The Deegan Bike Claim Story - Part 1, 2, and 3 | UPDATE: Brennan's Sponsor Responds | Schofield, Cotter, Burkeen, Deegan, Luce, and Walker

MX455
Posts
223
Joined
4/24/2009
Location
Tampa, FL US
8/17/2022 7:34am
Lasse wrote:
As much as I think it is unfortunate... Haiden should be penalized. I completely agree with the logic stated.
It's very unfortunate, He's very talented and doesn't need a bike advantage. However, penalizing the rider is the only real way to keep parents and sponsors in check.
9
Melicar
Posts
415
Joined
1/17/2013
Location
Sunny, CA US
8/17/2022 7:36am
ns503 wrote:
I don't think I've seen this floated. But there's a pile of verbal diarrhea on this for something to get missed in. Maybe the storm really...
I don't think I've seen this floated. But there's a pile of verbal diarrhea on this for something to get missed in.

Maybe the storm really took off from an initial call from the one with the most to lose, to his 'equal counterpart' on the 'other side'. I.e., Regan to Motoplex owner? Wouldn't that explain a lot of the talk and order of events that came after?
I was going to float the same thing I think you're saying.

My question after all of this that hasn't been brought up is the connection between the dealer and everyone. He's a Yamaha dealer. His son trains with Walker and presumably races a Yamaha. I don't know his age, class, or even how good he is. Since Deegan knew to tell Yamaha Don that Brennan trains with Walker, it wouldn't be a stretch to think since they are all connected that the Star camp could have reached out to the dealer. There may not have been threats of losing the Yamaha franchise but with a son racing and training with Walker a threat of "you'll never receive any help for your son in his potential career" is at least a plausible scenario. Take that as you will but seems reasonable to me for the dealer to be so upset he came back to town to "squash it".
7
Press516
Posts
5564
Joined
9/11/2018
Location
Gilbert, AZ US
Fantasy
8/17/2022 7:37am
The Yamaha side of this deal was exposed... Luce, and sponsor Chris for sure. Walker is a scumbag... Brian had no business in the deal, yet he injected himself in the debate. Cotter? Meh... Burkeen? Got most of it wrong.

Brennan? Got most of it right, although it appears not 100% truthful... Harris? Likely not truthful at all. BUT!!! And this is an important "but"... None of what Brennan or Harris embellished matters, they did it only make it seem less nefarious in their minds. The truth is, it wouldn't matter one bit if they came out and said they had been planning it for months, they raised the money together and they wanted to tear it down and expose it for all to see... The rule is the rule.

And the Yamaha crew is where the rules were broken. Brennan was bribed and coerced in to dropping the claim. The AMA has zero backbone and when guys like Burkeen have it completely wrong, you know nothing will be done.

BTW, I donated to Matt Burkeen and wish him the best of luck... I have nothing against any individuals other than the travesty to the sport that was witnessed in these events.
9
2
GrapeApe
Posts
8761
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
8/17/2022 7:51am
Gungadin wrote:
A short deck 2 ring piston and a 3mm longer arm could conceivably be fitted for 6 mm total stroke increase plus the industry standard +3...

A short deck 2 ring piston and a 3mm longer arm could conceivably be fitted for 6 mm total stroke increase plus the industry standard +3 mm big bore-up gives a handy 300cc and an easy 16:1 compression ratio.

I always wonder about the bassier tone of the Star Pro 250's.

Haha Just saying..
R66 wrote:
A longer rod does not increase the displacement. It will push up further, but not go down as far. Stroking a motor is done by offsetting...
A longer rod does not increase the displacement. It will push up further, but not go down as far. Stroking a motor is done by offsetting the crank pin further from the center of the crank.
Gungadin wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. The 'arm' is the stroke length. Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at...
Thanks for the heads up.

The 'arm' is the stroke length.

Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at each end.
I'm no motor expert, but this has totally stopped me down. Isn't stroke the distance the piston covers from bottom of its stroke to the top? So if you lower the deck of the piston and increase the length of the rod, with no changes to the crank, won't the piston travel the same length?

I thought lowering the piston and increasing rod length was more about reducing friction?
1
1

The Shop

Goofy Foot
Posts
279
Joined
5/1/2018
Location
SoCal, CA US
8/17/2022 7:53am
Q&A with Steve Matthes....Matthes questions are in bold:

Well, Brennan (who seems like a good kid), said in his initial video interview that his dealer (Chris from Motoplex) told him Yamaha said they were going to pull the dealers support and/or franchise if he went through with this claim. The dealer is saying did not say this.

It makes a lot of sense to a ton of people that there could have likely been a coalition between Walker and Luce to bully Brennan into changing his mind. Why the hell would Luce text Walker late at night and call him back to the track for an important meeting? If the Yamaha side was “ready to let the bike go” there would be no late night call to Walker to return to the track for a private meeting. Their coalition would have likely resulted in Walker telling the Dealer that Yamaha will pull support for his dealers if Brennan didn’t retract his claim. Walker obviously did the talking to keep Luce out of it, but used Luce’s presence as a threat to the Dealer. As a result, don’t you think it’s very possible that the Dealer told Brennan’s father they need to pull their claim for this reason (for fear of losing support from Yamaha)? If yes then Brennan isn’t lying, but instead relaying the information he learned from his Dad’s discussion with the Dealer. IMO, it would be very VERY likely for a Dealer to communicate this to the Dad during their private conversation. Why? Because it takes the Dealer’s opposing stance/opinions/emotion out of the equation and makes it a much more comfortable conversation to have with the Dad in order to justify the need for the claim to be removed. And just because you claim his Dealer said he didn’t say that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen…anyone of these guys can be bluffing, so maybe keep an open mind to both sides.

Brennen said that it was Cotter and Deegan with him in a room, we know now Mike from AMA was in there also.

There was a lot of talk from Cotter on the layout of the trailer. Isn’t it possible that the layout of the trailer had Brennan facing the direction of Cotter and Deegan but he didn’t see Burkeen had entered the room or was standing in the back corner listening? Regardless whether Burkeen was in the room or not, or in front of Brennan’s face or not, 3-5 minutes of this, or 6 minutes according to Cotter, is 6 minutes way too long. It shouldn’t have happened, at ALL. This is a huge violation. Cotter seemed to care a lot about whether Brennan’s engine builder was his Dad while talking outside, but he didn’t seem to care about Brennan’s age when he took him inside by himself. Cotter said something along the lines of “I thought he was 18”. Well, unfortunately in the real world where there’s accountability, he could be terminated for this assumption no matter how good of a guy he might be.

Brennen never mentioned the motors from Yamaha in his initial video interview, first time was to me. That seems rather important fact no?

Isn’t it more important that it’s known Brennan approached Yamaha earlier in the week about those motors but didn’t get any support. But then after Brennan claimed the bike he gets a special late night meeting with Yamaha and they roll out the red carpet (a.k.a bribe) right after being threatened by the interrogation team? Just because Walker was doing the yelling, doesn’t mean Luce wasn’t part of the strongarming. Luce said, “I let Matt take the lead”. So if Luce is sitting there, going along with all the threats and yelling and he didn't object in any way, then he’s part of the bullying team too. Also, does Yamaha give two motors to all amateurs who ask for them? You made it seem like Yamaha was doing such a good gesture by taking care of his motors. Why weren’t his motors taken care of before he made the claim?

To me, THE most effed up thing in this was Brennen saying that Yamaha was threatening this dealer..if true, that's absolutely terrible. Brennen admitted to me he didn't know WHO told his dealer that AND the dealer said no one from Yamaha said anything to him about that

Read above for a logical explanation of where that came from. It’s very likely that Walker was used as the conduit for the Yamaha strongarming.

Brennan, who again SHOULD have this bike, has not been consistent in his side of the story. That's 100% true.

It’s very easy for you to say 14 times “He should have the bike” when he doesn’t actually have the bike. FYI – it’s not making you appear to be neutral in this situation when you are completely blind to any form of bullying or coalition from the guys who pay some of your bills.

A couple more things. The fact that you discussed the beef between these two kids shows intent to bash his character and paint a bad picture for his motivation/intent. His motivation or intent is completely irrelevant.

Finally, you seem to question Brennan's credibility due to his age....well, how old was that kid you let join your show to bash Brennan (friend of the Deegan's coincidentally)? Why would you let such a young kid who's not credible due to his age come onto the show and bash another kid? Seems like you had it all planned out.
13
Camp332
Posts
8673
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Zoo Jersey US
8/17/2022 8:28am Edited Date/Time 8/17/2022 12:08pm
The next chapter begins.

New GoFundme by Brennan

EDIT: Campaign is no longer there. Link removed

5
Gary Duck
Posts
764
Joined
4/16/2019
Location
CA US
8/17/2022 8:32am
Camp332 wrote:
The next chapter begins.

New GoFundme by Brennan

EDIT: Campaign is no longer there. Link removed

If I was Deegan I'd make a decent contribution to this. Would be good PR for them considering the shitstorm this stems from...
7
1
R66
Posts
1235
Joined
4/16/2021
Location
Atlanta, GA US
8/17/2022 8:38am
Gungadin wrote:
A short deck 2 ring piston and a 3mm longer arm could conceivably be fitted for 6 mm total stroke increase plus the industry standard +3...

A short deck 2 ring piston and a 3mm longer arm could conceivably be fitted for 6 mm total stroke increase plus the industry standard +3 mm big bore-up gives a handy 300cc and an easy 16:1 compression ratio.

I always wonder about the bassier tone of the Star Pro 250's.

Haha Just saying..
R66 wrote:
A longer rod does not increase the displacement. It will push up further, but not go down as far. Stroking a motor is done by offsetting...
A longer rod does not increase the displacement. It will push up further, but not go down as far. Stroking a motor is done by offsetting the crank pin further from the center of the crank.
Gungadin wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. The 'arm' is the stroke length. Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at...
Thanks for the heads up.

The 'arm' is the stroke length.

Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at each end.
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
There is a reason they call them “stroker cranks.” The distance the piston moves up and down is determined by the offset of the big end of the rod from the center of the crank. The rod could be an inch longer and it would not change the displacement. You are confusing a “long rod” with a “stroker crank.” A long rod motor will have a different power characteristic because the longer rod, but it is still the same size motor.
5
GrapeApe
Posts
8761
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
8/17/2022 8:56am Edited Date/Time 8/17/2022 9:01am
Camp332 wrote:
The next chapter begins.

New GoFundme by Brennan

EDIT: Campaign is no longer there. Link removed

You have got to be fucking kidding me, what happened to his $17,500 cash? Wait, could it be . . . nah. That was his money that he earned changing tires.

I hope everyone that contributes to this sob story understand this kid has been living full time at a training facility for 3 years. Yes, a full year before he raced the C class at LL's he was living full time at a training facility. Not long ago this forum would have said this is the kind of thing that is wrong with amateur motocross. Now those same people will contribute to this half-assed panhandling.

Down vote away, this story sucks and its getting worse.
26
6
ns503
Posts
4555
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NS Toolies CA
8/17/2022 9:09am
Camp332 wrote:
The next chapter begins.

New GoFundme by Brennan

EDIT: Campaign is no longer there. Link removed

GrapeApe wrote:
You have got to be fucking kidding me, what happened to his $17,500 cash? Wait, could it be . . . nah. That was his money...
You have got to be fucking kidding me, what happened to his $17,500 cash? Wait, could it be . . . nah. That was his money that he earned changing tires.

I hope everyone that contributes to this sob story understand this kid has been living full time at a training facility for 3 years. Yes, a full year before he raced the C class at LL's he was living full time at a training facility. Not long ago this forum would have said this is the kind of thing that is wrong with amateur motocross. Now those same people will contribute to this half-assed panhandling.

Down vote away, this story sucks and its getting worse.
Well, he did lose his bikes. So there's that.

But looks like that isn't taking money any more?
2
1
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13040
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
8/17/2022 9:50am Edited Date/Time 8/17/2022 10:04am
If as Weege reports the father said that they would not claim the bike, this is over.
6
3
Fourth_Floor
Posts
978
Joined
7/13/2016
Location
Saint Marys, PA US
8/17/2022 10:13am
The interview with the Starr guy tells you all you need to know. The fact it will change their amateur bikes going forward and the fact...
The interview with the Starr guy tells you all you need to know. The fact it will change their amateur bikes going forward and the fact he thinks the other kids are on $40,000 bikes gives you an idea on what type of bike they had Haiden on. They 100% got caught with their pants down.

Let's be real though when it comes to Brennan's sponsor that allegedly got threatened. You really think he should've kissed his livelihood goodbye so some 17 year old kid could make Youtube videos shitting on the Deegans? That's crazy talk. The people saying that have absolutely no idea the years of hard work and money that goes into even getting a franchise like Yamaha. I would expect the guy to do exactly what he did which is talk the kid out of the claim, say very little publicly and cut all ties with the kid. You don't fuck with someone's livelihood, period.


aeffertz wrote:
How would Brennan claiming a bike ruin the livelihood of the dealer?
*if* the dealer was getting pressure from Yamaha to get his rider to drop the claim.
DonM
Posts
8386
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
Fantasy
8/17/2022 10:14am Edited Date/Time 8/17/2022 10:14am
If as Weege reports the father said that they would not claim the bike, this is over.
Yep....until the next Kooksey TMZ video now that he knows he can rile up the mob for his own benefit....
2
6
Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA US
8/17/2022 10:26am
Huckster wrote:
Insane! We are in deep trouble as a society. There is no longer a middle ground and reasoning with either side. You are either on the...
Insane! We are in deep trouble as a society. There is no longer a middle ground and reasoning with either side. You are either on the RED team or BLUE team and now this mentality has trickled down to AM Moto. It seems pretty simple.
AMA was going to allow the Claim. Dealer said he was never contacted by Yamaha. Dealer/Sponsor talked to kids Dad. Dad decided to rescind claim. End of story. Seems pretty simple. All the other stuff is minutia.
Yeah....because dealers NEVER lie. Especially one being threatened by the high up mucky-mucks.

Dealer delivered the killing blow by proxy of Yamaha.

I'd bet the farm on this.

9
4
GateDropGoGo
Posts
120
Joined
1/27/2022
Location
Redlands, CA US
8/17/2022 10:49am
Does Deegan's claimed/not claimed bike have an electric water pump?
8/17/2022 10:49am
R66 wrote:
A longer rod does not increase the displacement. It will push up further, but not go down as far. Stroking a motor is done by offsetting...
A longer rod does not increase the displacement. It will push up further, but not go down as far. Stroking a motor is done by offsetting the crank pin further from the center of the crank.
Gungadin wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. The 'arm' is the stroke length. Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at...
Thanks for the heads up.

The 'arm' is the stroke length.

Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at each end.
R66 wrote:
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong. There is a reason they call them “stroker cranks.” The distance the piston moves up and down...
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
There is a reason they call them “stroker cranks.” The distance the piston moves up and down is determined by the offset of the big end of the rod from the center of the crank. The rod could be an inch longer and it would not change the displacement. You are confusing a “long rod” with a “stroker crank.” A long rod motor will have a different power characteristic because the longer rod, but it is still the same size motor.
Yes, a long rod motor will also have a custom piston to have the wrist pin higher so the piston does not crash into the
head or valves. And it does change the characteristics of the engine. But it does not change the distance from TDC to BDC.
TM
4
8/17/2022 11:04am Edited Date/Time 8/17/2022 11:05am
The interview with the Starr guy tells you all you need to know. The fact it will change their amateur bikes going forward and the fact...
The interview with the Starr guy tells you all you need to know. The fact it will change their amateur bikes going forward and the fact he thinks the other kids are on $40,000 bikes gives you an idea on what type of bike they had Haiden on. They 100% got caught with their pants down.

Let's be real though when it comes to Brennan's sponsor that allegedly got threatened. You really think he should've kissed his livelihood goodbye so some 17 year old kid could make Youtube videos shitting on the Deegans? That's crazy talk. The people saying that have absolutely no idea the years of hard work and money that goes into even getting a franchise like Yamaha. I would expect the guy to do exactly what he did which is talk the kid out of the claim, say very little publicly and cut all ties with the kid. You don't fuck with someone's livelihood, period.


aeffertz wrote:
How would Brennan claiming a bike ruin the livelihood of the dealer?
Exaclty. It wouldn't at all, or even have anything to do with him -- unless there were repercussions from Yamaha/Star.
3
ctbale
Posts
1098
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
Gustavus, AK US
8/17/2022 11:05am
MX455 wrote:
Its interesting that everyone is caught up on Walker and the Sponsor. None of them should get a pass including Cotter and Burkeen. They all knew...
Its interesting that everyone is caught up on Walker and the Sponsor. None of them should get a pass including Cotter and Burkeen. They all knew what they were doing and their interviews confirm that.

Mr. Burkeen clearly stated that there was no coercion in his interview, 1:55:00. Per ML's original post, "Burkeen states that the AMA rules relating to a claim will only penalize another party if they counter claim a bike to interfere or if a rider is directly threatened by the claimed party. Negotiating a deal to receive some level of support in return for dropping a claim is NOT against the rules."

That is the definition of coercing someone!

Definition of coerce
transitive verb

1: to compel to an act or choice
was coerced into agreeing
abusers who coerce their victims into silence
2: to achieve by force or threat
coerce compliance
coerce obedience
3: to restrain or dominate by force
religion in the past has tried to coerce the irreligious
— W. R. Inge


Per the 2022 AMA Rulebook......

Section 1.1 A - 12

12. Each rider is responsible for the actions of their family and pit
crew, and any detrimental action caused by these
individuals puts that rider at risk of disqualification.


Section 1.3 J - 7

7. Any rider deemed by the AMA to be complicit in
circumventing the claiming rule (i.e. placing a claim with
the intent of returning the motorcycle to the original owner),
will be subject to a 1-year suspension of competition
privileges.

@ 1:59:40 of the interview - Mr. Burkeen admits that he once offered to try and circumvent a claim on AC's cobra back in that day.

Now the really simple part.

1. Brennan made the claim (everyone agrees that he did every per the rules)
2. The AMA notifies the Deegan's.
3. Brian Deegan notifies Donnie at Yamaha and informs him that Matt Walker trains him.
4. Donnie meets up with Matt and Brennan shows up at the camp site.
5. Donnie offers two engines and an opportunity to ride a Star bike at the Goat Farm. (This was admitted and confirmed by Donnie)

Per the rules listed above, Brian Deegan and Yamaha is "complicit in circumventing the claiming rule" and Haiden is responsible. He should be DQ'd from the event and suspended from AMA events per the the rule. I understand that this will never happen because the AMA (Burkeen) takes part in such activities per his interview and statements.

It's important to note that Cotter specifically asked Brennan if he was pressured into retracting his claim, indicating that wasn't allowed.

Well which is it? Is bribing people to retract their claim to circumvent the rule allowed or not? If it is then they should state that in the rule book.

haiden deegan getting DQed will never happen.

but

if your auguement was put in front of a judge in civil court it would previal. no question. The judge rules under the standard of a "preponderance" of the evidence. so you just got to tip the scale 51% to 49%

Its an ez case, I think, to say Brian Deegan was "complicit in
circumventing the claiming rule" No question.

And because of:

Section 1.1 A - 12

12. Each rider is responsible for the actions of their family and pit
crew, and any detrimental action caused by these
individuals puts that rider at risk of disqualification.

Done!!


never happen though
8
4
8/17/2022 11:07am
If as Weege reports the father said that they would not claim the bike, this is over.
It's over no matter what. Moto industry already said no.
3
8tensolutions
Posts
3309
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT US
8/17/2022 11:20am
Camp332 wrote:
The next chapter begins.

New GoFundme by Brennan

EDIT: Campaign is no longer there. Link removed

GrapeApe wrote:
You have got to be fucking kidding me, what happened to his $17,500 cash? Wait, could it be . . . nah. That was his money...
You have got to be fucking kidding me, what happened to his $17,500 cash? Wait, could it be . . . nah. That was his money that he earned changing tires.

I hope everyone that contributes to this sob story understand this kid has been living full time at a training facility for 3 years. Yes, a full year before he raced the C class at LL's he was living full time at a training facility. Not long ago this forum would have said this is the kind of thing that is wrong with amateur motocross. Now those same people will contribute to this half-assed panhandling.

Down vote away, this story sucks and its getting worse.
Yep. Agree 100%. He "lost" his bikes that were never his. The dealer loaned them to him and he can afford to live full time thousands of miles from home to train and ride daily. He said himself he would return the bikes all clapped out and they would hand him new ones. Where is the ROI on that especially for a C rider (until this year) and the dealer appears to feel slapped in the face on this claiming thing and not having it discussed with him prior to happening....with his logos all over Brennans bike...and his son trains at Moto X too! The go fund me is comical at best.

Should he have gotten the bike? Yes, but his Dad said no go and lost their support anyway. Bad luck etc, but move on and if you are fast enough finding support won't be a problem.

Alternatively, take your $17,500 and go to Budds Creek this weekend and claim Deegan's bike again. It will actually be cheaper since Loretta's is the only one that is 200% (my understanding)

2
4
8/17/2022 11:28am
Gungadin wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. The 'arm' is the stroke length. Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at...
Thanks for the heads up.

The 'arm' is the stroke length.

Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at each end.
No it doesn’t. You need to put the pin further out on the crank to increase the stroke , a longer rod does not come back down further if the crank pin is in the same position
1
1
USA
Posts
2536
Joined
9/4/2016
Location
Richmond, TX US
Fantasy
8/17/2022 11:33am
MX455 wrote:
Its interesting that everyone is caught up on Walker and the Sponsor. None of them should get a pass including Cotter and Burkeen. They all knew...
Its interesting that everyone is caught up on Walker and the Sponsor. None of them should get a pass including Cotter and Burkeen. They all knew what they were doing and their interviews confirm that.

Mr. Burkeen clearly stated that there was no coercion in his interview, 1:55:00. Per ML's original post, "Burkeen states that the AMA rules relating to a claim will only penalize another party if they counter claim a bike to interfere or if a rider is directly threatened by the claimed party. Negotiating a deal to receive some level of support in return for dropping a claim is NOT against the rules."

That is the definition of coercing someone!

Definition of coerce
transitive verb

1: to compel to an act or choice
was coerced into agreeing
abusers who coerce their victims into silence
2: to achieve by force or threat
coerce compliance
coerce obedience
3: to restrain or dominate by force
religion in the past has tried to coerce the irreligious
— W. R. Inge


Per the 2022 AMA Rulebook......

Section 1.1 A - 12

12. Each rider is responsible for the actions of their family and pit
crew, and any detrimental action caused by these
individuals puts that rider at risk of disqualification.


Section 1.3 J - 7

7. Any rider deemed by the AMA to be complicit in
circumventing the claiming rule (i.e. placing a claim with
the intent of returning the motorcycle to the original owner),
will be subject to a 1-year suspension of competition
privileges.

@ 1:59:40 of the interview - Mr. Burkeen admits that he once offered to try and circumvent a claim on AC's cobra back in that day.

Now the really simple part.

1. Brennan made the claim (everyone agrees that he did every per the rules)
2. The AMA notifies the Deegan's.
3. Brian Deegan notifies Donnie at Yamaha and informs him that Matt Walker trains him.
4. Donnie meets up with Matt and Brennan shows up at the camp site.
5. Donnie offers two engines and an opportunity to ride a Star bike at the Goat Farm. (This was admitted and confirmed by Donnie)

Per the rules listed above, Brian Deegan and Yamaha is "complicit in circumventing the claiming rule" and Haiden is responsible. He should be DQ'd from the event and suspended from AMA events per the the rule. I understand that this will never happen because the AMA (Burkeen) takes part in such activities per his interview and statements.

It's important to note that Cotter specifically asked Brennan if he was pressured into retracting his claim, indicating that wasn't allowed.

Well which is it? Is bribing people to retract their claim to circumvent the rule allowed or not? If it is then they should state that in the rule book.

100% agree with your synopsis here. Just to add to your timeline:

At 10:40 in Vital's interview with Donny Luce, Donny says "it became very evident to me that we weren't going to change their mind", this happened very early in the conversation once Brennan showed up.

So, Donny is informed by Deegan that a claim has been initiated, then he walks over to Walkers pit and immediately starts trying to "change their mind". Donny then offers 2 free motors to Brennan if he agrees to drop the claim.

I'm starting to believe that Deegan/Star were the one that reached out to the dealer. So, Brian initiated the bribes from Donny Luce, and it appears that Brian or Star initiated whatever transpired between the sponsor and Brennan.

The common sense here is that this is clearly an attempt to circumvent the rules and keep the bike from getting claimed. The problem is that the AMA has written the circumvention rule to only apply to placing counter claims (they use i.e. instead of e.g.).

So, I'd say the spirit of the rule was definitely broken, but the rule itself was not broken as it is written. I hope the new changes to the rule address this, I know Burkeen mentioned that in the future "all sales are final", so that should help.
4
SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13556
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX US
8/17/2022 11:52am Edited Date/Time 8/17/2022 12:03pm
Gungadin wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. The 'arm' is the stroke length. Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at...
Thanks for the heads up.

The 'arm' is the stroke length.

Increase the arm by 3 mm and the stroke increases 6 mm- 3 mm at each end.
scott_nz wrote:
No it doesn’t. You need to put the pin further out on the crank to increase the stroke , a longer rod does not come back...
No it doesn’t. You need to put the pin further out on the crank to increase the stroke , a longer rod does not come back down further if the crank pin is in the same position
Which increases the 'arm' length.

I think y'all are arguing the same thing.

I think Gungadin is calling the "Crank Radius" the "arm length".

I've never heard the term, but it makes sense.
ML512
Posts
16877
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
8/17/2022 11:57am
Does Deegan's claimed/not claimed bike have an electric water pump?
As far as I could see, no.
dkurtd
Posts
1111
Joined
4/15/2018
Location
TN US
8/17/2022 12:01pm
Melicar wrote:
I was going to float the same thing I think you're saying. My question after all of this that hasn't been brought up is the connection...
I was going to float the same thing I think you're saying.

My question after all of this that hasn't been brought up is the connection between the dealer and everyone. He's a Yamaha dealer. His son trains with Walker and presumably races a Yamaha. I don't know his age, class, or even how good he is. Since Deegan knew to tell Yamaha Don that Brennan trains with Walker, it wouldn't be a stretch to think since they are all connected that the Star camp could have reached out to the dealer. There may not have been threats of losing the Yamaha franchise but with a son racing and training with Walker a threat of "you'll never receive any help for your son in his potential career" is at least a plausible scenario. Take that as you will but seems reasonable to me for the dealer to be so upset he came back to town to "squash it".
The dealer's son rides KTM, supermini 1 at Loretta's and had a 15th,DNF,DNF for 35th. So, no he doesn't ride a Yamaha or any brand the dad sales.
MX455
Posts
223
Joined
4/24/2009
Location
Tampa, FL US
8/17/2022 12:04pm
USA wrote:
100% agree with your synopsis here. Just to add to your timeline: At 10:40 in Vital's interview with Donny Luce, Donny says "it became very evident...
100% agree with your synopsis here. Just to add to your timeline:

At 10:40 in Vital's interview with Donny Luce, Donny says "it became very evident to me that we weren't going to change their mind", this happened very early in the conversation once Brennan showed up.

So, Donny is informed by Deegan that a claim has been initiated, then he walks over to Walkers pit and immediately starts trying to "change their mind". Donny then offers 2 free motors to Brennan if he agrees to drop the claim.

I'm starting to believe that Deegan/Star were the one that reached out to the dealer. So, Brian initiated the bribes from Donny Luce, and it appears that Brian or Star initiated whatever transpired between the sponsor and Brennan.

The common sense here is that this is clearly an attempt to circumvent the rules and keep the bike from getting claimed. The problem is that the AMA has written the circumvention rule to only apply to placing counter claims (they use i.e. instead of e.g.).

So, I'd say the spirit of the rule was definitely broken, but the rule itself was not broken as it is written. I hope the new changes to the rule address this, I know Burkeen mentioned that in the future "all sales are final", so that should help.
Yup, the devil is in the details (I had to look up i.e. vs e.g.).
1
Airick
Posts
228
Joined
1/27/2017
Location
Hollywood, MD US
8/17/2022 12:05pm
mx 219 wrote:
How the heck is the kid going to "defame" the deegans?

Like what kind of question is that?
So thru this I learned it’s pronounced de-fame, not Defame. Like defamation, so it does make sense. Nothing to do with YouTube “fame”.
1
8/17/2022 12:05pm
Camp332 wrote:
The next chapter begins.

New GoFundme by Brennan

EDIT: Campaign is no longer there. Link removed

Campaign not found. I looked earlier and it was definitely there and had donations. Looked very sketchy to me for some reason with the title "Dirbiker" or something like that.

I wonder if someone was trying to make a few bucks on this thing?
1
Camp332
Posts
8673
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Zoo Jersey US
8/17/2022 12:09pm
Camp332 wrote:
The next chapter begins.

New GoFundme by Brennan

EDIT: Campaign is no longer there. Link removed

Campaign not found. I looked earlier and it was definitely there and had donations. Looked very sketchy to me for some reason with the title "Dirbiker"...
Campaign not found. I looked earlier and it was definitely there and had donations. Looked very sketchy to me for some reason with the title "Dirbiker" or something like that.

I wonder if someone was trying to make a few bucks on this thing?
Thanks for the heads up. I edited my post. Maybe it was fraud.
1
8/17/2022 12:13pm
If as Weege reports the father said that they would not claim the bike, this is over.
Even if there is an element of coercion involved?

Post a reply to: The Deegan Bike Claim Story - Part 1, 2, and 3 | UPDATE: Brennan's Sponsor Responds | Schofield, Cotter, Burkeen, Deegan, Luce, and Walker

The Latest