Lorretta Lynn’s class restructure

ElliotB16
Posts
1122
Joined
6/10/2019
Location
Cairo, GA US
8/10/2023 11:02am

Imagine a football team being national champions in the C level group.

Things won’t change as long as Loretta’s is a big money maker 

7
1
JustMX
Posts
5230
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TN US
8/10/2023 11:06am
loftyair wrote:

Don't tell them how much more money they would make with D, E, and F classes!

They actually tried “beginner” classes about 10 years ago and did not have he participation they must have hoped for.

OwenJakes
Posts
1642
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY US
8/10/2023 11:09am

'Top C Riders' really are just too insecure to race B.

12
ProKawi24
Posts
2120
Joined
2/20/2018
Location
Herald, CA US
8/10/2023 1:30pm

Last I was racing I always raced 85 7-11 & Supermini. Then my last year I think it was 85 12-13 or 12-16 and Supermini.  Some places just went A,B,C instead of age groups but nowadays I see like 8-10 different 85cc type classes it's insane. 

I rode the same bike in both classes. Some guys had a special "supermini" bike but my Dad thought it would make me faster riding against bigger bikes anyways.  Even with a bunch of sponsor help it was crazy expensive to keep 1 bike in perfect condition, I don't know how the hell those guys could do both and they were usually the ones pulling up with a massive RV and trailer behind it. 

 

The Shop

2-slow MX
Posts
57
Joined
10/13/2022
Location
Clermont, FL US
8/10/2023 1:40pm

Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never been to LL before.  Nothing wrong with having a class to see who the fastest new comer to the national scene is. 

But to get to my point here, everyone is telling a 14-15 year old kid that just got on a 250 a few months ago, is new to the national scene, and has never even been to LL that - The fair thing to do is line up against Casey Cochran, who literally runs pro level speeds on his full blown factory Husky bike.  They're supposed to be banging bars with Logan Best and Gavin Towers on their factory Yamaha bikes. Or Drew Adams on his Factory Kawasaki.  I mean i can make an entire list here.  I mean seriously, Casey literally just won Schoolboy 2.  That class is a fucking B/C class.  A full blown factory rider who will be competing for podiums in supercross in a few months is literally allowed to race against C riders.  I wonder why that 15 year old didn't just jump in there with the sharks... 

Fast as shit C class riders ain't the problem.  That is what we call a symptom of the problem. 

I stand by my statement that the classes we have are fine.  Requirements/stipulations for said classes are broken...

We just had multiple guys who have "qualified" for Loretta's line up in C class.  They just didn't race it for whatever reason previously.

A kid with multiple Arenacross National titles raced C class.

B class and B/C classes are full of Full blown Factory riders.

A class is full of pro level riders that are just hanging around hoping to get picked up for a factory deal.

 

7
5
8/10/2023 1:48pm
Listened to Weege’s pod yesterday, and I couldn’t agree more with his point about the classes being all fucked up these days. There is way too...

Listened to Weege’s pod yesterday, and I couldn’t agree more with his point about the classes being all fucked up these days. There is way too many of them, they separate the talent so much that we really have no idea who the best is at any level at the ranch anymore. IMO we need to cut a bunch of them, forcing the talent to show what they can do against different aged riders and on different sized bikes. For example, if there was only 1 Mini Sr class, 1 super mini, and 1 125 schoolboy, then those riders wouldn’t be able to specialize on 1 bike and race the exact same guys in 2 classes. Some guys would race a 85 and supermini, or a supermini and 125, or maybe even a 125 against 250fs in the schoolboy 2 class as well. Here’s what I came up with:

1-4. Keep the 50s the same I think they have that part right.  

5-6. 65 7-9 & 65 10-11 only need 2, if jr is fast enough he can also race 85 or a 50 if he’s that young.

7-9. 85 9-11, 85 11-13, Mini Sr. 12-15 kids can race different age groups instead of the same age group in a stock, then a mod class. I’d allow big wheels in Mini Sr but still 85s only.

10. SUPERMINI 12-16 No not 1 or 2, just freakin supermini. This is the one class where you can run a big bore 85, can not pigeon hole into being a supermini specialist. If they want to do this they’ll have to race another bike in another class as well if you’re doing 2.

11-12. 125 C and Schoolboy 1 I understand the need for some beginner classes. But we’re eliminating 125 bc 12-17, it’s the exact same thing as schoolboy 1. Now, if you wanna race your 125 twice you’ll have to do it against 4 strokes or hop on a 250f in another class.

13-14. Girls 11-16 & WMX they have these right 

15. schoolboy 2 great class, hopefully we’d get some top 125 guys like wood and robbins this year to mix it up more

16-17. 250 & 450 C we do not need endless amounts of C classes. I get it sometimes a C rider does make it to pro, but it’s rare. With these 2 and 125 C they still have plenty of options. Eliminate the 250 C junior as well it just promotes sandbagging.

18-19 250 & 450 B the younger guys have schoolboy and the older ones have college so they still have options, just not SO many options so that they can’t hide from competition anymore. Also I’d make a rule that if you get top 10 overall in one of these 2 you are moved up to A.

20. college 17-24 no change

21-22. 250 & 450 A/pro sport no change

23. + 25 Here’s where I think big change needs to happen, guys like Keefer and Riddle should not get lumped in with the Browns of the world because they accomplished the huge goal of scoring a couple of points in their pro career. So I’d make a 100 point rule, if you scored that many in a career, you were a legit pro. Therefore the only vet class you are eligible for is +25. Wanna do a 2nd class? Race 250 or 450 PRO sport.

24.  +30 sportsman. Make it so you’re ineligible for this class if you’ve ever made the fast 40. This is for guys who didn’t make it to pro, but are still fast. But sorry +45 guys with the rule change your class isn’t really needed anymore.

25-26. +40 &+50 Call em the Keefer classes. As long as you scored less than 100 points you’re eligible.

This structure tightens everyone up. No more hiding. You wanna show up to the ranch? Get ready for some competition no more trophy hunting. If DC can’t handle the financial loss, allow 80 guys in certain classes to qualify out of regionals and make the first motos a qualifier.

 

All comes down to the money. The more riders/classes the more mulah.Cool

1
2
8/10/2023 1:49pm
2-slow MX wrote:
Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never...

Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never been to LL before.  Nothing wrong with having a class to see who the fastest new comer to the national scene is. 

But to get to my point here, everyone is telling a 14-15 year old kid that just got on a 250 a few months ago, is new to the national scene, and has never even been to LL that - The fair thing to do is line up against Casey Cochran, who literally runs pro level speeds on his full blown factory Husky bike.  They're supposed to be banging bars with Logan Best and Gavin Towers on their factory Yamaha bikes. Or Drew Adams on his Factory Kawasaki.  I mean i can make an entire list here.  I mean seriously, Casey literally just won Schoolboy 2.  That class is a fucking B/C class.  A full blown factory rider who will be competing for podiums in supercross in a few months is literally allowed to race against C riders.  I wonder why that 15 year old didn't just jump in there with the sharks... 

Fast as shit C class riders ain't the problem.  That is what we call a symptom of the problem. 

I stand by my statement that the classes we have are fine.  Requirements/stipulations for said classes are broken...

We just had multiple guys who have "qualified" for Loretta's line up in C class.  They just didn't race it for whatever reason previously.

A kid with multiple Arenacross National titles raced C class.

B class and B/C classes are full of Full blown Factory riders.

A class is full of pro level riders that are just hanging around hoping to get picked up for a factory deal.

 

One of the C class winners this year raced Loretta's on a 50cc

Didn't think you could do that.

oceantrav
Posts
951
Joined
10/20/2015
Location
Tarpon Springs, FL US
8/10/2023 2:10pm
2-slow MX wrote:
Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never...

Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never been to LL before.  Nothing wrong with having a class to see who the fastest new comer to the national scene is. 

But to get to my point here, everyone is telling a 14-15 year old kid that just got on a 250 a few months ago, is new to the national scene, and has never even been to LL that - The fair thing to do is line up against Casey Cochran, who literally runs pro level speeds on his full blown factory Husky bike.  They're supposed to be banging bars with Logan Best and Gavin Towers on their factory Yamaha bikes. Or Drew Adams on his Factory Kawasaki.  I mean i can make an entire list here.  I mean seriously, Casey literally just won Schoolboy 2.  That class is a fucking B/C class.  A full blown factory rider who will be competing for podiums in supercross in a few months is literally allowed to race against C riders.  I wonder why that 15 year old didn't just jump in there with the sharks... 

Fast as shit C class riders ain't the problem.  That is what we call a symptom of the problem. 

I stand by my statement that the classes we have are fine.  Requirements/stipulations for said classes are broken...

We just had multiple guys who have "qualified" for Loretta's line up in C class.  They just didn't race it for whatever reason previously.

A kid with multiple Arenacross National titles raced C class.

B class and B/C classes are full of Full blown Factory riders.

A class is full of pro level riders that are just hanging around hoping to get picked up for a factory deal.

 

LowBidder wrote:

One of the C class winners this year raced Loretta's on a 50cc

Didn't think you could do that.

You can race 50cc 4-6 and then race C class

 

you can’t Race 50cc 7-8 and then race C class though.

2-slow MX
Posts
57
Joined
10/13/2022
Location
Clermont, FL US
8/10/2023 2:24pm
2-slow MX wrote:
Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never...

Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never been to LL before.  Nothing wrong with having a class to see who the fastest new comer to the national scene is. 

But to get to my point here, everyone is telling a 14-15 year old kid that just got on a 250 a few months ago, is new to the national scene, and has never even been to LL that - The fair thing to do is line up against Casey Cochran, who literally runs pro level speeds on his full blown factory Husky bike.  They're supposed to be banging bars with Logan Best and Gavin Towers on their factory Yamaha bikes. Or Drew Adams on his Factory Kawasaki.  I mean i can make an entire list here.  I mean seriously, Casey literally just won Schoolboy 2.  That class is a fucking B/C class.  A full blown factory rider who will be competing for podiums in supercross in a few months is literally allowed to race against C riders.  I wonder why that 15 year old didn't just jump in there with the sharks... 

Fast as shit C class riders ain't the problem.  That is what we call a symptom of the problem. 

I stand by my statement that the classes we have are fine.  Requirements/stipulations for said classes are broken...

We just had multiple guys who have "qualified" for Loretta's line up in C class.  They just didn't race it for whatever reason previously.

A kid with multiple Arenacross National titles raced C class.

B class and B/C classes are full of Full blown Factory riders.

A class is full of pro level riders that are just hanging around hoping to get picked up for a factory deal.

 

LowBidder wrote:

One of the C class winners this year raced Loretta's on a 50cc

Didn't think you could do that.

oceantrav wrote:

You can race 50cc 4-6 and then race C class

 

you can’t Race 50cc 7-8 and then race C class though.

MX sports rule book now says:

a. Participated at the National in any previous year in any class, with the exception of any Micro, Girls or Youth Beginner (2011) class, as well as any Women Amateur class racers finishing outside of the top 10.

Micro 3 is the 50 (7-8) class.  I thought back in the day it was only 4-6 shaft class but now it's any 50 class i guess.

I mean i think that's probably a fair rule though.  Way bigger issues than that, to me.

2
109
Posts
471
Joined
4/2/2012
Location
Murrieta, CA US
8/10/2023 2:28pm
2-slow MX wrote:
Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never...

Crazy how everyone is dogging on C class and saying they're really B riders.  No shit.  But to race C class you have to have never been to LL before.  Nothing wrong with having a class to see who the fastest new comer to the national scene is. 

But to get to my point here, everyone is telling a 14-15 year old kid that just got on a 250 a few months ago, is new to the national scene, and has never even been to LL that - The fair thing to do is line up against Casey Cochran, who literally runs pro level speeds on his full blown factory Husky bike.  They're supposed to be banging bars with Logan Best and Gavin Towers on their factory Yamaha bikes. Or Drew Adams on his Factory Kawasaki.  I mean i can make an entire list here.  I mean seriously, Casey literally just won Schoolboy 2.  That class is a fucking B/C class.  A full blown factory rider who will be competing for podiums in supercross in a few months is literally allowed to race against C riders.  I wonder why that 15 year old didn't just jump in there with the sharks... 

Fast as shit C class riders ain't the problem.  That is what we call a symptom of the problem. 

I stand by my statement that the classes we have are fine.  Requirements/stipulations for said classes are broken...

We just had multiple guys who have "qualified" for Loretta's line up in C class.  They just didn't race it for whatever reason previously.

A kid with multiple Arenacross National titles raced C class.

B class and B/C classes are full of Full blown Factory riders.

A class is full of pro level riders that are just hanging around hoping to get picked up for a factory deal.

 

LowBidder wrote:

One of the C class winners this year raced Loretta's on a 50cc

Didn't think you could do that.

65 class and up

1
8/10/2023 2:35pm

Gotcha

8/10/2023 2:50pm
OwenJakes wrote:

'Top C Riders' really are just too insecure to race B.

Yup. Especially down here in SoCal. Go to any swap race or local Perris race and the b class has about 4 dudes in it, I’m one of them. It’s all just working dudes on the line and they line us up with pro. There’s a max 12 guys on the gate ha. Novice motos( C class) come around and there’s kids with race bikes and dads with head sets and pit boards and the gate is full. Funny thing is the sandbaggers racing novice because they’re doing C class at Loretta would benefit from racing with the pros. But C class W’s at the local race look better on the insta post tagging all the companies that give them 25% off 

7
Falcon
Posts
12168
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA US
8/10/2023 2:57pm

C class championships are legit to me, as long as every competitor is moved to B the next season. 

+25 makes very little sense to me. Don't get me wrong; I cleaned up in +25 Intermediate back in the day (not at Loretta's,) but even then I thought it was a little weird. 

4
2
dcg141
Posts
2306
Joined
11/30/2009
Location
MS US
8/10/2023 3:16pm

C class need to go away completely because there is no way to police that class.  There also needs to be a movement to push riders back to local racing and that would help. I agree also supermini needs to be big wheel 85. Its time for 60+ and full gate 50+ if they need to keep the numbers.

5
4
mb60
Posts
5562
Joined
3/7/2010
Location
GRAPEVINE, TX US
8/10/2023 4:17pm

I just want to see a vet plus 40 class is all I ask. I want to see 30-40 former pros get after it for 3 Motos. 

1
1
motomind132
Posts
281
Joined
5/12/2023
Location
Chicago , IL US
8/10/2023 4:47pm
McG194 wrote:
I take it you've never seen a C class Loretta's kid? A while back I was at my local track (Pax in Fl) on a practice...

I take it you've never seen a C class Loretta's kid? A while back I was at my local track (Pax in Fl) on a practice day I was out doing my laps and noticed a kid that was ripping. After about 5 laps I pulled off by the grandstands because I wanted to check this kid out from an elevated position. I see someone timing him. Turns out it was his dad, and the kid was a LL's C class champion. Any of us that ride dirt bikes know when we see talent and it was obvious the kid had pro potential even though he had just got out of the C class a couple months before. For anyone thinking it's not worth having a C class there, exhibit A should be Jeremy McGrath. 

TDeath21 wrote:

I mean if a kid is impressing you that much like you said he did … He probably shouldn’t be in the C Class. Lol. 

oceantrav wrote:
I don’t follow the C class, but I would guess the top 10 plus kids in the C class would have qualified in the B class...

I don’t follow the C class, but I would guess the top 10 plus kids in the C class would have qualified in the B class. Which makes the C class even more pointless.

I’m sure when McGrath raced the C class, he could have qualified for the B class

C class guys at my area quali at byron top 7 would have put themselves 2nd Thur 8th in 250 A and pro sport and pushed 2nd thru 8th down to 9th+.

2
2-slow MX
Posts
57
Joined
10/13/2022
Location
Clermont, FL US
8/10/2023 5:21pm
dcg141 wrote:
C class need to go away completely because there is no way to police that class.  There also needs to be a movement to push riders...

C class need to go away completely because there is no way to police that class.  There also needs to be a movement to push riders back to local racing and that would help. I agree also supermini needs to be big wheel 85. Its time for 60+ and full gate 50+ if they need to keep the numbers.

I mean you you didn't even play around.  You just went straight for the dumbest post of the day award.  I like it!

1
mx 219
Posts
4033
Joined
8/15/2010
Location
South Central, PA US
8/10/2023 6:13pm
Listened to Weege’s pod yesterday, and I couldn’t agree more with his point about the classes being all fucked up these days. There is way too...

Listened to Weege’s pod yesterday, and I couldn’t agree more with his point about the classes being all fucked up these days. There is way too many of them, they separate the talent so much that we really have no idea who the best is at any level at the ranch anymore. IMO we need to cut a bunch of them, forcing the talent to show what they can do against different aged riders and on different sized bikes. For example, if there was only 1 Mini Sr class, 1 super mini, and 1 125 schoolboy, then those riders wouldn’t be able to specialize on 1 bike and race the exact same guys in 2 classes. Some guys would race a 85 and supermini, or a supermini and 125, or maybe even a 125 against 250fs in the schoolboy 2 class as well. Here’s what I came up with:

1-4. Keep the 50s the same I think they have that part right.  

5-6. 65 7-9 & 65 10-11 only need 2, if jr is fast enough he can also race 85 or a 50 if he’s that young.

7-9. 85 9-11, 85 11-13, Mini Sr. 12-15 kids can race different age groups instead of the same age group in a stock, then a mod class. I’d allow big wheels in Mini Sr but still 85s only.

10. SUPERMINI 12-16 No not 1 or 2, just freakin supermini. This is the one class where you can run a big bore 85, can not pigeon hole into being a supermini specialist. If they want to do this they’ll have to race another bike in another class as well if you’re doing 2.

11-12. 125 C and Schoolboy 1 I understand the need for some beginner classes. But we’re eliminating 125 bc 12-17, it’s the exact same thing as schoolboy 1. Now, if you wanna race your 125 twice you’ll have to do it against 4 strokes or hop on a 250f in another class.

13-14. Girls 11-16 & WMX they have these right 

15. schoolboy 2 great class, hopefully we’d get some top 125 guys like wood and robbins this year to mix it up more

16-17. 250 & 450 C we do not need endless amounts of C classes. I get it sometimes a C rider does make it to pro, but it’s rare. With these 2 and 125 C they still have plenty of options. Eliminate the 250 C junior as well it just promotes sandbagging.

18-19 250 & 450 B the younger guys have schoolboy and the older ones have college so they still have options, just not SO many options so that they can’t hide from competition anymore. Also I’d make a rule that if you get top 10 overall in one of these 2 you are moved up to A.

20. college 17-24 no change

21-22. 250 & 450 A/pro sport no change

23. + 25 Here’s where I think big change needs to happen, guys like Keefer and Riddle should not get lumped in with the Browns of the world because they accomplished the huge goal of scoring a couple of points in their pro career. So I’d make a 100 point rule, if you scored that many in a career, you were a legit pro. Therefore the only vet class you are eligible for is +25. Wanna do a 2nd class? Race 250 or 450 PRO sport.

24.  +30 sportsman. Make it so you’re ineligible for this class if you’ve ever made the fast 40. This is for guys who didn’t make it to pro, but are still fast. But sorry +45 guys with the rule change your class isn’t really needed anymore.

25-26. +40 &+50 Call em the Keefer classes. As long as you scored less than 100 points you’re eligible.

This structure tightens everyone up. No more hiding. You wanna show up to the ranch? Get ready for some competition no more trophy hunting. If DC can’t handle the financial loss, allow 80 guys in certain classes to qualify out of regionals and make the first motos a qualifier.

 

Why does 1 race determine who the best racers are? They should probably have a series of 3 rounds (7-9 motos) for the best 42 racers.

Other than that I agree. Make less classes.

2
1
JW40
Posts
7
Joined
8/20/2019
Location
IN US
8/10/2023 6:43pm

Want to fix the C Class?   WHEELS ON THE GROUND.   

3
4
cable
Posts
1240
Joined
6/11/2008
Location
Rockford, MI US
8/10/2023 8:31pm

Number backgrounds should have to be a certain color for locals and nationals.   Pink for C class.  Yellow for B class.  White or black for A class.    Incentive for kids to move up.  (Looking cool with the A rider plate. 

5
109
Posts
471
Joined
4/2/2012
Location
Murrieta, CA US
8/10/2023 8:54pm
cable wrote:
Number backgrounds should have to be a certain color for locals and nationals.   Pink for C class.  Yellow for B class.  White or black for...

Number backgrounds should have to be a certain color for locals and nationals.   Pink for C class.  Yellow for B class.  White or black for A class.    Incentive for kids to move up.  (Looking cool with the A rider plate. 

Vet sportsman should have rainbow colored plates. 

5
8/10/2023 8:55pm

Y’all get way to butt hurt about never making Loretta’s and needing everything to change to make it. Y’all took what the OP was trying to do and made this thread a joke. 

2
5
8/10/2023 9:00pm
ML512 wrote:
I know there are a couple of people inside OEM and amateur programs that would like to see Supermini classes go away, and just replace them...

I know there are a couple of people inside OEM and amateur programs that would like to see Supermini classes go away, and just replace them with 85 big wheels. We're the only one that really races Superminis, they don't bother with it in Europe, or other major country series. They're very, very expensive to operate and practice on. It's near impossible to fund running a year on them unless you have serious help.

I was talking to the dad of one of the Supermini title kids and he mentioned they were lucky to get 10 hours out of a Supermini all year, and that's the class they focused on all year.

FGR01 wrote:
"a couple of people inside OEM and amateur programs that would like to see Supermini classes go away" - those people were probably not Austrian.. lol...

"a couple of people inside OEM and amateur programs that would like to see Supermini classes go away" - those people were probably not Austrian.. lol

People only get 10 hrs on a Supermini because everyone of them thinks they absolutely have to have a full blown Lynks 112 engine in order to compete (3 of them for rotation, actually.. lol).   Most of them would be better off riding a bolt-on 105 most of the year and saving the 112 just for the big races.  The power difference is not as much as people like to make it out to be.  Oh, don't forget a pallet of MRX-02.  Have to have that also...Grinning

My old boss’s son rode Supermini’s back in 2011-2012, from what I remember they had 1 105 and 1 112. Testing them over multiple days at multiple tracks they ended up going 105 because the overall power delivery was better and it was more reliable than the 112. 

1
Phillip_Lamb
Posts
2049
Joined
12/14/2010
Location
ORANGEVALE, CA US
8/10/2023 10:28pm
oceantrav wrote:
Get rid of all C classes.    don’t underhand why there is vet classes at the amateur national either. Maybe have just 25+   maybe get...

Get rid of all C classes. 
 

don’t underhand why there is vet classes at the amateur national either. Maybe have just 25+

 

maybe get rid of the women classes too 

 

or just leave it the way it is. Never going to make everyone happy 

If you go to any national racing event, moto, bmx, rc cars etc. there classes for anyone who wants to be there from the young-old, fast-slow. Amatuer nationals, if anything are to bring together the community as a whole to enjoy the sport. sure, little johnny in the 250c will probably never even make local pro, but who cares.

the real problem is pretending loretta's is real litmus test for the next pro racers. SX futures and the MX combines fill this role and should be expanded into a pro am series with more events

7
tyler113
Posts
169
Joined
3/24/2011
Location
Fg, WI US
8/11/2023 2:55am
Dirt_Dawg wrote:
All comes down to the money. The more riders/classes the more mulah.

All comes down to the money. The more riders/classes the more mulah.Cool

Yup, I truly believe its that simple, and nothing anyone says will change my mind. This is capitalism, money over everything. Can I blame them? Not really, but it does take away from the entertainment factor. I'd definitely watch LL's if there were a lot less classes. 

Give the old guys their own race and make LL all about the up and comers. 

1
1
oceantrav
Posts
951
Joined
10/20/2015
Location
Tarpon Springs, FL US
8/11/2023 3:34am
oceantrav wrote:
Get rid of all C classes.    don’t underhand why there is vet classes at the amateur national either. Maybe have just 25+   maybe get...

Get rid of all C classes. 
 

don’t underhand why there is vet classes at the amateur national either. Maybe have just 25+

 

maybe get rid of the women classes too 

 

or just leave it the way it is. Never going to make everyone happy 

If you go to any national racing event, moto, bmx, rc cars etc. there classes for anyone who wants to be there from the young-old, fast-slow...

If you go to any national racing event, moto, bmx, rc cars etc. there classes for anyone who wants to be there from the young-old, fast-slow. Amatuer nationals, if anything are to bring together the community as a whole to enjoy the sport. sure, little johnny in the 250c will probably never even make local pro, but who cares.

the real problem is pretending loretta's is real litmus test for the next pro racers. SX futures and the MX combines fill this role and should be expanded into a pro am series with more events

If there’s a 250C class, then why not have a 65C class, and a 85C class. Maybe a super mini C class too? Maybe ad some D classes too 

 

see how stupid that sounds. 

B Gotti
Posts
363
Joined
7/24/2015
Location
Columbus, OH US
8/11/2023 4:01am

Don't forget Jeremy McGrath won the C class in 1987.

image-20230811070055-1

eddie
Posts
3020
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Bragg Creek, AB CA
8/11/2023 5:50am
GG121 wrote:
I think the vet classes hold an important place, because without that, you'd have fast older riders taking away top finishing positions from kids in A...

I think the vet classes hold an important place, because without that, you'd have fast older riders taking away top finishing positions from kids in A and B trying to compete for sponsors and rides in the pro ranks.

I see that as a good thing . 

LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID US
8/11/2023 8:36am
oceantrav wrote:
If there’s a 250C class, then why not have a 65C class, and a 85C class. Maybe a super mini C class too? Maybe ad some...

If there’s a 250C class, then why not have a 65C class, and a 85C class. Maybe a super mini C class too? Maybe ad some D classes too 

 

see how stupid that sounds. 

It doesn't sound as stupid as thinking that 25+ is a Vet class.

 

1
2-slow MX
Posts
57
Joined
10/13/2022
Location
Clermont, FL US
8/11/2023 1:37pm
oceantrav wrote:
Get rid of all C classes.    don’t underhand why there is vet classes at the amateur national either. Maybe have just 25+   maybe get...

Get rid of all C classes. 
 

don’t underhand why there is vet classes at the amateur national either. Maybe have just 25+

 

maybe get rid of the women classes too 

 

or just leave it the way it is. Never going to make everyone happy 

If you go to any national racing event, moto, bmx, rc cars etc. there classes for anyone who wants to be there from the young-old, fast-slow...

If you go to any national racing event, moto, bmx, rc cars etc. there classes for anyone who wants to be there from the young-old, fast-slow. Amatuer nationals, if anything are to bring together the community as a whole to enjoy the sport. sure, little johnny in the 250c will probably never even make local pro, but who cares.

the real problem is pretending loretta's is real litmus test for the next pro racers. SX futures and the MX combines fill this role and should be expanded into a pro am series with more events

oceantrav wrote:
If there’s a 250C class, then why not have a 65C class, and a 85C class. Maybe a super mini C class too? Maybe ad some...

If there’s a 250C class, then why not have a 65C class, and a 85C class. Maybe a super mini C class too? Maybe ad some D classes too 

 

see how stupid that sounds. 

Bro, by that logic there shouldn't be a B class either then... If all we care about is who is the fastest person on big bikes then get rid of all of the classes.  No Schoolboy, no B class, no vet/age classes... The reason there is no 50 thru Supermini B and C class is because there is a level of separation by age.  Once you hit big bikes it's any age (minus a few classes).  So there has to be something to break the people up to some extent.  So they just do it by skill/experience. 

Now i would be all for doing away with A,B, and C all together if they just created:

250 cc 12-17 (stock and mod)

250 cc 18-25 (stock and mod)

Pro Transition 1 & 2 Class: If you have any amount of factory support you automatically go into this class.  the very year you move off of Supermini you are in this class.  1 is the developmental class and 2 is the guys going pro in the next 2 years. Once you have been to LL more than twice in the above classes, you automatically move to this class. 

Now they're separated by a reasonable degree based on age still.  It still creates enough spots on the gate for guys and there is no way to Sandbag. 

The truth is they're just trying to create enough classes that there is something for literally everyone.  It's not about finding out who is going to be the next James Stewart to them.  To them this is simply a business and they're trying to capture every demographic there is.

Post a reply to: Lorretta Lynn’s class restructure

The Latest