The Greatest Rear Suspension was Stolen!

G-man
Posts
9087
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
Edited Date/Time 6/18/2026 10:45am

Moto History for the youngsters... Smile  
I knew of this many moons ago as Don lived in Pasadena next to where I grew up--Eagle Rock. 

Through the years owned FOUR Full Floaters --Two 125's, 250 and 465 and those bikes were pure Magic! Woohoo  

When Suzuki ruled the Motocross World, through a design they stole....

https://apnews.com/article/dacd15281393eb661aafeeb012de808e



 

17
2
|
ShawdowGlen
Posts
803
Joined
1/1/2021
Location
La Mesa, CA, USA
3/24/2021 9:40am
Read about that in MXA a couple months back.

Interesting history.

1
1
Piston Slap
Posts
1985
Joined
7/2/2013
Location
Stillwater, OK, USA
3/24/2021 9:53am Edited Date/Time 3/25/2021 4:20pm
3
3/24/2021 10:56am
Yes, so did I, and a couple of years ago, and a couple of years before that, and a couple of years before that, and.......... ground hog day!
11
10
G-man
Posts
9087
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
3/24/2021 11:11am Edited Date/Time 3/24/2021 10:29pm
Well in my defense it's obvious a LOT of the younger generation of riders did not realize Suzuki DOMINATED the Motocross World at one time.
Just saying.......so if it seems like I am boring you, you can go back and engage the Rutledge Wood thread. Laughing
27
3

The Shop

mxrose3
Posts
2349
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Delmar, DE, USA
3/24/2021 11:49am
What I want to know is did Kawasaki partially steal the idea as well? The uni-trak was being developed in 1979 also, and was similar except for the bottom mount point was on the frame instead of the swingarm.
3
2
G-man
Posts
9087
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
3/24/2021 11:59am Edited Date/Time 3/24/2021 12:13pm
mxrose3 wrote:
What I want to know is did Kawasaki partially steal the idea as well? The uni-trak was being developed in 1979 also, and was similar except...
What I want to know is did Kawasaki partially steal the idea as well? The uni-trak was being developed in 1979 also, and was similar except for the bottom mount point was on the frame instead of the swingarm.
No they did not.

The key to Suzuki’s early eighties motocross success was the design of their innovative rear suspension system. Coined “Full Floater” for its unique dual-linkage design that allowed the shock to “float” independently at both the top and bottom, this system dominated motocross suspension from 1981 until its retirement in 1986.

That is why it worked so good, it was Plush as a pillow on acceleration bumps but could also handle the BIG HITS.
4
1
LoudLove
Posts
2866
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
3/24/2021 12:00pm
Recall as if were yesterday standing trackside at a National outside of Atlanta declaring “that bike ain’t got no rear suspension!” as The Jammer flew by on his Uni-Trak marvel..
2
mxrose3
Posts
2349
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Delmar, DE, USA
3/24/2021 12:14pm
mxrose3 wrote:
What I want to know is did Kawasaki partially steal the idea as well? The uni-trak was being developed in 1979 also, and was similar except...
What I want to know is did Kawasaki partially steal the idea as well? The uni-trak was being developed in 1979 also, and was similar except for the bottom mount point was on the frame instead of the swingarm.
G-man wrote:
No they did not. The key to Suzuki’s early eighties motocross success was the design of their innovative rear suspension system. Coined “Full Floater” for its...
No they did not.

The key to Suzuki’s early eighties motocross success was the design of their innovative rear suspension system. Coined “Full Floater” for its unique dual-linkage design that allowed the shock to “float” independently at both the top and bottom, this system dominated motocross suspension from 1981 until its retirement in 1986.

That is why it worked so good, it was Plush as a pillow on acceleration bumps but could also handle the BIG HITS.
Sorry to correct you G-man - The full floater did not have any moving parts on the bottom. The bottom of the shock was mounted directly to the front of the swingarm. Where the uni-trak had the bottom of the shock mounted directly to the frame. I've seen and worked on both up close, so I know the difference. The Suzuki compressed the shock from both the top and the bottom, whereas the Kawi only compressed the shock from the bell crank at the top of the shock. So there was really only one major difference in the two designs.
6
G-man
Posts
9087
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
3/24/2021 12:28pm
mxrose3 wrote:
Sorry to correct you G-man - The full floater did not have any moving parts on the bottom. The bottom of the shock was mounted directly...
Sorry to correct you G-man - The full floater did not have any moving parts on the bottom. The bottom of the shock was mounted directly to the front of the swingarm. Where the uni-trak had the bottom of the shock mounted directly to the frame. I've seen and worked on both up close, so I know the difference. The Suzuki compressed the shock from both the top and the bottom, whereas the Kawi only compressed the shock from the bell crank at the top of the shock. So there was really only one major difference in the two designs.
Yes I wasn't sure memory is foggyUnsure
So I looked it up and corrected my reply.

Thanks Cool
1
3/24/2021 12:30pm
I would agree that the full floater was great. I rode an 83 RM250 in San Diego for years. I did put an Ohlins shock on the bike as well. I did read in one of the magazines that one of the reasons it worked so well is that Suzuki paired it with a heavier than normal flywheel. It improved the action do to the engine characteristics according to the article.
Just what I remembered.
1
1
mxrose3
Posts
2349
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Delmar, DE, USA
3/24/2021 12:50pm
mxrose3 wrote:
Sorry to correct you G-man - The full floater did not have any moving parts on the bottom. The bottom of the shock was mounted directly...
Sorry to correct you G-man - The full floater did not have any moving parts on the bottom. The bottom of the shock was mounted directly to the front of the swingarm. Where the uni-trak had the bottom of the shock mounted directly to the frame. I've seen and worked on both up close, so I know the difference. The Suzuki compressed the shock from both the top and the bottom, whereas the Kawi only compressed the shock from the bell crank at the top of the shock. So there was really only one major difference in the two designs.
G-man wrote:
Yes I wasn't sure memory is foggyUnsure
So I looked it up and corrected my reply.

Thanks Cool
All Good G-man... thanks for the trip down memory lane!
Smile
2
Holigan
Posts
1448
Joined
6/18/2008
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
3/24/2021 12:52pm
G-man wrote:
Moto History for the youngsters... :) I knew of this many moons ago as Don lived in Pasadena next to where I grew up--Eagle Rock. Through the years...

Moto History for the youngsters... Smile  
I knew of this many moons ago as Don lived in Pasadena next to where I grew up--Eagle Rock. 

Through the years owned FOUR Full Floaters --Two 125's, 250 and 465 and those bikes were pure Magic! Woohoo  

When Suzuki ruled the Motocross World, through a design they stole....

https://apnews.com/article/dacd15281393eb661aafeeb012de808e



 

Do you know if Don was ever able to collect any money from Suzuki? It stated that they were considering appealing and I never heard the rest of the story.
mxrose3
Posts
2349
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Delmar, DE, USA
3/24/2021 1:24pm
It is interesting that in 1983, Suzuki released a different version of the full floater on its RM80. This version was on an enduro bike that wasn't release in the US also. Notice how the struts on the swingarm are aimed forward instead of straight up and down. This may have been an initial attempt to still use the design without getting in trouble with the law.

2
Motoxdoc
Posts
2710
Joined
11/8/2009
Location
Steamboat Springs, CO, USA
3/24/2021 2:10pm
I had an 82 RM250-Z. One of my favorite bikes! Don't know why they went away from the full floater....production expense I suppose. It seemed that squeezing the shock from both sides was an ingenious idea.
1
1
G-man
Posts
9087
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
3/24/2021 2:14pm
G-man wrote:
Moto History for the youngsters... :) I knew of this many moons ago as Don lived in Pasadena next to where I grew up--Eagle Rock. Through the years...

Moto History for the youngsters... Smile  
I knew of this many moons ago as Don lived in Pasadena next to where I grew up--Eagle Rock. 

Through the years owned FOUR Full Floaters --Two 125's, 250 and 465 and those bikes were pure Magic! Woohoo  

When Suzuki ruled the Motocross World, through a design they stole....

https://apnews.com/article/dacd15281393eb661aafeeb012de808e



 

Holigan wrote:
Do you know if Don was ever able to collect any money from Suzuki? It stated that they were considering appealing and I never heard the...
Do you know if Don was ever able to collect any money from Suzuki? It stated that they were considering appealing and I never heard the rest of the story.
From Don

" I got enough compensation to live a life of leisure if I was smart. Keyword “if ”. I was blackballed by the motorcycle industry so I went to Dakar. I invested in a smart shock concept I had. The patent office had to create a new category number. I developed the new smart shocks for Citroen Rally Raid car. The Bilsteins they were using were basically the same as used today in MX. Bilsteins 138 kph on the N Africa test loop. My Gen 1 smart shocks 185 kph. Hence the Citroen Dakar domination and later Mitsubishi VW Mini etc. I have learned that unless one has the millions to fight to protect patent rights the temptation is too great for corporations to steal and run. I’m standing down until a NorCal ranch sells after getting a permit for a rock quarry then it’s game on with Full Floater 2.0 on a RM first. I filed for the abandoned Full Floater trademark. Hopefully Suzuki will do it right next time.. I’m still a Suzuki fan.. Suzuki’s outside law-firm screwed Suzuki to make their millions at Suzuki’s demise."

8
1
G-man
Posts
9087
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
3/24/2021 2:20pm Edited Date/Time 3/24/2021 2:43pm
I would agree that the full floater was great. I rode an 83 RM250 in San Diego for years. I did put an Ohlins shock on...
I would agree that the full floater was great. I rode an 83 RM250 in San Diego for years. I did put an Ohlins shock on the bike as well. I did read in one of the magazines that one of the reasons it worked so well is that Suzuki paired it with a heavier than normal flywheel. It improved the action do to the engine characteristics according to the article.
Just what I remembered.
I don't recall anything about the fly wheel helping the suspension.
My 125 screemed like a banshee--I wish I still had that bike. RIP...Sad

The reason I bought the 125 as I already had the 465 was Cole brothers Suzuki in Burbank was blowing them out I think it was like $800 dollars!

But damn I didn't even know they made Ohilins shocks for those bikes.
Didn't know you could make it even better, what was that like?
sandman768
Posts
8089
Joined
3/21/2014
Location
Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
3/24/2021 3:03pm
Great story and shame on Suzuki for not doing the right thing....
4
FWYT
Posts
3553
Joined
5/25/2014
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
3/24/2021 3:08pm
G-man wrote:
From Don " I got enough compensation to live a life of leisure if I was smart. Keyword “if ”. I was blackballed by the motorcycle...
From Don

" I got enough compensation to live a life of leisure if I was smart. Keyword “if ”. I was blackballed by the motorcycle industry so I went to Dakar. I invested in a smart shock concept I had. The patent office had to create a new category number. I developed the new smart shocks for Citroen Rally Raid car. The Bilsteins they were using were basically the same as used today in MX. Bilsteins 138 kph on the N Africa test loop. My Gen 1 smart shocks 185 kph. Hence the Citroen Dakar domination and later Mitsubishi VW Mini etc. I have learned that unless one has the millions to fight to protect patent rights the temptation is too great for corporations to steal and run. I’m standing down until a NorCal ranch sells after getting a permit for a rock quarry then it’s game on with Full Floater 2.0 on a RM first. I filed for the abandoned Full Floater trademark. Hopefully Suzuki will do it right next time.. I’m still a Suzuki fan.. Suzuki’s outside law-firm screwed Suzuki to make their millions at Suzuki’s demise."

Man, what a drag. I hate seeing intellectual property rights get trampled on and stolen, whether it is artists, inventors or whatever. But it is a story often heard. Shameful.
5
chrisg19
Posts
455
Joined
10/6/2014
Location
Castle Rock, CO, USA
3/24/2021 6:19pm
I love having grown up in that era of MX. I would wait on my copy of MXA each month to see who was trying what next. Such a great time to be part of the sport, when every year brought a new innovation to the production bikes.
9
pelted
Posts
675
Joined
6/25/2007
Location
., USA
3/24/2021 6:54pm
I had an 83 RM 250. Fantastic rear, mediocre forks, and terrible brakes. If you could just wheelie over obstacles there wasn't much the thing couldn't handle.
1
3/24/2021 8:58pm
I would agree that the full floater was great. I rode an 83 RM250 in San Diego for years. I did put an Ohlins shock on...
I would agree that the full floater was great. I rode an 83 RM250 in San Diego for years. I did put an Ohlins shock on the bike as well. I did read in one of the magazines that one of the reasons it worked so well is that Suzuki paired it with a heavier than normal flywheel. It improved the action do to the engine characteristics according to the article.
Just what I remembered.
G-man wrote:
I don't recall anything about the fly wheel helping the suspension. My 125 screemed like a banshee--I wish I still had that bike. RIP...:( The reason...
I don't recall anything about the fly wheel helping the suspension.
My 125 screemed like a banshee--I wish I still had that bike. RIP...Sad

The reason I bought the 125 as I already had the 465 was Cole brothers Suzuki in Burbank was blowing them out I think it was like $800 dollars!

But damn I didn't even know they made Ohilins shocks for those bikes.
Didn't know you could make it even better, what was that like?
Here again, I was in my twenties and my memories are hazy. I think I blew the OEM shock up and what the hell, let’s buy an Ohlins! I was riding mostly Ocotillo, Palm Ave and Carlsbad. I remember it being more stable and less kick (even on the full floater) This is one of only a few pics I have from back then. Sand Dam at Superstition Mtn.
4
3/24/2021 9:02pm
pelted wrote:
I had an 83 RM 250. Fantastic rear, mediocre forks, and terrible brakes. If you could just wheelie over obstacles there wasn't much the thing couldn't...
I had an 83 RM 250. Fantastic rear, mediocre forks, and terrible brakes. If you could just wheelie over obstacles there wasn't much the thing couldn't handle.
Yes! The brakes sucked! I would rough the pads with sand paper and de-glaze the drums. Double pivot whatever...
cz2crf2wc
Posts
544
Joined
11/22/2013
Location
Solona Beach, CA, USA
3/24/2021 9:07pm
Best thing is that he's young enough now to enjoy the money now.
Steve125
Posts
1410
Joined
11/24/2010
Location
USA
3/25/2021 4:14am
I race a couple 82 Floaters now and then. Every bit as good as my '21 450 rear suspension. In fact, the only thing that feels dated on the bike are the brakes (no brakes) and the rake of the forks seems really kicked out compared to the new bikes.
BTW: Don is a big Pontiac Engine builder now. He gets some big HP numbers out of those engines.
3
racerxx276
Posts
253
Joined
10/22/2015
Location
Boise, ID, USA
3/25/2021 5:42am
I loved the full floater. The problem was that the forks could never keep up with how good the rear was...
and 3rd gear blew up every race...
1
Piston Slap
Posts
1985
Joined
7/2/2013
Location
Stillwater, OK, USA
3/25/2021 4:21pm Edited Date/Time 3/25/2021 4:26pm
G-man wrote:
Moto History for the youngsters... :) I knew of this many moons ago as Don lived in Pasadena next to where I grew up--Eagle Rock. Through the years...

Moto History for the youngsters... Smile  
I knew of this many moons ago as Don lived in Pasadena next to where I grew up--Eagle Rock. 

Through the years owned FOUR Full Floaters --Two 125's, 250 and 465 and those bikes were pure Magic! Woohoo  

When Suzuki ruled the Motocross World, through a design they stole....

https://apnews.com/article/dacd15281393eb661aafeeb012de808e



 

G-man,

Here is a link to Court Documents in re: Full floater.

i thought it was interesting to read

BTW 104,000 USD judgement on infringement, 20,000 compensatory and 100,000 in Punitive damages.

$224,000, a good payday back then. . .

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/868/1226/17438/
1
Tonynz
Posts
847
Joined
9/21/2014
Location
NZ
3/25/2021 6:12pm
Bought the book on Kindle a couple of hours ago. About a 1/3 of the way through it.
I hade a 1981, PE 175 Z, and 1985 RM 125 F, both with Full Floater
1
G-man
Posts
9087
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
6/17/2026 11:25pm

A bump down memory lane, when Suzuki's Full Floater ruled the Motocross world. 😎

Motorcycle Full Floater Suspension Systems - Blue Strada Tours https://share.google/a7yBpagVjGhHRzvif

 

4

Post a reply to: The Greatest Rear Suspension was Stolen!

The Latest