No Flag or Red Cross Violations at Texas: Kellen Brauer

2/23/2026 11:17am Edited Date/Time 2/23/2026 11:19am
ACBailey89 wrote:
So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are...

So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are on doesn’t mean you can’t jump it.

Of course if there’s a Red Cross flag on the jump which is usually in conjunction with the red lights then you can’t jump.

The lights were added because the riders complained they couldn’t see the Red Cross flag or didn’t have enough time to adjust for it without a pre warning which is essentially what those lights are.

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.It *could* make sense for them...

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.

They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.

It *could* make sense for them to not penalise the 250 riders for jumping with just the lights on, but it doesn't make any sense to not penalise the 450 riders for jumping with a red cross flag.

The response from the AMA here is contradictory, but most importantly does not follow their rulebook.

Shitshow.

It doesn't follow the rule book, which is what ACTUALLY matters, but their explanation makes more sense than you're seeing.

They are basically saying because the lead in lights weren't on for the 450 guys, it's plausible they didn't see the flag in time so no penalty.

It's still absolutely ridiculous they aren't following the book, and it's BS to not penalize anyone. But their explanation ALMOST makes sense IF it was in the rule book. But it's not. So #neverchange

aeffertz
Posts
12364
Joined
7/16/2015
Location
La Crosse, WI US
2/23/2026 11:18am

So the precedent set now is you can jump on red lights and Red Cross flags, despite the rule book saying otherwise. Got it…

5
1
2/23/2026 11:19am

My conspiracy theory: I'm pretty sure the AMA screwed up the lights and the flag in both races and the only way to cover it up is to act like nothing ever happened.

13
OldTech
Posts
1195
Joined
1/13/2024
Location
Decatur , AL US
2/23/2026 11:21am
sumdood wrote:
Fuck my head hurts just reading those rules, the AMA expects these guys to process a decision in 1/00th of a second when they're in full...

Fuck my head hurts just reading those rules, the AMA expects these guys to process a decision in 1/00th of a second when they're in full tilt boogie race mode. Come on they aint sitting at a desk lol.  If all the red light does is "alert them to be alert" lol. Isn't that the same as a yellow flag ?  Why throw something extra in there ? Yellow - use caution potential hazard, white with red cross - don't jump. Sure there's going to be timing problems but that's with any system, there's always going to be the guy that sees it right as he committed, you can't eliminate that scenario with any system. They expect a lot out of these riders, they should pay them more. To me simple is better and they all know what the flags mean. Just use the flags ? 🤷‍♂️      

 

Edit- To me, RED means stop, always has. Red flag, red light whatever, IMO red should only mean one thing, Stop.  

It's simple, the yellow and red lights are the same thing, mostly and sometimes. 

8

The Shop

Johnny Ringo
Posts
7887
Joined
1/11/2016
Location
Tombstone, AZ US
2/23/2026 11:21am

Could you guys imagine if it was Deegs and not Brown LMAO

13
1
JazzyJJ
Posts
1759
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
Nunya, WY US
2/23/2026 11:27am
HonDawg17 wrote:
My conspiracy theory: I'm pretty sure the AMA screwed up the lights and the flag in both races and the only way to cover it up...

My conspiracy theory: I'm pretty sure the AMA screwed up the lights and the flag in both races and the only way to cover it up is to act like nothing ever happened.

Doesn't matter why the flag is out, there's no amended rule that someone must be gravely injured for the flag rules to apply. All it says is when the flag is present, you must roll. That's it, full stop

4
1
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 11:34am
ACBailey89 wrote:
So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are...

So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are on doesn’t mean you can’t jump it.

Of course if there’s a Red Cross flag on the jump which is usually in conjunction with the red lights then you can’t jump.

The lights were added because the riders complained they couldn’t see the Red Cross flag or didn’t have enough time to adjust for it without a pre warning which is essentially what those lights are.

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.It *could* make sense for them...

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.

They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.

It *could* make sense for them to not penalise the 250 riders for jumping with just the lights on, but it doesn't make any sense to not penalise the 450 riders for jumping with a red cross flag.

The response from the AMA here is contradictory, but most importantly does not follow their rulebook.

Shitshow.

No it's not contradictory, it's crystal clear.

8
MotoDad32
Posts
231
Joined
7/23/2017
Location
Beverly Hills, CA US
2/23/2026 11:38am
ACBailey89 wrote:
So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are...

So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are on doesn’t mean you can’t jump it.

Of course if there’s a Red Cross flag on the jump which is usually in conjunction with the red lights then you can’t jump.

The lights were added because the riders complained they couldn’t see the Red Cross flag or didn’t have enough time to adjust for it without a pre warning which is essentially what those lights are.

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.It *could* make sense for them...

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.

They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.

It *could* make sense for them to not penalise the 250 riders for jumping with just the lights on, but it doesn't make any sense to not penalise the 450 riders for jumping with a red cross flag.

The response from the AMA here is contradictory, but most importantly does not follow their rulebook.

Shitshow.

aees wrote:

No it's not contradictory, it's crystal clear.

Crystal clear it is.  Correct it is not.

Kinda like saying "the sky is blue because God chose that color".  The explanation is crystal clear, but clarity doesn't imply correctness.

 

2
1
JBlain619
Posts
1819
Joined
6/10/2010
Location
Severna Park, MD US
2/23/2026 11:39am
ACBailey89 wrote:
So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are...

So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are on doesn’t mean you can’t jump it.

Of course if there’s a Red Cross flag on the jump which is usually in conjunction with the red lights then you can’t jump.

The lights were added because the riders complained they couldn’t see the Red Cross flag or didn’t have enough time to adjust for it without a pre warning which is essentially what those lights are.

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.It *could* make sense for them...

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.

They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.

It *could* make sense for them to not penalise the 250 riders for jumping with just the lights on, but it doesn't make any sense to not penalise the 450 riders for jumping with a red cross flag.

The response from the AMA here is contradictory, but most importantly does not follow their rulebook.

Shitshow.

aees wrote:

No it's not contradictory, it's crystal clear.

I'm beginning to think your name is Mike.

 

Make sure you pick up when you see a call from a 410 area code today LOL.

7
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 11:43am
JBlain619 wrote:
From the 2026 Rulebook:e. White Flag with Red Cross or Red Flashing Lights 1. This flag or a red flashing light may be displayed at the...

From the 2026 Rulebook:

e. White Flag with Red Cross or Red Flashing Lights 1. This flag or a red flashing light may be displayed at the beginning of a triple jump or a series of jumps to indicate a potentially hazardous situation on or near the racetrack in an area that may not be clearly visible to oncoming Riders. 2. This flag indicates a significant safety concern and takes precedence over all other flags. 3. Until the Rider is clear of the incident: 2026 AMA SUPERCROSS CHAMPIONSHIP RULEBOOK © 2026 by AMA. No portion of these rules may be copied or used without the express written consent of AMA. 34 i. Riders must follow all directions given by race officials. ii. Passing is prohibited. iii. Riders must traverse all obstacles individually, absolutely NO double, triple, step on/off, etc. iv. Riders must exercise extreme caution and not race or accelerate in an unsafe manner. 4. When displayed on a triple jump, the area of concern is, at minimum, the whole obstacle, i.e., Riders must not jump any section of the triple because a Rider may be down on the face of the triple or after the first or second jump, hidden from view and in a vulnerable position. 5. These rules apply anytime a Rider is on the racetrack, including sighting and cool down laps. 

 

aees wrote:
Not everything applicable to a race is in the rule book.If they state before season or during riders meeting they will place reinforcement systems at 1-2...

Not everything applicable to a race is in the rule book.

If they state before season or during riders meeting they will place reinforcement systems at 1-2 places on the track and declare those yellow flag then that is fine.

Will be interesting to see the PR. They can't change it without telling anyone of course 😄

Tyler D wrote:
The class of things pertinent here ARE in the rulebook. One document rule. You can't have ancillary material that literally conflicts with the rules in the...

The class of things pertinent here ARE in the rulebook. One document rule. You can't have ancillary material that literally conflicts with the rules in the rulebook and then claim the rulebook governs. 

 

We do have this thing called the Internet where documents can be hosted and revised on the fly; and notifications sent out to interested parties. It's crazy, I know. 

Sorry, but you are not a race director or know how the rules can and are applied. There are many things that can be adapted based on track and racing conditions.

Just because race length is stated in the book, you mean they shouldn't be allowed to shorten the race in case of bad weather?

In the rules it's also is room already for race director to make decisions around penalties. It isn't black and white, per the rules in the book, if you read everything.

 

16
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 11:52am
ACBailey89 wrote:
So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are...

So what I’m getting from this is those lights are just to warn riders about a possible upcoming issue, and just because the red lights are on doesn’t mean you can’t jump it.

Of course if there’s a Red Cross flag on the jump which is usually in conjunction with the red lights then you can’t jump.

The lights were added because the riders complained they couldn’t see the Red Cross flag or didn’t have enough time to adjust for it without a pre warning which is essentially what those lights are.

Exactly, nothing different from having a yellow flag warning about a later red cross flag.

Really don't get why it's so hard to comprehend. Is it optimal? No. But its very clear.

But then again, its dirtbikers we are dealing with 😄

1
4
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 11:56am
Their explanation doesn't make any sense.They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.It *could* make sense for them...

Their explanation doesn't make any sense.

They have it one way for the 250 situation, and the other way for the 450.

It *could* make sense for them to not penalise the 250 riders for jumping with just the lights on, but it doesn't make any sense to not penalise the 450 riders for jumping with a red cross flag.

The response from the AMA here is contradictory, but most importantly does not follow their rulebook.

Shitshow.

aees wrote:

No it's not contradictory, it's crystal clear.

MotoDad32 wrote:
Crystal clear it is.  Correct it is not.Kinda like saying "the sky is blue because God chose that color".  The explanation is crystal clear, but clarity...

Crystal clear it is.  Correct it is not.

Kinda like saying "the sky is blue because God chose that color".  The explanation is crystal clear, but clarity doesn't imply correctness.

 

The only time this is not correct, is of the riders haven't gotten the information which I have heard, they have.

Otherwise, it's indisputable. They could have punished Tomac and the others, but would have gotten shit because the assigned lead in lights wasn't working.  If they work in a pair, the correct thing is of course not to penalize.

Will see the aftermaths. Curious to Hondas take on this, Lars is a smart guy and we will hear if they haven't gotten the info I guess.

1
2
ML512
Posts
16853
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
2/23/2026 11:58am Edited Date/Time 2/23/2026 12:07pm
welp, Vital has done its thing and regurgitated the AMA's PR piece which entirely exonerates them of any fault or wrong doing (as always). Think ML...

welp, Vital has done its thing and regurgitated the AMA's PR piece which entirely exonerates them of any fault or wrong doing (as always). Think ML or Lew will follow up with, I don't know, some actual questions? Or nah?

Go watch the post-race show, I dug up this info before the statement came out and heavily criticized their ruling. I stood outside of the AMA rig until midnight in the cold to get an interview and they wouldn’t do one.

I’m done with you, go pound sand, you’re such a dick. Everytime you criticize with the most asshole tone, get called out and crawl back saying how you’re not trying to start shit, you’re not a dick, etc.

You’re an internet dick, dude. Go touch grass and find a life.

41
Tyler D
Posts
2023
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
La, CA US
2/23/2026 11:59am
aees wrote:
Not everything applicable to a race is in the rule book.If they state before season or during riders meeting they will place reinforcement systems at 1-2...

Not everything applicable to a race is in the rule book.

If they state before season or during riders meeting they will place reinforcement systems at 1-2 places on the track and declare those yellow flag then that is fine.

Will be interesting to see the PR. They can't change it without telling anyone of course 😄

Tyler D wrote:
The class of things pertinent here ARE in the rulebook. One document rule. You can't have ancillary material that literally conflicts with the rules in the...

The class of things pertinent here ARE in the rulebook. One document rule. You can't have ancillary material that literally conflicts with the rules in the rulebook and then claim the rulebook governs. 

 

We do have this thing called the Internet where documents can be hosted and revised on the fly; and notifications sent out to interested parties. It's crazy, I know. 

aees wrote:
Sorry, but you are not a race director or know how the rules can and are applied. There are many things that can be adapted based...

Sorry, but you are not a race director or know how the rules can and are applied. There are many things that can be adapted based on track and racing conditions.

Just because race length is stated in the book, you mean they shouldn't be allowed to shorten the race in case of bad weather?

In the rules it's also is room already for race director to make decisions around penalties. It isn't black and white, per the rules in the book, if you read everything.

 

You're talking about discretionary calls to cover ambiguous or unforeseen circumstances;  for which processes to handle both are alluded to in the rulebook

Were debating the validity of a standing rule extraneous to and conflicting with the rule book. Complete red herring. 

1
1
MotoDad32
Posts
231
Joined
7/23/2017
Location
Beverly Hills, CA US
2/23/2026 12:07pm
aees wrote:

No it's not contradictory, it's crystal clear.

MotoDad32 wrote:
Crystal clear it is.  Correct it is not.Kinda like saying "the sky is blue because God chose that color".  The explanation is crystal clear, but clarity...

Crystal clear it is.  Correct it is not.

Kinda like saying "the sky is blue because God chose that color".  The explanation is crystal clear, but clarity doesn't imply correctness.

 

aees wrote:
The only time this is not correct, is of the riders haven't gotten the information which I have heard, they have.Otherwise, it's indisputable. They could have...

The only time this is not correct, is of the riders haven't gotten the information which I have heard, they have.

Otherwise, it's indisputable. They could have punished Tomac and the others, but would have gotten shit because the assigned lead in lights wasn't working.  If they work in a pair, the correct thing is of course not to penalize.

Will see the aftermaths. Curious to Hondas take on this, Lars is a smart guy and we will hear if they haven't gotten the info I guess.

Fair enough.  I'd assumed the riders didn't get the memo, as it wasn't mentioned by any rider in any of the the post-race interviews I've listened to.  If they did, then I guess AMA is on firm ground.

1
2/23/2026 12:08pm

Let’s add more light colors to the lights. 
🤦‍♂️

Red Cross flag showing has to be shown for everyone before you put it away or turn off clown lights. 

1
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 12:09pm
Tyler D wrote:
The class of things pertinent here ARE in the rulebook. One document rule. You can't have ancillary material that literally conflicts with the rules in the...

The class of things pertinent here ARE in the rulebook. One document rule. You can't have ancillary material that literally conflicts with the rules in the rulebook and then claim the rulebook governs. 

 

We do have this thing called the Internet where documents can be hosted and revised on the fly; and notifications sent out to interested parties. It's crazy, I know. 

aees wrote:
Sorry, but you are not a race director or know how the rules can and are applied. There are many things that can be adapted based...

Sorry, but you are not a race director or know how the rules can and are applied. There are many things that can be adapted based on track and racing conditions.

Just because race length is stated in the book, you mean they shouldn't be allowed to shorten the race in case of bad weather?

In the rules it's also is room already for race director to make decisions around penalties. It isn't black and white, per the rules in the book, if you read everything.

 

Tyler D wrote:
You're talking about discretionary calls to cover ambiguous or unforeseen circumstances;  for which processes to handle both are alluded to in the rulebookWere debating...

You're talking about discretionary calls to cover ambiguous or unforeseen circumstances;  for which processes to handle both are alluded to in the rulebook

Were debating the validity of a standing rule extraneous to and conflicting with the rule book. Complete red herring. 

Yes, correct, one of cautionary yellow flags didn't work and they work in pair, so it's a discretionary call if not stated in the rule book.

They did the only right thing.

Again, under the assumption that riders was aware.

 

1
JBlain619
Posts
1819
Joined
6/10/2010
Location
Severna Park, MD US
2/23/2026 12:12pm
aees wrote:
Sorry, but you are not a race director or know how the rules can and are applied. There are many things that can be adapted based...

Sorry, but you are not a race director or know how the rules can and are applied. There are many things that can be adapted based on track and racing conditions.

Just because race length is stated in the book, you mean they shouldn't be allowed to shorten the race in case of bad weather?

In the rules it's also is room already for race director to make decisions around penalties. It isn't black and white, per the rules in the book, if you read everything.

 

Tyler D wrote:
You're talking about discretionary calls to cover ambiguous or unforeseen circumstances;  for which processes to handle both are alluded to in the rulebookWere debating...

You're talking about discretionary calls to cover ambiguous or unforeseen circumstances;  for which processes to handle both are alluded to in the rulebook

Were debating the validity of a standing rule extraneous to and conflicting with the rule book. Complete red herring. 

aees wrote:
Yes, correct, one of cautionary yellow flags didn't work and they work in pair, so it's a discretionary call if not stated in the rule book.They...

Yes, correct, one of cautionary yellow flags didn't work and they work in pair, so it's a discretionary call if not stated in the rule book.

They did the only right thing.

Again, under the assumption that riders was aware.

 

So will you say they did the wrong thing with Seth in the playoffs last year by docking him 5 points for jumping on red lights? The rule hasn't changed since.

 

1
Shred
Posts
1506
Joined
10/21/2021
Location
Brighton, CO US
Fantasy
2/23/2026 12:20pm Edited Date/Time 2/23/2026 12:22pm

Could you guys imagine if it was Deegs and not Brown LMAO

Okay…better yet.  Can you imagine if it was Deegs instead of Jo?  …and Jo that won?  Is there honestly anyone here that doesn’t think a penalty comes down immediately?  I do…no doubt in my mind….based on history.  Seriously…because if most of us think it comes out differently…well….the AMA is a farce.  Regardless….even having the discussion shows how bad the AMA has been.

5
sumdood
Posts
8585
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
San Clemente, CA US
Fantasy
2/23/2026 12:24pm
sumdood wrote:
Fuck my head hurts just reading those rules, the AMA expects these guys to process a decision in 1/00th of a second when they're in full...

Fuck my head hurts just reading those rules, the AMA expects these guys to process a decision in 1/00th of a second when they're in full tilt boogie race mode. Come on they aint sitting at a desk lol.  If all the red light does is "alert them to be alert" lol. Isn't that the same as a yellow flag ?  Why throw something extra in there ? Yellow - use caution potential hazard, white with red cross - don't jump. Sure there's going to be timing problems but that's with any system, there's always going to be the guy that sees it right as he committed, you can't eliminate that scenario with any system. They expect a lot out of these riders, they should pay them more. To me simple is better and they all know what the flags mean. Just use the flags ? 🤷‍♂️      

 

Edit- To me, RED means stop, always has. Red flag, red light whatever, IMO red should only mean one thing, Stop.  

OldTech wrote:

It's simple, the yellow and red lights are the same thing, mostly and sometimes. 

Aaah got it thanks. So the lights are kind of like a check engine light, you can do something, or not do something. 👌👍  

4
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 12:25pm
Tyler D wrote:
You're talking about discretionary calls to cover ambiguous or unforeseen circumstances;  for which processes to handle both are alluded to in the rulebookWere debating...

You're talking about discretionary calls to cover ambiguous or unforeseen circumstances;  for which processes to handle both are alluded to in the rulebook

Were debating the validity of a standing rule extraneous to and conflicting with the rule book. Complete red herring. 

aees wrote:
Yes, correct, one of cautionary yellow flags didn't work and they work in pair, so it's a discretionary call if not stated in the rule book.They...

Yes, correct, one of cautionary yellow flags didn't work and they work in pair, so it's a discretionary call if not stated in the rule book.

They did the only right thing.

Again, under the assumption that riders was aware.

 

JBlain619 wrote:
So will you say they did the wrong thing with Seth in the playoffs last year by docking him 5 points for jumping on red lights...

So will you say they did the wrong thing with Seth in the playoffs last year by docking him 5 points for jumping on red lights? The rule hasn't changed since.

 

I don't remember all the details. Last year lead in lights didn't exist so no matter what the situation isn't comparable.

1
toroP
Posts
4453
Joined
4/6/2009
Location
Cincinnati, OH US
2/23/2026 12:27pm

So, when do riders have to roll the jumps???

1
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 12:27pm Edited Date/Time 2/23/2026 12:27pm
sumdood wrote:
Fuck my head hurts just reading those rules, the AMA expects these guys to process a decision in 1/00th of a second when they're in full...

Fuck my head hurts just reading those rules, the AMA expects these guys to process a decision in 1/00th of a second when they're in full tilt boogie race mode. Come on they aint sitting at a desk lol.  If all the red light does is "alert them to be alert" lol. Isn't that the same as a yellow flag ?  Why throw something extra in there ? Yellow - use caution potential hazard, white with red cross - don't jump. Sure there's going to be timing problems but that's with any system, there's always going to be the guy that sees it right as he committed, you can't eliminate that scenario with any system. They expect a lot out of these riders, they should pay them more. To me simple is better and they all know what the flags mean. Just use the flags ? 🤷‍♂️      

 

Edit- To me, RED means stop, always has. Red flag, red light whatever, IMO red should only mean one thing, Stop.  

OldTech wrote:

It's simple, the yellow and red lights are the same thing, mostly and sometimes. 

sumdood wrote:

Aaah got it thanks. So the lights are kind of like a check engine light, you can do something, or not do something. 👌👍  

I have taken one of my yellow engine lights out for 10 years with Torque app 😄 So I did something, but really nothing about it 🤷

 

2
1
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 12:30pm
toroP wrote:

So, when do riders have to roll the jumps???

If you see it, always on red cross. To be safe. But you won't get a penalty if assigned lead in lights doesn't work or are on. They work in pair on those sections.

There is apparently 1-2 sections with lead-in lights assigned as I understood it and they get info on which sections during riders meeting. I Could be a bit off on this one, but that is my understanding.

1
2
aeffertz
Posts
12364
Joined
7/16/2015
Location
La Crosse, WI US
2/23/2026 12:31pm
aees wrote:
Yes, correct, one of cautionary yellow flags didn't work and they work in pair, so it's a discretionary call if not stated in the rule book.They...

Yes, correct, one of cautionary yellow flags didn't work and they work in pair, so it's a discretionary call if not stated in the rule book.

They did the only right thing.

Again, under the assumption that riders was aware.

 

JBlain619 wrote:
So will you say they did the wrong thing with Seth in the playoffs last year by docking him 5 points for jumping on red lights...

So will you say they did the wrong thing with Seth in the playoffs last year by docking him 5 points for jumping on red lights? The rule hasn't changed since.

 

aees wrote:

I don't remember all the details. Last year lead in lights didn't exist so no matter what the situation isn't comparable.

And yet, there is nothing in the rule book regarding “lead in lights”

8
1
Spat24
Posts
1233
Joined
10/23/2009
Location
OR US
Fantasy
2/23/2026 12:34pm

This is a bit crazy - just think of the next race, if a rider only got one of the flag or red light and thinks I can still jump - but there actually is a pile up or a rider down.  Not a good scenario.

9
mxjeff575
Posts
449
Joined
7/14/2011
Location
Festus, MO US
2/23/2026 12:37pm

These lead in lights are tricky, as you have to know where they are located so you can know if you can jump on Red Cross flag or not.  So if i don't see a lead in light and i do see a red cross flag, i have to remember if i am in a section that has them or not.  If indeed I am in a section with no lead in lights, then roll the next jump, but if i remember i am in a section with lead in lights, but i didn't see them, then I can jump on the Red Cross flag without penalty.  Got it.  Wow Sad

5
brocster
Posts
4461
Joined
6/9/2009
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
2/23/2026 12:37pm
toroP wrote:

So, when do riders have to roll the jumps???

After lots of math and signals whilst trying to manage a race and navigate obstacles.  

7
ARM670
Posts
2081
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH US
2/23/2026 12:37pm

I heard Tim Cotter and Brian Deegan met with the AMA about this.

7
1
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
2/23/2026 12:38pm Edited Date/Time 2/23/2026 12:39pm
JBlain619 wrote:
So will you say they did the wrong thing with Seth in the playoffs last year by docking him 5 points for jumping on red lights...

So will you say they did the wrong thing with Seth in the playoffs last year by docking him 5 points for jumping on red lights? The rule hasn't changed since.

 

aees wrote:

I don't remember all the details. Last year lead in lights didn't exist so no matter what the situation isn't comparable.

aeffertz wrote:

And yet, there is nothing in the rule book regarding “lead in lights”

Yeah that is a bit strange and not optimal since they could have avoided a lot of misunderstandings.

 Typically you don't review rule book if they are officially released so could be that 2026 rules where already released when this was implemented. They only do clarifications. Maybe this was needed to be worked out into last minute with Feld since it requires equipment I assume it's there's? "Flags" are provided by racing organisation, not AMA. Now we are also dealing with system and software, switches.

But again, as long as riders have the information it's fine. 

1
1

Post a reply to: No Flag or Red Cross Violations at Texas: Kellen Brauer

The Latest