New Battery Technology Sodium Ion

Johnny Depp
Posts
6435
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
Edited Date/Time 7/4/2019 6:18am



"Previous designs for sodium ion batteries did not accomplish an energy density as high as lithium ion. What the Germans did was make it possible to build the battery through dry deposition of materials, which increased reliability and reduced the price enormously, and also increased energy density enormously. If you look up sodium ion batteries you will get old material from 2018 where small research groups managed to make sodium ion batteries work, at a 20 percent cost savings per watt hour over lithium ion. What has happened in Germany is that with the new manufacturing tech, sodium ion batteries will now be practical, plus have a higher energy density than lithium ion, PLUS have a cost reduction of 80 or more percent over lithium ion.
What the Germans managed to do is invent a battery tech where the batteries are basically simply dry painted into existence the way cars are painted during manufacture now, which eliminated all the work and all the hazardous chemicals that have always been a part of the battery manufacturing process. The Germans got it down to a process as simple as painting a surface or printing a newspaper at super high speed, with results better than any battery we have now. There is a chance that in the near future, the cost of a battery for a car will be less than $1, 000 USD vs practically the entire cost of the car nowadays, and to top it all off, the car will go much much farther on a charge. Cost savings are not that drastic yet, but they are still enough to revolutionize electric cars.

I predict the technology will be allowed to proceed and won't be taken away the way so many other great technologies probably were. We will probably see this, and since the late R&D is happening via a major battery maker and not an isolated laboratory, it could hit the market very quickly.

The lithium in lithium ion batteries is a fairly rare metal. It is not a precious metal, but it is not common at all and carries a heavy cost premium. Sodium on the other hand is the most common of all metals, (unless you call hydrogen a metal) sodium is more common than even iron. It is also very easy to isolate as a metal, if you hit the right sourcing sodium is dirt cheap. Hydrogen is technically a metal but in a practical sense it is not, and can't be used in a battery the way metals that don't primarily exist as a gas can be used. Combining the abundance and cheapness of sodium with a manufacturing process that is basically as simple as printing toilet paper will have a MAJOR impact on battery prices, this will, if it comes to fruition, be a death sentence for gasoline powered cars. Electric cars will be cheaper and they will perform just as well.


New battery type: Sodium Ion
The report I have linked here does not even go into the significance of being able to use sodium - the bubble headed reporter, who probably flunked chemistry, missed it like a hail mary in a hurricane. But she at least reported there is a new battery making process. The real breakthrough however is that the process allows us to move from Lithium ion to Sodium ion batteries, and they are already making them. It does work. And it is a major battery manufacturer that is doing the proofing on this, not college kids. This will drastically increase energy density and sodium is the most common metal on earth that you can observe as metal at room temperature - it is DIRT CHEAP.
Sodium is more electropositive than Lithium, which means more energy can be stored by sodium. But it has not been possible to use sodium up until now because it is too soft and too reactive. Knowing the new advantages of the new manufacturing process, they did not even bother with lithium, they cut straight to sodium. That's a serious breakthrough. None of this is specifically pointed out in the linked report, you have to read between the lines to see it."

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Battery-Breakthrough-Solves-…

With KTM announcing the KJSC SX Junior program is going Electric next year, this should make for fun discussion..https://racerxonline.com/2019/06/05/insight-kjsc-going-electric
5
|
mx_563
Posts
2197
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
6/6/2019 7:15am
There's a lot more at stake than your personal spectating enjoyment.
24
7
kb228
Posts
6153
Joined
1/31/2018
Location
Mansfield, OH, USA
6/6/2019 7:16am
Im all for electric to be available but the thought of the switch to electric pro racing is depressing. The sound and smell of race gas is a big part of the experience.

Oh, and cool advancement on the batteries
15
2
Bike Rat
Posts
354
Joined
7/3/2012
Location
Fort Collins, CO, USA
6/6/2019 7:24am Edited Date/Time 6/6/2019 8:14am
I’m excited for the electric revolution, especially with better battery technology. Personally don’t like the smell of gasoline or exhaust..

I think that electric vehicles/ bikes need to make a better sound. Something that doesn’t sound like a RC car! It’s an easy safety upgrade! Loud pipes save lives💨💨
1
10
bayodome
Posts
1200
Joined
12/18/2006
Location
Mid-level, Hong Kong Island, HK
6/6/2019 7:26am
I don't care about the sound or the smell. It has nothing to do with the racing itself. Bring on more electrics!

Interesting technological development, Johnny. Thanks for sharing. Let's hope it gains some footing.
5
3

The Shop

early
Posts
9900
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
6/6/2019 7:33am
New class structure: MX-E (electric), MX-TRAD (traditional petroleum power). Just like RC car racing.

There's alot of snake oil in the battery/power storage game. I'm optimistic but I'll believe it when I see it. A safe battery, with super high energy density could change our daily lives in a way that hasn't been seen since the widespread use of the internet.
5
6/6/2019 7:38am
You didn't even link real Formula E. That’s a video game. Laughing
4
2
loftyair
Posts
2901
Joined
7/3/2009
Location
riverside, CA, USA
6/6/2019 8:02am
mx_563 wrote:
There's a lot more at stake than your personal spectating enjoyment.
Or is it his hearing? Spectating is not what these 'listeners' are paying for, I guess?
6/6/2019 8:51am Edited Date/Time 6/6/2019 10:41am
That’s better.
-MAVERICK-
Posts
66426
Joined
3/26/2015
Location
Ontario, CA
6/6/2019 8:59am
Haven’t seen a thread on this: https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2019/06/05/supercross-to-debut-first-ev-class-and-tap-startups-to-go-digital/amp/ That little KTM is sweet. Once sorted, I predict the performance of electric bikes will be absolutely dominant. That...
Haven’t seen a thread on this:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2019/06/05/supercross-to-de…

That little KTM is sweet.

Once sorted, I predict the performance of electric bikes will be absolutely dominant. That alone will end the debate and all the squabbling will cease.
1
6/6/2019 9:26am
I encourage anyone that hasn't yet experienced electric propulsion to go out and try it. It really is fantastic, on road and off road.
7
1
gt80rider
Posts
7048
Joined
4/19/2008
Location
Boulder, CO, USA
6/6/2019 9:28am
You'll find press releases just like this daily............ so you need to dismiss them...... sure, new designs may grab another 1-7%, but nothing massive like what we need on the order of 200% or greater.........

The problem is physics..... we've reached our limit as far as energy density can go cost effectively.... this was reached a decade and a half ago........

You will NOT see massive increases in energy density without a Massive breakthrough in energy storage tech at the atomic level....... this is very far away....... lets say at least 10 years........

Furthermore, the energy storage biz has a much larger issue..... we are running out of raw materials at a staggering rate...... Lithium, cobalt, magnesium, etc...... demand is skyrocketing, while supply dwindles and gets harder each day to secure.....
2
3
Johnny Depp
Posts
6435
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
6/6/2019 9:37am
gt80rider wrote:
You'll find press releases just like this daily............ so you need to dismiss them...... sure, new designs may grab another 1-7%, but nothing massive like what...
You'll find press releases just like this daily............ so you need to dismiss them...... sure, new designs may grab another 1-7%, but nothing massive like what we need on the order of 200% or greater.........

The problem is physics..... we've reached our limit as far as energy density can go cost effectively.... this was reached a decade and a half ago........

You will NOT see massive increases in energy density without a Massive breakthrough in energy storage tech at the atomic level....... this is very far away....... lets say at least 10 years........

Furthermore, the energy storage biz has a much larger issue..... we are running out of raw materials at a staggering rate...... Lithium, cobalt, magnesium, etc...... demand is skyrocketing, while supply dwindles and gets harder each day to secure.....
Reading is fundamental.
2
ga_pike
Posts
2650
Joined
7/14/2011
Location
Valdosta, GA, USA
6/6/2019 10:29am
FTR - I enjoy Formula E. The racing is outstanding and those cars are stupid fast.
2
2
6/6/2019 10:39am
Your original reply of “try again” came across wrong. It’s impossible to read someone’s tone and I thought you were getting sassy. lol That’s on me(rough morning). I apologize. Your 2nd version with “I posted the wrong link” is much better. I’ll edit my post.
racerxx276
Posts
253
Joined
10/22/2015
Location
Boise, ID, USA
6/6/2019 11:26am
I encourage anyone that hasn't yet experienced electric propulsion to go out and try it. It really is fantastic, on road and off road.
Yup, it would be awesome on my 80 mile, 6 hr rides...

oh wait , that would only get me 1/4 way there... The LAST bike I want to be on when riding in the wilderness is an electric bike...

The "advancement" from 2 stroke to 4 stroke was pure politics, as is the push of electric bikes...
And more $$
4
1
6/6/2019 11:50am Edited Date/Time 6/6/2019 11:52am
racerxx276 wrote:
Yup, it would be awesome on my 80 mile, 6 hr rides... oh wait , that would only get me 1/4 way there... The LAST bike...
Yup, it would be awesome on my 80 mile, 6 hr rides...

oh wait , that would only get me 1/4 way there... The LAST bike I want to be on when riding in the wilderness is an electric bike...

The "advancement" from 2 stroke to 4 stroke was pure politics, as is the push of electric bikes...
And more $$
You ride 6 hours straight without taking any breaks? If so, you are the exception to the general offroad motorcycling population, and definitely need the range of a full sized enduro or loaded out dual sport. The Alta with 5.8KW battery lasts me over 2 hours dicking around in tight single track stuff. By that point I'm ready for a break anyway. Alta was working on an extended range dual sport that would have provided roughly 25-50% more range with a larger battery. It would of course came with a weight penalty but i think offroad guys would sacrifice a little weight penalty for added range, even on their gas bikes.

I don't agree with "more $$".... maybe its more money up front, but in the long run i suspect it will be cheaper. I have over 60 hours on my MXR and have only needed to change 80ml of gear oil. I spend more time tinkering with my 2 strokes and 4 strokes than i do riding them. With the Alta its the complete opposite... I spend way more time riding it than i do tinkering with it.

What is it worth to you to have a bike that requires less maintenance, allows you to ride in more areas without pissing people off (allowing you to ride more overall), and doesn't destroy your hearing?
1
3
77Moto
Posts
512
Joined
1/31/2019
Location
CA
6/6/2019 11:53am
I would have never been interested in motorcycles if I started with electric when I was 4.
I started on a real bike with a 3 speed AND a clutch. Engine noise and the smell of Klotz "Techniplate" back then was basically like smelling fresh baked Krispy Cremes to a fat kid.



3
kb228
Posts
6153
Joined
1/31/2018
Location
Mansfield, OH, USA
6/6/2019 12:21pm
gt80rider wrote:
You'll find press releases just like this daily............ so you need to dismiss them...... sure, new designs may grab another 1-7%, but nothing massive like what...
You'll find press releases just like this daily............ so you need to dismiss them...... sure, new designs may grab another 1-7%, but nothing massive like what we need on the order of 200% or greater.........

The problem is physics..... we've reached our limit as far as energy density can go cost effectively.... this was reached a decade and a half ago........

You will NOT see massive increases in energy density without a Massive breakthrough in energy storage tech at the atomic level....... this is very far away....... lets say at least 10 years........

Furthermore, the energy storage biz has a much larger issue..... we are running out of raw materials at a staggering rate...... Lithium, cobalt, magnesium, etc...... demand is skyrocketing, while supply dwindles and gets harder each day to secure.....
If we reached the limit 15 years ago, why are cellphones still getting more and more efficient with bigger battery capacities?

We always find little improvements in a lab setting and then take what we find and implement it in production. Theres improvements everyday.
early
Posts
9900
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
6/6/2019 12:51pm
77Moto wrote:
I would have never been interested in motorcycles if I started with electric when I was 4. I started on a real bike with a 3...
I would have never been interested in motorcycles if I started with electric when I was 4.
I started on a real bike with a 3 speed AND a clutch. Engine noise and the smell of Klotz "Techniplate" back then was basically like smelling fresh baked Krispy Cremes to a fat kid.



I bought my 1 year old a 6v 4-wheeler at Walmart for $50. He's learning how to ride it chasing the dogs around the living room. He gets the biggest grin on his face, he don't give a shit if it's electric or has too many wheels. He'll be moving to a strider next year and a powered bike the year after that. Maybe a pw50, maybe an electric, I don't think he is going to care either way.
8
davis224
Posts
7466
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Cornland, IL, USA
Fantasy
6/6/2019 1:09pm
And to think, one day you might have to rely on your personality instead!
6/6/2019 2:31pm
kb228 wrote:
If we reached the limit 15 years ago, why are cellphones still getting more and more efficient with bigger battery capacities? We always find little improvements...
If we reached the limit 15 years ago, why are cellphones still getting more and more efficient with bigger battery capacities?

We always find little improvements in a lab setting and then take what we find and implement it in production. Theres improvements everyday.
The storage capacity per gram of battery hasn't changed all that much. The cell phone manufacturers have made the devices themselves more efficient at using power..which allows them to get longer standby and talk times out of a smaller, lower capacity battery
1
6/6/2019 2:33pm
"Previous designs for sodium ion batteries did not accomplish an energy density as high as lithium ion. What the Germans did was make it possible to...



"Previous designs for sodium ion batteries did not accomplish an energy density as high as lithium ion. What the Germans did was make it possible to build the battery through dry deposition of materials, which increased reliability and reduced the price enormously, and also increased energy density enormously. If you look up sodium ion batteries you will get old material from 2018 where small research groups managed to make sodium ion batteries work, at a 20 percent cost savings per watt hour over lithium ion. What has happened in Germany is that with the new manufacturing tech, sodium ion batteries will now be practical, plus have a higher energy density than lithium ion, PLUS have a cost reduction of 80 or more percent over lithium ion.
What the Germans managed to do is invent a battery tech where the batteries are basically simply dry painted into existence the way cars are painted during manufacture now, which eliminated all the work and all the hazardous chemicals that have always been a part of the battery manufacturing process. The Germans got it down to a process as simple as painting a surface or printing a newspaper at super high speed, with results better than any battery we have now. There is a chance that in the near future, the cost of a battery for a car will be less than $1, 000 USD vs practically the entire cost of the car nowadays, and to top it all off, the car will go much much farther on a charge. Cost savings are not that drastic yet, but they are still enough to revolutionize electric cars.

I predict the technology will be allowed to proceed and won't be taken away the way so many other great technologies probably were. We will probably see this, and since the late R&D is happening via a major battery maker and not an isolated laboratory, it could hit the market very quickly.

The lithium in lithium ion batteries is a fairly rare metal. It is not a precious metal, but it is not common at all and carries a heavy cost premium. Sodium on the other hand is the most common of all metals, (unless you call hydrogen a metal) sodium is more common than even iron. It is also very easy to isolate as a metal, if you hit the right sourcing sodium is dirt cheap. Hydrogen is technically a metal but in a practical sense it is not, and can't be used in a battery the way metals that don't primarily exist as a gas can be used. Combining the abundance and cheapness of sodium with a manufacturing process that is basically as simple as printing toilet paper will have a MAJOR impact on battery prices, this will, if it comes to fruition, be a death sentence for gasoline powered cars. Electric cars will be cheaper and they will perform just as well.


New battery type: Sodium Ion
The report I have linked here does not even go into the significance of being able to use sodium - the bubble headed reporter, who probably flunked chemistry, missed it like a hail mary in a hurricane. But she at least reported there is a new battery making process. The real breakthrough however is that the process allows us to move from Lithium ion to Sodium ion batteries, and they are already making them. It does work. And it is a major battery manufacturer that is doing the proofing on this, not college kids. This will drastically increase energy density and sodium is the most common metal on earth that you can observe as metal at room temperature - it is DIRT CHEAP.
Sodium is more electropositive than Lithium, which means more energy can be stored by sodium. But it has not been possible to use sodium up until now because it is too soft and too reactive. Knowing the new advantages of the new manufacturing process, they did not even bother with lithium, they cut straight to sodium. That's a serious breakthrough. None of this is specifically pointed out in the linked report, you have to read between the lines to see it."

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Battery-Breakthrough-Solves-…

With KTM announcing the KJSC SX Junior program is going Electric next year, this should make for fun discussion..https://racerxonline.com/2019/06/05/insight-kjsc-going-electric
Maxwell technologies also has a dry film electrode coating process. Supposedly, that's why Tesla wants to acquire the company.
1
6/6/2019 3:12pm Edited Date/Time 6/6/2019 3:15pm
"Previous designs for sodium ion batteries did not accomplish an energy density as high as lithium ion. What the Germans did was make it possible to...



"Previous designs for sodium ion batteries did not accomplish an energy density as high as lithium ion. What the Germans did was make it possible to build the battery through dry deposition of materials, which increased reliability and reduced the price enormously, and also increased energy density enormously. If you look up sodium ion batteries you will get old material from 2018 where small research groups managed to make sodium ion batteries work, at a 20 percent cost savings per watt hour over lithium ion. What has happened in Germany is that with the new manufacturing tech, sodium ion batteries will now be practical, plus have a higher energy density than lithium ion, PLUS have a cost reduction of 80 or more percent over lithium ion.
What the Germans managed to do is invent a battery tech where the batteries are basically simply dry painted into existence the way cars are painted during manufacture now, which eliminated all the work and all the hazardous chemicals that have always been a part of the battery manufacturing process. The Germans got it down to a process as simple as painting a surface or printing a newspaper at super high speed, with results better than any battery we have now. There is a chance that in the near future, the cost of a battery for a car will be less than $1, 000 USD vs practically the entire cost of the car nowadays, and to top it all off, the car will go much much farther on a charge. Cost savings are not that drastic yet, but they are still enough to revolutionize electric cars.

I predict the technology will be allowed to proceed and won't be taken away the way so many other great technologies probably were. We will probably see this, and since the late R&D is happening via a major battery maker and not an isolated laboratory, it could hit the market very quickly.

The lithium in lithium ion batteries is a fairly rare metal. It is not a precious metal, but it is not common at all and carries a heavy cost premium. Sodium on the other hand is the most common of all metals, (unless you call hydrogen a metal) sodium is more common than even iron. It is also very easy to isolate as a metal, if you hit the right sourcing sodium is dirt cheap. Hydrogen is technically a metal but in a practical sense it is not, and can't be used in a battery the way metals that don't primarily exist as a gas can be used. Combining the abundance and cheapness of sodium with a manufacturing process that is basically as simple as printing toilet paper will have a MAJOR impact on battery prices, this will, if it comes to fruition, be a death sentence for gasoline powered cars. Electric cars will be cheaper and they will perform just as well.


New battery type: Sodium Ion
The report I have linked here does not even go into the significance of being able to use sodium - the bubble headed reporter, who probably flunked chemistry, missed it like a hail mary in a hurricane. But she at least reported there is a new battery making process. The real breakthrough however is that the process allows us to move from Lithium ion to Sodium ion batteries, and they are already making them. It does work. And it is a major battery manufacturer that is doing the proofing on this, not college kids. This will drastically increase energy density and sodium is the most common metal on earth that you can observe as metal at room temperature - it is DIRT CHEAP.
Sodium is more electropositive than Lithium, which means more energy can be stored by sodium. But it has not been possible to use sodium up until now because it is too soft and too reactive. Knowing the new advantages of the new manufacturing process, they did not even bother with lithium, they cut straight to sodium. That's a serious breakthrough. None of this is specifically pointed out in the linked report, you have to read between the lines to see it."

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Battery-Breakthrough-Solves-…

With KTM announcing the KJSC SX Junior program is going Electric next year, this should make for fun discussion..https://racerxonline.com/2019/06/05/insight-kjsc-going-electric
Maxwell technologies also has a dry film electrode coating process. Supposedly, that's why Tesla wants to acquire the company.
Tesla closed the deal. Tesla has been working with Maxwell for a while and once they achieved 500Wh per KG they started the process of buying them. For reference, Tesla is currently around 300Wh per KG with their 2170 cells.
3
6/6/2019 3:14pm Edited Date/Time 6/6/2019 3:20pm
gt80rider wrote:
You'll find press releases just like this daily............ so you need to dismiss them...... sure, new designs may grab another 1-7%, but nothing massive like what...
You'll find press releases just like this daily............ so you need to dismiss them...... sure, new designs may grab another 1-7%, but nothing massive like what we need on the order of 200% or greater.........

The problem is physics..... we've reached our limit as far as energy density can go cost effectively.... this was reached a decade and a half ago........

You will NOT see massive increases in energy density without a Massive breakthrough in energy storage tech at the atomic level....... this is very far away....... lets say at least 10 years........

Furthermore, the energy storage biz has a much larger issue..... we are running out of raw materials at a staggering rate...... Lithium, cobalt, magnesium, etc...... demand is skyrocketing, while supply dwindles and gets harder each day to secure.....
kb228 wrote:
If we reached the limit 15 years ago, why are cellphones still getting more and more efficient with bigger battery capacities? We always find little improvements...
If we reached the limit 15 years ago, why are cellphones still getting more and more efficient with bigger battery capacities?

We always find little improvements in a lab setting and then take what we find and implement it in production. Theres improvements everyday.
gt80rider doesn't live in the real world based on his post....


Energy density has increased 200% in the last 10 years and cost have went from $1200 per kWh to $150.00 . Also, these rare earth metals aren't really that rare and companies like Tesla are using 90% less today than they were 2 years ago. Elon has stated they will not use any sooner than later.
2
racerxx276
Posts
253
Joined
10/22/2015
Location
Boise, ID, USA
6/6/2019 3:41pm
racerxx276 wrote:
Yup, it would be awesome on my 80 mile, 6 hr rides... oh wait , that would only get me 1/4 way there... The LAST bike...
Yup, it would be awesome on my 80 mile, 6 hr rides...

oh wait , that would only get me 1/4 way there... The LAST bike I want to be on when riding in the wilderness is an electric bike...

The "advancement" from 2 stroke to 4 stroke was pure politics, as is the push of electric bikes...
And more $$
You ride 6 hours straight without taking any breaks? If so, you are the exception to the general offroad motorcycling population, and definitely need the range...
You ride 6 hours straight without taking any breaks? If so, you are the exception to the general offroad motorcycling population, and definitely need the range of a full sized enduro or loaded out dual sport. The Alta with 5.8KW battery lasts me over 2 hours dicking around in tight single track stuff. By that point I'm ready for a break anyway. Alta was working on an extended range dual sport that would have provided roughly 25-50% more range with a larger battery. It would of course came with a weight penalty but i think offroad guys would sacrifice a little weight penalty for added range, even on their gas bikes.

I don't agree with "more $$".... maybe its more money up front, but in the long run i suspect it will be cheaper. I have over 60 hours on my MXR and have only needed to change 80ml of gear oil. I spend more time tinkering with my 2 strokes and 4 strokes than i do riding them. With the Alta its the complete opposite... I spend way more time riding it than i do tinkering with it.

What is it worth to you to have a bike that requires less maintenance, allows you to ride in more areas without pissing people off (allowing you to ride more overall), and doesn't destroy your hearing?
My 300xcw really doesn't require a lot of maintenance .

Here in the mtn's a 40 mile loop takes close to 6 hrs with a lunch/water stop. Granted not everyone rides in the middle of nowhere.

BTW , I startle more people on the trail as they can't hear me coming with a 94 db silencer , which is a lot quieter at a lower rev.. We cut and clear all the trails so others ( like hikers) can use them also. The only ones who don't like us are the out of state environmentalists who bring lawsuits for ANY type of use of state and national forest. Gas or elec...
4
mikec265
Posts
1668
Joined
10/19/2015
Location
Edinboro, PA, USA
6/6/2019 3:44pm Edited Date/Time 6/6/2019 4:25pm
My 5 year old kid wants a fast electric bike bad. We had a 24 volt Razor and a Pw50 a year ago, then an xr50. He doesn't give a shit about electric vs gas. He just wants a fast bike with good suspension that he can touch the ground on. He really wants a fast electric bike so he can bs with me easier while we ride on our track at home. We've got a lowered KX65 and a Chinese 110 that's a little smaller right now. As far as we are concerned the KTM E-MINI can't get here fast enough. The KX works, but is still too big, the ching ching 110 wasn't meant for a track, an XR50 is too slow and under suspended, fast 50s are a nightmare, but that KTM E mini should be just right to go along with his Dad's Alta.
Electric kicks ass if you can build a track at home with neighbors.
Best option out there for our situation. I'll keep gas bikes for back ups and to build engine skills, but electric makes it easier to concentrate on body position and smooth technique, which transfers over to help go faster and safer on gas bikes too. All bikes have their place, and I like them all. Electric just happens to be my favorite. Even after a year the novelty hasn't worn off.
4
Sachmo831
Posts
253
Joined
10/7/2015
Location
South Bend, IN, USA
6/6/2019 3:56pm
Bike Rat wrote:
I’m excited for the electric revolution, especially with better battery technology. Personally don’t like the smell of gasoline or exhaust.. I think that electric vehicles/ bikes...
I’m excited for the electric revolution, especially with better battery technology. Personally don’t like the smell of gasoline or exhaust..

I think that electric vehicles/ bikes need to make a better sound. Something that doesn’t sound like a RC car! It’s an easy safety upgrade! Loud pipes save lives💨💨
Put a playing card in the spokes?
77Moto
Posts
512
Joined
1/31/2019
Location
CA
6/6/2019 4:25pm
Bike Rat wrote:
I’m excited for the electric revolution, especially with better battery technology. Personally don’t like the smell of gasoline or exhaust.. I think that electric vehicles/ bikes...
I’m excited for the electric revolution, especially with better battery technology. Personally don’t like the smell of gasoline or exhaust..

I think that electric vehicles/ bikes need to make a better sound. Something that doesn’t sound like a RC car! It’s an easy safety upgrade! Loud pipes save lives💨💨
Sachmo831 wrote:
Put a playing card in the spokes?
Looks just like a loud 4 stroke!

Post a reply to: New Battery Technology Sodium Ion

The Latest