2015 SX250/TC250 Suggested Mods

kylant
Posts
64
Joined
4/8/2015
Location
South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
5/9/2015 5:54am
what jetting would you guys run at 4500-6500ft elevation and 60-75* out? i know wide range, but riding in the mountains the temps and elevation can vary greatly.
I have 40p, NECJ 3rd, 158m, as 2. It seems good, maybe fat on the bottom. (i’m guessing, i have been mostly riding slow rocky technical single track rides lately, and there is a stream of splooge running down the silencer at the end of the ride (silencer new))

i was thinking dropping to 38p, raising clip one or going to a NEDK needle
suggestions?
thx
hoova
Posts
69
Joined
3/5/2012
Location
AU
5/13/2015 5:48am
Anyone got any experience with the rekluse exp 3.0 on a 250sx with mx. I've always thought they'd be a good mod but never seen or rode a bike with one.
Matt
swtwtwtw
Posts
1287
Joined
4/16/2008
Location
Apple Valley, CA, USA
5/13/2015 8:54pm
new graphics:
wpark89
Posts
1160
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA, USA
6/7/2015 5:30pm
Anyone else run into this?

I just put a PC pipe on my 250 (the stock one lasted 9 hours before it cracked)

On the PC pipe my stock springs are loose and don't hold the pipe snug back to the cylinder.

They aren't stretched out or damaged and worked fine on the stock pipe.

I wonder if PC welded the hooks in the wrong spot and I need shorter springs now?

The parts fiche shows the stock KTM springs as 62mm so I'm think I'm going to try ordering a set of 57mm springs.

The Shop

seth505
Posts
10209
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA, USA
6/7/2015 7:53pm
wpark89 wrote:
Anyone else run into this? I just put a PC pipe on my 250 (the stock one lasted 9 hours before it cracked) On the PC...
Anyone else run into this?

I just put a PC pipe on my 250 (the stock one lasted 9 hours before it cracked)

On the PC pipe my stock springs are loose and don't hold the pipe snug back to the cylinder.

They aren't stretched out or damaged and worked fine on the stock pipe.

I wonder if PC welded the hooks in the wrong spot and I need shorter springs now?

The parts fiche shows the stock KTM springs as 62mm so I'm think I'm going to try ordering a set of 57mm springs.
Weird man, I was able to use stock springs with PC pipe.
JBernard_401
Posts
1317
Joined
10/29/2013
Location
Boulder, CO, USA
6/7/2015 7:57pm
seth505 wrote:
Weird man, I was able to use stock springs with PC pipe.
stock here on an FMF fatty and fit just fine.
and by fine i mean it takes 2000 ft lbs of torque to stretch that spring to the hook point. feels like youre about to hit yourself square in the face.
take a set of calipers to both pipes and measure distance from the hangar to the end of the pipe.
kylant
Posts
64
Joined
4/8/2015
Location
South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
6/8/2015 7:12am
wpark89 wrote:
Anyone else run into this? I just put a PC pipe on my 250 (the stock one lasted 9 hours before it cracked) On the PC...
Anyone else run into this?

I just put a PC pipe on my 250 (the stock one lasted 9 hours before it cracked)

On the PC pipe my stock springs are loose and don't hold the pipe snug back to the cylinder.

They aren't stretched out or damaged and worked fine on the stock pipe.

I wonder if PC welded the hooks in the wrong spot and I need shorter springs now?

The parts fiche shows the stock KTM springs as 62mm so I'm think I'm going to try ordering a set of 57mm springs.
i just switched to a PC pipe. I noticed the springs were not as tight as well, still functional but not the same as the FMF Fatty. I did notice though, the overall fitment of the pipe was much better. The silencer though, was a different story.
6/9/2015 6:01pm
I have a brand new fmf set up if anyone is interested [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/03/18/84228/s1200_20150318_215043.jpg[/img] Shoot me a tex 8482102782[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/03/18/84230/s1200_20150318_215109.jpg[/img]
I have a brand new fmf set up if anyone is interested

Shoot me a tex 8482102782

how much you looking to get?
6/9/2015 6:02pm
hoova wrote:
Anyone got any experience with the rekluse exp 3.0 on a 250sx with mx. I've always thought they'd be a good mod but never seen or...
Anyone got any experience with the rekluse exp 3.0 on a 250sx with mx. I've always thought they'd be a good mod but never seen or rode a bike with one.
Matt
I've heard they are great for desert, off road, single track, etc but shitty for the track.
6/9/2015 6:03pm
hellion wrote:
Your problem is not the connector, it's the jetting.
Seems to run good but does have an issue with spitting oil. Running it at 50:1, trying to figure out if I need to lean out...
Seems to run good but does have an issue with spitting oil. Running it at 50:1, trying to figure out if I need to lean out the air fuel screw or just rejet. Plug had a coffee color to it.
I had that problem with my silencer. I just rejetted mine. Went one leaner on main. one leaner on pilot. dropped clip one (closed needle off). she runs great now. also running 50/50 pump gas and vp110.
6/10/2015 2:06am
I have a brand new fmf set up if anyone is interested [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/03/18/84228/s1200_20150318_215043.jpg[/img] Shoot me a tex 8482102782[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/03/18/84230/s1200_20150318_215109.jpg[/img]
I have a brand new fmf set up if anyone is interested

Shoot me a tex 8482102782

how much you looking to get?
craig shoot me tex, pipe and silencer are brand new, and the silencer has that carbon fiber look, very trick, my # is in the pics
WVUpetro2013
Posts
427
Joined
3/18/2015
Location
Hurricane, WV, USA
6/10/2015 4:06am
hellion wrote:
Your problem is not the connector, it's the jetting.
Seems to run good but does have an issue with spitting oil. Running it at 50:1, trying to figure out if I need to lean out...
Seems to run good but does have an issue with spitting oil. Running it at 50:1, trying to figure out if I need to lean out the air fuel screw or just rejet. Plug had a coffee color to it.
I had that problem with my silencer. I just rejetted mine. Went one leaner on main. one leaner on pilot. dropped clip one (closed needle off)...
I had that problem with my silencer. I just rejetted mine. Went one leaner on main. one leaner on pilot. dropped clip one (closed needle off). she runs great now. also running 50/50 pump gas and vp110.
Ended up going with a 40pilot, Suzuki needle on 4th clip, and 162 main. Seems to run better and less splooge. I think the oil coming out is just residual oil from the packing being soaked earlier.
Markopolo400
Posts
1426
Joined
7/24/2012
Location
St. Paul-ish, MN, USA
6/10/2015 6:39am
kylant wrote:
i just picked up the ’15 linkage and knuckle from Rocky Mountain for $180. less than just the PC link. anxious to try it
Did you try the new linkage yet? I'm curious how much of a difference it made.
6/10/2015 12:30pm
Rocket: thanks bud. I'm not ready to buy yet though..waiting to see what my lady gets me for my birthday.. hoping exhaust. lol
Tom711
Posts
202
Joined
2/20/2015
Location
GB
12/19/2015 3:31am
Glad I've fallen on this thread, some good info in here.
I own a 14 sx 250 and while I'm currently out with a broken collarbone, plan on a few upgrades.
I've already had the suspension revalved and sprung for my weight and have just ordered the PC linkage arm.
I've got the ktm sxs (made by doma) front pipe, which I did run with the PC304 silencer but the weld snapped where the pipe goes in the can so I've just bought a fmf powercore2.
I was thinking of adding the 300 kit, but have decided against it. I like to keep my bike in the revs so not sure the 300 will be for me. Instead I'm going to have the 250 motor worked on and also having the carb oval bored to 38mm.
also been looking at the vforce 4, but not decided yet, all depends how funds are looking when it comes to putting the bike back together.
Tom.
Pirate421
Posts
1826
Joined
7/26/2015
Location
USA
12/19/2015 7:52pm
I'll jump in here and add that a lot of these bikes get oily mess all over the back of the engine and the carb area. Most likely it is from the coupling between the silencer and the header. I put a little high temp rtv on the inside of the coupling and then zip-tyed the two indentions on the coupling. No more splooge on the engine or carb. Cheap and easy fix.
Pirate421
Posts
1826
Joined
7/26/2015
Location
USA
12/19/2015 7:59pm
I also ordered a lectron carb. I have only
Ridden with it twice and am getting it sorted but so far it starts with one kick, no splooge and is much easier to adjust. Don't have to take the carb or float cap off to change jets, just adjust idle screw or power jet screw. 10 second adjustments and less than $500 for the whole kit with throttle cable and Rods. I wasn't bad at jetting, or maybe I was, but after what seemed like 100 different combos in my climate is had enough.
Hal_Simpson
Posts
53
Joined
12/1/2015
Location
Cypress, TX, USA
3/9/2016 8:01am
How did you manage that? I was just on there and its listed at $316 for both.
kylant wrote:
where are you seeing that? under KTM 2015 250 SX chassis pro lever linking parts fische numbers 1 and 2 they come complete with all bearings...
where are you seeing that?

under KTM
2015
250 SX chassis
pro lever linking parts fische
numbers 1 and 2
they come complete with all bearings, spacers, and seals installed. I did add some more grease to the lever bearing

the pull rod is $104.63
PULL ROD CPL. SX 15
Part #131307009583
Mfg. #7770408304401

the triangle lever is $99.44
TRIANGLE LEVER CPL. SX | 2014
Part #131307009582
Mfg. #7770408004401

$204.07 - 10% for previous order. actually it was $183 and change shipped.
Just installed this morning
How did that 2015 linkage work?
6/2/2019 8:25pm
I will reply to this old topic as I could not find any better topic for TC250/SX250 2015 engine mods.

I have a TE250 2015. It has at the moment these engine mods:

1. Left hand side panel has four 1” holes drilled for improved breathing. This mod is just for Husqvarnas restricted airboxes not needed for KTM.

2. Keihin PWK 38S carb (38 mm two mm larger than std 36 mm)

3. Jetting 175 main jet, 42 pilot jet, Suzuki RM 250 2008 NECJ needle in 3rd (middle) clip position, air screw 2 turns open, 6.5 slide

4. V-Force 4 reed cage

5. TC250 cylinderhead milled 0.5 mm (squishband 1.20 mm)

6. TC250 CDI and heat range 8 NGK Iridium spark plug

7. Red power valve spring in place of std yellow spring and adjustment screw flush (not turned in or out)

I have ignition map switch but run this bike only with more agressive setting = high setting

With these above engine mods it has totally changed this bikes performance. It is basically now modified TC250. I have different gear ratios as it is TE250 with 6 gears and high gear ratios. In Europe we have as std 14-50 sprockets but I have 12-42 so even higher ratio.

Next it will get RK Tek head and Wiseco 1-ring Racers Elite forged piston. Also Bill’s Pipes full exhaust system. I have ordered and paid my Bill’s Pipes nickel coated pipe many months ago but there are some delay with the coated ones (coating itself). It will get carbon fiber silencer. RK Tek head and this piston are waiting to be installed when I get my Bill`s Pipes exhaust and silencer first. I will also do a few small things to the cylinder when I change that piston. Later maybe another RK Tek head insert and I will raise the cylinder with 0.75 mm extra base gasket to get a bit longer transfer ports and exhaust ports duration. But this must have the correct head insert so the squish is correct.
15tc150
Posts
403
Joined
4/21/2019
Location
CA
6/3/2019 4:19pm
Lol, I ran a stock yz250 cast piston in my 2012 250sx, bolted right in and fattened up the midrange due to the piston window, I raised my cylinder up to the point that the piston at BDC didn't protrude into the ports anymore, so i opened up 100% of the ports, zero obstruction by the piston, then to boot, I raised the resting height of the pv 0.5mm, and I tried this with many measurements, and 0.5mm was the golden setup, it had power right off idle, but, 1mm over stock resting height, and it was too much, and it gave negative results, so I tuned it back to the 0.5mm. Next up, obviously red pv spring, and I ran my pv adjuster screw flush to the cover plate, this got the pv open the soonest, and helped carry a gear higher in every situation. For carb size, pwk38s, as Iv seen dyno charts, and going up 2mm in carb size is worth 2hp from idle to redline, and 1.5lbs of torque the entire curve as well, and then fed it through a boyesen rad valve, I have tried the stock 2014 reed cage ktm makes, a v3 block, v4 block, and the radvalve, and the radvalve was the clear winner, it gave power all through the revv range, and when the vforce blocks would teeder out on the top end, the radvalve never stopped pulling, bottom, mid and top end, the radvalves the winner, vforce only beats it in the midrange, and how it affected the power wasn't worth using it vs the radvalve. Exhaust, there's only one exhaust setup for this bike, and that's the pro circuit exhaust, best all round power with the most extended top end revv, Iv tried the fmf exhaust, and was totally underwhelmed by it, the pc setup is awesome, now for the kicker mod, a 12oz flywheel weight, and if they had made a 14 or 16oz, I would have opted for it, the 12oz, I barely felt after all the mods I did, it was still a crazy spastic 2 stroke powerband, and if I never had the option to run one on the 250sx, I would have sold the bike as it's tooo pipey of an engine in stock trim, the 2017' engine however, i could race and ride that engine for life without needing to add addition rotating mass, but the 03-16 engine was just a brutal brutal weapon of an engine. PS, my 2012 250 sx with all the mods done, was a 450 eater, it would lug 3rd in low speed corners and 180's and if you were rolling at a good pace, sometimes I'd never have to take it out of fourth, and only use the top half of the rpm range on the straits, it was the most 4 stroke like 2 stroke Iv ever ridden, power everywhere, and talking about it makes me wish I never sold it Sad
1
6/3/2019 8:20pm
Thanks 15tc150 for sharing your experience and knowlegde about these engines. Sounds like a really fun bike when modified. As my bike is TE250 it has more flywheel weight as std than TC250. I have removed electric starter and battery etc. to get it lighter and installed Slavens Racing replacement cover in place of std cover. I will definitely try your setting by raising pv 0.5 mm. You had a different piston from YZ 250 in it so it is difficult to compare V-Force 4 vs. Boyesen Rad Valve when using KTM/Husky pistons without piston window. Very interesting how much more 38 mm carb gives vs. 36 mm but it definitely feels like it too. I will go with V-Force 4 and Bill’s Pipes exhaust. You had a real beast engine and I can understand if you now regret you sold it away. Thanks once again for sharing your knowledge.
15tc150
Posts
403
Joined
4/21/2019
Location
CA
6/3/2019 10:31pm
Noooo trouble man, hope this gives some insight, and helps you out, and if some people don't agree with the pv settings, that's fine, they worked amazingly for me and my supporting mods, ps, I never did anything aboot my head squish, stock head, so I know for sure I was far beyond a good 1.5mm squish band, and another thing I'd look into as well is an sx cdi box, 2013+ ones help make controllable power, the 2012 and earlier cdi boxes are brutal in power delivery, and I liked the 13 cdi box much better, took it from snapshow to stump puller, made it feel more like a 300, and over the xc cdi box, it will reaaally ramp things up power wise. And as for the 38mm carb swap, I was hoping when I did the swap, that I was gonna plush out the snapshow bottom end delivery, and add more top end and over revv, well.... it completely backfired, and the dyno charts showed me exactly that when I discovered them. The engines just corked right up
With the carb, the only year ktm put a 38mm carb in the 250sx was the 03, and they swapped it for the 36mm, but they never changed the intake block either, from 03-16 the engine was setup for a 38mm carb, same part number since 03 Wink have fun with it! And sorry for the novel again!

Duke Kaboom Wink
1
6/4/2019 12:16am Edited Date/Time 6/4/2019 12:36am
When you had stock head in it you could have maybe changed your squish band by cylinder height changes... Anyway when there is less static compression ratio with stock cylinder head engine will have better top end power and over rev. I use TC250 2014 CDI box in my bike. Good to know the differences from <= 2012 and 2013 => CDI boxes. I choosed the correct one then... =) These bikes should all come from the factory with 38 mm carbs. At least the mx versions.
6/4/2019 2:54am Edited Date/Time 6/21/2019 2:37pm
A bit of offtopic maybe but what are the max rpm`s of these modified 250´s? Somewhere in the range 9000 - 10000 rpm maybe? I just calculated the piston average speed at 9000 rpm, 9500 rpm and 10000 rpm because I wanted to know if 1-ring piston will be justified vs. 2-ring piston. These 250´s have a stroke lenght of 72 mm = 0.072 meter so 2 x 0.072 meter x rpm divided by 60 is the piston average speed in meters per second. These modified 250´s have quite high piston speeds because of the long stroke 72 mm.

9000 rpm 21,6 m/s
9500 rpm 22,8 m/s
10000 rpm 24,0 m/s


Here are the very same piston speeds for a comparison for Husqvarna TC 125 with a stroke lenght of 54.5 mm and these are always equipped with only 1-ring piston:

11890 rpm 21,6 m/s
12550 rpm 22,8 m/s
13210 rpm 24,0 m/s

So it seems like this 1-ring Wiseco Racers Elite piston is good for high rpm use. Or actually high piston speeds.

15tc150
Posts
403
Joined
4/21/2019
Location
CA
6/4/2019 8:42am Edited Date/Time 6/4/2019 1:28pm
I like your thinking, a lot actually, that's radness your taking piston speeds into consideration, but 250 2 strokes I feel really like 2 rings for their compression abilities, and less blow by potentially, and as for head squish, yep, lower compression makes for more top end, and if I had gotten the head milled to work with my raising the cylinder to get the ports opened up without the piston obstructing them, I honestly don't even wanna know what it would have been like, I'd probably cry, that 250sx was so fucken powerful, that getting off my 03 cr250 that was pretty modded as well, i ported the cylinder myself and cleaned up everything and matched the cylinder to the cases, but stepping off the cr250 and putting a leg over the 250sx, power wise, felt like I was getting off a 125 onto a 250 2 stroke again, it was that nutts, so if I had gotten the head milled, I'm willing to bet it would have been borderline Crazy. And as for Cdi's, you absolutely have the right one for sure, the 2012 cdi was designed around the previous porting the 2007-2010 bikes had, supreme top end monsters, and in 2011 they changed the porting to mellow out the delivery, but didn't match the cdi to the changes made. And fully agree, they should have come with the 38mm carb, and more rotating mass at the crank. I really think people underestimate what rotating mass can do for power. The more mass your crank has, the more force it can produce, and that means it will push that rear wheel harder every revolution of the crank. To a certain extent obviously, too much crank mass can reduce power as well. But too little crank mass means a zippy powerband that feels soooooooo fast on the straits, but when it comes to corner speed, it's honestly so slow, and tiring, 4 strokes have shown the world what a smooth butter powerband does in the dirt, and for as slow as they feel in a strait line, they are faster around the track than a 2 stroke..... so which ones faster? The peaky revvy wheel spinning bike? Or the more rotating mass slower revv more hooked up one? I can tell you for sure, my 2015 tc144, has a 12oz, off a 150xc, and as soon as I bolted it on, and went for a rip, it was instant corner speed, it reeled into corners better, it lugged better, it accelerated more controlled, revved out higher, and was lifting the front wheels out of corners without hesitation it was so hooked up vs how it was before. now it's ported like crazy, and revs out like a 125, and Iv even modified my scalvini pipe with stinger end of 250 piping and am running a 250sx silencer, lots of people will say not enough back pressure, blah blah blah, but with the xtra cc's and the porting done, it was apparent that the stock 23mm id piping was choking up my engine so much that I had to go astronomically rich in jetting to get it to run properly. From the first blip of the throttle with the 250 silencer, it was noticeable, then the midrange hit, and my eyes opened up, then it made me smile from ear to ear with just how much power it makes up top with the un corked silencer. Again a novel!!!!!! Bahhhh!! You sir are tuning me into a bit of a Chatty Cathy, but I never get to talk tech like this at home or to my friends, they don't get it!!!! Thank you sir!!! Absutely loving this tech talk, love hearing all angles and what people are trying to squeeze out of their rigs
1
6/4/2019 1:32pm
I enjoy to read your ”novels”... it is very interesting to read about another ”piston heads” mods and you have very good knowledge about these engines.

I also agree that a little more crank/flywheel weight is good for traction. TE250 has more crank/flywheel rotating weight than TC250 because of the electric starter originally.

1-ring piston has many benefits and in 2-ring piston the top ring is the only ring which really matters as it is in contact with combustion gas/pressure and can really seal. I mean as long as the top ring does not have blow by. Second ring is just hanging in there until the top ring starts to leak pressure and then it tries to seal but usually at that time both rings are already in changing condition anyway. I think the only real benefit for second ring is the heat dissipation but even this task is mainly done by top ring anyway.

In my opinion it is more about how good quality piston, piston ring and piston ring groove are than just if it is 1-ring or 2-ring piston. Race engines have usually only 1-ring. Wiseco has that ArmorPlating in these Racers Elite pistons. It makes piston ring groove much more wear resistant and creates better piston ring sealing with the piston ring groove according to Wiseco. And these pistons are made of 2000 series alloy not 4000 series.

But 250’s are not so much at very high rpm than 125’s or like your modified 144. But like I wrote in my previous message there is quite high piston average speeds anyway and in my opinion this is what matters. I will try this 1-ring piston anyway when I next change my piston. There is now normal Wertex 2-ring piston in it. I will do some casting clean up to the cylinder when I take it off. No real porting but just some small things.

How much rpm do you think these modified 250’s have? Stock engines will rev at least to 8000 - 8500 rpm so I assume these will be in the 9000 - 10000 rpm range.
15tc150
Posts
403
Joined
4/21/2019
Location
CA
6/4/2019 5:45pm Edited Date/Time 6/4/2019 7:56pm
15tc150
Posts
403
Joined
4/21/2019
Location
CA
6/4/2019 5:46pm Edited Date/Time 6/4/2019 8:05pm
Lol, thank you, at least someone appreciated my useless knowledge (unlike my wife hahahahahaha. But as for these engines, the ktm engine will get up to around 10,500--10,750 rpm, and that's most 250 2 strokes, Yz250, 9000rpm, that's it. So make it pull of idle to maximize rpm range, had two, fun bikes, reliable, but pushed to the limit, and they start to show their flaws, but that's just my thoughts on them, still lots of reasons to get a yz250 over a ktm or a husky (ehhemm airfork).

As for the single vs twin, the bottom
Ring in a twin ring, does a lot for suction, and pulling a new charge into the engine as all the suction comes from the underside of the piston moving upwards, and then the same upon the piston coming down from top dead centre after combustion, it helps to then push the newly brought in charge of air and fuel up through the transfer and boost ports. The heat dissipation is a bit better than a single setup for sure, as the double ring faces transfer more heat to the cylinder wall over the single ring setup, but there in lies the advantages of the single ring piston, less ring resistance will mean the piston will travel more freely, and less friction from ring tension to the cylinder wall, will also decrease cylinder wear, and with the reduced friction, it will be free to make more top end power. I run single ring wiseco pistons in my 144, tried vertex replacements from ktm as they are a better grade of metal used when ordered from ktm, but I felt the twin ring top end wore out faster, made less power up top, and a bit better low end, so I pulled the wiseco piston I just pulled out of the top end, got new ring, wrist pin, and bearing, and sent my piston out to koolcoat to have the sides redfinished with teflon, and a ceramic coating added to the top to refect heat build up. I got alllllll the power I lost back.

One thing I find really helps a single ring hold compression better though is more mix, helps that little ring stand strong and cool in the face of high rpm danger lol.
I have to agree As well, the piston speeds of a 250 will be much higher at a lower rpm due to rod angle and stroke length.

And as for rpm range, a stock 125 tc or sx will both rev to about 12,000rpm, but with the sxs ignition I got for my 144, has raised the rpm range to probably 13,000rpm. It was well worth the 200 bucks I paid for it.

But for going with the piston, I'd just look into your rpm range that you usually spend time in, are you flying wfo? Or up and down using 100% of the rpm range idle to redline. That should be a defining factor to what power your looking for. Little tip when it comes to rings as well, I may have used a yz250 piston in the bike, but I used Honda ti piston rings in conjunction with it. It's a pretty rad combo, with exceptional wear life.
1
15tc150
Posts
403
Joined
4/21/2019
Location
CA
6/4/2019 7:58pm
Lordy, I just re read my posts and I HATE spellcheck! Lol
6/4/2019 9:58pm Edited Date/Time 6/4/2019 10:04pm
Thanks for max rpm info for these engines. I was actually going to buy a YZ 250 just because of it´s very good std suspension but decided to have Husqvarna instead.

My goal is to get wide rpm range usable power and believe it or not to make it easier to ride and less tiring by getting smoother power/torque curves. Red power valve spring is in now and will stay anyway as I like how it gives more power sooner. Adjusting screw set flush with the cover like you had also so power valve starts to open at 5700 rpm and is fully open at 7300 rpm. This is quite small rpm range only 1600 rpm vs. stock yellow power valve spring setting (flush) starting at 5700 rpm and fully open at 8000 rpm = 2300 rpm range for power valve to open fully. But I really like how the red spring gives the power out as it has more power sooner at lower rpm and I feel like I will be faster with it. If I used this bike for enduro I would put back that yellow spring.

That RK Tek head and Bill´s Pipes exhaust will also improve wide rpm range power not only high rpm. Actually RK Tek head may even give a little less high rpm power as I ordered it to have wide rpm range (13.5 marking in the head). It is ordered for pump gas 98 RON with 5% ethanol and sea level altitude mx use. It has around 0.9 mm squish band in it but there is more volume in the heads combustion chamber.

What I have read RK Tek head also likes to be fed by more fuel so I will definitely feed it more so this will help to keep piston ring cooler. I run 50:1 mix and unfortunately I have to use pump gas with 5% ethanol. Piston ring would seal better if more oil was used in the fuel mix like 32:1 or even more but I don´t want to use more oil as then carb settings has to be changed as it changes to leaner settings with the same jets/needle as fuel content is smaller and oil content is bigger.

I have now 175 main jet with stock FMF exhaust and I have 178 and 180 main jets to test with. I have also NEDJ needle to test with if needed. It should be the same as NECJ but half clip richer. I have now in it 42 pilot jet and have also 45 here. I will change my jetting when I install RK Tek head, Bill´s Pipes exhaust and that Wiseco 1-ring piston. Jetting is now very good and no spooge from the silencer.

You gave me again more to think about with your comments about second rings other tasks like suction of intake charge. But do you believe 1-ring pistons only piston ring doesn´t be able to work just as well if ring seal is good? It should work as it works in 125´s and smaller. One thing is these 250´s have 66.40 mm piston diameter. Two rings help to stabilize the piston better in the bore. But it depends how well the piston itself is designed as there are many other things like how the piston skirt is designed and how the exhaust/intake side of piston are balanced so the piston "rocks" less in the bore etc.

Post a reply to: 2015 SX250/TC250 Suggested Mods

The Latest