Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
I did testing with them last year.
The watch with a single GPS radio is not accurate as the dual XGPS 160. Polar is a great product, and It does work, but if you are trying to get better lap times, the 5 to 10 percent variance in times between Polar alone versus Polar linking with the XGPS is kind of huge.
With sports that have high rates of acceleration and speed like motor racing, and quick changes in direction, the single GPS devices have a hard time providing accurate data.
One more Sports Profile was also added.
What stops the GPS from being sampled at a higher frequency?
(FWIW, I spent a lot of time designing and building in sensor world for my PhD dissertation and have a genuine interest but never played w GPS units)
Polar does a pretty good job by itself considering that it is such a small device, but it has limitations in accuracy on a motocross track when it records speed and lap tmes. Lit Pro tells you this in on their site.
When you combine data from both devices you get a really accurate picture of exactly what your lap times are, and what lines to take, as well as accurate HR data. Lit Pro even suggests what lines to take to lower your lap times based on the XGPS data.
But if somebody just wants general lap times and heart rate info, then the Polar by itself is a great choice.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
According to Dual, the XGPS160 is operating at 10Hz.
https://www.dualgpssolutions.com/explore-by-product/xgps160
I'm no engineer, nor am I a GPS expert. All I know is that I was told that the Single radio GPS watches were not up to the task for producing accurate data for track position and speed for rapid directional and speed changes. They are not designed for GPS use in Motorsports.
I can look at the data from just my Polar watch on Lit Pro, and I can see the data from the XGPS unit next to it.
The XGPS data is much more accurate than just the watch data.
This is how I understood it a few years ago. Maybe they have relaxed this regulation and they are more capable now? I have a M400 and a M600 . The M600 seems to eat battery life and is somewhat finicky compared to the workhorse 400...is there a better upgrade I should be looking at in the Polar line?
https://support.polar.com/en/export-training-sessions-flow
A TCX or GPX contains a time stamp and your GEO locations (latitude/longitude). It's the raw GPS data that is input to LitPro, MXBuddy, CrossBox, etc... So if you put that file into a reader you see your exact GPS positions at the exact times. Not what LitPro or CrossBox shows you (they try to "correct" these files).
There are tons of free apps/software that will allow you to open these files. Even websites https://www.gpsvisualizer.com/
Then you said you're not going to buy a Polar because they didn't immediately answer your question, which is par for your course.
Pit Row
That said, I was have a friend who's job is to develop bank security software and had a question or two about the software polar uses. His exact questions are:
"1. What is the operating system the watch is developed from and uses (e.g. Linux, android, iOS, Microsoft)?
2. Does the watch have all features and services when paired with an iPhone?"
The first question is one I'm curious about as well.
Any info is appreciated!
#1 This is a global question, something not really discussed, this link might help. https://support.polar.com/en/contact
#2 The only added features when paired with an iPhone is weather and music controls, depending on the watch. A Polar watch can work independently of a phone. Hope this helped and I understood your question. When you first set up your watch, you use Flowsync or the phone to complete the process and assign it to your account.
There are companies that don't seem to care as much. A couple of years ago I was using Strava on my motorcycle and getting pinged by mountain bikers that were pissed that I was beating their KOMs. I didn't know, I get it, so I stopped using Strava on bike profile. I got a contact from a friend of mine knew a developer at Strava. I thought Strava was a great app and I emailed them to see if they could create sports profile choices for Motocross and for Enduro riding. The answer I got back is that Strava is a human powered company and they weren't interested in any sports profiles outside of that. I spoke with him about this being a better product for the customer that is trying to track their fitness and their performance in their sport. Why do they care so much about what the sport is? Again they gave me a more political answer about not being interested in those sports (i.e. customers). For an app that is trying to get more participation and subscriber services I'm not sure why this was such a big deal.
Its kind of like Strava for Motocross - this way I can see how I'm doing as compared to other guys:
To put that difference into perspective, if you are going 30mph down a straight, the XGPS is going to capture a data point every 4.4 feet. @ 1 hz at the same speed, you would travel 44 feet between data points. That’s a noticeable difference in motocross data and the XGPS160 is hands-down a superior GPS device for backend analysis in LitPro or Aimsports RS3 software.
Post a reply to: VITALMX asked and Polar delivered