How do we keep amateur racing amateur?

Braaaphole
Posts
803
Joined
8/21/2016
Location
Spring, TX, USA
1/29/2019 1:16pm
I've said for a long time that something needs to be done about it. Some of these kids have never stepped foot inside a traditional school. How can normal people compete with that? My kid has a goal/dream of racing Loretta's, and he's WAY off the pace right now. He can make it with a lot of work and dedication, but I know the real goal is to only make it there and race for 30-40th place.
I've talked with a lot of these kids and their parents, they are on full blown factory bikes. The top Team Green kids are on the same level bike as Adam Cianciarulo. I've talked to Mitch Peyton and Ryder D's mechanic, Pro Circuit will not build me the same engine for my kids bike as they do for Ryder and Jett. When I was trying to get some details on what was done to their engines, I was told flat out that it's not available. I'm not delusional in thinking my kid could compete with them if he was on the same bike, but what about the kids finishing 7th and 8th at Loretta's? You simply can't compete with that level of support for a kid who spends 30+ hours a week on a bike. That's not amateur racing anymore.
I hate to suggest making more classes, but the playing field should be leveled. Either put these factory riders in their own class, or cap what can be done to their bikes.
Take away some of the massive advantages that certain kids are getting and it will only help the sport. It would likely prevent so many people from pulling their kids out of school too. Sure some would still do it, but it would hopefully mitigate a lot of it.
Changes need to be made, period.
8
CozMan
Posts
182
Joined
7/15/2018
Location
Deep In The Heart of, TX, USA
1/29/2019 1:58pm
FWYT wrote:
On the team's side, I've wondered that myself- how they invest so heavily in a kid and the kid changes teams not long after turning pro...
On the team's side, I've wondered that myself- how they invest so heavily in a kid and the kid changes teams not long after turning pro. Does team that brought the kid up actually see a return on that money spent? Or are their accountants going "WTF?!"

It would be nice to see a more organic approach, but short of a pact between teams, I'm not sure how it gets done.
TriRacer27 wrote:
Why do people assume the ROI is dependent on the rider's pro career? Don't you think Ryder DiFrancesco sells KX80s when other kids see him winning...
Why do people assume the ROI is dependent on the rider's pro career? Don't you think Ryder DiFrancesco sells KX80s when other kids see him winning? These investments have largely paid for themselves by the time the kid turns pro. From there, they are hoping the relationship is strong enough to keep it going into the pro ranks.
my thought as well. These kids that are getting manufacturer support at young ages aren't because the OEMs think he'll become the next 250 Champ. It's so they can sell bikes to all his jackwagon friends and the people that watch at the races.
1
1/29/2019 2:17pm
Personally I like Derek's idea of a legit claiming rule. Basing it off a specific dollar amount per class instead of MSRP would make it much better. Getting around the MSRP rule would be easy- simply introduce a "Works Factory" model bike for an MSRP of $50,000 and then no one claims it at $150,000. Of course, the mfg would offer very steep discounts on that bike, bringing it in line with actual market value.... With a wink and a nod the claiming rule would be bypassed.
1
1
early
Posts
9901
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
1/29/2019 2:34pm
What if to race schoolboy classes you had to prove you have an 85% attendance record at a real school (public or parochial) ?
1
1

The Shop

deluxeman
Posts
787
Joined
6/27/2016
Location
Saranac, MI, USA
1/29/2019 2:58pm
Braaaphole wrote:
I've said for a long time that something needs to be done about it. Some of these kids have never stepped foot inside a traditional school...
I've said for a long time that something needs to be done about it. Some of these kids have never stepped foot inside a traditional school. How can normal people compete with that? My kid has a goal/dream of racing Loretta's, and he's WAY off the pace right now. He can make it with a lot of work and dedication, but I know the real goal is to only make it there and race for 30-40th place.
I've talked with a lot of these kids and their parents, they are on full blown factory bikes. The top Team Green kids are on the same level bike as Adam Cianciarulo. I've talked to Mitch Peyton and Ryder D's mechanic, Pro Circuit will not build me the same engine for my kids bike as they do for Ryder and Jett. When I was trying to get some details on what was done to their engines, I was told flat out that it's not available. I'm not delusional in thinking my kid could compete with them if he was on the same bike, but what about the kids finishing 7th and 8th at Loretta's? You simply can't compete with that level of support for a kid who spends 30+ hours a week on a bike. That's not amateur racing anymore.
I hate to suggest making more classes, but the playing field should be leveled. Either put these factory riders in their own class, or cap what can be done to their bikes.
Take away some of the massive advantages that certain kids are getting and it will only help the sport. It would likely prevent so many people from pulling their kids out of school too. Sure some would still do it, but it would hopefully mitigate a lot of it.
Changes need to be made, period.
I get what you are saying. But again this treatment/assistance is the same in any sport. These Teams like Pro Circuit, Troy Lee, Star Yamaha etc...... aren't looking for the top 10%. They are looking for the top 1%. This is no different from Alabama football or Duke basketball. They don't want a fast kid, they want the fastest kid, and to get that fastest kid they need to wine and dine them, give them fast bikes and lots of support. Get them on "A Program" and nurture them into the Pro ranks. How does Joe Blow compete with that ?

I understand the frustration this causes young kids and parents that are in the top 20% of their class. Maybe they are the fastest kid at their local races but just can't catch a break. Maybe Mom and Dad can't or won't go into huge debt to fund a full tilt race bike/s. These kids love the sport just as much as the Top Tier guy's but they are lacking in some area's, money, raw speed, conditioning......

So how do you compete with this. The short answer is you don't. You make it fun for your rider and let it be a hobby that they can do for the next 20-30 years, as a hobby. Or you fight tooth and nail to get the rules changed so that these unobtainium bikes are no longer allowed and let talent, desire and set up be the deciding factor. Keep costs in check and make it a fun sport and maybe the sport will grow a little.

Will any of this happen? I don't see it changing anytime soon. There are enough PC's TLD's Red Bull KTM's, Blu Cru, Team Greens ...that can afford to buy these riders early and bring them up through the ranks. The OEM's will always have the upper hand. They can spend tens of thousands on a bike to make it as perfect as it can be. How many families can do that on a budget? How many people have access to a track 24/7/365? Trainers, nutritionists, riding coaches, practice mechanics? the list goes on and on.

We live in a world of Dance Mom's and Mini Dad's that will stop at nothing so that little Jenny and Johnnie become Stars. This may be the hardest thing of all to overcome. How many really talented kids leave the sport because Dad is just too into it, and Jr. is just sick of getting screamed at every day?

You also have to remember that the cream always rises to the top. There are only 1% of the 1 per-centers. Those are the kids with the most talent, drive, determination, and desire to be great. Opportunity seems to always find it's way to these kids, whether they are from Podunk or Haynes City is doesn't matter, if your fast someone will notice.
5
twizzler
Posts
1005
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
1/29/2019 3:32pm
Braaaphole wrote:
I've said for a long time that something needs to be done about it. Some of these kids have never stepped foot inside a traditional school...
I've said for a long time that something needs to be done about it. Some of these kids have never stepped foot inside a traditional school. How can normal people compete with that? My kid has a goal/dream of racing Loretta's, and he's WAY off the pace right now. He can make it with a lot of work and dedication, but I know the real goal is to only make it there and race for 30-40th place.
I've talked with a lot of these kids and their parents, they are on full blown factory bikes. The top Team Green kids are on the same level bike as Adam Cianciarulo. I've talked to Mitch Peyton and Ryder D's mechanic, Pro Circuit will not build me the same engine for my kids bike as they do for Ryder and Jett. When I was trying to get some details on what was done to their engines, I was told flat out that it's not available. I'm not delusional in thinking my kid could compete with them if he was on the same bike, but what about the kids finishing 7th and 8th at Loretta's? You simply can't compete with that level of support for a kid who spends 30+ hours a week on a bike. That's not amateur racing anymore.
I hate to suggest making more classes, but the playing field should be leveled. Either put these factory riders in their own class, or cap what can be done to their bikes.
Take away some of the massive advantages that certain kids are getting and it will only help the sport. It would likely prevent so many people from pulling their kids out of school too. Sure some would still do it, but it would hopefully mitigate a lot of it.
Changes need to be made, period.
How about a rule that requires kids to be enrollled in a public or private "real" school. Home school not allowed/illegal. Wonder how that would go over?
2
1/29/2019 3:45pm
Limit number of classes these kids can enter as well. None of this 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 etc. So someone like Reynolds correct me if i’m wrong can enter 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 and also race his super mini in the schoolboy 1 class. So if multiple kids are doing this that’s extra races which means extra time at track which means more time off work more accomodations costs etc. I feel 2 classes max (like LL’s) this will limit the seat time advantage as well these supported kids get. Half these kids arent’ getting by on talent its only seat time advantage over the normal folks.
2
kage173
Posts
3064
Joined
11/27/2015
Location
USA
1/29/2019 3:50pm
deluxeman wrote:
I get what you are saying. But again this treatment/assistance is the same in any sport. These Teams like Pro Circuit, Troy Lee, Star Yamaha etc...
I get what you are saying. But again this treatment/assistance is the same in any sport. These Teams like Pro Circuit, Troy Lee, Star Yamaha etc...... aren't looking for the top 10%. They are looking for the top 1%. This is no different from Alabama football or Duke basketball. They don't want a fast kid, they want the fastest kid, and to get that fastest kid they need to wine and dine them, give them fast bikes and lots of support. Get them on "A Program" and nurture them into the Pro ranks. How does Joe Blow compete with that ?

I understand the frustration this causes young kids and parents that are in the top 20% of their class. Maybe they are the fastest kid at their local races but just can't catch a break. Maybe Mom and Dad can't or won't go into huge debt to fund a full tilt race bike/s. These kids love the sport just as much as the Top Tier guy's but they are lacking in some area's, money, raw speed, conditioning......

So how do you compete with this. The short answer is you don't. You make it fun for your rider and let it be a hobby that they can do for the next 20-30 years, as a hobby. Or you fight tooth and nail to get the rules changed so that these unobtainium bikes are no longer allowed and let talent, desire and set up be the deciding factor. Keep costs in check and make it a fun sport and maybe the sport will grow a little.

Will any of this happen? I don't see it changing anytime soon. There are enough PC's TLD's Red Bull KTM's, Blu Cru, Team Greens ...that can afford to buy these riders early and bring them up through the ranks. The OEM's will always have the upper hand. They can spend tens of thousands on a bike to make it as perfect as it can be. How many families can do that on a budget? How many people have access to a track 24/7/365? Trainers, nutritionists, riding coaches, practice mechanics? the list goes on and on.

We live in a world of Dance Mom's and Mini Dad's that will stop at nothing so that little Jenny and Johnnie become Stars. This may be the hardest thing of all to overcome. How many really talented kids leave the sport because Dad is just too into it, and Jr. is just sick of getting screamed at every day?

You also have to remember that the cream always rises to the top. There are only 1% of the 1 per-centers. Those are the kids with the most talent, drive, determination, and desire to be great. Opportunity seems to always find it's way to these kids, whether they are from Podunk or Haynes City is doesn't matter, if your fast someone will notice.
Duke pays it's players $0
Alabama pays it's players $0
1
drt410
Posts
2075
Joined
3/18/2017
Location
Boston, MA, USA
1/29/2019 4:18pm Edited Date/Time 1/29/2019 4:25pm
It's easy. First we have convert to a series rather than Loretta's. One former customer of ours I love to this day - is a kid...
It's easy.


First we have convert to a series rather than Loretta's. One former customer of ours I love to this day - is a kid names Chase Felong. Never was spectacular at loretta's - in fact I'd say he sucked (no offense chase!) But this past outdoor season, his rookie year, He banged on the door of some 20th places on a full privateer effort with bikes that this year weren't quite what he needs to get into the top 15 (there are about 20 factory 250 riders now) due to budget. He raced the same bike all season...with hardly any rebuilds etc. Not gonna cut it vs a factory 2 hour motor.

EMX is the perfect model of what we need and I think we need the following classes included
supermini
125cc schoolboy
250f schoolboy
250f "all star" - open to a or b riders - lets get rid of the B class and combine them at this level.



Secondly we implement and EMBRACE and WELCOME a claim rule. We already have it - but it's taboo. Claim a team bike from gieco or PC - and watch any chance you EVER had at racing pro go out the window

The claim rule should be across the sport at all large amatuer races and regionals (if we keep that system)
Ratchet up the level of this claim rule per class. So for example - 65cc-85cc claim rules 1.5 cost of msrp
supermini-b classes claim rules 2 times msrp

A classes 2.5 times msrp


This allows the A level riders to buy kit suspension (if you race seriously - buying 1 set of spare suspension - kit or not - makes a lot of sense when you rotate through 5 bikes a year so you just install your good stuff on each new bike and saves you money vs revalving 5 sets - but we need this cushion in the claim in case you loose that suspension)
and allows A riders to get pretty serious into engines but not insane. This also allows for wheels and bling. We do NOT want a true stock rule for our industry.

It increases parity - because if you think a guy is beating you because of his bike - you can buy it - and not be penalized for it. And best of all - it rids any and all parents of excuses. I HATE hearing how some kid is getting 20th because his bike isn't as good as the winner. Now you can pay up and prove that theory of yours and go win.

B riders can buy suspension or motor with some bling - but hard to buy BOTH.

supermini's are so brutal - you need 2 times msrp just to build one - if you don't think so now - you don't know superminis

And with a series at the same pro races - team involvement will go UP for these kids - but WAY farther back than just the top 3-5

You may get a team that lets you pit with them - and hauls your bikes to the races
You may get a little parts help as needed at each race
You will get a lot more eyeballs on you who are the people who need to watch....
And you will get more experience on truly rough, tough tracks. This is totally GONE in our sport at local and regional level races


I personally WANT the teams involved - but by limiting the bike difference (which is truly only a small part of their benefit) we can rid that excuse - and lower some of the costs that some parents think hold their kids back


We cant fix all our sport issues without fixing the biggest issue. It's not a PROFESSIONAL sport. It's just racing
It takes BIG money to race this sport - and it doesn't immediately pay BIG money.
So we we will never be able to eliminate the fact that those with money will have kids who maybe do better. Just how it is...
People need to come to grips with this. Unless your kid is just spectacular - which still happens, you have to accept it costs money to get to the top. Talent alone will no longer get it done.

Agree 100% on the claim rule and modeling more like emx. Another thing is if you start to eliminate the insane factory superminis etc you can at least make the sport more accessible for non rich or well enough off families to be the only ones truly competitive. Think about how amazing James and Malcolm have been for our sport, it kinda sux that once malcolm goes the “diversity” is gone with black Americans and then its about 2-3 hispanic riders out there and thats it. Why did they not open the floodgates? Because almost nobody can afford to keep up with this sport regardless of who you are or where your from.

The sport will be much better off with a diverse group of riders.. and fans. You always need the next gen of fans too to keep the sport around. Im excited to see Jo Shimoda go pro the Japanese kid who won MEC and he could pave the way for more asian fans/riders which is an enormous anount of people which could be huuuuge for the sport. He brings a style of racing that you dont see here or in the GPs and I think its great for the sport, I see big things from him. I think its a bigger issue than just keeping it competitive and we need to keep the sport accessible as well. Less and less people are riding these days opting for video games or school sports so our future depends on the next generation of riders and fans. Opening the sport up to people who may never even have known what it was but have someone to root for is the best thing that could happen.
1
1/29/2019 4:41pm
Limit number of classes these kids can enter as well. None of this 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 etc. So someone like Reynolds correct...
Limit number of classes these kids can enter as well. None of this 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 etc. So someone like Reynolds correct me if i’m wrong can enter 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 and also race his super mini in the schoolboy 1 class. So if multiple kids are doing this that’s extra races which means extra time at track which means more time off work more accomodations costs etc. I feel 2 classes max (like LL’s) this will limit the seat time advantage as well these supported kids get. Half these kids arent’ getting by on talent its only seat time advantage over the normal folks.
You can only accept 2 classes at lorettas

But good idea - good enough it's adopted...
1/29/2019 4:46pm
kage173 wrote:
Duke pays it's players $0
Alabama pays it's players $0
LOL.
kage173
Posts
3064
Joined
11/27/2015
Location
USA
1/29/2019 4:49pm Edited Date/Time 1/29/2019 4:50pm
yeah...you believe that and i'll believe in santa clause.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o390D05AqeE
Yeah, it's under the table. This kind of thing is investigated by the FBI now and has huge repercussions. It's not the open status quo.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/college-basketballs-f…


And by the way, those guys are 18-22 year olds who have to be in school. Not 13 year olds getting pulled out of school.
1
1/29/2019 4:57pm
Braaaphole wrote:
I've said for a long time that something needs to be done about it. Some of these kids have never stepped foot inside a traditional school...
I've said for a long time that something needs to be done about it. Some of these kids have never stepped foot inside a traditional school. How can normal people compete with that? My kid has a goal/dream of racing Loretta's, and he's WAY off the pace right now. He can make it with a lot of work and dedication, but I know the real goal is to only make it there and race for 30-40th place.
I've talked with a lot of these kids and their parents, they are on full blown factory bikes. The top Team Green kids are on the same level bike as Adam Cianciarulo. I've talked to Mitch Peyton and Ryder D's mechanic, Pro Circuit will not build me the same engine for my kids bike as they do for Ryder and Jett. When I was trying to get some details on what was done to their engines, I was told flat out that it's not available. I'm not delusional in thinking my kid could compete with them if he was on the same bike, but what about the kids finishing 7th and 8th at Loretta's? You simply can't compete with that level of support for a kid who spends 30+ hours a week on a bike. That's not amateur racing anymore.
I hate to suggest making more classes, but the playing field should be leveled. Either put these factory riders in their own class, or cap what can be done to their bikes.
Take away some of the massive advantages that certain kids are getting and it will only help the sport. It would likely prevent so many people from pulling their kids out of school too. Sure some would still do it, but it would hopefully mitigate a lot of it.
Changes need to be made, period.
I disagree with all of this fundamentally but agree with where you are coming from.
I DO agree you can't buy what PC races - although you CAN BUY what won loretta's in 2017 in supermini 1 and supermini 2 straight from me
I built that engine and it will likely be one of the last fully private efforts to win for years to come. Bikes paid for - not given, fully private program with zero support outside of parents and graphics/gear.

This year for example - the big players for KTM all had the new 105 kit - and the "privateers" couldn't even buy it yet from KTM. That's bullshit.

But fundamentally - the factory kids and avg joe kids should race the same classes. The dream of loretta's is NOT to just MAKE it. It's to MAKE it against the entire USA talent pool. That is what makes loretta's special.

There are only ever 4-5 factory supported riders in any class. We often work with customers from 5-10 who dont get a damn thing
So that leaves 38 spots for the rest of us. Don't believe all you hear about people saying they get support - most are full of it.

One of my customers won 450B in 2017 and he STILL doesn't get anything.
He was top finishing ktm/husky rider at Mini o's in pro in 2018...full private effort and has ZERO talks right now from any team despite beating all their riders.

We want the races to find the best riders - put those riders in contact with the teams - and get them a paying ride at pro.
Sadly its' not working out as intended as many of the great riders are NOT getting a team gig and many of the team kids are NOT panning out to be better at pro. I say it to my guys - if you don't already have a ride by big bikes - good luck! The teams have already picked some kids - and have MORE kids in the pipeline - so you'd have to show without a shadow of a doubt that your better than their pick all year... not easy.

That's why a series would be better giving more diversity of tracks and tougher tracks closer to what the pros race and not just 1 time a year and allow kids who are CONSISTENTLY up front to get attention.

we also need a legit super cross grooming circuit - a minor leagues.

Marchbanks is an example - If he can enter outdoors healthy - he will be fast.
But SX is kicking his ass....






4
1/29/2019 5:01pm
Just a reminder to all, there was that kid back in the days, poor family but great talent. He got picked up by Suzuki and shortly after Red Bull and Fox and made a greay career out of it. His name is Ken Roczen, without the financial help of the former Suzuki Germany boss and later his manager that great talent never had a chance to make a career just because there wasn’t enough money to compete on the highest amateur level in Europe.
It is very important for the sport to have the paid amateur racers, it would just be great to educate the parents more and to make them realice a bit earlier that they not gonna make it and they need a backup plan.
1
1
swtwtwtw
Posts
1287
Joined
4/16/2008
Location
Apple Valley, CA, USA
1/29/2019 5:51pm
Eliminate the amateur nationals, regionals, and LL Championship. Kids race locally or just wherever.
1
1/30/2019 12:05am
Limit number of classes these kids can enter as well. None of this 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 etc. So someone like Reynolds correct...
Limit number of classes these kids can enter as well. None of this 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 etc. So someone like Reynolds correct me if i’m wrong can enter 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 and also race his super mini in the schoolboy 1 class. So if multiple kids are doing this that’s extra races which means extra time at track which means more time off work more accomodations costs etc. I feel 2 classes max (like LL’s) this will limit the seat time advantage as well these supported kids get. Half these kids arent’ getting by on talent its only seat time advantage over the normal folks.
You can only accept 2 classes at lorettas

But good idea - good enough it's adopted...
Sorry Derek
I meant two classes max at all open meetings.
I don't mind whatever ya can enter for normal 1 day club meetings as thats more money for the club but these "Opens" need to be capped.
I know an engine builder over there (USA) who has built engines for a couple of supermini riders who placed 1st at LL's i wont divulge the cost but it was mind blowing what was poured into the bikes of these riders
Cortami79
Posts
1951
Joined
1/11/2016
Location
NL
1/30/2019 1:17am
twizzler wrote:
For you European guys, is the EU amateur racing growing as in more interest higher race turnouts year over year? In USA local amateur racing is...
For you European guys, is the EU amateur racing growing as in more interest higher race turnouts year over year?
In USA local amateur racing is way down. Sure there are a few amateur national races that gets everyone's attention; LL's, Mammoth, etc. and those races are where the amateur pros go to chase and satisfy their sponsors. To me that is a monopoly by basically a couple promoter groups. Basically one promoter owns our US amateur series and that one series is what gets the focus. But I also think it hurts local state racing. Not sure what to recommend to fix it. That would be one big chore.
In my eyes it is growing. But still it has some huge costs.

Every country has his good riders and championships. So the chances to get support from a good team is there. But i have to say that many riders are paying their way through these amateur years with personal sponsors. But definitely not 200k a year.

So, let's say you are a good 85cc rider from the Netherlands. Most riders that have the talent and determination ride the Dutch Championship races. You have 2 different associations to choose from. KNMV (always has the biggest talents) and MON (more regional south of the country). A good 85cc rider rides KNMV (+ Dutch Masters) and combines this with a few ADAC races. Then you have around 4 European Championship qualifying races. These qualifiers get you to the final in Czech Republic. Most of these 85cc rides are not paid for by teams, unless you are a very big talent like Kay de Wolf. And even he had heavy investments from his familiy and personal sponsors in his first few years.

Here is a video of a Dutch Championship race (not a Dutch Masters). The level is really high as these guys were in the top 5 during the EMX final as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3dMWd1Hlk4

The good thing is that you don't have supermini's here. The 85cc class are mostly KTM's though. They are simply the fastest bikes.

Once you go to EMX125 and you are not on the top 5% of biggest talents, there is a big chance that you need around 30k-60k a year to buy yourself into a team. Most of these guys do this because a team arranges your bikes, hospitality, gear, helmets etc. With help from big sponsors (mostly industrial or construction companies) that believe in you, you can do this combined with Dutch Masters and ADAC races. Some riders opt to go to the French Championship as they have a very solid program as well.

Now, in EMX250 is where it really starts in my opinion. Just watch the results from 5 years ago from EMX125 and watch where some of these top riders are now. In EMX125 you can have some decent results because you have a better bike, but in EMX250 you can really see the difference in talent.

I have seen some ex-GP riders getting top 5 qualifying times and results on a stock KTM. (I.e. Kevin Wouts) in the EMX250 class. The problem is however, that guys like him need that extra 2-3 seconds to get decent results in the GP's. And that is the biggest step some of them can't make unfortunately. However, if you have the talent and you're in the right age. The possibility is there that a factory team picks you up. The turnout on these EMX races is huge, as most riders choose to ride a select few of them that are in the right distance. So let's say you are a Dutch rider and you dont want all these travel expenses, I would choose GB, Italy, France, Germany and Belgium. This is a pretty decent thing for a privateer effort. It is expensive yes, but better then paying 60-100k a year to get into a team (250 rides are more expensive).

Herlings for example had Suzuki support in his 65,85cc days along with big national/regional sponsors withing the industry. Coldenhoff had the same, but he had a rough few years to get used to the speed of GP's (there was no EMX back then during the GP weekends) and really is where he is right now due to the support of personal sponsors and investments from his family that paid for him to keep him in the GP's.






rocrac
Posts
2454
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
1/30/2019 4:02am
This has been going on for a long time. Does anyone remember Adam C signing a 5 year deal with pro circuit as 85cc rider? Factory bikes shouldn't be allowed in the amateurs period.
1
steveada
Posts
396
Joined
5/6/2011
Location
Evans, GA, USA
1/30/2019 7:01am
1. Claiming rule: the problem with the current claiming rule is not necessarily that it is taboo, it is that more than one person can claim a bike. make it so the first person to claim a bike gets it. That way the friends or other teams with a huge investment in their bikes can't join the claim, get the bike, and give it back to the original owner, effectively making the rule worthless.

2. Limiting seat time is a bad idea. My kids are grown, but when we went to a weekend race, running more than 2 classes was pretty common. You already have made the commitment in time and money to be there, so you might as well make it worthwhile. Why take time off, travel 500 miles, pay for lodging, food etc to pretty much sit around all day to get a couple of 10 minute motos in.
dl117
Posts
1548
Joined
2/8/2007
Location
Cambridge, MN, USA
1/30/2019 7:31am
HonDawg17 wrote:
I'm sorry didn't know the sport of Motocross was "your" business. I agree with you the teams are using spitting images of the factory bikes for...
I'm sorry didn't know the sport of Motocross was "your" business. I agree with you the teams are using spitting images of the factory bikes for these amateurs, which is very wrong. But as far as I know no one is regulating those expenditures at all either for the teams and/or average Joe racer. So the rule is a joke. Half of that crap you don't need. In reality: You don't need extra wheels, those aren't making anything faster. Don't need graphics. All you need is a bike, better handlebars, engine components and suspension. That's it. No one will agree with me but its true. All the cosmetic stuff is BS and overpriced BLING-A-DING-DING.

With that said, your proposal fixes absolutely nothing if the rule in place isn't being enforced. You need to make racing affordable and modifications affordable. Not make it so you HAVE to spend $7000 on a Supermini after you buy it. Your rule should be a MATCH PRICE OF MSRP at most. These bikes are already retarded expensive from 10 years ago. Pretty soon the sport will have less and less weekend warriors except the 2 stroke gang because they're easily rebuilt and cheap as hell. And the tech on those hasn't changed in 20+ years.

Best thing they can do is go back to stock classes. AND stock suspension should be included with that.
There was a hell of a lot of very fast guys you raced with that bikes looked clapped out, but were good in the places that needed to be..
hard2kill
Posts
374
Joined
9/8/2010
Location
Flag Pond, TN, USA
1/30/2019 7:44am
MX needs a complete restructure as to how riders come up through the ranks. I like the approach that cycling has with a U23 feild it gives the riders time to develop and build strength,further education, and learn the system before being thrown to the lions.
FWYT
Posts
3553
Joined
5/25/2014
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
1/30/2019 8:05am
FWYT wrote:
On the team's side, I've wondered that myself- how they invest so heavily in a kid and the kid changes teams not long after turning pro...
On the team's side, I've wondered that myself- how they invest so heavily in a kid and the kid changes teams not long after turning pro. Does team that brought the kid up actually see a return on that money spent? Or are their accountants going "WTF?!"

It would be nice to see a more organic approach, but short of a pact between teams, I'm not sure how it gets done.
TriRacer27 wrote:
Why do people assume the ROI is dependent on the rider's pro career? Don't you think Ryder DiFrancesco sells KX80s when other kids see him winning...
Why do people assume the ROI is dependent on the rider's pro career? Don't you think Ryder DiFrancesco sells KX80s when other kids see him winning? These investments have largely paid for themselves by the time the kid turns pro. From there, they are hoping the relationship is strong enough to keep it going into the pro ranks.
CozMan wrote:
my thought as well. These kids that are getting manufacturer support at young ages aren't because the OEMs think he'll become the next 250 Champ. It's...
my thought as well. These kids that are getting manufacturer support at young ages aren't because the OEMs think he'll become the next 250 Champ. It's so they can sell bikes to all his jackwagon friends and the people that watch at the races.
Yeah, you're right. Guess I didn't really think of that.

Holy shit . . . I'm flamgasted at the dollar amounts thrown out in this thread. Fugging insane. So glad I grew up racing an XR75 around tires in a dirt lot just for fun. 40 years later and it's still just as fun.
deluxeman
Posts
787
Joined
6/27/2016
Location
Saranac, MI, USA
1/30/2019 8:23am
kage173 wrote:
Duke pays it's players $0
Alabama pays it's players $0
They get a free top Tier education if they choose to take advantage of it. They do get some spending money from the University, that is regulated by the NCAA. Free room and board, free food, free health care.

So in actual $ paid directly to the players the amount is minimal. The amount invested in these players is huge.

My stepson trained with former MSU point guard Travis Walton at MSU, he also trained many MSU players at that time. I got to know some of them and Travis would tell us about his college days. These universities take VERY good care of their top players. They get huge amounts of swag, spending money, local businessmen take pretty good care of these guys, give them token jobs and lots of other perks. They have travelling tutors, custom suits that they wear to away games. They are treated like royalty.

There was a movement to actually pay college players because they make these universities so much money. Have not heard much about this lately.

The reason they go to these schools is to play in the pro ranks somewhere. Because of the NCAA one year rule they have to attend college for at least one year. When the NCAA finally changes the rules it looks like they will let high schoolers go directly to the NBA or to an NCAA university for two years minimum.

The only difference between this and Amateur racing is the NCAA controls what colleges can and can't do. They also set the rules for the games and everyone has to play by the same rules.

1/30/2019 8:34am
We need a strong minor league that pays strong purses
Full series coupled with the "amatuer" classes
We need to push these families to STOP chasing amateur titles - the reason to stay is practically zero yet they do.

Personally I believe the payouts should start in 125 schoolboy.

If you think about it - our sport HAD that in the older days with local racing. You went pro at 15 on 125s and chased local and regional money - then when the closest outdoor or sx came around you went and tested your skills there.

I mean the california local racing scene used to be INSANE - didn't they have payouts down in 85cc?

the issue is local racing dropped off entirely - so we now need to replace that with an official series....
yak651
Posts
8722
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI, USA
Fantasy
1/30/2019 8:34am
Limit number of classes these kids can enter as well. None of this 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 etc. So someone like Reynolds correct...
Limit number of classes these kids can enter as well. None of this 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 etc. So someone like Reynolds correct me if i’m wrong can enter 85mod, 85 limited, super mini 1& 2 and also race his super mini in the schoolboy 1 class. So if multiple kids are doing this that’s extra races which means extra time at track which means more time off work more accomodations costs etc. I feel 2 classes max (like LL’s) this will limit the seat time advantage as well these supported kids get. Half these kids arent’ getting by on talent its only seat time advantage over the normal folks.
Yep, why all these classes? To make more money for promoter (MX Sports) and for the kid to get more track time (I get that). Can we increase track time if we get rid of all these extra classes? Go to 12+1 lap for c, 15+1 for B, 20+1 for A. Not sure what to do for mini classes, maybe 15 minutes?

Also why have supermini class if no MFG makes one? Again just for promoter money....haven't heard one parent that likes the class, stupid mini most call them...
deluxeman
Posts
787
Joined
6/27/2016
Location
Saranac, MI, USA
1/30/2019 8:36am
kage173 wrote:
Duke pays it's players $0
Alabama pays it's players $0
yeah...you believe that and i'll believe in santa clause.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o390D05AqeE
That is a great clip, it touches on some of what plagues amateur racing as well. Too much emphasis on sports and not enough on an education.
Tarz483
Posts
6344
Joined
2/25/2009
Location
Mankato, MN, USA
1/30/2019 8:49am
rocrac wrote:
This has been going on for a long time. Does anyone remember Adam C signing a 5 year deal with pro circuit as 85cc rider? Factory...
This has been going on for a long time. Does anyone remember Adam C signing a 5 year deal with pro circuit as 85cc rider? Factory bikes shouldn't be allowed in the amateurs period.
I Agree, and u pure Stock class is needed imo
1
1/30/2019 9:19pm
this is my business day in and day out The amount of money being spent right now FAR exceeds what I've outlined The factory teams who...
this is my business day in and day out


The amount of money being spent right now FAR exceeds what I've outlined
The factory teams who hire the amatuer riders - what this topic was started on - are racing damn near their full blown bikes they race at the pros.

The value of that bike - if a privateer effort wanted to even get CLOSE would approach 40-50k minimum

A supermini will cost you 12k to build a bike that can compete at lorettas
New ktm is 6300ish OTD for many people
Wheels are 1k for good brand
A decent engine package will set you back 3k

A revalve will set you back 1k. Any extra bs you put on the bike - be it graphics, bling, levers, better rear brake (KTM problem) and boom - your at 12k

Considering the fact that not only are most parents do this or MORE - but that they have 2-3 bikes of this caliber OR MORE - I think the rule is very fair.

The sad fact is - the rule ALREADy exists like I've outlined. The problem is the taboo of actually claiming a factory bike.
If A kid in 8th claims jet reynolds supermini - or seth hammaker's 250f - he is all but assured to never be given a ride in this industry by any factory effort. That's just how it is right now - and not how it SHOULD be.

Go look at aiden tjero's effort last few years. The easily spend 200k a year on racing.

The 8th place kid who claims a factory bike is not getting a factory ride anyway. 8th place kids do not get factory rides.

We made the claiming rule easier to take advantage of in the AMA rulebook last year with zero pushback from the factories. I promise you all of the factories would love to slash the price of competing, but it only takes one guy to spend the big bucks and all of the others are forced to follow to be competitive.

The rule in the book already says,1.3 times retail and 1.5 times retail for a Supermini so the mechanism is already there.
1/30/2019 9:31pm
steveada wrote:
1. Claiming rule: the problem with the current claiming rule is not necessarily that it is taboo, it is that more than one person can claim...
1. Claiming rule: the problem with the current claiming rule is not necessarily that it is taboo, it is that more than one person can claim a bike. make it so the first person to claim a bike gets it. That way the friends or other teams with a huge investment in their bikes can't join the claim, get the bike, and give it back to the original owner, effectively making the rule worthless.

2. Limiting seat time is a bad idea. My kids are grown, but when we went to a weekend race, running more than 2 classes was pretty common. You already have made the commitment in time and money to be there, so you might as well make it worthwhile. Why take time off, travel 500 miles, pay for lodging, food etc to pretty much sit around all day to get a couple of 10 minute motos in.
New rule for 2018 said that anyone caught circumventing the claiming rule was subject to a year suspension. Kind of hard to prove, but most would not take the chance while facing a year suspension.

Post a reply to: How do we keep amateur racing amateur?

The Latest