An Informal Look at AMA C Class (updated page 3)

Jerkolantern
Posts
508
Joined
5/18/2016
Location
New Richland, MN, USA
5/31/2017 9:52am
I wanted to get the boys going this year in novice at Millville, I thought we'd look at a few vids of the novice class on you tube... we're watching and the top like five kids/men are hucking all fn obstacles like nothing! A flipping novice racer should NOT be able to hit 80' jumps like they're nothing. Totally intimidated the kids so we're looking for a backwoods track they can grow on before racing at Millville. Sand bagging is alive and well
jrminiquad
Posts
67
Joined
7/9/2013
Location
Salem, OH, USA
5/31/2017 10:24am
"and by the way. the "spread sheet" i would like to see it and scrutinize it a little bit as have been a part of appeals process and it's not a "money only" deal. If it was it sure the hell wouldn't be 50.00? 500.00 then yea it's a money deal. There is normally very few appeals."

My personal spreadsheet is nothing more than a list of the 19 riders who were advanced to B last year by the AMA because last years results ended up giving them an RPV over the limit to stay in B class. The sheet also included the actual RPV number, years they have raced C, what area qualifiers they entered in C, and the classes they were in.

If you do a rider search on 17 of those 19 riders on the AMA website, it then shows that their current status is "C" because of appeal to the AMA.

Don't know, couldn't get any answers. Just taking their advancement list and rider profiles at face value.
Bramlett321
Posts
1069
Joined
9/14/2012
Location
Texarkana, TX, USA
5/31/2017 10:25am
TXDirt wrote:
Good post bro. I agree with you. Would be interesting to go look at laptime charts from previous LL races to see how C class riders...
Good post bro. I agree with you. Would be interesting to go look at laptime charts from previous LL races to see how C class riders compare to B class riders.
I couldn't agree with you more...Hell I think they should add a damn "D" class so some of us squids may have a chance to make it lol. That post is a complete sign of our times and where the sport and peoples integrity is heading.
Tracktor
Posts
2343
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
The RTF/Amboy, WA, USA
5/31/2017 11:41am
jrminiquad wrote:
[i]"and by the way. the "spread sheet" i would like to see it and scrutinize it a little bit as have been a part of appeals...
"and by the way. the "spread sheet" i would like to see it and scrutinize it a little bit as have been a part of appeals process and it's not a "money only" deal. If it was it sure the hell wouldn't be 50.00? 500.00 then yea it's a money deal. There is normally very few appeals."

My personal spreadsheet is nothing more than a list of the 19 riders who were advanced to B last year by the AMA because last years results ended up giving them an RPV over the limit to stay in B class. The sheet also included the actual RPV number, years they have raced C, what area qualifiers they entered in C, and the classes they were in.

If you do a rider search on 17 of those 19 riders on the AMA website, it then shows that their current status is "C" because of appeal to the AMA.

Don't know, couldn't get any answers. Just taking their advancement list and rider profiles at face value.
This blows me away. Both my kids move up early for a couple reasons - One, racing with faster kids only makes them faster plus it's usually safer in B verses C. C has the biggest range of ability of any class B usually has the kids that are taking it at least kind of seriously so they don't do as much stupid stuff. Last year my older boy was injured three times by C riders in motos where they ran mixed B/C gates. (on starts and by lappers). Two, they prefer to tell people they race B/INT when asked verses JR/C. And we just race locally for fun. I don't see the point in a national C championship but that's just me.............

The Shop

Racer142
Posts
480
Joined
2/23/2015
Location
Byhalia, MS, USA
5/31/2017 11:44am Edited Date/Time 5/31/2017 11:50am
Racer142 wrote:
Why not make amateur racing more relevant? I listened to the pod cast the other night with DC and he mentioned a problem with the training...
Why not make amateur racing more relevant? I listened to the pod cast the other night with DC and he mentioned a problem with the training facilities and riders not racing locally and on the other side we have riders turning pro straight out of b class like Dungey Forney and Ciancarulo. Why not have simple rules like;

1. Any rider that has ever qualified for Loretta it's not eligible for C class

2. If you have never qualified for the national you must race C class and place top 15 in a regional to advance to B class. There will not be a C class at Loretta.

3. You may only advance to A after qualifying top 15 in a regional in the B class.

4. You may only earn your pro license after qualifying top 15 at a regional in the A class. You are not allowed to race professionally until the weekend directly following the Loretta Lynn national.

This would force riders to race their respective class and clear rules to move up. Numberso could easily be adjusted to fit the respective demand.
Tracktor wrote:
Well, that might work if AMA was the only promoter but they aren't. There is a much larger contingent of riders that have no desire to...
Well, that might work if AMA was the only promoter but they aren't. There is a much larger contingent of riders that have no desire to follow the AMA path of amateur racing.
On the other hand why should a kid race C when he wants to move to B right away and ride with faster riders? Same with being a local A which can pay pretty well.
Not everyone advances in speed the same so a "one size fits all" option doesn't really work...................
Personally I think this would actually increase participation at a local level for other promoter by not having to worry about being bumped to a higher class by allowing them to race a higher class locally and following the rules if they wish to follow the AMA. It might take a year or two to get sorted and those were just basic rules but the thought is improve competition locally and have a "logical" path to becoming a professional. Like if you wanted to mover to B class earlier make a provision for self advancement after qualifying for a regional with mandatory advancement after placing top 10 at a regional or any number of things like that. But this would cut dams bashing the c class and make riders compete in both the b and a class before earning their pro card. It would allow you to "legally" race the pro class locally if you wish but would be setting your "career" back by skipping Lorettas just to win the C class when the C class won't get the opportunity to race lorettas anyways. It would be a lot harder to sandbag the B class like that with kids coming up that skip the C class because they have previously qualified for Loretta lIke defransco and Deegan and Mumford.
mmain62
Posts
714
Joined
2/7/2013
Location
Knoxville, IL, USA
5/31/2017 1:42pm
I remember an LLAQ in like 07 the kid who won C class on a 125 was running the same lap times as the top 5 A class dudes. I mean come the heck on bro. You'd think he wouldn't even be able to pull his trailer home with all of the sandbags in the back of it.
Tracktor
Posts
2343
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
The RTF/Amboy, WA, USA
5/31/2017 1:48pm
Racer142 wrote:
Personally I think this would actually increase participation at a local level for other promoter by not having to worry about being bumped to a higher...
Personally I think this would actually increase participation at a local level for other promoter by not having to worry about being bumped to a higher class by allowing them to race a higher class locally and following the rules if they wish to follow the AMA. It might take a year or two to get sorted and those were just basic rules but the thought is improve competition locally and have a "logical" path to becoming a professional. Like if you wanted to mover to B class earlier make a provision for self advancement after qualifying for a regional with mandatory advancement after placing top 10 at a regional or any number of things like that. But this would cut dams bashing the c class and make riders compete in both the b and a class before earning their pro card. It would allow you to "legally" race the pro class locally if you wish but would be setting your "career" back by skipping Lorettas just to win the C class when the C class won't get the opportunity to race lorettas anyways. It would be a lot harder to sandbag the B class like that with kids coming up that skip the C class because they have previously qualified for Loretta lIke defransco and Deegan and Mumford.
From what I see sandbagging in B is pretty limited so not sure that's an issue. No matter how fast you are I am not sure you should ever be forced to go pro? That's a big step which often can take the fun out of riding.

The other issue is many places simply don't have qualifiers near them so it makes it prohibitive in cost to race AMA stuff. Here in the NW there are very few opportunities for A riders to earn AMA Pro points to be able to ride nationals unless they travel.

Local promoters want little to do with the AMA from what I have seen. Wanting everyone to conform to one set of standards would be tough and not good for amateur racing, imo..............I am not sure anyone really cares about the C class except those riding it. There are bigger problems with AM MX..........
Racer142
Posts
480
Joined
2/23/2015
Location
Byhalia, MS, USA
5/31/2017 2:53pm Edited Date/Time 5/31/2017 2:55pm
Tracktor wrote:
From what I see sandbagging in B is pretty limited so not sure that's an issue. No matter how fast you are I am not sure...
From what I see sandbagging in B is pretty limited so not sure that's an issue. No matter how fast you are I am not sure you should ever be forced to go pro? That's a big step which often can take the fun out of riding.

The other issue is many places simply don't have qualifiers near them so it makes it prohibitive in cost to race AMA stuff. Here in the NW there are very few opportunities for A riders to earn AMA Pro points to be able to ride nationals unless they travel.

Local promoters want little to do with the AMA from what I have seen. Wanting everyone to conform to one set of standards would be tough and not good for amateur racing, imo..............I am not sure anyone really cares about the C class except those riding it. There are bigger problems with AM MX..........
I think your missing my point. If anything this would encourage riders to race their local series under whatever rules they see fit without it affecting your standing with the AMA. So if you are an A rider locally but B on the national level you can compete with those who are going to challenge you locally and still race B nationally. This would effectively separate local non AMA and the AMA and encourage participation in both. The only forced advancement would come from doing well instead of RPV or racing a higher class locally for competition instead of beating up on slower riders because you aren't ready to move up on a national level. If you want to earn your pro card today as is you either have to earn enough points in AMA amateur nationals or race Loretta in the pro class so I don't understand how this would change anything for your local A riders in a non AMA series. It simply promotes working your way up though the classes appropriately. C would be reserved for novice riders with no national championship only regional championships and riders that have already been to Loretta would not be allowed (which is the current rule) and national championship would be for the B and A classes.
Racerxx
Posts
86
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Canyon Country, CA, USA
5/31/2017 7:49pm
Here in Southern California, we get kids from everywhere coming to compete. My son is just starting to win a few local events and occasionally break the top 10 at a National event it's just making him work harder riding with the faster kids. We know a few of the "sandbaggers" from the past couple of years they are from good families and truthfully it helps you get a step up in this industry and they have gained support from their good results so there's incentive to stay C sometimes. You always here "We are turning intermediate after Loretta's" or "after Mammoth". I see you're frustration with the reclassification the AMA should really look harder at what they are doing to the sport by creating these lifetime novices. When my son gets the nod he'll be moving up to B
jrminiquad
Posts
67
Joined
7/9/2013
Location
Salem, OH, USA
6/2/2017 8:48am
I am at the Ironman regional right now and one of the "non-competitive" riders who needed to appeal to stay in C is hitting the uphill triple.

C'mon bro...
jndmx
Posts
9699
Joined
1/20/2008
Location
South Kingston, RI, USA
6/2/2017 11:06am
SoCalMX70 wrote:
This reminds me of that big amateur event years ago where some kid sandbagged, won a truck... then had to give it back. What was that...
This reminds me of that big amateur event years ago where some kid sandbagged, won a truck... then had to give it back. What was that event called again? Spectacular failure if I am remembering it correctly...
Neverclear wrote:
Yeah, that was a crazy concept. If I remember correctly, the winner was from the UK.
That would be the infamous "Attack MX" race.
jrminiquad
Posts
67
Joined
7/9/2013
Location
Salem, OH, USA
6/14/2017 11:28am
I recently had the opportunity to attend both the Mid-East and North-East amateur regionals and have more data to add to the statistics (after this I'm tapping out).

Just to reiterate that the AMA classifications and appeals process is complete hogwash I submit the following:

At the Ironman regional the winner of both the 250C and 250C Ltd classes was won by a rider who appealed his B class promotion to the AMA because, according to the AMA rules, he was a non-competitive rider in C class and should be allowed to remain in C, yet he sweeps two classes in the regional and would have had a third if not for a wreck.

Same regional, another non-competitive C class rider takes the number two spot in 450C and yet another had a top ten in 250C JR Ltd.

Moving on to the Northeast regional at Pleasure Valley, both the 450C and 250C Ltd classes were won by an appealed rider, and had another in 7th. 250C Jr had one in top five, and 250C had one in 13th.

Bottom line, how can you submit an appeal to the AMA, have them review it and confirm that, yes indeed, you are non-competitive, you then go out and sweep areas and regionals, but yet it is not reviewed (per the AMA rules) and the AMA is OK with that.

The AMA needs to either revise or completely eliminate its published rules regarding the RPV, classification and appeals process because it is not worth the paper it is written on. I have submitted the proof, you can decide for yourselves. Thanks for listening to my ramblings.
Rct851
Posts
57
Joined
3/25/2017
Location
League City, TX, USA
6/14/2017 11:39am
My observation from a race this past Saturday-

There were probably 18 entries in the C class with only 3 entries in B.

Some of the C and B rider road together in another class with the C rider coming out on top.



ga_pike
Posts
2650
Joined
7/14/2011
Location
Valdosta, GA, USA
6/14/2017 12:15pm
I never understood the appeal of sandbagging and winning the C class. It's sort of like being the smartest moron or biggest asshole. Quite frankly, if C is a true novice class, then it shouldn't be represented at the amateur nationals IMO. C class should be used to gain experience and speed. Once you've gotten enough of both, you move to B class where you are now eligible to qualify for Loretta's. At this point, after you qualify at the B level, you should automatically be bumped to A class. Seriously, if you are one of the top 40 B riders in the country, then you deserve to move to the A class the following year.
Motoxdoc
Posts
2712
Joined
11/8/2009
Location
Steamboat Springs, CO, USA
6/14/2017 12:29pm
Looks like you did your homework, and your complaint is valid......now what?
Tracktor
Posts
2343
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
The RTF/Amboy, WA, USA
6/14/2017 12:33pm Edited Date/Time 6/14/2017 12:34pm
Rct851 wrote:
My observation from a race this past Saturday- There were probably 18 entries in the C class with only 3 entries in B. Some of the...
My observation from a race this past Saturday-

There were probably 18 entries in the C class with only 3 entries in B.

Some of the C and B rider road together in another class with the C rider coming out on top.



We see this in the NW all the time lucky to a have gate of 5 in any B class. To the point my 16 year old is kind of over racing. He is thinking about just going local pro so at least he can have people to race? Much of this is due to riders wanting to go to LL & had he stayed in C he would've had a decent shot...........
MxKing809
Posts
6374
Joined
10/13/2013
Location
Big Sand Whoops, MI, USA
Fantasy
6/14/2017 12:54pm
If you appeal and get dropped back down you should he excluded from Lorettas. Period.

You don't want to move to A? Ok that's fine, you're a local B rider, but you will NEVER go to LL in the B class again.
exbmxmx
Posts
159
Joined
2/13/2017
Location
Houston, TX, USA
6/14/2017 1:04pm
I can't believe how many times they have misspelled Candbagging.
jrminiquad
Posts
67
Joined
7/9/2013
Location
Salem, OH, USA
6/14/2017 1:11pm
Motoxdoc wrote:
Looks like you did your homework, and your complaint is valid......now what?
Nothing, dead in the water. I submitted the information to the AMA weeks ago and was just ignored.

You know the old saying... can't fight city hall.

Just putting the information out there, which I think most everybody already knew, and most don't give a hoot anyways.

They do have a fine roadside assistance program though.
6/14/2017 2:11pm
Racerxx wrote:
Here in Southern California, we get kids from everywhere coming to compete. My son is just starting to win a few local events and occasionally break...
Here in Southern California, we get kids from everywhere coming to compete. My son is just starting to win a few local events and occasionally break the top 10 at a National event it's just making him work harder riding with the faster kids. We know a few of the "sandbaggers" from the past couple of years they are from good families and truthfully it helps you get a step up in this industry and they have gained support from their good results so there's incentive to stay C sometimes. You always here "We are turning intermediate after Loretta's" or "after Mammoth". I see you're frustration with the reclassification the AMA should really look harder at what they are doing to the sport by creating these lifetime novices. When my son gets the nod he'll be moving up to B
I see you are local. What is your kids name? Are you guys heading to mammoth next week?
APLMAN99
Posts
12933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
6/14/2017 2:34pm
The entire notion of a C class national championship invites sandbagging or outright cheating. It shouldn't even exist.

Amateur national championship classes should only be by displacement, age, and stock/modified. Maybe throw in a Pro/Am so retired pros who haven't qualified for a National or Supercross in the last 5 years can participate......
Indy mxer
Posts
1883
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL, USA
6/14/2017 4:02pm
DC's silence on this subject is deafening. To me, LL's is a big money grab anyway.
Besides the C class being a joke, the vet classes are unfair as well.

They're called the "Amateur Nationals", yet the Vet classes are littered with ex-pro's.
You can work your ass off and spend a ton of money to get there. Then enjoy getting smoked by an ex-pro.
Once a pro, always a pro. imo

That said, I think DC has done a great job with the pro nats!!
Falcon
Posts
12606
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA, USA
6/14/2017 6:52pm
SoCalMX70 wrote:
This reminds me of that big amateur event years ago where some kid sandbagged, won a truck... then had to give it back. What was that...
This reminds me of that big amateur event years ago where some kid sandbagged, won a truck... then had to give it back. What was that event called again? Spectacular failure if I am remembering it correctly...
Neverclear wrote:
Yeah, that was a crazy concept. If I remember correctly, the winner was from the UK.
jndmx wrote:
That would be the infamous "Attack MX" race.
Adam Chatfield won it and was eventually disqualified. He raced AMA Supercross the following year, I'm pretty sure.
yz763
Posts
792
Joined
2/6/2009
Location
Altamonte Springs, FL, USA
6/14/2017 7:20pm
When I got bumped to A back in 2001, a wise man from District 15 once told me......."I would rather be the last of the some body's than the first of the no body's."
dedi684
Posts
1389
Joined
8/21/2009
Location
Ravena, NY, USA
6/14/2017 7:35pm
yz763 wrote:
When I got bumped to A back in 2001, a wise man from District 15 once told me......."I would rather be the last of the some...
When I got bumped to A back in 2001, a wise man from District 15 once told me......."I would rather be the last of the some body's than the first of the no body's."
Damn straight! It's become a joke where's anyone's pride these days. After 34 years of being a die hard Moto guy I think today's the day I say fuck it. I was supposed to pick up my son a new husky 50 and the dealer stiffed me. Hopefully it's a blessing in disguise. I race vet b and some dickhead thinks it's ok to race A class at gncc's and drop to B in Moto. Wtf
6/14/2017 7:44pm
Indy mxer wrote:
DC's silence on this subject is deafening. To me, LL's is a big money grab anyway. Besides the C class being a joke, the vet classes...
DC's silence on this subject is deafening. To me, LL's is a big money grab anyway.
Besides the C class being a joke, the vet classes are unfair as well.

They're called the "Amateur Nationals", yet the Vet classes are littered with ex-pro's.
You can work your ass off and spend a ton of money to get there. Then enjoy getting smoked by an ex-pro.
Once a pro, always a pro. imo

That said, I think DC has done a great job with the pro nats!!
I'm with you on the vet classes. I ride +25 novice and no way in hell do I want to try to qualify with guys like Reynard and the other that ride +25. I'd rather save my money and race locally in my class fairly, not spend thousands of dollars to drive halfway across the country knowing I'm going to get smoked back there by ex pros. No thanks!
JoJmoto
Posts
1783
Joined
11/8/2006
Location
Clarkesville, GA, USA
6/14/2017 7:59pm
Reading many of your posts, I have a feeling you guys are stuck in the 80's and 90's in regards to C class. Its certainly not the same class it was back then.

Yes, C class should be for up and comers however, this class has turned highly competitive at the "National" level. Locally its still more so like its design but defiantly not at the National level.

Training facilities are full of "C" class riders who yes, could be a top 10 B class National rider as well. And every year, I can count at least 6 kids I never heard of coming out of the wood work here in the SouthEast.
6/14/2017 8:07pm
Neverclear wrote:
Yeah, that was a crazy concept. If I remember correctly, the winner was from the UK.
jndmx wrote:
That would be the infamous "Attack MX" race.
Falcon wrote:
Adam Chatfield won it and was eventually disqualified. He raced AMA Supercross the following year, I'm pretty sure.
At least Chatfield came by his cheating fairly naturally.

His Step-Mom, Jong Ock Mao, was busted for running a brothel here in Texas at his practice facility (MX Oasis) that same year. Oh, and human smuggling was involved.Dry

From 2008
Bail Set For Santa Ana Alleged Brothel Operator

(CBS) SANTA ANA

A magistrate in Santa Ana set bail at $100,000 Wednesday for a man, 51, arrested for his alleged role in the operation of brothels where women worked as prostitutes to pay off smuggling fees.

Randall Johnson of Los Angeles was named in a 40-count grand jury indictment, along with alleged brothel operator Jong Ock Mao, 47, of West Covina, Edward Lutt, 43, of Paramount, and Charles Fields, 49, of Long Beach, who remains a fugitive, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Carmen Luege.

Johnson and Lutt, who was in court Tuesday, were ordered to appear Monday for arraignment in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, Luege said.

Mao was arrested in Madisonville, Texas, Tuesday and appeared Wednesday in a Houston courtroom, where her bail was set at $150,000, Luege said.

It was not known if she would be returned to California by Monday to appear for arraignment, Luege said.

Search warrants were served Tuesday at eight Los Angeles-area locations, including three suspected brothels in Baldwin Park, Inglewood and South Gate, and three homes, including those of Mao and Lutt and the Canyon Country residence of Mao's bookkeeper, Virginia Kice of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said.

ICE agents in Dallas searched a suspected brothel known as the Paradise Spa, where four women were taken into custody, Kice said. Two were booked on state prostitution charges, and the other two were being held on administrative immigration violations, she said.

Charges against Mao, Lutt, Fields and Johnson include conspiracy, money laundering and using the mails to set up an illegal business, such as sending applications for licenses to Sacramento and Dallas, Kice said.

According to search warrant affidavits, the three men filed business licenses to operate massage parlors and tanning salons in Southern California and Dallas that served as fronts for brothels operated by Mao.

The indictment was an offshoot of an ongoing investigation that initially targeted the Jung Organization, which smuggled South Korean women into the United States and turned them over to brothel operators to work off fees as high as $15,000, Luege said.

Fifteen of the two-dozen people charged in that case, including Young Joon Jung, have pleaded guilty. Five are awaiting trial and four remain at large, Luege said.

The four people charged in the latest indictment, which was returned by a grand jury on April 5 and unsealed Tuesday, do not face smuggling charges.

"They are the end users of the smuggling chain," said supervising ICE Agent Buckley Thomas. "They were not the people responsible for smuggling." Dozens of women were caught up in the operations, Thomas said.
Most of the women knew they were coming to the United States to work as prostitutes and did so willingly, but investigators will try to determine if any of them were victimized in other ways, such as being held against their will, Kice said.

They will be interviewed for a decision on whether they should be prosecuted or deported, Kice said.

Federal agents are looking to seize more than $4 million in assets tied to the alleged criminal scheme, including bank accounts, residences and four private motocross tracks in California, Texas and Florida. The tracks are operated by a company Mao owns called MX Oasis
JoJmoto
Posts
1783
Joined
11/8/2006
Location
Clarkesville, GA, USA
6/14/2017 8:12pm
jrminiquad wrote:
I recently had the opportunity to attend both the Mid-East and North-East amateur regionals and have more data to add to the statistics (after this I'm...
I recently had the opportunity to attend both the Mid-East and North-East amateur regionals and have more data to add to the statistics (after this I'm tapping out).

Just to reiterate that the AMA classifications and appeals process is complete hogwash I submit the following:

At the Ironman regional the winner of both the 250C and 250C Ltd classes was won by a rider who appealed his B class promotion to the AMA because, according to the AMA rules, he was a non-competitive rider in C class and should be allowed to remain in C, yet he sweeps two classes in the regional and would have had a third if not for a wreck.

Same regional, another non-competitive C class rider takes the number two spot in 450C and yet another had a top ten in 250C JR Ltd.

Moving on to the Northeast regional at Pleasure Valley, both the 450C and 250C Ltd classes were won by an appealed rider, and had another in 7th. 250C Jr had one in top five, and 250C had one in 13th.

Bottom line, how can you submit an appeal to the AMA, have them review it and confirm that, yes indeed, you are non-competitive, you then go out and sweep areas and regionals, but yet it is not reviewed (per the AMA rules) and the AMA is OK with that.

The AMA needs to either revise or completely eliminate its published rules regarding the RPV, classification and appeals process because it is not worth the paper it is written on. I have submitted the proof, you can decide for yourselves. Thanks for listening to my ramblings.
Not sure if its a typo or your understanding of the rule is not correct.. The "Non-competitive" rider mean a rising C rider can't compete against the B class riders and therefore allowed to move back down. (For not being any competition for the B riders)
Racerxx
Posts
86
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Canyon Country, CA, USA
6/14/2017 9:28pm
Racerxx wrote:
Here in Southern California, we get kids from everywhere coming to compete. My son is just starting to win a few local events and occasionally break...
Here in Southern California, we get kids from everywhere coming to compete. My son is just starting to win a few local events and occasionally break the top 10 at a National event it's just making him work harder riding with the faster kids. We know a few of the "sandbaggers" from the past couple of years they are from good families and truthfully it helps you get a step up in this industry and they have gained support from their good results so there's incentive to stay C sometimes. You always here "We are turning intermediate after Loretta's" or "after Mammoth". I see you're frustration with the reclassification the AMA should really look harder at what they are doing to the sport by creating these lifetime novices. When my son gets the nod he'll be moving up to B
mattyhamz2 wrote:
I see you are local. What is your kids name? Are you guys heading to mammoth next week?
We are leaving for Mammoth in the morning my son is Justin Richards #87 on a Yamaha he's entered in the 450C and 250CJr class. He'll also be riding the Support class on VET weekend against Darryn Durham so we'll see where his speed is at. He likes me to get pictures of him lining up with the fast guys. Are you heading to Mammoth?

Post a reply to: An Informal Look at AMA C Class (updated page 3)

The Latest