Posts
143
Joined
8/2/2018
Location
Chandler, TX, USA
I noticed the new Factory Edition KTM's are going to come stock with a Floating Front Disc vs their Standard rigid mounted one that they have been using for years. Does anyone know if there is a different feel or performance gain from one to another?
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Ever noticed when your holding a bike with a floating rotor and holding the brake. Move it back n forth the headtube feels slightly loose? That's the rotor moving.
The oversized part 270 or 280 is what helps with heat. I run the Galffer lightweight 270 floating rotor.
The issue I have run into on non floating - is if the rotor bends even a tiny bit - the brakes are nearly un usable.
It opens the pads while not under braking - and requires the lever be "pumped" up to get back to braking power - then under that braking situation with the bend it screws up the force applied unevenly.
While a bent rotor isn't good at all for either system - during a moto a smalll bend in a floating rotor can be ridden to finish easier. the floating element also makes a bend less likely with the added give.
If I were purely on feel - for me - non floating (working correctly).
But on average every day riding - floating generally better IMHO.
For using in road racing where the guys come 300km/h ,
on a corner after corner after corner so the build up heat can go away.
Useless in mx, only will get dirt between the rings. the disk won't get hot enuff to expand.
Just a waste of money. Well that was a racer who told me that.
280mm disk, Steel-braided lines with fresh brake fluid and some good sintered pads for stopping power.
Post a reply to: Rigid vs Floating Disc