When will Yamaha abandon the YZF engine design?

3/12/2015 11:08am
Yamaha didn't actually design the first monoshock(One shock-thus mono), but they were the first manufacture to put it on a production bike..... that is a fact...
Yamaha didn't actually design the first monoshock(One shock-thus mono), but they were the first manufacture to put it on a production bike..... that is a fact.

Yamaha was the first to use water cooling on a production
bike...fact

Were these systems improved upon....yes....but it still facts

Why am I even addressing you after you made such a ignorant post in the first place is beyond me.

still claiming the first gen yamaha mono shock is the same as a honda pro link cause they both use 1 shock,
well done!

and shinobi had water cooled heads for sale before Yamaha had water cooling

you cant address them there facts i posted cause they nailed you

funny for me, slightly embarrassing for you
erikcrvjl
Posts
351
Joined
11/9/2012
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
3/12/2015 11:15am
still claiming the first gen yamaha mono shock is the same as a honda pro link cause they both use 1 shock, well done! and shinobi...
still claiming the first gen yamaha mono shock is the same as a honda pro link cause they both use 1 shock,
well done!

and shinobi had water cooled heads for sale before Yamaha had water cooling

you cant address them there facts i posted cause they nailed you

funny for me, slightly embarrassing for you
Not saying you're right or wrong, but you post like a douchebag.
3/12/2015 6:16pm
TailSoHard wrote:
How long did it take another company to start making four-stroke MX bikes after Yamaha came out with the 400?? 5 years? People said the same...
How long did it take another company to start making four-stroke MX bikes after Yamaha came out with the 400?? 5 years? People said the same thing when that bike came out.
They also came out when the economy was booming and lots had disposable income.
People buying 60K Crew Cab diesels tossing on another 30 grand in shit, you name it.
Hell, people were buying Toyhaulers and motorhomes just to buy one.

Despite the reports, have you seen the gates at some local races? They run 4-5 classes together at once now at times.

Those days are gone for most. Now people are back to looking at cheap or cheaper recreation.

Where a dad can rebuild a bike after work. For a few extra bucks.
kiwifan
Posts
9786
Joined
10/31/2009
Location
USA
3/12/2015 7:03pm
I am sure there are a lot of other questions out there, such as...

When will Honda produce more power? When will the Kawasaki handle better/lose some weight? When will Yamaha have air forks? When will the Jap manufacturers produce FE's like KTM does to make more money and help their factory teams?

Answer to all of them is no one here knows, so pointless to ask.

The Shop

gerg
Posts
1539
Joined
10/29/2014
Location
AU
3/12/2015 7:11pm
90% of club riders wouldnt be able to identify any of the current bikes if they were blind folded.

Peike (especially) and Nicolleti seem to be indicating the 450s are just as potent as the 250s.
BobPA
Posts
8331
Joined
10/31/2013
Location
USA
3/12/2015 7:17pm
ChrisB10 wrote:
Yamahas are the fastest bike on the track right now have you been living under a rock?
Um, what riders and what track are you talking abut here?
Torco1
Posts
6585
Joined
4/27/2007
Location
Corona, CA, USA
3/12/2015 9:45pm
From my observation, the majority of people that don't like or don't understand the newer YZ's are the people that have never been on one.......they are amazing bikes.
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD, USA
3/12/2015 9:56pm
walleyeguy wrote:
Ummmmmmm........... You do know there are not to many "factory" stock bikes on the line right? I guess they'll start thinking about a redesign when they...
Ummmmmmm........... You do know there are not to many "factory" stock bikes on the line right? I guess they'll start thinking about a redesign when they finish putting up all their trophies from 1st place shootouts. lol.
Patar57 wrote:
He's an off road rider, his practice bike has FC suspension a slip on exhaust and and engine relocation kit. Seems pretty stock to me
mx965 wrote:
Whos your "buddy" and ive never even heard of that kit. All the pro ams i went to last year never seen one.
Gotta love the name droppers who can not say who the person is , lolz, sure ya do.
tomsti
Posts
9
Joined
7/22/2012
Location
Sammamish, WA, USA
3/12/2015 10:23pm
Crush wrote:
Don't think it's going anywhere considering how good the 250 is doing and the apparent massive improvement with the new model. Remember how much everyone hated...
Don't think it's going anywhere considering how good the 250 is doing and the apparent massive improvement with the new model.

Remember how much everyone hated the 97 Cr250?
I still own a 97 CR250 and hate it.
usafwx
Posts
1471
Joined
7/19/2012
Location
Trussville, AL, USA
3/12/2015 10:32pm Edited Date/Time 3/12/2015 10:43pm
Have loved all of my YZ's 09, 12, 14 and now my 15. The new design is amazing, and especially on the 250's I mean look at the outdoors last year, Yamaha is on to something and they are proving to be every bit as reliable (minus the shift stopper issue and impeller, few little things with initial RD). Only thing I can attest to disliking is the cockpit up front it is quite wide compared to riding my buddies KX. OP you question is kinda silly. Its like saying when will Suzuki build more reliable bikes? Each brand has their own things.
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
3/12/2015 10:40pm
moto0852 wrote:
The concept of something not being good simply because other manufactures don't copy it seems logical but is highly flawed. Two of the best developments to...
The concept of something not being good simply because other manufactures don't copy it seems logical but is highly flawed.

Two of the best developments to happen to dirt bikes lately have been hydraulic clutches and electric starts (KTM) and look how those get copied.
The electric start is a nice feature, not a make or break item though.

And the hydraulic clutch is only good if you like the feel it has.

There is a reason the Honda guys stopped using it. KTMs and Huskys come stock with them, thus they have to use them no matter what the rider likes.

kiwifan
Posts
9786
Joined
10/31/2009
Location
USA
3/12/2015 10:43pm
usafwx wrote:
Have loved all of my YZ's 09, 12, 14 and now my 15. The new design is amazing, and especially on the 250's I mean look...
Have loved all of my YZ's 09, 12, 14 and now my 15. The new design is amazing, and especially on the 250's I mean look at the outdoors last year, Yamaha is on to something and they are proving to be every bit as reliable (minus the shift stopper issue and impeller, few little things with initial RD). Only thing I can attest to disliking is the cockpit up front it is quite wide compared to riding my buddies KX. OP you question is kinda silly. Its like saying when will Suzuki build more reliable bikes? Each brand has their own things.
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable, unless you have facts/statistics that disprove that :-)
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
3/12/2015 10:43pm
The YZFs are certainly the ugliest, but all they really need is a better front fender. Dang, fix it already!
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
3/12/2015 10:50pm
kiwifan wrote:
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable...
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable, unless you have facts/statistics that disprove that :-)
Clearly more reliable? I don't think thats the case.

I would like to see the results as well.

Better yet, lets talk to actual mechanics that work in the industry.

kiwifan
Posts
9786
Joined
10/31/2009
Location
USA
3/12/2015 10:52pm
kiwifan wrote:
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable...
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable, unless you have facts/statistics that disprove that :-)
IceMan446 wrote:
Clearly more reliable? I don't think thats the case. I would like to see the results as well. Better yet, lets talk to actual mechanics that...
Clearly more reliable? I don't think thats the case.

I would like to see the results as well.

Better yet, lets talk to actual mechanics that work in the industry.

c'mon he made the statement that Yamahas were more reliable not me, then he quotes two instances where they were not.
usafwx
Posts
1471
Joined
7/19/2012
Location
Trussville, AL, USA
3/12/2015 10:56pm
usafwx wrote:
Have loved all of my YZ's 09, 12, 14 and now my 15. The new design is amazing, and especially on the 250's I mean look...
Have loved all of my YZ's 09, 12, 14 and now my 15. The new design is amazing, and especially on the 250's I mean look at the outdoors last year, Yamaha is on to something and they are proving to be every bit as reliable (minus the shift stopper issue and impeller, few little things with initial RD). Only thing I can attest to disliking is the cockpit up front it is quite wide compared to riding my buddies KX. OP you question is kinda silly. Its like saying when will Suzuki build more reliable bikes? Each brand has their own things.
kiwifan wrote:
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable...
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable, unless you have facts/statistics that disprove that :-)
Both $30 in parts and a 30 min fix. My 14 had 120 hours when I did a top end, valves were in spec the whole time, never an issue. The 15's addressed both parts, and its a first year totally redesigned bike. Name a total redesign that didn't have issues. The kawi's were plagued with FI/electrical issues the first years. My buddies 14 KX after 30 hours looked like a 2 year old bike and he already is addressing issues. This will of course be an endless debate. But Yamaha as a brand has proven to be more reliable as well as Hondas than the other manufacturers.
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
3/12/2015 11:00pm
kiwifan wrote:
c'mon he made the statement that Yamahas were more reliable not me, then he quotes two instances where they were not.
Here is a little info for recalls.

Yamaha is on the list. As are other brands, one more noticeable than others.

Info

usafwx
Posts
1471
Joined
7/19/2012
Location
Trussville, AL, USA
3/12/2015 11:10pm
kiwifan wrote:
c'mon he made the statement that Yamahas were more reliable not me, then he quotes two instances where they were not.
IceMan446 wrote:
Here is a little info for recalls.

Yamaha is on the list. As are other brands, one more noticeable than others.

Info

Cool link.

2 of the Yamaha Recalls were for the master link on the chain (DID) same recall but 2 listings. The big one was the rod casting issue the rods where out of spec and could cause engine lock up it was some 500 units. No brand is perfect but Yamaha's have been proven to be reliable and they stand behind their product, one of the only manufacturers that actually have a 30 day warranty.
kiwifan
Posts
9786
Joined
10/31/2009
Location
USA
3/12/2015 11:13pm
and as stated a few times in that forum taking care of the bike in terms of oil changes regulary, regular maint etc etc etc plays a big part in reliability....Honda had a problem with valves but that was like 9-10 years ago now

I guess the recalls (see Iceman446's link) tell more of a story....looks like Yamaha isnt the worse but nor is Suzuki or Honda (in fact they are better), you have to go way back to 2008 to see a Honda recall for example
usafwx
Posts
1471
Joined
7/19/2012
Location
Trussville, AL, USA
3/12/2015 11:51pm
usafwx wrote:
kiwifan wrote:
and as stated a few times in that forum taking care of the bike in terms of oil changes regulary, regular maint etc etc etc plays...
and as stated a few times in that forum taking care of the bike in terms of oil changes regulary, regular maint etc etc etc plays a big part in reliability....Honda had a problem with valves but that was like 9-10 years ago now

I guess the recalls (see Iceman446's link) tell more of a story....looks like Yamaha isnt the worse but nor is Suzuki or Honda (in fact they are better), you have to go way back to 2008 to see a Honda recall for example
Exactly, it really does come down to maintenance. Im pretty anal about it cause my bike is my girlfriend and only gets the best but if I went to another brand it would definitely be a Honda. All i know is my 14 as the guy in the thread was in amazing shape at 110 hours, so seems like the reliability reputation continues.
kiwifan
Posts
9786
Joined
10/31/2009
Location
USA
3/13/2015 12:04am
usafwx wrote:
kiwifan wrote:
and as stated a few times in that forum taking care of the bike in terms of oil changes regulary, regular maint etc etc etc plays...
and as stated a few times in that forum taking care of the bike in terms of oil changes regulary, regular maint etc etc etc plays a big part in reliability....Honda had a problem with valves but that was like 9-10 years ago now

I guess the recalls (see Iceman446's link) tell more of a story....looks like Yamaha isnt the worse but nor is Suzuki or Honda (in fact they are better), you have to go way back to 2008 to see a Honda recall for example
usafwx wrote:
Exactly, it really does come down to maintenance. Im pretty anal about it cause my bike is my girlfriend and only gets the best but if...
Exactly, it really does come down to maintenance. Im pretty anal about it cause my bike is my girlfriend and only gets the best but if I went to another brand it would definitely be a Honda. All i know is my 14 as the guy in the thread was in amazing shape at 110 hours, so seems like the reliability reputation continues.
:-)

I am thinking of going to Suzuki next year, depends on what comes out from all the manufacturers....I normally have the luxury of being able to try them all (except the KTM FE, but I aint forking out $10k+ for a frigging bike).
nytsmaC
Posts
5946
Joined
8/10/2009
Location
Frig Off, CA
3/13/2015 3:23am
I wonder why none of the other manufacturers have gotten creative with a downdraft intake. No need for a reverse cylinder. My 2002 TM 400MX had it, the airboot went up over the upper shock mount and then had a nice straight shot into the head. Take advantage of that perimeter frame, there's no need to curve the intake around the side of the shock spring on a 4stroke.
Crush
Posts
21097
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney, AU
3/13/2015 3:27am
IceMan446 wrote:
The electric start is a nice feature, not a make or break item though. And the hydraulic clutch is only good if you like the feel...
The electric start is a nice feature, not a make or break item though.

And the hydraulic clutch is only good if you like the feel it has.

There is a reason the Honda guys stopped using it. KTMs and Huskys come stock with them, thus they have to use them no matter what the rider likes.

Not for nothing, but wasn't the reason Trey and Eli went away from the Hydraulic clutch because they thought it was affecting their starts?

Those KTMs are doing ok off the start tho.
3/13/2015 4:13am
They should get rid of that single shock thing, That never really caught on.
Dtat720
Posts
1588
Joined
2/20/2015
Location
Flowood, MS, USA
3/13/2015 4:41am
My 2010 Honda was a gigantic pile of crap. Ask any Honda mechanic and they will tell you, the FI system was garbage. Only way to make it run on a consistent basis was to swap the 2011 fuel pump, throttle body, etc in the 2010's. Hence the reason for the big change in FI from 10-11. It sucked. Wouldnt start. Die on track. Fuel pumps burned out all the time. Couldnt hold an idle... Garbage. As soon as it sold, back on Yamaha and havent had a single problem like my KX and CRF buddies do
nytsmaC
Posts
5946
Joined
8/10/2009
Location
Frig Off, CA
3/13/2015 5:07am
Hydro clutch is nice and all but completely unneccessary a well lubed cable works just as well. My current bikes have hydro clutches but I wouldn't have been bothered at all if they were cable instead.
racerhansen
Posts
795
Joined
12/6/2010
Location
Aarhus, DK
3/13/2015 6:21am
They are probably the most the most popular bikes in Denmark and Germany at the moment, don't know about the rest of the world, but it seems like it's an awesome bike
joeellis
Posts
695
Joined
7/5/2013
Location
Wilson, NC, USA
3/13/2015 6:38am
kiwifan wrote:
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable...
a shift stopper and impeller are little things? I didnt see problems or recalls on any other manufacturer ...just saying that others are clearly more reliable, unless you have facts/statistics that disprove that :-)
IceMan446 wrote:
Clearly more reliable? I don't think thats the case. I would like to see the results as well. Better yet, lets talk to actual mechanics that...
Clearly more reliable? I don't think thats the case.

I would like to see the results as well.

Better yet, lets talk to actual mechanics that work in the industry.

kiwifan wrote:
c'mon he made the statement that Yamahas were more reliable not me, then he quotes two instances where they were not.
Go back and read what he actually said. He said 'every bit as reliable" not "more reliable." If I understand correctly (and maybe I didn't), the shaft was an item Yamaha purchased from an outside source and they received a bad batch. All manufacturers are making good and reliable bikes these days. They'd damn sure better for the prices they're charging.
BobPA
Posts
8331
Joined
10/31/2013
Location
USA
3/13/2015 7:11am
Man you Yamaha fanboys get butt hurt pretty easy if someone insults ol' blue.

IMO Yamahas have good engines (but all modern bikes do), but their ergonomics are just terrible. The yz450 is one of the most awkward feeling bike I have ever been on.....the shrouds are about 4 inches to wide, maybe more. One of my riding bros has a 14 250f. The engine is good, but it pushes terrible. I could not get that thing to stay in a rut if my life depended on it. i certainly don't see where their new 250f is soooo much better than a Honda or kawasaki.

Yamaha will never abandon that engine design.

Post a reply to: When will Yamaha abandon the YZF engine design?

The Latest