2026 Beta 250 RX vs 2026 Yamaha YZ 250 dyno tests - stock and modded

Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA

VHM racing just did a dyno test of a brand new Yamaha YZ250, so now we can do a near head-to-head recent comparison of the 2026 Beta 250 RX and 2026 YZ250 carb'd engines. Same dyno, same dyno operator, but different day/ weather;

Stock engines---

YZ 250:  43.7 hp and 31.3 ft lbs of torque

250 RX:  46.2 hp and 32.3 ft lbs of torque

 

Modded engines w/ higher compression cylinder head and CDI change (note: YZ test also had the addition of an HGS exhaust, the RX used stock exhaust)----

YZ 250: 47.5 hp and 34.4 ft lbs of torque

250 RX: 48.3 hp and 34.1 ft lbs of torque

15
3
|
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/3/2026 12:40am

No direct comparison.. we dont even know if was the same dyno, and only a recollection rather than showing the original dyno results for direct comparison..

MXA quote; "They guessed the 250RX would be about 2 to 3 horsepower slower than the Yamaha YZ250, which peaked at 46 horsepower last time we checked it on the dyno".. so less reliable source for a direct comparison.

VHM has no loyalty to any manufacturer whereas MXA has made their test videos into market advertisements of various products. I have noticed that they do coddle the balls of the companies that butter their bread.

9
3
skypig
Posts
952
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
Caloundra, AU
7/3/2026 2:42am

I assume the KTM blows them both away - peak power wise?

1
1
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/3/2026 3:36am Edited Date/Time 7/3/2026 1:07pm
skypig wrote:

I assume the KTM blows them both away - peak power wise?

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd stock at 54 hp and 34.4 ft lbs of torque. With a 12 degree high compression piston and HGS silencer it dyno'd at 55.9 hp and 35.3 ft lbs of torque.

However, big caveat that people often do not understand. An average dyno is intended to measure relative power to compare the impact of modifications/ tuning on power, and less useful to measure absolute power since it is so sensitive to calibration. You have conservative dynos and "happy dynos" because of this.  VHM may have had their dyno recalibrated between 2023 and 2026.  Those horsepower numbers seem a bit too optimistic.  Their test of a carb'd 2019 KTM 250SX has even better numbers.

6
3

The Shop

BossWool2800
Posts
668
Joined
10/25/2025
Location
Jackson, TX, USA
7/3/2026 4:41am
skypig wrote:

I assume the KTM blows them both away - peak power wise?

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd...

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd stock at 54 hp and 34.4 ft lbs of torque. With a 12 degree high compression piston and HGS silencer it dyno'd at 55.9 hp and 35.3 ft lbs of torque.

However, big caveat that people often do not understand. An average dyno is intended to measure relative power to compare the impact of modifications/ tuning on power, and less useful to measure absolute power since it is so sensitive to calibration. You have conservative dynos and "happy dynos" because of this.  VHM may have had their dyno recalibrated between 2023 and 2026.  Those horsepower numbers seem a bit too optimistic.  Their test of a carb'd 2019 KTM 250SX has even better numbers.

The carbed 250SXs were beasts. 125s too. 

2
7/3/2026 6:39am

Yep, what this calls for is a proper shootout. Preferably with 250's of all religions across the board.

2
1
RDnutz
Posts
706
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO, USA
7/3/2026 6:50am
No direct comparison.. we dont even know if was the same dyno, and only a recollection rather than showing the original dyno results for direct comparison..MXA...

No direct comparison.. we dont even know if was the same dyno, and only a recollection rather than showing the original dyno results for direct comparison..

MXA quote; "They guessed the 250RX would be about 2 to 3 horsepower slower than the Yamaha YZ250, which peaked at 46 horsepower last time we checked it on the dyno".. so less reliable source for a direct comparison.

VHM has no loyalty to any manufacturer whereas MXA has made their test videos into market advertisements of various products. I have noticed that they do coddle the balls of the companies that butter their bread.

Kudos for merging coddling balls and buttering bread in same sentence 😆

6
1
bodycast
Posts
363
Joined
1/18/2020
Location
Monroe, NC, USA
7/3/2026 8:38am
skypig wrote:

I assume the KTM blows them both away - peak power wise?

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd...

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd stock at 54 hp and 34.4 ft lbs of torque. With a 12 degree high compression piston and HGS silencer it dyno'd at 55.9 hp and 35.3 ft lbs of torque.

However, big caveat that people often do not understand. An average dyno is intended to measure relative power to compare the impact of modifications/ tuning on power, and less useful to measure absolute power since it is so sensitive to calibration. You have conservative dynos and "happy dynos" because of this.  VHM may have had their dyno recalibrated between 2023 and 2026.  Those horsepower numbers seem a bit too optimistic.  Their test of a carb'd 2019 KTM 250SX has even better numbers.

Just say the tbi bikes make more power.

1
4
7/3/2026 8:54am

Stock exhaust on the Beta is Arrow. No slouch. 

 

1
1
Press516
Posts
5747
Joined
9/11/2018
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
Fantasy
7/3/2026 9:09am

Yes, a full on MX 250 2T shootout is required.  Yamaha - KTM - Husky - Beta for sure…. Would be cool if Fantic was allowed to play too.

4
1
mxaniac
Posts
582
Joined
9/9/2019
Location
Airway Heights, WA, USA
7/3/2026 4:04pm

Be aware, back in the day when all the Japanese manufactures made a 250 2T the YZ was the weakest on the dyno, but was the most beloved engine. The CR250 was the strongest on the dyno, but the most hated engine.

6
3
7/3/2026 4:38pm

The YZ is still very competitive for a 2001 engine…

5
BossWool2800
Posts
668
Joined
10/25/2025
Location
Jackson, TX, USA
7/3/2026 5:28pm
mxaniac wrote:
Be aware, back in the day when all the Japanese manufactures made a 250 2T the YZ was the weakest on the dyno, but was the...

Be aware, back in the day when all the Japanese manufactures made a 250 2T the YZ was the weakest on the dyno, but was the most beloved engine. The CR250 was the strongest on the dyno, but the most hated engine.

Here are some comments on the 2007 250 two-stroke shootout:

2007 Motocross Final Standings Overview
 

Rank

 
MotorcycleCore StrengthPrimary Weakness
1stSuzuki RM250Peerless, razor-sharp cornering and refined powerbandHeadshake at high speeds and soft stock fork valving
2ndYamaha YZ250Legendary Kayaba SSS forks and lightweight ProTaper barsMinor front-end push compared to the razor-sharp Suzuki
3rdKTM 250 SXExplosive, top-tier horsepower engineHarsh, unbalanced linkless PDS rear suspension
4thKawasaki KX250Highly stable chassis and plush overall rideViolent, quick-hitting light switch powerband
5thHonda CR250RBest ergonomics, high-speed stability, and build qualitySluggish, "hollow" low-end electronic power valve engine
1
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/3/2026 7:36pm Edited Date/Time 7/3/2026 7:44pm
skypig wrote:

I assume the KTM blows them both away - peak power wise?

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd...

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd stock at 54 hp and 34.4 ft lbs of torque. With a 12 degree high compression piston and HGS silencer it dyno'd at 55.9 hp and 35.3 ft lbs of torque.

However, big caveat that people often do not understand. An average dyno is intended to measure relative power to compare the impact of modifications/ tuning on power, and less useful to measure absolute power since it is so sensitive to calibration. You have conservative dynos and "happy dynos" because of this.  VHM may have had their dyno recalibrated between 2023 and 2026.  Those horsepower numbers seem a bit too optimistic.  Their test of a carb'd 2019 KTM 250SX has even better numbers.

bodycast wrote:

Just say the tbi bikes make more power.

VHM dyno confirmed that a carb'd 2019 KTM 250 SX made more horsepower and torque than a 2023 TBI KTM 250 SX, as I was saying.

3
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/3/2026 7:43pm

In addition to a 250 2T shootout, I am looking forward to a shootout of 300+cc 2 strokes, including the Kawasaki KX 327 vs. Beta 350 RX vs KTM 300 SX vs. Yamaha YZ with a 325cc big bore kit.

2
1
7/3/2026 8:09pm
In addition to a 250 2T shootout, I am looking forward to a shootout of 300+cc 2 strokes, including the Kawasaki KX 327 vs. Beta 350...

In addition to a 250 2T shootout, I am looking forward to a shootout of 300+cc 2 strokes, including the Kawasaki KX 327 vs. Beta 350 RX vs KTM 300 SX vs. Yamaha YZ with a 325cc big bore kit.

The bigger ones I'd like to see compared with the 350 four strokes as well, believe it or not. Much like the 250's, in many amateur and vet classes plus just bikes for practice and play, they're being cross-shopped by the same riders. 

1
CPR
Posts
6911
Joined
10/4/2018
Location
AU
7/3/2026 8:48pm

So you’re telling me that 25 years of development is worth about 2.5hp? Even less when modded 😂

Early 2000s KTM 250s regularly punched out 50+hp on various dynos, but they were a handful to ride. I expect the curve on the Beta is more linear?

2
1
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/3/2026 9:01pm
CPR wrote:
So you’re telling me that 25 years of development is worth about 2.5hp? Even less when modded 😂Early 2000s KTM 250s regularly punched out 50+hp on...

So you’re telling me that 25 years of development is worth about 2.5hp? Even less when modded 😂

Early 2000s KTM 250s regularly punched out 50+hp on various dynos, but they were a handful to ride. I expect the curve on the Beta is more linear?

?????????????

3
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/3/2026 11:10pm

VHM dyno tests;

2019 KTM 250 SX with carb;

Stock: 59.5 hp and 38.35 ft lbs of torque

Modded: 60.7 hp and 39.1 ft lbs of torque (with a 12 degree piston and HGS silencer)

 

2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection;

Stock: 54 hp and 34.4 ft lbs of torque

Modded: 55.9 hp and 35.3 ft lbs of torque (with a 12 degree piston and HGS silencer)

 

Not sure if this is apples to apples enough because there are 4 years separating the dyno runs, and I mentioned that dynos are impacted by calibration and need to be recalibrated from time to time, so we can't expect the dyno to be calibrated exactly the same over long periods of time. I would expect the carb to make a bit more power than the fuel injection, but not a massive difference.  A carb is a simple but efficient device that is excellent at atomization of the fuel, and engine builders for cars know this well. However, there are things the EFI can do that the carb can't.  EFI cars usually start easier, can adjust for altitude and weather, etc.

 

2
SmokinJoe439
Posts
2389
Joined
3/7/2012
Location
Renton, WA, USA
7/3/2026 11:21pm

No way my 2021 250sx is making 59hp more like 49 at best. 

2
Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/4/2026 12:22am

It can be a waste of time trying to compare absolute power levels with the average shop dyno and then trying to compare against different shops. That is not what these dynos were intended for.  That is why the initial VHM dyno comparison of the 2026 Beta 250 RX vs the 2026 Yamaha YZ250  is more meaningful.  People are getting hung up on the actual number instead of the relative difference measured on same dyno back to back. Nevertheless;

Pro Circuit dyno of 2019 KTM 250 SX. 

Stock:49.37 hp

After tweaking power valve: 51 hp

2019 2020 KTM250SX on Dyno - Pro Circuit Pipe and power valve adjustments = POWER !!

2
2
rsd47
Posts
528
Joined
6/3/2019
Location
GB
7/4/2026 12:27am

Put the 2 strokes in the shootouts! Make shootouts fun again 

1
Timo
Posts
1445
Joined
1/9/2021
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
7/4/2026 3:59am

I've read that if you go all out on a yz250 you can get 8hp over stock. I think that's probably about all you'll get out of it without a fairly major redesign. 

Timo
Posts
1445
Joined
1/9/2021
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
7/4/2026 4:03am Edited Date/Time 7/4/2026 4:04am

On pulpmx, Steve has said several times that ktm had them tear down magazine bikes, port them, and basically make them into the best version of that engine they could. Would have been better if they'd re-valved the suspension and left the engine stock 😂...

bodycast
Posts
363
Joined
1/18/2020
Location
Monroe, NC, USA
7/4/2026 5:55am
Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd...

Based on VHMs dyno tests, yes on hp, but less so on torque. Their latest test was on a 2023 KTM250SX with fuel injection. It dyno'd stock at 54 hp and 34.4 ft lbs of torque. With a 12 degree high compression piston and HGS silencer it dyno'd at 55.9 hp and 35.3 ft lbs of torque.

However, big caveat that people often do not understand. An average dyno is intended to measure relative power to compare the impact of modifications/ tuning on power, and less useful to measure absolute power since it is so sensitive to calibration. You have conservative dynos and "happy dynos" because of this.  VHM may have had their dyno recalibrated between 2023 and 2026.  Those horsepower numbers seem a bit too optimistic.  Their test of a carb'd 2019 KTM 250SX has even better numbers.

bodycast wrote:

Just say the tbi bikes make more power.

VHM dyno confirmed that a carb'd 2019 KTM 250 SX made more horsepower and torque than a 2023 TBI KTM 250 SX, as I was saying.

I was referring to the other manufacturers.

I ride in the woods so hp isnt nearly as important to me but I cannot find any source that shows a yz or rx making more power than a 250tbi from the factory.  The seat of the pants test agrees.  

I have wondered myself why the 250 tbi has been out for going on 4 years and not in one shootout with other carb bikes.

agn5008
Posts
1992
Joined
3/8/2021
Location
PA, PA, USA
Fantasy
7/4/2026 6:36am
mxaniac wrote:
Be aware, back in the day when all the Japanese manufactures made a 250 2T the YZ was the weakest on the dyno, but was the...

Be aware, back in the day when all the Japanese manufactures made a 250 2T the YZ was the weakest on the dyno, but was the most beloved engine. The CR250 was the strongest on the dyno, but the most hated engine.

Here are some comments on the 2007 250 two-stroke shootout:2007 Motocross Final Standings Overview Rank MotorcycleCore StrengthPrimary Weakness1stSuzuki RM250...

Here are some comments on the 2007 250 two-stroke shootout:

2007 Motocross Final Standings Overview
 

Rank

 
MotorcycleCore StrengthPrimary Weakness
1stSuzuki RM250Peerless, razor-sharp cornering and refined powerbandHeadshake at high speeds and soft stock fork valving
2ndYamaha YZ250Legendary Kayaba SSS forks and lightweight ProTaper barsMinor front-end push compared to the razor-sharp Suzuki
3rdKTM 250 SXExplosive, top-tier horsepower engineHarsh, unbalanced linkless PDS rear suspension
4thKawasaki KX250Highly stable chassis and plush overall rideViolent, quick-hitting light switch powerband
5thHonda CR250RBest ergonomics, high-speed stability, and build qualitySluggish, "hollow" low-end electronic power valve engine

Those 2006-2007 RM 250’s were my favorite bikes ever made. 

2
7/4/2026 7:42am
Timo wrote:
I've read that if you go all out on a yz250 you can get 8hp over stock. I think that's probably about all you'll get out...

I've read that if you go all out on a yz250 you can get 8hp over stock. I think that's probably about all you'll get out of it without a fairly major redesign. 

You can make significantly more hp, but at the the expense of the power band's width, making it unrideable.

Peak hp is a poor metric, usable torque across a broad rpm range is a better metric.

1
AJ565
Posts
2338
Joined
3/12/2012
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
7/4/2026 7:49am

No way my 2021 250sx is making 59hp more like 49 at best. 

My 2018 250sx with jetting and a PC pipe/silencer made almost 52hp on the dyno. KTM changed something in 2020 and those engines made a little more power, but I think it was only 1 or 2 more.

1
mxrose3
Posts
2352
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Delmar, DE, USA
7/4/2026 9:28am Edited Date/Time 7/4/2026 9:29am

The YZ is still very competitive for a 2001 engine…

1999 is when the current engine mold made it's debut.   Only minor changes have been made to it since then.

Tokyo_Tiddler
Posts
2147
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Somewhere in, NJ, USA
7/4/2026 1:15pm Edited Date/Time 7/7/2026 2:11am
Timo wrote:
I've read that if you go all out on a yz250 you can get 8hp over stock. I think that's probably about all you'll get out...

I've read that if you go all out on a yz250 you can get 8hp over stock. I think that's probably about all you'll get out of it without a fairly major redesign. 

You can make significantly more hp, but at the the expense of the power band's width, making it unrideable.Peak hp is a poor metric, usable torque...

You can make significantly more hp, but at the the expense of the power band's width, making it unrideable.

Peak hp is a poor metric, usable torque across a broad rpm range is a better metric.

Exactly!  Peak horsepower in not the metric to look at for a strong, easier to ride bike. You want a strong torque curve that starts early and has a nice linear curve.. one that starts high and has no bumps in the curve. This is what we feel when ride a bike and talk of "seat of the pants" feel. You feel torque not horsepower. Torque, not horsepower, provides for acceleration. Drag racers know that if they need a better ET, they need to build a motor with better torque, and if they want to improve their trap speed through the finish, they need to build a motor with better horsepower. Thats said, horsepower and torque are related.  Horsepower and torque curves will always cross at 5252 rpm on the dyno.  Mathematically, the relationship is HP = (Torque × RPM) ÷ 5,252.

1
1

Post a reply to: 2026 Beta 250 RX vs 2026 Yamaha YZ 250 dyno tests - stock and modded

The Latest