Posts
4179
Joined
3/6/2010
Location
BE
Running a Japanese Factory team is mostly a big hassle because if you have a solution for a problem they come up with 5 different ways to fix the problem and then they are saying: "OK try your way". That is for example why Clément Desalle his Honda never had false neutrals and Marc De Reuver and Kevin Strijbos where both out for almost a full season due to false neutrals. They couldn't rely on there bike... And after four months or something they came to LS Honda to ask what they did to CD25 his bike...
Same with KEMEA and Standing Construct both were on Yamaha but KEMEA was more like the real factory team riding with Rinaldi and GTYR parts and Standing Construct had the freedom to do all in house. They had a problem that the bike sometimes switched off, just out of nothing. Almost two GP's the factory wanted to fix it by their own and they ended up with Brent Van Doninck crashing at a local Belgian race where they tested a new "fix". Then Standing Construct shared the solution...
But to come to the conclusion: Is that why Star is now winning a championship and the Yamaha Factory team couldn't. Or was there more to it?
Same with KEMEA and Standing Construct both were on Yamaha but KEMEA was more like the real factory team riding with Rinaldi and GTYR parts and Standing Construct had the freedom to do all in house. They had a problem that the bike sometimes switched off, just out of nothing. Almost two GP's the factory wanted to fix it by their own and they ended up with Brent Van Doninck crashing at a local Belgian race where they tested a new "fix". Then Standing Construct shared the solution...
But to come to the conclusion: Is that why Star is now winning a championship and the Yamaha Factory team couldn't. Or was there more to it?
Makes you wonder what Bam, Coop and any of the other recent factory blue riders might have done if corporate had their head out their ass.
The Shop
Yamaha is notorious for keeping the factory team close to what the 'factory wants' and
the factory wants certain parts (such as gytr) or will only allow certain mods ( as they want to showcase their production stuff being the 'best') and these parts dont equate to the best bike for a rider or a better bike overall.
based on Star vs Factory, they've built a better bike overall including shaving a lot of weight which on a factory bike is insane in my mind. Honda/ktm would be ashamed if they were leaving something on the table in terms of bike performance especially something like weight which is huge on a 450.
I believe he mentioned that Star let them start from scratch on stock bike and make a bike perfect for them.
Props to both the team and Dylan! That bike looks amazing under him.
Bobby Regan wants to WIN and will spend and do whatever it takes to make it happen for his riders.
Factory yammerhammer = too big, too many meetings, not remotely in the trenches, takes far too long to respond to rider changes, didn't even seem to care what their high paid factory guys wanted = didn't really care about winning
That scenario sounds like what most expected Joe Gibbs Racing to be, especially after all the hype involved around their unlimited finances & rumored ability to create parts and do whatever they wanted to a particular bike.
Pit Row
Star engines had power but in interviews with Dylan on Pulp recently he started running a softer engine as the season progressed.
The chassis has been noted to not really agree with more power than what stock puts out
The interview with him was great listen, he touched (vaguely) on some of the modifications they made to the chassis and their suspension setups.
I mean, isn’t that one of the main perks of being on a factory team or am I just blissfully ignorant?
A different approach for sure but it seems to be working for them just fine!
Post a reply to: The differences between Star & Factory.