Cooper Webb post about going racing May 15th

mx 219
Posts
4045
Joined
8/15/2010
Location
South Central, PA, USA
4/24/2020 6:19pm
Hcallz5 wrote:
If the administration took action early instead of calling it a hoax we would have been done with this in March. instead here we are, numbers...
If the administration took action early instead of calling it a hoax we would have been done with this in March. instead here we are, numbers still climbing and now they're talking about injecting Lysol. I don't expect this shit storm to be over for months. At least we can still go ride I guess!
I think you have bigger problems if you really thought they were planning to inject or have us ingest Lysol.
26
8
4/24/2020 7:14pm
I like ken, but if he doesn’t wanna race, he doesn’t have to. Rest of the world isn’t gonna live in a bubble forever. Let’s get racing!
22
2
500guy
Posts
12468
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/24/2020 8:07pm
I like ken, but if he doesn’t wanna race, he doesn’t have to. Rest of the world isn’t gonna live in a bubble forever. Let’s get...
I like ken, but if he doesn’t wanna race, he doesn’t have to. Rest of the world isn’t gonna live in a bubble forever. Let’s get racing!
Amen to that!
2
1

The Shop

4/24/2020 9:44pm
Back on the SX track...


8
4/25/2020 1:52am
45ACP wrote:
Hate to see Ken buying into the fake news like so many others. They're doing a great job of creating this fear. The virus is here...
Hate to see Ken buying into the fake news like so many others. They're doing a great job of creating this fear. The virus is here. Social distancing and shutting things down is not going to get rid of it. More reports coming out daily showing that it's no more fatal than the flu. It's time to get back to our lives and let this thing run its course. If you are concerned, stay home but let the rest of us go about our business. This whole thing has been completely overblown.
Way to bitch about fake news in your first line, then follow it up with your own bullshit analysis on mortality rates.

Hypocrite
16
3
4/25/2020 3:36am
DonM wrote:
I’m thinking it’s a certain team manager that doesn’t allow his riders to race the MXDN....
This is what I feel too. It’s in Kawasaki’s interest to delay proceedings as long as possible in the hope that it will all just be...
This is what I feel too.

It’s in Kawasaki’s interest to delay proceedings as long as possible in the hope that it will all just be ended with no more races.

Kawasaki have the points lead to lose.
Honda have nothing to lose.
Disagree. Seems it’s pretty clear based on some Instagram posts on the previous page which camp might have an issue with getting back to racing. Funny...
Disagree. Seems it’s pretty clear based on some Instagram posts on the previous page which camp might have an issue with getting back to racing. Funny enough it’s the camp that you claim “has nothing to lose”.
Well I can see one big thing Kawasaki have got to lose that Honda currently doesn’t.

Exactly what do Kawasaki have to gain by there being any more SX races this year? It’s in their interest to draw a line under it right now.
2
2
Crush
Posts
21135
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney, AU
4/25/2020 3:38am
Well if it was Kenny/Honda that would explain Coop being salty...
5
Skip Intro
Posts
79
Joined
2/23/2020
Location
Wake Forest, NC, USA
4/25/2020 4:46am
Aren't we supposed to look down our noses at any low IQ people that want to #getrolling versus #stayhome? Cooper is from the South, even dumber. #imconfused
10
soggy
Posts
8981
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
4/25/2020 5:33am
Well I can see one big thing Kawasaki have got to lose that Honda currently doesn’t. Exactly what do Kawasaki have to gain by there being...
Well I can see one big thing Kawasaki have got to lose that Honda currently doesn’t.

Exactly what do Kawasaki have to gain by there being any more SX races this year? It’s in their interest to draw a line under it right now.
This comment is so dumb. For one if there is no more SX, there's nothing that says Feld would give Eli the Championship. Also even if they did it would be with the big asterisk and Kawi knows that. I think you are rooting for that to happen just so you can have something to hate on. I'm sure Eli would rather race in May then risk injury during outdoors. It's all probably a moot point. I don't see either series resuming.
2
6
brapgod69
Posts
297
Joined
12/26/2017
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
4/25/2020 5:36am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 5:36am
It sounds like some of y’all want to stay inside for the rest of your lives?
19
11
Ray_MXS
Posts
1154
Joined
10/28/2016
Location
SE
4/25/2020 6:10am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 6:10am
I like ken, but if he doesn’t wanna race, he doesn’t have to. Rest of the world isn’t gonna live in a bubble forever. Let’s get...
I like ken, but if he doesn’t wanna race, he doesn’t have to. Rest of the world isn’t gonna live in a bubble forever. Let’s get racing!
You guys are so quick on bashing Ken. If you had a condition, that if you went racing right now, you were in danger of fucking dying, and Feld called you up to hear what you thought about starting earlier than what's considered safe, what would you say?

Shuuure m8 I'll risk my life to go racing a month or two sooner than what I need to, no problem. My life isn't that important anyway.

Right.

The fact that people, some of you on here for example, doesn't take this seriously enough and that's why people are getting infected. It blows my mind you can't put the dots together.

And get off Kenny's back. I'm sure he will go racing if the racing starts up but don't blame the guy for not wanting to risk his life even more than he already is when the question is asked.
5
10
Silas444
Posts
647
Joined
5/23/2015
Location
Mid-state, ME, USA
4/25/2020 6:35am
WCRider wrote:
logan_140 wrote:
Also had the most amount of new cases in a single day in USA yesterday.
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it but it's crazy lethal, or everyone's getting it or has already had it and it's no more lethal than the flu without flu shots to thwart it.

PICK.
4
14
4/25/2020 6:39am
I like ken, but if he doesn’t wanna race, he doesn’t have to. Rest of the world isn’t gonna live in a bubble forever. Let’s get...
I like ken, but if he doesn’t wanna race, he doesn’t have to. Rest of the world isn’t gonna live in a bubble forever. Let’s get racing!
Ray_MXS wrote:
You guys are so quick on bashing Ken. If you had a condition, that if you went racing right now, you were in danger of fucking...
You guys are so quick on bashing Ken. If you had a condition, that if you went racing right now, you were in danger of fucking dying, and Feld called you up to hear what you thought about starting earlier than what's considered safe, what would you say?

Shuuure m8 I'll risk my life to go racing a month or two sooner than what I need to, no problem. My life isn't that important anyway.

Right.

The fact that people, some of you on here for example, doesn't take this seriously enough and that's why people are getting infected. It blows my mind you can't put the dots together.

And get off Kenny's back. I'm sure he will go racing if the racing starts up but don't blame the guy for not wanting to risk his life even more than he already is when the question is asked.
Says the guy from the country that didn’t shut down over the virus. We all have the same social distance, PPE , etc requirements as you as well.
1
4
Ray_MXS
Posts
1154
Joined
10/28/2016
Location
SE
4/25/2020 6:48am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 6:49am
TbonesPop wrote:
Says the guy from the country that didn’t shut down over the virus. We all have the same social distance, PPE , etc requirements as you...
Says the guy from the country that didn’t shut down over the virus. We all have the same social distance, PPE , etc requirements as you as well.
So you think I'm the one deciding on what to shut down or not?

What country I'm from doesn't matter in the slightest. Do you think a virus cares about where I'm from? We have idiots over here also that doesn't take it seriously enough.
6
2
soggy
Posts
8981
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
4/25/2020 6:49am
WCRider wrote:
logan_140 wrote:
Also had the most amount of new cases in a single day in USA yesterday.
Silas444 wrote:
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it...
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it but it's crazy lethal, or everyone's getting it or has already had it and it's no more lethal than the flu without flu shots to thwart it.

PICK.
1.it's highly contagious, more contagious then flu
2. Not that many people have had it when you look at the country as a whole. Less then 1%
3. not sure how you jump from most new cases to mortality rate is declining?
4. more people have died from it during quarantine then the flu.
6
3
tjnel
Posts
42
Joined
12/14/2019
Location
Portland, OR, USA
4/25/2020 7:44am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 7:52am
WCRider wrote:
logan_140 wrote:
Also had the most amount of new cases in a single day in USA yesterday.
Silas444 wrote:
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it...
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it but it's crazy lethal, or everyone's getting it or has already had it and it's no more lethal than the flu without flu shots to thwart it.

PICK.
Dude what? It takes like 20 days from onset to death. You think that just because the number of new confirmed cases goes up in a single day that the mortality rate is jumping around? The mortality rate is how many of those that get the virus die, not how many of those that got a test and were confirmed die... That’s why the fatality rate in the US today is showing as over 5%... because we are testing so few people. What this means is that the number of deaths from this in AZ in 20 days from now is likely still going to be at a similar level, or higher level, than the number of deaths they’re seeing now. This chart shows that mortality rate based on tested cases is over 5% and has changed over time, but the true underlying mortality rate Is likely about 1%. You can see in the chart that mortality rate based on tested/confirmed cases has gone up over time. That makes sense because we know the number of cases has increased substantially more than the number of confirmed cases because we are so shitty at testing.


The latest reports I’ve seen say that in NYC there are 10X as many people with the disease than the official count. That is consistent with the estimate for the true mortality rate across all groups of people being somewhere around 1%, which is exactly what the mortality rate estimate has for months. That number has nothing to do with how many people got tested and are reported in the case count...

The mortality rate may be as low as 0.5-0.6%, but it could be above 1%, we aren’t sure yet. However, what I can tell you is that this virus is 2-3 times as contagious as the flu, and the flu has a mortality rate of 0.1%, so this virus is at least 5X more deadly than the flu once you get it, and more likely 10X more deadly. I’m not sure if the chance of death changes with age as much for the flu, but I’m not sure why it wouldn’t, since very few young people die from that as well.

By the way, if that 10X the official case count statistic from NYC is true across the entire country, Then about 5% of the total US population would have been infected already. We need somewhere between 50-70% of the population to have had this thing to get herd immunity, so we’d have a longgggg way to go for that. Also, the number of cases in other areas of New York outside NYC did not have so many more true cases than reported ones, and this is all based on antibody tests that were performed, so we should expect that across the country less than 5% of people have already had it.
6
1
4/25/2020 8:49am
logan_140 wrote:
Also had the most amount of new cases in a single day in USA yesterday.
Silas444 wrote:
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it...
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it but it's crazy lethal, or everyone's getting it or has already had it and it's no more lethal than the flu without flu shots to thwart it.

PICK.
tjnel wrote:
Dude what? It takes like 20 days from onset to death. You think that just because the number of new confirmed cases goes up in a...
Dude what? It takes like 20 days from onset to death. You think that just because the number of new confirmed cases goes up in a single day that the mortality rate is jumping around? The mortality rate is how many of those that get the virus die, not how many of those that got a test and were confirmed die... That’s why the fatality rate in the US today is showing as over 5%... because we are testing so few people. What this means is that the number of deaths from this in AZ in 20 days from now is likely still going to be at a similar level, or higher level, than the number of deaths they’re seeing now. This chart shows that mortality rate based on tested cases is over 5% and has changed over time, but the true underlying mortality rate Is likely about 1%. You can see in the chart that mortality rate based on tested/confirmed cases has gone up over time. That makes sense because we know the number of cases has increased substantially more than the number of confirmed cases because we are so shitty at testing.


The latest reports I’ve seen say that in NYC there are 10X as many people with the disease than the official count. That is consistent with the estimate for the true mortality rate across all groups of people being somewhere around 1%, which is exactly what the mortality rate estimate has for months. That number has nothing to do with how many people got tested and are reported in the case count...

The mortality rate may be as low as 0.5-0.6%, but it could be above 1%, we aren’t sure yet. However, what I can tell you is that this virus is 2-3 times as contagious as the flu, and the flu has a mortality rate of 0.1%, so this virus is at least 5X more deadly than the flu once you get it, and more likely 10X more deadly. I’m not sure if the chance of death changes with age as much for the flu, but I’m not sure why it wouldn’t, since very few young people die from that as well.

By the way, if that 10X the official case count statistic from NYC is true across the entire country, Then about 5% of the total US population would have been infected already. We need somewhere between 50-70% of the population to have had this thing to get herd immunity, so we’d have a longgggg way to go for that. Also, the number of cases in other areas of New York outside NYC did not have so many more true cases than reported ones, and this is all based on antibody tests that were performed, so we should expect that across the country less than 5% of people have already had it.
You left out the part where people are dying and it is being marked that they died from COVID-19 even if they didn’t... I’d say the mortality rate is quite a bit lower than what it actually looks like as of right now.
8
19
tjnel
Posts
42
Joined
12/14/2019
Location
Portland, OR, USA
4/25/2020 9:24am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 9:34am
Silas444 wrote:
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it...
Which means the mortality rate is now plunging. You can't have it both ways. It's either far more dangerous than the flu because few have it but it's crazy lethal, or everyone's getting it or has already had it and it's no more lethal than the flu without flu shots to thwart it.

PICK.
tjnel wrote:
Dude what? It takes like 20 days from onset to death. You think that just because the number of new confirmed cases goes up in a...
Dude what? It takes like 20 days from onset to death. You think that just because the number of new confirmed cases goes up in a single day that the mortality rate is jumping around? The mortality rate is how many of those that get the virus die, not how many of those that got a test and were confirmed die... That’s why the fatality rate in the US today is showing as over 5%... because we are testing so few people. What this means is that the number of deaths from this in AZ in 20 days from now is likely still going to be at a similar level, or higher level, than the number of deaths they’re seeing now. This chart shows that mortality rate based on tested cases is over 5% and has changed over time, but the true underlying mortality rate Is likely about 1%. You can see in the chart that mortality rate based on tested/confirmed cases has gone up over time. That makes sense because we know the number of cases has increased substantially more than the number of confirmed cases because we are so shitty at testing.


The latest reports I’ve seen say that in NYC there are 10X as many people with the disease than the official count. That is consistent with the estimate for the true mortality rate across all groups of people being somewhere around 1%, which is exactly what the mortality rate estimate has for months. That number has nothing to do with how many people got tested and are reported in the case count...

The mortality rate may be as low as 0.5-0.6%, but it could be above 1%, we aren’t sure yet. However, what I can tell you is that this virus is 2-3 times as contagious as the flu, and the flu has a mortality rate of 0.1%, so this virus is at least 5X more deadly than the flu once you get it, and more likely 10X more deadly. I’m not sure if the chance of death changes with age as much for the flu, but I’m not sure why it wouldn’t, since very few young people die from that as well.

By the way, if that 10X the official case count statistic from NYC is true across the entire country, Then about 5% of the total US population would have been infected already. We need somewhere between 50-70% of the population to have had this thing to get herd immunity, so we’d have a longgggg way to go for that. Also, the number of cases in other areas of New York outside NYC did not have so many more true cases than reported ones, and this is all based on antibody tests that were performed, so we should expect that across the country less than 5% of people have already had it.
mattyhamz2 wrote:
You left out the part where people are dying and it is being marked that they died from COVID-19 even if they didn’t... I’d say the...
You left out the part where people are dying and it is being marked that they died from COVID-19 even if they didn’t... I’d say the mortality rate is quite a bit lower than what it actually looks like as of right now.
1. Where’s your source? Why do you think this is a widespread issue? Even if true in a few cases, why do you think it’d seriously skew the statistics?
2. This same argument can be made for every other cause of death. How does the same argument not apply to the flu?
3. There are reasons to believe other factors skew the death count to be too low. For example, we just found out some people in California died from Covid weeks Earlier than we thought anyone in the US had. Their cause of death wasn’t listed as covid initially. Anyone who died from it here before it was such a known issue was likely labeled as deaths due to pneumonia or influenza.

Taking all of that together, I don’t think you have much of an argument there.
3
6
Jt$
Posts
1129
Joined
11/2/2011
Location
Boise, ID, USA
4/25/2020 9:46am
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in time? The only possible way to avoid that would be to self quarantine EVERYONE for a year or more. That's not possible. I have been thinking through any logical way to avoid this being caught by the majority of mankind and can't figure it out. With the virus being so contagious and plans for the world to resume normal-ish activities, isn't it a logical conclusion that we will ALL catch this at some point?

I don't have an agenda on this, just sharing my thoughts. It feels like the general plan for flattening the curve is in knowing that we will indeed all catch this but not all at once.
17
1
aeffertz
Posts
12756
Joined
7/16/2015
Location
La Crosse, WI, USA
4/25/2020 10:05am
Jt$ wrote:
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in...
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in time? The only possible way to avoid that would be to self quarantine EVERYONE for a year or more. That's not possible. I have been thinking through any logical way to avoid this being caught by the majority of mankind and can't figure it out. With the virus being so contagious and plans for the world to resume normal-ish activities, isn't it a logical conclusion that we will ALL catch this at some point?

I don't have an agenda on this, just sharing my thoughts. It feels like the general plan for flattening the curve is in knowing that we will indeed all catch this but not all at once.
That’s pretty much how I feel at this point as well. The problem is anytime you start to mention “herd immunity” it is not going to be received well by a lot of people. Maybe this is the round about way of doing just that witho it actually saying it?

What if they did something like, anyone under 30 (and essential workers) can go out and about, mingle life their life’s like they used to and some people will get sick and the hospitals won’t be overwhelmed because only a percentage of the population is out exposing themselves. Then after a month, lift it to anyone 40 years-old and under can go out and after another month 50 and under. Hopefully by the time it gets to the elderly it will be easily handled. Just a uneducated thought, I am by no means a doctor.
1
7
tjnel
Posts
42
Joined
12/14/2019
Location
Portland, OR, USA
4/25/2020 10:08am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 10:10am
Jt$ wrote:
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in...
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in time? The only possible way to avoid that would be to self quarantine EVERYONE for a year or more. That's not possible. I have been thinking through any logical way to avoid this being caught by the majority of mankind and can't figure it out. With the virus being so contagious and plans for the world to resume normal-ish activities, isn't it a logical conclusion that we will ALL catch this at some point?

I don't have an agenda on this, just sharing my thoughts. It feels like the general plan for flattening the curve is in knowing that we will indeed all catch this but not all at once.
That’s a good question. The tricky part is how do we all catch it in as controlled a manner as possible, so that it doesn’t spread like wildfire and either overwhelm our hospitals or seem so scary that everyone stays at home and we get a recession anyway? If I were in charge I’d do the same thing a lot of governors are looking to do: Make sure there is a stabilization in case growth at a manageable level and that the healthcare system is well equipped before lifting a stay at home order, then lifting restrictions in phases. Allow businesses with low risk of transmission to open and also vital businesses like daycares. Mandate operations that will reduce spread to the extent possible. Watch what happens. If it seems okay, allow some more business types to open. If not, you’re forced to pull back such that health system capacity isn’t exceeded. Rinse and repeat. This is going to have to be a trial and error type of thing. We don’t know what we’re doing.
3
1
Ray_MXS
Posts
1154
Joined
10/28/2016
Location
SE
4/25/2020 10:30am
Jt$ wrote:
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in...
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in time? The only possible way to avoid that would be to self quarantine EVERYONE for a year or more. That's not possible. I have been thinking through any logical way to avoid this being caught by the majority of mankind and can't figure it out. With the virus being so contagious and plans for the world to resume normal-ish activities, isn't it a logical conclusion that we will ALL catch this at some point?

I don't have an agenda on this, just sharing my thoughts. It feels like the general plan for flattening the curve is in knowing that we will indeed all catch this but not all at once.
You are correct and they are counting on that something like 70%+ will get it, but that's not just why we are doing these things

We can't all get it at the same time. Health care wouldn't even be close to handling it. We need to stall as long as we can.
4
1
blockhead17
Posts
2856
Joined
6/13/2018
Location
Tokyo, JP
4/25/2020 10:50am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 10:51am
45ACP wrote:
Hate to see Ken buying into the fake news like so many others. They're doing a great job of creating this fear. The virus is here...
Hate to see Ken buying into the fake news like so many others. They're doing a great job of creating this fear. The virus is here. Social distancing and shutting things down is not going to get rid of it. More reports coming out daily showing that it's no more fatal than the flu. It's time to get back to our lives and let this thing run its course. If you are concerned, stay home but let the rest of us go about our business. This whole thing has been completely overblown.
This is quite possibly the dumbest thing I have ever read on vital, and that’s a pretty big call..
13
1
BobbyM
Posts
21436
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/25/2020 12:07pm
FlaNard wrote:
Yep. Not that I think it was that hard to figure out. I don't blame Ken, but like our Mayor (Salt Lake City) said today, "The...
Yep. Not that I think it was that hard to figure out. I don't blame Ken, but like our Mayor (Salt Lake City) said today, "The world will have to open up before the virus is gone." As uncomfortable as that fact may make some people it's the reality of it. It needs to be done safely and I'm not the guy to make that call but you can't stay inside and hope it just dies off. It will most likely never die off and people will continue to die from it even after a vaccine. At some point, whenever that is, life has to go on. Nobody can force Ken to race if he doesn't feel safe but a series also cannot stop because one of its stars doesn't want to participate.
aeffertz wrote:
I agree completely. I know people don’t like to hear it but I’m growing tired of the “Even one life is too much!” rederick. Of course...
I agree completely. I know people don’t like to hear it but I’m growing tired of the “Even one life is too much!” rederick. Of course every life is precious but at some point we need to take a realistic approach and understand likely the majority of the population is going to or has already came in contact with someone who has the virus and unfortunately some people are going to die... Live a healthy lifestyle and be as clean and smart as possible and get your flu shots when they become available.

And to expand on this, I’m not saying the way we handled this was overblown or anything like that. We were caught off guard and got hit with an unknown. Quarantining the entire country was an extreme measure but basically our only way to quickly slow the spreading of this unknown virus that was quickly taking people’s life’s. A nationwide quarantine is a band-aid fix to slow the spread and buy us time to learn about this virus and how to combat it. it is not a sustainable method. I would think two months of quarantine should give the powers that be enough time to gather enough data to move forward with reopening the country. We are lucky that this wasn’t something as contagious as it is but as dangerous as something like Ebola. Hopefully we can learn from this and not get caught with our pants down again because things could be a lot more grim.
I think sacrificing 20 lives to save 2000 lives is reasonable. Unreasonable if I'm one of the 20.
4
1
Mossy
Posts
438
Joined
7/6/2018
Location
Newport News, VA, USA
4/25/2020 12:18pm
Jt$ wrote:
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in...
I have a simple, uneducated, genuine question: with a vaccine over a year away, how can we not expect most of humanity to catch this in time? The only possible way to avoid that would be to self quarantine EVERYONE for a year or more. That's not possible. I have been thinking through any logical way to avoid this being caught by the majority of mankind and can't figure it out. With the virus being so contagious and plans for the world to resume normal-ish activities, isn't it a logical conclusion that we will ALL catch this at some point?

I don't have an agenda on this, just sharing my thoughts. It feels like the general plan for flattening the curve is in knowing that we will indeed all catch this but not all at once.
The interesting thing for me is how a lot of is remember being really sick back in Late November- Early January. It really makes me wonder, did we have it and not know it? I remember coughing my ass off and feeling like complete shit for a 2-3 weeks. My entire job was getting it too.

2
2
4/25/2020 12:25pm Edited Date/Time 4/25/2020 12:28pm
Well I can see one big thing Kawasaki have got to lose that Honda currently doesn’t. Exactly what do Kawasaki have to gain by there being...
Well I can see one big thing Kawasaki have got to lose that Honda currently doesn’t.

Exactly what do Kawasaki have to gain by there being any more SX races this year? It’s in their interest to draw a line under it right now.
As someone else mentioned there is no guarantee that they would just hand Eli and Kawasaki the title if it were to end, so to want it all to be over on the assumption that they would just seems foolish to me. Not to mention the fact that even if they don't end up going racing in May, the plan to race in the fall seems a lot more likely, at least in my opinion. I don't think calling an end to the series is even an option right now regardless of what Kawasaki might want.

Assuming the outdoor series happens in some fashion, Kawasaki will be going for their fourth straight title in that series. Don't you think it's in their best interest to finish supercross before the outdoors starts, regardless of the result, to have a rider who isn't worried about ruining two championships with one mistake?
1
4/25/2020 2:19pm
Well I can see one big thing Kawasaki have got to lose that Honda currently doesn’t. Exactly what do Kawasaki have to gain by there being...
Well I can see one big thing Kawasaki have got to lose that Honda currently doesn’t.

Exactly what do Kawasaki have to gain by there being any more SX races this year? It’s in their interest to draw a line under it right now.
soggy wrote:
This comment is so dumb. For one if there is no more SX, there's nothing that says Feld would give Eli the Championship. Also even if...
This comment is so dumb. For one if there is no more SX, there's nothing that says Feld would give Eli the Championship. Also even if they did it would be with the big asterisk and Kawi knows that. I think you are rooting for that to happen just so you can have something to hate on. I'm sure Eli would rather race in May then risk injury during outdoors. It's all probably a moot point. I don't see either series resuming.
Oh you’re one of the ‘asterisk’ guys...?

And you say my comment is so dumb?!🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
1
1

Post a reply to: Cooper Webb post about going racing May 15th

The Latest