Posts
242
Joined
5/1/2017
Location
Vancouver
CA
Edited Date/Time
8/18/2022 7:04pm
I think in general manufactures want to keep weight as low as possible?
I'm an off road guy on a KTM and never understood why MX guys don't run the same tanks and don't fill them up. wouldn't that keep weight lower? What am I missing?


I'm an off road guy on a KTM and never understood why MX guys don't run the same tanks and don't fill them up. wouldn't that keep weight lower? What am I missing?


The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
I can remember when we could but radiator relocation kits that would lower our radiators some insignificant amount too, think it was 10mm. And even full, a radiator is very light so I doubt this made any difference at all.
To minimize the change in feel due to the change in fuel level, the ideal tank placement doesn't necessarily lower the fuel on the bike, but rather puts it right at the center of gravity of the bike. That's not possible as there are parts in the way, but I imagine the OEMs put the fuel as close to it as they can.
Whether or not an off-road tank is better for fuel distribution than a standard tank depends on how close each tank keeps the fuel to the center of gravity of the bike. I suspect the standard tank does a better job of that, but I haven't had much of a reason to verify that suspicion either.
Pit Row
Maybe tank foam would help? I’ve been wanting to try that stuff for years, it’s common in car racing for handling and safety reasons.
It did help with handling as far as better controlling the sloshing fuel (I'd rate it a 6/10), but it also did the following:
(1) Reduced range, which makes total sense given you've added something in the tank/reduced fuel volume. It just happens that this 80-mile loop a buddy and I would hit hard was the max range of the IMS tank. First time out with the tank foam and I came up about 1 mile short. Live and learn ...
(2) Fuel system contamination: the foam gives off little bits of debris initially, and in my case ended up clogging the in-tank fuel filter. It definitely affected performance, but once I cleaned things up, all was good. So basically, s good "rinsing" of the foam was required and accomplished on my 79 mile ride with vigorous sloshing of fuel. If I were to do it again, I'd wash/dry the foam several times in the kitchen sink before installing in the fuel tank.
Ultimately I ended up just getting rid of the foam. It wasn't that much of a game changer for the primary type of riding at the time (desert, not MX) relative to the hassle. That said, I was so used to no foam (and the impaired handling) that I was OK going back to my original setup AND running out of gas leaves an impression on you. In my case, in the middle of the desert, I wanted all the fuel I could get.
I assumed it was the extra weight on the front end that improved cornering.
The extra weight was also good for calming the chassis down in general for off-roading.
Was the bike as fun on an MX track in this configuration? Nope. But it wasn't bad.
I really wish someone would make a slightly larger tank, no 3+ gallons. 2.5 would be perfect for me
Post a reply to: Why not run an off road tank?