Gross Negligence by FELD / AMA

1/11/2026 8:10am
It is certainly headed that way as long as these boneheaded, knuckle-dragging attitudes persist.You don’t seem to be able to draw the distinction between the responsibility...

It is certainly headed that way as long as these boneheaded, knuckle-dragging attitudes persist.

You don’t seem to be able to draw the distinction between the responsibility of an individual rider over the responsibility of an organization that is putting on an event.

In motocross, riders legally accept the risk of crashes caused by other competitors, even fatal ones, as long as those actions fall within normal racing conduct. Track operators and organizers are different because they control the environment and safety systems, which creates a legal duty to prevent foreseeable, non-inherent hazards.

Riders assume risk; organizers assume responsibility.

What happened with Barcia was a grossly unprepared medical team that created an optics nightmare. Having an unconscious participant lying there unattended to for almost a minute is mind-boggling and embarrassing.

The Zingg lawsuit contests that, with proper flagger position, Aidan’s death was avoidable. It in no way contests that his crash was avoidable. That crash was on Aidan.

Getting plowed into by other riders who had no idea that you were down is a different set of circumstances entirely. The lawsuit plainly states that this set of circumstances could have been avoided.

Had Barcia bled out, or failed to regain a proper airway during that period of time, you can bet you would see some lawsuits drop.
 

Suing will never fix anything. Other than the attorneys retirement fund. 🤷‍♂️

3
Shred
Posts
1506
Joined
10/21/2021
Location
Brighton, CO US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 8:14am

Astars medic just plain didn’t see Barcia down when he went to Mookie.  What baffles me is the dumbass track worker that can’t pick up a bike being more worried about picking up bikes when he SEES a rider that is a rag doll and isn’t waiving over a medic.  Fuck the bike…and the race…a rider could be dying.

11
2
1/11/2026 8:16am Edited Date/Time 1/11/2026 8:19am

Suing will never fix anything. Other than the attorneys retirement fund. 🤷‍♂️

If lawsuits didn’t work, why do companies spend billions trying to avoid them?

If liability had no effect:
There would be no compliance departments
No safety officers
No risk management teams
No insurance underwriting standards
No internal incident reporting systems

Those exist because litigation risk works.

Lawsuits are not perfect, but they are the most effective mechanism society has for forcing powerful actors to internalize the consequences of preventable harm. 

3
8
1/11/2026 8:19am
C.Worthy wrote:

Being there in a few seconds I can guarantee you it’s not on their mind. Reasonable response time given the circumstances 

If that is the case, then they need to retake a course on what the ef the E stands for in EMT.  I don't for one second question the quality of care given to Justin Barcia. I'm confident it was excellent care and i don't question that. But the response time to get to him and start giving care was unacceptable and inexcusable in those circumstances.  Period.  

2
4

The Shop

1/11/2026 8:28am
If lawsuits didn’t work, why do companies spend billions trying to avoid them?If liability had no effect:There would be no compliance departmentsNo safety officersNo risk management...

If lawsuits didn’t work, why do companies spend billions trying to avoid them?

If liability had no effect:
There would be no compliance departments
No safety officers
No risk management teams
No insurance underwriting standards
No internal incident reporting systems

Those exist because litigation risk works.

Lawsuits are not perfect, but they are the most effective mechanism society has for forcing powerful actors to internalize the consequences of preventable harm. 

Yes, lawsuits work for companies that have billions and billions more to continue to make.  Try mom and pop tracks (the very essence of our sport) that maybe have thousands(not billions) who are being  affected by this sue happy mentality. 
Fine, sue the shit out of Feld. They’ll eventually have their accountants run the numbers and realize that they can add 15 more monster truck shows in place of motorcycles and cancel stupidcross all together because it doesn’t pencil anymore. I get the outrage but if any of you truly cared about real safety you wouldn’t be doing this shit. It’s dangerous and the ultimate gross negligence is in fact signing up to participate. Everything is now someone else’s fault and they should pay…. And they’ll be right and our sport will die or become too expensive for anyone to enjoy.  
 

2
4
truck
Posts
3483
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 8:32am

Suing will never fix anything. Other than the attorneys retirement fund. 🤷‍♂️

If lawsuits didn’t work, why do companies spend billions trying to avoid them?If liability had no effect:There would be no compliance departmentsNo safety officersNo risk management...

If lawsuits didn’t work, why do companies spend billions trying to avoid them?

If liability had no effect:
There would be no compliance departments
No safety officers
No risk management teams
No insurance underwriting standards
No internal incident reporting systems

Those exist because litigation risk works.

Lawsuits are not perfect, but they are the most effective mechanism society has for forcing powerful actors to internalize the consequences of preventable harm. 

This is nonsense, as anyone who has worked in fields burdened by these bureaucratic circle jerks can tell you. Bunch of people having meetings and writing protocols and making changes for the sake of justifying their existence when all it dose is get in the way of and complicate actual improvement. Too many people making a living pushing papers and everyone knows to just play along out of fear that if anyone speaks up about how retarded it all is that their job might be the first to go. Lobby the politicians to write it into law and put it on cruise control from there.

5
Spooner
Posts
2425
Joined
1/8/2011
Location
Kansas City, MO US
1/11/2026 8:34am
kbsci wrote:
This is an airbag, right? That’s exactly where his body hit the ground. I don’t know how it’s triggered but that thing could be what saved...

This is an airbag, right? That’s exactly where his body hit the ground. I don’t know how it’s triggered but that thing could be what saved his life. Also, the Nicky Hayden butt patch. Justin is a rockstar.

IMG 1262 3IMG 1261 2.jpeg?VersionId=VaH93.Z.QXiX0BGJhJBa2

Yes this is the airbag-I'm so glad he was running it.  I wonder if we will get more high profile guys deciding to run it after that. 

2
1/11/2026 8:35am
Anyone of you been into ground level and seen how hard it is to see across the lanes?The noise of the bikes the crowd etc.I’m guessing...

Anyone of you been into ground level and seen how hard it is to see across the lanes?

The noise of the bikes the crowd etc.

I’m guessing the medic attending mookie couldn’t see Justin on the ground as there were bikes and riders in the way.

Wouldn't have made a difference even if the medic attending Mookie knew Barcia was there. In EMS, once you make patient contact, you do not leave your patient until they refuse care or you transfer them to a higher level of care. If you do you can and will be sued if the initial patient has a poor outcome, and you could be subject to criminal charges of negligence. 

3
disbanded
Posts
6858
Joined
8/26/2007
Location
Evergreen, CO US
1/11/2026 8:36am

Suing will never fix anything. Other than the attorneys retirement fund. 🤷‍♂️

If lawsuits didn’t work, why do companies spend billions trying to avoid them?If liability had no effect:There would be no compliance departmentsNo safety officersNo risk management...

If lawsuits didn’t work, why do companies spend billions trying to avoid them?

If liability had no effect:
There would be no compliance departments
No safety officers
No risk management teams
No insurance underwriting standards
No internal incident reporting systems

Those exist because litigation risk works.

Lawsuits are not perfect, but they are the most effective mechanism society has for forcing powerful actors to internalize the consequences of preventable harm. 

You are fucked

1
truck
Posts
3483
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 8:38am

And beyond that, if you think lawsuits drive companies to improve instead of just driving them to avoid them or get away with things when they do come, I've got some great stories to tell you from some risk management meetings. 

I was once told by a risk management person that I was putting too many patients on cardiac monitoring and it was increasing hospital liability because it was leaving documentation of things. Hospital would be better off if more patients were just found dead the next time nurses came around to take vitals with no telemetry to document what happened and leave them open to criticism. That's the kind of shit lawsuits and losers in cubicles who worry about them come up with. That's how lawsuits "work" by your theory of them. 

9
1
1/11/2026 8:40am

It seems like nothing major is going to change with safety in this sport until a factory rider dies on the track. I still have flashbacks to Alessi's lifeless body lying on the track at Red Bud getting landed on and ran over multiple times. 

Obviously this Barcia situation was unavoidable, but the response was completely pathetic. 

4
3
1/11/2026 8:44am
truck wrote:
Me me me pick me i know this one!!!!If he's got a broken neck or back you can limit damage to cord and nerves by bringing...

Me me me pick me i know this one!!!!

If he's got a broken neck or back you can limit damage to cord and nerves by bringing the spine back into alignment and relieving pressure. 

Also, If he's out cold with chin tucked like that it's not a bad idea to open their airway a little so they don't get all hypoxic and lose a pulse or make any brain injury worse. 

Just checking a pulse is also not a bad idea..... 

I sincerely hope this post is sarcasm. You never move a patient with that mechanism of injury until the spine and particularly the C-spine has been assessed, unless the airway is not patent or they are bleeding out. You can kill the patient that way or do further damage....

1
1/11/2026 8:44am Edited Date/Time 1/11/2026 8:45am

I should know better by now than to meander into non-motocross related topics. The law will continue to do its thing, regardless of your attitude and perception of its role in society.

I am extremely grateful that Justin Barcia appears to be OK. That was certainly not a demonstration of negligence. Just a demonstration of unpreparedness. The whole sequence of events was just a complete lack of coordination and protocol. Even the person trying to lift Barcia’s bike, for example. That person should never touch another downed motorcycle again until they’ve spent an entire week practicing whatever the fuck it was they were trying to do, at a moment when it was completely unnecessary.

To see an unconscious rider lying there for almost a minute was truly painful to watch, That was one of the scariest things I’ve witnessed in this sport, and the lack of immediate attention on  Barcia just made it worse

6
3
1/11/2026 8:45am

FWIW, Burkeen posted a video last night saying that "word from the pits" is that arms/legs are moving, but big concern for his head. Didn't comment to broken bones.

1
1/11/2026 8:46am
truck wrote:

You can definitely leave a patient to go triage another. This is basic stuff.

Not in prehospital care, unless you have a dedicated triage team and dedicated care providers. 

6
TK40_FC
Posts
611
Joined
5/17/2021
Location
Canton, OH US
1/11/2026 8:46am

That Justin (seems to be) okay, is ultimately what will give the medic unit an opportunity to use this whole ordeal as something to learn from and I am still optimistic enough to think that changes in protocols will be implemented immediately. You need the ability to provide care to more than 1 person at mutiple locations around the track, and medical response is worth investing in. If they need more medical responders, this should be the catalyst for that argument. 

4
1
truck
Posts
3483
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 8:48am
truck wrote:
Me me me pick me i know this one!!!!If he's got a broken neck or back you can limit damage to cord and nerves by bringing...

Me me me pick me i know this one!!!!

If he's got a broken neck or back you can limit damage to cord and nerves by bringing the spine back into alignment and relieving pressure. 

Also, If he's out cold with chin tucked like that it's not a bad idea to open their airway a little so they don't get all hypoxic and lose a pulse or make any brain injury worse. 

Just checking a pulse is also not a bad idea..... 

I sincerely hope this post is sarcasm. You never move a patient with that mechanism of injury until the spine and particularly the C-spine has been...

I sincerely hope this post is sarcasm. You never move a patient with that mechanism of injury until the spine and particularly the C-spine has been assessed, unless the airway is not patent or they are bleeding out. You can kill the patient that way or do further damage....

YOU never move a patient in that scenario, but professionals who know what they're doing do. Bringing someone gently back to midline is part of the process and airway takes precedent over C spine. Guarantee you the medical crew did exactly that soon after finally getting to him. They didn't board him in fetal position. 

3
truck
Posts
3483
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 8:49am
truck wrote:

You can definitely leave a patient to go triage another. This is basic stuff.

Not in prehospital care, unless you have a dedicated triage team and dedicated care providers. 

lol please..... you're the first crew to pull up to two vehicle mvc and you stop at the first car you get to and never go look at the other?  Please tell me you don't do any of this for a living. 

8
1/11/2026 8:54am Edited Date/Time 1/11/2026 8:56am
truck wrote:
YOU never move a patient in that scenario, but professionals who know what they're doing do. Bringing someone gently back to midline is part of the...

YOU never move a patient in that scenario, but professionals who know what they're doing do. Bringing someone gently back to midline is part of the process and airway takes precedent over C spine. Guarantee you the medical crew did exactly that soon after finally getting to him. They didn't board him in fetal position. 

I'm aware of how it's done, particularly in the prehospital setting, as I served as an EMT for 10 years, and did my fair share of it. And to answer your other comments, we never ran 1 person ambulances, and at a MVC we also would have a rescue truck and additional medic units dispatched as needed

 

1
6
APLMAN99
Posts
12155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 8:58am

Not being at the event myself, I don’t know and haven’t seen any real mention about where the med crew actually was at the time of the accident. It seems like a lot of the criticism ignores that we have the luxury of hindsight, which the initial responders obviously didn’t have  

If they were or on the far side of the track or didn’t have a clear path to the crash location, that matters. They don’t just appear next to a downed rider. And if they’d gone to Barcia first, people would be mad that they waited to help Stewart. There’s probably no version of this where everyone is instantly attended to with the best qualified people on hand.  If the track workers who were close weren’t trained medical professionals, they may have made the injuries worse, not helped  

Add in that they can’t cross a hot track at will without endangering themselves and the 22 other racers, and the timeline may make a lot more sense.  Not ideal, but perhaps a little more understandable.

It’s easy to critique after the fact from the couch or even/especially the stands. It’s a little different in real time when you’re trying to triage and not create a second emergency.

4
5
maxer
Posts
240
Joined
12/9/2020
Location
Grapevine, TX US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 8:58am
maxer wrote:
The medic response time getting to Barcia was an absolute joke. Not the mention the fat track worker not having the slightest clue how to pick...

The medic response time getting to Barcia was an absolute joke. Not the mention the fat track worker not having the slightest clue how to pick up a bike. Clown show by FELD and the AMA. 

 

video is disturbing, warning

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTWpn3djGG6/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link…

Nice title to your thread there guy. Did you attend the 1-800 injury hotline university of law?  I’m sure all the track owners on here would...

Nice title to your thread there guy. Did you attend the 1-800 injury hotline university of law?  I’m sure all the track owners on here would like to know your real name so they can be sure you never set foot on their property for fear of being accused of “gROsS nEgLiGeNcE” and being sued into oblivion because of their so called gRoSs nEgLiGeNcE. 
The very essence of motocross is gross negligence. You are literally choosing to cheat death and risk dismemberment for a dopamine rush. 

I’m not defending the situation last night by any means. But the gross negligence pitchfork mob is out in full force here and turning on the very sport they  supposedly love. Everyone wants safety and justice. These words used in the same context of gross negligence usually mean they want $$$$ 

Be careful what you wish for. The government is noticing and they will get involved and deliver this justice and safety everyone so desperately seeks. I already see no kids racing under 18 years of age quickly arriving and safety restrictions that are going to be so burdensome they will truly save us from our sport completely by eliminating any grassroots options. 

The basic fact is that Motocross is a gladiator sport. You do it, you’re getting hurt and hurt bad and you might die too.  Just like the gladiators. The only difference other than the lions and tigers and bears is that we choose to participate, the Roman emperor isn’t forcing anyone to jump on their dirtbike and go to battle. Your very first decision when you choose to participate in this sport is accepting the fact that you will endure bodily harm at some point as a result. You are choosing self imposed gross negligence. The irony I find in all these gross negligence justice seekers is that when something bad happens they turn into defenders of safety all of a sudden. They want to make the sport safer. If you cared about safety you wouldn’t  be hanging on to a motorized death trap and flying it off 70’ jumps with 19 other guys next to you in the air. In fact, if you really cared about safety you’d be helping the USA Today editors gather more stories about injured and dead kids across the country so you help make it safer aka illegal and extinct because that’s where this shit is all headed. Attacking Feld and the AMA isn’t going to help our cause. 

 

 

I'm not coming after the sport dumbfuck I'm calling out the billion dollar promoters for having routine examples of giving piss poor medical attention to riders.

1
7
1/11/2026 9:12am

Wild how fast people demand accountability when it’s their rider and their race. A slow medical response sparks instant outrage, but long-term chaos, zero safeguards, and strongman politics somehow get a pass. Principles shouldn’t be situational.

1
Hammer 663s
Posts
3069
Joined
6/2/2016
Location
Forest Grove, OR US
1/11/2026 9:12am Edited Date/Time 1/11/2026 9:13am
APLMAN99 wrote:
Not being at the event myself, I don’t know and haven’t seen any real mention about where the med crew actually was at the time of...

Not being at the event myself, I don’t know and haven’t seen any real mention about where the med crew actually was at the time of the accident. It seems like a lot of the criticism ignores that we have the luxury of hindsight, which the initial responders obviously didn’t have  

If they were or on the far side of the track or didn’t have a clear path to the crash location, that matters. They don’t just appear next to a downed rider. And if they’d gone to Barcia first, people would be mad that they waited to help Stewart. There’s probably no version of this where everyone is instantly attended to with the best qualified people on hand.  If the track workers who were close weren’t trained medical professionals, they may have made the injuries worse, not helped  

Add in that they can’t cross a hot track at will without endangering themselves and the 22 other racers, and the timeline may make a lot more sense.  Not ideal, but perhaps a little more understandable.

It’s easy to critique after the fact from the couch or even/especially the stands. It’s a little different in real time when you’re trying to triage and not create a second emergency.

Well that would be piss poor planning then, wouldn’t it? Where should the med crew be on the first lap of any main? In the first 3-4 corners, where the intensity and aggression are highest, riders are bunched up on a narrow track, and everyone is sending it battling for early position. All we hear is how important the start is and how well Kenny dices through the pack in the first lap. But the AStars crew can’t figure out where to put their team(s)?  Again, fucking disgraceful preparation and execution.  

9
2
1/11/2026 9:15am

Question for the group; Brian Moreau...if I recall, his accident sparked similar outrage, I believe there were some that implied the SCI could have been avoided. How have things improved from that witch hunt?

3
DonM
Posts
8284
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 9:27am
Question for the group; Brian Moreau...if I recall, his accident sparked similar outrage, I believe there were some that implied the SCI could have been avoided...

Question for the group; Brian Moreau...if I recall, his accident sparked similar outrage, I believe there were some that implied the SCI could have been avoided. How have things improved from that witch hunt?

For one they didn't drag Barcia off the track...so there's one improvement......*Sarcasm Alert*

6
1
vet323
Posts
3554
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD US
1/11/2026 9:35am
truck wrote:

You can definitely leave a patient to go triage another. This is basic stuff.

Not in prehospital care, unless you have a dedicated triage team and dedicated care providers. 

truck wrote:
lol please..... you're the first crew to pull up to two vehicle mvc and you stop at the first car you get to and never go...

lol please..... you're the first crew to pull up to two vehicle mvc and you stop at the first car you get to and never go look at the other?  Please tell me you don't do any of this for a living. 

I get what you're saying, would you say it sometimes takes as long as 50 or 60 seconds to assess an injury before you move on? Is that a reasonable amount of time?

1
vet323
Posts
3554
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD US
1/11/2026 9:38am
It is certainly headed that way as long as these boneheaded, knuckle-dragging attitudes persist.You don’t seem to be able to draw the distinction between the responsibility...

It is certainly headed that way as long as these boneheaded, knuckle-dragging attitudes persist.

You don’t seem to be able to draw the distinction between the responsibility of an individual rider over the responsibility of an organization that is putting on an event.

In motocross, riders legally accept the risk of crashes caused by other competitors, even fatal ones, as long as those actions fall within normal racing conduct. Track operators and organizers are different because they control the environment and safety systems, which creates a legal duty to prevent foreseeable, non-inherent hazards.

Riders assume risk; organizers assume responsibility.

What happened with Barcia was a grossly unprepared medical team that created an optics nightmare. Having an unconscious participant lying there unattended to for almost a minute is mind-boggling and embarrassing.

The Zingg lawsuit contests that, with proper flagger position, Aidan’s death was avoidable. It in no way contests that his crash was avoidable. That crash was on Aidan.

Getting plowed into by other riders who had no idea that you were down is a different set of circumstances entirely. The lawsuit plainly states that this set of circumstances could have been avoided.

Had Barcia bled out, or failed to regain a proper airway during that period of time, you can bet you would see some lawsuits drop.
 

This dumbass again...

"The Zingg lawsuit clearly states..."

No, dummy. Lawsuits don't "state" anything, they make "claims." You would be much less annoying if you understood that.

truck
Posts
3483
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY US
Fantasy
1/11/2026 9:55am

Not in prehospital care, unless you have a dedicated triage team and dedicated care providers. 

truck wrote:
lol please..... you're the first crew to pull up to two vehicle mvc and you stop at the first car you get to and never go...

lol please..... you're the first crew to pull up to two vehicle mvc and you stop at the first car you get to and never go look at the other?  Please tell me you don't do any of this for a living. 

vet323 wrote:
I get what you're saying, would you say it sometimes takes as long as 50 or 60 seconds to assess an injury before you move on...

I get what you're saying, would you say it sometimes takes as long as 50 or 60 seconds to assess an injury before you move on? Is that a reasonable amount of time?

Depends. If someone is awake and able to respond to a question or two, you've learned they're perfusing their brain and have at least somewhat of an airway, so you can move to next patient in a few seconds. Even if they're out it doesn't take that long to check a pulse and open airway. Can pretty quickly bounce between a few patients and determine who needs you now and who can wait. 

The guy tending to mookie just didn't see barcia behind the bikes or I'm pretty sure he would have peeled off and went to him. 

3
vet323
Posts
3554
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD US
1/11/2026 10:00am
truck wrote:
lol please..... you're the first crew to pull up to two vehicle mvc and you stop at the first car you get to and never go...

lol please..... you're the first crew to pull up to two vehicle mvc and you stop at the first car you get to and never go look at the other?  Please tell me you don't do any of this for a living. 

vet323 wrote:
I get what you're saying, would you say it sometimes takes as long as 50 or 60 seconds to assess an injury before you move on...

I get what you're saying, would you say it sometimes takes as long as 50 or 60 seconds to assess an injury before you move on? Is that a reasonable amount of time?

truck wrote:
Depends. If someone is awake and able to respond to a question or two, you've learned they're perfusing their brain and have at least somewhat of...

Depends. If someone is awake and able to respond to a question or two, you've learned they're perfusing their brain and have at least somewhat of an airway, so you can move to next patient in a few seconds. Even if they're out it doesn't take that long to check a pulse and open airway. Can pretty quickly bounce between a few patients and determine who needs you now and who can wait. 

The guy tending to mookie just didn't see barcia behind the bikes or I'm pretty sure he would have peeled off and went to him. 

Maybe he would have, but someone else was attending to Bam-Bam within 30 seconds of him getting to Mookie anyway.

1
2
jg791
Posts
24
Joined
4/11/2023
Location
Lexington, KY US
1/11/2026 10:14am
Nice title to your thread there guy. Did you attend the 1-800 injury hotline university of law?  I’m sure all the track owners on here would...

Nice title to your thread there guy. Did you attend the 1-800 injury hotline university of law?  I’m sure all the track owners on here would like to know your real name so they can be sure you never set foot on their property for fear of being accused of “gROsS nEgLiGeNcE” and being sued into oblivion because of their so called gRoSs nEgLiGeNcE. 
The very essence of motocross is gross negligence. You are literally choosing to cheat death and risk dismemberment for a dopamine rush. 

I’m not defending the situation last night by any means. But the gross negligence pitchfork mob is out in full force here and turning on the very sport they  supposedly love. Everyone wants safety and justice. These words used in the same context of gross negligence usually mean they want $$$$ 

Be careful what you wish for. The government is noticing and they will get involved and deliver this justice and safety everyone so desperately seeks. I already see no kids racing under 18 years of age quickly arriving and safety restrictions that are going to be so burdensome they will truly save us from our sport completely by eliminating any grassroots options. 

The basic fact is that Motocross is a gladiator sport. You do it, you’re getting hurt and hurt bad and you might die too.  Just like the gladiators. The only difference other than the lions and tigers and bears is that we choose to participate, the Roman emperor isn’t forcing anyone to jump on their dirtbike and go to battle. Your very first decision when you choose to participate in this sport is accepting the fact that you will endure bodily harm at some point as a result. You are choosing self imposed gross negligence. The irony I find in all these gross negligence justice seekers is that when something bad happens they turn into defenders of safety all of a sudden. They want to make the sport safer. If you cared about safety you wouldn’t  be hanging on to a motorized death trap and flying it off 70’ jumps with 19 other guys next to you in the air. In fact, if you really cared about safety you’d be helping the USA Today editors gather more stories about injured and dead kids across the country so you help make it safer aka illegal and extinct because that’s where this shit is all headed. Attacking Feld and the AMA isn’t going to help our cause. 

 

 

It is certainly headed that way as long as these boneheaded, knuckle-dragging attitudes persist.You don’t seem to be able to draw the distinction between the responsibility...

It is certainly headed that way as long as these boneheaded, knuckle-dragging attitudes persist.

You don’t seem to be able to draw the distinction between the responsibility of an individual rider over the responsibility of an organization that is putting on an event.

In motocross, riders legally accept the risk of crashes caused by other competitors, even fatal ones, as long as those actions fall within normal racing conduct. Track operators and organizers are different because they control the environment and safety systems, which creates a legal duty to prevent foreseeable, non-inherent hazards.

Riders assume risk; organizers assume responsibility.

What happened with Barcia was a grossly unprepared medical team that created an optics nightmare. Having an unconscious participant lying there unattended to for almost a minute is mind-boggling and embarrassing.

The Zingg lawsuit contests that, with proper flagger position, Aidan’s death was avoidable. It in no way contests that his crash was avoidable. That crash was on Aidan.

Getting plowed into by other riders who had no idea that you were down is a different set of circumstances entirely. The lawsuit plainly states that this set of circumstances could have been avoided.

Had Barcia bled out, or failed to regain a proper airway during that period of time, you can bet you would see some lawsuits drop.
 

Yep.

I have personally sat in the crowd at an AMA-sanctioned amateur event and watched a child go down in a whoops section, followed by a failure to flag because the flagger was on his phone. If a child had been hit in that scenario, is that an "acceptable risk" because they're "gladiators"? Why have flaggers and medics at all if they don't do their job the best they can? Is the military wrong if they train extensively to avoid causalities and mitigate injuries because "it's war bro"? Should pilots "YOLO that shit" because flying is dangerous?

F1, MotoGP, MotoAmerica, WSBK, NASCAR, IndyCar and others have all improved protocols over time due to tragedy. For some reason, in motocross, this triggers a bunch of people on the Internet. I feel horrible if the Zingg (RIP) family is having to read through the opinions of random Squidbillies moaning about their lawsuit.

The irony is, these same people are crying about the death of local tracks. Every person I've talked in real life who gives up motocross/GNCC/whatever leaves because of: injuries, or risk of injury. 99% of people who ride work a job on Monday and can't afford to have a $400,000 medical bill or be paralyzed for life. But, ya know, better medics and flaggers aren't fuckin' core bro. The bikes are faster, the tracks are harder and the riders are more competitive (how many of these kids train at a camp?) than ever before. "Gladiator rules" on top of that is not gonna attract more people, it's going to mean people ride a few times, quietly sell the bike on FB Marketplace and end up buying another stupid SxS in a sport that is already shrinking due to not being affordable for the average person.

I've ridden with a motorcycle org that was terribly run, had a ton of crashes and shut down due to lawsuits. A much better org came up in their place and is successful. I'm not saying I like lawsuits, but it can work out better.

4
1
Post a reply to: Gross Negligence by FELD / AMA

This forum thread has been locked.

The Latest