Ducati 450 front fender wing question..

Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 11:12am

Has anyone thought of how the massive wings on the front fender are going to make the bike fly different thru the air? I mean they're significant enough. I can imagine scrubbing or turning the bike sideways in the air, that you'd feel the air catching the front of the bike different. I know its not big, but I think is significant enough that you'd feel the air pressure against it when the bars are turned in the air on a moto track. Supercross you wouldn't feel it. But fast tracks with 40-50mph jumps I can easily see you feel the bike different in the air.

desmo450-mx- front fender.jpg?VersionId=jHdNmL5sNhGFepy9ltC

3
24
|
2/9/2024 8:06am

In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the aerodynamic ramifications of such a design alteration. It is imperative to acknowledge that the morphology of the front fender plays a pivotal role in dictating the aerodynamic envelope of a motocross bike, especially when traversing aerial trajectories.

The fender’s configuration—encompassing its geometrical form, dimensions, and spatial orientation—serves as a critical determinant in modulating the laminar and turbulent flow regimes encircling the motorcycle. This, in turn, influences the aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients, which are quintessential parameters governing the bike’s stability and maneuverability during flight phases.

Engaging in a quantification of the aerodynamic disparity induced by Ducati’s avant-garde fender vis-à-vis a traditional motocross fender necessitates an intricate examination. Such an analysis is predicated on the employment of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, a sophisticated modality that elucidates the fluidic interactions at play. These simulations are contingent upon a comprehensive understanding of the fenders’ physical characteristics and the environmental conditions under scrutiny.

Albeit the detailed specifications of Ducati’s fender and its conventional counterparts remain esoteric, one can infer that Ducati’s design innovation was not serendipitous but rather a meticulously calculated endeavor to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of their motocross bike. The objective, ostensibly, is to optimize airflow dynamics, attenuate aerodynamic drag, and augment the motorcycle’s aeromechanical comportment when airborne.

In summation, while the explicit aerodynamic benefits conferred by Ducati’s pioneering front fender design remain enveloped in theoretical speculation absent empirical validation through CFD analysis, it is plausible to conjecture that such innovations are geared towards realizing aerodynamic superiority. This discourse underscores the symbiotic nexus between aerodynamic engineering and motorcycle design, heralding a new epoch in motocross performance optimization.

17
17
2/9/2024 8:10am

Holy jargon garbage, speak normal...

2
27
2/9/2024 8:12am

Alright, imagine you're playing with a toy airplane, and you decide to tape a big paper fin on the front of it. When you throw it into the air, you notice it flies differently than before. This is kind of like what Ducati did with their new motocross bike; they changed the shape of the front part, which we call a fender.

Just like your toy airplane, the way the bike moves through the air can change based on how this front fender is shaped. If the fender is big, small, wide, or narrow, it can make the air move around the bike differently. This can make the bike go faster or slower, and even change how easy it is to control when it's jumping and flying through the air for a little bit.

Ducati probably spent a lot of time thinking and testing how to make their fender just right so that the bike performs better when it's racing, especially in the air. It's a bit like science magic – they use computers to test how air moves around different shapes to find the best one.

So, just like your airplane experiment, changing the shape of something can make it fly through the air in a new and possibly better way. Ducati is hoping their new fender helps their bike do just that!

5
7
2/9/2024 8:14am

No I understand it genius. But clearly you copy and pasted from somewhere.

3
15

The Shop

2/9/2024 8:14am

Non gpt answer: it will do sweet fuck all at mx speeds

40
1
soggy
Posts
8754
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
2/9/2024 8:16am

I don’t believe the speeds in moto are fast enough for aerodynamics to really come into play. 

10
2
bh84
Posts
1750
Joined
8/20/2012
Location
Peterborough, ON, CA
2/9/2024 8:18am

Ducati pioneered aero technology in MotoGP and have lead the way in it since. Not surprising they'd try to bring some of that success to their motocross program, especially with Paolo Ciabatti being involved. 

6
1
2/9/2024 8:18am

I knew it was GPT bullshit, so gay. Its just a simple opinion question. Is it going to affect the bike at high speed or not?

2
20
ILoveMoto
Posts
3598
Joined
3/15/2022
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 8:38am
Ridelow wrote:
In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the...

In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the aerodynamic ramifications of such a design alteration. It is imperative to acknowledge that the morphology of the front fender plays a pivotal role in dictating the aerodynamic envelope of a motocross bike, especially when traversing aerial trajectories.

The fender’s configuration—encompassing its geometrical form, dimensions, and spatial orientation—serves as a critical determinant in modulating the laminar and turbulent flow regimes encircling the motorcycle. This, in turn, influences the aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients, which are quintessential parameters governing the bike’s stability and maneuverability during flight phases.

Engaging in a quantification of the aerodynamic disparity induced by Ducati’s avant-garde fender vis-à-vis a traditional motocross fender necessitates an intricate examination. Such an analysis is predicated on the employment of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, a sophisticated modality that elucidates the fluidic interactions at play. These simulations are contingent upon a comprehensive understanding of the fenders’ physical characteristics and the environmental conditions under scrutiny.

Albeit the detailed specifications of Ducati’s fender and its conventional counterparts remain esoteric, one can infer that Ducati’s design innovation was not serendipitous but rather a meticulously calculated endeavor to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of their motocross bike. The objective, ostensibly, is to optimize airflow dynamics, attenuate aerodynamic drag, and augment the motorcycle’s aeromechanical comportment when airborne.

In summation, while the explicit aerodynamic benefits conferred by Ducati’s pioneering front fender design remain enveloped in theoretical speculation absent empirical validation through CFD analysis, it is plausible to conjecture that such innovations are geared towards realizing aerodynamic superiority. This discourse underscores the symbiotic nexus between aerodynamic engineering and motorcycle design, heralding a new epoch in motocross performance optimization.

If you don't work for NASA you should! 👨‍🚀

1
6
ILoveMoto
Posts
3598
Joined
3/15/2022
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 8:40am Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 8:42am
Ridelow wrote:
Alright, imagine you're playing with a toy airplane, and you decide to tape a big paper fin on the front of it. When you throw it...

Alright, imagine you're playing with a toy airplane, and you decide to tape a big paper fin on the front of it. When you throw it into the air, you notice it flies differently than before. This is kind of like what Ducati did with their new motocross bike; they changed the shape of the front part, which we call a fender.

Just like your toy airplane, the way the bike moves through the air can change based on how this front fender is shaped. If the fender is big, small, wide, or narrow, it can make the air move around the bike differently. This can make the bike go faster or slower, and even change how easy it is to control when it's jumping and flying through the air for a little bit.

Ducati probably spent a lot of time thinking and testing how to make their fender just right so that the bike performs better when it's racing, especially in the air. It's a bit like science magic – they use computers to test how air moves around different shapes to find the best one.

So, just like your airplane experiment, changing the shape of something can make it fly through the air in a new and possibly better way. Ducati is hoping their new fender helps their bike do just that!

Why not just add Red Bull to the fuel 

3
2
2/9/2024 8:40am
Ridelow wrote:
In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the...

In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the aerodynamic ramifications of such a design alteration. It is imperative to acknowledge that the morphology of the front fender plays a pivotal role in dictating the aerodynamic envelope of a motocross bike, especially when traversing aerial trajectories.

The fender’s configuration—encompassing its geometrical form, dimensions, and spatial orientation—serves as a critical determinant in modulating the laminar and turbulent flow regimes encircling the motorcycle. This, in turn, influences the aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients, which are quintessential parameters governing the bike’s stability and maneuverability during flight phases.

Engaging in a quantification of the aerodynamic disparity induced by Ducati’s avant-garde fender vis-à-vis a traditional motocross fender necessitates an intricate examination. Such an analysis is predicated on the employment of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, a sophisticated modality that elucidates the fluidic interactions at play. These simulations are contingent upon a comprehensive understanding of the fenders’ physical characteristics and the environmental conditions under scrutiny.

Albeit the detailed specifications of Ducati’s fender and its conventional counterparts remain esoteric, one can infer that Ducati’s design innovation was not serendipitous but rather a meticulously calculated endeavor to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of their motocross bike. The objective, ostensibly, is to optimize airflow dynamics, attenuate aerodynamic drag, and augment the motorcycle’s aeromechanical comportment when airborne.

In summation, while the explicit aerodynamic benefits conferred by Ducati’s pioneering front fender design remain enveloped in theoretical speculation absent empirical validation through CFD analysis, it is plausible to conjecture that such innovations are geared towards realizing aerodynamic superiority. This discourse underscores the symbiotic nexus between aerodynamic engineering and motorcycle design, heralding a new epoch in motocross performance optimization.

I kind of enjoyed how much this ChatGPT response hurt my brain and I don’t know why.

6
2/9/2024 8:50am

Wouldn't surprise me if its some kind of ram air induction that only opens up on big straights where if can get some proper air in.. has anyone seen the bike in person? Could there be space around the headstock injection to facilitate this?

1
1
Hman144
Posts
2131
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
York, PA, USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 8:58am
Ridelow wrote:
In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the...

In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the aerodynamic ramifications of such a design alteration. It is imperative to acknowledge that the morphology of the front fender plays a pivotal role in dictating the aerodynamic envelope of a motocross bike, especially when traversing aerial trajectories.

The fender’s configuration—encompassing its geometrical form, dimensions, and spatial orientation—serves as a critical determinant in modulating the laminar and turbulent flow regimes encircling the motorcycle. This, in turn, influences the aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients, which are quintessential parameters governing the bike’s stability and maneuverability during flight phases.

Engaging in a quantification of the aerodynamic disparity induced by Ducati’s avant-garde fender vis-à-vis a traditional motocross fender necessitates an intricate examination. Such an analysis is predicated on the employment of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, a sophisticated modality that elucidates the fluidic interactions at play. These simulations are contingent upon a comprehensive understanding of the fenders’ physical characteristics and the environmental conditions under scrutiny.

Albeit the detailed specifications of Ducati’s fender and its conventional counterparts remain esoteric, one can infer that Ducati’s design innovation was not serendipitous but rather a meticulously calculated endeavor to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of their motocross bike. The objective, ostensibly, is to optimize airflow dynamics, attenuate aerodynamic drag, and augment the motorcycle’s aeromechanical comportment when airborne.

In summation, while the explicit aerodynamic benefits conferred by Ducati’s pioneering front fender design remain enveloped in theoretical speculation absent empirical validation through CFD analysis, it is plausible to conjecture that such innovations are geared towards realizing aerodynamic superiority. This discourse underscores the symbiotic nexus between aerodynamic engineering and motorcycle design, heralding a new epoch in motocross performance optimization.

Yes.  And it's going to hold 14 lbs. of mud on top.

11
Village Idiot
Posts
2585
Joined
5/19/2023
Location
MXoN - a term used by newbs, goobs and rubes, PW, USA
2/9/2024 9:00am
soggy wrote:

I don’t believe the speeds in moto are fast enough for aerodynamics to really come into play. 

This

 

2
TK40_FC
Posts
637
Joined
5/17/2021
Location
Canton, OH, USA
2/9/2024 9:19am
Hman144 wrote:

Yes.  And it's going to hold 14 lbs. of mud on top.

Kinda what I thought too, bit of a mud-shovel. I expect to see a revised version when it hits the showroom, but we'll see. 

1
Luxon MX
Posts
1387
Joined
11/6/2017
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 9:20am

The problem with ChatGPT is that it's usually wrong. Ducati's fender design was formed from a tiny input from their engineering team and a major input from their industrial design/marketing team. Just like everyone else's bodywork designs. In general, motocross speeds are too slow for aero to come into play without massive structures involved. The (relatively) tiny change in the fender geometry will have no noticeable effect. 

16
1
MX Guy
Posts
2661
Joined
7/18/2016
Location
Southern, CA, USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 9:30am
Luxon MX wrote:
The problem with ChatGPT is that it's usually wrong. Ducati's fender design was formed from a tiny input from their engineering team and a major input...

The problem with ChatGPT is that it's usually wrong. Ducati's fender design was formed from a tiny input from their engineering team and a major input from their industrial design/marketing team. Just like everyone else's bodywork designs. In general, motocross speeds are too slow for aero to come into play without massive structures involved. The (relatively) tiny change in the fender geometry will have no noticeable effect. 

Is that why Carson Brown can scrub a bike from the 80’s the same as bikes from today? Wow, who knew! 

1
Falcon
Posts
12421
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA, USA
2/9/2024 9:34am
Luxon MX wrote:
The problem with ChatGPT is that it's usually wrong. Ducati's fender design was formed from a tiny input from their engineering team and a major input...

The problem with ChatGPT is that it's usually wrong. Ducati's fender design was formed from a tiny input from their engineering team and a major input from their industrial design/marketing team. Just like everyone else's bodywork designs. In general, motocross speeds are too slow for aero to come into play without massive structures involved. The (relatively) tiny change in the fender geometry will have no noticeable effect. 

I think you're right. I'd just hate for the wing to be just large enough that a strong crosswind catches someone off-guard right before landing and tweaks the steering position a little bit. Turns wheel, bike leans, rider high-sides. 

As for the garrulous description above:

 

 

1
TerryB
Posts
2829
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN, USA
2/9/2024 9:44am
motokiwi wrote:
Wouldn't surprise me if its some kind of ram air induction that only opens up on big straights where if can get some proper air in...

Wouldn't surprise me if its some kind of ram air induction that only opens up on big straights where if can get some proper air in.. has anyone seen the bike in person? Could there be space around the headstock injection to facilitate this?

To me, studying the pictures and looking at the fender's contours in relation to the radiators, it looks like they are simply splitting the air headed toward the front number plate, and directing it toward the radiators.

image 122

5
1
Gravel
Posts
1849
Joined
2/22/2014
Location
Ridgecrest, CA, USA
2/9/2024 9:47am
Ridelow wrote:
In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the...

In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the aerodynamic ramifications of such a design alteration. It is imperative to acknowledge that the morphology of the front fender plays a pivotal role in dictating the aerodynamic envelope of a motocross bike, especially when traversing aerial trajectories.

The fender’s configuration—encompassing its geometrical form, dimensions, and spatial orientation—serves as a critical determinant in modulating the laminar and turbulent flow regimes encircling the motorcycle. This, in turn, influences the aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients, which are quintessential parameters governing the bike’s stability and maneuverability during flight phases.

Engaging in a quantification of the aerodynamic disparity induced by Ducati’s avant-garde fender vis-à-vis a traditional motocross fender necessitates an intricate examination. Such an analysis is predicated on the employment of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, a sophisticated modality that elucidates the fluidic interactions at play. These simulations are contingent upon a comprehensive understanding of the fenders’ physical characteristics and the environmental conditions under scrutiny.

Albeit the detailed specifications of Ducati’s fender and its conventional counterparts remain esoteric, one can infer that Ducati’s design innovation was not serendipitous but rather a meticulously calculated endeavor to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of their motocross bike. The objective, ostensibly, is to optimize airflow dynamics, attenuate aerodynamic drag, and augment the motorcycle’s aeromechanical comportment when airborne.

In summation, while the explicit aerodynamic benefits conferred by Ducati’s pioneering front fender design remain enveloped in theoretical speculation absent empirical validation through CFD analysis, it is plausible to conjecture that such innovations are geared towards realizing aerodynamic superiority. This discourse underscores the symbiotic nexus between aerodynamic engineering and motorcycle design, heralding a new epoch in motocross performance optimization.

I can say the same thing, using only two words. Ugly Mudshovel.

5
3
2/9/2024 10:07am
HonDawg17 wrote:
Has anyone thought of how the massive wings on the front fender are going to make the bike fly different thru the air? I mean they're...

Has anyone thought of how the massive wings on the front fender are going to make the bike fly different thru the air? I mean they're significant enough. I can imagine scrubbing or turning the bike sideways in the air, that you'd feel the air catching the front of the bike different. I know its not big, but I think is significant enough that you'd feel the air pressure against it when the bars are turned in the air on a moto track. Supercross you wouldn't feel it. But fast tracks with 40-50mph jumps I can easily see you feel the bike different in the air.

desmo450-mx- front fender.jpg?VersionId=jHdNmL5sNhGFepy9ltC

lmao-crying-laughing

9
skeef
Posts
1448
Joined
7/18/2018
Location
USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 10:15am
Ridelow wrote:
In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the...

In the realm of motocross engineering, the introduction of Ducati’s new Motocross bike, adorned with a conspicuously unconventional front fender, has ignited a discourse on the aerodynamic ramifications of such a design alteration. It is imperative to acknowledge that the morphology of the front fender plays a pivotal role in dictating the aerodynamic envelope of a motocross bike, especially when traversing aerial trajectories.

The fender’s configuration—encompassing its geometrical form, dimensions, and spatial orientation—serves as a critical determinant in modulating the laminar and turbulent flow regimes encircling the motorcycle. This, in turn, influences the aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients, which are quintessential parameters governing the bike’s stability and maneuverability during flight phases.

Engaging in a quantification of the aerodynamic disparity induced by Ducati’s avant-garde fender vis-à-vis a traditional motocross fender necessitates an intricate examination. Such an analysis is predicated on the employment of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, a sophisticated modality that elucidates the fluidic interactions at play. These simulations are contingent upon a comprehensive understanding of the fenders’ physical characteristics and the environmental conditions under scrutiny.

Albeit the detailed specifications of Ducati’s fender and its conventional counterparts remain esoteric, one can infer that Ducati’s design innovation was not serendipitous but rather a meticulously calculated endeavor to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of their motocross bike. The objective, ostensibly, is to optimize airflow dynamics, attenuate aerodynamic drag, and augment the motorcycle’s aeromechanical comportment when airborne.

In summation, while the explicit aerodynamic benefits conferred by Ducati’s pioneering front fender design remain enveloped in theoretical speculation absent empirical validation through CFD analysis, it is plausible to conjecture that such innovations are geared towards realizing aerodynamic superiority. This discourse underscores the symbiotic nexus between aerodynamic engineering and motorcycle design, heralding a new epoch in motocross performance optimization.

I kind of enjoyed how much this ChatGPT response hurt my brain and I don’t know why.

It's fascinating how our brains sometimes revel in the challenge of grappling with complex or unconventional ideas. Engaging with content that stretches our mental boundaries can be oddly satisfying, even if it initially feels perplexing. It's like a mental workout that leaves us feeling strangely invigorated. Embracing the discomfort of cognitive dissonance can lead to new insights and perspectives, enriching our understanding of the world around us. So, while it may seem perplexing at first, perhaps there's a hidden pleasure in the mental gymnastics provoked by encountering novel concepts.

3
2
2/9/2024 10:18am
skeef wrote:
It's fascinating how our brains sometimes revel in the challenge of grappling with complex or unconventional ideas. Engaging with content that stretches our mental boundaries can...

It's fascinating how our brains sometimes revel in the challenge of grappling with complex or unconventional ideas. Engaging with content that stretches our mental boundaries can be oddly satisfying, even if it initially feels perplexing. It's like a mental workout that leaves us feeling strangely invigorated. Embracing the discomfort of cognitive dissonance can lead to new insights and perspectives, enriching our understanding of the world around us. So, while it may seem perplexing at first, perhaps there's a hidden pleasure in the mental gymnastics provoked by encountering novel concepts.

It is a matter of considerable fascination to delve into the complexities of our cerebral mechanisms, which exhibit a marked propensity for deriving satisfaction from the arduous endeavor of elucidating and internalizing notions that are either inherently intricate or markedly divergent from established norms. This intellectual engagement, which serves to stretch and challenge the capacities of our mental faculties, paradoxically engenders a form of gratification, notwithstanding its initial manifestation as a conundrum of perplexing nature. Such a process, akin to an onerous regimen of physical exertion, culminates in a state of mental rejuvenation. By purposefully navigating and embracing the discomfiture associated with cognitive dissonance, we facilitate the genesis of innovative insights and expansive vistas, thereby enhancing our interpretative schema of the labyrinthine intricacies that delineate our external milieu. Ergo, the seemingly enigmatic allure of engaging in the cogitative calisthenics, precipitated by exposure to novel and intellectually taxing stimuli, conceals an innate pleasure in the mastery and amplification of our cognitive domain, adorned with the lexicon of antiquated engineering vernacular to add a layer of historical depth and texture to our understanding.

2
7
ILoveMoto
Posts
3598
Joined
3/15/2022
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 10:19am

"You're traveling through another dimension - a dimension not only of sight and sound, but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land of imagination. Next stop, the Twilight Zone!"

5
1
Village Idiot
Posts
2585
Joined
5/19/2023
Location
MXoN - a term used by newbs, goobs and rubes, PW, USA
2/9/2024 10:52am
They just made room for a seat up there, that's all.

They just made room for a seat up there, that's all.

Screenshot 2024-02-09 at 10.34.25%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=zAPD5Nbifb6EoCXouhN3

 

 

1
2/9/2024 11:10am Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 11:13am
Ridelow wrote:
Alright, imagine you're playing with a toy airplane, and you decide to tape a big paper fin on the front of it. When you throw it...

Alright, imagine you're playing with a toy airplane, and you decide to tape a big paper fin on the front of it. When you throw it into the air, you notice it flies differently than before. This is kind of like what Ducati did with their new motocross bike; they changed the shape of the front part, which we call a fender.

Just like your toy airplane, the way the bike moves through the air can change based on how this front fender is shaped. If the fender is big, small, wide, or narrow, it can make the air move around the bike differently. This can make the bike go faster or slower, and even change how easy it is to control when it's jumping and flying through the air for a little bit.

Ducati probably spent a lot of time thinking and testing how to make their fender just right so that the bike performs better when it's racing, especially in the air. It's a bit like science magic – they use computers to test how air moves around different shapes to find the best one.

So, just like your airplane experiment, changing the shape of something can make it fly through the air in a new and possibly better way. Ducati is hoping their new fender helps their bike do just that!

So what did the 1981 CRs do in the air with their front number plate design ?? Nose dives?  Woohoo You and Rosso must have both flunked out of the same clown college. 

25b8be8b219e993a599479316bb786b5

8
2
McG194
Posts
4120
Joined
9/7/2017
Location
Palm Coast, FL, USA
2/9/2024 11:14am
HonDawg17 wrote:
Has anyone thought of how the massive wings on the front fender are going to make the bike fly different thru the air? I mean they're...

Has anyone thought of how the massive wings on the front fender are going to make the bike fly different thru the air? I mean they're significant enough. I can imagine scrubbing or turning the bike sideways in the air, that you'd feel the air catching the front of the bike different. I know its not big, but I think is significant enough that you'd feel the air pressure against it when the bars are turned in the air on a moto track. Supercross you wouldn't feel it. But fast tracks with 40-50mph jumps I can easily see you feel the bike different in the air.

desmo450-mx- front fender.jpg?VersionId=jHdNmL5sNhGFepy9ltC

Did I fall asleep and wake up in the offseason? 

7
ILoveMoto
Posts
3598
Joined
3/15/2022
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Fantasy
2/9/2024 11:14am

Compared to this the Honda didn't stand a chance! 

19907256973 b182a05762 b

7
1
2/9/2024 11:15am

Any Semi-Pro would be able to feel it. Even if its just a little bit. Not enough to throw the bike off balance, but definitely enough to feel it slightly.

12

Post a reply to: Ducati 450 front fender wing question..

The Latest