Washington Rider Shot and Killed

10/5/2023 9:27pm
wwdiii wrote:
I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a...

I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a different set of laws and jurisdiction than private owned property.  Different laws, judges, law enforcement you name it.  I would guess in South African there are land/property owned by individuals and owned by the South African government.  Therefore law enforced by different entities if I had to guess.

I can’t say about a contract security guard on federal land providing security.  But a US federal law enforcement officer, federal Game warden or whoever federal are not to be fucked with.  They are the wrong bear to poke.  Same with trespassing.  Trespassing on federal land in this country is not always the smartest thing to do.  

With all that said, if you read the article it says being investigated by local law enforcement if I read it correctly.  Which kinda says the shooting was not on federal owned property.

I feel bad for this all families involved, a life was lost.  Then again rights is right and wrong is wrong.  It’ should be easier to march than fight, especially with someone with a gun.  

 

Apply your logic to illegals crossing into Texas in Big Bend national park, which is federal land.  They are entering illegally and are trespassing.  Confrontations occur daily.  Same rules still apply to everyone?  With respect to the incident that occurred, there simply isn't enough information to take any side IMHO.  I've seen dipshits riding dirtbikes at places they shouldn't have been and I've seen dipshit cops/LEO do stupid corrupt shit - or some that just make mistakes in the moment.  No one knows what happened.  And just because it was federal land doesn't mean anything, see first comment above.  

7
2
10/5/2023 9:36pm
Coach529 wrote:
Two things: 1. Witnesses say both him and his son were in a physical interaction with the guard. 2. Washington is a Stand your Ground State...

Two things:

1. Witnesses say both him and his son were in a physical interaction with the guard.

2. Washington is a Stand your Ground State.

Not saying it was or was not justified......but not one person here knows the truth.

 

PhunnyGuy wrote:
yes you can have a stand your ground law. this is an affirmative defense, but now you have a burden shift. The burden is on the...

yes you can have a stand your ground law. this is an affirmative defense, but now you have a burden shift. The burden is on the security guard in this case to prove that a reasonable person would believe he is in imminent danger of death or severe injury. Stand your ground almost never justifies shooting an attacker with bare hands.

FGR01 wrote:
Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are...

Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are irrelevant.   This appears to not be a case of a crazy private property owner over reacting.  This appears to be a case of a Federal Agent protecting federal property/critical infrastructure.  If you are not familiar with the Federal laws pertaining to trespassing on federal property/critical infrastructure or the Rules of engagement that Federal Officers have to protect that, you really should not comment.

Uh .. are they going to guard every transmission right of way Bonneville owns ? 

I ride Sadie creek dnr OHV trail it runs under Bonneville 138kv lines for miles,  no one's guarding them. No problems

Also they have a national at washougal and there are two 230kv bonneville lines running through there. 

What a joke.

1
11
nskerb
Posts
537
Joined
11/21/2019
Location
Kelso, WA US
10/5/2023 9:57pm

As people have said before, there isn’t enough context to this story so far. Maybe the fed (or contractor?) was escalating thing, maybe the father son were. But one thing is for sure. Getting into a physical altercation with anybody that you know has a gun on them is never going to end well. Even if the guy with the gun is the one escalating, run the fuck away before getting physical. 

16
Gmyersdork
Posts
339
Joined
2/16/2021
Location
Beverly Hills, FL US
10/5/2023 10:01pm

Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I and my children abide by. Dont ride your legally obtained dirtbike on my property, unless you ask. Its actually easy

10
3

The Shop

Timo
Posts
1408
Joined
1/9/2021
Location
Wichita, KS US
10/5/2023 10:02pm

My approach with LEO's is if they didn't want to shoot someone they'd have picked a different career, especially snipers, so always assume they'll shoot before a rational person would expect. There are good ones out there, but there's also a lot that I wouldn't trust with a gun ever. 

This rings home for me because to get to our local river trails we ride  1/3 mile down some residential streets and then down a flood control ditch that's technically illegal. It's the only way to access the river though because the government never put in access points. I hear people say that the wheelie guys should get ran over by the cops and all I think of is my son and I cruising 20mph down to the trails and a maniac cop runs us down from behind...

A guy was shot by a sniper here in Wichita a few years ago during a SWATing. He was super confused and was pulling up his sweat pants. Four cops on the porch with him didn't feel threatened, but the sniper across the street did... 

7
23
Gmyersdork
Posts
339
Joined
2/16/2021
Location
Beverly Hills, FL US
10/5/2023 10:05pm
Timo wrote:
My approach with LEO's is if they didn't want to shoot someone they'd have picked a different career, especially snipers, so always assume they'll shoot before...

My approach with LEO's is if they didn't want to shoot someone they'd have picked a different career, especially snipers, so always assume they'll shoot before a rational person would expect. There are good ones out there, but there's also a lot that I wouldn't trust with a gun ever. 

This rings home for me because to get to our local river trails we ride  1/3 mile down some residential streets and then down a flood control ditch that's technically illegal. It's the only way to access the river though because the government never put in access points. I hear people say that the wheelie guys should get ran over by the cops and all I think of is my son and I cruising 20mph down to the trails and a maniac cop runs us down from behind...

A guy was shot by a sniper here in Wichita a few years ago during a SWATing. He was super confused and was pulling up his sweat pants. Four cops on the porch with him didn't feel threatened, but the sniper across the street did... 

No

5
6
Gmyersdork
Posts
339
Joined
2/16/2021
Location
Beverly Hills, FL US
10/5/2023 10:06pm
Gmyersdork wrote:
Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I...

Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I and my children abide by. Dont ride your legally obtained dirtbike on my property, unless you ask. Its actually easy

Yes 

1
7
Gmyersdork
Posts
339
Joined
2/16/2021
Location
Beverly Hills, FL US
10/5/2023 10:48pm
PhunnyGuy wrote:
yes you can have a stand your ground law. this is an affirmative defense, but now you have a burden shift. The burden is on the...

yes you can have a stand your ground law. this is an affirmative defense, but now you have a burden shift. The burden is on the security guard in this case to prove that a reasonable person would believe he is in imminent danger of death or severe injury. Stand your ground almost never justifies shooting an attacker with bare hands.

FGR01 wrote:
Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are...

Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are irrelevant.   This appears to not be a case of a crazy private property owner over reacting.  This appears to be a case of a Federal Agent protecting federal property/critical infrastructure.  If you are not familiar with the Federal laws pertaining to trespassing on federal property/critical infrastructure or the Rules of engagement that Federal Officers have to protect that, you really should not comment.

Uh .. are they going to guard every transmission right of way Bonneville owns ?  I ride Sadie creek dnr OHV trail it runs under Bonneville...

Uh .. are they going to guard every transmission right of way Bonneville owns ? 

I ride Sadie creek dnr OHV trail it runs under Bonneville 138kv lines for miles,  no one's guarding them. No problems

Also they have a national at washougal and there are two 230kv bonneville lines running through there. 

What a joke.

Dont trespass, it's not a joke

1
4
Radical
Posts
2835
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA US
10/5/2023 11:53pm
Radical wrote:
If they're attacking my son, I'm going to protect him, even if it costs me my life. Resolving issues without violence should always be the first...

If they're attacking my son, I'm going to protect him, even if it costs me my life.

Resolving issues without violence should always be the first goal, but mess with someone's kid, there's going to be trouble.

We need to see details on what happened.  It's possible the victim and his son handled the interaction poorly, but it could also turn out that the security guard is at fault.  If he is, I could give a F whether he's a federal agent.  He needs to be held accountable.

The rules of engagement in this country should be equal for everyone, whether or not they're in law enforcement.

If it's not right for a citizen to shoot someone, it should not be OK for law enforcement to shoot someone in that exact same situation.

Radical wrote:

For those who downvoted, I'm not offended.  But what do you disagree with me on?

lostboy819 wrote:
You seem to be making up your own facts to fit your opinion. This isn't about you or your son or what you would do. This...

You seem to be making up your own facts to fit your opinion. This isn't about you or your son or what you would do. This is about what happened that none of us saw or know what lead up to the shooting. The facts will come out and then we will hear what happened. 

I'm not making up facts. I said clearly that we need to see details on what happened, and provided my thoughts on 2 scenarios.

The point I'm making is that the rules of engagement, the right of anyone to shoot someone else, should be identical, whether or not they're in law enforcement, whether they're local, or federal.  There should be one set of rules, and everyone should be held accountable for their actions.

It's either justified, or it isn't.

2
Radical
Posts
2835
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA US
10/6/2023 12:15am Edited Date/Time 10/6/2023 12:34am
Radical wrote:
When I was a kid, the only places to ride around my house were all private property.  The question wasn't if it was legal.  The question...

When I was a kid, the only places to ride around my house were all private property.  The question wasn't if it was legal.  The question was if it was cool to ride there.

If it was a cool place to ride (meaning no one was getting ticketed for it), then yes, there are places I would take my son.

That was the culture in San Diego way back when.  Not just for me.  That's how most people saw it.

If someone approached and asked me to leave, I definitely would, and I'd have a cordial conversation with them about riding there.

But, like I said in my post, resolving issues without violence is the way to go.  I'm not going to purposely start trouble.  But, if my kid is in danger, I'm going to do what I have to to protect him.

We don't know whether the father started trouble, or if the guy who shot him did.  I'm hoping we'll get the truth, and most importantly, that his family does.

There's another issue about riding on private land.

When I was 13 or 14, I reached out to the owner of some trails by my house, and asked if we could ride there.

He spoke with his attorneys, then told me in so many words that he was OK with us riding there, but he couldn't actually give us permission or he could be liable.  So we rode there for about 3 years until I moved.

He was a very cool guy.

early wrote:
The reality of today, and the lesson moving forward from this tragedy should be whatever you've been doing for the last 20 years doesn't mean jack...

The reality of today, and the lesson moving forward from this tragedy should be whatever you've been doing for the last 20 years doesn't mean jack if the land owner doesn't want you riding there today.

The industry needs to get its act together to preserve and expand legal riding areas and rights for private property owners to ride on their own land. Offroad motorcycling won't survive if it relies on ponying up $10k for a bike to ride past no trespassing signs.

Agreed!  If the owner doesn't want you riding there, don't ride there!

And there needs to be more riding areas, but there aren't. There are fewer and fewer.  The money we spend to register dirt bikes gets used for other things.

2
TerryB
Posts
2824
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN US
10/6/2023 1:06am
wwdiii wrote:
I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a...

I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a different set of laws and jurisdiction than private owned property.  Different laws, judges, law enforcement you name it.  I would guess in South African there are land/property owned by individuals and owned by the South African government.  Therefore law enforced by different entities if I had to guess.

I can’t say about a contract security guard on federal land providing security.  But a US federal law enforcement officer, federal Game warden or whoever federal are not to be fucked with.  They are the wrong bear to poke.  Same with trespassing.  Trespassing on federal land in this country is not always the smartest thing to do.  

With all that said, if you read the article it says being investigated by local law enforcement if I read it correctly.  Which kinda says the shooting was not on federal owned property.

I feel bad for this all families involved, a life was lost.  Then again rights is right and wrong is wrong.  It’ should be easier to march than fight, especially with someone with a gun.  

 

This.

People don't understand that Federal Laws/ dealing with the Feds is a whole different set of rules. Most don't realize that they can still be prosecuted for marijuana violations, Federally, even if it is legal in their State.  It just depends how motivated the Feds are, in jamming you up.

1
10/6/2023 2:01am

There are a lot of people  posting  here making assumptions which only makes them look stupid.

14
Madkiwi
Posts
287
Joined
8/20/2018
Location
Auckland NZ
10/6/2023 2:38am
pdub187 wrote:

America is such a wild place.

Madkiwi wrote:
And they don't seem to see that. It's sad, a place that is so amazingly awesome and has so much coolness and yet so much scary...

And they don't seem to see that.

It's sad, a place that is so amazingly awesome and has so much coolness and yet so much scary stuff and is significantly out of step with the rest of the Western world.

 - Imagine how different it would be if it was like the rest of the world with almost no guns and tax-funded general health care.

No doubt down-voted or clipped, but just think of that last line just for a moment, and how it would impact your life for the better. I'd gladly discuss an outside perspective via message if anyone wants to.

GangGreen wrote:

Shot for trespassing - Not justified.   If the trail/ track is there and has been there Farmer J, it's not yours, even if you buy the land !!!

Shot for Physical Altercation - Always justified.


For us outside of the States, it is almost totally unfathomable that a citizen, security guard OR officer of any department of law can shoot an unarmed person and not be prosecuted for manslaughter.

Anyway, my sincere condolences to the family, for whatever reason, a tragic thing to go from going out to ride a dirt bike with your son for a bit of fun and family bonding to the father dying. Just sad.

FGR01 wrote:

I'm sure you'll find many stories to justify yourself BUT you're missing the point, on purpose, it seems. 

3
4
SlackBoy
Posts
90
Joined
9/12/2015
Location
NZ
10/6/2023 2:54am
Madkiwi wrote:
And they don't seem to see that. It's sad, a place that is so amazingly awesome and has so much coolness and yet so much scary...

And they don't seem to see that.

It's sad, a place that is so amazingly awesome and has so much coolness and yet so much scary stuff and is significantly out of step with the rest of the Western world.

 - Imagine how different it would be if it was like the rest of the world with almost no guns and tax-funded general health care.

No doubt down-voted or clipped, but just think of that last line just for a moment, and how it would impact your life for the better. I'd gladly discuss an outside perspective via message if anyone wants to.

GangGreen wrote:

Shot for trespassing - Not justified.   If the trail/ track is there and has been there Farmer J, it's not yours, even if you buy the land !!!

Shot for Physical Altercation - Always justified.


For us outside of the States, it is almost totally unfathomable that a citizen, security guard OR officer of any department of law can shoot an unarmed person and not be prosecuted for manslaughter.

Anyway, my sincere condolences to the family, for whatever reason, a tragic thing to go from going out to ride a dirt bike with your son for a bit of fun and family bonding to the father dying. Just sad.

FGR01 wrote:
Madkiwi wrote:

I'm sure you'll find many stories to justify yourself BUT you're missing the point, on purpose, it seems. 

He's prolly missing the fact that he had been ramming cars, including a police car and was off his tits on P (meth)

3
ARM670
Posts
2143
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH US
10/6/2023 3:23am

And in the mean time more land is being shut down to recreational use. So people then trespass "because I have always ridden there". But that doesn't help the matter. If you respect the laws, whether you agree or not, then you will be able to petition it and try to reopen them RESPONSIBLY.  And with all the crazys out there today you need to be carful. Not only do the police have to deal with them, but some of the police are the problems as well. Sad situation all the way around.

4
wwdiii
Posts
2541
Joined
4/15/2019
Location
League City, TX US
10/6/2023 3:32am
If you’re going to ride somewhere you’re not supposed to it’s probably best not to be an asshole when you’re confronted about it.    Not a...

If you’re going to ride somewhere you’re not supposed to it’s probably best not to be an asshole when you’re confronted about it. 
 

Not a good example of the “motocross community.” Sounds more like an inconsiderate douchebag being an asshole.

Inconsiderate douchebags being assholes don't deserve to be shot.

So are you saying inconsiderate douchebags being assholes has the right to inflict bodily harm on some one.  As in two on one.  Do you realize how many people die each year in countries around the world from blows to the head. Or knocked down causing a blow to the head.  Not as deadly as gun shot but people in this world were getting hurt and killed long before guns existed.  

2
10/6/2023 3:55am
If you’re going to ride somewhere you’re not supposed to it’s probably best not to be an asshole when you’re confronted about it.    Not a...

If you’re going to ride somewhere you’re not supposed to it’s probably best not to be an asshole when you’re confronted about it. 
 

Not a good example of the “motocross community.” Sounds more like an inconsiderate douchebag being an asshole.

Inconsiderate douchebags being assholes don't deserve to be shot.

wwdiii wrote:
So are you saying inconsiderate douchebags being assholes has the right to inflict bodily harm on some one.  As in two on one.  Do you realize...

So are you saying inconsiderate douchebags being assholes has the right to inflict bodily harm on some one.  As in two on one.  Do you realize how many people die each year in countries around the world from blows to the head. Or knocked down causing a blow to the head.  Not as deadly as gun shot but people in this world were getting hurt and killed long before guns existed.  

I didn't say that, I said...

"Inconsiderate douchebags being assholes don't deserve to be shot"

1
1
10/6/2023 4:06am Edited Date/Time 10/6/2023 4:11am
wwdiii wrote:
I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a...

I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a different set of laws and jurisdiction than private owned property.  Different laws, judges, law enforcement you name it.  I would guess in South African there are land/property owned by individuals and owned by the South African government.  Therefore law enforced by different entities if I had to guess.

I can’t say about a contract security guard on federal land providing security.  But a US federal law enforcement officer, federal Game warden or whoever federal are not to be fucked with.  They are the wrong bear to poke.  Same with trespassing.  Trespassing on federal land in this country is not always the smartest thing to do.  

With all that said, if you read the article it says being investigated by local law enforcement if I read it correctly.  Which kinda says the shooting was not on federal owned property.

I feel bad for this all families involved, a life was lost.  Then again rights is right and wrong is wrong.  It’ should be easier to march than fight, especially with someone with a gun.  

 

TbonesPop wrote:
Apply your logic to illegals crossing into Texas in Big Bend national park, which is federal land.  They are entering illegally and are trespassing.  Confrontations occur...

Apply your logic to illegals crossing into Texas in Big Bend national park, which is federal land.  They are entering illegally and are trespassing.  Confrontations occur daily.  Same rules still apply to everyone?  With respect to the incident that occurred, there simply isn't enough information to take any side IMHO.  I've seen dipshits riding dirtbikes at places they shouldn't have been and I've seen dipshit cops/LEO do stupid corrupt shit - or some that just make mistakes in the moment.  No one knows what happened.  And just because it was federal land doesn't mean anything, see first comment above.  

If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t shot at for trespassing.  Sounds like they were shot at for getting into a confrontation with an armed guard.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

7
3
TalinH112
Posts
1411
Joined
1/30/2022
Location
Belgrade, MT US
10/6/2023 4:24am
PhunnyGuy wrote:
yes you can have a stand your ground law. this is an affirmative defense, but now you have a burden shift. The burden is on the...

yes you can have a stand your ground law. this is an affirmative defense, but now you have a burden shift. The burden is on the security guard in this case to prove that a reasonable person would believe he is in imminent danger of death or severe injury. Stand your ground almost never justifies shooting an attacker with bare hands.

FGR01 wrote:
Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are...

Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are irrelevant.   This appears to not be a case of a crazy private property owner over reacting.  This appears to be a case of a Federal Agent protecting federal property/critical infrastructure.  If you are not familiar with the Federal laws pertaining to trespassing on federal property/critical infrastructure or the Rules of engagement that Federal Officers have to protect that, you really should not comment.

Uh .. are they going to guard every transmission right of way Bonneville owns ?  I ride Sadie creek dnr OHV trail it runs under Bonneville...

Uh .. are they going to guard every transmission right of way Bonneville owns ? 

I ride Sadie creek dnr OHV trail it runs under Bonneville 138kv lines for miles,  no one's guarding them. No problems

Also they have a national at washougal and there are two 230kv bonneville lines running through there. 

What a joke.

They can replace transmission lines in a matter of hours. Transformers, capacitors and all the other equipment it takes to make sure those transmission lines do their job are very expensive and even worse are unavailable due to America shipping all our production of such assets to China. The backlog for such parts is measured in Years, you’re blissfully unaware of how fragile our power grid is.

3
3
wwdiii
Posts
2541
Joined
4/15/2019
Location
League City, TX US
10/6/2023 4:29am
wwdiii wrote:
I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a...

I can’t give you the answer you want but here is the difference in simple terms.  Federal owned land and private owned lands fall under a different set of laws and jurisdiction than private owned property.  Different laws, judges, law enforcement you name it.  I would guess in South African there are land/property owned by individuals and owned by the South African government.  Therefore law enforced by different entities if I had to guess.

I can’t say about a contract security guard on federal land providing security.  But a US federal law enforcement officer, federal Game warden or whoever federal are not to be fucked with.  They are the wrong bear to poke.  Same with trespassing.  Trespassing on federal land in this country is not always the smartest thing to do.  

With all that said, if you read the article it says being investigated by local law enforcement if I read it correctly.  Which kinda says the shooting was not on federal owned property.

I feel bad for this all families involved, a life was lost.  Then again rights is right and wrong is wrong.  It’ should be easier to march than fight, especially with someone with a gun.  

 

TbonesPop wrote:
Apply your logic to illegals crossing into Texas in Big Bend national park, which is federal land.  They are entering illegally and are trespassing.  Confrontations occur...

Apply your logic to illegals crossing into Texas in Big Bend national park, which is federal land.  They are entering illegally and are trespassing.  Confrontations occur daily.  Same rules still apply to everyone?  With respect to the incident that occurred, there simply isn't enough information to take any side IMHO.  I've seen dipshits riding dirtbikes at places they shouldn't have been and I've seen dipshit cops/LEO do stupid corrupt shit - or some that just make mistakes in the moment.  No one knows what happened.  And just because it was federal land doesn't mean anything, see first comment above.  

If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t...

If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t shot at for trespassing.  Sounds like they were shot at for getting into a confrontation with an armed guard.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Smartest thing said in this whole discussion.  Shots weren’t fired over trespassing.  Shots were fired over a physical altercation.  The facts aren’t out to the public of what transpired.  Chances are after 6 days law enforcement probably know what happened.  

1
1
MxAddic
Posts
5308
Joined
11/24/2022
Location
NY US
10/6/2023 5:09am
lostboy819 wrote:

Quit talking like this" child" was 5 years old. Must have been big enough and old enough to throw down.

Sounds more like tuff guy rent a pig went hands on with the kid. When Dad jumped in chickensh!t pulled his piece and capped them both.

Makes a lot more sense than 2 folks acting out of character jumping the guy.

2
22
10/6/2023 5:32am
Gmyersdork wrote:
Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I...

Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I and my children abide by. Dont ride your legally obtained dirtbike on my property, unless you ask. Its actually easy

Or what?

13
TalinH112
Posts
1411
Joined
1/30/2022
Location
Belgrade, MT US
10/6/2023 5:45am
Gmyersdork wrote:
Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I...

Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I and my children abide by. Dont ride your legally obtained dirtbike on my property, unless you ask. Its actually easy

Or what?

It’s this kinda attitude that gets people who trespass shot. 

11
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
10/6/2023 5:48am
Gmyersdork wrote:
Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I...

Don't trespass, than it's never an issue. Dont ride your illegally obtained dirt bike up and down my street without care to the laws that I and my children abide by. Dont ride your legally obtained dirtbike on my property, unless you ask. Its actually easy

Or what?

Ever heard the saying. ,stupid games stupid prizes? 

3
3
wwdiii
Posts
2541
Joined
4/15/2019
Location
League City, TX US
10/6/2023 6:06am

Let’s say this was posted in non moto section.  What if the two people shot with one ending in fatality were not part of the dirt bike community, never owned a dirt bike.   The security guard didn’t pull them over for riding a dirt bike/trespassing.  They were pulled over for backing up to no trespassing sign and dumped an old washing machine a car battery and 13 gallon kitchen trash bag full of shitty baby diapers.  A heated argument and physical altercation took place.  Security Gaurd felt his life was threatened and used his firearm.  If I had to guess and it’s just a guess.  Comments might be  like…..who would want to take a chance and get shot over dumping trash on federal land.  

3
1
MxAddic
Posts
5308
Joined
11/24/2022
Location
NY US
10/6/2023 6:13am Edited Date/Time 10/6/2023 6:13am
If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t...

If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t shot at for trespassing.  Sounds like they were shot at for getting into a confrontation with an armed guard.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

I would say the guard confronted them. Vital sure has a strange way of twisting things. I maybe missed the part that says they initiated the altercation. Probably because that didn't happen.

1
14
Farmer J
Posts
978
Joined
11/26/2022
Location
Steelville, MO US
10/6/2023 6:16am
If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t...

If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t shot at for trespassing.  Sounds like they were shot at for getting into a confrontation with an armed guard.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

MxAddic wrote:
I would say the guard confronted them. Vital sure has a strange way of twisting things. I maybe missed the part that says they initiated the...

I would say the guard confronted them. Vital sure has a strange way of twisting things. I maybe missed the part that says they initiated the altercation. Probably because that didn't happen.

That's what happens when you're someplace you shouldn't be. You get confronted. 

9
1
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
10/6/2023 6:17am
If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t...

If the illegals confronted the border patrol agents like these guys reportedly did, you better believe their chances of getting shot would increase.  These guys weren’t shot at for trespassing.  Sounds like they were shot at for getting into a confrontation with an armed guard.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

MxAddic wrote:
I would say the guard confronted them. Vital sure has a strange way of twisting things. I maybe missed the part that says they initiated the...

I would say the guard confronted them. Vital sure has a strange way of twisting things. I maybe missed the part that says they initiated the altercation. Probably because that didn't happen.

Farmer J wrote:

That's what happens when you're someplace you shouldn't be. You get confronted. 

Exactly, not that hard to understand.

3
wwdiii
Posts
2541
Joined
4/15/2019
Location
League City, TX US
10/6/2023 6:28am
lostboy819 wrote:

Quit talking like this" child" was 5 years old. Must have been big enough and old enough to throw down.

MxAddic wrote:
Sounds more like tuff guy rent a pig went hands on with the kid. When Dad jumped in chickensh!t pulled his piece and capped them both...

Sounds more like tuff guy rent a pig went hands on with the kid. When Dad jumped in chickensh!t pulled his piece and capped them both.

Makes a lot more sense than 2 folks acting out of character jumping the guy.

Rent a pig throwing down might not be accurate.

Cut and Paste,

According to SCSO, the incident started when the two men were contacted by an armed security person for trespassing on the Bonneville Power Administration, which is federal land. SCSO said the area was "clearly marked by signage."

Security and the two men eventually made contact with each other and "a heated verbal exchange" started. It then escalated into a physical fight between security and one of the men. The second man got involved in the physical altercation with security.

Witnesses to the altercation told investigators the two men appeared to be aggressive or actually fighting with security. At some point, security fired his weapon and hit the two men.

One of the men was taken to the hospital, where he is still receiving treatment. The other man was pronounced dead at the scene.

6
FGR01
Posts
6036
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
AZ US
Fantasy
10/6/2023 6:29am
Madkiwi wrote:
And they don't seem to see that. It's sad, a place that is so amazingly awesome and has so much coolness and yet so much scary...

And they don't seem to see that.

It's sad, a place that is so amazingly awesome and has so much coolness and yet so much scary stuff and is significantly out of step with the rest of the Western world.

 - Imagine how different it would be if it was like the rest of the world with almost no guns and tax-funded general health care.

No doubt down-voted or clipped, but just think of that last line just for a moment, and how it would impact your life for the better. I'd gladly discuss an outside perspective via message if anyone wants to.

GangGreen wrote:

Shot for trespassing - Not justified.   If the trail/ track is there and has been there Farmer J, it's not yours, even if you buy the land !!!

Shot for Physical Altercation - Always justified.


For us outside of the States, it is almost totally unfathomable that a citizen, security guard OR officer of any department of law can shoot an unarmed person and not be prosecuted for manslaughter.

Anyway, my sincere condolences to the family, for whatever reason, a tragic thing to go from going out to ride a dirt bike with your son for a bit of fun and family bonding to the father dying. Just sad.

FGR01 wrote:
Madkiwi wrote:

I'm sure you'll find many stories to justify yourself BUT you're missing the point, on purpose, it seems. 

Yes, you are right.  That is what I did.  I cherry picked one story to create a straw man argument.  I was purposely being ridiculous to show you how ridiculous what you're implying about the US is.  We don't have cops over here running around crazy just killing people with impunity like people try to make out.  

4
3

Post a reply to: Washington Rider Shot and Killed

The Latest