AC Salary Reveal

APLMAN99
Posts
12270
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR US
Fantasy
10/17/2024 7:27pm
Timo wrote:
Sounded like he couldn't disclose the breakdown of the 1.8, he was texting with his manager about what all he could say and not get sued...

Sounded like he couldn't disclose the breakdown of the 1.8, he was texting with his manager about what all he could say and not get sued, which is the weirdest part to me. 

LungButter wrote:

Probably have Confidentiality Clauses in a lot of the contracts.  

All entertainers hv that in there contracts.  I had a few pals that drove them in rock star buses.  The marketing behind entertainers is ridiculous.  None...

All entertainers hv that in there contracts.  I had a few pals that drove them in rock star buses.  The marketing behind entertainers is ridiculous.  None of them r who you think they r.  .50 cent for example quite as a church mouse on the bus that that you swear you don’t hv a passenger. And Very Respectful when he does come up and talk to the driver.  Most athletes r The Biggest Dick heads you could ever imagine. A pal of mine drove a nfl player to the airport. And said hv a good  flight just being pleasant, none of them r star struck it’s just a job driving someone.  The nfl player says f u .  My pal said ever speak like that again towards me & you,ll hv your head beaten in.  All the bus drivers where truckers a million times tougher than any nfl player. 

IMG 6271 0.jpeg?VersionId=
1
6
Herr Lich
Posts
2568
Joined
7/11/2023
Location
Sydney, NSW AU
10/17/2024 8:27pm
I love AC and usually agree with what he has to say, but I'm with you and don't agree at all with his rant about broadcast...

I love AC and usually agree with what he has to say, but I'm with you and don't agree at all with his rant about broadcast critics. He has a point about people wanting to find something to bitch about, BUT there is also legitimate criticism of the broadcast.

RC has gotten better, most have acknowledged that, but he's still nowhere near the level of Stewart, Brayton, or even AC when he's dabbled in it. So people CAN acknowledge progress.

It's like whenever someone gets let behind the curtain and becomes part of the "crew" they now can't acknowledge any issues.

It's odd to me how Steve always brings up how Weege and JT are bought and paid for, yet he won't criticize Bondo or the glaring issues either.

As for AC's salary, yes that's A LOT of money, but that's still such a low number compared to some other professional sports. I know the crazy money isn't there like it is with stick and ball sports, but man I wish those top level elite guys could pull more than they do. 

They'd probably retire by 25. Basketball, baseball and even football don't have near the injury risk of motocross. 

ando wrote:
Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very...

Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  

Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very highly correlated with popularity and broadcast audience exposure, that's it.  This mantra that MX riders deserve higher pay is worn out and just not based on any realistic merit.  

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

8
1
Mavetism
Posts
5848
Joined
4/15/2019
Location
Hannover DE
10/18/2024 1:31am

They'd probably retire by 25. Basketball, baseball and even football don't have near the injury risk of motocross. 

ando wrote:
Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very...

Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  

Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very highly correlated with popularity and broadcast audience exposure, that's it.  This mantra that MX riders deserve higher pay is worn out and just not based on any realistic merit.  

Herr Lich wrote:
Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship...

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

Yeah. For example one topic that comes up again and again specially here in europe is people (women) demanding higher or even equal pay for women's soccer. How exactly should that work out? Nobody is watching it, the stadiums are completely empty, why should they make the same money as men?

Injuries aside, I always thought that being a MX pro athlete gotta be the coolest shit ever. Not only can you make a living out of the best sport in the world (and some of these guys never have to work again when they retire), you can also live a normal life and not get overwhelmed or overrun by fans when you go out.

12
Mavetism
Posts
5848
Joined
4/15/2019
Location
Hannover DE
10/18/2024 1:59am
FYI, I saw a post about the UFC 307 payout and all the comments were "they should get paid more", including Pereira and Roundtree, who brought...

FYI, I saw a post about the UFC 307 payout and all the comments were "they should get paid more", including Pereira and Roundtree, who brought home 2.7m and 1.4m respectively.

Seems the collective is tired of the clowns getting the short end, yet they keep watching, liking, and subscribing to the circus.

Flatliner wrote:
Nobody is forcing them to be ufc fighters, and they'll get ppv money on the back end too, Pereira for sure as a champ.If they view...

Nobody is forcing them to be ufc fighters, and they'll get ppv money on the back end too, Pereira for sure as a champ.

If they view that salary as too low, go to the PFL,  go to Bellator.

 

The comments were made by morans, not the fighters.

And that is with PPV. 

A lot of fighters also complained about that. But this isn't about top ranked fighters at all.

The main issue in the UFC is with unranked/new fighters, they basically start their first contracts getting around 10-12k per fight. Double that if they win. They fight 2-3 times per year, this is in case they don't get injured of course, because they only get paid if they show up. The money for the next contract depends on how you perform in your first fights and how you sell yourself. Some of them retire broke, while other fighters can become multi millionaires.

Definitely a rough sport, but as Flatliner said, nobody is forcing them to be professional UFC fighters. For some of them it's the absolute dream to make a living out of fighting. One of the biggest issues though is that fighters aren't allowed to represent sponsors inside the octagon. Makes sense when they make less money so they're more likely to accept fights on 2 weeks notice lmao.

The Shop

10/18/2024 3:00am
Flatliner wrote:
Nobody is forcing them to be ufc fighters, and they'll get ppv money on the back end too, Pereira for sure as a champ.If they view...

Nobody is forcing them to be ufc fighters, and they'll get ppv money on the back end too, Pereira for sure as a champ.

If they view that salary as too low, go to the PFL,  go to Bellator.

 

The comments were made by morans, not the fighters.

And that is with PPV. 

Mavetism wrote:
A lot of fighters also complained about that. But this isn't about top ranked fighters at all.The main issue in the UFC is with unranked/new fighters...

A lot of fighters also complained about that. But this isn't about top ranked fighters at all.

The main issue in the UFC is with unranked/new fighters, they basically start their first contracts getting around 10-12k per fight. Double that if they win. They fight 2-3 times per year, this is in case they don't get injured of course, because they only get paid if they show up. The money for the next contract depends on how you perform in your first fights and how you sell yourself. Some of them retire broke, while other fighters can become multi millionaires.

Definitely a rough sport, but as Flatliner said, nobody is forcing them to be professional UFC fighters. For some of them it's the absolute dream to make a living out of fighting. One of the biggest issues though is that fighters aren't allowed to represent sponsors inside the octagon. Makes sense when they make less money so they're more likely to accept fights on 2 weeks notice lmao.

My initial comment wasn’t about the economics of fighter pay. It was to point out that fans of other sports also feel the same/have the same complaints, despite the size of the numbers being different. 

It’s a common theme since pay isn’t based on risk, and they aren’t the ring leader.

You are correct in your UFC assessment. No shortage of bodies lining up to be sent into the grinder so no reason for Dana or Davey or K. Feld to pay more. 

I’m surrounded by guys/girls doing it for free or $150 or $500. 

Same same moto. 

I am also surrounded by martial artists who do it for the love.

Same same moto. 

1
APLMAN99
Posts
12270
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR US
Fantasy
10/18/2024 10:49am
ando wrote:
Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very...

Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  

Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very highly correlated with popularity and broadcast audience exposure, that's it.  This mantra that MX riders deserve higher pay is worn out and just not based on any realistic merit.  

Herr Lich wrote:
Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship...

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

Mavetism wrote:
Yeah. For example one topic that comes up again and again specially here in europe is people (women) demanding higher or even equal pay for women's...

Yeah. For example one topic that comes up again and again specially here in europe is people (women) demanding higher or even equal pay for women's soccer. How exactly should that work out? Nobody is watching it, the stadiums are completely empty, why should they make the same money as men?

Injuries aside, I always thought that being a MX pro athlete gotta be the coolest shit ever. Not only can you make a living out of the best sport in the world (and some of these guys never have to work again when they retire), you can also live a normal life and not get overwhelmed or overrun by fans when you go out.

I'm not sure what other countries have issues with the difference in pay for their national soccer teams, but the issue in the US wasn't quite so simple.  Traditionally the men's national team had brought in the majority of the revenue, but after 2015 that reversed for most years.  That led the women to ask for pay commensurate with their share of the revenue, or at least an even amount as the men.  But there were/are a lot of variables involved and each year one of those teams might have a great revenue year and the other not, and vice versa.  And the issue was really only about the pay that the athletes earned from the national teams, not any of the professional contracts that they had with private teams, etc.  

The European debates may be completely different, and even in the US I think it would have been wise to look at a longer time period and average out the revenues before asking for a complete overhaul, but it is what it is.........

2
3
Jeremy200
Posts
250
Joined
8/11/2011
Location
NZ
10/18/2024 11:28am

Correct me if I’m wrong.

1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a more accurate salary

3
2
10/18/2024 11:37am
Spoonguy wrote:

I heard that. I sure didn't agree with his take on fan's opinions of the broadcast team.

I love AC and usually agree with what he has to say, but I'm with you and don't agree at all with his rant about broadcast...

I love AC and usually agree with what he has to say, but I'm with you and don't agree at all with his rant about broadcast critics. He has a point about people wanting to find something to bitch about, BUT there is also legitimate criticism of the broadcast.

RC has gotten better, most have acknowledged that, but he's still nowhere near the level of Stewart, Brayton, or even AC when he's dabbled in it. So people CAN acknowledge progress.

It's like whenever someone gets let behind the curtain and becomes part of the "crew" they now can't acknowledge any issues.

It's odd to me how Steve always brings up how Weege and JT are bought and paid for, yet he won't criticize Bondo or the glaring issues either.

As for AC's salary, yes that's A LOT of money, but that's still such a low number compared to some other professional sports. I know the crazy money isn't there like it is with stick and ball sports, but man I wish those top level elite guys could pull more than they do. 

It’s ridiculous to compare sports & money.  Riders always say we risk our lives. They need to stop doing this thousands do not loose there lives...

It’s ridiculous to compare sports & money.  Riders always say we risk our lives. They need to stop doing this thousands do not loose there lives each yr, like  truckers . I  know of drivers that throw a piano on there shoulder & walk in the house.  Ovr 100 nfl players couldn’t make it 6 months at Sysco food delivery in Milwaukee.  As an IC we work where the money is the best. Not much different than a IC racer.  I Love it that Adam did Great money wise .  Figure out how many hrs at a race & his contract, Dam impressive #,s.  I just think some money needs to b thrown into the pro am races and add another pro class or 2.  125 & stock engine 250f.   I dated baseball & nfl players  wives & x,s they always freaked oh wow your body . Your in better shape than my x millionaire athlete 

Holy fuck

This post should be pinned and remembered in the vital HOF

9
2
Motofinne
Posts
11403
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
10/18/2024 11:44am Edited Date/Time 10/18/2024 11:46am

They'd probably retire by 25. Basketball, baseball and even football don't have near the injury risk of motocross. 

ando wrote:
Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very...

Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  

Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very highly correlated with popularity and broadcast audience exposure, that's it.  This mantra that MX riders deserve higher pay is worn out and just not based on any realistic merit.  

Herr Lich wrote:
Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship...

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

Which is why i might have a very unpopular opinion but here it comes. The top riders in this sport earn an insane amount of money when we look at the size of the sport from a completely objective perspective. Disregard risk, and how gnarly it is because that has nothing to do with how much people are getting paid when it comes to sports. 

The money is freaking good. 

 

5
enketchum
Posts
4397
Joined
2/6/2012
Location
Pasadena, CA US
10/18/2024 11:48am

nice job, everyone 

3
3
10/18/2024 12:02pm
ando wrote:
Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very...

Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  

Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very highly correlated with popularity and broadcast audience exposure, that's it.  This mantra that MX riders deserve higher pay is worn out and just not based on any realistic merit.  

Herr Lich wrote:
Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship...

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

Mavetism wrote:
Yeah. For example one topic that comes up again and again specially here in europe is people (women) demanding higher or even equal pay for women's...

Yeah. For example one topic that comes up again and again specially here in europe is people (women) demanding higher or even equal pay for women's soccer. How exactly should that work out? Nobody is watching it, the stadiums are completely empty, why should they make the same money as men?

Injuries aside, I always thought that being a MX pro athlete gotta be the coolest shit ever. Not only can you make a living out of the best sport in the world (and some of these guys never have to work again when they retire), you can also live a normal life and not get overwhelmed or overrun by fans when you go out.

I was thinking about this the other day. I hope these factory guys know how good they have it. Especially compared to us peasants that work for wages. Especially some of us have spent years in school and may have student loans. Then working from 8:00 to 5:00 everyday doing something that isn't too exciting working with s***** coworkers and/or boss. Stressed all the time 😂

Then they make great money and get to enjoy their lives as a normal human being. Yes to us, they are celebrities. But to the world they are just another person on the street. Probably 1 in every 3 people who LeBron, Mahomes, Tswift, Bieber, Messi, Ronaldo etc is. Then maybe 1 in every 300 knows who Tomac, Jett, or Deegan is. 

 

3
10/18/2024 12:04pm

They'd probably retire by 25. Basketball, baseball and even football don't have near the injury risk of motocross. 

ando wrote:
Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very...

Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  

Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very highly correlated with popularity and broadcast audience exposure, that's it.  This mantra that MX riders deserve higher pay is worn out and just not based on any realistic merit.  

Herr Lich wrote:
Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship...

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

I agree with this. It's just facts. Of course us fans believe they deserve more. 

zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX US
10/18/2024 12:37pm
Jeremy200 wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong.1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a...

Correct me if I’m wrong.

1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a more accurate salary

Not sure why you’re getting down voted, this seems pretty accurate to me


Travel and practice track expenses don’t seem likely but everything else does

3
JazzyJJ
Posts
1791
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
Nunya, WY US
10/18/2024 1:11pm
Herr Lich wrote:
Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship...

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

Mavetism wrote:
Yeah. For example one topic that comes up again and again specially here in europe is people (women) demanding higher or even equal pay for women's...

Yeah. For example one topic that comes up again and again specially here in europe is people (women) demanding higher or even equal pay for women's soccer. How exactly should that work out? Nobody is watching it, the stadiums are completely empty, why should they make the same money as men?

Injuries aside, I always thought that being a MX pro athlete gotta be the coolest shit ever. Not only can you make a living out of the best sport in the world (and some of these guys never have to work again when they retire), you can also live a normal life and not get overwhelmed or overrun by fans when you go out.

I was thinking about this the other day. I hope these factory guys know how good they have it. Especially compared to us peasants that work...

I was thinking about this the other day. I hope these factory guys know how good they have it. Especially compared to us peasants that work for wages. Especially some of us have spent years in school and may have student loans. Then working from 8:00 to 5:00 everyday doing something that isn't too exciting working with s***** coworkers and/or boss. Stressed all the time 😂

Then they make great money and get to enjoy their lives as a normal human being. Yes to us, they are celebrities. But to the world they are just another person on the street. Probably 1 in every 3 people who LeBron, Mahomes, Tswift, Bieber, Messi, Ronaldo etc is. Then maybe 1 in every 300 knows who Tomac, Jett, or Deegan is. 

 

I'd be surprised if more than 50k people could pick Tomac out on the street, maybe deegs/Jett are double that, still not many. 

10/18/2024 1:16pm
ando wrote:
Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very...

Motocross has a higher risk of severe injury but probably a lower incidence of minor injuries.  

Athlete income has nothing to do with risk; it's very highly correlated with popularity and broadcast audience exposure, that's it.  This mantra that MX riders deserve higher pay is worn out and just not based on any realistic merit.  

Herr Lich wrote:
Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship...

Agreed.  Athlete income is a direct function of demand in a free market economy.  The popularity of the sport, which is monetised through broadcast deals, sponsorship deals, and attendance figures, determines how much money is generated. It's nothing to do with 'deserving' something just because its more risky.  

I agree with this. It's just facts. Of course us fans believe they deserve more. 

No I don't, I believe the others down the starting line deserve more of the pie. Without them the show would be weak.

1
2
10/18/2024 6:24pm
I love AC and usually agree with what he has to say, but I'm with you and don't agree at all with his rant about broadcast...

I love AC and usually agree with what he has to say, but I'm with you and don't agree at all with his rant about broadcast critics. He has a point about people wanting to find something to bitch about, BUT there is also legitimate criticism of the broadcast.

RC has gotten better, most have acknowledged that, but he's still nowhere near the level of Stewart, Brayton, or even AC when he's dabbled in it. So people CAN acknowledge progress.

It's like whenever someone gets let behind the curtain and becomes part of the "crew" they now can't acknowledge any issues.

It's odd to me how Steve always brings up how Weege and JT are bought and paid for, yet he won't criticize Bondo or the glaring issues either.

As for AC's salary, yes that's A LOT of money, but that's still such a low number compared to some other professional sports. I know the crazy money isn't there like it is with stick and ball sports, but man I wish those top level elite guys could pull more than they do. 

It’s ridiculous to compare sports & money.  Riders always say we risk our lives. They need to stop doing this thousands do not loose there lives...

It’s ridiculous to compare sports & money.  Riders always say we risk our lives. They need to stop doing this thousands do not loose there lives each yr, like  truckers . I  know of drivers that throw a piano on there shoulder & walk in the house.  Ovr 100 nfl players couldn’t make it 6 months at Sysco food delivery in Milwaukee.  As an IC we work where the money is the best. Not much different than a IC racer.  I Love it that Adam did Great money wise .  Figure out how many hrs at a race & his contract, Dam impressive #,s.  I just think some money needs to b thrown into the pro am races and add another pro class or 2.  125 & stock engine 250f.   I dated baseball & nfl players  wives & x,s they always freaked oh wow your body . Your in better shape than my x millionaire athlete 

Holy fuck

This post should be pinned and remembered in the vital HOF

Without your comment, I never would have read his. Thank you. 

4
Timo
Posts
1408
Joined
1/9/2021
Location
Wichita, KS US
10/19/2024 3:58am
JazzyJJ wrote:

I'd be surprised if more than 50k people could pick Tomac out on the street, maybe deegs/Jett are double that, still not many. 

There's close to a million people watching each race and he's got over a million followers on Instagram so I'd bet it's more than 50k.

2
davis224
Posts
7380
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Cornland, IL US
Fantasy
10/19/2024 6:14am
It’s ridiculous to compare sports & money.  Riders always say we risk our lives. They need to stop doing this thousands do not loose there lives...

It’s ridiculous to compare sports & money.  Riders always say we risk our lives. They need to stop doing this thousands do not loose there lives each yr, like  truckers . I  know of drivers that throw a piano on there shoulder & walk in the house.  Ovr 100 nfl players couldn’t make it 6 months at Sysco food delivery in Milwaukee.  As an IC we work where the money is the best. Not much different than a IC racer.  I Love it that Adam did Great money wise .  Figure out how many hrs at a race & his contract, Dam impressive #,s.  I just think some money needs to b thrown into the pro am races and add another pro class or 2.  125 & stock engine 250f.   I dated baseball & nfl players  wives & x,s they always freaked oh wow your body . Your in better shape than my x millionaire athlete 

Holy fuck

This post should be pinned and remembered in the vital HOF

Without your comment, I never would have read his. Thank you. 

I usually just scan the first and last part to see where he started, and where he ended up.

10
10/19/2024 10:13pm
JazzyJJ wrote:

I'd be surprised if more than 50k people could pick Tomac out on the street, maybe deegs/Jett are double that, still not many. 

Timo wrote:

There's close to a million people watching each race and he's got over a million followers on Instagram so I'd bet it's more than 50k.

I'd say my estimates are correct. In USA atleast 1-3 people know the most famous celebrities. Tomac/Deegan (even Kroc) have over a million followers on Insta. Someone like Bieber is around 300m. So 1 in every 300-400 people in the US know our riders. 

1
10/19/2024 10:42pm
JazzyJJ wrote:

I'd be surprised if more than 50k people could pick Tomac out on the street, maybe deegs/Jett are double that, still not many. 

Timo wrote:

There's close to a million people watching each race and he's got over a million followers on Instagram so I'd bet it's more than 50k.

I'd say my estimates are correct. In USA atleast 1-3 people know the most famous celebrities. Tomac/Deegan (even Kroc) have over a million followers on Insta...

I'd say my estimates are correct. In USA atleast 1-3 people know the most famous celebrities. Tomac/Deegan (even Kroc) have over a million followers on Insta. Someone like Bieber is around 300m. So 1 in every 300-400 people in the US know our riders. 

Self awarded “I am correct” trophy for an estimate.

Vital is on brand lately.

7
1
RalphS
Posts
975
Joined
2/26/2020
Location
North Hollywood, CA US
10/20/2024 1:16pm
I'd say my estimates are correct. In USA atleast 1-3 people know the most famous celebrities. Tomac/Deegan (even Kroc) have over a million followers on Insta...

I'd say my estimates are correct. In USA atleast 1-3 people know the most famous celebrities. Tomac/Deegan (even Kroc) have over a million followers on Insta. Someone like Bieber is around 300m. So 1 in every 300-400 people in the US know our riders. 

Yeah that'd be a nah for me dawg

1
10/20/2024 6:18pm Edited Date/Time 10/20/2024 6:19pm
Jeremy200 wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong.1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a...

Correct me if I’m wrong.

1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a more accurate salary

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.


The $1.8 figure AC quote was his gross income between Kawasaki and Fox. He’s a 1099 and sole proprietor, so yes, he’s paying himself to run a business. He’s still probably putting a few hundred grand in the bank at the end of the year, after all those business expenses, cost of living, etc… still doing really good for a dirt bike rider.

“Salary” figures are gross, not net. This goes for W2 and 1099 tax returns.

2
BS12
Posts
1066
Joined
1/13/2014
Location
AU
10/20/2024 6:29pm
Jeremy200 wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong.1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a...

Correct me if I’m wrong.

1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a more accurate salary

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.The $1.8 figure AC quote was his...

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.


The $1.8 figure AC quote was his gross income between Kawasaki and Fox. He’s a 1099 and sole proprietor, so yes, he’s paying himself to run a business. He’s still probably putting a few hundred grand in the bank at the end of the year, after all those business expenses, cost of living, etc… still doing really good for a dirt bike rider.

“Salary” figures are gross, not net. This goes for W2 and 1099 tax returns.

"70k after taxes"

2
1
Electromoran
Posts
494
Joined
11/6/2023
Location
Edinboro , PA US
10/20/2024 6:53pm
Magoofan wrote:

I woulda figured about tree-fiddy....

Spooner wrote:

There is not a more tired joke than this one. 

Moran!

1
10/20/2024 7:30pm
Jeremy200 wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong.1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a...

Correct me if I’m wrong.

1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a more accurate salary

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.The $1.8 figure AC quote was his...

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.


The $1.8 figure AC quote was his gross income between Kawasaki and Fox. He’s a 1099 and sole proprietor, so yes, he’s paying himself to run a business. He’s still probably putting a few hundred grand in the bank at the end of the year, after all those business expenses, cost of living, etc… still doing really good for a dirt bike rider.

“Salary” figures are gross, not net. This goes for W2 and 1099 tax returns.

1099? I was thinking he was W2. 1099 would be worse since they have to pay the full 15.3% tax rate. W2 pay half that. 

TeamGreen
Posts
36736
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
10/21/2024 2:47pm
Spoonguy wrote:
To paraphrase AC on his rant about broadcast critics, "If I am told to go into a room and point out everything green, I won't see...

To paraphrase AC on his rant about broadcast critics, "If I am told to go into a room and point out everything green, I won't see reds or yellows, only green". What? I thought that was new age psycho-babble bullshit, just like the whole there are very few absolutes, and everything is an opinion. When a person is a professional presenter, or announcer to a potentially international audience, representing a sport that promotes multi-billion-dollar industries and he/she mispronounces, misrepresents, slays basic grade school grammar and sentence structure, repeats over and over cliches and lame comparisons, or can't even state the competitors names correctly at times, that can certainly be defined as bad or not good. Contrary to AC's rant some people are good at some things, others not so much. AC seems like a good guy; he might have a career as a broadcaster, but demonstrating he was home schooled by quoting the latest book he read on Oprah's list and quoting its theories as gospel rather than just an alternative view or one way to look at things is a bad move. Thank God Matthes doesn't have a lot of listeners.

Wow

I…mean…damn. Just…wow. 

Someone like Adam shares his perspective and opinion and this is the spin we get?

Uh, no. Hell…no. 

Sometimes…y’all look and sound like you fucking hate this sport and the people in it. Sometimes, far too many of us seem to think we’ve got an exclusive take on the correct understanding or interpretation of all things Moto…well…again…uh, no…you don’t.

Personally, I like hearing all of the things he’s commenting on from his experiences and I’ve got just one thing to say to him…

Thanks for sharing your experiences with your fellow racing geeks! 

3
3
10/21/2024 3:02pm
Spoonguy wrote:
To paraphrase AC on his rant about broadcast critics, "If I am told to go into a room and point out everything green, I won't see...

To paraphrase AC on his rant about broadcast critics, "If I am told to go into a room and point out everything green, I won't see reds or yellows, only green". What? I thought that was new age psycho-babble bullshit, just like the whole there are very few absolutes, and everything is an opinion. When a person is a professional presenter, or announcer to a potentially international audience, representing a sport that promotes multi-billion-dollar industries and he/she mispronounces, misrepresents, slays basic grade school grammar and sentence structure, repeats over and over cliches and lame comparisons, or can't even state the competitors names correctly at times, that can certainly be defined as bad or not good. Contrary to AC's rant some people are good at some things, others not so much. AC seems like a good guy; he might have a career as a broadcaster, but demonstrating he was home schooled by quoting the latest book he read on Oprah's list and quoting its theories as gospel rather than just an alternative view or one way to look at things is a bad move. Thank God Matthes doesn't have a lot of listeners.

TeamGreen wrote:
WowI…mean…damn. Just…wow. Someone like Adam shares his perspective and opinion and this is the spin we get?Uh, no. Hell…no. Sometimes…y’all look and sound like you fucking hate this...

Wow

I…mean…damn. Just…wow. 

Someone like Adam shares his perspective and opinion and this is the spin we get?

Uh, no. Hell…no. 

Sometimes…y’all look and sound like you fucking hate this sport and the people in it. Sometimes, far too many of us seem to think we’ve got an exclusive take on the correct understanding or interpretation of all things Moto…well…again…uh, no…you don’t.

Personally, I like hearing all of the things he’s commenting on from his experiences and I’ve got just one thing to say to him…

Thanks for sharing your experiences with your fellow racing geeks! 

Manny, you were doing so well it seemed. AC doesn't need you to come in here and blast all of us who disagreed with him. Calm TF down.

The irony of AC sharing HIS opinion, and some of us sharing OUR opinion, and then you basically saying we don't have a right to have a conversation about it? If we do, we "hate the sport and the people in it"?? Seriously?

AC had a black and white take on a very nuanced conversation, which was seemingly out of character for him. Some of us discussed that. Apparently that isn't ok with you and you come in THAT hot? Wow. 

4
Spoonguy
Posts
3425
Joined
2/28/2022
Location
Mc Kean, PA US
10/21/2024 3:50pm
Spoonguy wrote:
To paraphrase AC on his rant about broadcast critics, "If I am told to go into a room and point out everything green, I won't see...

To paraphrase AC on his rant about broadcast critics, "If I am told to go into a room and point out everything green, I won't see reds or yellows, only green". What? I thought that was new age psycho-babble bullshit, just like the whole there are very few absolutes, and everything is an opinion. When a person is a professional presenter, or announcer to a potentially international audience, representing a sport that promotes multi-billion-dollar industries and he/she mispronounces, misrepresents, slays basic grade school grammar and sentence structure, repeats over and over cliches and lame comparisons, or can't even state the competitors names correctly at times, that can certainly be defined as bad or not good. Contrary to AC's rant some people are good at some things, others not so much. AC seems like a good guy; he might have a career as a broadcaster, but demonstrating he was home schooled by quoting the latest book he read on Oprah's list and quoting its theories as gospel rather than just an alternative view or one way to look at things is a bad move. Thank God Matthes doesn't have a lot of listeners.

TeamGreen wrote:
WowI…mean…damn. Just…wow. Someone like Adam shares his perspective and opinion and this is the spin we get?Uh, no. Hell…no. Sometimes…y’all look and sound like you fucking hate this...

Wow

I…mean…damn. Just…wow. 

Someone like Adam shares his perspective and opinion and this is the spin we get?

Uh, no. Hell…no. 

Sometimes…y’all look and sound like you fucking hate this sport and the people in it. Sometimes, far too many of us seem to think we’ve got an exclusive take on the correct understanding or interpretation of all things Moto…well…again…uh, no…you don’t.

Personally, I like hearing all of the things he’s commenting on from his experiences and I’ve got just one thing to say to him…

Thanks for sharing your experiences with your fellow racing geeks! 

As I disagree with AC, you can certainly disagree with me. No sweat here brother. 

5
JazzyJJ
Posts
1791
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
Nunya, WY US
10/21/2024 5:05pm
Jeremy200 wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong.1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a...

Correct me if I’m wrong.

1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a more accurate salary

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.The $1.8 figure AC quote was his...

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.


The $1.8 figure AC quote was his gross income between Kawasaki and Fox. He’s a 1099 and sole proprietor, so yes, he’s paying himself to run a business. He’s still probably putting a few hundred grand in the bank at the end of the year, after all those business expenses, cost of living, etc… still doing really good for a dirt bike rider.

“Salary” figures are gross, not net. This goes for W2 and 1099 tax returns.

1099? I was thinking he was W2. 1099 would be worse since they have to pay the full 15.3% tax rate. W2 pay half that. 

That 15.3% only applies to the first 160k or something like that, so when you're talking large figures it's not as big of an issue. 

10/21/2024 7:23pm Edited Date/Time 10/21/2024 7:26pm
Jeremy200 wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong.1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a...

Correct me if I’m wrong.

1.8m is the contract, so deduct operating expenses (trainer, travel, practice track expenses, vehicle, tax, manager fee) and then you get a more accurate salary

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.The $1.8 figure AC quote was his...

Bro, that’s not how the math works. “Salary” is your gross income. After taxes and expenses is your net income.


The $1.8 figure AC quote was his gross income between Kawasaki and Fox. He’s a 1099 and sole proprietor, so yes, he’s paying himself to run a business. He’s still probably putting a few hundred grand in the bank at the end of the year, after all those business expenses, cost of living, etc… still doing really good for a dirt bike rider.

“Salary” figures are gross, not net. This goes for W2 and 1099 tax returns.

1099? I was thinking he was W2. 1099 would be worse since they have to pay the full 15.3% tax rate. W2 pay half that. 

You’re both wrong, the majority of factory riders are corporations and have an EI number. Most are payed with a W2 through that corporation. 

The exception is MCR, they’re all W2 because Mike and Tony think it’s the right thing to do. 

1

Post a reply to: AC Salary Reveal

The Latest