2025 Yamahas

gharmon
Posts
2767
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Valley, AL, USA
7/11/2024 9:21pm

When does Yamaha normally get their bikes to the dealers? I've only ever bought a new Honda and it was mid August when new model stuff came out. I know ktm came out super early a couple years ago. Yamaha 250f? 

bvm111
Posts
10185
Joined
7/1/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
7/11/2024 9:51pm

you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers and have decided to NOT build one. 

2
6
7/11/2024 11:52pm Edited Date/Time 7/12/2024 12:03am

I am really impressed with how Yamaha has been incorporating mid-gen updates for the last decade. We saw improvements on both of the two prior YZ-F platforms throughout their life, seemingly little stuff hinging on testing and feedback, but that added up to big swings in rider acceptance.

It seems like we are past an age where a company can throw a bunch of engineers at the product and see huge advancement. We have hit a point in MX bike development where testing and small changes (with engineering intimately involved) probably gets the biggest ROI when rubber hits soil, and Yamaha does seem to recognize that.

Leeham
Posts
1160
Joined
10/29/2018
Location
Rochester, WA, USA
7/12/2024 12:18am

I see they’ve relocated the foot pegs. Interesting, considering they changed peg location significantly from the last gen bike. Anybody know what direction they went?

I think they changed the shape, not location. I saw on a video on YT, the guy was talking about how bad the peg mounts were. You couldn't put your feet right next to frame, the mount would create a gap. 

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxVcVus-SIikTb07WJP1Q7ZasILystdUOX?si=ZlvuGI…

1

The Shop

Motofinne
Posts
11599
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
7/12/2024 12:42am
bvm111 wrote:
you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers...

you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers and have decided to NOT build one. 

The 350 platform is one of the bigges sellers in the KTM Group portfolio.

2
2
Village Idiot
Posts
2622
Joined
5/19/2023
Location
MXoN - a term used by newbs, goobs and rubes, PW, USA
7/12/2024 9:24pm
I am really impressed with how Yamaha has been incorporating mid-gen updates for the last decade. We saw improvements on both of the two prior YZ-F...

I am really impressed with how Yamaha has been incorporating mid-gen updates for the last decade. We saw improvements on both of the two prior YZ-F platforms throughout their life, seemingly little stuff hinging on testing and feedback, but that added up to big swings in rider acceptance.

It seems like we are past an age where a company can throw a bunch of engineers at the product and see huge advancement. We have hit a point in MX bike development where testing and small changes (with engineering intimately involved) probably gets the biggest ROI when rubber hits soil, and Yamaha does seem to recognize that.

IMO, we hit that point decades ago.

Refined, not redefined, has been the process for a loooooooong time.

vdrsnk04
Posts
2313
Joined
9/5/2018
Location
USA
7/13/2024 7:14am
bvm111 wrote:
you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers...

you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers and have decided to NOT build one. 

Motofinne wrote:

The 350 platform is one of the bigges sellers in the KTM Group portfolio.

Where is your data to back that claim? 

6
FGR01
Posts
6150
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
USA
Fantasy
10/24/2024 5:34am

Anyone pick up a 2025 YZ250F yet?  Have any feedback?

1
10/24/2024 5:39am
YZ125H1 wrote:
Agreed, the stock fender is so wide.

Agreed, the stock fender is so wide.

Rosso391 wrote:

I know! The front plate and fender bolt right up too. why not just sell it that way..

Luxon MX wrote:
It's a Yamaha thing. They could save A LOT of headache, time, and money if they updated a few things on the two strokes to match...

It's a Yamaha thing. They could save A LOT of headache, time, and money if they updated a few things on the two strokes to match the four strokes. But rather than take the small effort to do that, they take the easy route and keep things as they are.

It's maddening on our end with triple clamps. The four stroke clamps are different from the 125 two stroke clamps, which are different still from the 250 two stroke clamps. For us to offer two colors of clamps in two different offsets, it's only four different part numbers to cover the whole KTM/Husky/GasGas big bike off-road and motocross lineup. For Yamaha it's 12 different part numbers!

Just imagine if Yamaha made the two strokes with the 22mm triple clamp and the four stroke swingarm…

3
FGR01
Posts
6150
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
USA
Fantasy
10/28/2024 11:34pm Edited Date/Time 10/28/2024 11:36pm

Spoke with my wallet. 

IMG 7462
22
FGR01
Posts
6150
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
USA
Fantasy
11/5/2024 4:45am

Did a few days on the 2025 YZ250F.   Really like the stock suspension.  I did not touch a clicker yet.  The stock map was weak on the bottom and I found myself fanning the clutch.   Tried the Hard Hitting map and the Linear Torque map.  Settled on the Linear Torque.  Much better bottom and revs quickly and cleanly with impressive top end.  I was riding a tight track and had to use 2nd in basically every corner.  Would need to add a few teeth to make 3rd more usable on tighter tracks, if that's your preference.

2
1
McG194
Posts
4140
Joined
9/7/2017
Location
Palm Coast, FL, USA
11/5/2024 4:54am
bvm111 wrote:
you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers...

you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers and have decided to NOT build one. 

Marketing and accounting departments thought the Pontiac Aztek was a good idea. 

2
AH387
Posts
1705
Joined
8/29/2019
Location
Bridgeville, PA, USA
11/11/2024 4:45am

I'm not really in the market for a bike, but the '25 250FX is very intriguing to me. The main reason is, at my Plus 40 stage of life, I'm starting to get a little less sendy and have started to become a bit more interested in woods. My local MX track is doing a GP Series this coming year, which I'm considering doing a few. They used to just do 1 a year, and I would always try to do it. Also, a lot of tracks around here also have some sort of woods loop and I have been interested in riding them, here and there. The problem, my '21 YZ250F is absolutely terrible in the woods. The chassis feels so stiff, the engine is too abrupt etc. So the FX does seem like it could be a nice compromise. I think my biggest hang-up is my current bike is still pretty low hour and has some mods and is dialed. It's perfect for me on MX (only.) TD dual injector, peg relocation, WCL engine mounts - I love the older chassis etc. So I still spend most of my time on a MX track and I am afraid I would regret that move, once the honeymoon is over on the FX. But every review of that bike makes it seem like it could do it all and be competitive and fun. Tough call. I need to maybe soften my suspension to try and compromise, then turn the dial on my Vortex so that the 2nd map is a soft map. Maybe that will be enough to make me happy. If not, I might really be looking into that FX.

BoxcarWilly
Posts
1263
Joined
10/5/2023
Location
Thunder Bay, ON, CA
11/11/2024 8:16am
AH387 wrote:
I'm not really in the market for a bike, but the '25 250FX is very intriguing to me. The main reason is, at my Plus 40...

I'm not really in the market for a bike, but the '25 250FX is very intriguing to me. The main reason is, at my Plus 40 stage of life, I'm starting to get a little less sendy and have started to become a bit more interested in woods. My local MX track is doing a GP Series this coming year, which I'm considering doing a few. They used to just do 1 a year, and I would always try to do it. Also, a lot of tracks around here also have some sort of woods loop and I have been interested in riding them, here and there. The problem, my '21 YZ250F is absolutely terrible in the woods. The chassis feels so stiff, the engine is too abrupt etc. So the FX does seem like it could be a nice compromise. I think my biggest hang-up is my current bike is still pretty low hour and has some mods and is dialed. It's perfect for me on MX (only.) TD dual injector, peg relocation, WCL engine mounts - I love the older chassis etc. So I still spend most of my time on a MX track and I am afraid I would regret that move, once the honeymoon is over on the FX. But every review of that bike makes it seem like it could do it all and be competitive and fun. Tough call. I need to maybe soften my suspension to try and compromise, then turn the dial on my Vortex so that the 2nd map is a soft map. Maybe that will be enough to make me happy. If not, I might really be looking into that FX.

FWIW I had 2021, and 2023 250FXs and moved to a 2024 YZ250F for the new chassis this year. I did not enjoy the FX on the MX track. The suspension valving is too soft and the 18" wheel is like a boat anchor. I'm A/AA level, so maybe it's not as noticeable for C/B, but I had a hard time with it. 

 

The real solution here, is to get two bikes 👍

1
11/11/2024 8:27am Edited Date/Time 11/11/2024 8:28am
bvm111 wrote:
you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers...

you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers and have decided to NOT build one. 

McG194 wrote:

Marketing and accounting departments thought the Pontiac Aztek was a good idea. 

The design department thought the Aztek was a good idea. Marketing and accounting did what they could for as long as they had to. lol

 

11/11/2024 8:29am
Rosso391 wrote:

I know! The front plate and fender bolt right up too. why not just sell it that way..

Luxon MX wrote:
It's a Yamaha thing. They could save A LOT of headache, time, and money if they updated a few things on the two strokes to match...

It's a Yamaha thing. They could save A LOT of headache, time, and money if they updated a few things on the two strokes to match the four strokes. But rather than take the small effort to do that, they take the easy route and keep things as they are.

It's maddening on our end with triple clamps. The four stroke clamps are different from the 125 two stroke clamps, which are different still from the 250 two stroke clamps. For us to offer two colors of clamps in two different offsets, it's only four different part numbers to cover the whole KTM/Husky/GasGas big bike off-road and motocross lineup. For Yamaha it's 12 different part numbers!

Just imagine if Yamaha made the two strokes with the 22mm triple clamp and the four stroke swingarm…

They'd have sales that are roughly the same?

1
AH387
Posts
1705
Joined
8/29/2019
Location
Bridgeville, PA, USA
11/11/2024 9:57am
FWIW I had 2021, and 2023 250FXs and moved to a 2024 YZ250F for the new chassis this year. I did not enjoy the FX on...

FWIW I had 2021, and 2023 250FXs and moved to a 2024 YZ250F for the new chassis this year. I did not enjoy the FX on the MX track. The suspension valving is too soft and the 18" wheel is like a boat anchor. I'm A/AA level, so maybe it's not as noticeable for C/B, but I had a hard time with it. 

 

The real solution here, is to get two bikes 👍

Thanks for the input. Yeah, I'm not wanting to really compromise a significant amount on MX. I just want the bike to also be decent for woods sections (nothing like super tight or gnarly.) Maybe I let the reviews paint a picture of the new 250FX that is a little more versatile than it really is. Or just new bike hype getting to me a bit, not sure.

I would like to just add an FX to the line up but already have several bikes that each serve a purpose. So the only choice would be to replace the '21 with a '25 FX. And I really wouldn't want to do that unless I was positive it was the right move. Maybe I'll have to demo one.  But your experience sounds logical and what I would be afraid of. 

mxrose3
Posts
2379
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Delmar, DE, USA
11/11/2024 2:07pm

I see they’ve relocated the foot pegs. Interesting, considering they changed peg location significantly from the last gen bike. Anybody know what direction they went?

Leeham wrote:
I think they changed the shape, not location. I saw on a video on YT, the guy was talking about how bad the peg mounts were...

I think they changed the shape, not location. I saw on a video on YT, the guy was talking about how bad the peg mounts were. You couldn't put your feet right next to frame, the mount would create a gap. 

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxVcVus-SIikTb07WJP1Q7ZasILystdUOX?si=ZlvuGI…

In '23, the position of the pegs were 5mm lower than the previous gen, and the seat height was 5mm taller.   This made for a 10mm roomier platform between your feet and rear end.   Much better for taller guys.

FGR01
Posts
6150
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
USA
Fantasy
11/11/2024 4:58pm
bvm111 wrote:
you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers...

you guys pontificating that other manufacturers should build 350s ever think that they have marketing and accounting DEPARTMENTS that have already looked at the actual numbers and have decided to NOT build one. 

McG194 wrote:

Marketing and accounting departments thought the Pontiac Aztek was a good idea. 

The design department thought the Aztek was a good idea. Marketing and accounting did what they could for as long as they had to. lol

 

Yes, I remember their marketing slogan.  The Pontiac Ass-tech.  With butt-ass ugly technology.

1
11/12/2024 3:33am
Luxon MX wrote:
It's a Yamaha thing. They could save A LOT of headache, time, and money if they updated a few things on the two strokes to match...

It's a Yamaha thing. They could save A LOT of headache, time, and money if they updated a few things on the two strokes to match the four strokes. But rather than take the small effort to do that, they take the easy route and keep things as they are.

It's maddening on our end with triple clamps. The four stroke clamps are different from the 125 two stroke clamps, which are different still from the 250 two stroke clamps. For us to offer two colors of clamps in two different offsets, it's only four different part numbers to cover the whole KTM/Husky/GasGas big bike off-road and motocross lineup. For Yamaha it's 12 different part numbers!

Just imagine if Yamaha made the two strokes with the 22mm triple clamp and the four stroke swingarm…

They'd have sales that are roughly the same?

I would say they would be better but probably not a ton more. I think people would be happy to see a solid update like that

Post a reply to: 2025 Yamahas

The Latest