NEW RMZ450!? oh boy.

1/5/2022 11:42am
Let’s hope Japan doesn’t fudge this release up. If they do this will most likely be the final nail in the coffin for Suzuki mx….unless their plan is to continue marketing/producing it as THE pricepoint 450.
3
1
Zycki11
Posts
7822
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL, USA
1/5/2022 11:47am
Let’s hope Japan doesn’t fudge this release up. If they do this will most likely be the final nail in the coffin for Suzuki mx….unless their...
Let’s hope Japan doesn’t fudge this release up. If they do this will most likely be the final nail in the coffin for Suzuki mx….unless their plan is to continue marketing/producing it as THE pricepoint 450.
Why would it be the final nail in the coffin? Suzuki is doing ok on money. It was a reallocation that you don’t see all of this R&D pumping through. They offer a great bike still.
2
2
Talisker
Posts
886
Joined
10/25/2018
Location
Houston, TX, USA
1/5/2022 11:52am
Suzuki does not have a money problem, they have a perception problem.
They need to change people’s perception of them and their products.
11
Moto Nomad
Posts
1158
Joined
1/19/2021
Location
Grass Valley, CA, USA
1/5/2022 11:57am
So 10 OEMs and the majority of them European, right? On big four-stroke singles. It's like the 60s all over again! (And Euro riders are even back to spanking the Americans in outdoor racing).
12
2

The Shop

1/5/2022 11:58am Edited Date/Time 1/5/2022 12:02pm
Let’s hope Japan doesn’t fudge this release up. If they do this will most likely be the final nail in the coffin for Suzuki mx….unless their...
Let’s hope Japan doesn’t fudge this release up. If they do this will most likely be the final nail in the coffin for Suzuki mx….unless their plan is to continue marketing/producing it as THE pricepoint 450.
Zycki11 wrote:
Why would it be the final nail in the coffin? Suzuki is doing ok on money. It was a reallocation that you don’t see all of...
Why would it be the final nail in the coffin? Suzuki is doing ok on money. It was a reallocation that you don’t see all of this R&D pumping through. They offer a great bike still.
Final nail in the mx world. They will continue selling everything else that does well for them no doubt.

The bike was good when they introduced it in 2008. It is largely still the same machine today in 2022. Call me crazy but I am not buying a new RMZ today for the money they want when there are many other options that are far better for only a little more. If buying a new unit with old school engineering and out dated performance are your thing. Go for it.

Obviously many of us mortals will never utilize 100% of the performance…but still I could not pull the trigger on an RMZ for these reasons.
4
10
jonesaustin
Posts
2653
Joined
7/6/2009
Location
Austin, TX, USA
1/5/2022 11:58am Edited Date/Time 1/5/2022 2:06pm
Excellent news!
1/5/2022 11:59am
dnf736 wrote:
Think about this, and I'm probably wrong somewhere but, 2023 could bring to the SX/MX table: Beta (already purchased ML's SX trailer) Triumph (already contacted PC...
Think about this, and I'm probably wrong somewhere but, 2023 could bring to the SX/MX table:
Beta (already purchased ML's SX trailer)
Triumph (already contacted PC, per some pulp show)
A new Suzuki (per this thread)
Plus
Honda
Kawasaki
Yamaha
KTM
GASGAS
Husqvarna
Stark VARG??? (I doubt it though)
That's up to 10 OEMs racing next season, double stacked rider and manufacturer 450 class.
Would love ML512 or Swap to chime in on this.

ML512 wrote:
I said on Pulp MX show that I see 9 OEMs lining up at A1 in 2023. We''ll see if I'm right... Beta with a 450...
I said on Pulp MX show that I see 9 OEMs lining up at A1 in 2023. We''ll see if I'm right...

Beta with a 450 SX team in 2023 (they bought my semi for it)

Triumph with an in-house factory team in 450 class...maybe 250 class as well.

Not sure if we see Stark in SX come 2023...if we did that would be 10 OEMs.

Suzuki will have a new 450 for the Twisted Tea HEP boys.
Its nice hearing stuff directly from the horses mouth. Thank you!!
2
Dirt.Squirt
Posts
1433
Joined
1/5/2022
Location
The Low-Dez, OR, USA
1/5/2022 11:59am
Can’t wait to see it.
2
Press516
Posts
5748
Joined
9/11/2018
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
Fantasy
1/5/2022 11:59am
dnf736 wrote:
Think about this, and I'm probably wrong somewhere but, 2023 could bring to the SX/MX table: Beta (already purchased ML's SX trailer) Triumph (already contacted PC...
Think about this, and I'm probably wrong somewhere but, 2023 could bring to the SX/MX table:
Beta (already purchased ML's SX trailer)
Triumph (already contacted PC, per some pulp show)
A new Suzuki (per this thread)
Plus
Honda
Kawasaki
Yamaha
KTM
GASGAS
Husqvarna
Stark VARG??? (I doubt it though)
That's up to 10 OEMs racing next season, double stacked rider and manufacturer 450 class.
Would love ML512 or Swap to chime in on this.

ML512 wrote:
I said on Pulp MX show that I see 9 OEMs lining up at A1 in 2023. We''ll see if I'm right... Beta with a 450...
I said on Pulp MX show that I see 9 OEMs lining up at A1 in 2023. We''ll see if I'm right...

Beta with a 450 SX team in 2023 (they bought my semi for it)

Triumph with an in-house factory team in 450 class...maybe 250 class as well.

Not sure if we see Stark in SX come 2023...if we did that would be 10 OEMs.

Suzuki will have a new 450 for the Twisted Tea HEP boys.
I don't think Stark would be ready for a couple more years, and is there a rules package in the works that would even let them race?

Everything else? Totally on the money and I can see it all happening... I am hoping it does.
1
1/5/2022 12:03pm
Talisker wrote:
Suzuki does not have a money problem, they have a perception problem.
They need to change people’s perception of them and their products.
Lol. Its not perception. They need to update their products.
6
Sandusky26
Posts
3426
Joined
7/28/2021
Location
Eastern, NC, USA
1/5/2022 12:19pm
You hippy sons of bitches need to understand the Suzuki was all new in 2018.
10
8
1/5/2022 12:19pm
Talisker wrote:
Suzuki does not have a money problem, they have a perception problem.
They need to change people’s perception of them and their products.
Lol. Its not perception. They need to update their products.
It is perception because most of the idiots saying their bike is so bad haven’t ridden one and listen to MXA trash the bike.

There hasn’t been one person that’s ridden my Suzuki that hasn’t liked it and then scratched their head asking why they have such a bad reputation.
19
1
1/5/2022 12:21pm
Clearly you never owned/rode the ‘08-‘17 RMZ. if you did you would know it was not an all new bike.
8
1/5/2022 12:23pm
Talisker wrote:
Suzuki does not have a money problem, they have a perception problem.
They need to change people’s perception of them and their products.
Lol. Its not perception. They need to update their products.
mattyhamz2 wrote:
It is perception because most of the idiots saying their bike is so bad haven’t ridden one and listen to MXA trash the bike. There hasn’t...
It is perception because most of the idiots saying their bike is so bad haven’t ridden one and listen to MXA trash the bike.

There hasn’t been one person that’s ridden my Suzuki that hasn’t liked it and then scratched their head asking why they have such a bad reputation.
It’s a good bike if you are comparing it to other 2008 models. If you are comparing it to other current models it’s not even in the same league. But again, yeah most mortals don’t know any better.
13
Ted722
Posts
4575
Joined
9/21/2011
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
1/5/2022 12:35pm
I'm not plugged into the MXGP world, but any chance we'd see this bike racing GP's before it hits the production line? Japan Nationals? Either way, it's great to hear Suzuki's working on a new scoot.
2
1
1/5/2022 12:37pm
Lol. Its not perception. They need to update their products.
mattyhamz2 wrote:
It is perception because most of the idiots saying their bike is so bad haven’t ridden one and listen to MXA trash the bike. There hasn’t...
It is perception because most of the idiots saying their bike is so bad haven’t ridden one and listen to MXA trash the bike.

There hasn’t been one person that’s ridden my Suzuki that hasn’t liked it and then scratched their head asking why they have such a bad reputation.
It’s a good bike if you are comparing it to other 2008 models. If you are comparing it to other current models it’s not even in...
It’s a good bike if you are comparing it to other 2008 models. If you are comparing it to other current models it’s not even in the same league. But again, yeah most mortals don’t know any better.
It’s still a good bike compared to current bikes. Rode a 22 and 2007 CRF450 on Saturday along with my 17 RMZ. The RMZ is lacking nothing other than a good reputation compared to new bikes.

You want to talk about a new bike that isn’t even good compared to an 08 model? That 22 CRF doesn’t hold a candle to the 2007 CRF. The 22 is a huge step backwards, but you won’t hear many tell you that.
6
9
Broseph
Posts
1203
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
1/5/2022 12:43pm
mattyhamz2 wrote:
It’s still a good bike compared to current bikes. Rode a 22 and 2007 CRF450 on Saturday along with my 17 RMZ. The RMZ is lacking...
It’s still a good bike compared to current bikes. Rode a 22 and 2007 CRF450 on Saturday along with my 17 RMZ. The RMZ is lacking nothing other than a good reputation compared to new bikes.

You want to talk about a new bike that isn’t even good compared to an 08 model? That 22 CRF doesn’t hold a candle to the 2007 CRF. The 22 is a huge step backwards, but you won’t hear many tell you that.
Could you elaborate on the ‘07 vs ‘22 CRF comparison?
1
Sandusky26
Posts
3426
Joined
7/28/2021
Location
Eastern, NC, USA
1/5/2022 12:44pm
Clearly you never owned/rode the ‘08-‘17 RMZ. if you did you would know it was not an all new bike.
Your pretty fuckin dumb
4
18
1/5/2022 12:46pm
It is 3-5 HP down and 10-15 lbs more than any other 450 mxer. It would take some serious coin just to get those numbers in the ballpark with the other mfg’s…or just be more competitive day one and buy another bike.

Again, most riders would not know any better.
3
8
ML512
Posts
16972
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA, USA
Fantasy
1/5/2022 12:48pm
Clearly you never owned/rode the ‘08-‘17 RMZ. if you did you would know it was not an all new bike.
Sandusky26 wrote:
Your pretty fuckin dumb
You're*

And the chassis was all new, different suspension components but the engine and electronics were largely left untouched. They're the only OEM that has continued with their original engine architecture from when they introduced their 450 back in the early to mid 2000s.
22
1/5/2022 12:49pm
Clearly you never owned/rode the ‘08-‘17 RMZ. if you did you would know it was not an all new bike.
Sandusky26 wrote:
Your pretty fuckin dumb
ML512 wrote:
You're* And the chassis was all new, different suspension components but the engine and electronics were largely left untouched. They're the only OEM that has continued...
You're*

And the chassis was all new, different suspension components but the engine and electronics were largely left untouched. They're the only OEM that has continued with their original engine architecture from when they introduced their 450 back in the early to mid 2000s.
Thank you.
1
5
murph783
Posts
1355
Joined
3/2/2011
Location
USA
1/5/2022 12:56pm
DunnySeat wrote:
Some people just want to watch the world burn.
Sandusky26 wrote:
Some people just want to burn a fat one and kick the shit out of their Suzuki
gt80rider wrote:
some people don't want the added expense and upkeep of electric start.... kinda like hydro clutches... works worse, yet everybody wants one....
I’m with you on the hydro clutch thing, cable till I die.

The E start though now that I’ve had one…I’m never going back, fuck that. Kicking is hard Grinning
3
2
GrapeApe
Posts
8877
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX, USA
1/5/2022 1:09pm Edited Date/Time 1/5/2022 1:16pm
Clearly you never owned/rode the ‘08-‘17 RMZ. if you did you would know it was not an all new bike.
Sandusky26 wrote:
Your pretty fuckin dumb
ML512 wrote:
You're* And the chassis was all new, different suspension components but the engine and electronics were largely left untouched. They're the only OEM that has continued...
You're*

And the chassis was all new, different suspension components but the engine and electronics were largely left untouched. They're the only OEM that has continued with their original engine architecture from when they introduced their 450 back in the early to mid 2000s.
Do you know if they are developing a new engine, or just putting the e-start from the RMX on the current RMZ? From the stories floating around the last couple of years it doesn't seem like they have any engineers or r&d personnel on the off-road side in the US or Japan to develop a new bike.
MelonFan123
Posts
1553
Joined
8/20/2006
Location
Ventura/LA County, CA, USA
1/5/2022 1:18pm
It is 3-5 HP down and 10-15 lbs more than any other 450 mxer. It would take some serious coin just to get those numbers in...
It is 3-5 HP down and 10-15 lbs more than any other 450 mxer. It would take some serious coin just to get those numbers in the ballpark with the other mfg’s…or just be more competitive day one and buy another bike.

Again, most riders would not know any better.
The Zook 450 is within 3-4 lbs of the Honda, Kawasaki and Yamaha.

Like someone said, Suzuki as a manufacturer suffers from a marketing and consumer perception problem. Not a performance or product problem.

You just proved that point.
13
2
yz133rider
Posts
5029
Joined
8/1/2013
Location
Avondale, PA, USA
1/5/2022 1:29pm
It is 3-5 HP down and 10-15 lbs more than any other 450 mxer. It would take some serious coin just to get those numbers in...
It is 3-5 HP down and 10-15 lbs more than any other 450 mxer. It would take some serious coin just to get those numbers in the ballpark with the other mfg’s…or just be more competitive day one and buy another bike.

Again, most riders would not know any better.
The Zook 450 is within 3-4 lbs of the Honda, Kawasaki and Yamaha. Like someone said, Suzuki as a manufacturer suffers from a marketing and consumer...
The Zook 450 is within 3-4 lbs of the Honda, Kawasaki and Yamaha.

Like someone said, Suzuki as a manufacturer suffers from a marketing and consumer perception problem. Not a performance or product problem.

You just proved that point.
Yeah but there’s a big difference in the weight of the Suzuki and the weight of the Honda...

The Suzuki weighs that much without hydraulic clutch and without electric start AND it makes the least amount of power.
1/5/2022 1:29pm
It is 3-5 HP down and 10-15 lbs more than any other 450 mxer. It would take some serious coin just to get those numbers in...
It is 3-5 HP down and 10-15 lbs more than any other 450 mxer. It would take some serious coin just to get those numbers in the ballpark with the other mfg’s…or just be more competitive day one and buy another bike.

Again, most riders would not know any better.
The Zook 450 is within 3-4 lbs of the Honda, Kawasaki and Yamaha. Like someone said, Suzuki as a manufacturer suffers from a marketing and consumer...
The Zook 450 is within 3-4 lbs of the Honda, Kawasaki and Yamaha.

Like someone said, Suzuki as a manufacturer suffers from a marketing and consumer perception problem. Not a performance or product problem.

You just proved that point.
Ok. I guess y’all don’t understand the difference between wet and dry weights?

Per google:
WET
RMZ450 250lb
CRF450 244lb
KX450 243lb
YZ450F 245lb
KTM450 236lb

AND THE RMZ does not have electric start.

If we were comparing apples to apples and removing the electric start from every other mfg…the Suzook would be an obese MC.

1
9
Hi Side
Posts
708
Joined
9/19/2013
Location
USA
1/5/2022 1:43pm
I would love to see Suzuki come out with kick ass mx bikes again. I wouldn't even consider another brand from 2001-2007. I'm a Husky guy to the core but it wouldn't take much for me to cheat on Husky with a sexy new yellow bike.
5
1
1/5/2022 1:45pm
dnf736 wrote:
Think about this, and I'm probably wrong somewhere but, 2023 could bring to the SX/MX table: Beta (already purchased ML's SX trailer) Triumph (already contacted PC...
Think about this, and I'm probably wrong somewhere but, 2023 could bring to the SX/MX table:
Beta (already purchased ML's SX trailer)
Triumph (already contacted PC, per some pulp show)
A new Suzuki (per this thread)
Plus
Honda
Kawasaki
Yamaha
KTM
GASGAS
Husqvarna
Stark VARG??? (I doubt it though)
That's up to 10 OEMs racing next season, double stacked rider and manufacturer 450 class.
Would love ML512 or Swap to chime in on this.

ML512 wrote:
I said on Pulp MX show that I see 9 OEMs lining up at A1 in 2023. We''ll see if I'm right... Beta with a 450...
I said on Pulp MX show that I see 9 OEMs lining up at A1 in 2023. We''ll see if I'm right...

Beta with a 450 SX team in 2023 (they bought my semi for it)

Triumph with an in-house factory team in 450 class...maybe 250 class as well.

Not sure if we see Stark in SX come 2023...if we did that would be 10 OEMs.

Suzuki will have a new 450 for the Twisted Tea HEP boys.
If you think that's even a possibility for Triumph, you must know more than you are letting on about a timeline.
1
Zycki11
Posts
7822
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL, USA
1/5/2022 1:46pm
In the end, I’m glad suzuki is coming out with something to get people excited. They have a massive presence in this sport and we all should want them to be in the mix.
32
1/5/2022 1:49pm
mattyhamz2 wrote:
It’s still a good bike compared to current bikes. Rode a 22 and 2007 CRF450 on Saturday along with my 17 RMZ. The RMZ is lacking...
It’s still a good bike compared to current bikes. Rode a 22 and 2007 CRF450 on Saturday along with my 17 RMZ. The RMZ is lacking nothing other than a good reputation compared to new bikes.

You want to talk about a new bike that isn’t even good compared to an 08 model? That 22 CRF doesn’t hold a candle to the 2007 CRF. The 22 is a huge step backwards, but you won’t hear many tell you that.
Broseph wrote:
Could you elaborate on the ‘07 vs ‘22 CRF comparison?
Absolutely. I said this in another thread earlier, but both bikes suspension was done by the same suspension tuner and both were very close in settings.
-The 22 stock mapping is one big downfall. Really dirty down low and once you finally get out of that window it hits unexpectedly hard.
-This is no exaggeration, the seat literally feels like you’re sitting on a 2x4 and you can feel everything through it.
-The chassis feels so rigid you can feel every bump and vibration through the bars, seat and foot pegs. The bike never felt planted. It wanted to dance around every time I hit a bump. It wore me out in just a few laps.
-Fast choppy straightaways are one part of the track I wanted to avoid if I could. The only way to avoid headshake was to do everything I could to make sure I hit zero bumps.
-The turning was really hard to figure out, I would oversteer, make adjustments to my positioning and then would understeer. I couldn’t find a sweet spot to combat this issue. Something I’ve never had a problem with on any other bike I’ve ridden before.

2007
- The 07 put the power to the ground so nicely. It was strong, but smooth. Easy to control unlike the weird mapping on the 22.
- The bike never did anything funky no matter what I hit, how hard I hit it or what angle I hit it at. It never kicked, danced around and I never got headshake. I rode all of the same lines that I rode on the 22.
- The 07 turned amazing and went exactly where I wanted it to go every time. It was precise. It settled into corners, and tracked straight over all of the acceleration bumps.
- The 07 was nowhere near the 22 in rigidity. I have to say it was one of the most comfortable feeling bikes I have ever ridden. I could trust it over just about everything. I could easily ride the 07 twice as many laps as the 22 and not be nearly as worn out.

Overall, the 22 was honestly the most uncomfortable bike I have ridden to date. I couldn’t trust it over anything really. I do think most of the issues I had with the 22 can be fixed with time and money, it’s just not money and time I’d be willing to spend.
I’d hands down pick the 07 every day of the week over the 22.
10
8

Post a reply to: NEW RMZ450!? oh boy.

The Latest