SCOTT Goggles rumours

TAUTOG
Posts
1660
Joined
1/27/2023
Location
Mohrsville, PA, USA
12/18/2025 12:58pm
3strokemx wrote:

Changing Scott lenses is on-par with solving a Rubiks cube, but atleast the owner didn't sue a MX track.

Ditto

take the gum out of your mouth and 🖕 EKS

4
1
Gravel
Posts
1849
Joined
2/22/2014
Location
Ridgecrest, CA, USA
12/18/2025 1:20pm

I’d still wear Scott 89s if they were available.. simple, comfortable and affordable..

7
johnk408
Posts
1094
Joined
1/20/2022
Location
Ft Mitchell, KY, USA
12/18/2025 1:53pm Edited Date/Time 12/18/2025 1:54pm
BrysonP204 wrote:
$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

IMG 1531 5

Just bought new prospects for $29 from Rocky Mountain 


https://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/riding-gear/scott-prospect-amplifier…

6
1
Tyler D
Posts
2292
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
La, CA, USA
12/18/2025 7:47pm

On the bicycle side, the company is a dumpster fire. They had two CEOs for awhile. Not surprised 

3
1

The Shop

12/18/2025 10:33pm

Scott goggles have always been good.  

12/18/2025 10:34pm
Gravel wrote:

I’d still wear Scott 89s if they were available.. simple, comfortable and affordable..

Bro they ARE available.  They make some 89 Heritage model 

3
mxnick
Posts
1010
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
Nor Cal, CA, USA
12/18/2025 11:52pm

I saw the post about when it was only Scott and Smith (and Oakley). Bet 'ya didnt know that the founder of EKS Rich Taylor's dad, Hook, used to run Smith back in the day....

2
Motofinne
Posts
11490
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
12/19/2025 12:26am
3strokemx wrote:

Changing Scott lenses is on-par with solving a Rubiks cube, but atleast the owner didn't sue a MX track.

They really fucked up the lens swapping system design with the Prospect. I really don't understand how they didn't invest in R&D and new molds to fix it.

It's a deal breaker for anyone that has been in contact with the competitions offerings. 

6
12/19/2025 12:54am
3strokemx wrote:
What happened to Smith goggles though? Haven't seen a pair since the last ice age.I knew a guy named Scott Smith and understandably it was a...

What happened to Smith goggles though? Haven't seen a pair since the last ice age.

I knew a guy named Scott Smith and understandably it was a hard choice for him to decide which goggles to buy.

Smith made a huge push in mountain bike helmets. They look terrible. Goggles are decent though. 

2
mx_563
Posts
2198
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/19/2025 2:11am

 

2
JAFO92
Posts
5658
Joined
3/21/2016
Location
BFE, TX, USA
12/19/2025 5:54am Edited Date/Time 12/19/2025 6:05am

Bro they ARE available.  They make some 89 Heritage model 

I did not know that.  You know of any vendors still selling any?   Id like to snag a few pair before they go adios.

Falcon
Posts
12416
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA, USA
12/19/2025 6:37am
Gravel wrote:

I’d still wear Scott 89s if they were available.. simple, comfortable and affordable..

Too big for my face. 😒

Now, if Oakley made their original "O" Frames from the '80s, I'd be all over that. 

5
yak651
Posts
8724
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI, USA
Fantasy
12/19/2025 7:04am
BrysonP204 wrote:
$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

IMG 1531 5
johnk408 wrote:

Just bought new prospects for $29 from Rocky Mountain 


https://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/riding-gear/scott-prospect-amplifier…

Thanks, just bought 2 pairs, cheaper than just buying a replacement amplifier lens. For those that haven’t used the amplifier lens, give them a try they work great!

BoxcarWilly
Posts
1179
Joined
10/5/2023
Location
Thunder Bay, ON, CA
12/19/2025 7:12am

Scott Fury is the best value in the MX Goggle industry. 

3
2
racerhansen
Posts
795
Joined
12/6/2010
Location
Aarhus, DK
12/19/2025 8:20am
3strokemx wrote:

Changing Scott lenses is on-par with solving a Rubiks cube, but atleast the owner didn't sue a MX track.

Motofinne wrote:
They really fucked up the lens swapping system design with the Prospect. I really don't understand how they didn't invest in R&D and new molds to...

They really fucked up the lens swapping system design with the Prospect. I really don't understand how they didn't invest in R&D and new molds to fix it.

It's a deal breaker for anyone that has been in contact with the competitions offerings. 

I loved my Prospects until I saw a lens change on a pair of 100% Armegas. Safe to say I only use Armegas and Airbrakes now

mx317
Posts
5332
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/19/2025 8:25am
Falcon wrote:

Too big for my face. 😒

Now, if Oakley made their original "O" Frames from the '80s, I'd be all over that. 

Even the ones in the early 2000s were good before the update. They were small enough to fit in your helmet and still gave good vision. 

FGR01
Posts
6109
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
USA
Fantasy
12/19/2025 10:03am
3strokemx wrote:

Changing Scott lenses is on-par with solving a Rubiks cube, but atleast the owner didn't sue a MX track.

Motofinne wrote:
They really fucked up the lens swapping system design with the Prospect. I really don't understand how they didn't invest in R&D and new molds to...

They really fucked up the lens swapping system design with the Prospect. I really don't understand how they didn't invest in R&D and new molds to fix it.

It's a deal breaker for anyone that has been in contact with the competitions offerings. 

I loved my Prospects until I saw a lens change on a pair of 100% Armegas. Safe to say I only use Armegas and Airbrakes now

The 100% lens system is awesome.  But the Prospect 2.0's just fit me great and have the hugest nose opening of about any goggle ever made.  The Armega's are tall top to bottom with that extra lens design feature on the top that serves no purpose other than to make them push down on your nose.   I'll take a fit that allows me to breathe over easy lens changes that I might do once a month or so.

2
mxbrian15
Posts
596
Joined
12/8/2015
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
12/19/2025 10:25am
BrysonP204 wrote:
$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

IMG 1531 5
johnk408 wrote:

Just bought new prospects for $29 from Rocky Mountain 


https://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/riding-gear/scott-prospect-amplifier…

You mean $60?

2
1
Dave v3.0
Posts
689
Joined
7/15/2022
Location
Ozark, AL, USA
12/19/2025 10:32am

I still haven't gotten over Carrera getting out of the MX business.  Give me a pair of Carrera 98's with an amber lens and I'm good.  And based on what the old ones are selling for on Ebay, collectors haven't gotten over them either.🙄

Switched to Scott 89's in the late 70's along with everyone else.  It will be a sad day if the name disappears.

3
1
Gravel
Posts
1849
Joined
2/22/2014
Location
Ridgecrest, CA, USA
12/19/2025 10:43am
Gravel wrote:

I’d still wear Scott 89s if they were available.. simple, comfortable and affordable..

Bro they ARE available.  They make some 89 Heritage model 

I found some Heritage edition stuff, but it’s new goggles in old colors. Where are you seeing 89 heritage? 

Village Idiot
Posts
2585
Joined
5/19/2023
Location
MXoN - a term used by newbs, goobs and rubes, PW, USA
12/19/2025 10:46am
BrysonP204 wrote:
$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

IMG 1531 5
johnk408 wrote:

Just bought new prospects for $29 from Rocky Mountain 


https://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/riding-gear/scott-prospect-amplifier…

mxbrian15 wrote:

You mean $60?

They were $29 as of yesterday.

FGR01
Posts
6109
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
USA
Fantasy
12/19/2025 11:14am
johnk408 wrote:

Just bought new prospects for $29 from Rocky Mountain 


https://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/riding-gear/scott-prospect-amplifier…

mxbrian15 wrote:

You mean $60?

They were $29 as of yesterday.

Everyone clicking that link drove up the interest in their algorithm and jacked the price!  😅

8
JAFO92
Posts
5658
Joined
3/21/2016
Location
BFE, TX, USA
12/19/2025 11:27am
Dave v3.0 wrote:
I still haven't gotten over Carrera getting out of the MX business.  Give me a pair of Carrera 98's with an amber lens and I'm good...

I still haven't gotten over Carrera getting out of the MX business.  Give me a pair of Carrera 98's with an amber lens and I'm good.  And based on what the old ones are selling for on Ebay, collectors haven't gotten over them either.🙄

Switched to Scott 89's in the late 70's along with everyone else.  It will be a sad day if the name disappears.

Yessir, that was a really good brand.  I asked The Man for the backstory on Baruffaldis at Rio years ago,  because I noticed he wore them long ago and they were the first brand I ever wore.  (got mine at a Hodaka dealership)  He told me they were ski goggles and Euro MXers used them because they were readily available and the brand came across the pond when the racers did.

2
adamdf
Posts
2132
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
St. Michael, BB
12/19/2025 12:50pm Edited Date/Time 12/19/2025 12:51pm
kage173 wrote:
Seems like they're going heavy into high end mountain bikes. And I mean the actual bikes, not just gear. I wonder if they have some kind...

Seems like they're going heavy into high end mountain bikes. And I mean the actual bikes, not just gear. I wonder if they have some kind of competitive advantage there?

Scott already produces high end Mountain bikes and Road bikes. It is all under the Scott Sports brand. They are not expanding into anything, if anything they would be contracting and downsizing the bicycle side as the bicycle industry is in major turmoil at the moment with several large brands closing their doors this year including Nukeproof, GT Bicycles and others!  And KTM learned the hard way with mountain bikes as well. 

A YouTuber recently did a video explains a lot about the company. Check it out.

EDIT: I see someone also posted the same above. But still worth a watch if you want to understand the brand, don't miss this one.

 

3
1
johnk408
Posts
1094
Joined
1/20/2022
Location
Ft Mitchell, KY, USA
12/19/2025 12:54pm
mxbrian15 wrote:

You mean $60?

Must have been some weekly deal as I definitely paid $29 as did someone above it appears.

1
12/19/2025 12:57pm
BrysonP204 wrote:
$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

$45 each or $220 shipped for all. 5 extra lenses and goggle bag for each 

IMG 1531 5
johnk408 wrote:

Just bought new prospects for $29 from Rocky Mountain 


https://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/riding-gear/scott-prospect-amplifier…

mxbrian15 wrote:

You mean $60?

They were $29 yesterday.

1
mxracer666
Posts
777
Joined
10/28/2010
Location
NE Iowa, IA, USA
12/19/2025 12:58pm
Gravel wrote:

I’d still wear Scott 89s if they were available.. simple, comfortable and affordable..

Falcon wrote:

Too big for my face. 😒

Now, if Oakley made their original "O" Frames from the '80s, I'd be all over that. 

For whatever reason many of the high-end goggles don't sit right on my face and seal poorly.  I got a pair of the Oakley kids goggles (small frame, simple, basic) They sit against my face and not on the helmet and I'm a happy camper! 

1
Tyler D
Posts
2292
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
La, CA, USA
12/19/2025 1:41pm Edited Date/Time 12/19/2025 1:42pm
kage173 wrote:
Seems like they're going heavy into high end mountain bikes. And I mean the actual bikes, not just gear. I wonder if they have some kind...

Seems like they're going heavy into high end mountain bikes. And I mean the actual bikes, not just gear. I wonder if they have some kind of competitive advantage there?

adamdf wrote:
Scott already produces high end Mountain bikes and Road bikes. It is all under the Scott Sports brand. They are not expanding into anything, if anything...

Scott already produces high end Mountain bikes and Road bikes. It is all under the Scott Sports brand. They are not expanding into anything, if anything they would be contracting and downsizing the bicycle side as the bicycle industry is in major turmoil at the moment with several large brands closing their doors this year including Nukeproof, GT Bicycles and others!  And KTM learned the hard way with mountain bikes as well. 

A YouTuber recently did a video explains a lot about the company. Check it out.

EDIT: I see someone also posted the same above. But still worth a watch if you want to understand the brand, don't miss this one.

 

this is great. their bikes are very cleverly designed in typical swiss fashion, but their aftersale support, parts supply, documentation, and warranty process are all abysmal. e.g. they recalled a popular mtb for a loose shock pivot bolt on an INTERNALLY housed shock and failed to post it anywhere outside of a nebulous tsb for their dealers. failure of the shock bolt results in destruction of the frame. rather than notify owners, they just YOLO'D because they didnt want to deal with the hassle of actually supporting customers. everything they make is awesome is theory but absolutely shit in practice/execution. 

they really should just leave the US market rather than half-ass it like they have been for years. 

 

****also, it was like pulling teeth just trying to get a light transmission chart for their moto goggle lenses. zero fucking documenation on what any of the tints actually do. i think they had to send me somethign from the snow side. just a delulu company****

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/BikeMechanics/comments/zfrw1k/anyone_else_incredibly_frustrated_with_scott/

feel like recently, things with Scott have just gotten worse. Everything from B2B communication, dealer support in general with replacement parts and warranties, and also just in general their manufacturing decisions, especially with the Sparks?

They recently had the whole product recall with the shock mounting bolt on the Spark, various design flaws in the frame, numerous electrical issues with eRides, really slow warranty process and a seriously lacking B2B support.

We've had two cross-country racers in their mid teens come in with cracked sparks that happened quite close to the recall, and Scott straight up wouldn't do anything for them because they decided they wouldn't warranty any cracked frames as a result of the bad shock mounting bolt. Not even send them a front triangle or offer them at crash replacement cost. Then we had another guy with a Spark RC who DID get a new front triangle more than a month after the recall, and after waiting nearly two months for it to arrive, they didn't even send the frame with the proper frame plugs or bearings. And why are they using plastic headset cups? It just doesn't make any sense.

We've had to wait more than a week at times to get responses on quite simple emails, almost taken close to two months for small replacement parts & warranties, and have noticed a massive lack of eRide support in regards to replacement parts, info and general response.

 

1
1
SPYGUY
Posts
2169
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
12/19/2025 2:20pm
3strokemx wrote:

Changing Scott lenses is on-par with solving a Rubiks cube, but atleast the owner didn't sue a MX track.

Motofinne wrote:
They really fucked up the lens swapping system design with the Prospect. I really don't understand how they didn't invest in R&D and new molds to...

They really fucked up the lens swapping system design with the Prospect. I really don't understand how they didn't invest in R&D and new molds to fix it.

It's a deal breaker for anyone that has been in contact with the competitions offerings. 

Are we talking about how the tabs that you must pry on to release the lens are incredibly small and hard to get proper leverage on with your fingers?
I'm always fearful that I'm going to rip a fingernail off trying to get the tab open.

That said, I believe they've updated the lens removal process with the Prospect 2.0, but I haven't tried them myself. I personally prefer the Fury to the Prospect but based on this thread I'm guessing no updates to the Fury are coming anytime soon.

Post a reply to: SCOTT Goggles rumours

The Latest