Too bad US motocross doesn't welcome innovation

TerryB
Posts
2836
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN, USA
9/14/2010 6:15pm
newmann wrote:
like over in Europe. Stolen from some 2 Stroke Motocross site. Some TM components, Fox suspension and TGM custom touches. [img]http://twostrokemotocross.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/TGM125.jpg[/img] Cool article, especially the last...
like over in Europe. Stolen from some 2 Stroke Motocross site. Some TM components, Fox suspension and TGM custom touches.



Cool article, especially the last paragaph. Just some passionate motoheads giving back to the sport we all love.

http://twostrokemotocross.com/2010/09/tgm-makes-comeback-in-uem-emx-125…
And we know the state of California outlawed the sale of new 2 strokes a little while ago. Even if the Japanese manufacturers started producing them for the U.S. again, you couldn't get them in Cali.


Who fed you that line of crap? Please tell.

jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
9/14/2010 6:41pm
newmann wrote:
like over in Europe. Stolen from some 2 Stroke Motocross site. Some TM components, Fox suspension and TGM custom touches. [img]http://twostrokemotocross.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/TGM125.jpg[/img] Cool article, especially the last...
like over in Europe. Stolen from some 2 Stroke Motocross site. Some TM components, Fox suspension and TGM custom touches.



Cool article, especially the last paragaph. Just some passionate motoheads giving back to the sport we all love.

http://twostrokemotocross.com/2010/09/tgm-makes-comeback-in-uem-emx-125…
Mstock wrote:
Thanks for posting that. Awesome to see any trick handmade mx bike. Wish it was in the back of my truck! Pro AMA MX & SX...
Thanks for posting that. Awesome to see any trick handmade mx bike. Wish it was in the back of my truck!

Pro AMA MX & SX is 1% of my interest in this sport. The other 99% is my own racing, riding, training, wrenching, hanging with moto friends, etc. Who has time to watch someone else race? I will think of team USA when they go to the line because I will be on the starting gate at the same time.

Many of us are leaving the sport because of the cost of maintaining 4 strokes. I love them. I just can't afford them every year. A $6,000 two stroke is not the answer. Knock it down to $4,000 and the sport will explode. The racing was just as fun back in the 90's. That technology was far more than most of us could ever use today.

I like Steve Matthes. I like his humor, videos and articles. But maybe he feels we are like fans of the NFL or Nascar? You know the type. The people that don't play football or race cars. If so, he is very wrong.

Motocross is much different and that is getting lost. We buy the bikes. We buy the gear. We pay to race. We are the sport.

Maybe this board is not the place to post topics about our personal racing desires and should be only for topics regarding Pro MX and Pro SX. Those of us who buy bikes and gear should find somewhere else to hang out. That's the feeling I get from Matthes.

I apologize in advance if this offends,it's not meant to. This is more about my personal experience of spending many years, at the amateur national level, then four years at the pro level.

The big # 1.
Racing budgets, far surpass the profit from the "competition dirt bike division of an OEM. No real big money to be made as far as this part of their business. The entire reason they continue to fund this part of their business is "name branding". Go to your local dealer and ask him how much he makes from the competition dirt bike sales.

#2
Some bitch and moan, about the cost of four strokes, but get a giant woody over one off two stroke machines. Please tell me where the logic is here.

The four stroke started out as a tool that leveled out the playing field. Today, it's not what it use to be in the lites class. Well funded teams like Pro Circuit, and Factory Connection, have the advantage. It's still working in the large bore class (as long as the don't change the displacement to 350cc) and is one of the best things to happen to the sport, as far as pro level racing. No one is out motored.

#3
This is where some of you will get pissed.
You mention that Steve linked you to fans of NFL football or NASCAR fans. Reality is that those of us that are weekend warriors, are no more than fat ass, beer drinking flag football players. Or some clown that buys a chevy monte carlo and puts a big # 3 on the rear windshield. Get the hell over it guys, and take a look above at #1. Again, if you think I am full of shit, ask your local dealer what they make on competition dirt bike sales.

#4
The weekend warrior may be the sport, when it comes to things like gear, pipes and other after market products. Don't get to excited about that, because they are not driving the market. They are just making what they can off of the sport.

#5
Don't go all LB on Steve, because he doesn't tell you what you want to hear. Although I don't always agree with Steve, he has a very good understanding of our sport. A much better understanding than most on this board.

Please don't take offence, but reality isn't always pretty. Just be happy that you can be some what involved in the sport that you love.


Tbteam
Posts
2867
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Ormond Beach, FL, USA
9/14/2010 7:36pm
My problem with Mathes has nothing to do with him "not telling me what I want to hear".

The problem is that he thinks that I should want to hear what he has to say, and take it as insider gospel.

I don't need him to tell me anything. Not with his huge ego.
swizcore
Posts
4234
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
9/14/2010 7:39pm
Tbteam wrote:
My problem with Mathes has nothing to do with him "not telling me what I want to hear". The problem is that he thinks that I...
My problem with Mathes has nothing to do with him "not telling me what I want to hear".

The problem is that he thinks that I should want to hear what he has to say, and take it as insider gospel.

I don't need him to tell me anything. Not with his huge ego.
Really?
He emailed/texted/called you and said that?

The Shop

jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
9/14/2010 7:40pm
Tbteam wrote:
My problem with Mathes has nothing to do with him "not telling me what I want to hear". The problem is that he thinks that I...
My problem with Mathes has nothing to do with him "not telling me what I want to hear".

The problem is that he thinks that I should want to hear what he has to say, and take it as insider gospel.

I don't need him to tell me anything. Not with his huge ego.
Big egos are a normal part of this business.
CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA, USA
9/14/2010 7:43pm
Pretty bike !

do they make a 300cc version?

hehe
gaines1016
Posts
98
Joined
6/8/2010
Location
Sioux City, IA, USA
9/14/2010 7:48pm
i like
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
9/14/2010 7:51pm
Let me try this again. This site has been acting funny for the last few days.

Big egos are the norm in this sport or business.

We all have our icons. I fully understand that Matthes is not your icon, or mine as far as that goes. But that doesn't mean that what he said was incorrect or wrong
petegrath
Posts
1112
Joined
5/18/2009
Location
John's Island, SC, USA
9/14/2010 8:03pm
TerryB wrote:
[b]And we know the state of California outlawed the sale of new 2 strokes a little while ago. Even if the Japanese manufacturers started producing them...
And we know the state of California outlawed the sale of new 2 strokes a little while ago. Even if the Japanese manufacturers started producing them for the U.S. again, you couldn't get them in Cali.


Who fed you that line of crap? Please tell.

Unfortunately, I only remember reading about the debate and the supposed legislation a few years ago. I can't quote facts, so I guess I shouldn't have said "we know" regarding the law in California. That's pretty much why I'm asking.

It's my understanding that manufacturers of motorcycles can not sell new two strokes in the state of California. I understood that it was grand-fathered for the sale of older bikes, but new ones couldn't be sold due to environmental regulations.

Again, it's been a few years since the debate was had, but I'm pretty sure what I just summarized was what happened.

I do distinctly remember the stories about new two strokes being outlawed in California. Even if I can't quote sources.

Again, if I'm wrong, let me know. Where am I wrong?
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
9/14/2010 8:05pm
You can still buy YZ Yamaha's and SX KTM's in CA.
petegrath
Posts
1112
Joined
5/18/2009
Location
John's Island, SC, USA
9/14/2010 8:06pm
I'm honestly asking, and not starting a pissing contest here.
TerryB
Posts
2836
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN, USA
9/14/2010 8:14pm
There is no law banning or prohibiting the sale of 2-strokes of any kind in CA.

There are emission standards for "green sticker" legal riding areas. The 2-strokes can't meet those standards. Oh, by the way, neither can MX 4-strokes.
TerryB
Posts
2836
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN, USA
9/14/2010 8:20pm
petegrath wrote:
I'm honestly asking, and not starting a pissing contest here.
Didn't take it as such. Just amazed at the misinformation out there.

Moto East Mag
Posts
3462
Joined
9/4/2006
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
9/14/2010 8:21pm
Matthes=good-for-the-sport.
calimxer91
Posts
5077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
9/14/2010 8:22pm
CR250Rider wrote:
Pretty bike !

do they make a 300cc version?

hehe
Man ,if only...


jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
9/14/2010 8:23pm
TerryB wrote:
There is no law banning or prohibiting the sale of 2-strokes of any kind in CA. There [i]are[/i] emission standards for "green sticker" legal riding areas...
There is no law banning or prohibiting the sale of 2-strokes of any kind in CA.

There are emission standards for "green sticker" legal riding areas. The 2-strokes can't meet those standards. Oh, by the way, neither can MX 4-strokes.
Typical CA.

DrSweden
Posts
6761
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
9/14/2010 9:16pm
I think Cam suggestion is right on. I also suggested a year ago that some fart should buy the old plates, molds or whatever it's called, for the CR125 02-07 and produce the sucker in China or some other low salary country. I mean If they can sell these crappy four stroke pit bikes for $ 500, I'm guessing they could produce some smoker for less than 4 k that's operational and don't break. that easily

Also there's a huge potential in this market if you look at the pit bike industry with all the bling crap bits one can buy for what? A little shitty CRF50 made for kids? Imagine if you had the same market for this CR125 and you could buy orange, blue or whatever plastics, rims, exhaust etc and maybe even diff design?

I know my KX250F is so much better than my previous CR125, but right now my KX250F isn't running because of four stroke issues (sure no biggie), and I wouldn't mind taking a spin on that Chinese CR125 until the KX250F parts arrive!

Instead of these crazy new companies with shit for brains creating V-twins, inverted engines, full carbon whatever, 700 cc two stroke engines or whatever and rewake old names as Benelli, Maico etc they should just be humble and build a low budget dirtbke that can sell.

I'm suggesting the average C-rider couldn't feell the diff between a Showa A-forks kit and OEM forks from early nineties. So why the hell are I watching myself and other shit heads riding around on race machines with anodized forks, titanium valves and 40 hp at 13:000 rpm when we would probably be better of with a moped. So spit out a low budget bike that looks modern for christ sake and the poor masses will return?
budlong802
Posts
71
Joined
4/5/2010
Location
Vacaville, CA, USA
9/14/2010 9:31pm
Nothing at all smart assed meant about this I just want to understand why the 4 stroke is killing the sport. 2 strokes are legal to race all classes albeit at a disadvantage in some classes but there are 2 stroke only classes and no one races in them. If your fast on a 2 stroke you can be competitive in most classes, ive seen fast 2 stroke riders smoke 4 stroke riders.So why does the amount of money the other guy spends on his bike affect how much you spend on yours. 250 2 strokes can race with the 250fs in someplaces and thats a huge advantage for the 2 stroke its faster and cheaper than the competition. If your kids moving up to the 250f class put him on a 125 hes not probably going to be winning at first anyway so again a 2 stk budget. Or is the argument
more at the pro level and if it is how does that affect how much you will spend to race.We race 4 strokes and so far its been affordable but at some point if it becomes to expensive
and we have to switch to 2stks we wil but we wont quit. I guess i just dont understand why if 2 strokes are so cheap to race(maintain) why are people quitting rather than racing them. And I agree with most of you there is nothing like watching a pro rip on a 125. I would love to see a shit load of them out there.
MX4EVR
Posts
835
Joined
7/27/2010
Location
Canton, OH, USA
9/14/2010 9:40pm
2 strokes RULE, ask Josh Grant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WORCSRacer
Posts
2295
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Clovis, CA, USA
9/14/2010 9:53pm Edited Date/Time 9/14/2010 9:59pm
jmar wrote:
I apologize in advance if this offends,it's not meant to. This is more about my personal experience of spending many years, at the amateur national level...
I apologize in advance if this offends,it's not meant to. This is more about my personal experience of spending many years, at the amateur national level, then four years at the pro level.

The big # 1.
Racing budgets, far surpass the profit from the "competition dirt bike division of an OEM. No real big money to be made as far as this part of their business. The entire reason they continue to fund this part of their business is "name branding". Go to your local dealer and ask him how much he makes from the competition dirt bike sales.

#2
Some bitch and moan, about the cost of four strokes, but get a giant woody over one off two stroke machines. Please tell me where the logic is here.

The four stroke started out as a tool that leveled out the playing field. Today, it's not what it use to be in the lites class. Well funded teams like Pro Circuit, and Factory Connection, have the advantage. It's still working in the large bore class (as long as the don't change the displacement to 350cc) and is one of the best things to happen to the sport, as far as pro level racing. No one is out motored.

#3
This is where some of you will get pissed.
You mention that Steve linked you to fans of NFL football or NASCAR fans. Reality is that those of us that are weekend warriors, are no more than fat ass, beer drinking flag football players. Or some clown that buys a chevy monte carlo and puts a big # 3 on the rear windshield. Get the hell over it guys, and take a look above at #1. Again, if you think I am full of shit, ask your local dealer what they make on competition dirt bike sales.

#4
The weekend warrior may be the sport, when it comes to things like gear, pipes and other after market products. Don't get to excited about that, because they are not driving the market. They are just making what they can off of the sport.

#5
Don't go all LB on Steve, because he doesn't tell you what you want to hear. Although I don't always agree with Steve, he has a very good understanding of our sport. A much better understanding than most on this board.

Please don't take offence, but reality isn't always pretty. Just be happy that you can be some what involved in the sport that you love.


jmar a couple of things...



Reason #1 Its over. No OEM is "losing" their own money to go racing today. They are spending sponsor dollars. The reason for most of the budget cuts and why teams aren't buying championships is they are not willing to lose money to race. Period. Dirtbikes are not a losing proposition to the OEM's. They are expected to provide a ROI to the company and if the don't they are going to be eliminated.



Reason #3 WTF is "branding" for if not to sell bikes? Why do it? Do you think Yamaha races MX to sell Pianos and Guitars? ah no. Do you think the Yamaha Star buyer knows who Josh Grant is? Do you think they care?



Reason #4 The aftermarket is the market! Its creating the market and the culture. I'm sure that Fox and Alpinestars do not share your opinion of them "not driving the market".



Finally I think somewhere during those "4 years at the pro level" you lost sight of something pretty important: There would be no Pro's without the people that support this industry as fans and most importantly as consumers.
wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
9/14/2010 9:54pm
i haven't read five more pages of this stuff, most know my opinion. I will add. Personally i could give a crap what Cali does. Mainly because most of the time it's the reason for somethnig being screwed up and not the remedy.

I said it before somewhere in here and will repeat it.

two strokes will out last the modern four strokes simply because people are lazy about maintaining bikes. it will cost a rider a lot more if he blows a thumper turd and they stop riding because it was all the money they had. that is why they quit.

now. will that change no.

either the people who ride will need to make more money, or four strokes will have to become more "rider maintainance friendly" or lack of.

I doubt either will happen, so where it is going to hurt is not the big pro bullshit stuff, it will kick the little guy in the nuts.

Joe blow raceway in never never land will have less riders/racers and well what that will translate to................less pro's in 5 years, less new riders in the sport. etc. etc.

want to say here comes the black (red) helicopters fine don't really care. What do know is what i see every day, and every weekend here in never never land............

Lets see how the "big" boys will handle a 30% reduction in riders like we have seen in this area...

then we all can sit back and point fingers who did what. by that time everyone will have found something else to do.


wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
9/14/2010 9:54pm Edited Date/Time 9/14/2010 10:18pm
... i may never get used to this board.....i miss the old one.
YAKMX
Posts
198
Joined
4/17/2008
Location
Allegany, NY, USA
9/14/2010 10:11pm

I'm suggesting the average C-rider couldn't feell the diff between a Showa A-forks kit and OEM forks from early nineties. So why the hell are I watching myself and other shit heads riding around on race machines with anodized forks, titanium valves and 40 hp at 13:000 rpm when we would probably be better of with a moped. So spit out a low budget bike that looks modern for christ sake and the poor masses will return?
X2!
OW38B
Posts
3619
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Coto de Caza, CA, USA
9/14/2010 10:40pm
TerryB wrote:
There is no law banning or prohibiting the sale of 2-strokes of any kind in CA. There [i]are[/i] emission standards for "green sticker" legal riding areas...
There is no law banning or prohibiting the sale of 2-strokes of any kind in CA.

There are emission standards for "green sticker" legal riding areas. The 2-strokes can't meet those standards. Oh, by the way, neither can MX 4-strokes.
jmar wrote:
Typical CA.

The Peoples Republic of California.

Also the 4 strokes have sound requirement issues to deal with at some locations.
SwapperMX
Posts
2153
Joined
6/16/2010
Location
AU
9/14/2010 11:18pm Edited Date/Time 9/14/2010 11:23pm
Hey Budlong,

There are a lot of answers to your questions. People see the pro's racing four strokes and decide that they HAVE to race a four stroke to be "competitive". Also, there is a sheep mentality, and because 99% of bikes on the start grids are four stroke, riders think that they HAVE to be on a four stroke to be "competitive", or will be at a disadvantage. New riders to the sport see all their mates on four strokes, so go and buy a four stroke themselves, even if it is an old shitbox. Just cause they dont know any better. Also another factor, if they do try a two and four stroke back to back with little riding experience, the four stroke is easier to go faster on and therefore that is the bike they choose. Sad, but true.
Wolfman
Posts
2675
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Bixby, OK, USA
9/15/2010 1:05am
I hate getting into this old argument, but the real problem with this sport is the pros ride what we ride. As long as the OEMs have to put their factory superstars on the line in front of thousands of fans and a tv and internet audience, they are going to continue to develop higher technology and add it to the production bikes next year or the year after. That is going to keep the price skyrocketing.


ATKpilot99
Posts
10476
Joined
4/13/2010
Location
Lake Geneva, WI, USA
9/15/2010 4:48am Edited Date/Time 9/15/2010 4:51am
Wolfman wrote:
I hate getting into this old argument, but the real problem with this sport is the pros ride what we ride. As long as the OEMs...
I hate getting into this old argument, but the real problem with this sport is the pros ride what we ride. As long as the OEMs have to put their factory superstars on the line in front of thousands of fans and a tv and internet audience, they are going to continue to develop higher technology and add it to the production bikes next year or the year after. That is going to keep the price skyrocketing.


Makes me wonder if the AMA production rule and the homologation rule has even done what it was supposed to do . The factories still use and test parts not available to the public and then that technology trickles down to production , sort of like when there were works bikes . It has always been a sham . Make a real production rule and drop the stupid homologation rule to foster some competition from the smaller manufacturers and maybe costs will level off .
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
9/15/2010 6:29am
jmar wrote:
I apologize in advance if this offends,it's not meant to. This is more about my personal experience of spending many years, at the amateur national level...
I apologize in advance if this offends,it's not meant to. This is more about my personal experience of spending many years, at the amateur national level, then four years at the pro level.

The big # 1.
Racing budgets, far surpass the profit from the "competition dirt bike division of an OEM. No real big money to be made as far as this part of their business. The entire reason they continue to fund this part of their business is "name branding". Go to your local dealer and ask him how much he makes from the competition dirt bike sales.

#2
Some bitch and moan, about the cost of four strokes, but get a giant woody over one off two stroke machines. Please tell me where the logic is here.

The four stroke started out as a tool that leveled out the playing field. Today, it's not what it use to be in the lites class. Well funded teams like Pro Circuit, and Factory Connection, have the advantage. It's still working in the large bore class (as long as the don't change the displacement to 350cc) and is one of the best things to happen to the sport, as far as pro level racing. No one is out motored.

#3
This is where some of you will get pissed.
You mention that Steve linked you to fans of NFL football or NASCAR fans. Reality is that those of us that are weekend warriors, are no more than fat ass, beer drinking flag football players. Or some clown that buys a chevy monte carlo and puts a big # 3 on the rear windshield. Get the hell over it guys, and take a look above at #1. Again, if you think I am full of shit, ask your local dealer what they make on competition dirt bike sales.

#4
The weekend warrior may be the sport, when it comes to things like gear, pipes and other after market products. Don't get to excited about that, because they are not driving the market. They are just making what they can off of the sport.

#5
Don't go all LB on Steve, because he doesn't tell you what you want to hear. Although I don't always agree with Steve, he has a very good understanding of our sport. A much better understanding than most on this board.

Please don't take offence, but reality isn't always pretty. Just be happy that you can be some what involved in the sport that you love.


WORCSRacer wrote:
jmar a couple of things... Reason #1 Its over. No OEM is "losing" their own money to go racing today. They are spending sponsor dollars. The...
jmar a couple of things...



Reason #1 Its over. No OEM is "losing" their own money to go racing today. They are spending sponsor dollars. The reason for most of the budget cuts and why teams aren't buying championships is they are not willing to lose money to race. Period. Dirtbikes are not a losing proposition to the OEM's. They are expected to provide a ROI to the company and if the don't they are going to be eliminated.



Reason #3 WTF is "branding" for if not to sell bikes? Why do it? Do you think Yamaha races MX to sell Pianos and Guitars? ah no. Do you think the Yamaha Star buyer knows who Josh Grant is? Do you think they care?



Reason #4 The aftermarket is the market! Its creating the market and the culture. I'm sure that Fox and Alpinestars do not share your opinion of them "not driving the market".



Finally I think somewhere during those "4 years at the pro level" you lost sight of something pretty important: There would be no Pro's without the people that support this industry as fans and most importantly as consumers.
WORCSRacer

How many "competition" dirt bike units are sold every year between the big 4?
Not as many as some of you seem to think. It's not a big money maker for anyone and it's just a part (small part) of their business. That's why today, the OEMs are having to go outside of the industry to pay for the large racing budgets of today.

As far as "Name Branding". You have no reason to take my word for it, so talk to someone in marketing about this.

Supercross is the best proof that the weekend moto enthusiast, is not a driving force of pro level racing. The majority of those filling the seats are not the people buying products related to the industry. Your standard ticket buyer is the same fan that attends things like Monster Trucks and Tractor Pulls. I don't know if it's the same now, but years ago, it was the same promoters.
mxrose3
Posts
2368
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Delmar, DE, USA
9/15/2010 7:30am
ThePipe wrote:
I wonder how empty our sport will be in 20-30yrs
(I'm speaking of local MX) <--- You know the backbone of our sport.

How many of you Old Schoolers grew up just like me, having to fund everything myself because my parents didn't like MX (I'm sure alot of you did)

I afforded it by working after school and Summers on a Tree Farm for $3.00ph


I've been hardcore MX since the late 70s til now and have spent thousands over the last 32 years.
Back then if I had to deal with the cost's the current 4 strokes bring to the table..... I would have split by 1980 and spent my $ elsewhere

Imagine being the same MX crazed kid you were then but growing up now?
No Money to fix the F-Bomb...... so you sell it and get out and never come back.
(Actually prolly No Money to even buy an F-Bomb)
Years down the road you won't be introducing your kids to MX like alot of us have.

I know I would never have gotten my son and step son into it and we spend plenty of cash every year.

When the 2 strokes are gone for good....... Myself and my MX budget will be gone for good too

I'm not pissing and moaning here, just stating where I stand.

Lee, you said it all right here.
I'm right there with ya.
newmann
Posts
24437
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
9/15/2010 7:39am
I do get all amped up over a one off 2 stroke, I'll be the first to admit that. But I've had to wipe a little drool while eyeing over the Pro-Circuit 250F's as well. I appreciate all the "finer things" moto related 2 stroke or 4, no discrimination there. But you really have to admit that $200,000.00 a pop KX250F's are a little out of the realm of what is supposed to be the entry level, up and coming, on his way to the premier class race bike. That 125 class might just be the ticket to get things back on track.The one off two stroke, without current homologation rules (but also with realistic limitations)might just lead to better things for the moto public.

As far as bike sales go and what dealers make off of a competition motocross bike? Well I would guess they make nothing off of a 2-3 year old 450 dust collector that finally gets rolled out at $3850.00 + tax. They're not exactly selling like hotcakes and I doubt a little boost in the economy will change that too much. But at 8-9 grand based off of parts and materials alone, I'm guessing there is quite a bit being made per 250 pound unit sitting on the floor next to 750 pounds of equally priced V-Twin cruiser or 500 pound 4 cylinder entry level crotch rocket.

Post a reply to: Too bad US motocross doesn't welcome innovation

The Latest