has switched from Showa components to KYB for this year.  Obviously you can't directly compare race bikes to what consumers experience but Tim wasn't getting the feel he wanted from the Showa stuff.  Will be interesting if the Lawrences eventually make a similar switch.

2
1
lowmass
Posts
191
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY, USA
1/15/2025 10:23am Edited Date/Time 1/15/2025 10:27am
prida28 wrote:
This has to be one of the better threads on Vital in awhile. A lot of great commentary, thoughts and opinions.I just picked up a 2025...

This has to be one of the better threads on Vital in awhile. A lot of great commentary, thoughts and opinions.

I just picked up a 2025 CRF450 last week and took it out both Saturday and Sunday here in SoCal at Pala (yes, I still call it Pala and not Fox). Everything in this thread is very relatable to what I felt even on the first couple of rides. Coming off a 2024 SXF FE (and 10 years of riding steel frame bikes) I was just looking for a different feel. My last Honda was a 2008 CRF450 so maybe just dreaming of the glory days.

I only have a couple hours on the bike so I am still breaking it it. At 200 lb Vet B rider, I know the springs are soft. My plan is to get the suspension valved and sprung in the next few weeks by RideJBI.

As far as my experience so far, I basically rolled it off the showroom floor and rode the first hour after setting the clickers to some baseline based on Keefer's recommendation. I knew the forks were going to be soft so I left the sag at 118 which is what it was from the show room for me. Even with that much sag, the soft forks did dive really bad off-throttle. The on-throttle feel of the rear end though low, was very stable. The oddest feeling I was feeling from the bike was this very weird kick from the rear off-throttle. I am attributing that do the really soft forks and the lack of hold up.

For day 2 I decided to add 40cc's of oil in each fork leg and added 3 turns of preload to the shock. That got me in the 108-109 range. Both of those really did help balance the bike and prevent the diving/pitching. I was playing around with the fork rebound and seem to battling between too fast as I speed them up to a little harsh as I slowed them down. By the end of the day, I ended up adding another turn of preload (now in the 105-106 range). All that help balance the bike, but I never was able to get rid of the off-throttle kick in the rear end. Not sure if I relate that to harshness of the chassis or suspension setup.

Anyways, again I only have couple hours on the bike so a lot to learn and experiment with. 

Please keep the dialog going. I am interested to hear everyone's thought on the 18mm shock shaft as well as how some of the different suspension shops are improving this machine.

Thanks again!

yea for sure you need some coils

BUT in the mean time try simply running the fork rebound clicker to only 2-3 out from full hard. the crossover effect gives a solid increase in compression damp and that combined with the 40cc ya put in makes that stock fork ridable. the actual comp clicker at top of fork didnt give what was needed and seemed to make things worse with extreem setting.

ALSO I found the stock shock spring on the 25 honda to need attention constantly in the first 3-4 hrs. It seems to take a set? strange as I kept having to reset preload to get back to where it started after a long ride. After a few hrs it was fine but strange. Ive never seen a coil do that before in my life.

I have heard others say somthing similar happened to them. Not at all sure what is going on there.

1
1
Luxon MX
Posts
1391
Joined
11/6/2017
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Fantasy
1/15/2025 10:29am

The simple fact the shaft is 18 mm vs 16 won't change the harshness. It's the revised valving in the shock that makes a difference (if any). The only real reason to go to a larger shaft is to reduce the chance of buckling, which for the normal rider is irrelevant. If you're on supercross suspension casing the big triple at A1, it becomes a different story, but for most people it's just a marketing tactic. 

5
1
soggy
Posts
8851
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
1/15/2025 10:58am
Luxon MX wrote:
The simple fact the shaft is 18 mm vs 16 won't change the harshness. It's the revised valving in the shock that makes a difference (if...

The simple fact the shaft is 18 mm vs 16 won't change the harshness. It's the revised valving in the shock that makes a difference (if any). The only real reason to go to a larger shaft is to reduce the chance of buckling, which for the normal rider is irrelevant. If you're on supercross suspension casing the big triple at A1, it becomes a different story, but for most people it's just a marketing tactic. 

god damn we need a keefer x luxon video sooo badly.

1
2
lowmass
Posts
191
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY, USA
1/15/2025 11:20am

I love how efficient truth is  Wink  

1
Sandusky26
Posts
3495
Joined
7/28/2021
Location
Eastern, NC, USA
1/15/2025 11:42am
Luxon MX wrote:
The simple fact the shaft is 18 mm vs 16 won't change the harshness. It's the revised valving in the shock that makes a difference (if...

The simple fact the shaft is 18 mm vs 16 won't change the harshness. It's the revised valving in the shock that makes a difference (if any). The only real reason to go to a larger shaft is to reduce the chance of buckling, which for the normal rider is irrelevant. If you're on supercross suspension casing the big triple at A1, it becomes a different story, but for most people it's just a marketing tactic. 

soggy wrote:
god damn we need a keefer x luxon video sooo badly.

god damn we need a keefer x luxon video sooo badly.

Fight club

1
AssangeMX
Posts
498
Joined
3/12/2024
Location
Belmarsh, CA, USA
1/15/2025 11:46am
soggy wrote:
interestingly Gasjer has switched from Showa components to KYB for this year.  Obviously you can't directly compare race bikes to what consumers experience but Tim wasn't...

interestingly Gasjer has switched from Showa components to KYB for this year.  Obviously you can't directly compare race bikes to what consumers experience but Tim wasn't getting the feel he wanted from the Showa stuff.  Will be interesting if the Lawrences eventually make a similar switch.

Meanwhile, 3 factory ktm group riders are running the productio  airfork in supercross, they obviously didn't learn from vital that fork is unrideable 😉

1
3
Austin_Rankin
Posts
1119
Joined
9/3/2019
Location
Georgetown, KY, USA
1/15/2025 12:07pm
AssangeMX wrote:

Meanwhile, 3 factory ktm group riders are running the productio  airfork in supercross, they obviously didn't learn from vital that fork is unrideable 😉

They do it in sx cause it’s lighter, in outdoors the front end deserves to pack a little more mass.


Vital doesn’t have thought processes like this. 

1
3
captmoto
Posts
5892
Joined
4/22/2009
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
1/15/2025 12:47pm
lowmass wrote:
Im not sure this question was directed at me, but heres my take on the compare between the 25 sxf350 and the 25 crf450 Ive been on...

Im not sure this question was directed at me, but heres my take on the compare between the 25 sxf350 and the 25 crf450

 Ive been on ktms for the last 5 years and they are superior to any jap bike in these areas...

Breaks, the brembos really are usefully better. They are more linear and consistent. I didnt realize how much my corner entrance was influenced by the brembos. The jap brakes dont give that confidence. Not talking power here but finesss. That said the Hondas new front brake is better than the yamaha 

Clutch, face it, the ktm clutch a heads and tail above the rest and yamaha is now nearly a direct copy. I have never gotten anywhere near as much life out of a clutch as the ktm design. Looking at it as a development  engineer its a work of art

Components, the ktms are superior. better metalurgy, better design and they last. drop your honda and the weak cast levers will snap

Reliability, the ktm 4 strokes gave me 250 hrs on motors without an issue. I dont rev loud however. BUT I never came close to that life in any jap bike except the yamahas

Neutral handling. The ktms are bullseye at the center of nutrality. They turn well (not as sharp as the honda) but they have a forgiving nutral response to your inputs.

The new ktms did overcome the squat issue the older ones had in the rear BUT the height at the rear of the seat is off imo. it needs to be about 5mm lower. Many dont seem to have a problem with this BUT I see the ktm team is quietly dealing with this one.

THE 350SXF

I hate the air fork. Its a marvel of  simple design thats biggest advantage imo is the ability to change the spring rate easily. Sand track? 2-3 more psi and a click or two and the bike is level again. However I grew tired of constantly chasing that pressure as it would change throughout the day with temp and I can easily feel 2 psi change. I eventually went with spring conversion and valving change (RT) and was happy and could get similar results on sand by simply changing comp clicker now. HOWEVER to my suprise I could feel that coils weight big time compared to the air cartradge. I suspect most wont have an issue with this but I do a lot of faster scrub whip type moves and trying to flick those bars around with 3 lbs added to the mix made a heavy feel. I got used to it BUT still miss it

The new motor definatly has better low to mid torque feel that the older 350. However that feel is really only good on dryer or harder surfaces. Once ya get into thicker power robbing stuff your right back to a big 250 feel. Ya gotta rev hard to keep it from falling on its face . Deal breaker for me as I like to ride in center of a wider 450 style power bubble

FI, the fuel injection on the 350 was a joke. It was herky jerky down low. sure stay away from that low a speed and its fine but at this stage there is no excuse for  FI to be that unrefined. Strangely enough there were some days it didnt do this. I dont know why

Lack of "feel" of front end at corner entrance. Same as my 2022sxf450. this chassis doesnt have the feedback that the honda does. I dont like the vague feel out front and btw its similar on the yamaha

The Honda 450

Kind of cheezy and lower quality build than the ktm BUT not bad. Just not up to ktm quality and the plastics will eat holes in the frame. If ya buy pull plastics and put thick tape over those spots

Sharper handling. I love the way this bike almost feels like a pair of skis under me. I can angulate and carve and feel whats going on under me as I work the bike from my core. GOOD STUFF

Suspension, OK for novice but trouble if your at all fast or over 140 lbs. Forks have almost no comp damp and blow through stroke easily. Rear seems ok  BUT front is the most plush I have ever felt so long as ya dont crush it

Chassis, theres a harshness in the rear of this bike. Some say its in the chassis. Some ay there is a usefull washing of this IF ya spend the money and suspension work. I have been round and round with contacts on this and so far it is looking like Factory Connection might be the best place to send the suspension too. However your looking at 1500 -1800 to find out. I will likley be sending mine out but wont have a report till spring as we are frozen solid here in NY now ha

Motor, this is a very good motor for the average guy. Its not a power house but has a well managed power profile that will work well for most. Its not the rush of the yamaha but thats a good thing for most

The stock seat is the all time fail of mx seats. its thin, too soft, and the frame rails are felt easily. Inexcusable design BUT having the intake air going up over the hock makes for so little room they were forced here. They should work on this

The new honda is defiantly less head shake than the older ones. They seemed to have fixed this a usefull amount.

FUN, I just have more fun on this bike than the 350. It feels lighter, has much better low end to mid usefulness, and it slices and dices corners. If the harshness in the rear can be fixed enough then I choose the lower quality honda over the higher quality KTM. The Honda isnt bad its just not up to the KTMs standard of quality, BUT she is way more fun imo

 

All that said the new 350 sxf is a great bike for many so long as ya arent asking it to torque through the thick stuff. If ya live out east and you are mid pack amature or faster I would not choose this bike

 

Sounds like pretty simple answer - you don't gel with an aluminum frame. I tried every jap bike and never been comfortable on an aluminum frame...

Sounds like pretty simple answer - you don't gel with an aluminum frame. I tried every jap bike and never been comfortable on an aluminum frame. KTM 350 now and once sorted the suspension and engine - did the factory programmer dialed up the torque settings as well as engine braking wow big difference. AER 48 forks with glide kit work beautiful now.

lowmass wrote:
I dont believe its as simple as "dont like AL frame". My 2022 sxf has the same harshness in the rear as the 2025 crf450. As...

I dont believe its as simple as "dont like AL frame". My 2022 sxf has the same harshness in the rear as the 2025 crf450. As well Ive done decades of design and development work with these materials and its all in the exacution, not so much the material. Steel does afford more lattitude in what ya can do because of its resiliance( resistance to cracks) BUT you still have to overcome issue in overall design to tame unwanted resonances and oscillations.

If Honda gets this chasis figured out and cleans up a few areas this bike will be loved by most. The KTM are for sure better built but...... 

Ride JBI has a video explaining how the chain torque binds up the stroke on the KTM group and stays bound up until full compression. He claims he has setting to compensate for that.

1
3strokemx
Posts
2853
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
1/15/2025 1:06pm
prida28 wrote:
This has to be one of the better threads on Vital in awhile. A lot of great commentary, thoughts and opinions.I just picked up a 2025...

This has to be one of the better threads on Vital in awhile. A lot of great commentary, thoughts and opinions.

I just picked up a 2025 CRF450 last week and took it out both Saturday and Sunday here in SoCal at Pala (yes, I still call it Pala and not Fox). Everything in this thread is very relatable to what I felt even on the first couple of rides. Coming off a 2024 SXF FE (and 10 years of riding steel frame bikes) I was just looking for a different feel. My last Honda was a 2008 CRF450 so maybe just dreaming of the glory days.

I only have a couple hours on the bike so I am still breaking it it. At 200 lb Vet B rider, I know the springs are soft. My plan is to get the suspension valved and sprung in the next few weeks by RideJBI.

As far as my experience so far, I basically rolled it off the showroom floor and rode the first hour after setting the clickers to some baseline based on Keefer's recommendation. I knew the forks were going to be soft so I left the sag at 118 which is what it was from the show room for me. Even with that much sag, the soft forks did dive really bad off-throttle. The on-throttle feel of the rear end though low, was very stable. The oddest feeling I was feeling from the bike was this very weird kick from the rear off-throttle. I am attributing that do the really soft forks and the lack of hold up.

For day 2 I decided to add 40cc's of oil in each fork leg and added 3 turns of preload to the shock. That got me in the 108-109 range. Both of those really did help balance the bike and prevent the diving/pitching. I was playing around with the fork rebound and seem to battling between too fast as I speed them up to a little harsh as I slowed them down. By the end of the day, I ended up adding another turn of preload (now in the 105-106 range). All that help balance the bike, but I never was able to get rid of the off-throttle kick in the rear end. Not sure if I relate that to harshness of the chassis or suspension setup.

Anyways, again I only have couple hours on the bike so a lot to learn and experiment with. 

Please keep the dialog going. I am interested to hear everyone's thought on the 18mm shock shaft as well as how some of the different suspension shops are improving this machine.

Thanks again!

Have you tried slowing the rebound? That could be the cause of your kick.

soggy
Posts
8851
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
1/15/2025 1:11pm
soggy wrote:
interestingly Gasjer has switched from Showa components to KYB for this year.  Obviously you can't directly compare race bikes to what consumers experience but Tim wasn't...

interestingly Gasjer has switched from Showa components to KYB for this year.  Obviously you can't directly compare race bikes to what consumers experience but Tim wasn't getting the feel he wanted from the Showa stuff.  Will be interesting if the Lawrences eventually make a similar switch.

AssangeMX wrote:

Meanwhile, 3 factory ktm group riders are running the productio  airfork in supercross, they obviously didn't learn from vital that fork is unrideable 😉

And another is running kyb inserts

1
prida28
Posts
91
Joined
2/22/2016
Location
Escondido, CA, USA
1/15/2025 1:16pm
prida28 wrote:
This has to be one of the better threads on Vital in awhile. A lot of great commentary, thoughts and opinions.I just picked up a 2025...

This has to be one of the better threads on Vital in awhile. A lot of great commentary, thoughts and opinions.

I just picked up a 2025 CRF450 last week and took it out both Saturday and Sunday here in SoCal at Pala (yes, I still call it Pala and not Fox). Everything in this thread is very relatable to what I felt even on the first couple of rides. Coming off a 2024 SXF FE (and 10 years of riding steel frame bikes) I was just looking for a different feel. My last Honda was a 2008 CRF450 so maybe just dreaming of the glory days.

I only have a couple hours on the bike so I am still breaking it it. At 200 lb Vet B rider, I know the springs are soft. My plan is to get the suspension valved and sprung in the next few weeks by RideJBI.

As far as my experience so far, I basically rolled it off the showroom floor and rode the first hour after setting the clickers to some baseline based on Keefer's recommendation. I knew the forks were going to be soft so I left the sag at 118 which is what it was from the show room for me. Even with that much sag, the soft forks did dive really bad off-throttle. The on-throttle feel of the rear end though low, was very stable. The oddest feeling I was feeling from the bike was this very weird kick from the rear off-throttle. I am attributing that do the really soft forks and the lack of hold up.

For day 2 I decided to add 40cc's of oil in each fork leg and added 3 turns of preload to the shock. That got me in the 108-109 range. Both of those really did help balance the bike and prevent the diving/pitching. I was playing around with the fork rebound and seem to battling between too fast as I speed them up to a little harsh as I slowed them down. By the end of the day, I ended up adding another turn of preload (now in the 105-106 range). All that help balance the bike, but I never was able to get rid of the off-throttle kick in the rear end. Not sure if I relate that to harshness of the chassis or suspension setup.

Anyways, again I only have couple hours on the bike so a lot to learn and experiment with. 

Please keep the dialog going. I am interested to hear everyone's thought on the 18mm shock shaft as well as how some of the different suspension shops are improving this machine.

Thanks again!

3strokemx wrote:

Have you tried slowing the rebound? That could be the cause of your kick.

Thanks 3strokemx.

Yes, I have gone in quite a bit (4-5 clicks) without much of a difference in the kick. Mostly just make the ride harsh on acceleration bumps. This kick is more like just a weight transfer or something when the rear isn't weighted (off acceleration). I am still playing with SAG and Rebound to see if I can reduce this sensation.

 

crc245
Posts
1344
Joined
10/29/2007
Location
Yorba Linda, CA, USA
1/15/2025 1:40pm
prida28 wrote:
Thanks 3strokemx.Yes, I have gone in quite a bit (4-5 clicks) without much of a difference in the kick. Mostly just make the ride harsh on...

Thanks 3strokemx.

Yes, I have gone in quite a bit (4-5 clicks) without much of a difference in the kick. Mostly just make the ride harsh on acceleration bumps. This kick is more like just a weight transfer or something when the rear isn't weighted (off acceleration). I am still playing with SAG and Rebound to see if I can reduce this sensation.

 

Left field, I know, but have you tried running any HSTC (green light) settings yet? I swear the backend is more settled with it when utilized, not just on acceleration. Also, this chassis/engine combo LOVE being ridden a gear high; helps quite a bit on that harshness many experience. Same track, went from 2nd/3rd gear on a 25’ KX450 to 3rd/4th on the 25’ CRF - That drastic.

 

My last 25’ 450RWE specs:

Map1, HSTC1 (Option: Map3, HSTC1/2 for pace days). Fork height flush to 2.5mm, C10/R11, Shock: 103-105mm sag, HS1.25/LS8/R8

spacecat
Posts
97
Joined
5/22/2011
Location
Spencer, OH, USA
1/15/2025 2:44pm
spacecat wrote:
I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag...

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

lowmass wrote:

how bout it spacecat.  whats the report on the FC mods?  

Unfortunately I live in Ohio and the weather is trash right now. I'll report back as soon as I can. It's all set up and ready to go

1

Post a reply to: Honda CRF Chassis harshness

The Latest