Kove MX 450

yardsailor
Posts
700
Joined
1/3/2024
Location
Rochester, MN, USA
7/10/2026 3:34pm
Dave v3.0 wrote:
The Japanese weren't trying to undermine the American economy back then and Dr. Deming, an American, fixed their quality issues.  So much so that their highest...

The Japanese weren't trying to undermine the American economy back then and Dr. Deming, an American, fixed their quality issues.  So much so that their highest award for quality is named after him. The Chinese wouldn't know Kaizen if it hit them in the face.

Toyota has done very well and created their own production and parts process that is replicated globally. 
Toyota is best known for pioneering the Toyota Production System (TPS), the foundation of modern Lean Manufacturing. This system transformed global industry by focusing on Just-In-Time (JIT) production to eliminate waste, continuous improvement (Kaizen), and absolute quality control at every stage of the assembly line.
Every motorcycle manufacturer has some products made in China. 

Japanese anyday. 
Chinese probably not yet. 

2
Paul333
Posts
2203
Joined
2/15/2012
Location
Virginia Beach, VA, USA
10 hours ago

Hint: Never buy a dirt bike built in a country you can poop in the street....

1
5
3strokemx
Posts
2697
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
9 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Hint: Never buy a dirt bike built in a country you can poop in the street....

That rules out the USA!

7
Jabe
Posts
126
Joined
10/31/2023
Location
Ulm, DE
9 hours ago

All mx bikes are a knock off each other.

There are different grades of Chinese a quality.

Everyone made that statement when the Japenese bikes first arrived.

I still think every established mx manufacturer has spent countless efforts to bring innovation to the forefront (Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki, KTM, etc. even Beta/Ducati/Triumph) And actually not trying to copy too much off of each other staying true to their identity.

Where as this looks more like a pick and chose from all established brands innovation and features to create a Frankenstein. Maybe it rides great but I would not bet on it.

2
3

The Shop

30minmotos
Posts
1035
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun, MD, USA
7 hours ago

All mx bikes are a knock off each other.

There are different grades of Chinese a quality.

Everyone made that statement when the Japenese bikes first arrived.

Jabe wrote:
I still think every established mx manufacturer has spent countless efforts to bring innovation to the forefront (Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki, KTM, etc. even Beta/Ducati/Triumph) And actually...

I still think every established mx manufacturer has spent countless efforts to bring innovation to the forefront (Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki, KTM, etc. even Beta/Ducati/Triumph) And actually not trying to copy too much off of each other staying true to their identity.

Where as this looks more like a pick and chose from all established brands innovation and features to create a Frankenstein. Maybe it rides great but I would not bet on it.

Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame like a Yamaha


What are you even saying exactly.


Only so many ways to skin a cat.

Jabe
Posts
126
Joined
10/31/2023
Location
Ulm, DE
6 hours ago Edited Date/Time 6 hours ago
30minmotos wrote:
Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame...

Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame like a Yamaha


What are you even saying exactly.


Only so many ways to skin a cat.

what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through RnD and one off factory bikes (this is obviously only applicable to the big japanese 4 and KTM). Here is a very short list from the top of my head, the internet and probably contains some errors:


- suzuki: full floater, first EFI in a 450 (not totally sure)
- honda: productionised alloy frame, CNC machined swingarm parts, electronic exhaust valve (2t)
- yamaha: 5 valve fourstroke, reverse engine design
- Kawasaki: honestly here I am lost, dont know what tech or features they introduced first;exhaust valve on a 500; maybe perimeter frame from 90
- KTM: standard hydrolic clutch, e-start, OEM "works parts" available for the public (SXS), t-clamp offset changable from the factory
- Ducati: nothing in MX, but the desmo valve train, extensive RnD for their superbikes and motogp bikes
- Triumph: nothing in MX, they develop and supply engines for moto 2

what I am trying to say is, every one of those manufacturers had to (and still do) go through a long phase of advancing their motorcycle technology through decades, at least in my opinion.

where does Kove fit in that? genuine question

soggy
Posts
8774
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
6 hours ago
30minmotos wrote:
Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame...

Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame like a Yamaha


What are you even saying exactly.


Only so many ways to skin a cat.

Jabe wrote:
what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through...

what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through RnD and one off factory bikes (this is obviously only applicable to the big japanese 4 and KTM). Here is a very short list from the top of my head, the internet and probably contains some errors:


- suzuki: full floater, first EFI in a 450 (not totally sure)
- honda: productionised alloy frame, CNC machined swingarm parts, electronic exhaust valve (2t)
- yamaha: 5 valve fourstroke, reverse engine design
- Kawasaki: honestly here I am lost, dont know what tech or features they introduced first;exhaust valve on a 500; maybe perimeter frame from 90
- KTM: standard hydrolic clutch, e-start, OEM "works parts" available for the public (SXS), t-clamp offset changable from the factory
- Ducati: nothing in MX, but the desmo valve train, extensive RnD for their superbikes and motogp bikes
- Triumph: nothing in MX, they develop and supply engines for moto 2

what I am trying to say is, every one of those manufacturers had to (and still do) go through a long phase of advancing their motorcycle technology through decades, at least in my opinion.

where does Kove fit in that? genuine question

Those OEM’s have been making MX bikes for about 60 years. Kove has been doing it for only a few. I think it’s good they didn’t try to reinvent the wheel. If they truly want to be a player in the pro ranks and be taken seriously they will continue to develop and improve. Or they will go by wayside. Cool thing is we get to sit back and watch.

1
Wo Phat
Posts
167
Joined
3/11/2023
Location
Montgomery, AL, USA
6 hours ago
Flatliner wrote:

When 999blazer (english youtube bike guy) did a review on it, the first one had issues right out of the box.  With Kove mechanics there.

btw that guy does a great job with his channel....loved the YZM big bore build

2
6 hours ago

Big Honda knock off

Not worth real bike money for China bike quality 

Show your work.

3
3strokemx
Posts
2697
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
6 hours ago
30minmotos wrote:
Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame...

Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame like a Yamaha


What are you even saying exactly.


Only so many ways to skin a cat.

Jabe wrote:
what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through...

what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through RnD and one off factory bikes (this is obviously only applicable to the big japanese 4 and KTM). Here is a very short list from the top of my head, the internet and probably contains some errors:


- suzuki: full floater, first EFI in a 450 (not totally sure)
- honda: productionised alloy frame, CNC machined swingarm parts, electronic exhaust valve (2t)
- yamaha: 5 valve fourstroke, reverse engine design
- Kawasaki: honestly here I am lost, dont know what tech or features they introduced first;exhaust valve on a 500; maybe perimeter frame from 90
- KTM: standard hydrolic clutch, e-start, OEM "works parts" available for the public (SXS), t-clamp offset changable from the factory
- Ducati: nothing in MX, but the desmo valve train, extensive RnD for their superbikes and motogp bikes
- Triumph: nothing in MX, they develop and supply engines for moto 2

what I am trying to say is, every one of those manufacturers had to (and still do) go through a long phase of advancing their motorcycle technology through decades, at least in my opinion.

where does Kove fit in that? genuine question

Cannondale and BMW developed unique features, so that criteria alone is not the recipe for a good bike

4
1
30minmotos
Posts
1035
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun, MD, USA
6 hours ago
Jabe wrote:
what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through...

what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through RnD and one off factory bikes (this is obviously only applicable to the big japanese 4 and KTM). Here is a very short list from the top of my head, the internet and probably contains some errors:


- suzuki: full floater, first EFI in a 450 (not totally sure)
- honda: productionised alloy frame, CNC machined swingarm parts, electronic exhaust valve (2t)
- yamaha: 5 valve fourstroke, reverse engine design
- Kawasaki: honestly here I am lost, dont know what tech or features they introduced first;exhaust valve on a 500; maybe perimeter frame from 90
- KTM: standard hydrolic clutch, e-start, OEM "works parts" available for the public (SXS), t-clamp offset changable from the factory
- Ducati: nothing in MX, but the desmo valve train, extensive RnD for their superbikes and motogp bikes
- Triumph: nothing in MX, they develop and supply engines for moto 2

what I am trying to say is, every one of those manufacturers had to (and still do) go through a long phase of advancing their motorcycle technology through decades, at least in my opinion.

where does Kove fit in that? genuine question

Yeah dude idk your point still.


Yamaha uses 4 valve heads now, is that copying the other brands that used 4 valve heads?


Almost every brand uses alloy frames now, is that copying Hondas frames?


Everything has electric start and hydro clutch is that copying Ktm?


Beta uses a frame that looks like Ktm is that copying?


Triumph literally did copy Ktm engines is that copying? And the frame looks like the 09 yz250f frame is that copying?


On and on and on and on

Or is it only when kove does it?


I’m not even a kove fan your argument is just wild.

2
6 hours ago

Im.not paying 8000 for a 4500 dollar bike. 

2
6 hours ago
30minmotos wrote:
Yeah dude idk your point still.Yamaha uses 4 valve heads now, is that copying the other brands that used 4 valve heads?Almost every brand uses alloy...

Yeah dude idk your point still.


Yamaha uses 4 valve heads now, is that copying the other brands that used 4 valve heads?


Almost every brand uses alloy frames now, is that copying Hondas frames?


Everything has electric start and hydro clutch is that copying Ktm?


Beta uses a frame that looks like Ktm is that copying?


Triumph literally did copy Ktm engines is that copying? And the frame looks like the 09 yz250f frame is that copying?


On and on and on and on

Or is it only when kove does it?


I’m not even a kove fan your argument is just wild.

Beta, KTM, Ducati, Aprilia, Brembo, Marchesini all purchase hard parts from the same machine shop/Mfg facility  in northern Italy.   

Wo Phat
Posts
167
Joined
3/11/2023
Location
Montgomery, AL, USA
6 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Hint: Never buy a dirt bike built in a country you can poop in the street....

good point.....do we now have a dilemma with the KTM? did they announce some production would move to India?

SmokinJoe439
Posts
2390
Joined
3/7/2012
Location
Renton, WA, USA
6 hours ago Edited Date/Time 6 hours ago

The other brands innovate the Chinese one's just copy the known formula. 

I've seen a couple cfmoto in person the welds and fasteners look lower grade. 

 

1
1
HondaTech25
Posts
109
Joined
3/12/2026
Location
Maysville, KY, USA
5 hours ago

Big Honda knock off

Not worth real bike money for China bike quality 

Show your work.

Working on Jap bikes for 20 years, that's me showing my work 

3
1
3strokemx
Posts
2697
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
5 hours ago

Im.not paying 8000 for a 4500 dollar bike. 

Like $3k of that is tariffs, so price could come down dramatically at some point in the future

1
3strokemx
Posts
2697
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
5 hours ago

Big Honda knock off

Not worth real bike money for China bike quality 

Show your work.

Working on Jap bikes for 20 years, that's me showing my work 

That is a logical fallacy called the appeal to authority. 

"Trust me bro"

People with valid experience don't have a hard time giving examples.

3
HondaTech25
Posts
109
Joined
3/12/2026
Location
Maysville, KY, USA
4 hours ago

Show your work.

Working on Jap bikes for 20 years, that's me showing my work 

3strokemx wrote:

That is a logical fallacy called the appeal to authority. 

"Trust me bro"

People with valid experience don't have a hard time giving examples.

This is me not giving a fuck about proving my experience to any random person on the internet who tries to use stupid phrases to explain themselves.

China junk is China junk for a reason.

1
2
Paul333
Posts
2203
Joined
2/15/2012
Location
Virginia Beach, VA, USA
4 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Hint: Never buy a dirt bike built in a country you can poop in the street....

3strokemx wrote:

That rules out the USA!

Crack addicts don't set the standards. 

In China anyone can poop in public and it's fine. 

3
Paul333
Posts
2203
Joined
2/15/2012
Location
Virginia Beach, VA, USA
4 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Hint: Never buy a dirt bike built in a country you can poop in the street....

Wo Phat wrote:

good point.....do we now have a dilemma with the KTM? did they announce some production would move to India?

Yes, I love KTM but when full production of the high end bikes goes to India I won't be paying a premium for KTM anymore. 

3strokemx
Posts
2697
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
4 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Hint: Never buy a dirt bike built in a country you can poop in the street....

3strokemx wrote:

That rules out the USA!

Paul333 wrote:

Crack addicts don't set the standards. 

In China anyone can poop in public and it's fine. 

So you're saying China has more freedom than us?   I don't like where you're taking this conversation.

1
visser62
Posts
2505
Joined
5/2/2013
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
4 hours ago

It's only copying when my frail American ego is threatened by a country that is run much more efficiently and keeps its capitalists in check.

1
1
OleTex2
Posts
591
Joined
8/12/2021
Location
Central, TX, USA
Fantasy
4 hours ago
30minmotos wrote:
Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame...

Explain how it’s different than kawi copying Ktms airbox, Brembos, smooth linear power, hydraulic clutch, estart, or triumphs engine look like a Ktm, or the frame like a Yamaha


What are you even saying exactly.


Only so many ways to skin a cat.

Jabe wrote:
what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through...

what I mean is throughout history (lets say 1980-today) every one of those manufacturers had developed unique features which they brought to the consumer level through RnD and one off factory bikes (this is obviously only applicable to the big japanese 4 and KTM). Here is a very short list from the top of my head, the internet and probably contains some errors:


- suzuki: full floater, first EFI in a 450 (not totally sure)
- honda: productionised alloy frame, CNC machined swingarm parts, electronic exhaust valve (2t)
- yamaha: 5 valve fourstroke, reverse engine design
- Kawasaki: honestly here I am lost, dont know what tech or features they introduced first;exhaust valve on a 500; maybe perimeter frame from 90
- KTM: standard hydrolic clutch, e-start, OEM "works parts" available for the public (SXS), t-clamp offset changable from the factory
- Ducati: nothing in MX, but the desmo valve train, extensive RnD for their superbikes and motogp bikes
- Triumph: nothing in MX, they develop and supply engines for moto 2

what I am trying to say is, every one of those manufacturers had to (and still do) go through a long phase of advancing their motorcycle technology through decades, at least in my opinion.

where does Kove fit in that? genuine question

Kawasaki came out with the Uni Track rear suspension. 

MOTO13
Posts
568
Joined
12/22/2017
Location
Elkhorn, WI, USA
4 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Hint: Never buy a dirt bike built in a country you can poop in the street....

Ohhh, so never buy an American bike. Got it. 

1
Paul333
Posts
2203
Joined
2/15/2012
Location
Virginia Beach, VA, USA
3 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:

That rules out the USA!

Paul333 wrote:

Crack addicts don't set the standards. 

In China anyone can poop in public and it's fine. 

3strokemx wrote:

So you're saying China has more freedom than us?   I don't like where you're taking this conversation.

Pooping in the street isn't "Freedom"

 

It's a lack of civilization

3strokemx
Posts
2697
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
3 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Crack addicts don't set the standards. 

In China anyone can poop in public and it's fine. 

3strokemx wrote:

So you're saying China has more freedom than us?   I don't like where you're taking this conversation.

Paul333 wrote:

Pooping in the street isn't "Freedom"

 

It's a lack of civilization

How do they have streets without civilization?

1
MOTO13
Posts
568
Joined
12/22/2017
Location
Elkhorn, WI, USA
3 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Crack addicts don't set the standards. 

In China anyone can poop in public and it's fine. 

You 100%...have not one fkng clue what you are talking about. In fact, it is quite illegal to do so in China.

1
Wo Phat
Posts
167
Joined
3/11/2023
Location
Montgomery, AL, USA
2 hours ago
Paul333 wrote:

Crack addicts don't set the standards. 

In China anyone can poop in public and it's fine. 

MOTO13 wrote:

You 100%...have not one fkng clue what you are talking about. In fact, it is quite illegal to do so in China.

maybe, but it smells really bad there....no shit

Post a reply to: Kove MX 450

The Latest