Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
You're not going to drag me down that rabbit hole, I gave zero opinion from which you could "know my stance."
I did provide a factual update of the criminal case, including the fact that this very successful athlete agent and former director of a major talent agency claims to be unable to fund his own defense. Unrelated, if it is subsequently found that a defendant submitted an inaccurate financial statement to secure public representation said defendant can be required to repay the government.
What if I told you the same guy who bought the Lawrence gear from mirtl was recently holding a raffle of some Jett Lawrence race worn gear as a cancer benefit? Posted about it on here, claims they know.
Maybe they do and this was the deal they came up with to make everyone closer to whole? Guy recoups some of the money he spent and it goes to decent cause. But I'm guessing they don't know. Or found out when the raffle got posted.
Can't make this shit up. One of the million vloggers out there really need to put together a reality show and pitch it to someone.
Where is this from?
Hence why a founding principal of this country is that force can be used to defend property the same way you defend life. Property is purchased with money, which is earned through sacrificing time. Ergo, when property is stolen from you, you are not losing just property but the part of your life you spent earning money to acquire it.
Regarding the public defender question, many people are sick and tired of paying for the mistakes of others when they can barely keep their heads above water. Simple as.
Mirtl could pay for a lawyer had he not blown all of his money, which is bound to upset some people. Wasserman are a bunch of scumbags from the top down and Mirtl appears to be one too. If there was ever a court case where both parties should lose big, this is one.
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
That's overstating the case for defense of property. Property is either fungible or compensable, so at least in principle, the victim of a property crime can be made whole (I know, the thief often lacks the means to make the victim whole - that's why I said "in principle). If you steal my car I can get it back from you, you can get me another just like it, or be compensated for its value. If you kill someone, none of these things are possible: You can't replace people, and no amount of money will ever make a bereaved person whole.
I'd think that the justification for using lethal force when defending your property has more to do with the fact that if someone is stealing your property, then it's reasonable to infer that they're a threat to your person as well as your property so you can defend yourself and your property on that basis. There's a reason you can shoot an intruder in your house if you catch him in the act of burglary but if you find out that your boss has been ripping you off on your pay you can't walk into his office and shoot him - even if the boss is stealing much more than the intruder.
Good luck to the Mirts, you’re gonna need it lol
We're on a tangent here, but what's the legal revisionism for why hanging horse thieves was baaad?
So is this Jacob Hayes, that threatened Jo with deportation, the same Jacob Hayes that is now employed by Jett and Hunter as their official coin purse warmer?
Yeah, it's a tangent so I don't want to say much, and I'm not certain I understand the question. I take it you're saying on my reasoning, it was wrong to hang horse thieves, and that there's something wrong with that? I've never given that any thought, but it's not obvious that I'm saying anything that would imply that. I was talking about why you can be justified in using lethal force to protect yourself and your property, you're talking about punishment. Was it justifiable to hang horse thieves? For many, a horse was essential and depriving a man of his horse could have had very serious consequences. Your life and livelihood could literally depend on your horse so it was a serious punishment for a serious crime. Too harsh? I don't know - the conditions were harsh so I'm not going to judge from my present comfort.
did wasserman dismiss their claims? I was bored and went looking for an update on this case....
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69723117/wasserman-media-group-llc-v-mirtl/
Casey Wasserman is busy trying to save his own ass in the Epstein matter. Meanwhile, the Lawrence tribe continues to do business with the Wasserman Group. The Wolfman doesn’t like it when the Lawrence-Wasserman relationship is mentioned on the Vitals….. 😂
Is it just the feds chasing wire fraud now, I looked it up the other day and didn't find much.
This whole thing has been a comical shitshow.
i assume it's still the Lawrence camp suing him for the return of cash, and the feds preparing to prosecute. Dark days for mr. mirtl.
That case was dismissed over a year ago. The civil case in Florida and the arbitration in California are on going. Oh and the federal criminal case in Florida.
How could you not take WMG at their word? Classy bunch of people there. If anyone ever succeeds in getting the Epstein files opened, Mirtl will be the least of their worries.
Racy emails between a Hollywood mogul tapped to head the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles and Jeffrey Epstein’s convicted sex-trafficking madam were revealed in the latest document dump tied to the late pedophile.
Casey Wasserman, the 51-year-old CEO of Wasserman Media Group, traded a flurry of risqué messages with Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003 — just two years into his marriage with then-wife Laura Ziffren — including one in which he asked to set up a sensual massage.
“Where are you, I miss you,” the chairman and president of the 2028 Olympics organizing committee wrote to Epstein’s confidante on Apr. 1, 2003.
“I will be in NYC for 4 days starting april 22…can we book that massage now?”
https://nypost.com/2026/01/31/us-news/la-olympics-boss-casey-wassermans-racy-emails-with-ghislaine-maxwell-while-he-was-married-revealed-in-epstein-files/
Imagine if this was related to the case at all. That would be a crazy reality to live in
Pit Row
It does call into the character of a person involved and also leads to question the circle and people he associates with.
I think the only real connection to the Mirtl case is the fact that much of the moto media coverage of the case instantly took the side of WMG, assuming that they are an upstanding big business run by experienced entertainment professionals who wouldn’t be involved in shady business practices. At the very least, it seems very apparent that the long time CEO of the organization hangs out with the scum of the earth. I’d be willing to bet damn near everything that the WMG corporate jet has landed a time or two on Epstein Island. I hope one day we finally get to find out.
Mirtl misappropriated funds or he didn’t. What could Casey Wasserman’s character have to do with that? Wasserman may be a scumbag but Mirtl would be no less a thief if that’s what the facts show. It’s the facts that matter. The courts don’t take anyone at their word to the exclusion of facts.
Wasserman being a reptilian lizard person has nothing to do with Mirtl being a scum bag
Welcome to the American justice system.
WTF what did he do, went out the state to go to a LL qualifiers for his kid? Where is that kiddo his mom?
where has that info been posted?
Parole? That’s a pretty specific legal term. Unless Mirtl has already been convicted in a case I’m unaware of, I suspect Matthes means he violated the conditions of his pretrial release and was ordered to wear an ankle monitor or was restricted geographically.
Those are two very different things.
It'll be hard to ever get the money back, it was an account that he had access to, this was always going to end in a settlement. NDA's will be signed and no one will ever know what really happened. He might get in trouble for using business funds to pay for personal purchases, but I bet he doesn't go to jail for this.
Looks like Mirts is claiming BS on the ankle monitor
What does ‘restyled with Meta AI’ mean? Did he just use AI to remove it?
Post a reply to: Lucas Mirtl Update, Case Dismissed!?