Posts
67
Joined
1/17/2020
Location
CA
In the market for some new goggles and I recall hearing something against how 100% made their lenses in the older (racecraft) goggles compared to a new goggle like the Scott Prospect. Something like they aren't nearly as durable. I ride a lot of fire/logging roads and gravel chips off vehicles is a concern sometimes as well as any other roost. Just wondered if there is a difference in lens quality or protection ability between the Racecraft and the Prospect, or if the new 100% Armega is different as well.
Running a Bell Moto-9 Flex helmet
Running a Bell Moto-9 Flex helmet
100% does make hard lenses for their goggles that are more durable than the softer flexible ones.
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
The lens is crystal clear with no distortion. They're as clear as the the lenses on my reading glasses. Fit is top notch.
Fwiw, my glasses and sunglasses are Oakley.
https://eksbrand.com/
Anyways, the Prospect is a great goggle for a racer. In my opinion the best tearoff system and the best roll-off system and relatively cheap. The only minus for me is the "thin" lens compared to the Oakley, 100% Armega, Leatt etc goggles and that the lens removal system is still a pain in the ass compared to the competitors.
I would easily pay 25 bucks for a proper clear injection molded lens.
I remember when you had to lock the lens in in the groves
Pit Row
Post a reply to: Goggle question