Grow the sport? Fix local tracks and racing.

30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/1/2026 11:50am
John813 wrote:
I'm not sure about 30 minute motos, for everyone as in my opinion wrecks happen when riders are fatigued. More forgiving jumps or not. 15-20 minute...

I'm not sure about 30 minute motos, for everyone as in my opinion wrecks happen when riders are fatigued. More forgiving jumps or not. 15-20 minute motos for amateur/weekend riders sounds good enough. Maybe for the vet expert level classes. 

I think a large part that is hurting the growth of the sport is the cost in general. Want proper boots, helmets, pads etc, easily 1k+.

New dirtbikes, even waiting a year for a leftover will run you at or under 10k for most full sized bikes. Hell, Husky is charging 6k msrp for a 65 these days. Of course you can get a KX or YZ for cheaper MSRP, but I've seen dealers add $1,800 in fees and taxes for a YZ65. Dealer fee, freight, assembly, docs etc. 

Of course can save some going used, but never know what surprises you'll have. 

I think you don't even need to race to grow the sport/viewership. You just need the next generation riding bikes. But the amount of tracks in Florida, for example, that have closed in the past 15 years is quite a bit, for how big Florida is at in general for motocross. It can be 1-2+ hours easily for the local track, and if it's too crowded or crazy jumps, then 2-3 hours for the next track. 

 

Years back I had a buddy who had 30 acres that we built a track on 1-2 acres. Took months to QA/QC get the berms, jumps all at a decent level. I get why some tracks charge what they do nowadays between insurance and operating, but at $40-50 a head just for practice laps it adds up when you're getting kids involved too. 

 

3strokemx wrote:
How do you know wrecks are more common when riders are fatigued?  Are there long motos somewhere that you are using as your point of comparision?The...

How do you know wrecks are more common when riders are fatigued?  Are there long motos somewhere that you are using as your point of comparision?

The GNCC guys should all be dead after their 180 minute races?

Wait now you’re on my team?! Rabbit season! Duck season! 

3
3strokemx
Posts
2635
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
US
6/1/2026 12:00pm
30minmotos wrote:

Wait now you’re on my team?! Rabbit season! Duck season! 

I was never against you, just wanted to help provide better appreciation for the nuanced relationship between the risks of Obstacles vs risks of Speed.  

3
RDnutz
Posts
673
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO US
6/1/2026 12:51pm
Rickyisms wrote:
FWIW I did the math about a year ago on the MSRP of a brand new YZ125 vs the early 80s and it has basically stayed...

FWIW I did the math about a year ago on the MSRP of a brand new YZ125 vs the early 80s and it has basically stayed consistent with inflation. But for some reason, everyone wants a CRF450 WE or similar and then wants to bitch about how expensive the sport is.

looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:

1973 (1st year) CR250M Honda Elsinore MSRP $1195.00; US inflation rate 8.71%

2027 CRF Honda 250 (not WE) MSRP $8390.00; US inflation rate 2025 (last full year recorded) 2.6%

someone with more math/stats/analytical skills than me can probably extrapolate relative value over time, etc. 😉

1
1
6/1/2026 1:12pm
RDnutz wrote:
looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:1973 (1st year)...

looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:

1973 (1st year) CR250M Honda Elsinore MSRP $1195.00; US inflation rate 8.71%

2027 CRF Honda 250 (not WE) MSRP $8390.00; US inflation rate 2025 (last full year recorded) 2.6%

someone with more math/stats/analytical skills than me can probably extrapolate relative value over time, etc. 😉

Screenshot 2026-06-01 at 16-11-49 CPI Inflation Calculator.png?VersionId=UaJBpxbCp.NNmsshf6gs9wVq
2
2

The Shop

JeremySmith
Posts
7
Joined
2/21/2016
Location
Port Isabel, TX US
6/1/2026 1:40pm

The AMA needs to do something to help out with places to ride. All they need to do is organize people and I think most people are willing to help the local tracks but there is no one out there as a real leader for the dirt bike community. The membership should come with some voting rights and your own influence over AMA funds. There could be local chapters of AMA that can just get organized for track owners, track workers and funds. In the whole dirt bike community of people who actually ride very few people race and even fewer people race ama events. I I knew my money was actually going towards real riding areas I would be heavily involved.  

 

There could be local presidents of each district and bylaws and voting rights much like a labor union. 

1
1
Wo Phat
Posts
99
Joined
3/11/2023
Location
Montgomery, AL US
6/1/2026 1:49pm
28hall wrote:
Anywhere I race its always the vets complaining the races are too long when it has already been cut to 4 laps. I will do pro...

Anywhere I race its always the vets complaining the races are too long when it has already been cut to 4 laps. I will do pro open and vet to get more track time but then I get harassed by officials about flag marshalling as I have two kids racing as well. I'm not sure what the answer is. Outrageous entry fees for big events and not enough participants at club level races has really ruined the fun and has me questioning the future.

Wo Phat wrote:

you ever stop to think that it's the vets who pay the bills? 

Rickyisms wrote:

Everyone else just gets to race for free then?

who said that besides you?.....there was a post that was sort of disparaging vets and all i pointed out was those are the guys track owners should be listening to because they are the ones spending the money. without them tracks disappear. now that you may have a better understanding of what i posted, don't you think your reply was stupid?

2
6/1/2026 1:55pm
30minmotos wrote:
My buddy made a great point about the tracks and insurance issues too. If the tracks were more forgiving and built for the 99% instead of...

My buddy made a great point about the tracks and insurance issues too. If the tracks were more forgiving and built for the 99% instead of the 1%, the injuries would be so much less severe and much less frequent: if kids weren’t cracking their skulls open and breaking femurs on a weekly basis insurance wouldn’t be the issue it is.

3strokemx wrote:

Is that what happened in  the Eks Brand Rich Taylor lawsuit?

30minmotos wrote:
No reason for a berm tall enough and steep enough with a cliff on the back side. Yes some thought should be put into design to...

No reason for a berm tall enough and steep enough with a cliff on the back side. Yes some thought should be put into design to be safe and forgiving.  


I don’t think he should have sued but if the tracks built shit with half a brain and with safety in mind a lot of this gets reduced and prevented.


You have to make it safe. You have to taper landings. You have to taper track edges. You have to taper back sides of berms: you can’t have trees and branches against the lanes.


Jumps shouldn’t be impending doom if you misjudge by 5% at an amateur track.


Was there a jump before that berm? Why are there jumps in every lane? Why so many back to back? If you get a little loose off the first, now you send it out of control off the second instead of having space to get it together.



This is motocross for amateurs… not supercross for hardened pros.

I'm generally in agreement that tracks focused on amateurs should be relatively forgiving. That said, there is nothing wrong with a track owner building a full blown pro track with steep jumps and tight rhythms. It's your responsibility as a rider and/or parent to determine if a track is safe enough for you/your rider. If you aren't comfortable with the track design then don't ride. Don't bust your ass and then go out and sue the track because you crashed on a track you knew had obstacles you deemed dangerous. Absent gross negligence (parking a dozer on the landing of a jump) there shouldn't' be lawsuits against track owners for injuries suffered while riding. Motocross is one of, if not the most, dangerous sport out there, injuries will happen, and 99% of the time that injury is on the rider.  

2
3
30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/1/2026 1:56pm
3strokemx wrote:

Is that what happened in  the Eks Brand Rich Taylor lawsuit?

30minmotos wrote:
No reason for a berm tall enough and steep enough with a cliff on the back side. Yes some thought should be put into design to...

No reason for a berm tall enough and steep enough with a cliff on the back side. Yes some thought should be put into design to be safe and forgiving.  


I don’t think he should have sued but if the tracks built shit with half a brain and with safety in mind a lot of this gets reduced and prevented.


You have to make it safe. You have to taper landings. You have to taper track edges. You have to taper back sides of berms: you can’t have trees and branches against the lanes.


Jumps shouldn’t be impending doom if you misjudge by 5% at an amateur track.


Was there a jump before that berm? Why are there jumps in every lane? Why so many back to back? If you get a little loose off the first, now you send it out of control off the second instead of having space to get it together.



This is motocross for amateurs… not supercross for hardened pros.

Smuffers wrote:
I'm generally in agreement that tracks focused on amateurs should be relatively forgiving. That said, there is nothing wrong with a track owner building a full...

I'm generally in agreement that tracks focused on amateurs should be relatively forgiving. That said, there is nothing wrong with a track owner building a full blown pro track with steep jumps and tight rhythms. It's your responsibility as a rider and/or parent to determine if a track is safe enough for you/your rider. If you aren't comfortable with the track design then don't ride. Don't bust your ass and then go out and sue the track because you crashed on a track you knew had obstacles you deemed dangerous. Absent gross negligence (parking a dozer on the landing of a jump) there shouldn't' be lawsuits against track owners for injuries suffered while riding. Motocross is one of, if not the most, dangerous sport out there, injuries will happen, and 99% of the time that injury is on the rider.  

Of course it’s a free country but we’re discussing how to improve local riding and racing and get more people riding. Building a pro level track than punishes and quite literally breaks the riders isn’t a great way to get repeat customers.

3
2
6/1/2026 2:00pm
30minmotos wrote:
No reason for a berm tall enough and steep enough with a cliff on the back side. Yes some thought should be put into design to...

No reason for a berm tall enough and steep enough with a cliff on the back side. Yes some thought should be put into design to be safe and forgiving.  


I don’t think he should have sued but if the tracks built shit with half a brain and with safety in mind a lot of this gets reduced and prevented.


You have to make it safe. You have to taper landings. You have to taper track edges. You have to taper back sides of berms: you can’t have trees and branches against the lanes.


Jumps shouldn’t be impending doom if you misjudge by 5% at an amateur track.


Was there a jump before that berm? Why are there jumps in every lane? Why so many back to back? If you get a little loose off the first, now you send it out of control off the second instead of having space to get it together.



This is motocross for amateurs… not supercross for hardened pros.

Smuffers wrote:
I'm generally in agreement that tracks focused on amateurs should be relatively forgiving. That said, there is nothing wrong with a track owner building a full...

I'm generally in agreement that tracks focused on amateurs should be relatively forgiving. That said, there is nothing wrong with a track owner building a full blown pro track with steep jumps and tight rhythms. It's your responsibility as a rider and/or parent to determine if a track is safe enough for you/your rider. If you aren't comfortable with the track design then don't ride. Don't bust your ass and then go out and sue the track because you crashed on a track you knew had obstacles you deemed dangerous. Absent gross negligence (parking a dozer on the landing of a jump) there shouldn't' be lawsuits against track owners for injuries suffered while riding. Motocross is one of, if not the most, dangerous sport out there, injuries will happen, and 99% of the time that injury is on the rider.  

30minmotos wrote:
Of course it’s a free country but we’re discussing how to improve local riding and racing and get more people riding. Building a pro level track...

Of course it’s a free country but we’re discussing how to improve local riding and racing and get more people riding. Building a pro level track than punishes and quite literally breaks the riders isn’t a great way to get repeat customers.

Track owners will change their tracks if riders tell them they won't ride their aggressive layouts and stop showing up. 

1
2
30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/1/2026 2:02pm Edited Date/Time 6/1/2026 2:03pm
Smuffers wrote:
I'm generally in agreement that tracks focused on amateurs should be relatively forgiving. That said, there is nothing wrong with a track owner building a full...

I'm generally in agreement that tracks focused on amateurs should be relatively forgiving. That said, there is nothing wrong with a track owner building a full blown pro track with steep jumps and tight rhythms. It's your responsibility as a rider and/or parent to determine if a track is safe enough for you/your rider. If you aren't comfortable with the track design then don't ride. Don't bust your ass and then go out and sue the track because you crashed on a track you knew had obstacles you deemed dangerous. Absent gross negligence (parking a dozer on the landing of a jump) there shouldn't' be lawsuits against track owners for injuries suffered while riding. Motocross is one of, if not the most, dangerous sport out there, injuries will happen, and 99% of the time that injury is on the rider.  

30minmotos wrote:
Of course it’s a free country but we’re discussing how to improve local riding and racing and get more people riding. Building a pro level track...

Of course it’s a free country but we’re discussing how to improve local riding and racing and get more people riding. Building a pro level track than punishes and quite literally breaks the riders isn’t a great way to get repeat customers.

Smuffers wrote:

Track owners will change their tracks if riders tell them they won't ride their aggressive layouts and stop showing up. 

And it’s my opinion it’s happened and they haven’t responded. How many of us know folks who used to ride and aren’t willing to take the risk the current tracks ask of us? How many have gone to off road because the tracks are all jump infested? How many more could we get into it if the tracks rewarded you and encourage you instead of punish you?

3
2
6/1/2026 2:10pm
30minmotos wrote:
Of course it’s a free country but we’re discussing how to improve local riding and racing and get more people riding. Building a pro level track...

Of course it’s a free country but we’re discussing how to improve local riding and racing and get more people riding. Building a pro level track than punishes and quite literally breaks the riders isn’t a great way to get repeat customers.

Smuffers wrote:

Track owners will change their tracks if riders tell them they won't ride their aggressive layouts and stop showing up. 

30minmotos wrote:
And it’s my opinion it’s happened and they haven’t responded. How many of us know folks who used to ride and aren’t willing to take the...

And it’s my opinion it’s happened and they haven’t responded. How many of us know folks who used to ride and aren’t willing to take the risk the current tracks ask of us? How many have gone to off road because the tracks are all jump infested? How many more could we get into it if the tracks rewarded you and encourage you instead of punish you?

I don't know anyone who stopped riding mx as a result of track layouts. Regardless, my point was that owners should not face civil liability as a result of track layout. That lawsuit brought by the EKS guy was referenced and that was bs that led to the closure of that track if I'm not mistaken. 

1
30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/1/2026 2:26pm
Smuffers wrote:

Track owners will change their tracks if riders tell them they won't ride their aggressive layouts and stop showing up. 

30minmotos wrote:
And it’s my opinion it’s happened and they haven’t responded. How many of us know folks who used to ride and aren’t willing to take the...

And it’s my opinion it’s happened and they haven’t responded. How many of us know folks who used to ride and aren’t willing to take the risk the current tracks ask of us? How many have gone to off road because the tracks are all jump infested? How many more could we get into it if the tracks rewarded you and encourage you instead of punish you?

Smuffers wrote:
I don't know anyone who stopped riding mx as a result of track layouts. Regardless, my point was that owners should not face civil liability as...

I don't know anyone who stopped riding mx as a result of track layouts. Regardless, my point was that owners should not face civil liability as a result of track layout. That lawsuit brought by the EKS guy was referenced and that was bs that led to the closure of that track if I'm not mistaken. 

Regardless if it’s right or wrong, they could have made that berm safer. Use your head reduce your risk exposure, keep your customers safe, and keep them coming back.


I read through it and from what I remember it was a tall banked berm and on the back side was a sharp drop off. Taper that shit.  Just building obstacles isn’t enough. Not with 65 hp 450s and 45-55hp 250s and paddle tires and everything else.


Yeah yeah the throttle goes both ways…

3
6/1/2026 2:29pm

“QUIT SUING TRACKS”! 

Did you hear that, Rich Taylor? 

4
2
28hall
Posts
309
Joined
4/16/2019
Location
AU
6/1/2026 2:35pm
28hall wrote:
Anywhere I race its always the vets complaining the races are too long when it has already been cut to 4 laps. I will do pro...

Anywhere I race its always the vets complaining the races are too long when it has already been cut to 4 laps. I will do pro open and vet to get more track time but then I get harassed by officials about flag marshalling as I have two kids racing as well. I'm not sure what the answer is. Outrageous entry fees for big events and not enough participants at club level races has really ruined the fun and has me questioning the future.

Wo Phat wrote:

you ever stop to think that it's the vets who pay the bills? 

 Not sure of your point, I am a vet paying all the bills for myself and my kids to race? The ones always complaining are the heros that go full spastic for 2 laps then get tired so instead of toning it down a notch or working on fitness they get the races shortened. 

1
1
Dave v3.0
Posts
684
Joined
7/15/2022
Location
Ozark, AL US
6/1/2026 2:37pm
RDnutz wrote:
looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:1973 (1st year)...

looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:

1973 (1st year) CR250M Honda Elsinore MSRP $1195.00; US inflation rate 8.71%

2027 CRF Honda 250 (not WE) MSRP $8390.00; US inflation rate 2025 (last full year recorded) 2.6%

someone with more math/stats/analytical skills than me can probably extrapolate relative value over time, etc. 😉

Screenshot 2026-06-01 at 16-11-49 CPI Inflation Calculator.png?VersionId=UaJBpxbCp.NNmsshf6gs9wVq

This would be valid IF wages had kept up with inflation.  Conveniently, there's no calculator for that...but the middle class in the U.S. is a mere shadow of what it was in 1973.  That's where the disconnect falls.

6
kpiper
Posts
2411
Joined
3/20/2019
Location
AZ US
6/1/2026 4:25pm

Lack of places to ride is the biggest problem and it is only going to get worse. The high cost of bikes is 2nd. 

2
6/1/2026 7:20pm Edited Date/Time 6/1/2026 7:21pm
Wo Phat wrote:
who said that besides you?.....there was a post that was sort of disparaging vets and all i pointed out was those are the guys track owners...

who said that besides you?.....there was a post that was sort of disparaging vets and all i pointed out was those are the guys track owners should be listening to because they are the ones spending the money. without them tracks disappear. now that you may have a better understanding of what i posted, don't you think your reply was stupid?

What about all the parents that are paying their kids entry fees so they can advance to higher levels of the sport?


When the kids on 50s through superminis are entering 3-4 classes per race day vs your average vet that’s riding 1 or 2, who is a better source of revenue per rider for the track owner?

1
Wo Phat
Posts
99
Joined
3/11/2023
Location
Montgomery, AL US
6/1/2026 7:34pm
Wo Phat wrote:
who said that besides you?.....there was a post that was sort of disparaging vets and all i pointed out was those are the guys track owners...

who said that besides you?.....there was a post that was sort of disparaging vets and all i pointed out was those are the guys track owners should be listening to because they are the ones spending the money. without them tracks disappear. now that you may have a better understanding of what i posted, don't you think your reply was stupid?

Rickyisms wrote:
What about all the parents that are paying their kids entry fees so they can advance to higher levels of the sport?When the kids on 50s...

What about all the parents that are paying their kids entry fees so they can advance to higher levels of the sport?


When the kids on 50s through superminis are entering 3-4 classes per race day vs your average vet that’s riding 1 or 2, who is a better source of revenue per rider for the track owner?

i don't think the track owners are listening to the kids.....what's your point?

2
Timo
Posts
1435
Joined
1/9/2021
Location
Wichita, KS US
6/1/2026 8:55pm
Rickyisms wrote:
FWIW I did the math about a year ago on the MSRP of a brand new YZ125 vs the early 80s and it has basically stayed...

FWIW I did the math about a year ago on the MSRP of a brand new YZ125 vs the early 80s and it has basically stayed consistent with inflation. But for some reason, everyone wants a CRF450 WE or similar and then wants to bitch about how expensive the sport is.

RDnutz wrote:
looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:1973 (1st year)...

looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:

1973 (1st year) CR250M Honda Elsinore MSRP $1195.00; US inflation rate 8.71%

2027 CRF Honda 250 (not WE) MSRP $8390.00; US inflation rate 2025 (last full year recorded) 2.6%

someone with more math/stats/analytical skills than me can probably extrapolate relative value over time, etc. 😉

Was typing over lunch and got a call, trying to answer I posted mid sentence, thought I deleted it fairly quickly but not fast enough apparently. 

1973 cr250r in today's price is $89xx.xx within $900 of a crf450r.

For fun the first two years of the yz250 were limited runs, kinda like SR or WE models. Adjusted for inflation it was $13,xxx.xx in 1974, the regular yz250 came out in 76 and would be $7260.00 today. MSRP of a 26 is $8099.00, so within $1,000 and you're getting a way better bike.

The cost of bikes isn't what's killing moto, it's the cost of everything else. Trucks that are $75,000 pulling $70,000 5th wheel RVs. $1000.00 phones in everyone's pockets, TV's in every room, thousands of dollars in video games and home movies, $600,000.00 houses, $100 a month in streaming, $150 in home Internet, $300 a month in phone lines for your family, $15,000 e-mtb's, ect. It's everyone chasing the dream, but loosing site of what really matters. All you need is a beater pickup, new bike, and some gas money...

8
theraptur712
Posts
623
Joined
4/28/2022
Location
Victoria, TX US
6/1/2026 9:07pm
SoCalMX70 wrote:
First off, not a single local racer below expert/A class wants to do a 30 minute moto. Even then, most of those guys like doing 20...

First off, not a single local racer below expert/A class wants to do a 30 minute moto. Even then, most of those guys like doing 20 minutes.

9 out of 10 vet guys I know would never race a 125. Call it stupid, ego, whatever... Most of them think they absolutely need a 450.

As far as roping in E-bike riders as sugested in other posts I'm starting to see it a bit. GH just had some org there holding a huge race on the vet track. However, I don't see how that will correlate to speifically growing moto again. Most of those kids look at dirtbikes as old school, inconvenient, and expensive. They can ride their e-bike down the street from their house. A dirtbike is a whole thing with no quick satisfaction.

Anyway, the other thing people don't want to talk about is the recent drop in turn out directly correlates to the economy and economic uncertainty. Shits happening and people are holding tight with their money. I'm not going to go all non-moto, but the last huge surge in rider turn outs was mid-pandemic after everyone got their free money from the government and wanted to get out of the house. Remember all the sold out dealerships? Bike prices? Crazy times and gates were packed on the weekend. That all went away when we got back to reality, now it's a whole different problem.

Most vet guys are carrying too many lbs for 125s..

Most vet riders are on the heavie side and they go just as fast on basically any full size bike...the rider is the deciding factor. Unless you're a solid local intermediate (most vet guys aren't) the bike is the least of your worries most of the time.

3
RDnutz
Posts
673
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO US
6/2/2026 7:50am
Rickyisms wrote:
FWIW I did the math about a year ago on the MSRP of a brand new YZ125 vs the early 80s and it has basically stayed...

FWIW I did the math about a year ago on the MSRP of a brand new YZ125 vs the early 80s and it has basically stayed consistent with inflation. But for some reason, everyone wants a CRF450 WE or similar and then wants to bitch about how expensive the sport is.

RDnutz wrote:
looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:1973 (1st year)...

looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:

1973 (1st year) CR250M Honda Elsinore MSRP $1195.00; US inflation rate 8.71%

2027 CRF Honda 250 (not WE) MSRP $8390.00; US inflation rate 2025 (last full year recorded) 2.6%

someone with more math/stats/analytical skills than me can probably extrapolate relative value over time, etc. 😉

Timo wrote:
Was typing over lunch and got a call, trying to answer I posted mid sentence, thought I deleted it fairly quickly but not fast enough apparently. 1973...

Was typing over lunch and got a call, trying to answer I posted mid sentence, thought I deleted it fairly quickly but not fast enough apparently. 

1973 cr250r in today's price is $89xx.xx within $900 of a crf450r.

For fun the first two years of the yz250 were limited runs, kinda like SR or WE models. Adjusted for inflation it was $13,xxx.xx in 1974, the regular yz250 came out in 76 and would be $7260.00 today. MSRP of a 26 is $8099.00, so within $1,000 and you're getting a way better bike.

The cost of bikes isn't what's killing moto, it's the cost of everything else. Trucks that are $75,000 pulling $70,000 5th wheel RVs. $1000.00 phones in everyone's pockets, TV's in every room, thousands of dollars in video games and home movies, $600,000.00 houses, $100 a month in streaming, $150 in home Internet, $300 a month in phone lines for your family, $15,000 e-mtb's, ect. It's everyone chasing the dream, but loosing site of what really matters. All you need is a beater pickup, new bike, and some gas money...

totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal choices spending big $ and using credit to buy/enjoy things that aren't necessities or smart purchases to support a way of living to "keep up with the Joneses' " as they used to say in my formative years of 1960's, 70's, 80's.  That is a recipe for disaster long term and has to be intentionally avoided and worked around as a way of life to get ahead or at least tread water comfortably these days, IMO.

The FOMO and YOLO followers might disagree with me 😉

30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/2/2026 8:03am Edited Date/Time 6/2/2026 8:22am
RDnutz wrote:
looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:1973 (1st year)...

looks like Timo deleted his post about MSRP on Honda CR250 and inflation and perception of "expensive" but this is what I dug up:

1973 (1st year) CR250M Honda Elsinore MSRP $1195.00; US inflation rate 8.71%

2027 CRF Honda 250 (not WE) MSRP $8390.00; US inflation rate 2025 (last full year recorded) 2.6%

someone with more math/stats/analytical skills than me can probably extrapolate relative value over time, etc. 😉

Timo wrote:
Was typing over lunch and got a call, trying to answer I posted mid sentence, thought I deleted it fairly quickly but not fast enough apparently. 1973...

Was typing over lunch and got a call, trying to answer I posted mid sentence, thought I deleted it fairly quickly but not fast enough apparently. 

1973 cr250r in today's price is $89xx.xx within $900 of a crf450r.

For fun the first two years of the yz250 were limited runs, kinda like SR or WE models. Adjusted for inflation it was $13,xxx.xx in 1974, the regular yz250 came out in 76 and would be $7260.00 today. MSRP of a 26 is $8099.00, so within $1,000 and you're getting a way better bike.

The cost of bikes isn't what's killing moto, it's the cost of everything else. Trucks that are $75,000 pulling $70,000 5th wheel RVs. $1000.00 phones in everyone's pockets, TV's in every room, thousands of dollars in video games and home movies, $600,000.00 houses, $100 a month in streaming, $150 in home Internet, $300 a month in phone lines for your family, $15,000 e-mtb's, ect. It's everyone chasing the dream, but loosing site of what really matters. All you need is a beater pickup, new bike, and some gas money...

RDnutz wrote:
totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal...

totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal choices spending big $ and using credit to buy/enjoy things that aren't necessities or smart purchases to support a way of living to "keep up with the Joneses' " as they used to say in my formative years of 1960's, 70's, 80's.  That is a recipe for disaster long term and has to be intentionally avoided and worked around as a way of life to get ahead or at least tread water comfortably these days, IMO.

The FOMO and YOLO followers might disagree with me 😉

Somewhat true, I agree, I used to agree 100% with what you’re saying but since 2020 is a WALL. Before 2020 you could live smart, live frugal and buy a house on one salary ( one strong salary)


After 2020 especially since 2022 you really can’t do it anymore. If you are entering the housing market with a reasonable savings for a down payment first time home buyer starting out with a family type scenario, it’s insanely tough now.


Anyone who bought before 2022 take another look at the numbers, put yourself in that situation, not with your insanely inflated 401k and house you bought in 1980 that’s up 5x since then.


Like imagine you make 90k, have 40k saved, have a new baby, and you want your wife to stay at home. New house payment is 3 grand a month.


90k income after modest contributions, health insurance , taxes is 4000 a month.


1000 a month left over. Diapers, formula, car insurance , lights, internet, food, gas to your high paying job, car maintenance, cable or some streaming service, are we doing anything at all for fun?, etc etc


You think 1000 after housing per month is doable? 250 per week. 250 per week to pay for all that stuff.


That’s not a single extravagant purchase yet. That’s not a car payment, that’s not full coverage insurance on a newer car, 


Throw in a single $600 a month car payment and then insurance (600 car payment is fairly modest anymore) and there’s effective no margin at all.


That’s buying an average house in the average suburbs to be close enough to a decent job that pays 90k per year, to provide for a stay at home family that was incredibly common in the 70s 80s etc


These are real world numbers too. My friends and I are the age that is just starting out or have been for a little while.


Interest rates on houses went from 2.5-3.5% range to 5.5-8% while prices increased like a run away train. So even if prices stayed the same (they didn’t) houses got much less affordable/l. Add the cost of insurance, taxes, everything going up like a rocket, life is not the same for folks starting out now, that it is for any of us who owned their house prior to 2022 trust me. 

 


Anyway off topic but it’s a huge topic still.


And honestly I low balled those estimates a bit.


Look up the average house price today it’s 436k

The scenario i said, new family starting out 40k downpayment their payment will be well over 3k


So basically impossible to start out have a new baby and buy a house. Or buy a house and plan to have a baby shortly after.


It’s basically impossible.


Which  leads to why some generations are yolo-ing their money away on vacations and mocha latte experiences because what’s been told to them is a lie and impossible to achieve any semblance of the American dream for themselves.


It’ll take 2-3 income both people working maybe a second job, kid in day care, no free time to actually make ends meet.


So yeah no dirtbike money leftover, it buying a house and having a family is on the list: now add in most folks have college debt that everyone told them is the way to go and will help them, they probably have a car loan because everyone told them to buy something reliable. Now it’s quite literally almost impossible without being in a top field and being super industrious to just own a suburban house and raise a family. 

 


Rant over lol

6
3
RDnutz
Posts
673
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO US
6/2/2026 8:26am Edited Date/Time 6/2/2026 8:29am
Timo wrote:
Was typing over lunch and got a call, trying to answer I posted mid sentence, thought I deleted it fairly quickly but not fast enough apparently. 1973...

Was typing over lunch and got a call, trying to answer I posted mid sentence, thought I deleted it fairly quickly but not fast enough apparently. 

1973 cr250r in today's price is $89xx.xx within $900 of a crf450r.

For fun the first two years of the yz250 were limited runs, kinda like SR or WE models. Adjusted for inflation it was $13,xxx.xx in 1974, the regular yz250 came out in 76 and would be $7260.00 today. MSRP of a 26 is $8099.00, so within $1,000 and you're getting a way better bike.

The cost of bikes isn't what's killing moto, it's the cost of everything else. Trucks that are $75,000 pulling $70,000 5th wheel RVs. $1000.00 phones in everyone's pockets, TV's in every room, thousands of dollars in video games and home movies, $600,000.00 houses, $100 a month in streaming, $150 in home Internet, $300 a month in phone lines for your family, $15,000 e-mtb's, ect. It's everyone chasing the dream, but loosing site of what really matters. All you need is a beater pickup, new bike, and some gas money...

RDnutz wrote:
totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal...

totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal choices spending big $ and using credit to buy/enjoy things that aren't necessities or smart purchases to support a way of living to "keep up with the Joneses' " as they used to say in my formative years of 1960's, 70's, 80's.  That is a recipe for disaster long term and has to be intentionally avoided and worked around as a way of life to get ahead or at least tread water comfortably these days, IMO.

The FOMO and YOLO followers might disagree with me 😉

30minmotos wrote:
Somewhat true, I agree, I used to agree 100% with what you’re saying but since 2020 is a WALL. Before 2020 you could live smart, live...

Somewhat true, I agree, I used to agree 100% with what you’re saying but since 2020 is a WALL. Before 2020 you could live smart, live frugal and buy a house on one salary ( one strong salary)


After 2020 especially since 2022 you really can’t do it anymore. If you are entering the housing market with a reasonable savings for a down payment first time home buyer starting out with a family type scenario, it’s insanely tough now.


Anyone who bought before 2022 take another look at the numbers, put yourself in that situation, not with your insanely inflated 401k and house you bought in 1980 that’s up 5x since then.


Like imagine you make 90k, have 40k saved, have a new baby, and you want your wife to stay at home. New house payment is 3 grand a month.


90k income after modest contributions, health insurance , taxes is 4000 a month.


1000 a month left over. Diapers, formula, car insurance , lights, internet, food, gas to your high paying job, car maintenance, cable or some streaming service, are we doing anything at all for fun?, etc etc


You think 1000 after housing per month is doable? 250 per week. 250 per week to pay for all that stuff.


That’s not a single extravagant purchase yet. That’s not a car payment, that’s not full coverage insurance on a newer car, 


Throw in a single $600 a month car payment and then insurance (600 car payment is fairly modest anymore) and there’s effective no margin at all.


That’s buying an average house in the average suburbs to be close enough to a decent job that pays 90k per year, to provide for a stay at home family that was incredibly common in the 70s 80s etc


These are real world numbers too. My friends and I are the age that is just starting out or have been for a little while.


Interest rates on houses went from 2.5-3.5% range to 5.5-8% while prices increased like a run away train. So even if prices stayed the same (they didn’t) houses got much less affordable/l. Add the cost of insurance, taxes, everything going up like a rocket, life is not the same for folks starting out now, that it is for any of us who owned their house prior to 2022 trust me. 

 


Anyway off topic but it’s a huge topic still.


And honestly I low balled those estimates a bit.


Look up the average house price today it’s 436k

The scenario i said, new family starting out 40k downpayment their payment will be well over 3k


So basically impossible to start out have a new baby and buy a house. Or buy a house and plan to have a baby shortly after.


It’s basically impossible.


Which  leads to why some generations are yolo-ing their money away on vacations and mocha latte experiences because what’s been told to them is a lie and impossible to achieve any semblance of the American dream for themselves.


It’ll take 2-3 income both people working maybe a second job, kid in day care, no free time to actually make ends meet.


So yeah no dirtbike money leftover, it buying a house and having a family is on the list: now add in most folks have college debt that everyone told them is the way to go and will help them, they probably have a car loan because everyone told them to buy something reliable. Now it’s quite literally almost impossible without being in a top field and being super industrious to just own a suburban house and raise a family. 

 


Rant over lol

you're trying to compare "the way it used to be" vs. what is reality now. There were rules and suggestions and paths to live by back then and while it never GUARANTEED success or happiness back then you buckled down, worked hard, delayed gratification and hoped for the best. Figure out what your own rules are to live by for this generation and do your best. I can tell you from personal experience my wife and I both chose not to have a family and denied ourselves pleasures to contribute as much as possible to 401ks offered at work and bought fixer upper homes in not great areas to start with and worked to improve our situation over time. We had no concept of the stock market boosting those savings plans to try to become 401k millionaires, huge housing market appreciation profits or any such fantasies and just tried to be smart about choices that we hoped would provide a decent lifestyle when we retired. A lot of it is luck, but smart planning for decades into your future turned out to be the ticket for us. That and leaving our San Diego home and lifestyle of 50+ years for a more affordable part of the country was instrumental as well.

3
30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/2/2026 8:27am Edited Date/Time 6/2/2026 8:30am
RDnutz wrote:
totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal...

totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal choices spending big $ and using credit to buy/enjoy things that aren't necessities or smart purchases to support a way of living to "keep up with the Joneses' " as they used to say in my formative years of 1960's, 70's, 80's.  That is a recipe for disaster long term and has to be intentionally avoided and worked around as a way of life to get ahead or at least tread water comfortably these days, IMO.

The FOMO and YOLO followers might disagree with me 😉

30minmotos wrote:
Somewhat true, I agree, I used to agree 100% with what you’re saying but since 2020 is a WALL. Before 2020 you could live smart, live...

Somewhat true, I agree, I used to agree 100% with what you’re saying but since 2020 is a WALL. Before 2020 you could live smart, live frugal and buy a house on one salary ( one strong salary)


After 2020 especially since 2022 you really can’t do it anymore. If you are entering the housing market with a reasonable savings for a down payment first time home buyer starting out with a family type scenario, it’s insanely tough now.


Anyone who bought before 2022 take another look at the numbers, put yourself in that situation, not with your insanely inflated 401k and house you bought in 1980 that’s up 5x since then.


Like imagine you make 90k, have 40k saved, have a new baby, and you want your wife to stay at home. New house payment is 3 grand a month.


90k income after modest contributions, health insurance , taxes is 4000 a month.


1000 a month left over. Diapers, formula, car insurance , lights, internet, food, gas to your high paying job, car maintenance, cable or some streaming service, are we doing anything at all for fun?, etc etc


You think 1000 after housing per month is doable? 250 per week. 250 per week to pay for all that stuff.


That’s not a single extravagant purchase yet. That’s not a car payment, that’s not full coverage insurance on a newer car, 


Throw in a single $600 a month car payment and then insurance (600 car payment is fairly modest anymore) and there’s effective no margin at all.


That’s buying an average house in the average suburbs to be close enough to a decent job that pays 90k per year, to provide for a stay at home family that was incredibly common in the 70s 80s etc


These are real world numbers too. My friends and I are the age that is just starting out or have been for a little while.


Interest rates on houses went from 2.5-3.5% range to 5.5-8% while prices increased like a run away train. So even if prices stayed the same (they didn’t) houses got much less affordable/l. Add the cost of insurance, taxes, everything going up like a rocket, life is not the same for folks starting out now, that it is for any of us who owned their house prior to 2022 trust me. 

 


Anyway off topic but it’s a huge topic still.


And honestly I low balled those estimates a bit.


Look up the average house price today it’s 436k

The scenario i said, new family starting out 40k downpayment their payment will be well over 3k


So basically impossible to start out have a new baby and buy a house. Or buy a house and plan to have a baby shortly after.


It’s basically impossible.


Which  leads to why some generations are yolo-ing their money away on vacations and mocha latte experiences because what’s been told to them is a lie and impossible to achieve any semblance of the American dream for themselves.


It’ll take 2-3 income both people working maybe a second job, kid in day care, no free time to actually make ends meet.


So yeah no dirtbike money leftover, it buying a house and having a family is on the list: now add in most folks have college debt that everyone told them is the way to go and will help them, they probably have a car loan because everyone told them to buy something reliable. Now it’s quite literally almost impossible without being in a top field and being super industrious to just own a suburban house and raise a family. 

 


Rant over lol

RDnutz wrote:
you're trying to compare "the way it used to be" vs. what is reality now. There were rules and suggestions and paths to live by back...

you're trying to compare "the way it used to be" vs. what is reality now. There were rules and suggestions and paths to live by back then and while it never GUARANTEED success or happiness back then you buckled down, worked hard, delayed gratification and hoped for the best. Figure out what your own rules are to live by for this generation and do your best. I can tell you from personal experience my wife and I both chose not to have a family and denied ourselves pleasures to contribute as much as possible to 401ks offered at work and bought fixer upper homes in not great areas to start with and worked to improve our situation over time. We had no concept of the stock market boosting those savings plans to try to become 401k millionaires, huge housing market appreciation profits or any such fantasies and just tried to be smart about choices that we hoped would provide a decent lifestyle when we retired. A lot of it is luck, but smart planning for decades into your future turned out to be the ticket for us. That and leaving our San Diego home and lifestyle of 50+ years for a more affordable part of the country was instrumental as well.

Yeah dude, 2 incomes and no kids you would succeed no matter what.  Like I said put yourself in the actual shoes of a realistic average scenario if not an optimistic scenario..


Say you’re 24 making 90k a year with zero debt and 40k cash in the bank. You got the love of your life pregnant it’s time to buy an average house in the average suburbs that the average person has always done:


Oh wait even making 90k a year and no debt you literally can’t afford a house.


In what universe is that ok?


That’s not what it’s been for Americans, up until late/

It’s sad.


But yeah I’m happy for you and your wife and I’m going to figure it out for myself and my family like you said, but it’s not as simple as cutting out luxuries and soy lattes like your prior sentiment suggested.


It’s way worse than that.

2
2
OwenJakes
Posts
1757
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY US
6/2/2026 8:45am
kage173 wrote:

You lost me at 30 minute motos. 

No fucking way I'm racing 30 minutes in 110 degree Texas weather. 

30minmotos wrote:
What’s the alternative? 4 lap motos? Why bother? How tough are we? Other athletes do their marathons, mud runs, fitness events they aren’t 8 minutes. 4...

What’s the alternative? 4 lap motos? Why bother? How tough are we? Other athletes do their marathons, mud runs, fitness events they aren’t 8 minutes. 4 lap races are a joke.

I’m all for heatwave racing. It’s gnarly and it’s not that hot honestly. 

We don’t run marathons in the summer though lol 

2
30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/2/2026 9:19am Edited Date/Time 6/2/2026 10:10am
RDnutz wrote:
totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal...

totally agree with your last paragraph. That's what I was calling out; people complaining bikes/the sport was "too expensive" when reality is they are making personal choices spending big $ and using credit to buy/enjoy things that aren't necessities or smart purchases to support a way of living to "keep up with the Joneses' " as they used to say in my formative years of 1960's, 70's, 80's.  That is a recipe for disaster long term and has to be intentionally avoided and worked around as a way of life to get ahead or at least tread water comfortably these days, IMO.

The FOMO and YOLO followers might disagree with me 😉

30minmotos wrote:
Somewhat true, I agree, I used to agree 100% with what you’re saying but since 2020 is a WALL. Before 2020 you could live smart, live...

Somewhat true, I agree, I used to agree 100% with what you’re saying but since 2020 is a WALL. Before 2020 you could live smart, live frugal and buy a house on one salary ( one strong salary)


After 2020 especially since 2022 you really can’t do it anymore. If you are entering the housing market with a reasonable savings for a down payment first time home buyer starting out with a family type scenario, it’s insanely tough now.


Anyone who bought before 2022 take another look at the numbers, put yourself in that situation, not with your insanely inflated 401k and house you bought in 1980 that’s up 5x since then.


Like imagine you make 90k, have 40k saved, have a new baby, and you want your wife to stay at home. New house payment is 3 grand a month.


90k income after modest contributions, health insurance , taxes is 4000 a month.


1000 a month left over. Diapers, formula, car insurance , lights, internet, food, gas to your high paying job, car maintenance, cable or some streaming service, are we doing anything at all for fun?, etc etc


You think 1000 after housing per month is doable? 250 per week. 250 per week to pay for all that stuff.


That’s not a single extravagant purchase yet. That’s not a car payment, that’s not full coverage insurance on a newer car, 


Throw in a single $600 a month car payment and then insurance (600 car payment is fairly modest anymore) and there’s effective no margin at all.


That’s buying an average house in the average suburbs to be close enough to a decent job that pays 90k per year, to provide for a stay at home family that was incredibly common in the 70s 80s etc


These are real world numbers too. My friends and I are the age that is just starting out or have been for a little while.


Interest rates on houses went from 2.5-3.5% range to 5.5-8% while prices increased like a run away train. So even if prices stayed the same (they didn’t) houses got much less affordable/l. Add the cost of insurance, taxes, everything going up like a rocket, life is not the same for folks starting out now, that it is for any of us who owned their house prior to 2022 trust me. 

 


Anyway off topic but it’s a huge topic still.


And honestly I low balled those estimates a bit.


Look up the average house price today it’s 436k

The scenario i said, new family starting out 40k downpayment their payment will be well over 3k


So basically impossible to start out have a new baby and buy a house. Or buy a house and plan to have a baby shortly after.


It’s basically impossible.


Which  leads to why some generations are yolo-ing their money away on vacations and mocha latte experiences because what’s been told to them is a lie and impossible to achieve any semblance of the American dream for themselves.


It’ll take 2-3 income both people working maybe a second job, kid in day care, no free time to actually make ends meet.


So yeah no dirtbike money leftover, it buying a house and having a family is on the list: now add in most folks have college debt that everyone told them is the way to go and will help them, they probably have a car loan because everyone told them to buy something reliable. Now it’s quite literally almost impossible without being in a top field and being super industrious to just own a suburban house and raise a family. 

 


Rant over lol

RDnutz wrote:
you're trying to compare "the way it used to be" vs. what is reality now. There were rules and suggestions and paths to live by back...

you're trying to compare "the way it used to be" vs. what is reality now. There were rules and suggestions and paths to live by back then and while it never GUARANTEED success or happiness back then you buckled down, worked hard, delayed gratification and hoped for the best. Figure out what your own rules are to live by for this generation and do your best. I can tell you from personal experience my wife and I both chose not to have a family and denied ourselves pleasures to contribute as much as possible to 401ks offered at work and bought fixer upper homes in not great areas to start with and worked to improve our situation over time. We had no concept of the stock market boosting those savings plans to try to become 401k millionaires, huge housing market appreciation profits or any such fantasies and just tried to be smart about choices that we hoped would provide a decent lifestyle when we retired. A lot of it is luck, but smart planning for decades into your future turned out to be the ticket for us. That and leaving our San Diego home and lifestyle of 50+ years for a more affordable part of the country was instrumental as well.

RD this isn’t an attack but it’s hard to put yourself in a different position.

Another part of your perspective that really won’t apply is that line:

“A lot of it is luck, but smart planning for decades into your future turned out to be the ticket for us. That and leaving our San Diego home and lifestyle of 50+ years for a more affordable part of the country was instrumental as well.”


So you lived and worked in an incredibly high cost of living and high paying area. Then when your property value was I’m guessing incredibly high due to the exact inflation and issues in describing, you sold it for top dollar, took your 401ks that have done insanely well and moved to middle of nowhere for 1/3 the cost and 3x the property with 1/10th the taxes.


Thats all just a guess on how it went but it’s fairly realistic based on what everyone has done, but that’s exactly what the folks who are starting out won’t have. Like I said, truly try to imagine making 90k at 24 and wanting to buy a house. Who the heck makes 90k at 24 anyway. 


 

2
2
RDnutz
Posts
673
Joined
2/13/2021
Location
Dolores, CO US
6/2/2026 10:18am Edited Date/Time 6/2/2026 10:20am
30minmotos wrote:
RD this isn’t an attack but it’s hard to put yourself in a different position.Another part of your perspective that really won’t apply is that line:“A...

RD this isn’t an attack but it’s hard to put yourself in a different position.

Another part of your perspective that really won’t apply is that line:

“A lot of it is luck, but smart planning for decades into your future turned out to be the ticket for us. That and leaving our San Diego home and lifestyle of 50+ years for a more affordable part of the country was instrumental as well.”


So you lived and worked in an incredibly high cost of living and high paying area. Then when your property value was I’m guessing incredibly high due to the exact inflation and issues in describing, you sold it for top dollar, took your 401ks that have done insanely well and moved to middle of nowhere for 1/3 the cost and 3x the property with 1/10th the taxes.


Thats all just a guess on how it went but it’s fairly realistic based on what everyone has done, but that’s exactly what the folks who are starting out won’t have. Like I said, truly try to imagine making 90k at 24 and wanting to buy a house. Who the heck makes 90k at 24 anyway. 


 

I've BEEN in a different position most of my life: 1st paying job @ age 16 for $1.75/hr in 1974 living with parents. Got my own place 1980 working full time and going to community college and rented a studio apartment subsidized for Seniors. Had friends with parents helping them buy their 1st houses. Not mine! Marriage, kids, buying house were not on my radar at all. Wasn't until 1987 (age 29) I could start establishing credit buying a Ford Ranger through affordable company credit union loan making $8.75/hr. Was renting rooms or low budget apts in bad parts of town. Kept working and going to college and by 1992 thought about maybe affording a condo. Nobody in my situation was looking to buy a house and raise a family at age 24 with single income. Life isn't fair...

So you identified your problem of not being able to buy a house and start a family so young- what are you going to do about it?

30minmotos
Posts
1010
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
6/2/2026 10:20am
30minmotos wrote:
RD this isn’t an attack but it’s hard to put yourself in a different position.Another part of your perspective that really won’t apply is that line:“A...

RD this isn’t an attack but it’s hard to put yourself in a different position.

Another part of your perspective that really won’t apply is that line:

“A lot of it is luck, but smart planning for decades into your future turned out to be the ticket for us. That and leaving our San Diego home and lifestyle of 50+ years for a more affordable part of the country was instrumental as well.”


So you lived and worked in an incredibly high cost of living and high paying area. Then when your property value was I’m guessing incredibly high due to the exact inflation and issues in describing, you sold it for top dollar, took your 401ks that have done insanely well and moved to middle of nowhere for 1/3 the cost and 3x the property with 1/10th the taxes.


Thats all just a guess on how it went but it’s fairly realistic based on what everyone has done, but that’s exactly what the folks who are starting out won’t have. Like I said, truly try to imagine making 90k at 24 and wanting to buy a house. Who the heck makes 90k at 24 anyway. 


 

RDnutz wrote:
I've BEEN in a different position most of my life: 1st paying job @ age 16 for $1.75/hr in 1974 living with parents. Got my own...

I've BEEN in a different position most of my life: 1st paying job @ age 16 for $1.75/hr in 1974 living with parents. Got my own place 1980 working full time and going to community college and rented a studio apartment subsidized for Seniors. Had friends with parents helping them buy their 1st houses. Not mine! Marriage, kids, buying house were not on my radar at all. Wasn't until 1987 (age 29) I could start establishing credit buying a Ford Ranger through affordable company credit union loan making $8.75/hr. Was renting rooms or low budget apts in bad parts of town. Kept working and going to college and by 1992 thought about maybe affording a condo. Nobody in my situation was looking to buy a house and raise a family at age 24 with single income. Life isn't fair...

So you identified your problem of not being able to buy a house and start a family so young- what are you going to do about it?

So you didn’t take the time to really explore that scenario.


Check.


As far as me, I told you, I will provide for my family and we will make it. But it’s way harder than cutting out luxuries like you’re saying.


The scenario I painted shows that, but you won’t take the time to look at a perspective other than your lived experience.


It’s ok, I appreciate the conversation, and I’m honestly glad for you. You guys are living the dream and broke out of the rat race, it’s commendable!!

1
1

Post a reply to: Grow the sport? Fix local tracks and racing.

The Latest