AMA running a scam?

carlosmacho
Posts
1493
Joined
12/8/2009
Location
Lost Wages, NV, USA
12/28/2011 8:54pm Edited Date/Time 12/28/2011 8:59pm
wardy wrote:
There is alot of things "people" don't need. Evidently history, process and foundations don't matter anymore? I am not "mad" at anything, but if any track...
There is alot of things "people" don't need. Evidently history, process and foundations don't matter anymore? I am not "mad" at anything, but if any track, no matter how big or small decides that they don't "need" to place the AMA banner on thier product. It's their choice. Then why would the people who do support the AMA , and it's membership want to support those places?

People may not "go to races" because it's AMA. But many races are or began as AMA and were built by that process. We are not talking nationals pro stuff here, but rather the real part of AMA which is the every day rider and racer who simply enjoys to go racing. AMA has for years been about that. Whats even more funny is when "people" decide to pull away from ama for this big issue only to go on to charge thier own membership fees. but we had this discussion already on another thread and won't go back over all that stuff again. You can believe what ya like and I know what i see and have seen for a long time. many "people" may dismiss it, as no big deal. well maybe it isn't, to me it seems that it's simply a lack of respect..
"Evidently history, process and foundations don't matter anymore?"

This is motocross does the term "what have you done for me lately" ring a bell?

"Then why would the people who do support the AMA "

Because they know their money is going towards a local org, the track and the track owner to keep him in business instead of being squandered away by some huge org that makes a lot of money who needs another big competitor to make it competitive and dedicated to the sport again instead of money"

""people" decide to pull away from ama for this big issue only to go on to charge their own membership fees"

Competition improves the breed. AMA should not be afraid of competition at the local level, they should just improve their product, get rid of some of the fat, lower the salaries (you know like everyone else that has had to deal with a slow economy) an make sure the money goes where it should, the local tracks and orgs will not have to do this function.

"but we had this discussion already on another thread and won't go back over all that stuff again"

I missed that one but would have loved to have shared my thoughts.

"to me it seems that it's simply a lack of respect"

Respect is earned not given, and it can be just as easily be lost, as it is won. The AMA has been making a lot of bad choices, acting like a business instead of an organization and being a promoter, or sleeping in bed with the promoter with no concern to riders best interests IMHO, and you can dismiss my opinion or believe what you want but I think you in your own words are noticing more and more people losing respect ". many "people" may dismiss "... which demands the question... why? I think we know the answer.
wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
12/28/2011 9:51pm
Well I think my opinion on this is clear. Not sure that the focus of these replys stayed on target.

The people that work and worked at AMA for alot of years most have done a good job. Todays group is the best it's ever been at least the ones i work with. They have my respect they have earned it.

Competition isn't the problem at all. The way it's done today limits the abilty for many to compete. that hopefully will change. AMA in my opinion has such a broad scope that it seems it never pleases anyone. They are the "biggest" target so it's easy to throw stuff to see what sticks.

We absolutely want it to be run like a business, at least a business that would not squander money. The staff and re-organization a few years ago addressed much of the stuff which is spoken here.

Its' going to be an interesting time, many of the people in my circle will continue to work hard to promote, improve, and help the AMA process work so that all racing can benifit not just the chosen few.
JB 19
Posts
4346
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH, USA
12/28/2011 10:19pm
I thought the whole "life time member" thing was a bad idea years ago. It makes no sense that someone still uses a service but gets it for free. I hit the 25 year mark two years ago......why would I pay anything else now?

It was probably a way to show a revenue spike from the guys who paid ahead......which probably got someone a big bonus. Probably that Holingsworth idiot.
Tim507
Posts
3489
Joined
6/8/2010
Location
Oregon City, OR, USA
12/28/2011 10:28pm
JB 19 wrote:
I thought the whole "life time member" thing was a bad idea years ago. It makes no sense that someone still uses a service but gets...
I thought the whole "life time member" thing was a bad idea years ago. It makes no sense that someone still uses a service but gets it for free. I hit the 25 year mark two years ago......why would I pay anything else now?

It was probably a way to show a revenue spike from the guys who paid ahead......which probably got someone a big bonus. Probably that Holingsworth idiot.
It would be an interesting study to see how many of us took advantage of "Life Membership". My guess is that the number is not very big.......could be wrong. The data may be on the AMA site in a oblique way?

The Shop

RaceFace
Posts
1608
Joined
8/15/2010
Location
USA
12/29/2011 5:47am
JustMX wrote:
Where to start? AMA has been a farce for some time. They let the four-stroke "revolution" occur with so little forethought it is scary. The result...
Where to start?

AMA has been a farce for some time.

They let the four-stroke "revolution" occur with so little forethought it is scary. The result is future generations of Motocrossers being completely priced out of our sport.

They still have not done anything mentionable to address the noise issue with the four strokes either.

Add in the Edmondson, AHRMA, and Supercross Fiascos that burned through MILLIONS of their member's dues and it is a wonder that they have the membership that they claim to still have.

Now we hear rumors about a ridiculous amount of money being paid to it’s president while the organization is hemorrhaging members and alienating long time promoters.

The serious question is how much longer will the AMA exist?
I know that everyone pretty much hates the AMA even as it is really the only organization out there that can do anything for any motorcyclist issues. It has always been a problem for us that we are so short-sighted as a group that we need to see benefit from something before we will support it, even though a lack of support can prevent benefits from being possible. At a membership of 250,000 with all of the motorcycles out there is a pathetic and sickening display. The NRA has no issue getting shit done because they have the support of just about every single legal gun holder. Imagine what the AMA could get done with 2.5 million members instead of a paltry 250,000. They do so much for street bikes because that is where the majority of their membership lies. Imagine we (MX and dirtbikers) get outdone in the political forum by Harley guys. Last Friday I went to the bar for 3 hours and dropped more than an AMA yearly membership in that time on beer and grub. A bunch of us did and will again tomorrow night. Many of those same people will scoff at sending the AMA $39 bucks for a year though. Take a look at the things the NRA can accomplish and we can't prevent a private MX track from being closed down. Sometimes we are collectively as retarded as we possibly can get. The AMA will exist for as long as people support it. We are so dumb that we basically protest and boycott the ONLY representative we have in the political world. Unless there is something out there that can serve us better, the AMA is all there is. Until that day we should all be supporting the AMA, regardless of how we feel about it. When the AMA goes to the government with any poitical issue and says we represent 250,000 members, the government says back "well I guess not many give a shit about what we intend to to here then, do they?" and then they go ahead and do it. I'm not saying I love the AMA and am happy with it, but it's all we have and it's either do something or do nothing. Right now we mostly choose to do nothing. Afterall, beer is expensive.
newmann
Posts
24437
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 6:14am
JustMX wrote:
Where to start? AMA has been a farce for some time. They let the four-stroke "revolution" occur with so little forethought it is scary. The result...
Where to start?

AMA has been a farce for some time.

They let the four-stroke "revolution" occur with so little forethought it is scary. The result is future generations of Motocrossers being completely priced out of our sport.

They still have not done anything mentionable to address the noise issue with the four strokes either.

Add in the Edmondson, AHRMA, and Supercross Fiascos that burned through MILLIONS of their member's dues and it is a wonder that they have the membership that they claim to still have.

Now we hear rumors about a ridiculous amount of money being paid to it’s president while the organization is hemorrhaging members and alienating long time promoters.

The serious question is how much longer will the AMA exist?
RaceFace wrote:
I know that everyone pretty much hates the AMA even as it is really the only organization out there that can do anything for any motorcyclist...
I know that everyone pretty much hates the AMA even as it is really the only organization out there that can do anything for any motorcyclist issues. It has always been a problem for us that we are so short-sighted as a group that we need to see benefit from something before we will support it, even though a lack of support can prevent benefits from being possible. At a membership of 250,000 with all of the motorcycles out there is a pathetic and sickening display. The NRA has no issue getting shit done because they have the support of just about every single legal gun holder. Imagine what the AMA could get done with 2.5 million members instead of a paltry 250,000. They do so much for street bikes because that is where the majority of their membership lies. Imagine we (MX and dirtbikers) get outdone in the political forum by Harley guys. Last Friday I went to the bar for 3 hours and dropped more than an AMA yearly membership in that time on beer and grub. A bunch of us did and will again tomorrow night. Many of those same people will scoff at sending the AMA $39 bucks for a year though. Take a look at the things the NRA can accomplish and we can't prevent a private MX track from being closed down. Sometimes we are collectively as retarded as we possibly can get. The AMA will exist for as long as people support it. We are so dumb that we basically protest and boycott the ONLY representative we have in the political world. Unless there is something out there that can serve us better, the AMA is all there is. Until that day we should all be supporting the AMA, regardless of how we feel about it. When the AMA goes to the government with any poitical issue and says we represent 250,000 members, the government says back "well I guess not many give a shit about what we intend to to here then, do they?" and then they go ahead and do it. I'm not saying I love the AMA and am happy with it, but it's all we have and it's either do something or do nothing. Right now we mostly choose to do nothing. Afterall, beer is expensive.
When the AMA screws up motocross in such a big way with the displacement rules and kills off the entire 125 class nationwide, don't you think they did the damage to themselves? Add to it being so pigheaded and not doing anything to correct the wrongs show them being loyal to a couple Japanese OEM's moreso than the members they look to for support.
wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 6:28am
you guys may think it's all AMA's fault for the two stroke problem and much of it is. However who was the first organization to change back to level the playing field and allow heads up racing on the amatuer level? blame the AMA for that too while you are at it

But lets not forget who really is behind much of this crap. OEM's and thier marketing plan, big money promoter who facilitate that plan. no big secret there is there? Where the problem has been is to many of these types strategically place themselves in the sport where they can make big influences on rules. Don't deny any of that, but who else out there will work to fix it?
wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 6:41am
real simple. we as a collective group of people who live/ love to ride / race and own motorcycles need to wake the fk up. it's all about ME in this silly little mx group. Raceface hit the proverbial nail on the head.

If anyone thinks that having little groups all over the country is better then being a part of one big group well this sport we love will be one of the first tobe gone the next time a hand wringing do gooder politician gets moving. Our organization (based on AMA proccess) worked together with ABATE and stopped a state senator from passing a bill out of committee that would have made it illegal for anyone under the age of 16 to race, ride, operate an off road vehicle. That was done with the help and guideance learned and used from AMA and the people who were trained by the AMA process.

No way is AMA perfect and no way will it ever be. But today after all it's growing pains and bad moves is there anyone else out there doing what they do? We in IL have worked in the system for over 40 years, things are tough, but we work together. How well does it work in you area? If it doesn't why not?

Racing in many of the instances that have been spoken here is really going to be better because they run them non ama and pocket the lessor membership fee? Can't anyone see what is the real issue here?

10.00 bucks to 49.00 is what? a half a tank a gas today? I guess the headline of this post of it being a "scam". Well going to a motocross race paying the race fees for a "big track" and getting 4 laps so 4o classes can run in a day is ok i guess but spending 10.00 bucks more for a process and foundation for new tracks and all tracks and clubs can move forward with a voice is to costly.

It won't change anyones' minds i guess but around here we still see a value in it.
newmann
Posts
24437
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 6:55am
I paid my money to prop up the AMA, even made a few additional contributions along the way. Paid their fees for quite a few years for both of my kids as well. Topic of my thread was why are they sending me a renewal notice when I'm a paid in full member. Everyone going off in different directions , well I guess other people have their beefs as well.
newmann
Posts
24437
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 6:58am
Doesn't have anything to do with $10.00 to $49.00. Has to do with them going after life members for more money to renew a membership.

I'll repeat it again if anyone needs me to.
Bruce372
Posts
6329
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 7:07am
now they dont have the AMA requirements, i might just try and race the RedBud races this year.

We've all seen plenty of tracks close, but i've never seen/heard of the AMA trying to keep riding areas open; however, i see people riding on the street with no helmets, and i am led to believe the AMA has worked on the laws to keep that happening.
carlosmacho
Posts
1493
Joined
12/8/2009
Location
Lost Wages, NV, USA
12/29/2011 7:12am Edited Date/Time 12/29/2011 7:20am
wardy wrote:
real simple. we as a collective group of people who live/ love to ride / race and own motorcycles need to wake the fk up. it's...
real simple. we as a collective group of people who live/ love to ride / race and own motorcycles need to wake the fk up. it's all about ME in this silly little mx group. Raceface hit the proverbial nail on the head.

If anyone thinks that having little groups all over the country is better then being a part of one big group well this sport we love will be one of the first tobe gone the next time a hand wringing do gooder politician gets moving. Our organization (based on AMA proccess) worked together with ABATE and stopped a state senator from passing a bill out of committee that would have made it illegal for anyone under the age of 16 to race, ride, operate an off road vehicle. That was done with the help and guideance learned and used from AMA and the people who were trained by the AMA process.

No way is AMA perfect and no way will it ever be. But today after all it's growing pains and bad moves is there anyone else out there doing what they do? We in IL have worked in the system for over 40 years, things are tough, but we work together. How well does it work in you area? If it doesn't why not?

Racing in many of the instances that have been spoken here is really going to be better because they run them non ama and pocket the lessor membership fee? Can't anyone see what is the real issue here?

10.00 bucks to 49.00 is what? a half a tank a gas today? I guess the headline of this post of it being a "scam". Well going to a motocross race paying the race fees for a "big track" and getting 4 laps so 4o classes can run in a day is ok i guess but spending 10.00 bucks more for a process and foundation for new tracks and all tracks and clubs can move forward with a voice is to costly.

It won't change anyones' minds i guess but around here we still see a value in it.
Well if the AMA does the right thing for the membership, it will continue to flourish. If not, people will quit giving money to it. My comment meant running it as a for profit business instead of a non profit org. And yes there has to be some benefit to me before I give them my money or to anyone, unless they are poor and in need of charity. Whether a for profit business or a non prof org if it does not do right by me, they are not going to get my money. Pure and simple. Has AMA done some things right in the past for a good foundation? Sure, but as with any business or org you cannot rest on your laurels or expect people not to quit membership if you make questionable decisions or don't have the members (riders) best interests in mind. If there has been some house cleaning, great, it appears to be needed but now they need to show us what they got, or face competition. Competitions for an old lazy fat complacent for prof or non prof always improves the breed. And the fat and complacent disappear into te sunset.
12/29/2011 9:37am Edited Date/Time 12/29/2011 9:52am
All of this talk about how promoters and tracks are going to dump the AMA is very disturbing to me for one reason…The youth portion of the sport of motocross would be on its death bed at the end of this week (when the Lead Law stay of enforcement was set to expire) if it weren’t for the AMA fighting for our rights as motorcyclists over the past couple of years. Most folks on this board have made it clear in the past that they couldn’t give a shit if youth racing were around or not…(crazy mini-dads, track time taken away for a bunch of kids turtling around the course)…I get that. What those blowhards don’t get is that many of those tracks they ride would not even be in existence if it weren’t for the mini crowd coming through the gate. And…It’s not just the extra rider entries…It’s brother, sister, grandma, grampa, etc…They all come through the gate, they all go to the concession stand, and they all make up a huge portion of supporting this sport. From the tracks I surveyed while the Lead Law fight was in full-swing, the data showed that roughly 35% of entries are youth based. Take into consideration the extra heads that those entries bring through the gate, and it’s not inconceivable that 40-45% of a track’s revenue comes from youth entries. So…if your question to the AMA is ‘what have you done for me lately’, the answer is ‘saved your favorite track from closing in the near future’!

Now…On the other side of the coin, I can fully understand why the promoters are dubious and mistrusting of the AMA. There have been decades of built-up friction between the AMA and its tracks…Mostly because the AMA was constantly stepping in and trying to compete directly with their business (remember AMA Pro, Jam Sports, etc…). My strong hope is that era has passed. When Rob Dingman came to the helm of the organization, one of his clear goals was to simplify the AMA’s mission to focus only on motorcycle legal issues and the amateur racing rulebook (Rights, Riding, Racing). The AMA shed all of it’s promoting functions, and they instead have focused sharply on keeping our sport alive and making sure that there is a single, clear set of rules that everyone can go racing by. I can only hope that this mission has stayed consistent, and that the AMA is not trying to move outside the bounds they set for themselves a couple of years ago. If the promoters are sensing that the AMA is poised once again to try to take a chunk out of their ass, then it’s the AMA’s responsibility to communicate clearly to them what their mission is. If they are incapable of doing that, or in fact, their mission has changed, then shame on them…The promoters have all rights to protect their own turf.

Newmann, As for your email being a scam, I am 100% sure that it’s the result of a poorly constructed query when the AMA wrote the script to pump out the robo-emails. I had a similar situation when I went online to renew…There was no check box online to donate to the AMA PAC, so I didn’t…Every other year I have given my extra 10 bucks…The AMA needs to give much more overview when communicating with membership over money issues.

RaceFace, you nailed it. Ed Moreland, the AMA’s chief Washington D.C. council during the Lead Law fight (ironically, Ed has now taken a job setting up Harley’s new D.C. office) once told me that 1 million members for any organization is a tipping point. Once there are a million potential votes out there, folks on the Hill start listening. The AMA is the ONLY organization out there capable of fighting for our rights at the national level. Not supporting those efforts is unbelievably short sighted…All you have to do is make a simple list of all the arrows pointed at us to understand what fragile ground our sport stands on (noise, safety, engine emissions, dust, land use, erosion, etc., etc.). One law or regulation in ANY ONE of these areas could potentially debilitate our rights to ride and race (and a promoter’s ability to make a living). My advise: purchase a membership and become a part of ensuring a strong future for our sport. At that point, if you have a beef with how business is being conducted, then you’ll have a conduit (through your district representation) to make your voice heard.

Sean @ Cobra
wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 9:48am
thanks Sean, I am always happy to see you at congress and involved in the process. Wish that every year, every OEM would take the time to sit down and as much tell us thier plans, ask what membership is looking for. It would help both tremondously.


To add to that point about the district which I personally know a little about. IF there isn't a representitive in you area, go become one, if the one in your area isn't doing what you wish them to do, run against them. AMA as in any grass roots type organization NEEDS NEW IDEAS, new blood etc. When we went to congress last fall I took my 15 year old with me, he took the referee certification seminar. It was eye opening what can be learned from 40 some referees sitting around a table.

Congress delegates like myself will take all advice, input, etc, I have people call me all the time. No matter where you are in the country AMA is about it's members, and well it works pretty well if people would get pro-active.
carlosmacho
Posts
1493
Joined
12/8/2009
Location
Lost Wages, NV, USA
12/29/2011 10:09am Edited Date/Time 12/29/2011 10:14am
All of this talk about how promoters and tracks are going to dump the AMA is very disturbing to me for one reason…The youth portion of...
All of this talk about how promoters and tracks are going to dump the AMA is very disturbing to me for one reason…The youth portion of the sport of motocross would be on its death bed at the end of this week (when the Lead Law stay of enforcement was set to expire) if it weren’t for the AMA fighting for our rights as motorcyclists over the past couple of years. Most folks on this board have made it clear in the past that they couldn’t give a shit if youth racing were around or not…(crazy mini-dads, track time taken away for a bunch of kids turtling around the course)…I get that. What those blowhards don’t get is that many of those tracks they ride would not even be in existence if it weren’t for the mini crowd coming through the gate. And…It’s not just the extra rider entries…It’s brother, sister, grandma, grampa, etc…They all come through the gate, they all go to the concession stand, and they all make up a huge portion of supporting this sport. From the tracks I surveyed while the Lead Law fight was in full-swing, the data showed that roughly 35% of entries are youth based. Take into consideration the extra heads that those entries bring through the gate, and it’s not inconceivable that 40-45% of a track’s revenue comes from youth entries. So…if your question to the AMA is ‘what have you done for me lately’, the answer is ‘saved your favorite track from closing in the near future’!

Now…On the other side of the coin, I can fully understand why the promoters are dubious and mistrusting of the AMA. There have been decades of built-up friction between the AMA and its tracks…Mostly because the AMA was constantly stepping in and trying to compete directly with their business (remember AMA Pro, Jam Sports, etc…). My strong hope is that era has passed. When Rob Dingman came to the helm of the organization, one of his clear goals was to simplify the AMA’s mission to focus only on motorcycle legal issues and the amateur racing rulebook (Rights, Riding, Racing). The AMA shed all of it’s promoting functions, and they instead have focused sharply on keeping our sport alive and making sure that there is a single, clear set of rules that everyone can go racing by. I can only hope that this mission has stayed consistent, and that the AMA is not trying to move outside the bounds they set for themselves a couple of years ago. If the promoters are sensing that the AMA is poised once again to try to take a chunk out of their ass, then it’s the AMA’s responsibility to communicate clearly to them what their mission is. If they are incapable of doing that, or in fact, their mission has changed, then shame on them…The promoters have all rights to protect their own turf.

Newmann, As for your email being a scam, I am 100% sure that it’s the result of a poorly constructed query when the AMA wrote the script to pump out the robo-emails. I had a similar situation when I went online to renew…There was no check box online to donate to the AMA PAC, so I didn’t…Every other year I have given my extra 10 bucks…The AMA needs to give much more overview when communicating with membership over money issues.

RaceFace, you nailed it. Ed Moreland, the AMA’s chief Washington D.C. council during the Lead Law fight (ironically, Ed has now taken a job setting up Harley’s new D.C. office) once told me that 1 million members for any organization is a tipping point. Once there are a million potential votes out there, folks on the Hill start listening. The AMA is the ONLY organization out there capable of fighting for our rights at the national level. Not supporting those efforts is unbelievably short sighted…All you have to do is make a simple list of all the arrows pointed at us to understand what fragile ground our sport stands on (noise, safety, engine emissions, dust, land use, erosion, etc., etc.). One law or regulation in ANY ONE of these areas could potentially debilitate our rights to ride and race (and a promoter’s ability to make a living). My advise: purchase a membership and become a part of ensuring a strong future for our sport. At that point, if you have a beef with how business is being conducted, then you’ll have a conduit (through your district representation) to make your voice heard.

Sean @ Cobra
As for the lead ban and motorcycle companies not being able to certify parts on children motorcycles. The AMA needs lobbists? So now we are a special interest group that everyone hates? The problem is we vote in liberal democrats that have made it clear they are tax and spend and want to take our rights, like guns, the ability to ride without a helmet, equal access to public lands away. Yet we still vote them in. Shame on us I say, and voting is free, you don't have to give money to AMA for them to become a lobbyist for you.

"If they are incapable of doing that, or in fact, their mission has changed, then shame on them…The promoters have all rights to protect their own turf."
They have done this before, why should they trust them, I know I don't, as I said, trust is earned, and they have done nothing to regain my trust? The only reason they became promoters was to make money and to protect themselves because I think money flow was already starting to slow. I distrust them and they will have to gain that trust back if they want my money.

So now they are very much like the gov. They take your money, spend it on what they think, but with no representation. They are lobbyists. They are big like big gov. I don't trust the gov, and I don't trust the AMA? Neither has given me reason to.

But at this point with my money... "The more you talk the more things sound the same" .. "Never gonna get it, Never gonna get it, Never gonna get it," Smile
pummel
Posts
995
Joined
6/2/2010
Location
Salem, OR, USA
12/29/2011 10:11am
Was an AMA member for many years. To me it seemed like the AMA got a lot of membership money from motocrossers (Because we had to join to race) but we ranked very low on thier priorities. I remember getting The "Motorcyclist " magazine with tons of flat track and road race coverage and one small paragraph about the National Motocross series. Here in the Northwest the AMA doesn't mean much, I know it's a little different in other regions,
Sherwood
Posts
3682
Joined
5/12/2010
Location
USA
12/29/2011 10:22am
The best argument people have is it's "old and has history" and that should matter.

It really seemed to me that the AMA gave two shits about the lead law until Mc Grath and others spoke up about it at a dealership and they realized they'd be loosing a ton of money because parents wouldn't be buying memberships for their kids. Then they wanted to fight for dirt bike riders. (Just my opinion of how I saw it fold out). If they'd better separate it between Street bike members paying for what they want and dirt bike riders paying for what they want/need, I might support it, but as it stands now dealing with the AMA is like dealing with a union.
12/29/2011 10:59am Edited Date/Time 12/29/2011 11:22am
Carlosmacho, The AMA doesn't need lobbyists...they ARE our lobbyist! And, if you think simple voting is all that we need, you need to take a closer look at the facts surrounding the Lead Law. The CPSIA (official name of the Lead Law) was nearly unanimously voted in by both chambers and signed into law by a republican president. Out of the House and Senate, there was one lone ‘Nay’ vote…and that was Ron Paul (that’s one out of over 500 votes).

It took a few months for our industry to figure out the far-reaching consequences of the law. Other industries were equally taken by surprise…The bicycle companies, libraries, medical instrument firms, skateboard makers, etc. were all left scratching their collective heads as to how to stay in business.

What ensued for the motorcycle industry was two grueling years of communication and education (aka lobbying) as to why our product should be excluded from the law. Keep in mind…We were essentially asking our congressmen to make a vote that could potentially backfire big-time on them…All a competing candidate would have to claim is, “my competitor voted to help big business and bring harm to kids”. In the end, motorcycles were the ONLY product to have a categorical exclusion granted to them, and the AMA was a big part of making that happen (as were MX Sports, the MIC, promoters like Jonathan Beasley & Amy Ritchie, and a gazillion grass-roots folks that didn’t want to see their sport go away).

Don’t underestimate the effort or political skill that the AMA brought to the table in this issue…and their plate is currently full with many similar fights as well.

Oh…and for earning the trust of the promoters…I agree…it will take some time to earn it back…especially the ones that ran pro nationals under the previous regime.

Sean @ Cobra
JustMX
Posts
5318
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 11:24am
I do understand the threat that the lead law posed to our sport.

It is unfortunate that the AMA is so clueless to the threat that the noise and expense that the fourstroke revolution has brought to our sport.

Wardy, I do respect the work done by you and other representatives to AMA congress.

It would be much easier to give AMA more credit if AMA leadership had not been so clueless as to overturn a decision of the AMA congress like they did several years ago.

AMA rule Appendix 6.4, Promoter's duties and responsibilities, Section A, number 12 "The promoter must indicate in all advertisements that silenced exhaust systems are required"

Now that is pretty freaking funny......
Thor34103
Posts
287
Joined
7/22/2011
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
12/29/2011 11:55am
I too received the "renewal" notice from the AMA yesterday. I have not been a member for over 20 years, and when I was, it was at a different address. The only reason I joined (in 1972) was in order to race MX. I was held hostage in that aspect. My opinion has always been that the only thing that they want to do is fight helmet laws....... That is something i do not understand. The roadways are PUBLIC...... So people have to follow the laws. Does it make sense that I cannot drive my car on these public roads without wearing a seat belt, but I can ride a motorcycle on the same roads without a helmet?
carlosmacho
Posts
1493
Joined
12/8/2009
Location
Lost Wages, NV, USA
12/29/2011 12:01pm
Thor34103 wrote:
I too received the "renewal" notice from the AMA yesterday. I have not been a member for over 20 years, and when I was, it was...
I too received the "renewal" notice from the AMA yesterday. I have not been a member for over 20 years, and when I was, it was at a different address. The only reason I joined (in 1972) was in order to race MX. I was held hostage in that aspect. My opinion has always been that the only thing that they want to do is fight helmet laws....... That is something i do not understand. The roadways are PUBLIC...... So people have to follow the laws. Does it make sense that I cannot drive my car on these public roads without wearing a seat belt, but I can ride a motorcycle on the same roads without a helmet?
From a freedom standpoint, no you should not have to wear a seatbelt either. You are an adult, you can make those decisions for yourself. You endanger no one but yourself and it is not the fed gov responsibility to protect you from yourself.
jatharp12
Posts
198
Joined
4/2/2009
Location
Norman, OK, USA
12/29/2011 12:28pm
This whole bit about the AMA historically standing up for moto is complete bullshit! I'm pretty sure that back in the day, when motocross started in America, if the AMA found out you raced motocross, they would pull your licence and blackball you. It was cutting into their take from hare scrambles, or whatever they sanctioned back then. Ony afterwords, when they saw how much money they could make from it, did they start sanctioning mx.
mx836
Posts
5577
Joined
4/2/2008
Location
;, BF
12/29/2011 1:33pm
All this crying over $39 a year is pretty sad.
peelout
Posts
18399
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT, USA
12/29/2011 2:01pm Edited Date/Time 12/29/2011 2:02pm
Thor34103 wrote:
I too received the "renewal" notice from the AMA yesterday. I have not been a member for over 20 years, and when I was, it was...
I too received the "renewal" notice from the AMA yesterday. I have not been a member for over 20 years, and when I was, it was at a different address. The only reason I joined (in 1972) was in order to race MX. I was held hostage in that aspect. My opinion has always been that the only thing that they want to do is fight helmet laws....... That is something i do not understand. The roadways are PUBLIC...... So people have to follow the laws. Does it make sense that I cannot drive my car on these public roads without wearing a seat belt, but I can ride a motorcycle on the same roads without a helmet?
the seat belt deal is not directed at safety... in my opinion, it is just another way for the troopers and officers to pull you over for no reason in order to take a whiff of the air quality inside your cab. "oh, it looked like your seat belt wasn't attached, also, have you been drinking tonight?"
newmann
Posts
24437
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 2:03pm
mx836 wrote:
All this crying over $39 a year is pretty sad.
I'm not crying over $39.00 and don't really think many others here are either. Point is I've already paid my $39.00 and they are asking for another $39.00
steve_o_de
Posts
64
Joined
9/8/2009
Location
Chesterfield Twp., MI, USA
12/29/2011 2:30pm
Highsider wrote:
Kinda big news from Redbud: Important AMA fee info! Current members can renew for up to three years for $39 through March 31st. New members can...
Kinda big news from Redbud:

Important AMA fee info! Current members can renew for up to three years for $39 through March 31st. New members can join for $39 through December 31st. After those dates, membership fee will be $49/year.

RedBud will NOT require AMA membership in 2012, EXCEPT for the Loretta Lynn Regional qualifier and the ATV National,

but we know many of you will want to continue your memberships, so take advantage of the savings and renew early!
You won't lose months by renewing early; they'll add another year on to your current expiration date.
I recently herd (could be a rumor though) that the GLMX (Great Lakes MX) which is another state level sanctioning body in Michigan, Indiana and Ohio that previously was AMA was not going to be for 2012.
In Michigan, there are currently 6 GLMX tracks. Red Bud, Dutch Sport Park, Log Road, Gratten, Big Air and now Stanton. Other than a few private tracks, the rest are District 14.
One track owner that recently switched back to District 14 from GLMX told me that the AMA has raised its rates considerably. Also, I recently read in Racer X or TWMX that the AMA was in financial trouble.
carlosmacho
Posts
1493
Joined
12/8/2009
Location
Lost Wages, NV, USA
12/29/2011 2:35pm
peelout wrote:
the seat belt deal is not directed at safety... in my opinion, it is just another way for the troopers and officers to pull you over...
the seat belt deal is not directed at safety... in my opinion, it is just another way for the troopers and officers to pull you over for no reason in order to take a whiff of the air quality inside your cab. "oh, it looked like your seat belt wasn't attached, also, have you been drinking tonight?"
True but even a little worse than that. Hello, I see you are not wearing your seat belt, allow me to generate some revenue for the state. If you have been drinking, we will generate a lot more for the state, even though you have had no tickets, you were traveling 6mph over, that will be a little more revenue generating for the state, let me look around your car and see if there is any more taxes I can raise for the state in the name of safety... thank you very much.
JustMX
Posts
5318
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 2:35pm
From a freedom standpoint, no you should not have to wear a seatbelt either. You are an adult, you can make those decisions for yourself. You...
From a freedom standpoint, no you should not have to wear a seatbelt either. You are an adult, you can make those decisions for yourself. You endanger no one but yourself and it is not the fed gov responsibility to protect you from yourself.
Bingo
wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
12/29/2011 6:12pm
From a freedom standpoint, no you should not have to wear a seatbelt either. You are an adult, you can make those decisions for yourself. You...
From a freedom standpoint, no you should not have to wear a seatbelt either. You are an adult, you can make those decisions for yourself. You endanger no one but yourself and it is not the fed gov responsibility to protect you from yourself.
JustMX wrote:
Bingo
oh lets not even go to the seat belt bullsht. who do we see in government when ya get smoked at an intesection in the drivers door and that friggin seat beat is holding you tight against the door.???


I totally aggree carlos with your statement there and well the only reason we are forced to wear a seatbelt.............so insurance companies bottom line is more secure. that simple.

Many have bitched for years about "ama and the helmet laws". Around here Abate are the ones that push that more then AMA...... but this in it's self is a good point. How many states force you to wear your seat belt like here in the Soviet state of Illinois??? but if i owned a road bike i could blow down the interestate 65mph with a pair of sun glasses. WHY? because of organizations like Abate and AMA.

Same goes for Blue ribbon Coalition group they do a great job at what they do. AMA trys to work with and help in all those aspects. Many times things aren't what i particulary like but I do buy into the idea that united we stand and divided we fall.

Yes i was that mx rider in 1975 that had to buy an AMA card and district card, i have enjoyed racing since then and now my family does also. Our business was developed and has done well with the foundation and process provided by AMA and the District. I choose to work and help in that process and think it's a positive thing. You bet we can find many things that are wrong with the proceess I choose to help fix that.

In fact i spent the better part of the day today discussing things with other congress delegates working on things to improve the processses and discuss some new ideas.

with that i need to yield we have a riding park, and a race track. At our riding park we introduce riders every chance we can to AMA and it's product. People look for a structure, and this national structure has been used by ama and others for a long time and is proven to work pretty well. Evident by the discussion being had on a postboard in the middle of the winter.

Smile
KAWboy14
Posts
6502
Joined
12/31/2007
Location
Austin, TX, USA
12/29/2011 6:36pm
the ama couldnt even slow down the lead ban on minis before it hit!

Post a reply to: AMA running a scam?

The Latest