Will Loretta Lynns Be Shown Live On Racer TV?

joshd
Posts
801
Joined
3/17/2016
Location
Lucedale, MS, USA
7/18/2026 10:50am
Show me how you know this?  Who was paying Racer TV for the broadcast in prior years?  Do you think they just showed up as volunteers...

Show me how you know this?  Who was paying Racer TV for the broadcast in prior years?  Do you think they just showed up as volunteers to offer a stream for free?  Do you have any clue how much that costs?  My guess is Lucas Oil was absorbing the cost for that and others and decided to include a bunch of motorsports to Flo.  The racing added to Flo is much more than MX Sports events.....includes Mammoth (not MX Sports) Flat Track (not MX Sports) and Endurocross (not MX Sports).  I am not saying DC is perfect, but holy shit some of you don't know anything and just yell at the clouds.

yak651 wrote:
So “my guess” yet you are yelling at the clouds about others offering their guess?? Yeah MXSports had zero input on going to Flo and getting...

So “my guess” yet you are yelling at the clouds about others offering their guess?? Yeah MXSports had zero input on going to Flo and getting paid 🤦‍♂️

Others are not saying "guess", they are assuming this was an MX sports choice and it clearly was not since it involves so many more events...

Others are not saying "guess", they are assuming this was an MX sports choice and it clearly was not since it involves so many more events and MX Sports does not own or operate Racer TV.  How is that hard to understand?  

I guess DC should have created a broadcast company, hired a crew, and stream it for free?  

Bro. DC ain’t gonna let you hit. 

5
5
Tyler D
Posts
2369
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
La, CA, USA
7/18/2026 10:52am
You guys know DC and MX Sports do not operate Racer TV right?  Lucas Oil does and they made the choice to charge for it.  It's...

You guys know DC and MX Sports do not operate Racer TV right?  Lucas Oil does and they made the choice to charge for it.  It's really expensive to pay a crew and stream live for 6 days.  

Tyler D wrote:
i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

image 3428

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to...

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to Flo.  The new ownership likely took over last year and then decided doing Loretta's for free was a terrible business decision.  Again, NOT decided by MX Sports and includes a full suite of stuff Racer TV broadcasts

 

https://racer.com/2025/03/27/mavtv-acquired-to-be-rebranded-racer

the broadcast rights originated with MX Sports at some point though right? if the alternative to flo sports is doing nothing, because lucas oil isn't funding it, then i guess, but it doesn't look like lucas funded it in 2024, so who did? 

when did mx sports give up the broadcast rights to their own event and why/for what consideration?

4
USA
Posts
2606
Joined
9/4/2016
Location
Richmond, TX, USA
Fantasy
7/18/2026 11:54am
You guys know DC and MX Sports do not operate Racer TV right?  Lucas Oil does and they made the choice to charge for it.  It's...

You guys know DC and MX Sports do not operate Racer TV right?  Lucas Oil does and they made the choice to charge for it.  It's really expensive to pay a crew and stream live for 6 days.  

Tyler D wrote:
i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

image 3428

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to...

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to Flo.  The new ownership likely took over last year and then decided doing Loretta's for free was a terrible business decision.  Again, NOT decided by MX Sports and includes a full suite of stuff Racer TV broadcasts

 

https://racer.com/2025/03/27/mavtv-acquired-to-be-rebranded-racer

Donny, you're out of your element 

2
2
7/18/2026 1:14pm Edited Date/Time 7/18/2026 1:23pm

$40 bucks a month huh? So unfortunate for people everywhere that like to watch. Would be really interesting to hear how many people actually sign up to pay that. You think 1000 people will even do so? That's only 40k if even 1000 people were to do so. Minus all expenses and whatever percentage split is agreed upon. The Racer TV broadcast on Youtube was great and the proper way to broadcast the LL races. Now you just have to "FLO" out more money, and its even more expensive than Peacock at 9 to 12 bucks a month to watch all the Supercross and National races....bummer!  

(Im sure this post will make a difference 😁) 

Who are the 5 tards that down voted my question? 👎  

14
1

The Shop

8tensolutions
Posts
3475
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
7/18/2026 2:04pm
Tyler D wrote:
i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

image 3428

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to...

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to Flo.  The new ownership likely took over last year and then decided doing Loretta's for free was a terrible business decision.  Again, NOT decided by MX Sports and includes a full suite of stuff Racer TV broadcasts

 

https://racer.com/2025/03/27/mavtv-acquired-to-be-rebranded-racer

Tyler D wrote:
the broadcast rights originated with MX Sports at some point though right? if the alternative to flo sports is doing nothing, because lucas oil isn't funding...

the broadcast rights originated with MX Sports at some point though right? if the alternative to flo sports is doing nothing, because lucas oil isn't funding it, then i guess, but it doesn't look like lucas funded it in 2024, so who did? 

when did mx sports give up the broadcast rights to their own event and why/for what consideration?

I didn't say they gave up broadcast rights.  Should they PAY to broadcast their own race?

4
8tensolutions
Posts
3475
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
7/18/2026 2:05pm
Tyler D wrote:
i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

i dont know, but why is amsoil presenting sponsor at same time racertv is operating if lucas oil controls racertv? this was from 2024

image 3428

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to...

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to Flo.  The new ownership likely took over last year and then decided doing Loretta's for free was a terrible business decision.  Again, NOT decided by MX Sports and includes a full suite of stuff Racer TV broadcasts

 

https://racer.com/2025/03/27/mavtv-acquired-to-be-rebranded-racer

USA wrote:

Donny, you're out of your element 

huh?

3
Tyler D
Posts
2369
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
La, CA, USA
7/18/2026 4:52pm
My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to...

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to Flo.  The new ownership likely took over last year and then decided doing Loretta's for free was a terrible business decision.  Again, NOT decided by MX Sports and includes a full suite of stuff Racer TV broadcasts

 

https://racer.com/2025/03/27/mavtv-acquired-to-be-rebranded-racer

Tyler D wrote:
the broadcast rights originated with MX Sports at some point though right? if the alternative to flo sports is doing nothing, because lucas oil isn't funding...

the broadcast rights originated with MX Sports at some point though right? if the alternative to flo sports is doing nothing, because lucas oil isn't funding it, then i guess, but it doesn't look like lucas funded it in 2024, so who did? 

when did mx sports give up the broadcast rights to their own event and why/for what consideration?

I didn't say they gave up broadcast rights.  Should they PAY to broadcast their own race?

potentially, yes. how is it out of their hands if they still have broadcast rights? 

1
8tensolutions
Posts
3475
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
7/18/2026 5:12pm
Tyler D wrote:
the broadcast rights originated with MX Sports at some point though right? if the alternative to flo sports is doing nothing, because lucas oil isn't funding...

the broadcast rights originated with MX Sports at some point though right? if the alternative to flo sports is doing nothing, because lucas oil isn't funding it, then i guess, but it doesn't look like lucas funded it in 2024, so who did? 

when did mx sports give up the broadcast rights to their own event and why/for what consideration?

I didn't say they gave up broadcast rights.  Should they PAY to broadcast their own race?

Tyler D wrote:

potentially, yes. how is it out of their hands if they still have broadcast rights? 

I never said it was out of their hands.  I said if Racer wanted to quit giving it away, the only option would be to pay another broadcast team or start their own which would cost a fortune and makes no sense.  It's amazing how many complain when something was free for years, then it gets behind a paywall and everyone cries about it.  Nobody is forcing you to watch it.

1
5
LoudLove
Posts
2927
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
7/18/2026 5:13pm

So basically everyone values live LL broadcast at $0 and want whoever is responsible for that broadcast to absorb the costs. You see where this is going, right?  What business venture would succeed by catering to a customer who’s not willing to pay for the service?

5
10
Tyler D
Posts
2369
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
La, CA, USA
7/18/2026 5:42pm Edited Date/Time 7/18/2026 5:42pm

I didn't say they gave up broadcast rights.  Should they PAY to broadcast their own race?

Tyler D wrote:

potentially, yes. how is it out of their hands if they still have broadcast rights? 

I never said it was out of their hands.  I said if Racer wanted to quit giving it away, the only option would be to pay...

I never said it was out of their hands.  I said if Racer wanted to quit giving it away, the only option would be to pay another broadcast team or start their own which would cost a fortune and makes no sense.  It's amazing how many complain when something was free for years, then it gets behind a paywall and everyone cries about it.  Nobody is forcing you to watch it.

its kind of a false dichotomy tho. there's paying to watch it and then there's paying 2.5x the cost of AppleTV (which now includes F1 btw..which used to be ~$90 a YEAR for f1 f2 f3) for a service with a known track record of piss poor production quality and borderline fraudulent business practices. 

he literally could have picked anybody besides flo and caught 20% of the flak hes catching now, but he probably picked them because of the lucrative (on paper) royalty structure. 

4
1
The Moth
Posts
321
Joined
2/3/2023
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
7/18/2026 6:58pm
$40 bucks a month huh? So unfortunate for people everywhere that like to watch. Would be really interesting to hear how many people actually sign up...

$40 bucks a month huh? So unfortunate for people everywhere that like to watch. Would be really interesting to hear how many people actually sign up to pay that. You think 1000 people will even do so? That's only 40k if even 1000 people were to do so. Minus all expenses and whatever percentage split is agreed upon. The Racer TV broadcast on Youtube was great and the proper way to broadcast the LL races. Now you just have to "FLO" out more money, and its even more expensive than Peacock at 9 to 12 bucks a month to watch all the Supercross and National races....bummer!  

(Im sure this post will make a difference 😁) 

Who are the 5 tards that down voted my question? 👎  

I upvoted you bro. Man, are you going to get anymore ride fast die punk shirts?  Be cool to see a hoodie with that on it. 

1
1
8tensolutions
Posts
3475
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
7/18/2026 7:16pm Edited Date/Time 7/18/2026 7:21pm
Tyler D wrote:

potentially, yes. how is it out of their hands if they still have broadcast rights? 

I never said it was out of their hands.  I said if Racer wanted to quit giving it away, the only option would be to pay...

I never said it was out of their hands.  I said if Racer wanted to quit giving it away, the only option would be to pay another broadcast team or start their own which would cost a fortune and makes no sense.  It's amazing how many complain when something was free for years, then it gets behind a paywall and everyone cries about it.  Nobody is forcing you to watch it.

Tyler D wrote:
its kind of a false dichotomy tho. there's paying to watch it and then there's paying 2.5x the cost of AppleTV (which now includes F1 btw..which...

its kind of a false dichotomy tho. there's paying to watch it and then there's paying 2.5x the cost of AppleTV (which now includes F1 btw..which used to be ~$90 a YEAR for f1 f2 f3) for a service with a known track record of piss poor production quality and borderline fraudulent business practices. 

he literally could have picked anybody besides flo and caught 20% of the flak hes catching now, but he probably picked them because of the lucrative (on paper) royalty structure. 

  1.  He could have picked anybody?  Are there numerous broadcast companies that specialize in motorsports?  Nope, there are not.  That's why RACER productions exists.
  2. Are there multiple streaming platforms that would want to stream it?  Who knows?
  3. What if he did pick it because it was the most lucrative?  It's their business and they get the choice to do that, just like you have the choice to watch it. 

The entitlement is real.  MX Sports has zero responsibility to stream anything for free.  Tour de France is not free.  SX is not free.  Movies are not free.  Basically nothing is and that's what it takes to stay in business.

11
Buckland
Posts
373
Joined
1/23/2017
Location
USA
7/18/2026 9:06pm
 He could have picked anybody?  Are there numerous broadcast companies that specialize in motorsports?  Nope, there are not.  That's why RACER productions exists.Are there multiple streaming...
  1.  He could have picked anybody?  Are there numerous broadcast companies that specialize in motorsports?  Nope, there are not.  That's why RACER productions exists.
  2. Are there multiple streaming platforms that would want to stream it?  Who knows?
  3. What if he did pick it because it was the most lucrative?  It's their business and they get the choice to do that, just like you have the choice to watch it. 

The entitlement is real.  MX Sports has zero responsibility to stream anything for free.  Tour de France is not free.  SX is not free.  Movies are not free.  Basically nothing is and that's what it takes to stay in business.

When you sell a bazillion advertisements to companies that understand the viewers will be seeing them via a free stream, that's not "streaming for free." 

Now they'll still sell a bazillion advertisements, and charge viewers a ridiculous subscription fee on top of it. It sucks for the fans, and it sucks for the participants.

8
8tensolutions
Posts
3475
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
7/18/2026 9:18pm
 He could have picked anybody?  Are there numerous broadcast companies that specialize in motorsports?  Nope, there are not.  That's why RACER productions exists.Are there multiple streaming...
  1.  He could have picked anybody?  Are there numerous broadcast companies that specialize in motorsports?  Nope, there are not.  That's why RACER productions exists.
  2. Are there multiple streaming platforms that would want to stream it?  Who knows?
  3. What if he did pick it because it was the most lucrative?  It's their business and they get the choice to do that, just like you have the choice to watch it. 

The entitlement is real.  MX Sports has zero responsibility to stream anything for free.  Tour de France is not free.  SX is not free.  Movies are not free.  Basically nothing is and that's what it takes to stay in business.

Buckland wrote:
When you sell a bazillion advertisements to companies that understand the viewers will be seeing them via a free stream, that's not "streaming for free." Now they'll...

When you sell a bazillion advertisements to companies that understand the viewers will be seeing them via a free stream, that's not "streaming for free." 

Now they'll still sell a bazillion advertisements, and charge viewers a ridiculous subscription fee on top of it. It sucks for the fans, and it sucks for the participants.

Again, I am sure you have some sort of proof they told sponsors it would be streamed for free??  No you don't, just more making shit up. 

1
6
Buckland
Posts
373
Joined
1/23/2017
Location
USA
7/18/2026 9:36pm
Again, I am sure you have some sort of proof they told sponsors it would be streamed for free??  No you don't, just more making shit...

Again, I am sure you have some sort of proof they told sponsors it would be streamed for free??  No you don't, just more making shit up. 

You're right, sponsors pay for advertising without knowing how/who will be consuming it. No I don't have proof of the contract, but let's use a little bit of critical thinking here and use our imaginations on an internet discussion board. It wasn't being "streamed for free" at any point.

3
8tensolutions
Posts
3475
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
7/18/2026 9:51pm
Again, I am sure you have some sort of proof they told sponsors it would be streamed for free??  No you don't, just more making shit...

Again, I am sure you have some sort of proof they told sponsors it would be streamed for free??  No you don't, just more making shit up. 

Buckland wrote:
You're right, sponsors pay for advertising without knowing how/who will be consuming it. No I don't have proof of the contract, but let's use a little...

You're right, sponsors pay for advertising without knowing how/who will be consuming it. No I don't have proof of the contract, but let's use a little bit of critical thinking here and use our imaginations on an internet discussion board. It wasn't being "streamed for free" at any point.

Has zero to do with critical thinking.  Racer TV took all those races to Flo, many of which are not MX Sports.  Mx Sports and the other promotors agreed meaning they thought it was the best choice for THEIR races.  Whether it is or not is yet to be seen. 

7
7/18/2026 11:52pm
$40 bucks a month huh? So unfortunate for people everywhere that like to watch. Would be really interesting to hear how many people actually sign up...

$40 bucks a month huh? So unfortunate for people everywhere that like to watch. Would be really interesting to hear how many people actually sign up to pay that. You think 1000 people will even do so? That's only 40k if even 1000 people were to do so. Minus all expenses and whatever percentage split is agreed upon. The Racer TV broadcast on Youtube was great and the proper way to broadcast the LL races. Now you just have to "FLO" out more money, and its even more expensive than Peacock at 9 to 12 bucks a month to watch all the Supercross and National races....bummer!  

(Im sure this post will make a difference 😁) 

Who are the 5 tards that down voted my question? 👎  

The Moth wrote:

I upvoted you bro. Man, are you going to get anymore ride fast die punk shirts?  Be cool to see a hoodie with that on it. 

Those shirts "Moto Jerks" > Ride Fast Die Punk are in stock in all sizes on our website. No plans on doing it on a hoodie...Cheers! 

1
Mx286
Posts
490
Joined
9/5/2011
Location
Owensboro, KY, USA
7/19/2026 5:34am

I guess they’re charging sales tax on everything now? Looked up admission pricing and it showed TN sales tax was applied. Never seen sales tax applied to a gate fee at a track before.

3
Tyler D
Posts
2369
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
La, CA, USA
7/19/2026 6:17am Edited Date/Time 7/19/2026 4:23pm
I never said it was out of their hands.  I said if Racer wanted to quit giving it away, the only option would be to pay...

I never said it was out of their hands.  I said if Racer wanted to quit giving it away, the only option would be to pay another broadcast team or start their own which would cost a fortune and makes no sense.  It's amazing how many complain when something was free for years, then it gets behind a paywall and everyone cries about it.  Nobody is forcing you to watch it.

Tyler D wrote:
its kind of a false dichotomy tho. there's paying to watch it and then there's paying 2.5x the cost of AppleTV (which now includes F1 btw..which...

its kind of a false dichotomy tho. there's paying to watch it and then there's paying 2.5x the cost of AppleTV (which now includes F1 btw..which used to be ~$90 a YEAR for f1 f2 f3) for a service with a known track record of piss poor production quality and borderline fraudulent business practices. 

he literally could have picked anybody besides flo and caught 20% of the flak hes catching now, but he probably picked them because of the lucrative (on paper) royalty structure. 

 He could have picked anybody?  Are there numerous broadcast companies that specialize in motorsports?  Nope, there are not.  That's why RACER productions exists.Are there multiple streaming...
  1.  He could have picked anybody?  Are there numerous broadcast companies that specialize in motorsports?  Nope, there are not.  That's why RACER productions exists.
  2. Are there multiple streaming platforms that would want to stream it?  Who knows?
  3. What if he did pick it because it was the most lucrative?  It's their business and they get the choice to do that, just like you have the choice to watch it. 

The entitlement is real.  MX Sports has zero responsibility to stream anything for free.  Tour de France is not free.  SX is not free.  Movies are not free.  Basically nothing is and that's what it takes to stay in business.

I hope SRAM starts charging you a subscription fee to access their preexisting electronic ecosystem. You can always switch to Shimano like the nerds. Just business.

It's not entitlement to voice dissatisfaction with a service. Again, you're conflating two positions; paying to access at all, and paying bozos F1tv money for state fair quality. 

Mx sports doesn't need to monetize coverage to stay in business. And the product itself is largely consumed by the participants, whom are already being fleeced progressively more every year. Supercross or f1 or movies are not analogous Products; this is (or was) a value add to the amateur national product; not THE product.  

Reading a 2013 racerX article it looks like tim cotter was tasked with monetizing racertv by selling production to other series and failed. Can't imagine why. 

3
rsd47
Posts
632
Joined
6/3/2019
Location
GB
7/19/2026 6:37am

If it's the same quality as the free streams from previous years, that's daylight robbery. The Loretta broadcast is awful, but gets away with it because it's free. I definitely won't be paying $40

7
mxracer816
Posts
1116
Joined
7/28/2011
Location
Atlanta, TX, USA
7/22/2026 3:20pm
rsd47 wrote:
If it's the same quality as the free streams from previous years, that's daylight robbery. The Loretta broadcast is awful, but gets away with it because...

If it's the same quality as the free streams from previous years, that's daylight robbery. The Loretta broadcast is awful, but gets away with it because it's free. I definitely won't be paying $40

I'm not here to argue with anyone, a business has all the rights to do what they think is best for the business. I think the point is that Mxsports already over charges for EVERYTHING at Loretta's. They are selling out all the kids and riders that would love to be able to go watch their motos from an event that they spent thousands of dollars to make and attend. Now they have to pay a monthly or yearly fee to be able to go rewatch. The only thing I would love to know, and I have a good idea of how many live viewers racerTV had on average every day in the past, is how many people actually sign up and pay to watch. I bet it is a small percentage of viewers in the past. Seems like a loss for what they gain. 

2
1
7/22/2026 3:34pm
Show me how you know this?  Who was paying Racer TV for the broadcast in prior years?  Do you think they just showed up as volunteers...

Show me how you know this?  Who was paying Racer TV for the broadcast in prior years?  Do you think they just showed up as volunteers to offer a stream for free?  Do you have any clue how much that costs?  My guess is Lucas Oil was absorbing the cost for that and others and decided to include a bunch of motorsports to Flo.  The racing added to Flo is much more than MX Sports events.....includes Mammoth (not MX Sports) Flat Track (not MX Sports) and Endurocross (not MX Sports).  I am not saying DC is perfect, but holy shit some of you don't know anything and just yell at the clouds.

I hope DC sees this and gives you a free subscription ❤️

You hv to show DC this 1st.  It’s from the 1st magazine. It was a newspaper like mag b4 being a magazine.  IMG 5855

3
gt80rider
Posts
7128
Joined
4/19/2008
Location
Boulder, CO, USA
7/22/2026 3:41pm
LoudLove wrote:
So basically everyone values live LL broadcast at $0 and want whoever is responsible for that broadcast to absorb the costs. You see where this is...

So basically everyone values live LL broadcast at $0 and want whoever is responsible for that broadcast to absorb the costs. You see where this is going, right?  What business venture would succeed by catering to a customer who’s not willing to pay for the service?

Yo LL... I got this bridge in Brooklyn for sale... top shelf, high end Bridge that I reallyyy don't wanna sell... but for you... I'll cut you a deal... 

U ain't smart bruh... lol... you sticking up for the epstein class like a good robot... do you realize how many millions they making off that race???? Do u realize how cheap it is to do video these days??? Geezus man... granted, I do enjoy watching you overclock da chit out of your last two brain cells... lmaoooo

4
motosx
Posts
8
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Fairfield, CA, USA
Fantasy
7/22/2026 4:13pm

if you have a superbox flosports is on there so free. 

7/23/2026 6:26am
My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to...

My bad.  It was sold last year but further explains it and extends it further away from MX Sports.  Also explains why they moved it to Flo.  The new ownership likely took over last year and then decided doing Loretta's for free was a terrible business decision.  Again, NOT decided by MX Sports and includes a full suite of stuff Racer TV broadcasts

 

https://racer.com/2025/03/27/mavtv-acquired-to-be-rebranded-racer

USA wrote:

Donny, you're out of your element 

huh?

The big Labowski

1
7/23/2026 12:34pm

This is a super bad idea for the race, now no one is going to watch it and never gonna know who the kid in b class that rode his heart out and you are a fan of the rest of there career, that is now gone. having a hard time to belive that they need that money. im sure they could have gotten more money from peolpe if it was free and you could donate money insted.

4
1
yak651
Posts
8783
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI, USA
Fantasy
7/23/2026 12:51pm
Mx286 wrote:
I guess they’re charging sales tax on everything now? Looked up admission pricing and it showed TN sales tax was applied. Never seen sales tax applied...

I guess they’re charging sales tax on everything now? Looked up admission pricing and it showed TN sales tax was applied. Never seen sales tax applied to a gate fee at a track before.

They probably only accept cash at the door also,  it sure why that would be 🤔

1
7/25/2026 7:23am

I don’t know him but seriously someone like Matty B walking around the track provides enjoyable to watch footage from all the races. 

FLO is horrible. Good luck trying to cancel after a month also. It’s designed for you not to. At least it was last time I wasted money on that service. 

Sponsors pay to be on a stream for exposure. Not much exposure because of the pay wall they will go else where. I would. 

2
1

Post a reply to: Will Loretta Lynns Be Shown Live On Racer TV?

The Latest