Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
Never watched any of Goebbels movies either.
I'm obviously historically bereft.
The Shop
Be good to see how they debunk the data.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/may/04/faulty-premise-2000-mule…
It’s impressive that ‘The Dems’/‘Deep State’ (insert name of your preferred bad guys) managed to pull off such a massive, complex, orchestrated, countrywide fraud in total secrecy, but the very highest court in the US can’t keep a draft decision confidential.
Rather like the UK Government being accused of masterminding a massive, secret Covid/Vaccine conspiracy when they can’t even keep a frickin’ party quiet.
Please don't be that disingenuous........
Meanwhile Mark Zuckerberg donates £400m and nobody bats an eyelid.
But thats fine, obviously.
Why would all the 'family ballots' need to be delivered in the middle of the night,via a 'non profit' organisation office.
Something wasn't on the up and up this election. Period. Sadly we will likely never know about it.
I have pointed out that the author/filmmaker is a convicted felon. Generally, felons are not regarded as having the highest levels of integrity, but it seems as though you are one of those that would selectively overlook that as long as you believe that the felon's work will reinforce your views.......
The data is the proof, it doesnt disappear if he doesnt make the film.
Hmmm
Pit Row
I've heard that Benjamin Franklin was a terrible husband, and not necessarily a stand up guy, but he certainly had his shit together politically.
legitimate information in the movie, you wouldn't want to know? With all we've seen and now coming
to light how the Hunter Laptop was hidden, you don't think enough information was hidden that could
have changed the election? You don't wonder why they won't let anybody investigate the images of
ballots that may or may not have fold marks in them? Everyone says show me something. A well
orchestrated plan would have many facets. So that if some facets did not pan out the rest would still
carry the day. Or if one facet was exposed, they could say "that's not enough to change the election"
Maybe you're right and nothing was wrong, but it could also be that the information is suppressed.
But how do you have a valid opinion without viewing both sides?
I have not seen the movie, but I will probably try to watch in the next week or 2.
I personally have a real hard time believing that legitimately more people voted for Basement Joe than Obama.
Does not compute!
TM
Texas absolutely had a right to go before the Supreme Court but they punted. It would have really put the
country in a bad place if that had gone through no matter how it turned out. You don't have to start your
case with "incontrovertible evidence" you get most of your evidence in the discovery stage. When the court
orders the other side to give the information. But if the court punts like they all did, you never get your opportunity
to investigate.
Here for your viewing pleasure: https://www.govtrack.us/misconduct
It's a relic of 1787 when the founding fathers were tired, impatient, and frustrated. They cobbled together this plan because they couldn’t agree on anything else while at the same time trying to appease the Southern states in order to get on board ratifying the Constitution.
The Electoral College was never intended to be the “perfect” system for picking the president as obviously it isn't. Not the least that the founders had no idea or crystal ball too look into how big and dramatically different the U.S. would change in a the next 200+ years.
At the time of the Philadelphia convention, no other country in the world directly elected its chief executive so the founders were literally winging it to form a system to do so. There were no political parties in 1787. They chose against the popular vote option because they thought 18th-century voters lacked the resources, education and national unity to be fully informed about presidential candidates, especially in rural areas. James Madison for instance represented Virginia, a state which enslaved people accounted for 60 percent of the population—knew that either a direct presidential election, or one with electors divvied up according to free white residents only, wouldn’t fly in the South. Thus leading to the ultra-racist 3/5th compromise for slaves. The compromise ensured that Southern states would ratify the Constitution and gave Virginia, home to more than 200,000 slaves, a quarter of the total electoral votes required to win the presidency at the time.
The creation of the Electoral College essentially was a political workaround for keeping slavery in U.S., and almost none of founding fathers’ assumptions about the electoral system proved true regarding the popular vote being a dangerous option.
Post a reply to: 2000 Mules.