Trump says "Iran agreed to everything"

6/15/2026 11:32am
vet323 wrote:

This is 1946-2022. Israel averaged $4.18 billion/year.

Ukraine got $185 billion from 2021-2025. That's an average of $46.25 billion/year.

soggy wrote:
We really need to be be specific. We have sent Ukraine mostly weapons totaling whatever the current number is. This is good because it lets us...

We really need to be be specific. We have sent Ukraine mostly weapons totaling whatever the current number is. This is good because it lets us get rid of old weapons that we would have to pay to dispose of, and it provides work for defense contractors to produce more to replenish. 

vet323 wrote:
That is a myopic way to view it. We "got rid of" weapons that were older, sure. Those weapons were certainly still effective or Ukraine wouldn't have...

That is a myopic way to view it. 

We "got rid of" weapons that were older, sure. Those weapons were certainly still effective or Ukraine wouldn't have used them. Now that those weapons are gone, do you imagine that they will need to be replaced? Do you suppose US taxpayers will pay for that?

Yes, yes we will.

TM

2
SKlein
Posts
1479
Joined
3/25/2014
Location
MN, MN US
6/15/2026 11:35am
LoudLove wrote:

I was thinking more along the lines of the 100 school children killed due to old intel.  Pretty sure their families lost. 

There's that, and the service members who lost their lives during these operations. He specifically said "you" though. Unless TM would like to argue spiked gas prices were a net win, that's arguably been the biggest impact to people.

1
3
6/15/2026 11:48am Edited Date/Time 6/15/2026 11:49am
LoudLove wrote:

I was thinking more along the lines of the 100 school children killed due to old intel.  Pretty sure their families lost. 

SKlein wrote:
There's that, and the service members who lost their lives during these operations. He specifically said "you" though. Unless TM would like to argue spiked gas...

There's that, and the service members who lost their lives during these operations. He specifically said "you" though. Unless TM would like to argue spiked gas prices were a net win, that's arguably been the biggest impact to people.

I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace, I think most people will recover and by next year and be back to living normal. There are however some huge benefits that we on a daily basis will not recognize. IE: the dismantling of OPEC, Iran's ability to create terror in the region....... A lot of these things just don't affect our daily life that we are aware of. So beyond the higher energy costs and general cost of living, how did it individually affect @LoudLove ?

TM

6
lappedrider
Posts
1549
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Tooele, UT US
6/15/2026 11:56am

IMO, this is why President Trump pulled out of the JCPOA. Because he is essentially a petulant child.  I had hopes the folks around him would keep him on the tracks.  But we hat Hegseth and Steven Miller instead.  

 

3
2

The Shop

soggy
Posts
8825
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
UT US
6/15/2026 11:58am
vet323 wrote:

This is 1946-2022. Israel averaged $4.18 billion/year.

Ukraine got $185 billion from 2021-2025. That's an average of $46.25 billion/year.

soggy wrote:
We really need to be be specific. We have sent Ukraine mostly weapons totaling whatever the current number is. This is good because it lets us...

We really need to be be specific. We have sent Ukraine mostly weapons totaling whatever the current number is. This is good because it lets us get rid of old weapons that we would have to pay to dispose of, and it provides work for defense contractors to produce more to replenish. 

vet323 wrote:
That is a myopic way to view it. We "got rid of" weapons that were older, sure. Those weapons were certainly still effective or Ukraine wouldn't have...

That is a myopic way to view it. 

We "got rid of" weapons that were older, sure. Those weapons were certainly still effective or Ukraine wouldn't have used them. Now that those weapons are gone, do you imagine that they will need to be replaced? Do you suppose US taxpayers will pay for that?

Yes we do. But we are also putting that money back into the economy in the form of paying workers to replenish the coffers. 

1
4
olds cool
Posts
4198
Joined
1/17/2010
Location
Claremont, NC US
6/15/2026 12:07pm

If the City of London and the Bank of England / Lloyds of London criminals lose their financial grip on Iran, we all win whether you like the evil orange man or not.

1
3
matt.3150
Posts
737
Joined
3/20/2015
Location
San Jose, CA US
6/15/2026 12:12pm
Israel has benefited the most...

Israel has benefited the most...

image 3222.png?VersionId=qV
vet323 wrote:

This is 1946-2022. Israel averaged $4.18 billion/year.

Ukraine got $185 billion from 2021-2025. That's an average of $46.25 billion/year.

soggy wrote:
We really need to be be specific. We have sent Ukraine mostly weapons totaling whatever the current number is. This is good because it lets us...

We really need to be be specific. We have sent Ukraine mostly weapons totaling whatever the current number is. This is good because it lets us get rid of old weapons that we would have to pay to dispose of, and it provides work for defense contractors to produce more to replenish. 

Not to mention that the USA had an agreement with Ukraine, we would protect them if they gave Russia back it nukes. 
 

4
6
6/15/2026 12:14pm
olds cool wrote:
If the City of London and the Bank of England / Lloyds of London criminals lose their financial grip on Iran, we all win whether you...

If the City of London and the Bank of England / Lloyds of London criminals lose their financial grip on Iran, we all win whether you like the evil orange man or not.

You're not wrong, they used to get to decide who goes through the straight because they had a monopoly on who they gave insurance to. I'd say the real crime is us having to listen to all these foreigners (even locals) with "rumors" of the deal, and how "Israel dragged us into this", "Orange man bad". It would be more likely to believe that Trump said to himself "no other president was able to achieve peace in the middle east, I'm going to do it" Just to claim greatness, that I'd believe.

TM

1
10
mvd61
Posts
1250
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD US
6/15/2026 12:16pm
Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu.   If Trump was the master negotiator that he claims, there would never have been...

Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu.   If Trump was the master negotiator that he claims, there would never have been any bombs dropped and he would have seen through the BS Netanyahu was telling him. 

 

 Anybody that's saying the Obama deal was crap, and thinks that this current deal as it is rumored to be structured is better , is either delusional , just a hypocrite  or   from Israel .  

 

Iran is saying they are getting around the same amount of funds unfrozen as the Obama deal, and that is just to get them to start negotiations on  the thing that was the main reason for going over and bombing them.  Even if Trump can work out something similar to what Obama had gotten done,  the price paid by the US will be much higher . The  taxpayers money that has already been spent is much more than the Obama deal cost in actual  taxpayers  money.

 

I would love to hear how and why this rumored deal is better than the one that Trump pulled the US out of.  I really don't understand why he didn't just try and renegotiate it from the start instead of pulling out.  How did it help the US to pull out of the agreement? Did the sanctions the US put back on Iran help US based businesses ?   It seemed to me Trump just wanted to undo anything that was tied to Obama. And it was more of an ego move , than one that helped the US.  

 

I expect to see  replies saying that I must just have TDS , that I'm some libtard, that I just don't understand , etc. 

 One of those things is true, I really don't understand how it benefited the US to pull out, and how we are better off right now than we were before the strikes started. The uranium is still right where it was last year buried .  I really do hope that somebody can explain to me how we are better off now than before. And how the US was better off pulling out of an agreement without trying to renegotiate the one that was in effect?

 

I get it I'm stuck on what shouldn't have been done. But how does not talking about how what has been done has only hurt the US a better way of looking at it? Shouldn't we learn from mistakes and hold leaders accountable for them? Or is that just for people not named Trump.

 

But really at this point, I'm glad  it looks like there is a path to it being over. And that is better than being at war. Not better than never having gone to war, but at this point its clear we are not dealing with leaders who have the best interests of the US on their minds when they act. So an end to the war and lower oil prices will be better than that not happening. 

 

ToolMaker wrote:

"Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu."

Same old broken record story.🥱 Got anything new?

TM

 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our main source of intel in the Middle East. Has it ever dawned on you that maybe, just maybe, that intel was pure shit? Use your captain crunch decoder and explain to us how bibi has not played trump. I’d love to hear that explanation TM. Trump sure has benefited from the markets though. Don’t hear much bitching about that. Yet there’s plenty(including myself) that can’t stand the thought of Pelosi and others insider trading. 

4
3
6/15/2026 12:20pm Edited Date/Time 6/15/2026 12:29pm
Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu.   If Trump was the master negotiator that he claims, there would never have been...

Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu.   If Trump was the master negotiator that he claims, there would never have been any bombs dropped and he would have seen through the BS Netanyahu was telling him. 

 

 Anybody that's saying the Obama deal was crap, and thinks that this current deal as it is rumored to be structured is better , is either delusional , just a hypocrite  or   from Israel .  

 

Iran is saying they are getting around the same amount of funds unfrozen as the Obama deal, and that is just to get them to start negotiations on  the thing that was the main reason for going over and bombing them.  Even if Trump can work out something similar to what Obama had gotten done,  the price paid by the US will be much higher . The  taxpayers money that has already been spent is much more than the Obama deal cost in actual  taxpayers  money.

 

I would love to hear how and why this rumored deal is better than the one that Trump pulled the US out of.  I really don't understand why he didn't just try and renegotiate it from the start instead of pulling out.  How did it help the US to pull out of the agreement? Did the sanctions the US put back on Iran help US based businesses ?   It seemed to me Trump just wanted to undo anything that was tied to Obama. And it was more of an ego move , than one that helped the US.  

 

I expect to see  replies saying that I must just have TDS , that I'm some libtard, that I just don't understand , etc. 

 One of those things is true, I really don't understand how it benefited the US to pull out, and how we are better off right now than we were before the strikes started. The uranium is still right where it was last year buried .  I really do hope that somebody can explain to me how we are better off now than before. And how the US was better off pulling out of an agreement without trying to renegotiate the one that was in effect?

 

I get it I'm stuck on what shouldn't have been done. But how does not talking about how what has been done has only hurt the US a better way of looking at it? Shouldn't we learn from mistakes and hold leaders accountable for them? Or is that just for people not named Trump.

 

But really at this point, I'm glad  it looks like there is a path to it being over. And that is better than being at war. Not better than never having gone to war, but at this point its clear we are not dealing with leaders who have the best interests of the US on their minds when they act. So an end to the war and lower oil prices will be better than that not happening. 

 

ToolMaker wrote:

"Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu."

Same old broken record story.🥱 Got anything new?

TM

Not really, before I was saying that Trump didn't see he was played by him. Now he can see that he's been talked into a war he likely never wanted to be a part of. 

 

As long as the deal isn't blow up by  Netanyahu  after the US unfreezes the assets .  That would never happen though right?  So far the deal they have will still not get us back to before the strikes started. But I'm glad that it appears that there will be an end to  it. 

 

Oops hit post a little early........  I heard there is a med for that. 

 

 I still think we would have been better off negotiating instead of dropping bombs.   Iran now knows what the worst case is and that they can handle it. Other than genocide , the stick part has now been played. If the Iranian military is totally wiped out like Trump claims, Than Iran has already experienced the worst case scenario . And it seems silly to think that making threats would have much impact on negotiations in the future. Making me think that they likely had a negative impact on the negotiations that are going on right now.   

1
3
avidchimp
Posts
5765
Joined
7/9/2008
Location
EGL, MN US
6/15/2026 12:57pm Edited Date/Time 6/15/2026 12:58pm
Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu.   If Trump was the master negotiator that he claims, there would never have been...

Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu.   If Trump was the master negotiator that he claims, there would never have been any bombs dropped and he would have seen through the BS Netanyahu was telling him. 

 

 Anybody that's saying the Obama deal was crap, and thinks that this current deal as it is rumored to be structured is better , is either delusional , just a hypocrite  or   from Israel .  

 

Iran is saying they are getting around the same amount of funds unfrozen as the Obama deal, and that is just to get them to start negotiations on  the thing that was the main reason for going over and bombing them.  Even if Trump can work out something similar to what Obama had gotten done,  the price paid by the US will be much higher . The  taxpayers money that has already been spent is much more than the Obama deal cost in actual  taxpayers  money.

 

I would love to hear how and why this rumored deal is better than the one that Trump pulled the US out of.  I really don't understand why he didn't just try and renegotiate it from the start instead of pulling out.  How did it help the US to pull out of the agreement? Did the sanctions the US put back on Iran help US based businesses ?   It seemed to me Trump just wanted to undo anything that was tied to Obama. And it was more of an ego move , than one that helped the US.  

 

I expect to see  replies saying that I must just have TDS , that I'm some libtard, that I just don't understand , etc. 

 One of those things is true, I really don't understand how it benefited the US to pull out, and how we are better off right now than we were before the strikes started. The uranium is still right where it was last year buried .  I really do hope that somebody can explain to me how we are better off now than before. And how the US was better off pulling out of an agreement without trying to renegotiate the one that was in effect?

 

I get it I'm stuck on what shouldn't have been done. But how does not talking about how what has been done has only hurt the US a better way of looking at it? Shouldn't we learn from mistakes and hold leaders accountable for them? Or is that just for people not named Trump.

 

But really at this point, I'm glad  it looks like there is a path to it being over. And that is better than being at war. Not better than never having gone to war, but at this point its clear we are not dealing with leaders who have the best interests of the US on their minds when they act. So an end to the war and lower oil prices will be better than that not happening. 

 

ToolMaker wrote:

"Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu."

Same old broken record story.🥱 Got anything new?

TM

mvd61 wrote:
 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our...

 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our main source of intel in the Middle East. Has it ever dawned on you that maybe, just maybe, that intel was pure shit? Use your captain crunch decoder and explain to us how bibi has not played trump. I’d love to hear that explanation TM. Trump sure has benefited from the markets though. Don’t hear much bitching about that. Yet there’s plenty(including myself) that can’t stand the thought of Pelosi and others insider trading. 

I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves office. Surely nothing swampy to see there.

9
1
mvd61
Posts
1250
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD US
6/15/2026 1:04pm
ToolMaker wrote:

"Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu."

Same old broken record story.🥱 Got anything new?

TM

mvd61 wrote:
 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our...

 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our main source of intel in the Middle East. Has it ever dawned on you that maybe, just maybe, that intel was pure shit? Use your captain crunch decoder and explain to us how bibi has not played trump. I’d love to hear that explanation TM. Trump sure has benefited from the markets though. Don’t hear much bitching about that. Yet there’s plenty(including myself) that can’t stand the thought of Pelosi and others insider trading. 

avidchimp wrote:
I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves...

I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves office. Surely nothing swampy to see there.

Holy shit, he keeps it after leaving office? 

3
3
avidchimp
Posts
5765
Joined
7/9/2008
Location
EGL, MN US
6/15/2026 1:06pm
mvd61 wrote:
 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our...

 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our main source of intel in the Middle East. Has it ever dawned on you that maybe, just maybe, that intel was pure shit? Use your captain crunch decoder and explain to us how bibi has not played trump. I’d love to hear that explanation TM. Trump sure has benefited from the markets though. Don’t hear much bitching about that. Yet there’s plenty(including myself) that can’t stand the thought of Pelosi and others insider trading. 

avidchimp wrote:
I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves...

I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves office. Surely nothing swampy to see there.

mvd61 wrote:

Holy shit, he keeps it after leaving office? 

Yes Sir.

2
2
6/15/2026 1:20pm
ToolMaker wrote:

"Well at least Trump can see he was played by Netanyahu."

Same old broken record story.🥱 Got anything new?

TM

mvd61 wrote:
 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our...

 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our main source of intel in the Middle East. Has it ever dawned on you that maybe, just maybe, that intel was pure shit? Use your captain crunch decoder and explain to us how bibi has not played trump. I’d love to hear that explanation TM. Trump sure has benefited from the markets though. Don’t hear much bitching about that. Yet there’s plenty(including myself) that can’t stand the thought of Pelosi and others insider trading. 

avidchimp wrote:
I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves...

I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves office. Surely nothing swampy to see there.

And why Boeing has dragged their feet for so long with the 2 on order that we even need a bridge AF1?

Excellent question Avid!

9
6/15/2026 1:22pm
mvd61 wrote:
 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our...

 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our main source of intel in the Middle East. Has it ever dawned on you that maybe, just maybe, that intel was pure shit? Use your captain crunch decoder and explain to us how bibi has not played trump. I’d love to hear that explanation TM. Trump sure has benefited from the markets though. Don’t hear much bitching about that. Yet there’s plenty(including myself) that can’t stand the thought of Pelosi and others insider trading. 

avidchimp wrote:
I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves...

I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves office. Surely nothing swampy to see there.

mvd61 wrote:

Holy shit, he keeps it after leaving office? 

Yes and no, it's going on display in his presidential library. 

TM

1
6
borg
Posts
6742
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
6/15/2026 1:27pm
matt.3150 wrote:
So yes, there is a deal—but it’s really just a deal to negotiate a future deal on Iranian uranium enrichment.So where are we now? Arguably not...

So yes, there is a deal—but it’s really just a deal to negotiate a future deal on Iranian uranium enrichment.

So where are we now? Arguably not even back to where we were before the conflict. We’ve had lives lost, including 14 U.S. service members, damage to military bases, depleted weapons stockpiles, and economic impacts affecting both the U.S. and the world. Gas prices may take time to stabilize, and we’ll see additional effects when planting season arrives.

What Iran has demonstrated is that it can impose costs on the United States and that it retains the ability to threaten shipping through the Strait of Hormuz whenever tensions escalate.

And are our Gulf allies happy with the outcome? Israel certainly doesn’t appear to be. As long as fighting and cross-border operations continue in Lebanon, a lasting agreement with Iran will be difficult to achieve.

For Trump supporters, it’s worth recognizing that Trump appeared eager to move on from the issue. To use one of his own favorite phrases, it looked like he “didn’t have the cards.”

Whether you agree with that assessment or not, it’s hard to argue that this outcome represents a clear strategic victory after all the costs that were incurred.


 

Mostly agree. Trump was getting desperate to get out of this mess. The mess that he started. Returning to pre war oil flow will not be happening right away when you realize that the halt in shipping was mostly self imposed by the mariners. It was because of fear. That has not gone away. Keep an eye on war risk premiums. That indicates the fear level because the ship owners and operators self insure. This is a good source to keep up with what is actually happening with the shipping situation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xosw8iFTzsc&t=32s

4
2
avidchimp
Posts
5765
Joined
7/9/2008
Location
EGL, MN US
6/15/2026 1:33pm

Boeing is definitely dragging it's feet due to a couple different reasons, biggest one being workforce with clearance to actually do the work, and the intricate nature of what's being asked of them technically, most electronic integration.

Neither here nor there, it's one hell of a gift from one M.E. country to a sitting president. Also, who says we need a "bridge" AF1? Are the current ones falling apart and ready for the desert or something?

2
2
LoudLove
Posts
2846
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
US
6/15/2026 1:42pm
LoudLove wrote:

I was thinking more along the lines of the 100 school children killed due to old intel.  Pretty sure their families lost. 

SKlein wrote:
There's that, and the service members who lost their lives during these operations. He specifically said "you" though. Unless TM would like to argue spiked gas...

There's that, and the service members who lost their lives during these operations. He specifically said "you" though. Unless TM would like to argue spiked gas prices were a net win, that's arguably been the biggest impact to people.

ToolMaker wrote:
I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace...

I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace, I think most people will recover and by next year and be back to living normal. There are however some huge benefits that we on a daily basis will not recognize. IE: the dismantling of OPEC, Iran's ability to create terror in the region....... A lot of these things just don't affect our daily life that we are aware of. So beyond the higher energy costs and general cost of living, how did it individually affect @LoudLove ?

TM

Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach in my 4Runner 2-3 days a week and living large!  

But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. 

5
3
JerryVan
Posts
149
Joined
5/18/2023
Location
Carlisle, WA AU
6/15/2026 2:18pm

Well now that the Iran issue is done, they can finally get back to releasing the unredacted Epstein Files 🙂

15
3
mvd61
Posts
1250
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD US
6/15/2026 3:34pm
JerryVan wrote:

Well now that the Iran issue is done, they can finally get back to releasing the unredacted Epstein Files 🙂

Only 176 or so days past their own deadline. 

5
5
LoudLove
Posts
2846
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
US
6/15/2026 4:35pm
JerryVan wrote:

Well now that the Iran issue is done, they can finally get back to releasing the unredacted Epstein Files 🙂

Epstein is much less relevant than the Iranian conflict. Straits remain blocked, and even after reopening, transit costs will skyrocket. Signatures are pending, so Trump’s victory chants are a bit premature. 

1
7
6/15/2026 4:40pm Edited Date/Time 6/15/2026 4:40pm
SKlein wrote:
There's that, and the service members who lost their lives during these operations. He specifically said "you" though. Unless TM would like to argue spiked gas...

There's that, and the service members who lost their lives during these operations. He specifically said "you" though. Unless TM would like to argue spiked gas prices were a net win, that's arguably been the biggest impact to people.

ToolMaker wrote:
I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace...

I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace, I think most people will recover and by next year and be back to living normal. There are however some huge benefits that we on a daily basis will not recognize. IE: the dismantling of OPEC, Iran's ability to create terror in the region....... A lot of these things just don't affect our daily life that we are aware of. So beyond the higher energy costs and general cost of living, how did it individually affect @LoudLove ?

TM

LoudLove wrote:
Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach...

Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach in my 4Runner 2-3 days a week and living large!  

But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. 

"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. "

In the words of  respected member "I honestly have no idea what you're talking about"

I pretty much thought it was brilliant. Bomb the bejuzes out of them and then just sit there and wait till they realize there's nothing they can do. Sure, it didn't happen over night. But here we are on the verge of peace through the ME. That aside, if you think your position is "our equipment didn't work" you should be thankful you/we found out now vs when it's really necessary. IF they didn't in fact work, you can revamp them. It's a great testing ground. What exactly do you mean "not finish the campaign"? you're of the mindset that we needed to keep bombing them? Why? Because that's what we've always done? This strategy brought the ME together against Iran. IF there was "no strategy to end the war" why exactly do you think it's over? This was over a long f#@%ing time ago, it just took time to play out. Everyone is so used to instant results they have no patience anymore.

Your turn,

TM

2
16
matt.3150
Posts
737
Joined
3/20/2015
Location
San Jose, CA US
6/15/2026 5:15pm
ToolMaker wrote:
I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace...

I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace, I think most people will recover and by next year and be back to living normal. There are however some huge benefits that we on a daily basis will not recognize. IE: the dismantling of OPEC, Iran's ability to create terror in the region....... A lot of these things just don't affect our daily life that we are aware of. So beyond the higher energy costs and general cost of living, how did it individually affect @LoudLove ?

TM

LoudLove wrote:
Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach...

Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach in my 4Runner 2-3 days a week and living large!  

But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. 

ToolMaker wrote:
"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to...

"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. "

In the words of  respected member "I honestly have no idea what you're talking about"

I pretty much thought it was brilliant. Bomb the bejuzes out of them and then just sit there and wait till they realize there's nothing they can do. Sure, it didn't happen over night. But here we are on the verge of peace through the ME. That aside, if you think your position is "our equipment didn't work" you should be thankful you/we found out now vs when it's really necessary. IF they didn't in fact work, you can revamp them. It's a great testing ground. What exactly do you mean "not finish the campaign"? you're of the mindset that we needed to keep bombing them? Why? Because that's what we've always done? This strategy brought the ME together against Iran. IF there was "no strategy to end the war" why exactly do you think it's over? This was over a long f#@%ing time ago, it just took time to play out. Everyone is so used to instant results they have no patience anymore.

Your turn,

TM

🤦

9
5
M8
Posts
145
Joined
11/13/2020
Location
OG AU
6/15/2026 5:22pm
ToolMaker wrote:
I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace...

I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace, I think most people will recover and by next year and be back to living normal. There are however some huge benefits that we on a daily basis will not recognize. IE: the dismantling of OPEC, Iran's ability to create terror in the region....... A lot of these things just don't affect our daily life that we are aware of. So beyond the higher energy costs and general cost of living, how did it individually affect @LoudLove ?

TM

LoudLove wrote:
Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach...

Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach in my 4Runner 2-3 days a week and living large!  

But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. 

ToolMaker wrote:
"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to...

"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. "

In the words of  respected member "I honestly have no idea what you're talking about"

I pretty much thought it was brilliant. Bomb the bejuzes out of them and then just sit there and wait till they realize there's nothing they can do. Sure, it didn't happen over night. But here we are on the verge of peace through the ME. That aside, if you think your position is "our equipment didn't work" you should be thankful you/we found out now vs when it's really necessary. IF they didn't in fact work, you can revamp them. It's a great testing ground. What exactly do you mean "not finish the campaign"? you're of the mindset that we needed to keep bombing them? Why? Because that's what we've always done? This strategy brought the ME together against Iran. IF there was "no strategy to end the war" why exactly do you think it's over? This was over a long f#@%ing time ago, it just took time to play out. Everyone is so used to instant results they have no patience anymore.

Your turn,

TM

The cope is strong with this one.

10
5
6/15/2026 5:33pm
ToolMaker wrote:

Hmm, looks like more people are realizing the war is over. Some people just take a bit longer to figure it out.

TM

So who won?

ToolMaker wrote:
Your ability to comprehend is beyond my ability to explain. But let's have a go at it, "the countries of the world". Even you and the...

Your ability to comprehend is beyond my ability to explain. But let's have a go at it, "the countries of the world". Even you and the rest of the Trump haters won.

TM

I'll make it easier for you to explain...

  1. USA
  2. Israel
  3. Iran

Pick a number, which country won?

1
5
6/15/2026 5:42pm
mvd61 wrote:
 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our...

 Our most greatest bestest ally that blasted the shit out of the USS Liberty and helped coax our government into plenty of wars has been our main source of intel in the Middle East. Has it ever dawned on you that maybe, just maybe, that intel was pure shit? Use your captain crunch decoder and explain to us how bibi has not played trump. I’d love to hear that explanation TM. Trump sure has benefited from the markets though. Don’t hear much bitching about that. Yet there’s plenty(including myself) that can’t stand the thought of Pelosi and others insider trading. 

avidchimp wrote:
I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves...

I'm still wondering who is footing the reported one billion dollar retrofit bill for the 747 that Qatar gave him, that he keeps when he leaves office. Surely nothing swampy to see there.

mvd61 wrote:

Holy shit, he keeps it after leaving office? 

He's not leaving office.

2
4
6/15/2026 6:15pm
ToolMaker wrote:
I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace...

I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace, I think most people will recover and by next year and be back to living normal. There are however some huge benefits that we on a daily basis will not recognize. IE: the dismantling of OPEC, Iran's ability to create terror in the region....... A lot of these things just don't affect our daily life that we are aware of. So beyond the higher energy costs and general cost of living, how did it individually affect @LoudLove ?

TM

LoudLove wrote:
Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach...

Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach in my 4Runner 2-3 days a week and living large!  

But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. 

ToolMaker wrote:
"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to...

"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. "

In the words of  respected member "I honestly have no idea what you're talking about"

I pretty much thought it was brilliant. Bomb the bejuzes out of them and then just sit there and wait till they realize there's nothing they can do. Sure, it didn't happen over night. But here we are on the verge of peace through the ME. That aside, if you think your position is "our equipment didn't work" you should be thankful you/we found out now vs when it's really necessary. IF they didn't in fact work, you can revamp them. It's a great testing ground. What exactly do you mean "not finish the campaign"? you're of the mindset that we needed to keep bombing them? Why? Because that's what we've always done? This strategy brought the ME together against Iran. IF there was "no strategy to end the war" why exactly do you think it's over? This was over a long f#@%ing time ago, it just took time to play out. Everyone is so used to instant results they have no patience anymore.

Your turn,

TM

"Bomb the bejuzes out of them and then just sit there and wait till they realize there's nothing they can do."

Do you think closing Hormuz Strait was nothing?

"This strategy brought the ME together against Iran."

Did it?

"IF there was "no strategy to end the war" why exactly do you think it's over?"

Trump had no winning cards, so he capitulated.

7
9
Kenny Banyan
Posts
3977
Joined
6/2/2024
Location
Seattle, WA US
6/15/2026 6:16pm
ToolMaker wrote:
I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace...

I stipulate that we all had higher energy prices which led to higher living cost for several months. However, in the big picture for future peace, I think most people will recover and by next year and be back to living normal. There are however some huge benefits that we on a daily basis will not recognize. IE: the dismantling of OPEC, Iran's ability to create terror in the region....... A lot of these things just don't affect our daily life that we are aware of. So beyond the higher energy costs and general cost of living, how did it individually affect @LoudLove ?

TM

LoudLove wrote:
Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach...

Me?  As in the here and now?  Not a bit of if I look at life through a straw with blinders on. I’m at the beach in my 4Runner 2-3 days a week and living large!  

But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. 

ToolMaker wrote:
"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to...

"But if we’re talking “security”, that’s a long term mixed bag. Iran made the US look unprepared at best, and unwilling to see the fight to the end at worst. We couldn’t finish a campaign we started, and were consistently thwarted by primitive weaponry.  Our high-tech gadgetry works great against other high tech gadgetry but has weaknesses when facing slower but smaller opponents. Iran’s counter-offensives were noted globally, and while Trump and his supporters may shout “Winning!”, objectively the outcome weakened the US on the global stage. "

In the words of  respected member "I honestly have no idea what you're talking about"

I pretty much thought it was brilliant. Bomb the bejuzes out of them and then just sit there and wait till they realize there's nothing they can do. Sure, it didn't happen over night. But here we are on the verge of peace through the ME. That aside, if you think your position is "our equipment didn't work" you should be thankful you/we found out now vs when it's really necessary. IF they didn't in fact work, you can revamp them. It's a great testing ground. What exactly do you mean "not finish the campaign"? you're of the mindset that we needed to keep bombing them? Why? Because that's what we've always done? This strategy brought the ME together against Iran. IF there was "no strategy to end the war" why exactly do you think it's over? This was over a long f#@%ing time ago, it just took time to play out. Everyone is so used to instant results they have no patience anymore.

Your turn,

TM

I find it laughable that anyone would say the USA’s military equipment didn’t work. 😆

3
2
Dudley
Posts
522
Joined
9/10/2012
Location
Denver, CO US
6/15/2026 6:52pm

Make no mistake, our men and women could have destroyed Iran. The bitch about war, is a quick campaign results in mass casualties. What we learned since Vietnam is the regime change doesn’t work unless the people support it or were willing to go scorched earth. It’s damn clear Iranians don’t support it because all their leaders were taken out in one strike. I don’t want to see another news story about how Iranians want a better life. 

Back on topic, isreal intel is top notch but they have a tendency to exaggerate or Iran would have had a nuke in the 90’s. Was it real this time? We’ll never know.

Iran got us by the balls in this one. Trump is not willing to commit our forces to another Afghanistan and I don’t blame him. Peace deal is best we can hope for. Time will tell if it works. Should we have stayed the course with Obama deal, I suspect the truth will never come out just finger pointing. 

I say, let’s come home and focus on that 40 trillion dollar deficit. 

4
5
JerryVan
Posts
149
Joined
5/18/2023
Location
Carlisle, WA AU
6/15/2026 10:02pm

Goodnight to my American cousins, may your tax dollars be well used

IMG 6987 1.jpeg?VersionId=
14
6

Post a reply to: Trump says "Iran agreed to everything"

The Latest