Levi

Farmer J
Posts
978
Joined
11/26/2022
Location
Steelville, MO US
3/3/2025 1:13am
Unless I have some bad number, back in the 80s NASCAR on superspeedways went way faster than they do now. Bill Elliott went over 210 mph...

Unless I have some bad number, back in the 80s NASCAR on superspeedways went way faster than they do now. Bill Elliott went over 210 mph in 1987 and this year’s pole sitter was 187 mph. The cars are safer, but I don’t see that as progression. 

For good measure heres the video. Also if you ever saw the restrictor plates put on the cars its crazy. I would guess they could get 1000hp without them. It's 4 little holes im guessing the size of a quarter on the intake that's bigger than a cantaloupe.  

https://youtu.be/Dg4JoDmlgWw?feature=shared

3
3/3/2025 1:34am
Farmer J wrote:
For good measure heres the video. Also if you ever saw the restrictor plates put on the cars its crazy. I would guess they could get...

For good measure heres the video. Also if you ever saw the restrictor plates put on the cars its crazy. I would guess they could get 1000hp without them. It's 4 little holes im guessing the size of a quarter on the intake that's bigger than a cantaloupe.  

https://youtu.be/Dg4JoDmlgWw?feature=shared

Thanks for the video. I think it’s ridiculous that a car from 50 years ago can smoke one from today. It should be able to go as fast or faster and remain relatively safe. 

1
Farmer J
Posts
978
Joined
11/26/2022
Location
Steelville, MO US
3/3/2025 1:59am
Farmer J wrote:
For good measure heres the video. Also if you ever saw the restrictor plates put on the cars its crazy. I would guess they could get...

For good measure heres the video. Also if you ever saw the restrictor plates put on the cars its crazy. I would guess they could get 1000hp without them. It's 4 little holes im guessing the size of a quarter on the intake that's bigger than a cantaloupe.  

https://youtu.be/Dg4JoDmlgWw?feature=shared

Thanks for the video. I think it’s ridiculous that a car from 50 years ago can smoke one from today. It should be able to go...

Thanks for the video. I think it’s ridiculous that a car from 50 years ago can smoke one from today. It should be able to go as fast or faster and remain relatively safe. 

55 at that too. I have no dog in the fight I do understand people's concerns. But it seems Nascar is all about safety now. Should the ama do the same? I can see both sides. I could only imagine what the new cars could do if they let them run full bore. People casually talking about nascar and mentioning how the older cars were faster and they look at you like you're nuts.

2
mb
Posts
774
Joined
7/22/2014
Location
Columbia, SC US
3/3/2025 2:04am

He started looking off about 1/2 lap before the crash, slow to get his feet back on the pegs when exiting corners, etc. Was expecting him to back it down, rough crash hope he has a quick recovery.

 

1
2

The Shop

3strokemx
Posts
2553
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
US
3/3/2025 4:57am
mb wrote:
He started looking off about 1/2 lap before the crash, slow to get his feet back on the pegs when exiting corners, etc. Was expecting him...

He started looking off about 1/2 lap before the crash, slow to get his feet back on the pegs when exiting corners, etc. Was expecting him to back it down, rough crash hope he has a quick recovery.

 

I noticed the same thing, from about 9:45 left on the clock you can see he's not cornering great and it looks like the shock is losing compression damping. 


I wonder if he was having a shock issue that contributed to the crash?

image 1265

4
Talon
Posts
830
Joined
1/18/2022
Location
Beaver, UT US
Fantasy
3/3/2025 5:15am
CPR wrote:
My opinion on the injury argument- the riders have got faster, the bikes have got faster, the tracks have got faster. Easiest thing to change is...

My opinion on the injury argument- the riders have got faster, the bikes have got faster, the tracks have got faster. Easiest thing to change is the tracks. Slow em down.

These guys Egos and balls are too big. They would still just hit it wide open and crash lol

2
truck
Posts
3646
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY US
Fantasy
3/3/2025 6:10am

Most motorsports have to slow things down every so often. Hopefully we won't wait until we have a high profile death or two that forces the issue like other series have. Moto should start thinking about it now.

Not sure how you'd even go about slowing tracks down in a way that they wouldn't just launch walls or make quads where it wasn't intended etc. 

4
Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA US
3/3/2025 7:56am
CPR wrote:
My opinion on the injury argument- the riders have got faster, the bikes have got faster, the tracks have got faster. Easiest thing to change is...

My opinion on the injury argument- the riders have got faster, the bikes have got faster, the tracks have got faster. Easiest thing to change is the tracks. Slow em down.

....but that will upset the "fans" who demand their entertainment. 

 

1
7
3/3/2025 8:30am
Thank God we don't have more than 9 whoops anymore or dragons backs. I was about done with sx this year after Levi's crash. Kenny's win...

Thank God we don't have more than 9 whoops anymore or dragons backs. I was about done with sx this year after Levi's crash. Kenny's win and him still having a shot at the title have me a lifeline 

for me Supercross is something to watch in the winter, just waiting for the outdoors to start!

5
3/3/2025 8:41am

Restrictor plates on 250s and 450s for SX with the goal being to cut 25% of their power?

1
Racerman967
Posts
678
Joined
1/1/2019
Location
Littleton, CO US
3/3/2025 8:47am
You know, NASCAR and other forms of racing can go faster, and build faster machines.  There are rules to keep the speeds down.  Most riders that...

You know, NASCAR and other forms of racing can go faster, and build faster machines.  There are rules to keep the speeds down.  Most riders that actually rode 125 and 250 2 strokes will flat out say. They were slower compared to todays bikes.  So the question you'd have to ask, is the speed worth it?  Just because these new 4 stroke 250 and 450 bikes can be this fast, is it right?  Hell, the ev bike will be even faster.  

So, do we need them as fast as possible?  Or, do we need to limit how fast the bikes are?  I'd personally say, make the sound 80db and it will fall into place.  You wouldn't necessarily need to slow them down, sound would do that. But no ecm tricks for the 80db. 

Plus, the start devices allow for faster take off from the line, thus higher end of run top speed.  Additionally, the start devices allow for more racers to get good starts, so more chance of pileup. 

There are just a few things that help add to the injured list.  Jmho

Unless I have some bad number, back in the 80s NASCAR on superspeedways went way faster than they do now. Bill Elliott went over 210 mph...

Unless I have some bad number, back in the 80s NASCAR on superspeedways went way faster than they do now. Bill Elliott went over 210 mph in 1987 and this year’s pole sitter was 187 mph. The cars are safer, but I don’t see that as progression. 

And Bobby Allison damn near ended up in the grandstands. Just because you can does not mean you should

2
1
hellion
Posts
1086
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
3/3/2025 9:31am

Are bikes too fast now? Maybe.  But they’re not that much faster than a works 250 2 stroke, at least not in the 250 class where there are just as many injuries.  

Also tracks were probably sketchier 20 and 30 years ago too so I doubt that’s the issue.  

Recently I’ve started to realize that bikes just handle so damn well now that everyone from kids to vets, novices to pros, are going faster.  And speed is the difference.  When things go wrong, they go bad really fast and the impacts are huge. 

Even if they somehow restricted power, I don’t think it would change anything at this point.  

Equipment that the riders mostly won’t wear won’t help either.  It’s just a dangerous sport.  I love it still but I’m glad my speedier days were in the 80’s and 90’s and not now.  

1
Flatliner
Posts
4149
Joined
11/3/2009
Location
CA
3/3/2025 11:08am
truck wrote:
Most motorsports have to slow things down every so often. Hopefully we won't wait until we have a high profile death or two that forces the...

Most motorsports have to slow things down every so often. Hopefully we won't wait until we have a high profile death or two that forces the issue like other series have. Moto should start thinking about it now.

Not sure how you'd even go about slowing tracks down in a way that they wouldn't just launch walls or make quads where it wasn't intended etc. 

I hope another death does not occur.  Jason Cirletta (sp) died in sx late 90's early 2000's.  I don't remember details.

1
Radical
Posts
2855
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA US
3/3/2025 11:30am
You know, NASCAR and other forms of racing can go faster, and build faster machines.  There are rules to keep the speeds down.  Most riders that...

You know, NASCAR and other forms of racing can go faster, and build faster machines.  There are rules to keep the speeds down.  Most riders that actually rode 125 and 250 2 strokes will flat out say. They were slower compared to todays bikes.  So the question you'd have to ask, is the speed worth it?  Just because these new 4 stroke 250 and 450 bikes can be this fast, is it right?  Hell, the ev bike will be even faster.  

So, do we need them as fast as possible?  Or, do we need to limit how fast the bikes are?  I'd personally say, make the sound 80db and it will fall into place.  You wouldn't necessarily need to slow them down, sound would do that. But no ecm tricks for the 80db. 

Plus, the start devices allow for faster take off from the line, thus higher end of run top speed.  Additionally, the start devices allow for more racers to get good starts, so more chance of pileup. 

There are just a few things that help add to the injured list.  Jmho

Unless I have some bad number, back in the 80s NASCAR on superspeedways went way faster than they do now. Bill Elliott went over 210 mph...

Unless I have some bad number, back in the 80s NASCAR on superspeedways went way faster than they do now. Bill Elliott went over 210 mph in 1987 and this year’s pole sitter was 187 mph. The cars are safer, but I don’t see that as progression. 

It's progression technology wise because the cars are going faster than they were since the latest rule changes and max displacement was lowered.

If the max displacement hadn't been lowered since the 70's, cars would be doing 250MPH by now.

1
3/3/2025 11:51am
Radical wrote:
It's progression technology wise because the cars are going faster than they were since the latest rule changes and max displacement was lowered.If the max displacement...

It's progression technology wise because the cars are going faster than they were since the latest rule changes and max displacement was lowered.

If the max displacement hadn't been lowered since the 70's, cars would be doing 250MPH by now.

I don’t care what displacement they are. I see a NASCAR from 1970 going significantly faster than today, which is mind boggling. 

1
3/3/2025 11:54am

And Bobby Allison damn near ended up in the grandstands. Just because you can does not mean you should

They should have worked on technology that would keep them going the same speed safely, not slowing them down. From a racing standpoint, the cars are inferior today. Racing is about going faster.

Racerman967
Posts
678
Joined
1/1/2019
Location
Littleton, CO US
3/3/2025 12:04pm

And Bobby Allison damn near ended up in the grandstands. Just because you can does not mean you should

They should have worked on technology that would keep them going the same speed safely, not slowing them down. From a racing standpoint, the cars are...

They should have worked on technology that would keep them going the same speed safely, not slowing them down. From a racing standpoint, the cars are inferior today. Racing is about going faster.

Racing is about the first person getting to the assigned distance in the shortest amount of time. If the car does not survive or you do not you lose.. If riders are injured or worse crashing at the speeds they are going you are going to run into issues. Physics eventually comes into play. Can suspension absorb the impacts at a certain speed?

If you want increased speed you are going to have fewer obstacles that are smaller to compensate. 

1
3strokemx
Posts
2553
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
US
3/3/2025 12:17pm

Was Kitchen's crash because his bike was too fast? 

2
1
Radical
Posts
2855
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA US
3/3/2025 5:15pm
3strokemx wrote:

Was Kitchen's crash because his bike was too fast? 

Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down a notch.

NotTheStig
Posts
84
Joined
3/26/2024
Location
Laramie, WY US
3/3/2025 9:42pm

Jeez with how hard he folded up like that it's lucky he's still walking

9
Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA US
3/3/2025 10:00pm

Shit...the human pretzel shot is painful to look at.      

2
Melicar
Posts
415
Joined
1/17/2013
Location
Sunny, CA US
3/3/2025 10:11pm

Ugh, that's enough internet for me... G'night fellas.

2
1
wrc777
Posts
3173
Joined
5/21/2020
Location
Greenwood, IN US
Fantasy
3/4/2025 4:52am
mb wrote:
He started looking off about 1/2 lap before the crash, slow to get his feet back on the pegs when exiting corners, etc. Was expecting him...

He started looking off about 1/2 lap before the crash, slow to get his feet back on the pegs when exiting corners, etc. Was expecting him to back it down, rough crash hope he has a quick recovery.

 

3strokemx wrote:
I noticed the same thing, from about 9:45 left on the clock you can see he's not cornering great and it looks like the shock is...

I noticed the same thing, from about 9:45 left on the clock you can see he's not cornering great and it looks like the shock is losing compression damping. 


I wonder if he was having a shock issue that contributed to the crash?

image 1265

A fading rear shock could definitely cause the bike to kick like that.

4
3strokemx
Posts
2553
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
US
3/4/2025 5:12am
Radical wrote:
Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down...

Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down a notch.

How do freestyle guys get hurt then? Their speed is much slower than SX but their injuries are usually worse.
If bike speed  is the issue, why did no 450 guys crash on the same jump?  Their bikes are much faster than Levi's 250

Obviously speed is a factor for injury, but it would be naive to think restricting the bikes would reduce injuries.....unless it was restricted to the point that they are riding 110's, essentially changing the sport so much that it's not the same.

1
Racerman967
Posts
678
Joined
1/1/2019
Location
Littleton, CO US
3/4/2025 8:21am
Radical wrote:
Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down...

Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down a notch.

3strokemx wrote:
How do freestyle guys get hurt then? Their speed is much slower than SX but their injuries are usually worse.If bike speed  is the issue, why...

How do freestyle guys get hurt then? Their speed is much slower than SX but their injuries are usually worse.
If bike speed  is the issue, why did no 450 guys crash on the same jump?  Their bikes are much faster than Levi's 250

Obviously speed is a factor for injury, but it would be naive to think restricting the bikes would reduce injuries.....unless it was restricted to the point that they are riding 110's, essentially changing the sport so much that it's not the same.

They are 30-40 feet in the air many times. Falling 3 stories will hurt when you land on flat. 

1
Radical
Posts
2855
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA US
3/4/2025 8:47am
Radical wrote:
Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down...

Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down a notch.

3strokemx wrote:
How do freestyle guys get hurt then? Their speed is much slower than SX but their injuries are usually worse.If bike speed  is the issue, why...

How do freestyle guys get hurt then? Their speed is much slower than SX but their injuries are usually worse.
If bike speed  is the issue, why did no 450 guys crash on the same jump?  Their bikes are much faster than Levi's 250

Obviously speed is a factor for injury, but it would be naive to think restricting the bikes would reduce injuries.....unless it was restricted to the point that they are riding 110's, essentially changing the sport so much that it's not the same.

In this case, the 450s are heavier, so they carry more momentum over bumps, craters, etc...

But, my thoughts are that part of the reason 450s didn't crash there is that the 450 riders are more experienced than the 250 riders, so they're SAFER on the more powerful bikes.

My entire point is that the faster you're riding, the less time you have to react to anything that goes awry, including how you get off the bike, plus you hit the ground harder.

I'm not suggesting that we make the bikes slow.  I'm stating that we need to manage the speed one way or another instead of letting it increase unabated for more than a half century.  Think about what would happen if we add another 10HP to the bikes, both 250 and 450?

rstaichi
Posts
266
Joined
1/4/2009
Location
Everett, WA US
3/4/2025 1:04pm
-MAVERICK- wrote:
LK Daytona 1LK Daytona 2LK Daytona 3LK Daytona 4LK Daytona 5.jpg?VersionId=o6g7dYyyy1LK Daytona 6LK Daytona 7LK Daytona 8.jpg?VersionId=E9 SKi61j9NQAC25RLK Daytona 9LK Daytona 10LK Daytona 11.jpg?VersionId=zj

That is so cool how guys are right place at right time. Those are some great pictures. Nice job who’s ever they are👍

2
Flatliner
Posts
4149
Joined
11/3/2009
Location
CA
3/4/2025 1:19pm
Radical wrote:
Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down...

Maybe.  But when you crash at a slower speed, you have more time to respond, and fewer bones are broken.  It's time to slow things down a notch.

I don't think you're going to find many that agree a 250f is too fast for pro racing.  It isn't.  Kitchen didn't crash because his bike was too fast,  he made a mistake.

Post a reply to: Levi

The Latest