Alternative healing methods

4/13/2024 6:27am Edited Date/Time 4/13/2024 6:51am
Right. The only thing I'll agree with that he said is there are a lot of fake peptides out there. If you don't think they work...

Right. The only thing I'll agree with that he said is there are a lot of fake peptides out there. If you don't think they work, I'd suggest you got bunk peptides

They don’t work even in clinical trials. Regression to the mean is the norm here. Telling people to take unregulated and potentially risky things without good...

They don’t work even in clinical trials. Regression to the mean is the norm here. Telling people to take unregulated and potentially risky things without good evidence is ill advised. 
 

if they worked so well, they’d be getting funded for additional trials to be brought to market. They didn’t and they aren’t, but people on the internet will believe (and buy) anything. 

I'm not going to get into a back and forth over this other than to say they worked for me. Incredibly well as a matter of...

I'm not going to get into a back and forth over this other than to say they worked for me. Incredibly well as a matter of fact. Somwhat humorous several people in here have said they work from personal experience and youre like nah ah. I'm not telling anyone what to put in their own body either. Just relaying personal experience. 

The “it worked for me” gambit, also known as the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is well described in alternative medicine.

Whether or not something reliably works has to be proven through studies on many individuals, in addition to establishing safety data, proper dosing, and so on. Many patients have a positive belief in these agents and similar ones, but that doesn’t mean they’re safe or that they work.  

Last time you posted about these unproven agents, I provided evidence showing your claims were not based in reality- that on average, neither bpc or tb improve outcomes reliably. I do not think you are likely to change your mind, but that’s not really the point. You’re an adult and can do what you want. Advising other people to make poor decisions with no expertise in the field is a problem, however. 0/10 would not recommend. 

7
3
4/13/2024 6:31am Edited Date/Time 4/13/2024 6:40am

Bpc157 and tb500 work from my personal experience 

Mike 13 wrote:

Second this, used after rotator cuff surgery with awesome results and zero side effects. 

studworx wrote:

Not possible. Jordan with absolutely zero experience is telling everyone in here with experience that they don’t work 

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on. It is far more likely that the positive expectations and regression to the mean led to the outcome, as this is well documented in similar treatments. Since you’re so absolutely sure, I would recommend a job in pharma working in the PR department. You can tell people that something works despite the evidence to the contrary. When people ask for proof, just say it worked for me! 

It’s like saying the suspension change your mechanic told you he made really worked well in the second moto, but he didn’t actually do anything other than tell you he did.

I work in this field, have managed dozens of induces who have played around with these agents, have published reviews, and so on, but sure, you guys probably know more about this than I do 😂

8
3
sandman768
Posts
8118
Joined
3/21/2014
Location
Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
4/13/2024 6:40am Edited Date/Time 4/13/2024 6:54am

BPC-157……..Where are you guys getting this stuff? Pretty big price differences? Assume pill form? Haha…. My wife has a collagen peptide supplement she takes..😂

Chris_Buehler
Posts
8446
Joined
7/21/2019
Location
PORTLAND, CT, USA
4/13/2024 6:44am
They don’t work even in clinical trials. Regression to the mean is the norm here. Telling people to take unregulated and potentially risky things without good...

They don’t work even in clinical trials. Regression to the mean is the norm here. Telling people to take unregulated and potentially risky things without good evidence is ill advised. 
 

if they worked so well, they’d be getting funded for additional trials to be brought to market. They didn’t and they aren’t, but people on the internet will believe (and buy) anything. 

I'm not going to get into a back and forth over this other than to say they worked for me. Incredibly well as a matter of...

I'm not going to get into a back and forth over this other than to say they worked for me. Incredibly well as a matter of fact. Somwhat humorous several people in here have said they work from personal experience and youre like nah ah. I'm not telling anyone what to put in their own body either. Just relaying personal experience. 

The “it worked for me” gambit, also known as the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is well described in alternative medicine. Whether or not something...

The “it worked for me” gambit, also known as the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is well described in alternative medicine.

Whether or not something reliably works has to be proven through studies on many individuals, in addition to establishing safety data, proper dosing, and so on. Many patients have a positive belief in these agents and similar ones, but that doesn’t mean they’re safe or that they work.  

Last time you posted about these unproven agents, I provided evidence showing your claims were not based in reality- that on average, neither bpc or tb improve outcomes reliably. I do not think you are likely to change your mind, but that’s not really the point. You’re an adult and can do what you want. Advising other people to make poor decisions with no expertise in the field is a problem, however. 0/10 would not recommend. 

Cool man. Nothing you're saying changes the results I got. And, again, pretty sure I didn't advise any adults what they should put in their bodies. I spoke about my experience. They can use that information however they like. Have a good one. Race day

6
4

The Shop

JazzyJJ
Posts
1825
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
Nunya, WY, USA
4/13/2024 7:06am
sandman768 wrote:

BPC-157……..Where are you guys getting this stuff? Pretty big price differences? Assume pill form? Haha…. My wife has a collagen peptide supplement she takes..😂

Needs to be injected sub Q, oral dosage doesn’t work.

rbm33
Posts
457
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Duncan, OK, USA
Fantasy
4/13/2024 7:06am

BPC-157 and TB-500

Exactly what Chris said.

3
JazzyJJ
Posts
1825
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
Nunya, WY, USA
4/13/2024 7:10am
Mike 13 wrote:

Second this, used after rotator cuff surgery with awesome results and zero side effects. 

studworx wrote:

Not possible. Jordan with absolutely zero experience is telling everyone in here with experience that they don’t work 

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on...

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on. It is far more likely that the positive expectations and regression to the mean led to the outcome, as this is well documented in similar treatments. Since you’re so absolutely sure, I would recommend a job in pharma working in the PR department. You can tell people that something works despite the evidence to the contrary. When people ask for proof, just say it worked for me! 

It’s like saying the suspension change your mechanic told you he made really worked well in the second moto, but he didn’t actually do anything other than tell you he did.

I work in this field, have managed dozens of induces who have played around with these agents, have published reviews, and so on, but sure, you guys probably know more about this than I do 😂

Just stop. If you wanted to actually bring a valid point against bpc 157 you could point out the lack of studies in human trials, not the non sense that you’re espousing over and over. Your claims that the pharma industry and science would market something that works are laughable. Drug companies are now trying to get placebos OUT of depression drug clinical trials because they work as good or better than their garbage SSRIs and you want to blindly trust these people? Good luck out there 

2
3
mvd61
Posts
1260
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD, USA
4/13/2024 7:15am
studworx wrote:

PRP, Peptides 

Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence.  “Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline...

Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence. 

“Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline for decades. This includes BPC 157 and TB500. The majority of people buying this stuff aren’t even getting what they think they’re taking. 

PRP has a pretty low  success rate in the few things it actually “works” for, eg chronic tendinopathy. 

The Carnivore diet would be about the last diet to recommend for an athlete. 

Treatment of injuries depends on the specific injury  and the individual. Many people advocate for unproven interventions without understanding the potentials risks or knowledge of the average response. 

Bpc157 and tb500 work from my personal experience 

Same here. I had great results with bpc. 

3
4/13/2024 7:18am Edited Date/Time 4/13/2024 7:20am
studworx wrote:

Not possible. Jordan with absolutely zero experience is telling everyone in here with experience that they don’t work 

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on...

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on. It is far more likely that the positive expectations and regression to the mean led to the outcome, as this is well documented in similar treatments. Since you’re so absolutely sure, I would recommend a job in pharma working in the PR department. You can tell people that something works despite the evidence to the contrary. When people ask for proof, just say it worked for me! 

It’s like saying the suspension change your mechanic told you he made really worked well in the second moto, but he didn’t actually do anything other than tell you he did.

I work in this field, have managed dozens of induces who have played around with these agents, have published reviews, and so on, but sure, you guys probably know more about this than I do 😂

JazzyJJ wrote:
Just stop. If you wanted to actually bring a valid point against bpc 157 you could point out the lack of studies in human trials, not...

Just stop. If you wanted to actually bring a valid point against bpc 157 you could point out the lack of studies in human trials, not the non sense that you’re espousing over and over. Your claims that the pharma industry and science would market something that works are laughable. Drug companies are now trying to get placebos OUT of depression drug clinical trials because they work as good or better than their garbage SSRIs and you want to blindly trust these people? Good luck out there 

I did point out there is little human data and that those existing data do not show benefit.

Yes, the industry would absolutely fund an efficacious agent to bring to market. Your argument actually supports this claim, as they’re willing to fund medications that don’t work that well, but do provide a demonstrable effect. Btw, SSRI’s do have a modest effect in a number of indications.

This thread is pretty wild though. I didn’t know vital had so many doctors and clinical researchers, in addition the voluntary lab rats  who will ingest or inject themselves with unknown substances. 😂

3
4
endurox
Posts
2095
Joined
3/22/2014
Location
Garden City, ID, USA
4/13/2024 7:20am
oldman59 wrote:
I had a thoracic Laminectomy on December 28th and still recovering. It can take up to a year to recover. I still have some numbness in...

I had a thoracic Laminectomy on December 28th and still recovering. It can take up to a year to recover. I still have some numbness in my legs and feet and weakness. I would be willing to try just about anything to help with recovery. I hope that by November/December I can ride a dirt bike again and snow ski. The recovery has caused a lot of anxiety and depression that I won’t get better. 

cryo therapy has helped many people with healing. Much more effective than an ice bath.

1
mvd61
Posts
1260
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD, USA
4/13/2024 7:22am
studworx wrote:
Not sure what the science is. Don’t care either. Maybe it’s placebo.. but I have had a TON of injuries from being on the Olympic practice...

Not sure what the science is. Don’t care either. Maybe it’s placebo.. but I have had a TON of injuries from being on the Olympic practice squad and from MX prior to trying PRP and peptides, and then have had tons of injuries that I used them and every single time I had a much faster, better recovery and comeback after using. Not up for debate from my experience for me personally. 
 

Not to mention the other guys in this thread that have also used and experienced a benefit… so far a 100% success rate in here from first hand experience users. 

Right. The only thing I'll agree with that he said is there are a lot of fake peptides out there. If you don't think they work...

Right. The only thing I'll agree with that he said is there are a lot of fake peptides out there. If you don't think they work, I'd suggest you got bunk peptides

They don’t work even in clinical trials. Regression to the mean is the norm here. Telling people to take unregulated and potentially risky things without good...

They don’t work even in clinical trials. Regression to the mean is the norm here. Telling people to take unregulated and potentially risky things without good evidence is ill advised. 
 

if they worked so well, they’d be getting funded for additional trials to be brought to market. They didn’t and they aren’t, but people on the internet will believe (and buy) anything. 

Yeah like a certain vaccine that was recently forced on many. Instead of talking down to us why don’t you elaborate on which practices your clinic utilizes? 

5
5
mvd61
Posts
1260
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD, USA
4/13/2024 7:26am

Bpc157 and tb500 work from my personal experience 

Mike 13 wrote:

Second this, used after rotator cuff surgery with awesome results and zero side effects. 

studworx wrote:

Not possible. Jordan with absolutely zero experience is telling everyone in here with experience that they don’t work 

Pretty sure he works for or is an or the owner of Barbell Medicine. Months ago I posted about how well Marek has done for me and he shit talked them. My coach with marek was rather surprised and disappointed as he was a former client of Barbell Medicine himself and was happy with their protocols. 

2
1
JazzyJJ
Posts
1825
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
Nunya, WY, USA
4/13/2024 7:31am
It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on...

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on. It is far more likely that the positive expectations and regression to the mean led to the outcome, as this is well documented in similar treatments. Since you’re so absolutely sure, I would recommend a job in pharma working in the PR department. You can tell people that something works despite the evidence to the contrary. When people ask for proof, just say it worked for me! 

It’s like saying the suspension change your mechanic told you he made really worked well in the second moto, but he didn’t actually do anything other than tell you he did.

I work in this field, have managed dozens of induces who have played around with these agents, have published reviews, and so on, but sure, you guys probably know more about this than I do 😂

JazzyJJ wrote:
Just stop. If you wanted to actually bring a valid point against bpc 157 you could point out the lack of studies in human trials, not...

Just stop. If you wanted to actually bring a valid point against bpc 157 you could point out the lack of studies in human trials, not the non sense that you’re espousing over and over. Your claims that the pharma industry and science would market something that works are laughable. Drug companies are now trying to get placebos OUT of depression drug clinical trials because they work as good or better than their garbage SSRIs and you want to blindly trust these people? Good luck out there 

I did point out there is little human data and that those existing data do not show benefit. Yes, the industry would absolutely fund an efficacious...

I did point out there is little human data and that those existing data do not show benefit.

Yes, the industry would absolutely fund an efficacious agent to bring to market. Your argument actually supports this claim, as they’re willing to fund medications that don’t work that well, but do provide a demonstrable effect. Btw, SSRI’s do have a modest effect in a number of indications.

This thread is pretty wild though. I didn’t know vital had so many doctors and clinical researchers, in addition the voluntary lab rats  who will ingest or inject themselves with unknown substances. 😂

You can’t really be serious here right? If you are, I’ll just stop even trying. Drug companies push exactly what they can make the most money off of. If something is effective but can’t be patented, they block it and move on. This has been shown time and again.

What’s your angle here? Trying to prove that you’re smarter than everyone or something? Just find something else to do

3
3
Kelz87
Posts
1348
Joined
7/21/2018
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Fantasy
4/13/2024 7:35am
Mike 13 wrote:

Second this, used after rotator cuff surgery with awesome results and zero side effects. 

studworx wrote:

Not possible. Jordan with absolutely zero experience is telling everyone in here with experience that they don’t work 

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on...

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on. It is far more likely that the positive expectations and regression to the mean led to the outcome, as this is well documented in similar treatments. Since you’re so absolutely sure, I would recommend a job in pharma working in the PR department. You can tell people that something works despite the evidence to the contrary. When people ask for proof, just say it worked for me! 

It’s like saying the suspension change your mechanic told you he made really worked well in the second moto, but he didn’t actually do anything other than tell you he did.

I work in this field, have managed dozens of induces who have played around with these agents, have published reviews, and so on, but sure, you guys probably know more about this than I do 😂

But you’re saying that it “doesn’t work” because there hasn’t been a comparison group?
 

Peptides absolutely work, there’s visible evidence with people who use MT2 to increase melanin and their skin tans. Also, athletes using performance peptides have “shut down” T production when coming off cycle similar to users who take AAS

 

The questionable aspects are long term effects, and product quality 

2
1
Flatliner
Posts
4224
Joined
11/3/2009
Location
CA
4/13/2024 7:53am

I personally recover much faster on trt.

2
Electromoran
Posts
494
Joined
11/6/2023
Location
Edinboro, PA, USA
4/13/2024 8:19am

My elliptical machine was the best treatment I had when I blew my 2 bottom discs out. I couldn't use it right away, but if I didn't use it I would feel significantly worse the next day for 2 or 3 months.

Basically "movement is medicine" kept coming out of my physical therapist and personal trainer's mouths. Recovered in half the time.

3
studworx
Posts
835
Joined
1/24/2022
Location
Canada, QC, CA
4/13/2024 8:46am Edited Date/Time 4/13/2024 8:46am
It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on...

It’s funny that people think “it worked” with no comparison group, verification of the agent used, testing of blood levels of the agent, and so on. It is far more likely that the positive expectations and regression to the mean led to the outcome, as this is well documented in similar treatments. Since you’re so absolutely sure, I would recommend a job in pharma working in the PR department. You can tell people that something works despite the evidence to the contrary. When people ask for proof, just say it worked for me! 

It’s like saying the suspension change your mechanic told you he made really worked well in the second moto, but he didn’t actually do anything other than tell you he did.

I work in this field, have managed dozens of induces who have played around with these agents, have published reviews, and so on, but sure, you guys probably know more about this than I do 😂

JazzyJJ wrote:
Just stop. If you wanted to actually bring a valid point against bpc 157 you could point out the lack of studies in human trials, not...

Just stop. If you wanted to actually bring a valid point against bpc 157 you could point out the lack of studies in human trials, not the non sense that you’re espousing over and over. Your claims that the pharma industry and science would market something that works are laughable. Drug companies are now trying to get placebos OUT of depression drug clinical trials because they work as good or better than their garbage SSRIs and you want to blindly trust these people? Good luck out there 

I did point out there is little human data and that those existing data do not show benefit. Yes, the industry would absolutely fund an efficacious...

I did point out there is little human data and that those existing data do not show benefit.

Yes, the industry would absolutely fund an efficacious agent to bring to market. Your argument actually supports this claim, as they’re willing to fund medications that don’t work that well, but do provide a demonstrable effect. Btw, SSRI’s do have a modest effect in a number of indications.

This thread is pretty wild though. I didn’t know vital had so many doctors and clinical researchers, in addition the voluntary lab rats  who will ingest or inject themselves with unknown substances. 😂

"This thread is pretty wild though. I didn’t know vital had so many doctors and clinical researchers, in addition the voluntary lab rats  who will ingest or inject themselves with unknown substances."

I utilized the Olympic doctors advice as I mentioned, and had great results. When I was an Olympic prospect I didn't see Barbell Medicine listed in any of the resources we were utilizing. Mostly just world renowned sports medicine doctors. Not MD's that run a brand they want to push on a Motocross forum.

Please research Dr Ken Trinh as this is who we directly utilized at that time for the Canadian Olympic Boxing team. We also worked with Dr Galea a ton during those years (Yes, Tiger Woods personal doctor). Did they contact you during that time?

1
1
brocster
Posts
4564
Joined
6/9/2009
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
4/13/2024 8:54am
I'm not going to get into a back and forth over this other than to say they worked for me. Incredibly well as a matter of...

I'm not going to get into a back and forth over this other than to say they worked for me. Incredibly well as a matter of fact. Somwhat humorous several people in here have said they work from personal experience and youre like nah ah. I'm not telling anyone what to put in their own body either. Just relaying personal experience. 

The “it worked for me” gambit, also known as the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is well described in alternative medicine. Whether or not something...

The “it worked for me” gambit, also known as the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is well described in alternative medicine.

Whether or not something reliably works has to be proven through studies on many individuals, in addition to establishing safety data, proper dosing, and so on. Many patients have a positive belief in these agents and similar ones, but that doesn’t mean they’re safe or that they work.  

Last time you posted about these unproven agents, I provided evidence showing your claims were not based in reality- that on average, neither bpc or tb improve outcomes reliably. I do not think you are likely to change your mind, but that’s not really the point. You’re an adult and can do what you want. Advising other people to make poor decisions with no expertise in the field is a problem, however. 0/10 would not recommend. 

Cool man. Nothing you're saying changes the results I got. And, again, pretty sure I didn't advise any adults what they should put in their bodies...

Cool man. Nothing you're saying changes the results I got. And, again, pretty sure I didn't advise any adults what they should put in their bodies. I spoke about my experience. They can use that information however they like. Have a good one. Race day

I agree with Chris and not going to debate or argue about.  It’s factual the PRP worked for me and the ~5 or so other “snake oil” treatments didn’t and I had the same mindset going in with each.  I would have loved and wanted the $45 “magic dust XXX” cream to help me but it didn’t and  an actual procedure with natural/normal healing properties at hyper concentrated levels did. Simple as that  

Studies involve human interaction and from that point forward from both Dr and patient interpretation can be skewed as well as the aggregate. 

 

4
1
OwenJakes
Posts
1777
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY, USA
4/13/2024 9:00am
Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence.  “Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline...

Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence. 

“Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline for decades. This includes BPC 157 and TB500. The majority of people buying this stuff aren’t even getting what they think they’re taking. 

PRP has a pretty low  success rate in the few things it actually “works” for, eg chronic tendinopathy. 

The Carnivore diet would be about the last diet to recommend for an athlete. 

Treatment of injuries depends on the specific injury  and the individual. Many people advocate for unproven interventions without understanding the potentials risks or knowledge of the average response. 

OwenJakes wrote:
I will second this in two ways. First, most peptides and/or sarms are non-controlled and regulated substances so theres no QC particularly. Do with that what...

I will second this in two ways.

First, most peptides and/or sarms are non-controlled and regulated substances so theres no QC particularly. Do with that what you will.

Second, any kind of low carb diet has been a nightmare for me athletically. Sure, I lost a little water weight. I also lost the ability to train with any intensity (which is what is therapeutic in the first place).

I would advise a good physical therapist who is not into all of the pagan spiritual stuff indigo is talking about. Movement is medicine and it can be greatly supplemented with proper diet. If you're looking for an esoteric magic bullet, it's not out there.

JazzyJJ wrote:

One of the best long distance runners in the world is carnivore /low carb. It may not work for you, but it can work

I hear that like a broken record. ONE dude lol. Anomalies get filtered out of data sets. 

5
OwenJakes
Posts
1777
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY, USA
4/13/2024 9:08am

"I healed up while taking this something alongside other things" is a LOT different than "This substance works by this mechanic". If you cannot see the nuance in this I am sorry.

This is like armchair medicine meets redneck methodology. Tell me you haven't been to college without telling me you haven't been to college.

6
4/13/2024 9:22am
My elliptical machine was the best treatment I had when I blew my 2 bottom discs out. I couldn't use it right away, but if I...

My elliptical machine was the best treatment I had when I blew my 2 bottom discs out. I couldn't use it right away, but if I didn't use it I would feel significantly worse the next day for 2 or 3 months.

Basically "movement is medicine" kept coming out of my physical therapist and personal trainer's mouths. Recovered in half the time.

Yeah movement helps. I tore my rotator cuff & bicep tendon numerous times. After a few months when I can lift it. I do 12.5 lb barbell curls in diff directions and the pain goes away. The pain management programs r a money grab. No pain killers but pt and numerous injections. Sometimes the body is beyond repair. Mentally you can block a lot out. But only some you get wore out from being in pain all the time. 

1
captmoto
Posts
5878
Joined
4/22/2009
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
4/13/2024 10:24am
sandman768 wrote:
I don’t know about you guys…. But when I”m busted up and laying on the couch, I get a little depressed….how do I get this positive...

I don’t know about you guys…. But when I”m busted up and laying on the couch, I get a little depressed….how do I get this positive energy? 

If it is an isolated injury, get up and do something with the unaffected body parts. If it is ribs, shoulder and wrist type multiple injury, you're kind of stuck. I always try to get some kind of PT if a doctor is involved. Having someone to help get the affected body part moving correctly helps my head out since you have a goal.

2
captmoto
Posts
5878
Joined
4/22/2009
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
4/13/2024 10:38am
studworx wrote:

PRP, Peptides 

Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence.  “Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline...

Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence. 

“Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline for decades. This includes BPC 157 and TB500. The majority of people buying this stuff aren’t even getting what they think they’re taking. 

PRP has a pretty low  success rate in the few things it actually “works” for, eg chronic tendinopathy. 

The Carnivore diet would be about the last diet to recommend for an athlete. 

Treatment of injuries depends on the specific injury  and the individual. Many people advocate for unproven interventions without understanding the potentials risks or knowledge of the average response. 

studworx wrote:
Not sure what the science is. Don’t care either. Maybe it’s placebo.. but I have had a TON of injuries from being on the Olympic practice...

Not sure what the science is. Don’t care either. Maybe it’s placebo.. but I have had a TON of injuries from being on the Olympic practice squad and from MX prior to trying PRP and peptides, and then have had tons of injuries that I used them and every single time I had a much faster, better recovery and comeback after using. Not up for debate from my experience for me personally. 
 

Not to mention the other guys in this thread that have also used and experienced a benefit… so far a 100% success rate in here from first hand experience users. 

From a sample of 3. Being an old guy and discussing health issues with other old guys I've come to see that not everything works for everyone all the time. Having said that, I would give it a try if I was injured, what's the worst that could happen? I know lots of people with orthopedic injuries, knees and shoulders particularly. Synvisc injections are all over the place from "don't bother" to worked miracles". Gabapentin for back pain "don't do it, it will kill you" to "I can walk without pain again". This is a really huge case of YMMV.

I am a really big fan of focused, quality physical therapy.

studworx
Posts
835
Joined
1/24/2022
Location
Canada, QC, CA
4/13/2024 10:43am
Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence.  “Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline...

Neither of these reliably work for most musculoskeletal injuries based on available evidence. 

“Peptides” have effectively no evidence for efficacy, despite being in the development pipeline for decades. This includes BPC 157 and TB500. The majority of people buying this stuff aren’t even getting what they think they’re taking. 

PRP has a pretty low  success rate in the few things it actually “works” for, eg chronic tendinopathy. 

The Carnivore diet would be about the last diet to recommend for an athlete. 

Treatment of injuries depends on the specific injury  and the individual. Many people advocate for unproven interventions without understanding the potentials risks or knowledge of the average response. 

studworx wrote:
Not sure what the science is. Don’t care either. Maybe it’s placebo.. but I have had a TON of injuries from being on the Olympic practice...

Not sure what the science is. Don’t care either. Maybe it’s placebo.. but I have had a TON of injuries from being on the Olympic practice squad and from MX prior to trying PRP and peptides, and then have had tons of injuries that I used them and every single time I had a much faster, better recovery and comeback after using. Not up for debate from my experience for me personally. 
 

Not to mention the other guys in this thread that have also used and experienced a benefit… so far a 100% success rate in here from first hand experience users. 

captmoto wrote:
From a sample of 3. Being an old guy and discussing health issues with other old guys I've come to see that not everything works for...

From a sample of 3. Being an old guy and discussing health issues with other old guys I've come to see that not everything works for everyone all the time. Having said that, I would give it a try if I was injured, what's the worst that could happen? I know lots of people with orthopedic injuries, knees and shoulders particularly. Synvisc injections are all over the place from "don't bother" to worked miracles". Gabapentin for back pain "don't do it, it will kill you" to "I can walk without pain again". This is a really huge case of YMMV.

I am a really big fan of focused, quality physical therapy.

Again my information and experience comes from being an Olympic prospect getting the care and treatment from the top sports medicine doctors in the world lol

3
sandman768
Posts
8118
Joined
3/21/2014
Location
Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
4/13/2024 10:54am
captmoto wrote:
If it is an isolated injury, get up and do something with the unaffected body parts. If it is ribs, shoulder and wrist type multiple injury...

If it is an isolated injury, get up and do something with the unaffected body parts. If it is ribs, shoulder and wrist type multiple injury, you're kind of stuck. I always try to get some kind of PT if a doctor is involved. Having someone to help get the affected body part moving correctly helps my head out since you have a goal.

Agreed… big proponent of movement for rehab..I use a Schwann airdyne as my base for rehab, warmups and getting the blood flowing…currently dealing with knee, wrist issues and a concussion, it’s only been a few weeks…old guys don’t heal up like we used to….

4/13/2024 11:07am

I knew an Indian medicine women about 15 yrs ago.  I never had the chance to give it a try. I just had a few weeks of injections. That’s what they do now. 80 needles poked in you. 

2
4/13/2024 11:12am

Work injuries that’s an easy 900k. Injection clinics or the hospital is full of people that worked physical jobs.  I literally don’t hv a single part of my body that’s not injured or destroyed. And that’s just life. 

2
wvumounty
Posts
359
Joined
10/2/2018
Location
Butler, PA, USA
4/13/2024 11:26am

Some people like to crack their knuckles, neck or back. If you think it helps, that is all that matters. Positive thinking is powerful.

1
onefiveight
Posts
322
Joined
7/25/2016
Location
Citrus Heights, CA, USA
4/13/2024 11:27am

Ayahuasca and stem cells 

1
2
JazzyJJ
Posts
1825
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
Nunya, WY, USA
4/13/2024 11:55am
OwenJakes wrote:
I will second this in two ways. First, most peptides and/or sarms are non-controlled and regulated substances so theres no QC particularly. Do with that what...

I will second this in two ways.

First, most peptides and/or sarms are non-controlled and regulated substances so theres no QC particularly. Do with that what you will.

Second, any kind of low carb diet has been a nightmare for me athletically. Sure, I lost a little water weight. I also lost the ability to train with any intensity (which is what is therapeutic in the first place).

I would advise a good physical therapist who is not into all of the pagan spiritual stuff indigo is talking about. Movement is medicine and it can be greatly supplemented with proper diet. If you're looking for an esoteric magic bullet, it's not out there.

JazzyJJ wrote:

One of the best long distance runners in the world is carnivore /low carb. It may not work for you, but it can work

OwenJakes wrote:

I hear that like a broken record. ONE dude lol. Anomalies get filtered out of data sets. 

There's plenty of elite athletes doing very well on a meat based diet. 

It's funny when people like you pop up and talk shit on something that has no effect on you. 

 

Here, let me google that for you

https://www.google.com/search?q=all+meat+diet+athlete&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS1…

3
1

Post a reply to: Alternative healing methods

The Latest