Jody, MXA, Two Strokes and Matthes

Indy mxer
Posts
1839
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL US
1/14/2011 6:03am
Yes, imo, it is better. No way would I go back to a 125 or a 250 2T.
I like riding a 250F much more.
1/14/2011 6:05am
In my area 2 strokes are very hard to find. I had to drive 4 states away to get one last April. No dealers in this area have them, and if they do, when you show up they want an additional 15% over retail to sell it to you. My local dealer only gets 1-2 2 strokes a year from yamaha, but they say they get 3-4 calls a week of people looking for them.. All the while they have same '09,'10,and '11 models on the floor that they cant seem to move. At the local tracks its still majority 4 stroke, but the 2 strokes are starting to increase in number. The guys who are riding 4 strokes, and NOT complaining about the cost to own them, are the guys showing up in the 100K rigs, full of bikes anyways so I dont think they really care.

It was also commented by rmgsxr i think that his parts sales are down with the 4 strokes.. Honestly I can totally see this as maintence on the 4 stroke seemingly fits well with the lazier breed of riders riding them. On a 2 stroke, as the top end wore out, you could feel the bike getting weaker. Rebuilds are as easy as changing parts, so what the heck, drop a Ben Franklin, and you are good to go in less than a few hours in your garage. On the 4 stroke, it never gets that tired feeling, right up till the second it locks up. This is why resale is so horrible on them. You get the owner who has rode the bike the last 2 years, putt-putting around in the woods or track, but has racked up alot of hours on the bike. He never has one lick of problems and when the new owner buys it he does so with confidence b/c the bike is still tight feeling since it has never been rode hard. If he is a fast A or B rider, the bike is now a ticking time bomb, and the rebuild process is involved enough that most riders arent going to do a top end as preventative maintence.

On the 4 stroke you not only have to change the piston/rings and gaskets like the 2 stroke, but you have to check/replace other things like the timing chain, valve lash, valve guides,seals, and seats. Most weekend warriors dont have the tools needed to do these types of services, so the bike has to go to the dealer.. Or they just keep riding the bike, b/c it still feels tight and fresh, even though it has a ton of hrs on it and then the motor locks up without warning. Suddenly it will cost more to fix the bike than its worth

This is the problem with the 2 vs 4 debate.. Just as the reason the problem wont be fixed is about money, the problems are about money as well. MX has finally gotten to a price point where people are finding other hobbies, and cheaper forms of recreation. For me personally, $6500 is pretty much the max that I will spend on a motorcycle, and as soon as my dealer starts having to sell me new bikes over that cost I will start buying used. Alot of that is our fault though as the US dollar is very weak to the yen.

People can argue that the rules in PRO racing have no bearing on local racing. BUt they do... For most, they get into racing with dreams of becomming a professional one day. As a dreamer you emulate(sp) everything you see the pro's do, including what machinery they are on, in an effort to get to their level. Thats why the fix for this sport has to start there...Unfortunately the powers that be are to worried about maintaining the status quo, even if it means making the ship sink faster
1/14/2011 6:10am
CamP wrote:
Would it make any difference to your sales if you had new 250T's on the showroom that retailed for $5,995?
rmgsxr wrote:
Right now, no I don't think it would make a difference. There are killer deals on new MX bikes that are not moving just like there...
Right now, no I don't think it would make a difference. There are killer deals on new MX bikes that are not moving just like there are killer deals on GSX-Rs and CB-Rs(and everything else) that are not selling. Shit ain't selling for me. But all of the families that tell me that they don't have enough money to go racing sure do have a pile of high dollar Iphones in their pockets. In business right now I don't consider it to be a two stroke/four stroke thing. Hell, high speed internet and cell phone bills are my competition. The KTM dealer that I get my kids 65s from has had some issues the last year with numbers being down and are doing a big change to survive. If Suzuki or Honda would come out with a new two stroke 250 I don't think it would be $5995 and I don't seem to have a lot of customers saying that they wish that they would come out with them. I wish two stroke sales would pick back up because my parts sales would come back up. People don't do top ends and buy parts like they used to. I am telling guys all the time that they should do a top end for preventative maintenance on their four stroke and they think I'm stupid. I stock more pistons, rings and top end parts for RM85s than I do the four stroke models.



Long story that I will try and make short. I have a brand new 2008 RM250 that I have been holding for a guy for close to two years. It sat on the floor for almost a year before he left a deposit on it. I recently started passing the word that I was going to sell it. Posted it on here and it got around plenty that it was for sale. I did not post price I told people to call. I had 5 people call interested in it over a six week period. Not to much interest. I know it is not a new model but still competitive with a new Yamaha. Maybe it didn't help that at the local level the two strokes that have raced in the A class haven't fared so well. I fought the change but it did go to a run what you brung just as long as its under the cc amount.



We sell Suzuki and Honda and In the last three months(winter time) we have sold maybe 25 or 30 MX bikes so we are not huge but I don't think a new inexpensive two stroke would have changed it much.



What my business needs more than anything is an open riding area for the play riders to go to. That would help me more than anything.
Indy mxer wrote:
Good post rmgsxr. My brother is a dealer over here in Indiana and would say the same thing. He went through a similar situation with a...
Good post rmgsxr.

My brother is a dealer over here in Indiana and would say the same thing.

He went through a similar situation with a brand new RM 250 a couple years ago.

It sat unsold for quite a while. He finally sold it to another dealer.



I just don't see this big customer demand for 2 strokes everyone is talking about.

Not in our area anyway. And yes, around here dealers do have them.



I think if you polled the riders, at least 90% would not give up their 4 strokes to go to a 2T.



As a dealer , I think you would agree, if the OEM's thought for a minute they could sell a bunch of them and make money, they would sell them again.

But they're not going to put a lot of money into R&D for new generation of 2 strokes if they don't believe there's a demand for them. Especially in this economic environment.

It's kind of the chicken or the egg.



I don't know why guys are bitching anyway? At the amateur level you can ride all 250's together. Who cares about the pros.

i can tell you what is moving USED smokers, every time i go to the track i see more and more showing up with them and it sure seems to me like a growing trend.. people are starting to wise up. thats one of the beautiful things about the yz250 its damn near perfect bike and parts will interchange from 05 to 11 you can find used parts real easy if you look cheap. sure helps keep it affordable if you ask me.
seth505
Posts
10172
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
1/14/2011 6:39am
JB 19, not trying to say you are wrong but in the 90s I worked a paper route and worked as a dish washer to afford racing and save up for a new bike. I remember my first brand new bike was a 94 yz80. I forget but the retail was like 2800 or so and I got it from a shop for like 400 under, so around 2500 bucks and I paid cash. That felt good. Never got another brand new bike until my 09 yz 250 last year.

The Shop

Indy mxer
Posts
1839
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL US
1/14/2011 6:39am
I would agree with you guys about used 4 strokes. Especially the ones that were not taken care of and have many hours on them. They are money pits. And that is a downside.
But I still don't see this big demand for 2 strokes, not around here anyway.

Do you guys really think Honda, Kaw and Suz are that stupid.
Again, if they would see a huge demand for 2 strokes, they'll be on dealer floors tomorrow! After all, it's all about making money.

And as far as prices go, everything is high. I just bought a new Kawasaki Teryx side by side. I got a good deal and still paid about 11 grand for it. Shit, I paid 21k for a new HD Fatboy back in 2001.
MX is still one of the cheapest forms of racing. I know guys who have paid as much money for their F***ing mountain bikes and road bicycles as I did for my 250F.
It's all relative.

And finally, not everyone starts riding and aspires to be a pro. Just like people don't take up golf hoping to make the PGA Tour. A large percentage got into it for the fun of competing or just riding.

But, in a perfect world, it would be cool to have really modern 2 strokes as an option from all the OEM's.
Unfortunately, that's not reality.



hellion
Posts
1086
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
1/14/2011 6:43am
The demand for two strokes in New England seems high. Try to find a YZ250 or any KTM two stroke and you need to be quick. They sell fast. I'd love a new 150SX but they are gone already.
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA US
1/14/2011 6:57am Edited Date/Time 1/14/2011 6:58am
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and out gunned, but there is still hope. How much more of a chance would he have if he had at least 25 or 50cc? Many people just say "Why doesn't he just race a 4-stroke?" The point is that he should at least have a choice.



Contrary to some on here I don't hate DC, I just think he's a little fearful of making any waves with anyone about 2-strokes. 2-strokes aren't the savior of SX or MX, its would just be nice to see the displacement raised a little, or have some inclusion at the Pro level.



DC and FTE have not answered the question - Are the current rules in the AMA ProRacing Rulebook fair for the 2-stroke?



rocrac
Posts
2454
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Indianapolis, IN US
1/14/2011 7:05am Edited Date/Time 1/14/2011 7:11am
kaboom645 wrote:
In my area 2 strokes are very hard to find. I had to drive 4 states away to get one last April. No dealers in this...
In my area 2 strokes are very hard to find. I had to drive 4 states away to get one last April. No dealers in this area have them, and if they do, when you show up they want an additional 15% over retail to sell it to you. My local dealer only gets 1-2 2 strokes a year from yamaha, but they say they get 3-4 calls a week of people looking for them.. All the while they have same '09,'10,and '11 models on the floor that they cant seem to move. At the local tracks its still majority 4 stroke, but the 2 strokes are starting to increase in number. The guys who are riding 4 strokes, and NOT complaining about the cost to own them, are the guys showing up in the 100K rigs, full of bikes anyways so I dont think they really care.

It was also commented by rmgsxr i think that his parts sales are down with the 4 strokes.. Honestly I can totally see this as maintence on the 4 stroke seemingly fits well with the lazier breed of riders riding them. On a 2 stroke, as the top end wore out, you could feel the bike getting weaker. Rebuilds are as easy as changing parts, so what the heck, drop a Ben Franklin, and you are good to go in less than a few hours in your garage. On the 4 stroke, it never gets that tired feeling, right up till the second it locks up. This is why resale is so horrible on them. You get the owner who has rode the bike the last 2 years, putt-putting around in the woods or track, but has racked up alot of hours on the bike. He never has one lick of problems and when the new owner buys it he does so with confidence b/c the bike is still tight feeling since it has never been rode hard. If he is a fast A or B rider, the bike is now a ticking time bomb, and the rebuild process is involved enough that most riders arent going to do a top end as preventative maintence.

On the 4 stroke you not only have to change the piston/rings and gaskets like the 2 stroke, but you have to check/replace other things like the timing chain, valve lash, valve guides,seals, and seats. Most weekend warriors dont have the tools needed to do these types of services, so the bike has to go to the dealer.. Or they just keep riding the bike, b/c it still feels tight and fresh, even though it has a ton of hrs on it and then the motor locks up without warning. Suddenly it will cost more to fix the bike than its worth

This is the problem with the 2 vs 4 debate.. Just as the reason the problem wont be fixed is about money, the problems are about money as well. MX has finally gotten to a price point where people are finding other hobbies, and cheaper forms of recreation. For me personally, $6500 is pretty much the max that I will spend on a motorcycle, and as soon as my dealer starts having to sell me new bikes over that cost I will start buying used. Alot of that is our fault though as the US dollar is very weak to the yen.

People can argue that the rules in PRO racing have no bearing on local racing. BUt they do... For most, they get into racing with dreams of becomming a professional one day. As a dreamer you emulate(sp) everything you see the pro's do, including what machinery they are on, in an effort to get to their level. Thats why the fix for this sport has to start there...Unfortunately the powers that be are to worried about maintaining the status quo, even if it means making the ship sink faster
Excellent post...my 2 strokes friends are getting bent over for bikes and parts for 2 strokes now because of supply and demand.

I have 2 2008 4 strokes collecting dust. Too expensive to rebuild, not worth anything to sell and I cannot afford new ones. Were done.
gaines1016
Posts
98
Joined
6/8/2010
Location
Sioux City, IA US
1/14/2011 7:05am
you all wanna know why there are less people racing? it isnt the cost of the bike.

the single biggest expense to go racing for the year is travel/lodging. gas is up to 3 bucks a gallon.

then you have to compare the kids of todays generation to the kids of the previous generations. i think you can split them into 2 categories now:

the ultra competitive team sports kids. organized sports has evolved into a totally different animal then it was years ago. gone are the days where football was played for two months in the fall and you had the summers to do what you want. now you have summer leagues and traveling leagues for every sport plus pro style camps for everything down to damn near t-ball. everybody thinks they are going to make it big now and get the full ride scholarship and go pro.

then you have the kids who dont really do much of anything outside the house. the xbox and playstation kids who would rather play atv vs mx on the tv then actually go outside and participate. when i was young the neighborhoods had constant kid activities going on. kids on bicycles were all over. streets are barren in my neighborhood today. today we have to have god damn tv commercials asking kids to go out and play. are you f-ing kidding me.

both these groups have their iphones, mp3 players, ipads, laptops, flat screen tvs in their bedrooms, stereos, etc. hell, i can drive past a highschool parking lot and most kids have a nicer car then i do now days.

so in many instances the money would be there to participate in this sport, but those funds are being allocated for different things. no conspiracy just different priorities for many.
hellion
Posts
1086
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
1/14/2011 7:08am Edited Date/Time 1/14/2011 7:13am
hellion
Posts
1086
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
1/14/2011 7:12am
burn1986 wrote:
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and...
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and out gunned, but there is still hope. How much more of a chance would he have if he had at least 25 or 50cc? Many people just say "Why doesn't he just race a 4-stroke?" The point is that he should at least have a choice.



Contrary to some on here I don't hate DC, I just think he's a little fearful of making any waves with anyone about 2-strokes. 2-strokes aren't the savior of SX or MX, its would just be nice to see the displacement raised a little, or have some inclusion at the Pro level.



DC and FTE have not answered the question - Are the current rules in the AMA ProRacing Rulebook fair for the 2-stroke?



I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is doing. We just wish to make an impression on him that will help him make some positive changes.
gaines1016
Posts
98
Joined
6/8/2010
Location
Sioux City, IA US
1/14/2011 7:16am
hellion wrote:
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is...
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is doing. We just wish to make an impression on him that will help him make some positive changes.
if thats the case you are doing it wrong
151
Posts
536
Joined
9/15/2009
Location
Olive Branch, MS US
1/14/2011 7:27am
hellion wrote:
It seems like the hip thing to do to bash Jody and MXA these days. He's older than the other current editors, seems to be grouchy...
It seems like the hip thing to do to bash Jody and MXA these days. He's older than the other current editors, seems to be grouchy, and is set in his ways.

On the other hand he lives for Moto, still races and rides weekly, and has vast experience with the machinery we ride and the people who are responsible for building it. Plus he is not afraid to speak his mind regardless of who he offends.

Lately he has really been pushing the two stroke issue. He has been in the sport longer than just about anyone, has seen where it's been, and has a good idea about where it's going. I applaud him for using his voice to make a difference. For a long time I've thought this two stroke vs. four stroke argument was futile. The four stroke was being crammed down out throats and there was nothing we could do about it. But these threads keep popping up more and more regularly, and more and more two strokes keep showing up at the tracks and trails. Surely the manufacturers must be feeling the sting of decreased sales. KTM can't keep their two stroke line in stock though. Is anyone paying attention at the wheel.

I see now that the main problem is the AMA, and their resistance to change a simple rule. Sure, all the manufacturers would have a fit at first, but ten years from now when the sport is growing again they will see this as a landmark moment in our sports history. Make the 450 class a true 450 class, two strokes and four strokes up to 450 cc's. The same with the 250's. And for gods sake bring back the 125 class. Kids moving off 85's onto 250f's makes so little sense it's unbelievable.

I'm dating myself here, but when I was coming up we used to have four classes. 100's, 125's, 250's, and open. And all the experts raced all the classes. Bikes were relativeley cheap, and you'd race half the year in 100's and 250's, and the other half on 125's and open's. And you know what? The 100's were a freaking blast to race. Sure they were slow, but man you had to wring that thing out and be real creative and smart with line choice and race craft. You should have seen JoJo Keller make a 100 go, and he was a pretty big boy even then. The racing was both affordable and exciting to watch or participate in.

I know Steve Matthes is working at Racer X again and he probably likes his job and doesn't want to piss Davey off too much. But I've even heard him complain that four strokes have ruined racing. And he's just talking about it as a pure spectator. He is so right. Go on youtube and look up any race from the 90's and tell me it's not way more exciting than todays racing where they crawl through the corner and then blast off leaping the whole straight. Watch Reed ride his YZ250 and appreciate an awesome display of talent, or RC just flogging his KX and swapping and bucking and never letting off. You can't ride a 450 like that, you'd get splattered. It makes the racing boring when there is only one guy (JS) willing to hang onto a 450 on the limit.

I guess that if we speak with our wallets we can eventually effect a change here. But it will be slow and the sport will suffer greatly in the meantime. The AMA could make the change happen a lot faster, but do they have the balls? I doubt it.
MTNR

Are you sure you have your story straight? Gas was at RECORD highs in 1981 RECORD HIGHS.

Adjusted for inflation gas was something like 3.30 a gallon. Minimum wage was a little over 3 dollars an hour. What did you get for a yard?

A new bike was about 1500 bucks. How many yards were you cutting? And unless I am wrong you only cut grass in spring and summer right? Usually on weekends too? When did you race?

Kurt
Posts
69
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV US
1/14/2011 7:41am
hellion wrote:
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is...
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is doing. We just wish to make an impression on him that will help him make some positive changes.
gaines1016 wrote:
if thats the case you are doing it wrong
Hopefully all are not as sensitive as you. The anti-establishment-to establishment comment from Hellion rings true. Most that sell out get flak, DC probably knows that.
A complete revamp should happen, then the common fan will enjoy things as they were when the last surge of off-road/mx happened. For those around then, you'll recall a recession was in full swing from the mid to late '70's, and didn't slow things down.
Consider the price for sx tickets the last few years, ads to excess in the mags, etc.
I'd love to see a little fat trimmed from the "sport".
This sport hardly needs growing, as depicted by the powers that be.
rmgsxr
Posts
526
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Oak Grove, MO US
1/14/2011 7:43am
burn1986 wrote:
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and...
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and out gunned, but there is still hope. How much more of a chance would he have if he had at least 25 or 50cc? Many people just say "Why doesn't he just race a 4-stroke?" The point is that he should at least have a choice.



Contrary to some on here I don't hate DC, I just think he's a little fearful of making any waves with anyone about 2-strokes. 2-strokes aren't the savior of SX or MX, its would just be nice to see the displacement raised a little, or have some inclusion at the Pro level.



DC and FTE have not answered the question - Are the current rules in the AMA ProRacing Rulebook fair for the 2-stroke?



hellion wrote:
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is...
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is doing. We just wish to make an impression on him that will help him make some positive changes.
Did you guys read what DC wrote?

It is not about what he believes to be fair on rules right now. If he changes the rules and the manufactures don't like the rules and just stay home, where does that leave the sport right now? Kawasaki pays the Pro Circuit riders salaries so how do you think it would help if Kawasaki decided to stay home. There are not enough JGRs out there to fill the spots.

Don't know who follows Road Racing but it got pretty thin when DMG thought they could flip the bird to all of the manufactures.

Like it or not, right now AMA pro racing needs to make them happy.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
1/14/2011 7:43am
All this talk about the millions of dollars of R&D , tooling, blah blah blah.....just look at this for a moment. On one had you have one piston, one connecting rod, 245 lbs. of plastic, aluminum and steel raw materials for $8250.00. On the other hand you have two huge pistons, two rods, 613 lbs of plastic, aluminum and steel raw materials for $8290.00. There is a whole lot more tooling involved in that pig of a cruiser not to mention a crate full of extra parts, wiring, lamps, battery, guages, candy paint and clearcoat. Also, the 250F and 450F share a lot of components. Once they go FI and spin the cylinder around on the 250F, they'll share even more components. All the 2 stroke crowd would like to see from Yamaha is an upgrade to the bodywork and maybe a few minor upgrades elsewhere, such as possibly a direct bolt on 150cc kit for the 125.



MSRP* $8,250 (White/Red) Available from September 2010 $8,150 (Team Yamaha Blue/White) Available from September 2010 Engine Type 449cc liquid-cooled DOHC 4-stroke; 4 titanium valves Bore x Stroke 97.0 x 60.8mm Compression Ratio 12.5:1 Fuel Delivery Yamaha Fuel Injection (YFI), Keihin® 44mm Ignition CDI Transmission Constant-mesh 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch Final Drive Chain Drive Chassis Suspension / Front KYB® Speed-Sensitive System, inverted fork: fully adjustable, 12.2-in travel Suspension / Rear KYB® Fully adjustable single shock; 12.4-in travel Brakes / Front Hydraulic single disc brake, 250mm Brakes / Rear Hydraulic single disc brake, 245mm Tires / Front 80/100-21-Dunlop® D-742FA Tires / Rear 120/80-19-Dunlop® D-756 Dimensions Length 86.3 in Width 32.4 in Height 51.6 in Seat Height 39.3 in Wheelbase 58.7 in Ground Clearance 15.0 in Fuel Capacity 1.63 gal Wet Weight*** 245 lb Other Warranty 30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty)







MSRP* $8,390 (Raven) Available from September 2010/CA model February 2011
$8,290 (Deep Blue) Available from September 2010/CA model February 2011


Engine
Type 942cc air-cooled 4-stroke, V-twin, SOHC, 4-valve

Bore x Stroke 85.0mm x 83.0mm

Compression Ratio 9.0:1

Fuel Delivery Fuel injection

Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition

Transmission 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch

Final Drive Belt


Chassis
Suspension / Front Telescopic fork, 5.3-in travel

Suspension / Rear Single shock, 4.3-in travel

Brakes / Front Hydraulic disc, 320mm

Brakes / Rear Hydraulic disc, 298mm

Tires / Front 130/70-18M/C 63H

Tires / Rear 170/70-16 M/C 75H

Wheels 8-spoke cast


Dimensions
Length 95.9 in

Width 39.4 in

Height 42.5 in

Seat Height 26.5 in

Wheelbase 66.3 in

Rake (Caster Angle) 32.0°

Trail 5.7 in

Fuel Capacity 4.4 gal

Fuel Economy** 47 mpg

Wet Weight*** 613 lb


Other
Warranty 1 Year (Limited Factory Warranty)

wpark89
Posts
1157
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA US
1/14/2011 7:44am Edited Date/Time 1/14/2011 7:47am
Indy mxer wrote:
Yes, imo, it is better. No way would I go back to a 125 or a 250 2T.
I like riding a 250F much more.
The issue isn't wether or not YOU would go back to a 2 stroke. Guys like you....guys like me, people who have rode/raced for ages, the majority of us will continue no matter what.

The issue is that without the 2 stroke option newcomers won't become involved and others will vacate and that will have a tremendous negative effect on the sport down the road.



hellion
Posts
1086
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
1/14/2011 7:53am
burn1986 wrote:
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and...
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and out gunned, but there is still hope. How much more of a chance would he have if he had at least 25 or 50cc? Many people just say "Why doesn't he just race a 4-stroke?" The point is that he should at least have a choice.



Contrary to some on here I don't hate DC, I just think he's a little fearful of making any waves with anyone about 2-strokes. 2-strokes aren't the savior of SX or MX, its would just be nice to see the displacement raised a little, or have some inclusion at the Pro level.



DC and FTE have not answered the question - Are the current rules in the AMA ProRacing Rulebook fair for the 2-stroke?



hellion wrote:
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is...
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is doing. We just wish to make an impression on him that will help him make some positive changes.
rmgsxr wrote:
Did you guys read what DC wrote? It is not about what he believes to be fair on rules right now. If he changes the rules...
Did you guys read what DC wrote?

It is not about what he believes to be fair on rules right now. If he changes the rules and the manufactures don't like the rules and just stay home, where does that leave the sport right now? Kawasaki pays the Pro Circuit riders salaries so how do you think it would help if Kawasaki decided to stay home. There are not enough JGRs out there to fill the spots.

Don't know who follows Road Racing but it got pretty thin when DMG thought they could flip the bird to all of the manufactures.

Like it or not, right now AMA pro racing needs to make them happy.
Of course I've read what DC wrote. And Moto is not road racing. Road racing has never been nearly as popular in the US as moto, and it's not a family sport where kids do it in quantity. The manufacturers aren't going anywhere. If they do, good riddance. Companies like KTM will fill the void, companies that care about dirt bikes and dirt bike people. No one who wants our dollars is going anywhere. Thats ridiculous.
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13098
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
1/14/2011 7:59am Edited Date/Time 1/14/2011 9:39am
burn1986 wrote:
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and...
Hopefully Soubeyras has success and creates some excitement within the current AMA Rules. He has a huge uphill battle though. He is certainly out powered and out gunned, but there is still hope. How much more of a chance would he have if he had at least 25 or 50cc? Many people just say "Why doesn't he just race a 4-stroke?" The point is that he should at least have a choice.



Contrary to some on here I don't hate DC, I just think he's a little fearful of making any waves with anyone about 2-strokes. 2-strokes aren't the savior of SX or MX, its would just be nice to see the displacement raised a little, or have some inclusion at the Pro level.



DC and FTE have not answered the question - Are the current rules in the AMA ProRacing Rulebook fair for the 2-stroke?



If some guys only have access to a 250 smoker, then the answer is it's not fair. If a rider can have either, then it is fair because all riders have the same choice. The same goes for running a 250 smoker against a 250f in the amateurs. If everyone has the same choice of bikes available to them, then it's fair.

Is it a real choice given the difference between a 250 smoker and a 450? No. That's not really a fairness issue. Would a larger smoker make it a better choice, yes.

I think its unfair to say Davey is fearful of making waves. Maybe he's not being stupid. Maybe he's just making what he feels is the wisest choice he can at the moment given the recent precedent of the OEMs walking and the threat to do so here in MX. Keep in mind how in jeopardy the nationals were by the time the AMA decided it was screwing everything up would sell pro racing.

But if folks think winning the two stroke battle on principle is worth losing Pro MX, then - in fairness - you could at least credit the guy for simply disagreeing with you and doing what he thinks best rather than suggesting he doesn't have a spine or, worse, is a sell out.
gaines1016
Posts
98
Joined
6/8/2010
Location
Sioux City, IA US
1/14/2011 8:14am
hellion wrote:
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is...
I don't think anyone here hates DC. To the contrary, most of us have a respect and appreciation for him and the tough job he is doing. We just wish to make an impression on him that will help him make some positive changes.
gaines1016 wrote:
if thats the case you are doing it wrong
Kurt wrote:
Hopefully all are not as sensitive as you. The anti-establishment-to establishment comment from Hellion rings true. Most that sell out get flak, DC probably knows that...
Hopefully all are not as sensitive as you. The anti-establishment-to establishment comment from Hellion rings true. Most that sell out get flak, DC probably knows that.
A complete revamp should happen, then the common fan will enjoy things as they were when the last surge of off-road/mx happened. For those around then, you'll recall a recession was in full swing from the mid to late '70's, and didn't slow things down.
Consider the price for sx tickets the last few years, ads to excess in the mags, etc.
I'd love to see a little fat trimmed from the "sport".
This sport hardly needs growing, as depicted by the powers that be.
my comment has nothing to do with sensitivity. i would like to see a bit more respect shown for opposition during debates but that is neither here nor there.

the way to evoke the changes the 2stroke proponents desire is not by having 30 people spouting off on an internet thread. what you need is a single well spoken person to collect data from all and couple that with some research and organize those thoughts into document form presenting those ideals. this person also needs to be cognisant of the sticking points of the other side rather then dismissing them entirely.

way to many assumptions are regurgitated every time this debate shows up. one example from this thread. "husqvarna and tm would love to come into the sport if the current rule was ammended". really? in what capacity would they most likely come into the sport? sponsoring a single rider? having an entire team? maybe they really have no interest and are happy where they are. maybe they really would want to make a huge splash in this market if the rule changed. i dont know, but this is part of the research i spoke of. drawing conclusions from investigative research is much different from the assumptions thrown out as fact that happens every time this debate occurs.

putting together this type of proposal would be a ton of work and just because somebody put the effort into this document and presented it to the powers that be doesnt necessarily mean that the changes will happen. in that case you have to listen to their counter points and revise your own document accordingly and try again. its not the type of thing where the other side makes a counterpoint and you call them a shithead and go home. you actually have to listen and try to understand their point of view in order to come up with a fitting solution for all.

this is the real world and this is how things are done. the opportunity is more then available to you all. DC has posted his email right in this thread after all. but all of you blowing his inbox up separately with the same type of stuff that has been presented in this thread is not going to help your cause. thats my 2 cents anyway.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
1/14/2011 8:18am
I think DC has nothing but the best interest of the sport in mind. I also think the displacement rules are highly flawed. Raising cc limits to make things "fair" shouldn't concern the OEM's, they'll still race what they want. Raising cc limits still doesn't do anything to address the lack of a 125cc class which I feel to be an important issue and a much needed bike and class for kids coming off mini's. That class needs to make a comeback in a big way and a shortened national championship series would stir that interest.

So DC, how about that Racer X Rookie Cup 125cc 6 round National Championship? I'll sponsor some holeshot awards at each round and provide a bike for some deserving rider.
seth505
Posts
10172
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
1/14/2011 8:25am
Equal displacement would be rad but it also doesn't fix the issue of mini kids transitioning to big bikes. Going from an 80 to a 250f sucks as would going from a 80 to a 250. Bottom line is no one needs a friggin 450, 250 2strokes make plenty of power and the displacement should have never climbed that high. People could race competitively and clear big jumps on 125s and 250s...
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
1/14/2011 8:33am
I just came across this and I have to admit I didn't read 11 pages of stuff, but I did read the central premise on the first page that four strokes ruined racing. I love two strokes and have never bought a four stroke MX bike, but I don't think that's true. They didn't ruin anything - but we definitely need two strokes in the field. Just let them run leaded gas at the Nationals, and you'd have some privateers campaigning them in the 450 class (probably not on 125s in the 250 class). And lots of local races have two stroke classes, so that's good, along with the amateur nationals.

I used to get a lot more upset about this kind of thing, but it is what it is. I remember when Yamaha and Honda came into MX and started to displace Husky, Maico, CZ and etc - lots of us thought it was the end of the sport as we knew it. They had so much money but never had the soul of the sport like the old Euro marques did. Come to find out, the Japanese brands didn't ruin anything.

I really think there's a middle ground. Let guys run unleaded in 250s and you'll see them doing OK in the 450 class, at least privateers, the spectators will cheer for them extra hard and it'll add a whole new dimension to the experience. Surely there's a better way than constantly retreating to our trenches and fighting the same battle every year.
gaines1016
Posts
98
Joined
6/8/2010
Location
Sioux City, IA US
1/14/2011 8:33am
newmann wrote:
I think DC has nothing but the best interest of the sport in mind. I also think the displacement rules are highly flawed. Raising cc limits...
I think DC has nothing but the best interest of the sport in mind. I also think the displacement rules are highly flawed. Raising cc limits to make things "fair" shouldn't concern the OEM's, they'll still race what they want. Raising cc limits still doesn't do anything to address the lack of a 125cc class which I feel to be an important issue and a much needed bike and class for kids coming off mini's. That class needs to make a comeback in a big way and a shortened national championship series would stir that interest.

So DC, how about that Racer X Rookie Cup 125cc 6 round National Championship? I'll sponsor some holeshot awards at each round and provide a bike for some deserving rider.
in the current state of affairs i believe this idea has the most legs
hellion
Posts
1086
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
1/14/2011 8:43am
gaines1016 wrote:
if thats the case you are doing it wrong
Kurt wrote:
Hopefully all are not as sensitive as you. The anti-establishment-to establishment comment from Hellion rings true. Most that sell out get flak, DC probably knows that...
Hopefully all are not as sensitive as you. The anti-establishment-to establishment comment from Hellion rings true. Most that sell out get flak, DC probably knows that.
A complete revamp should happen, then the common fan will enjoy things as they were when the last surge of off-road/mx happened. For those around then, you'll recall a recession was in full swing from the mid to late '70's, and didn't slow things down.
Consider the price for sx tickets the last few years, ads to excess in the mags, etc.
I'd love to see a little fat trimmed from the "sport".
This sport hardly needs growing, as depicted by the powers that be.
gaines1016 wrote:
my comment has nothing to do with sensitivity. i would like to see a bit more respect shown for opposition during debates but that is neither...
my comment has nothing to do with sensitivity. i would like to see a bit more respect shown for opposition during debates but that is neither here nor there.

the way to evoke the changes the 2stroke proponents desire is not by having 30 people spouting off on an internet thread. what you need is a single well spoken person to collect data from all and couple that with some research and organize those thoughts into document form presenting those ideals. this person also needs to be cognisant of the sticking points of the other side rather then dismissing them entirely.

way to many assumptions are regurgitated every time this debate shows up. one example from this thread. "husqvarna and tm would love to come into the sport if the current rule was ammended". really? in what capacity would they most likely come into the sport? sponsoring a single rider? having an entire team? maybe they really have no interest and are happy where they are. maybe they really would want to make a huge splash in this market if the rule changed. i dont know, but this is part of the research i spoke of. drawing conclusions from investigative research is much different from the assumptions thrown out as fact that happens every time this debate occurs.

putting together this type of proposal would be a ton of work and just because somebody put the effort into this document and presented it to the powers that be doesnt necessarily mean that the changes will happen. in that case you have to listen to their counter points and revise your own document accordingly and try again. its not the type of thing where the other side makes a counterpoint and you call them a shithead and go home. you actually have to listen and try to understand their point of view in order to come up with a fitting solution for all.

this is the real world and this is how things are done. the opportunity is more then available to you all. DC has posted his email right in this thread after all. but all of you blowing his inbox up separately with the same type of stuff that has been presented in this thread is not going to help your cause. thats my 2 cents anyway.
That is a very well thought out response. The big BUT comes here though. Exactly who do you think will hear our proposal? It's the people in charge of this that have the money and make the decisions and DC now has a big responsibility to listen to their desires. Our proposal will be either not heard or laughed out of the board room.
A simple thing like allowing 250 two strokes into the nationals could start the land slide for a big change that would make things better for us all. I don't think a 250 two stroke is a huge unfair advantage against a PC or Gieco 250f. I do think that a privateer will do well enough that everyone will need to look at what we are doing and why.
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
1/14/2011 8:53am
I just came across this and I have to admit I didn't read 11 pages of stuff, but I did read the central premise on the first page that four strokes ruined racing. I love two strokes and have never bought a four stroke MX bike, but I don't think that's true. They didn't ruin anything - but we definitely need two strokes in the field. Just let them run leaded gas at the Nationals, and you'd have some privateers campaigning them in the 450 class (probably not on 125s in the 250 class). And lots of local races have two stroke classes, so that's good, along with the amateur nationals.

I used to get a lot more upset about this kind of thing, but it is what it is. I remember when Yamaha and Honda came into MX and started to displace Husky, Maico, CZ and etc - lots of us thought it was the end of the sport as we knew it. They had so much money but never had the soul of the sport like the old Euro marques did. Come to find out, the Japanese brands didn't ruin anything.

I really think there's a middle ground. Let guys run unleaded in 250s and you'll see them doing OK in the 450 class, at least privateers, the spectators will cheer for them extra hard and it'll add a whole new dimension to the experience. Surely there's a better way than constantly retreating to our trenches and fighting the same battle every year.
Bill163
Posts
261
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
1/14/2011 8:57am
newmann wrote:
I think DC has nothing but the best interest of the sport in mind. I also think the displacement rules are highly flawed. Raising cc limits...
I think DC has nothing but the best interest of the sport in mind. I also think the displacement rules are highly flawed. Raising cc limits to make things "fair" shouldn't concern the OEM's, they'll still race what they want. Raising cc limits still doesn't do anything to address the lack of a 125cc class which I feel to be an important issue and a much needed bike and class for kids coming off mini's. That class needs to make a comeback in a big way and a shortened national championship series would stir that interest.

So DC, how about that Racer X Rookie Cup 125cc 6 round National Championship? I'll sponsor some holeshot awards at each round and provide a bike for some deserving rider.
I am with Newmann that if such a series were formed I would provide a bike and some additional support.
FlaNard
Posts
3620
Joined
10/13/2009
Location
Layton, UT US
1/14/2011 9:02am Edited Date/Time 1/14/2011 1:22pm
More two strokes at the track every week. Fewer riders at the track every week. More tracks closing. A pro system set up to where if you are on a 250f and not riding for a major team you have NO shot. Thus far, the only response I have heard is "Well, we cant do anything. Honda may take their ball and go home." So this is 100% controlled by what Honda wants. Good to know that they have the sport and its future as their primary interest. And to the people who claim that Nascar is doing fine as a spectator sport and that tv trumps sales, maybe you should go take a look at how badly Nascar is doing right now. They even did a Daily Show on it last night. Its going down hill fast. So is Motocross. If you kill the riders, you kill the sport. Do you think my future kids will give a shit about watching rich kids ride around doing something they can never afford to do? I doubt it. Meanwhile Mitch and FC will continue to dominate and get a pat on the back for beating overmatched kids who barely break even if lucky. But you say leave it alone or Honda will take its ball and go home. What a group of forward thinking leaders we have. That must be why all the tracks are closing. We have no leaders.
wpark89
Posts
1157
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA US
1/14/2011 9:03am
gaines1016 wrote:
in the current state of affairs i believe this idea has the most legs
You're right.

I think we all agree that since minis are staying 2 strokes we need a 125 class. It's a necessary bike. It's more likely to get going than getting 250's in the 250 class.

Look at the model in Europe...they have a good series for kids to aspire to race 125's in. So they will buy them and ride them locally as well. The manufactures have obviously taken notice, because you can go buy a RM 125 in Italy for 1800 Euro ($2400) less than an RMZ 250. In England a new RM 125 is 2000 pounds (about $3000) less than a new RMZ 250. They have the option to decide how they race.

We will too. I think more and more promoters are adding 125 classes and it can grow. Manufactures will have to bring back their 125's to the US. We need to develop a small series. 6 races may be too much to start with. But we need to come up with some sort of model and plan to build it.
hellion
Posts
1086
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
1/14/2011 10:19am
gaines1016 wrote:
in the current state of affairs i believe this idea has the most legs
wpark89 wrote:
You're right. I think we all agree that since minis are staying 2 strokes we need a 125 class. It's a necessary bike. It's more likely...
You're right.

I think we all agree that since minis are staying 2 strokes we need a 125 class. It's a necessary bike. It's more likely to get going than getting 250's in the 250 class.

Look at the model in Europe...they have a good series for kids to aspire to race 125's in. So they will buy them and ride them locally as well. The manufactures have obviously taken notice, because you can go buy a RM 125 in Italy for 1800 Euro ($2400) less than an RMZ 250. In England a new RM 125 is 2000 pounds (about $3000) less than a new RMZ 250. They have the option to decide how they race.

We will too. I think more and more promoters are adding 125 classes and it can grow. Manufactures will have to bring back their 125's to the US. We need to develop a small series. 6 races may be too much to start with. But we need to come up with some sort of model and plan to build it.
I would love nothing more than to hear a line of 125's leave the gate. Even more so if it was at the national level. But if we have to grow it from the bottom then thats what we should do.

Post a reply to: Jody, MXA, Two Strokes and Matthes

The Latest