The tree at Loretta’s, WTF??

7/30/2025 6:53am
JBlain619 wrote:
1. It's not a high speed jump.2. It's been there for 40+ years and no one has hit it before.  3. Go look at the video...

1. It's not a high speed jump.

2. It's been there for 40+ years and no one has hit it before.  

3. Go look at the video again, his back end starts to slide out and it shoots him back inside towards the tree.  You can see that exact thing if you watch the moto on Racertv.  It happens on the first lap and he's in 2nd going into that section. 

Not saying that it is his fault, just sometimes shit happens.

 

matze wrote:
That second argument is so weak"No one ever got hurt doing this before, so it must be safe."That doesn't hold up in risk assessment or any...

That second argument is so weak
"No one ever got hurt doing this before, so it must be safe."

That doesn't hold up in risk assessment or any safety discussions.

"I havent worn a seatbelt in 40 years and nothing's ever happened to me, so there's no need for one." lmao

I agree it’s a weak excuse and needs to be attended to but let’s not act like this was some crazy dangerous thing. It was a freak accident. Let’s not burn mx sports at the stake over it. Sometimes shit happens and playing armchair quarterback after the fact is easy. 

7
16
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
7/30/2025 6:57am
wicksy85 wrote:
Its wild the variance in track inspections on what passes and what doesnt, trees that close to thr tracks in Australia dont pass, well unless your...

Its wild the variance in track inspections on what passes and what doesnt, trees that close to thr tracks in Australia dont pass, well unless your paying the inspector money under the table anyways.

aees wrote:

From what i know there isn't track audits on AMA sanctioned events or tracks.

wicksy85 wrote:

Holy thats wild in my eyes, motorcycling australia have fits over so many things, the tracks are mini bike tracks in Australia 

There is both track building guidelines, rules and mandatory track inspections in most developed Mx countries by now 😅

Thats why I have a hard time accepting the bitching about when tracks or promotors get sued. If they can't care for track security themselves, what did I they think was going to happen?

That track, and there are more places, wouldnt pass any security audit I know of. There is a minimum 7 foot clearance around most obstacles, to start with.

So tragic it results in serious injuries because of neglect. That could easily have been a broken neck and end of his life.

6
11
7/30/2025 7:02am
JBlain619 wrote:
1. It's not a high speed jump.2. It's been there for 40+ years and no one has hit it before.  3. Go look at the video...

1. It's not a high speed jump.

2. It's been there for 40+ years and no one has hit it before.  

3. Go look at the video again, his back end starts to slide out and it shoots him back inside towards the tree.  You can see that exact thing if you watch the moto on Racertv.  It happens on the first lap and he's in 2nd going into that section. 

Not saying that it is his fault, just sometimes shit happens.

 

yak651 wrote:
Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse...

Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse outcome.

aees wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. Another thing...

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/

It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.

He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. 

Another thing that would and should never have passed a track security audit since you don't follow basic track design rules.

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. 

Should probably clear cut Washougal now as well for safety, 


Not just directed at you, but it is a bit interesting the amount of comments saying the tree shouldn’t be there and you shouldn’t hit a tree if you make a mistake, etc, but a majority of the same folks say a 60’ cliff on the back side of a berm is fine and it’s the riders responsibility to not make the mistake or choose not not ride. I get the related lawsuit skews the opinions, and I am not saying I agree with sueing, but I don’t see how the scenarios are any different, yet they garner a different reaction. 

 

8
8
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
7/30/2025 7:06am
yak651 wrote:
Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse...

Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse outcome.

aees wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. Another thing...

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/

It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.

He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. 

Another thing that would and should never have passed a track security audit since you don't follow basic track design rules.

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. Should probably clear cut...

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. 

Should probably clear cut Washougal now as well for safety, 


Not just directed at you, but it is a bit interesting the amount of comments saying the tree shouldn’t be there and you shouldn’t hit a tree if you make a mistake, etc, but a majority of the same folks say a 60’ cliff on the back side of a berm is fine and it’s the riders responsibility to not make the mistake or choose not not ride. I get the related lawsuit skews the opinions, and I am not saying I agree with sueing, but I don’t see how the scenarios are any different, yet they garner a different reaction. 

 

No person with experience from building safe tracks would say that (such) drop does not require fencing on top of berm.

4
3

The Shop

yak651
Posts
8554
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI US
Fantasy
7/30/2025 7:16am
yak651 wrote:
Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse...

Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse outcome.

aees wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. Another thing...

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/

It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.

He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. 

Another thing that would and should never have passed a track security audit since you don't follow basic track design rules.

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. Should probably clear cut...

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. 

Should probably clear cut Washougal now as well for safety, 


Not just directed at you, but it is a bit interesting the amount of comments saying the tree shouldn’t be there and you shouldn’t hit a tree if you make a mistake, etc, but a majority of the same folks say a 60’ cliff on the back side of a berm is fine and it’s the riders responsibility to not make the mistake or choose not not ride. I get the related lawsuit skews the opinions, and I am not saying I agree with sueing, but I don’t see how the scenarios are any different, yet they garner a different reaction. 

 

lol 60’ cliff. Come on Rich you don’t need to keep making the berm your kid whiskied off of taller and taller!

3
7
7/30/2025 7:28am Edited Date/Time 7/30/2025 7:40am
aees wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. Another thing...

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/

It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.

He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. 

Another thing that would and should never have passed a track security audit since you don't follow basic track design rules.

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. Should probably clear cut...

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. 

Should probably clear cut Washougal now as well for safety, 


Not just directed at you, but it is a bit interesting the amount of comments saying the tree shouldn’t be there and you shouldn’t hit a tree if you make a mistake, etc, but a majority of the same folks say a 60’ cliff on the back side of a berm is fine and it’s the riders responsibility to not make the mistake or choose not not ride. I get the related lawsuit skews the opinions, and I am not saying I agree with sueing, but I don’t see how the scenarios are any different, yet they garner a different reaction. 

 

yak651 wrote:

lol 60’ cliff. Come on Rich you don’t need to keep making the berm your kid whiskied off of taller and taller!

lol, ok, 40? 30? 10? What ever the number is, doesn’t change that it’s no different then a tree off the side of the track, but the comments from most are the exact opposite. LACR=riders fault, Loretta’s=tracks fault. Explain the difference? 


Edit, looked at the thread with Rich’s statement, he said 30’, my mistake. 

5
2
7/30/2025 7:34am

I think banning stacyc bikes from the pits will remedy this

13
3
7/30/2025 7:35am

      Didn’t Scotty Sheak ( RIP ) hit a tree branch at Southwick one year ?  It seems to me that he got knocked out cold. Scary as hell.

4
1
Nairb#70
Posts
3559
Joined
2/25/2020
Location
Ivoryton, CT US
7/30/2025 7:59am
      Didn’t Scotty Sheak ( RIP ) hit a tree branch at Southwick one year ?  It seems to me that he got knocked...

      Didn’t Scotty Sheak ( RIP ) hit a tree branch at Southwick one year ?  It seems to me that he got knocked out cold. Scary as hell.

I was witness to that, he dropped like a sack of potatoes. RIP Scott.

2
7/30/2025 8:10am

had a friend pass away at age 16 (when I was about 12) by hitting a tree similar to this.

You think DC will now ban the guy that took the video for showing "the sport in a negative light"? 

8
12
Johnny Ringo
Posts
7891
Joined
1/11/2016
Location
Tombstone, AZ US
7/30/2025 8:13am

Are we allowed to criticize DC/MX Sports without being accused of aligning with Cooksey? Can we carve out a space for that?

24
3
Racerx930
Posts
773
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Stillwater, OK US
7/30/2025 8:16am Edited Date/Time 7/30/2025 8:16am

I think banning stacyc bikes from the pits will remedy this

I run a fairly large motocross series.  The worst thing that has happened all year is a Stacyc collision with a rider coming off the track.  The child was out cold for several minutes and a very scary situation.   Time and place, and running around the pits of a busy race track isn't the time or place.

17
mxbrian15
Posts
591
Joined
12/8/2015
Location
Orlando, FL US
7/30/2025 8:25am
aeffertz wrote:

I don’t know what that dude was thinking. 

You dont know what the dude was thinking? Theres a tree right next to a high speed jump on a mx track 

JBlain619 wrote:
1. It's not a high speed jump.2. It's been there for 40+ years and no one has hit it before.  3. Go look at the video...

1. It's not a high speed jump.

2. It's been there for 40+ years and no one has hit it before.  

3. Go look at the video again, his back end starts to slide out and it shoots him back inside towards the tree.  You can see that exact thing if you watch the moto on Racertv.  It happens on the first lap and he's in 2nd going into that section. 

Not saying that it is his fault, just sometimes shit happens.

 

Not true. People have hit that tree before. This has just been the worst accident (that I know of).

1
Falcon
Posts
12172
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA US
7/30/2025 8:45am Edited Date/Time 7/30/2025 8:55am
had a friend pass away at age 16 (when I was about 12) by hitting a tree similar to this.You think DC will now ban the...

had a friend pass away at age 16 (when I was about 12) by hitting a tree similar to this.

You think DC will now ban the guy that took the video for showing "the sport in a negative light"? 

I saw a video on my feed this morning which seems to show exactly that. Dude is filming and gets "served" by the representative at the track and asked to leave. I'll see if I can find it. 

EDIT: (It may also be that the dude's credentials were not in order, but he presented the video as if he was getting kicked out because he showed the crash.)

5
1
7/30/2025 9:07am
had a friend pass away at age 16 (when I was about 12) by hitting a tree similar to this.You think DC will now ban the...

had a friend pass away at age 16 (when I was about 12) by hitting a tree similar to this.

You think DC will now ban the guy that took the video for showing "the sport in a negative light"? 

Falcon wrote:
I saw a video on my feed this morning which seems to show exactly that. Dude is filming and gets "served" by the representative at the...

I saw a video on my feed this morning which seems to show exactly that. Dude is filming and gets "served" by the representative at the track and asked to leave. I'll see if I can find it. 

EDIT: (It may also be that the dude's credentials were not in order, but he presented the video as if he was getting kicked out because he showed the crash.)

yeah it's the "Slowie" thread. Thus my comment. If you don't kiss DC's ring, you're out. 

2
4
peelout
Posts
18334
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT US
7/30/2025 9:10am

someone get Rich Taylor on the courtesy phone ASAP!

12
1
HondaSM
Posts
76
Joined
7/17/2024
Location
ringgold, GA US
7/30/2025 9:11am

I can't wrap my head around the mentality of "he made a mistake and hit the tree" or "shit happens". These dudes are racing at the highest amateur level. Of course shit happens. That's why the tree shouldn't be there to begin with. Until promoters get into the routine of making tracks safe FOR when shit happens, tracks will keep getting sued. This mentality has gone through every form of car and motorcycle road racing 30 years ago. The sport is dangerous enough as it is.

15
3
Hammer 663s
Posts
3064
Joined
6/2/2016
Location
Forest Grove, OR US
7/30/2025 9:11am
yak651 wrote:
Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse...

Exactly shit does happen but learn from it and if possible make some changes so if shit happens again it doesn’t result into an even worse outcome.

aees wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. Another thing...

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FdSBRcvPw/

It shouldnt be possible to hit a tree. It wasn't even a big mistake.

He jumped inside the track markers, he landed inside the track. 

Another thing that would and should never have passed a track security audit since you don't follow basic track design rules.

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. Should probably clear cut...

He only landed inside the track markers because he hit the tree. Otherwise he would have pulled a Jordan Smith off the side. 

Should probably clear cut Washougal now as well for safety, 


Not just directed at you, but it is a bit interesting the amount of comments saying the tree shouldn’t be there and you shouldn’t hit a tree if you make a mistake, etc, but a majority of the same folks say a 60’ cliff on the back side of a berm is fine and it’s the riders responsibility to not make the mistake or choose not not ride. I get the related lawsuit skews the opinions, and I am not saying I agree with sueing, but I don’t see how the scenarios are any different, yet they garner a different reaction. 

 

Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down after the Road jump.

8
kawasa84
Posts
1716
Joined
6/7/2008
Location
Flower Mound, TX US
7/30/2025 9:23am
Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down...

Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down after the Road jump.

This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to the right for more track. It was a very highspeed I believe going downhill section. Several times riders got very close but no one tagged it. But the speeds going by it were probably in excess of 35 plus mph. It is what it is I guess

4
1
Sparkalounger
Posts
1565
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN US
7/30/2025 10:05am
Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down...

Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down after the Road jump.

kawasa84 wrote:
This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to...

This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to the right for more track. It was a very highspeed I believe going downhill section. Several times riders got very close but no one tagged it. But the speeds going by it were probably in excess of 35 plus mph. It is what it is I guess

Yeah, watching this years broadcast I was thinking, "man, I guess they have always been there, but these guys are FLYING past trees that are VERY close"...  

It made me uneasy.  *But I was also laying my chair nursing a broken (chipped) hip from the the day before...

1
2
digger
Posts
799
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Upstate, NY US
7/30/2025 10:15am

Canning is a past JDay offroad champion, he knows how to go around trees fast. I'm sure he knew that tress was there, and what the consequences of hitting it could be. It just wasn't his day, unfortunately.

4
yak651
Posts
8554
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI US
Fantasy
7/30/2025 10:22am
Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down...

Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down after the Road jump.

kawasa84 wrote:
This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to...

This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to the right for more track. It was a very highspeed I believe going downhill section. Several times riders got very close but no one tagged it. But the speeds going by it were probably in excess of 35 plus mph. It is what it is I guess

Yeah watching t he broadcast that big bale seemed to be in a bad place 

2
1
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
7/30/2025 10:27am

Washougal Jeremy Hand accident is just another example of clueless track safety. If you are going to have a crowd that close to track, you need to protect them.

Put up a wooden fence at the top of the jump so bikes at least cant go sideways towards the crowd but only in the direction of the track. We would easily have to do that, but I doubt we would be allowed to have people that close in that position regardless.

Was a pretty scary getoff in Loket a few weeks before the GP ran now. Come GP, there was a large fence put up like 30-40 meters long to prevent it from happening again.

5
aees
Posts
2635
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
7/30/2025 10:29am
Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down...

Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down after the Road jump.

kawasa84 wrote:
This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to...

This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to the right for more track. It was a very highspeed I believe going downhill section. Several times riders got very close but no one tagged it. But the speeds going by it were probably in excess of 35 plus mph. It is what it is I guess

It was a Gajser oversized track marker 😅

At least this one you could see clearly but i agree it shouldn't have been there. Coming out of that sweeping turn high speed. Just a matter of time before someone gets pushed out there or they lock bars and hitting it.

1
1
Hammer 663s
Posts
3064
Joined
6/2/2016
Location
Forest Grove, OR US
7/30/2025 10:38am
Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down...

Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down after the Road jump.

kawasa84 wrote:
This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to...

This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to the right for more track. It was a very highspeed I believe going downhill section. Several times riders got very close but no one tagged it. But the speeds going by it were probably in excess of 35 plus mph. It is what it is I guess

I saw that - what a sketchy place to put a massive hay bale. Another local track likes to use huge loader tires. They have as much give as a tree.

1
1
7/30/2025 10:39am
AMetts wrote:
I mean how many thousands of riders have rode past that tree and not hit it, looks to me like he made a mistake and that...

I mean how many thousands of riders have rode past that tree and not hit it, looks to me like he made a mistake and that was that. 

It was like 96 degrees there yesterday, place needs as many trees as you can get or we can cut them all down and make it look like Pala. 

Keep the tree, move the track. Promoters are stupid.

18
Zucchini Nibs
Posts
753
Joined
1/10/2025
Location
Port angeles, WA US
7/30/2025 10:45am
AMetts wrote:
I mean how many thousands of riders have rode past that tree and not hit it, looks to me like he made a mistake and that...

I mean how many thousands of riders have rode past that tree and not hit it, looks to me like he made a mistake and that was that. 

It was like 96 degrees there yesterday, place needs as many trees as you can get or we can cut them all down and make it look like Pala. 

Taking a tree away from a jump doesn’t mean “cut all trees down”, there’s a perfect middle ground in slightly altering the track

11
Zucchini Nibs
Posts
753
Joined
1/10/2025
Location
Port angeles, WA US
7/30/2025 10:54am
lol, ok, 40? 30? 10? What ever the number is, doesn’t change that it’s no different then a tree off the side of the track, but...

lol, ok, 40? 30? 10? What ever the number is, doesn’t change that it’s no different then a tree off the side of the track, but the comments from most are the exact opposite. LACR=riders fault, Loretta’s=tracks fault. Explain the difference? 


Edit, looked at the thread with Rich’s statement, he said 30’, my mistake. 

I would argue Canning made a much less significant mistake than Rich’s son, not that it’s a competition or either of them need to blamed, but these aren’t the same situation

2
2
AMetts
Posts
1159
Joined
6/15/2022
Location
Lincolnton, NC US
7/30/2025 12:04pm
Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down...

Washougal has taken a number of trees down in the last few years to improve safety. Mostly in the section after Crandall's Cliff and coming down after the Road jump.

kawasa84 wrote:
This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to...

This years Washougal they set that massive round bale of hay to be used as a right side track marker and keep racers from drifting to the right for more track. It was a very highspeed I believe going downhill section. Several times riders got very close but no one tagged it. But the speeds going by it were probably in excess of 35 plus mph. It is what it is I guess

Yeah, watching this years broadcast I was thinking, "man, I guess they have always been there, but these guys are FLYING past trees that are VERY...

Yeah, watching this years broadcast I was thinking, "man, I guess they have always been there, but these guys are FLYING past trees that are VERY close"...  

It made me uneasy.  *But I was also laying my chair nursing a broken (chipped) hip from the the day before...

If that makes you nervous you should go watch a GNCC.

7
3
7/30/2025 12:19pm

There were steel cables on a jump at Red Bud that were very close to the track itself. 

4
1

Post a reply to: The tree at Loretta’s, WTF??

The Latest