Posts
31
Joined
2/22/2022
Location
Middletown, PA
US
What are some things that could be changed/added to the rule to keep situations like this from happening again? I think if there was confidentiality part to it that would help where only the ama officials/ mx sports knows who filed the claim that would keep the rider from getting pressured, bullied, or harassed. (Not saying that happened in this specific situation)
Anotha one!
Hold teams accountable.
2x msrp if in same class
3x msrp if not in same class
Anyone can claim any bike at Loretta’s. That should be the rule.
Stop with these factory children on $50,000 factory bikes.
We need more claims. Not less.
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
In addition, I think in a case like Deegan's in which a rider has another moto to race the next day, rules should be in place to protect the bike for its new owner. If someone knew their bike was being claimed after a race, it would be pretty tempting to blow it up out of spite. You can't really control the way they race it, but something like an intentional burn out, ghost-riding it into water, or just holding it wide open in neutral should be prohibited. Intentionally harming the bike should carry the same penalty as circumventing the claim process: a year ban. At first I was thinking that the rider (and entourage) shouldn't be informed of the claim at all until the AMA comes to collect the bike, but that creates potential issues with motors or parts being swapped before the final moto if they are worried about a bike being claimed; the bike needs to be in impound once the claim is made.
My crystal ball shows claims becoming a much more frequent occurrence and I'm all for it.
This sport rocks!
What’s the downside of requiring a sealed motor for the entire event? It’ll encourage building for durability.
Deegan doesn’t pay a dime for anything. And I would guess most in the top 10 are getting a lot of free stuff. Or heavily discounted.
Turns out even a 16th place rider at LLs gets 6 free Yamahas a year from a local dealer now.
So to say well now a pipe and silencer costs $1,500 so now there is just sooo much more money into the the bikes that you should increase the claim value to 4x msrp.
Bullshit.
No rider or family who actually gets their bike claimed is out a single penny.
That’s why it’s important to keep the claim level low to hold teams accountable.
And change the rule so anyone can claim a bike.
2x msrp if in same class
3x msrp if out of class
If Harris wants to claim a star bike he should be able to at 3x msrp.
If Star doesn’t want to lose “money” or tech then don’t put a kid on a $50,000 motorcycle at an place that’s supposed to showcase amateur racing. Not the latest and greatest in factory bike technology.
Allowing "completely different suspension" IS a huge part of the problem...in Amateur racing. Bye the way, I believe the rule book allows $7500 for that...which is ALSO RIDICULOUS when you think about it.
Stock Major Component limitations with ONLY certain internal parts being allowed to be changed would be a damn good start.
Look, I know you and I know you still have a passion for our sport: it needs to be reigned in and it needs to have serious limitations for...
Amateur Racing Equipment.
Here's an example that surely would need greater "attention to details" in the language...
Suspension: Must use stock structural components and only internal valving, seals, fasteners, bladders and spring changes allowed. Spring Kits for Air Suspension is allowed limited to $XXX.XX. Etc., etc., etc. ....
Something along those lines.
So you are saying ALL brands of Factory Editions should also be illegal?
The fact that Brennan, a minor, found himself alone in a room with a MX Sports representative, a trainer and Deegan is just completely astounding to me. What a bunch of moronic clowns. DC is a moron too for allowing this to happen.
While I am surprised that they raced the same bike in 2 classes there should also be a rule on what they do if this happens again.
Pit Row
Currently it’s 2x msrp. (I think)
Are there a ton of claims each year?
No. Claiming is rare.
And the reason is because the expectation is that everyone is running a bike with parts they can buy themselves.
So what’s to claim? Nothing you can’t buy. Right?
But then sometimes you have a team like Star that puts a kid on a $50,000 motorcycle. With parts that cannot be purchased.
That’s exactly what the claim rule is for.
Claiming should be encouraged. Not discouraged.
The only thing that stands out to me that would help is to have the post claim process clarify who is entitled to be involved.
"If more than one claim is received for the same motorcycle,
the meet referee will hold a drawing to determine the
successful claimant."
https://americanmotorcyclist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/AMA_2022-RU…
Like the 3x for other classes👍
Random AMA tear down. Public Tear Down.
Anyone entering those races shouldn't be running $10k suspension. That is the point of the rule. They should be running only modified stock stuff to their weight etc.
I know of one of the BIG motor builders that in the past offered several different levels of motor work for their sponsored riders up to a $10,000+ just for motor mods. Rider/parents decide how much $ they want to spend for what they get. Want a bike that totally RIPS? $$$$$$$$$$$ !!!
Post a reply to: Claiming rule changes?