Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
I'm thinking I've spent enough time on this one, so, yeah that's in the other thread.
Pretty sure this is at the point where the people who care have made up their minds one way or the other, and the people who don't care have moved on.
If Mirtl believes he's been defamed his lawyer can bring a counterclaim/cross-complaint in the action, and if the allegations in federal court are false seek Rule 11 sanctions (below). Some states have similar rules for state court, and much of the standard also is embedded in the Rules of Professional Conduct that expose lawyers to discipline (suspension/disbarment/etc.). If Mirtl's correct in his position and facts he loses nothing by pursuing these remedies given he's already embroiled in a lawsuit. Everything outside of that really is just noise and posturing; not uncommon, sometimes strategic, often a bad idea once litigation has started.
Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions
(a) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name—or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. The paper must state the signer's address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Unless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an affidavit. The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney's or party's attention.
(b) Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper—whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it—an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:
(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;
(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.
(c) Sanctions.
(1) In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the violation. Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm must be held jointly responsible for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.
(2) Motion for Sanctions. A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates Rule 11(b) . The motion must be served under Rule 5 , but it must not be filed or be presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets. If warranted, the court may award to the prevailing party the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred for the motion.
(3) On the Court's Initiative. On its own, the court may order an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why conduct specifically described in the order has not violated Rule 11(b) .
(4) Nature of a Sanction. A sanction imposed under this rule must be limited to what suffices to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated. The sanction may include nonmonetary directives; an order to pay a penalty into court; or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of part or all of the reasonable attorney's fees and other expenses directly resulting from the violation.
(5) Limitations on Monetary Sanctions. The court must not impose a monetary sanction:
(A) against a represented party for violating Rule 11(b)(2) ; or
(
on its own, unless it issued the show-cause order under Rule 11(c)(3) before voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party that is, or whose attorneys are, to be sanctioned.
(6) Requirements for an Order. An order imposing a sanction must describe the sanctioned conduct and explain the basis for the sanction.
I haven’t followed every dig and zag of this. Has Mirtl articulated his side of the story anywhere yet? The allegations seemed pretty specific, but haven’t seen anyone go as far as to refute any of them.
Wasserman is in cahoots w given new dumb
That says everything
If by articulated you mean: an alcohol (and possibly drug) driven, word vomit of misspelled nothing soup, with zero punctuation... yeah, yeah he did. LOL
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
That's a good one.
Good information, but I believe Mirtl's complaint is that he has been deformed.
That'll happen when your jeans are way too tight....
All the talk about Mirtl's pants reminds me of Randy from TPB. "Because they're a little tight Rick, and I wanna kick your ASS."
Man's gotta eat.
Big update from Mirtl!
If there were 2 boys they would eat the wolf? Obviously a nod to his brother the lawyer. 2 wolves 1 phone type of scenario.
Flying economy class will do that to you
is Mirtl the wolf in this allegory? he's going to eat all the lawrences and his former protege? I'd get a Protective Order on this guy if i were them. he's mentally gone and probably has very little to lose. will be the biggest downfall in the history of the sport before its over. he's too delusional to take his lumps and let this go.
Remember what happened to Mickey Thomson.
Window seat on the commercial flight, posting story with stupid text and 2Pac for the music choice....talk about gangsta 😆
Don't forget the mismatched shoelaces.
His backyard night golf game is strong through!
I think that’s just the gradient fade filter that’s applied to it.
Pit Row
no you're thinking 2 girls 1 cup.
is Myrtle the girl or the cup?
All they need is James Stewart’s team of accountants and lawyers in Lakeland Fl.
Look at the pea brain trying to put a sentence together. Did he get RC's help on this? FFS.
Neither, he is the turd.
Is English his first language, I'm Aussie, but wtf is he crapping on about?
Is he implying it wasn't just him fleecing the Lawrence's ?
People are pussies. How is this not funny?
Post a reply to: Update from Wasserman - Lucas Mirtl Case