Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Air Forks suck.
Nevermind that I have a set of PC Bullt PSF-1s that work better than anything-else I've ever had (ML can tell you about some of the really good KYB Spring-Kit stuff that most of us prefered BEFORE PSF-1s).
Nevermind the Shorty has been running Air-EXCLUSIVELY for what...? 3 seasons..? & he ain't going back...
Nevermind that AERs are getting Rave Reviews and have been seen on someone's "Practice Bikes" at his Ranch... STOCK A E Rs...
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Interesting turn of events...I wonder what data exactly they were "acquiring." Must have thought it was valuable enough to risk running "the system" in race conditions...or maybe they didn't see any risk...?
I have a feeling this won't be the last mechanical to play a part in things this summer.
the conspiracy theories come when there isn't any solid info or when a team acts like there is a conspiracy!
this is some solid info thanks! and quickly reported on.
That flat head fastener has to have 2 points of sealing to make that elbow fitting adjustable, so that rubber hose can be adjust in a direction out of the way.
The hose it self can be puncture and the hose to fitting area can leak.
If they are reading pressure with a pressure transducer located somewhere else on the bike, that little rubber hose just looks like it was destined to fail.
Just saying
Pit Row
KR led moto one and should have won. His "air fork" lost pressure, regardless of why, and cost him the race, period. At this level the idea is to eliminate as many "failures" as possible in the garage. This is everything from moose tubes to safety wiring the steering stem nut. You do not run anything that you knowingly can cost you a race if possible. So, given the choice between air and springs, I would think springs will be less likely to fail than air. So, as a race team manager I would push for running springs. The likelihood of failure is less than air, obviously.
This is my point, regardless of the why or how much the part cost. Who cares. That part may end up costing thousands and thousands.
Star Racing riders have a choice... For SX 4 out of 5 rider chose air, for outdoors 3 out of 5 riders chose air.
Geico Honda had a large stock of Showa twin-chamber spring forks and chose to purchase a full batch of KYB PSF1 forks before the 2015 season.
At Honda, the riders have a choice and guess what they're all running... PSF1...
Spring inside the fork breaks in 1/2 - can't go anywhere. Stuck inside the tube. Spring rate of each spring is doubled, yet used in a series so spring rate stays the same = rider finishes the race.
Data acquisition fails on spring fork - feels like subtanks, rider essentially unaffected.
You can look at it any way you want, but the air cost him the race.
Post a reply to: The Part that Failed on Ken Roczen's Forks