What’s the most ambulances you’ve seen in a day…

StillSmokin
Posts
739
Joined
3/18/2022
Location
Edmond, OK, USA
5/18/2025 8:53am

Tracks are too fast.

Brent wrote:
I disagree.moto has evolved into what it is today because riders and bikes have improved so much over the last 20 years.It’s not as easy as...

I disagree.
moto has evolved into what it is today because riders and bikes have improved so much over the last 20 years.

It’s not as easy as it used to be for sure, but as dirt bikes get more capable, riders get fitter and more skilled, there is a demand for tracks that are more challenging.  

Out in my area, tracks are packed with skilled riders of all ages doing all the jumps and rhythm sections. 
 


 

  

It's physics...Kinetic energy increases with the square of speed, at 50mph you have 4 times as much kinetic energy as at 25mph.If you ride a dirt...

It's physics...

image 1618.png?VersionId=t5JobBFc7VDFk60v1NuI6PuFzcR

Kinetic energy increases with the square of speed, at 50mph you have 4 times as much kinetic energy as at 25mph.

If you ride a dirt bike, you are going to crash, are you more likely to walk away from a crash at low speed or a crash at high speed?

The kids would be doing crazier shit today on the old bikes too if they were still available. Skateboards haven’t changed in a quarter century but we have 9-10 year olds today saying “when it’s scary tricks I just go for it”. Tricks that lots of pros didn’t do 20 years ago because they were literally too scared. Same as the guys doing freestyle moto. Some guys bowed out of the sport because they didn’t want to keep up with backflips even though they all had access to the same quality of bikes…

It’s progression there is no stopping it especially with social media where you can see what is possible and have a frame work to push from. Kids see what the pros do and think that’s the norm so that’s their baseline. It will only get “worse” and that’s ok because people like to push limits. Trying to pull back progression because of injuries is fuckin stupid, you guys sound like Big Government trying to protect people from themselves which all of you claim to hate 🥲

https://youtu.be/uyvD7HrVat8?feature=shared

7
1
5/18/2025 9:13am

Tracks seem to just be wide open now, Cahuilla especially, 450’s are too fast and tons of people don’t have the strength or even skill anymore to handle them when things go bad. Like I’ve said before, plenty of people at the track doing things/jumps they wouldn’t be doing if they were on two strokes. Tracks need to be slowed down

7
1
MC943
Posts
189
Joined
3/2/2023
Location
Glendale, CA, USA
5/18/2025 9:24am
ML512 wrote:
Out riding at Cahuilla this weekend, they’re on their four ambulance and second helicopter of the day. Seeing more than one ambulance a day at Cahuilla...

Out riding at Cahuilla this weekend, they’re on their four ambulance and second helicopter of the day. Seeing more than one ambulance a day at Cahuilla or Fox Raceway on a weekend day has become the norm from what I’ve seen. Is this common anywhere else?

Yea , I was there yesterday, it was horrible. After they close the vet track for one hr , I left. 

captmoto
Posts
5908
Joined
4/22/2009
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
5/18/2025 9:29am

I think I've seen 3. Something that bothers but I'm not sure contributes, is really fast guys on vet tracks. Some fast guy yelled at me in a corner and I'm thinking, "if you're such hot shit, why aren't you on the main?". Track refreshes at State Fair and Pala usually had steep jump faces with lips. I heard Ping and I think Troy Lee on Whiskey Throttle talking about injuries and that now vet tracks were getting riskier.

2

The Shop

5/18/2025 10:44am
So over the years it seems like jump faces have become less steep, the logic is to make them easier and safer, but what ends up...

So over the years it seems like jump faces have become less steep, the logic is to make them easier and safer, but what ends up happening is everyone hits the thing wide open, and then guys that have no business jumping at all end up dead sailoring every jump on the track, caseing it and side swapping. Another issue i see is that tracks are getting wider and wider and longer straight aways. Once again the logic is safety. but what ends up happening is higher speeds. I remember tracks like LACR and Gorman having a lot steeper jumps and shorter straights, and the tracks being narrower. Food for thought

JM485 wrote:
Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips...

Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips and somehow the injury rate is even higher.  Slow the tracks down, add some technical features, and stop making them flat freeways because this experiment clearly isn’t working.

Yes and the long term affect is that tracks are not building skills in new riders, just making them have a false confidence and as soon as something goes wrong it looks like they hit a land mine. I remember being a kid and really having to calculate wether or not I was about to bust my ass trying a new jump. I ride at a well known private track that still has real jumps and I see it all the time when new guys come in and have a serious reality check on their skill levels and are sketched out on almost every every jump, and on the flip side I’ve seen those same guys improve rapidly over a couple weekends.

3
1
Dave v3.0
Posts
723
Joined
7/15/2022
Location
Ozark, AL, USA
5/18/2025 11:16am

Unpopular opinion incoming .

Bikes FAR exceed the rider's skill levels and make them think they have skills they don't.  They are too easy to go fast on.  Very few riders actually take any sort of riding classes to improve their skills and when you couple that with a lack of knowledge of track etiquette it's a bad mix.  The same testosterone that fueled noobs buying YZF-R1s for the street makes them buy a YZ450 for the dirt.  They walk right by the beginner bikes and head straight for something that will hurt them.

Throw in the influence of SX on outdoor tracks and that same testosterone tells them they can do all the jumps all the time.  The degree of injuries and number of deaths I see in the sport today is appalling.  I have a much wider view of the sport than most that dates back to the early 70's when there were an incredible number of bikes being sold, tracks everywhere, and the sport was REALLY booming.  It was rare for an ambulance to ever leave the track on a race day and until Jim West died in 1974 (from an injury that was misdiagnosed at the ER) you never heard of any fatalities in motocross.  

It disturbs me greatly that the sport has come to this point.  There are so many great things about motocross.  I fear if there aren't changes to make the sport safer (notice I didn't say SAFE) that it will continue this spiral until there are no tracks.  All it will take is a rogue legislator fueled by a lobbyist to bring an end all tracks or make them so expensive that no one can afford a track day.  We need to police our sport before its gone.

19
vdrsnk04
Posts
2278
Joined
9/5/2018
Location
USA
5/18/2025 11:19am
Brent wrote:
I disagree.moto has evolved into what it is today because riders and bikes have improved so much over the last 20 years.It’s not as easy as...

I disagree.
moto has evolved into what it is today because riders and bikes have improved so much over the last 20 years.

It’s not as easy as it used to be for sure, but as dirt bikes get more capable, riders get fitter and more skilled, there is a demand for tracks that are more challenging.  

Out in my area, tracks are packed with skilled riders of all ages doing all the jumps and rhythm sections. 
 


 

  

It's physics...Kinetic energy increases with the square of speed, at 50mph you have 4 times as much kinetic energy as at 25mph.If you ride a dirt...

It's physics...

image 1618.png?VersionId=t5JobBFc7VDFk60v1NuI6PuFzcR

Kinetic energy increases with the square of speed, at 50mph you have 4 times as much kinetic energy as at 25mph.

If you ride a dirt bike, you are going to crash, are you more likely to walk away from a crash at low speed or a crash at high speed?

The kids would be doing crazier shit today on the old bikes too if they were still available. Skateboards haven’t changed in a quarter century but...

The kids would be doing crazier shit today on the old bikes too if they were still available. Skateboards haven’t changed in a quarter century but we have 9-10 year olds today saying “when it’s scary tricks I just go for it”. Tricks that lots of pros didn’t do 20 years ago because they were literally too scared. Same as the guys doing freestyle moto. Some guys bowed out of the sport because they didn’t want to keep up with backflips even though they all had access to the same quality of bikes…

It’s progression there is no stopping it especially with social media where you can see what is possible and have a frame work to push from. Kids see what the pros do and think that’s the norm so that’s their baseline. It will only get “worse” and that’s ok because people like to push limits. Trying to pull back progression because of injuries is fuckin stupid, you guys sound like Big Government trying to protect people from themselves which all of you claim to hate 🥲

https://youtu.be/uyvD7HrVat8?feature=shared

Exactly, you can put all the riders on mo-ped’s with flat tires and the best and fastest guys will still figure out to get every ounce of speed out of it and then some. People are competitive and will figure it out no matter the constraint.

Look at drag racing. Quite a long while ago they reduced the track length from 1/4 mile, the standard since the beginning because the cars were getting too fast. Then look, the all time speed record was just recently set surpassing the previous 1/4 mile speed lol!

Look at powerboat top speed shootout, specifically the one at lake of the Ozarks. About a decade ago a boat called Spirit Of Qatar set the record at 244mph on the 1 mile course. They said it was unsafe so they shortened the track. This past year they went j believe 221mph. So I am assuming they will get there too, like the drag racing.


Moral of the story is, the riders themselves CHOOSE to make it unsafe by pushing every limit possible to beat their competitor. Can some things be done on some tracks, of course! But it will still remain unsafe. 

But to ML’s post, man I can’t imagine seeing that much in one day! I’d have packed it up and left. 

2
5/18/2025 11:44am
So over the years it seems like jump faces have become less steep, the logic is to make them easier and safer, but what ends up...

So over the years it seems like jump faces have become less steep, the logic is to make them easier and safer, but what ends up happening is everyone hits the thing wide open, and then guys that have no business jumping at all end up dead sailoring every jump on the track, caseing it and side swapping. Another issue i see is that tracks are getting wider and wider and longer straight aways. Once again the logic is safety. but what ends up happening is higher speeds. I remember tracks like LACR and Gorman having a lot steeper jumps and shorter straights, and the tracks being narrower. Food for thought

JM485 wrote:
Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips...

Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips and somehow the injury rate is even higher.  Slow the tracks down, add some technical features, and stop making them flat freeways because this experiment clearly isn’t working.

Longer, smoother, wider jump approaches make tracks safer because they lead to less acceleration bumps going into jumps - it's smoother and more predictable lines on the approach, same with the jump faces - any jump situation where a rider can build speed into the jump is safer than requiring a rider to be hard on the gas going into the jump and through the jump. Riders have a choice on what speed to hit stuff at.   Having more "technical" steeper jump faces out of turns makes tracks less safe because less experienced riders can't safely build speed into them.  They accelerate hard out of the turn, usually sitting down, and try to seat bounce and the jump approached get nasty acceleration bumps which unsettle the bikes on the jump approach or the jumps develop kickers from everyone accelerating on the jump face. Same thing with the landings - if more technical requiring hard acceleration on landings to make the next obstacle, you get pot holes on the landings from guys landing with the throttle on hard. Smoother is safer when the track design is right.  Thinking that steeper more technical jumps will make a track safer is ridiculous. That's like saying Supercross is safer than Motocross (it's not).  If you want to "slow a track down" to be safer, add more TURNS and don't make the jumps so big, along with BIG gradual landings (not postage stamp landings).  Thing is (especially out west), more turns requires more track prep (fuel and time) and more water.  Jumps properly built (the ones that don't get acceleration bumps and nasty kickers on them) don't require as much water or fuel to rework them between ride days.

7
4
sdmx
Posts
404
Joined
10/30/2013
Location
Oceanside, CA, USA
5/18/2025 3:19pm

How crowded is Cahuilla on Wednesdays?   Thinking of going this week for the first time in years.  Slow vet track guy.  

Brent
Posts
5887
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
5/18/2025 3:50pm Edited Date/Time 5/18/2025 3:56pm
sdmx wrote:

How crowded is Cahuilla on Wednesdays?   Thinking of going this week for the first time in years.  Slow vet track guy.  

Last Wednesday was not bad, just get there early or struggle to park up top.

Most riders clear out by noon. So 12-2 is good if  you need to learn the tracks.  Another option on Wednesdays is the Perris vet track, very rider friendly, it’s mostly a turn track with some very small jumps 

1
sdmx
Posts
404
Joined
10/30/2013
Location
Oceanside, CA, USA
5/18/2025 4:01pm
sdmx wrote:

How crowded is Cahuilla on Wednesdays?   Thinking of going this week for the first time in years.  Slow vet track guy.  

Brent wrote:
Last Wednesday was not bad, just get there early or struggle to park up top.Most riders clear out by noon. So 12-2 is good if  you...

Last Wednesday was not bad, just get there early or struggle to park up top.

Most riders clear out by noon. So 12-2 is good if  you need to learn the tracks.  Another option on Wednesdays is the Perris vet track, very rider friendly, it’s mostly a turn track with some very small jumps 

Thanks!   

5/18/2025 4:07pm

Our entry level bikes back in the day were 100 and 125,s, same power of a 85 nowdsys.

We learnt skills, and if we were improved, we moved up to 250cc, probably as fast as a modern 125cc.

4
braketap
Posts
3
Joined
5/26/2022
Location
Cairo, GA, USA
5/18/2025 4:50pm

Am I the only one who thinks fox needs practice sessions, or at least split up minis and big bikes?

4
1
Brent
Posts
5887
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
5/18/2025 4:52pm Edited Date/Time 5/18/2025 4:52pm
braketap wrote:

Am I the only one who thinks fox needs practice sessions, or at least split up minis and big bikes?

they started splitting practices two weeks ago after Prado almost ran over a kid.

Who knows if they will keep the format after the national.

2
ohh_454
Posts
3535
Joined
6/24/2023
Location
Nuevo, CA, USA
Fantasy
5/18/2025 5:03pm

Tracks too hard, people complain. If the tracks too easy, people complain. If the bikes sitting on the stand by itself at the tracks, it’s not going to hurt anyone. Maybe it’s the rider making bad choices or not baking it down 85% of the time? The other 15% maybe comes down to bike failure or hitting a kicker on accident? Anytime I had a bad crash, I know I was pushing it and not just trying to cruise. 

2
1
wicksy85
Posts
596
Joined
1/5/2011
Location
Mackay, QLD, AU
5/18/2025 5:13pm

I remember a few years ago at a local series meet they had to call the race meet off as the hospital couldn't handle any more patients, I think there was close to 10 mx riders in there

snowy816
Posts
494
Joined
9/11/2009
Location
AU
5/18/2025 5:43pm
ML512 wrote:
Out riding at Cahuilla this weekend, they’re on their four ambulance and second helicopter of the day. Seeing more than one ambulance a day at Cahuilla...

Out riding at Cahuilla this weekend, they’re on their four ambulance and second helicopter of the day. Seeing more than one ambulance a day at Cahuilla or Fox Raceway on a weekend day has become the norm from what I’ve seen. Is this common anywhere else?

2003 Avalon I flew down to Melbourne to help a mate out racing at the Speedway - If emeory serves me correct Boydy and Hoges designed the track and were CDR Yamaha YZ250 and Troy Carrol was on CDR YZF250 along with Daniel McCoy (both raced in USE at some time) - it was the wildest Supercross track I have ever seen massive dragon back to double big step on step off and the one section  was a left hander hip double Troy Carroll was hitting in second grabbing two gears and holding it wide open to a 130ft triple and it was a booter man. 

 

They even painted the massive upramp up the middle big white line and held at riders meeting that is your not doing the triple stay to the left of the white line..

 

Some broken wrist were had that day and allot of crashes - lets juts say Ambulance was non stop.

1
gharmon
Posts
2766
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Valley, AL, USA
5/18/2025 7:23pm

About 22 came to ER last night. 10 were just drunks alone. Lol jk

While at the tracks near me I don't really see a whole lot. Good thing I suppose.. but the tracks out here get way more volume it seems

5/18/2025 9:25pm
KennyT wrote:
The last time I went to Cahuilla I witnessed a young man lose his life while his father  held him in his arms. I can’t bring...

The last time I went to Cahuilla I witnessed a young man lose his life while his father  held him in his arms. I can’t bring myself to go back there again. How he crashed it could have happened at any track but that place seems cursed. Way too many life flights going in/out of that place 

Oh that had to be gut wrenching for you and devastating for the father.  

JM485
Posts
5824
Joined
10/1/2013
Location
Davis, CA, USA
5/18/2025 10:19pm Edited Date/Time 5/18/2025 10:21pm
So over the years it seems like jump faces have become less steep, the logic is to make them easier and safer, but what ends up...

So over the years it seems like jump faces have become less steep, the logic is to make them easier and safer, but what ends up happening is everyone hits the thing wide open, and then guys that have no business jumping at all end up dead sailoring every jump on the track, caseing it and side swapping. Another issue i see is that tracks are getting wider and wider and longer straight aways. Once again the logic is safety. but what ends up happening is higher speeds. I remember tracks like LACR and Gorman having a lot steeper jumps and shorter straights, and the tracks being narrower. Food for thought

JM485 wrote:
Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips...

Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips and somehow the injury rate is even higher.  Slow the tracks down, add some technical features, and stop making them flat freeways because this experiment clearly isn’t working.

TbonesPop wrote:
Longer, smoother, wider jump approaches make tracks safer because they lead to less acceleration bumps going into jumps - it's smoother and more predictable lines on...

Longer, smoother, wider jump approaches make tracks safer because they lead to less acceleration bumps going into jumps - it's smoother and more predictable lines on the approach, same with the jump faces - any jump situation where a rider can build speed into the jump is safer than requiring a rider to be hard on the gas going into the jump and through the jump. Riders have a choice on what speed to hit stuff at.   Having more "technical" steeper jump faces out of turns makes tracks less safe because less experienced riders can't safely build speed into them.  They accelerate hard out of the turn, usually sitting down, and try to seat bounce and the jump approached get nasty acceleration bumps which unsettle the bikes on the jump approach or the jumps develop kickers from everyone accelerating on the jump face. Same thing with the landings - if more technical requiring hard acceleration on landings to make the next obstacle, you get pot holes on the landings from guys landing with the throttle on hard. Smoother is safer when the track design is right.  Thinking that steeper more technical jumps will make a track safer is ridiculous. That's like saying Supercross is safer than Motocross (it's not).  If you want to "slow a track down" to be safer, add more TURNS and don't make the jumps so big, along with BIG gradual landings (not postage stamp landings).  Thing is (especially out west), more turns requires more track prep (fuel and time) and more water.  Jumps properly built (the ones that don't get acceleration bumps and nasty kickers on them) don't require as much water or fuel to rework them between ride days.

I highly disagree, and I think the data backs me up on this.  I don't think anyone can argue that tracks haven't gone more and more in the direction you're describing, yet the rate of serious injury seems to be going higher and higher year after year.  Like I said before, if this well intentioned experiment was working we wouldn't have a thread like this every week.

 

The things you're describing are exactly what keep less experienced riders from hitting jumps they aren't ready for yet, and now people have become so accustomed to these mellow approaches and lips that the second anything technical gets put in a track they have no idea what to do and you have carnage everywhere.  I'd much rather have a lot of technical 2-3 gear sections on a track than be in 4th gear for 50% of it, maybe I'm getting old but the high speed bomb runs just don't do it for me anymore.  Technical doesn't necessarily have to mean steep jumps, throw some switchbacks with berms or some decent sized rollers in the track every now and then if you want, something that makes you think a little bit and isn't just who can hold the throttle to the stops the longest.

7
2
Badd127
Posts
522
Joined
12/2/2016
Location
SE
5/19/2025 1:34am

In 2001 or 2002 at the Avalon supercross, near Melbourne Australia,  there were 17 people taken to hospital. 

And this was the reason Australia brought in a specific SX race licence.  Before this time anyone with a national motocross licence could enter and race supercross. 

An accredited coach would have to watch you ride a SX track and approve you.

wreckitrandy
Posts
4225
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Granite Falls, NC, USA
5/19/2025 8:49am

Lake Sugar Tree national in 1990 or '91. It was so hot and humid they stayed running hauling spectators to the hospital. I have no idea how many trips they made.

5/19/2025 9:00am
JM485 wrote:
Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips...

Nailed it.  I keep hearing about how we need to make tracks safer, now every local track is a glorified vet track with ski jump lips and somehow the injury rate is even higher.  Slow the tracks down, add some technical features, and stop making them flat freeways because this experiment clearly isn’t working.

TbonesPop wrote:
Longer, smoother, wider jump approaches make tracks safer because they lead to less acceleration bumps going into jumps - it's smoother and more predictable lines on...

Longer, smoother, wider jump approaches make tracks safer because they lead to less acceleration bumps going into jumps - it's smoother and more predictable lines on the approach, same with the jump faces - any jump situation where a rider can build speed into the jump is safer than requiring a rider to be hard on the gas going into the jump and through the jump. Riders have a choice on what speed to hit stuff at.   Having more "technical" steeper jump faces out of turns makes tracks less safe because less experienced riders can't safely build speed into them.  They accelerate hard out of the turn, usually sitting down, and try to seat bounce and the jump approached get nasty acceleration bumps which unsettle the bikes on the jump approach or the jumps develop kickers from everyone accelerating on the jump face. Same thing with the landings - if more technical requiring hard acceleration on landings to make the next obstacle, you get pot holes on the landings from guys landing with the throttle on hard. Smoother is safer when the track design is right.  Thinking that steeper more technical jumps will make a track safer is ridiculous. That's like saying Supercross is safer than Motocross (it's not).  If you want to "slow a track down" to be safer, add more TURNS and don't make the jumps so big, along with BIG gradual landings (not postage stamp landings).  Thing is (especially out west), more turns requires more track prep (fuel and time) and more water.  Jumps properly built (the ones that don't get acceleration bumps and nasty kickers on them) don't require as much water or fuel to rework them between ride days.

JM485 wrote:
I highly disagree, and I think the data backs me up on this.  I don't think anyone can argue that tracks haven't gone more and more...

I highly disagree, and I think the data backs me up on this.  I don't think anyone can argue that tracks haven't gone more and more in the direction you're describing, yet the rate of serious injury seems to be going higher and higher year after year.  Like I said before, if this well intentioned experiment was working we wouldn't have a thread like this every week.

 

The things you're describing are exactly what keep less experienced riders from hitting jumps they aren't ready for yet, and now people have become so accustomed to these mellow approaches and lips that the second anything technical gets put in a track they have no idea what to do and you have carnage everywhere.  I'd much rather have a lot of technical 2-3 gear sections on a track than be in 4th gear for 50% of it, maybe I'm getting old but the high speed bomb runs just don't do it for me anymore.  Technical doesn't necessarily have to mean steep jumps, throw some switchbacks with berms or some decent sized rollers in the track every now and then if you want, something that makes you think a little bit and isn't just who can hold the throttle to the stops the longest.

100% 

1
Mr. Afterbar
Posts
2425
Joined
5/13/2019
Location
Green Bay, WI, USA
5/19/2025 9:47am

Midwest racer here. I can’t recall the last time I’ve seen a helicopter. Well over a decade. And more than one ambulance ride in a day is a bad day. Most of the time we see none. 

50dippin
Posts
362
Joined
10/4/2009
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
5/19/2025 10:56am

Cahuilla is my favorite track and usually I'd say its relatively tame layout.  But nowadays there are too many people, the track prep/dirt just can't handle it, especially on the vet track.  Once the lips get chewed up its carnage city for the vet riders.  That one step up double in the middle of the track seems to take people out left and right, people either over clear it and land in the breaking bumps or case it and bounce, either way they end up whisky throttling over the berm.  Maybe they could make the lip steeper so people don't have to be going so fast to clear it or maybe do a mid day prep of the lips it would keep the less experienced guys from wadding.  

Also, since the vet track is so crowded a lot of guys end up going over to the main, which imo is pretty tame, but then just become dangerous for the fast guys.  

3
5/19/2025 11:47am
SoCalMX70 wrote:
450s, track prep, older riders not in proper shape, young riders throwing caution to the wind... Who knows. Probably a lot of factors at play these...

450s, track prep, older riders not in proper shape, young riders throwing caution to the wind... Who knows. Probably a lot of factors at play these days. It's an inherently dangerous sport that has seemingly only gotten more dangerous, but that is just a gut feeling. I can only directly tie that feeling into the development of the 450 4 stroke (heavier bike, more HP).

How's everyone going to fair on 80hp (equivalent) electric bikes, if they become the norm?

Edit: I'll also add that I'm going to be a lifer on my YZ250. I work out at least 4 days a week and take being in shape very seriously. Even then, I feel that I'm barely in enough shape to be ripping motos at any track. My "experiment" on a CRF450 3 years ago resulted in a ruptured ACL. Didn't crash, just dabbed a foot and was done for 11 months. Decided I didn't need that kind of torque going through my body... which is what happened. My YZ will stand up if I dab a foot, while the 450 just went through my leg. That alone is enough to keep me off those monsters.

Yep, I'm a YZ250 lifer as well coming from 350s.

philG
Posts
11180
Joined
5/12/2012
Location
GB
5/19/2025 1:16pm
A couple of years ago, Canada Heights uk, if I recall correctly there were 13 race starts and 10 of them were red flagged. The meeting was...

A couple of years ago, Canada Heights uk, if I recall correctly there were 13 race starts and 10 of them were red flagged. 

The meeting was abandoned due to the medical services having to leave the circuit with injured riders. 

Biggest issue is Ambulances going to hospital and not being able to offload due to ' improvements in the NHS' 

Only one red flag yesterday, not sure what occurred , but a marshall  was clipped , and they had to call the race to get to them, but they were ok, i dont they even left the track . 

 

Brent
Posts
5887
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
5/19/2025 2:01pm Edited Date/Time 5/19/2025 5:07pm

IMO, rider safety comes down to three things - confidence, fitness and talent. 

I'm not sure anyone should be blaming motocross tracks or high performance bikes for injuries.    

If you went snow skiing using high performance long skis, and got injured while trying to do a double diamond ski slope, is it the fault of the skis or the mountain, or is it your fault for not having the skills or fitness required for the task at hand ? 

I don't hear any complaints from skiers about making skis slower or ski hills easier. 

All you guys complaining that Moto is too extreme always have the option of Vintage clubs and races - guys come out with their older bikes and have a great time on tamed down tracks. they have a few clubs like this in my area.

for context,  I'm a vet rider who takes the sport and training for it very seriously,  and I feel most comfortable training and racing on a 450.

5
NicNak
Posts
1111
Joined
2/18/2019
Location
Palm Desert, CA, USA
5/19/2025 4:39pm

Anybody planning on riding cahuilla Wednesday?? I’m thinking it’s a move! 

Racerx930
Posts
775
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Stillwater, OK, USA
5/19/2025 4:54pm

I've been in the race track business for 14 years.   Over that time I've had 2 prior medi flights from facilities I've owned.  1 seemed COMPLETELY unnecessary but that's not my call.  The last 2 times I've been open for practice we had a medi flight land.   I think most people around would say my tracks one of the safer tracks around, just freak accidents both times.  But it sure feels like it's more and more common.  To the point where I rarely open anymore outside of the 3 or 4 events a year we schedule.

1

Post a reply to: What’s the most ambulances you’ve seen in a day…

The Latest