Jody, MXA, Two Strokes and Matthes

FlaNard
Posts
3620
Joined
10/13/2009
Location
Layton, UT, USA
1/13/2011 3:44pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 3:45pm
DC wrote:
Burn, I think I have done a few things useful and helpful, but I can't change the evolution of this industry, and neither can Kevin Crowther...
Burn, I think I have done a few things useful and helpful, but I can't change the evolution of this industry, and neither can Kevin Crowther. You want changes based on assumptions that it will make racing better for some, but what about the others? What if it doesn't work? What if everyone who doesn't make a two-stroke gets whipped? Do you think they will turn around and invest more in two-stroke racing, or just shut the doors and fire all of their riders and mechanics and focus on something else? Because that really might happen, and I don't really think our sport can take that risk right now. It's easy to demand change, based on opinion and preference, but what happens on the ground, in the pits, at a professional race?



It's easy to take risks with other people's careers and demand products to be changed to fit your cost range and preference when you're on a message board or bench racing at the parts counter, or pay way too much for an engine fix, but go to the next industry meeting and tell them you're changing the rules on them after all these years and all this investment, and in these financial times, and see how it goes.



There are real passions on either side of this, but one side is actually making the products and utilizing them in their racing programs, and we still need their participation in our sport. I wish it were different, but until it is, I guess I can't be helpful and useful here.



DC

MX Sports

You just described what happened with four strokes. To a T. Nobody seemed to mind back then (or if they did, the people in charge sure didnt give a shit). Funny that even considering a change to give privateers a chance is more then the sport can handle now.
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13293
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
1/13/2011 4:01pm
FlaNard wrote:
You just described what happened with four strokes. To a T. Nobody seemed to mind back then (or if they did, the people in charge sure...
You just described what happened with four strokes. To a T. Nobody seemed to mind back then (or if they did, the people in charge sure didnt give a shit). Funny that even considering a change to give privateers a chance is more then the sport can handle now.
Here's a shocking, brutal truth: the vast majority of privateers don't have a chance regardless and that's why they are and remain privateers. No matter how fast they are regionally or locally. The guys who have the talent to get good support almost always do. And almost always that's set in place before they can qualify for a pro race.

Notice, too, that there are two competing themes in this thread that cut against each other: privateers need 250 two strokes as a cheap performance threat to hopped up 250f's; but on the other hand, the 250 two stokes are not good enough against the hopped up 250f's that factories would adopt them and max them out in the same manner they do the 250f's now.

There may need to be solutions that level the playing field, but this one seems to present more problems than it's worth unless you can come up with some rule that fairly says major support teams can max out a 250f, and only other "lesser" riders can use the smoker.
FlaNard
Posts
3620
Joined
10/13/2009
Location
Layton, UT, USA
1/13/2011 4:04pm
FlaNard wrote:
You just described what happened with four strokes. To a T. Nobody seemed to mind back then (or if they did, the people in charge sure...
You just described what happened with four strokes. To a T. Nobody seemed to mind back then (or if they did, the people in charge sure didnt give a shit). Funny that even considering a change to give privateers a chance is more then the sport can handle now.
Here's a shocking, brutal truth: the vast majority of privateers don't have a chance regardless and that's why they are and remain privateers. No matter how...
Here's a shocking, brutal truth: the vast majority of privateers don't have a chance regardless and that's why they are and remain privateers. No matter how fast they are regionally or locally. The guys who have the talent to get good support almost always do. And almost always that's set in place before they can qualify for a pro race.

Notice, too, that there are two competing themes in this thread that cut against each other: privateers need 250 two strokes as a cheap performance threat to hopped up 250f's; but on the other hand, the 250 two stokes are not good enough against the hopped up 250f's that factories would adopt them and max them out in the same manner they do the 250f's now.

There may need to be solutions that level the playing field, but this one seems to present more problems than it's worth unless you can come up with some rule that fairly says major support teams can max out a 250f, and only other "lesser" riders can use the smoker.
So the answer is to do nothing? Gotcha.
1/13/2011 4:08pm
DC wrote:
I am headed home and headed to Phoenix, which means I won't be defending my stance here anymore tonight, or trying to explain that I didn't...
I am headed home and headed to Phoenix, which means I won't be defending my stance here anymore tonight, or trying to explain that I didn't write the four-stroke rule in the first place, and I can't change it by myself (nor do I think it's wise to do so now at the pro level given the investment the teams have already made over many years in changing to four-strokes). But I will keep trying to do my small part to improve the series and the sport, along with everyone else on here.



Anyone who wants to contact me directly can reach me at: DC@mxsports.com.



DC

MX Sports
hellion wrote:
MAJOR BUMMER. I used to see you as the anti establishment force with the amatuer focused paper who didn't care what the big's had to say...
MAJOR BUMMER. I used to see you as the anti establishment force with the amatuer focused paper who didn't care what the big's had to say. Now you are the Establishment. You just said the cause is no longer worth fighting for because you will not change a thing. IT'S OVER JOHNNY!
hahaha! Thanks DC.. I appreciate your support to the devolution of the sport. Hope people start thinking for themselves and start buying from others OEMs. I will also leave Racer-X on the rack with pleasure.. Go Cédric Soubeyras !

The Shop

FreshTopEnd
Posts
13293
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
1/13/2011 4:09pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 4:10pm
No, I don't know what the answer is at the pro level. But I don't think the answer to saving the sport at this point in time is to tell Davey he's a sell out unless he puts a rule in place the OEM's have said they don't want and tells them to shove it up their asses.



The answer for the 99.9% of us not constrained by pro mx rules is to buy a new smoker from one of the companies that is making them still and tell the dealers of the other brands in your town that you didn't buy that brand because they don't make the bike you want.
rgmx-49
Posts
1035
Joined
11/18/2010
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
1/13/2011 4:11pm
wow this thread got everyones attetion, almost 250 replies great job.
151
Posts
536
Joined
9/15/2009
Location
Olive Branch, MS, USA
1/13/2011 4:15pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 4:17pm
Honey vs vinegar guys.



Keep giving DC shit and see how keen he is to even consider your thoughts in the future. He is human.



The man said it in with no mixed words. 2010 was a big tv year. The bigger the tv ratings get the more ad money comes in and the less bike sales will have to do with the direction our sport takes.



Once again look at nascar. You cant go to your dealer and buy anything that remotely resembles a cup car, and it is illegal to drive like they race, yet they consitently rake in viewers and sponsors and advertisers.



Maybe we should go back to a works bike platform.



Or maybe a three class schedule 125, 250, open. With one forty minute moto. I would be all over that.



I think the only thing safe to say is that change is inevitable.
wpark89
Posts
1162
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA, USA
1/13/2011 4:23pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 4:25pm
Excellent quote from FTE:

"The best, most effective thing individuals can do to advance two strokes is to buy them from the OEMs that sell them and tell the dealers of other brands they aren't buying their bikes because they don't sell smokers. If the numbers add up, then more smokers will show up. If the numbers don't add up, then that's the only poll that matters"

This is absolutely correct..and if the racing rules are fairer it will happen.... All the bs and tangents aside, it boils down to we want fairer class structures to allow 2 strokes to be more competitive (because the survival of the 2 stroke is vital for the sport...and it has a better chance of surviving if there is a place somewhere in professional motocross for it).

We're not asking manufactures to start building 200's or bizzare random shit. Just saying that with all the bikes currently available it makes the most sense to put a 250 with a 250 as opposed to the current formula. Sure it isn't perfect. Some will love it...some will complain. But it's better.

Something should of been done 10 years ago.

FreshTopEnd
Posts
13293
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
1/13/2011 4:35pm
wpark89 wrote:
Excellent quote from FTE: "The best, most effective thing individuals can do to advance two strokes is to buy them from the OEMs that sell them...
Excellent quote from FTE:

"The best, most effective thing individuals can do to advance two strokes is to buy them from the OEMs that sell them and tell the dealers of other brands they aren't buying their bikes because they don't sell smokers. If the numbers add up, then more smokers will show up. If the numbers don't add up, then that's the only poll that matters"

This is absolutely correct..and if the racing rules are fairer it will happen.... All the bs and tangents aside, it boils down to we want fairer class structures to allow 2 strokes to be more competitive (because the survival of the 2 stroke is vital for the sport...and it has a better chance of surviving if there is a place somewhere in professional motocross for it).

We're not asking manufactures to start building 200's or bizzare random shit. Just saying that with all the bikes currently available it makes the most sense to put a 250 with a 250 as opposed to the current formula. Sure it isn't perfect. Some will love it...some will complain. But it's better.

Something should of been done 10 years ago.

Okay, but are you saying that people who can race 250 smokers in the 250 class now, which is everyone but the 300 or so guys max with pro license who want to race SX 250's or the 250 Nationals, are not buying a smoker because a pro can't race them?

If the OEM's are going to build smokers again, they're not just going to ramp it up for a handful of guys that want them in pro classes. That's going to be maybe 50 units at most. This has to be something driven from the consumer side, where people can race these bikes right now.
MX7MX
Posts
845
Joined
8/28/2007
Location
USA
1/13/2011 5:10pm
Here's what I don't understand, you guys bitched and whined for the to get the rules changed in the classes 99.99% of the people on this board race. Now that it is, it still isnt good enough for you. You want the pro's to race them now. However, I do very clearly remember all the people who hated on James Stewart, which was the majority of you, when he was still racing his KX250 2T against RC on his 450F and was running with him at nearly every race.

Now, you give Stewart, Dungey, and RV all factory 250T's to race in the 450 class and I would virtually guarantee you that those three would still finish top 3 almost every single race.

Weird though when you go to a track and see 250Fs still winning when so many people have supposedly switched to the 250T, if they were so superior, why do they still lose? The answer is simple, just like in the pro's, it only matters who's racing them.

Also, if you take a poll and look at the average age of the people who want the 2 stroke back, the vast majority by a huge margin is the older generation, those who have been on 2 strokes when thats all there was.

One last thing, you guys jump up and down about 9 pages and 250+ replies to this topic. Lets see, this is, or I would consider it to be, one of, if not the most popular motocross/SX website on the internet with who knows, thousands and thousands of members, yet a WHOPPING total of 250+ people replied. Do you find something wrong with that? So the manufacturers and the AMA is supposed to drop what they are doing, because 250+ people reply to this topic or some 2 stroke aimed Poll about what people prefer gets several hundred votes etc? REALLY? SERIOUSLY?
wpark89
Posts
1162
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA, USA
1/13/2011 5:12pm
Okay, but are you saying that people who can race 250 smokers in the 250 class now, which is everyone but the 300 or so guys...
Okay, but are you saying that people who can race 250 smokers in the 250 class now, which is everyone but the 300 or so guys max with pro license who want to race SX 250's or the 250 Nationals, are not buying a smoker because a pro can't race them?

If the OEM's are going to build smokers again, they're not just going to ramp it up for a handful of guys that want them in pro classes. That's going to be maybe 50 units at most. This has to be something driven from the consumer side, where people can race these bikes right now.
I'm saying that 2 strokes being active in Pro racing would lead to more of a demand for the 2 stroke by the people that yes, can actually already race them.

I understand that the movement has to come from the consumer side, and I believe that if classes are structured in pro racing to support the 2 stroke (instead of completely discourage it) it will snowball and create a 2 stroke wave with consumers...not to eliminate 250F's, but enough for both strokes to coexist and allow consumers to have a choice.

3D
Posts
937
Joined
5/1/2008
Location
Tamaqua, PA, USA
1/13/2011 5:50pm
I just hope this sx season title doesn't come down to a stalled bike. It's not huge, but it is another downfall of a 4 banger. A simple tip over could end up being a dnf.
wpark89
Posts
1162
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA, USA
1/13/2011 5:56pm
MX7MX

Here's what I don't understand, you guys bitched and whined for the to get the rules changed in the classes 99.99% of the people on this board race. Now that it is, it still isnt good enough for you. You want the pro's to race them now. However, I do very clearly remember all the people who hated on James Stewart, which was the majority of you, when he was still racing his KX250 2T against RC on his 450F and was running with him at nearly every race. RC was pretty much running away from him, James got close enough one weekend at Unadilla to land on him. You make it sound like they were dicing and going back and forth all summer.

Now, you give Stewart, Dungey, and RV all factory 250T's to race in the 450 class and I would virtually guarantee you that those three would still finish top 3 almost every single race.
Yep they would...and they'd do the same on 250F's in the 450 class. So what's you point? Johnny O'mara's 125 beat Dave Thorpe's 500 at Maggiora in '86.

Weird though when you go to a track and see 250Fs still winning when so many people have supposedly switched to the 250T, if they were so superior, why do they still lose? The answer is simple, just like in the pro's, it only matters who's racing them.
Exactly...so lets race 250's vs 250's because the 2 stroke isn't guaranteed a win. I woudn't say "so many people have switched" if there are 30 guys in the 250B class, I'd say I see about 5-7 250 2 strokes on average in my part of the country.

Also, if you take a poll and look at the average age of the people who want the 2 stroke back, the vast majority by a huge margin is the older generation, those who have been on 2 strokes when thats all there was. You're right, 16 year old rich kids who's parents pay for everything don't care. Guys like me who've raced since the 80's care. Kids who can never mow enough lawns to go racing care, the neighbor kid down the road with a blown up 250F that he can't afford to fix and will never have another dirt bike in his life...he cares..Local promoters with low entries, they care. Bike shops who used to sell 5 125's for every 1 250F they will sell this year...they care.
JB 19
Posts
4344
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH, USA
1/13/2011 6:05pm
DC wrote:
KaBoom, I don't make a paycheck at the nationals; I am in the magazine business. I work on the nationals because the nationals needed work, not...
KaBoom, I don't make a paycheck at the nationals; I am in the magazine business. I work on the nationals because the nationals needed work, not because I needed paid.

MX Sports runs 250cc motorcycles together locally and at Loretta Lynn's for a variety of reasons, including to help keep costs down for amateurs. I have absolutely nothing against two-strokes, but I do have a problem with blowing up the series and running off factory teams and factory jobs like we've seen in other forms of racing when rules did not mesh with the products offered by the OEMs.

And Themtroad, the AMA Motocross Series had better attendance and a vastly bigger TV audience than it has ever had in 2010, which was a down year for the economy. Appreciate the doom-and-gloom scenario you painted, but like AMA Supercross, which also utilizes the AMA rulebook we've done a pretty good job in attracting fans and sponsors and getting our sport on TV while other forms of professional racing have struggled.

DC
MX Sports
I'm someone who has followed road racing for years, and we only need to look at AMA pro road racing to see what happens when uninformed people make these "feel good" changes that ruin much of the professional side of the sport.

The last thing we need in this country is for the top guys to end up going to Europe to race because they can't make a living here.

I have said for 2 years that the guys who want to ride and race a 2 stroke can do that. Nobody is stopping them. The guys who race for a living would rather be on a 4 stroke anyway. Can't we just enjoy the LIVE racing on tv and next day coverage in HD?
Bret
Posts
831
Joined
8/10/2008
Location
Mission Viejo, CA, USA
1/13/2011 6:09pm
Four-stroke motocross bikes are prevalent today because of the "not-so-well-thought-out" displacement advantage given to them over two-stroke bikes. In a perfect world, the displacement advantage would have been much lower, resulting in a mix of two and four-stroke machines. As long as a 450cc four-stroke is considered equal to a 250cc two-stroke by the AMA, the factories will continue to produce 450cc four-stroke motocross bikes. Take away the advantage and things might change. Additionally, consumers could stop purchasing four-strokes and that would send quite a message to the factories. I seriously doubt either will happen though.
JB 19
Posts
4344
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH, USA
1/13/2011 6:10pm
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like to know what lawns those kids were mowing and where they were racing because I was a kid in the 80's. My mom and dad both had really good jobs and my racing took up most of their money so I find this lawn mowing thing tough to believe.

CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
1/13/2011 6:24pm
Not sure how the rest of the country works, but at most Texas amateur races, the 250T's race in the 450 class. I think the 250T/250F thing is only at AMA amateur races and there aren't many of those around this part of the country.
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
1/13/2011 6:30pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 7:06pm
JB 19 wrote:
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like...
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like to know what lawns those kids were mowing and where they were racing because I was a kid in the 80's. My mom and dad both had really good jobs and my racing took up most of their money so I find this lawn mowing thing tough to believe.

I'm one of those idiots. A kid could could easily buy a 125, or smaller, bike on lawn mowing money. I knew a lot of kids that did it. Racing is a different story. That took mom and dad money to do it on a regular basis. The manufacturers sold 1 million dirt bikes in 1979. Most of them weren't raced but the average local races in DFW often brought out 6-700 entries. Today the manufacturers sell less than 200,000 dirt bikes a year and local tracks are lucky to see 200 riders show up. There are many reasons why the sport has shrunk so much but I believe cost is the main one.
JB 19
Posts
4344
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH, USA
1/13/2011 6:47pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 6:48pm
JB 19 wrote:
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like...
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like to know what lawns those kids were mowing and where they were racing because I was a kid in the 80's. My mom and dad both had really good jobs and my racing took up most of their money so I find this lawn mowing thing tough to believe.

CamP wrote:
I'm one of those idiots. A kid could could easily buy a 125, or smaller, bike on lawn mowing money. I knew a lot of kids...
I'm one of those idiots. A kid could could easily buy a 125, or smaller, bike on lawn mowing money. I knew a lot of kids that did it. Racing is a different story. That took mom and dad money to do it on a regular basis. The manufacturers sold 1 million dirt bikes in 1979. Most of them weren't raced but the average local races in DFW often brought out 6-700 entries. Today the manufacturers sell less than 200,000 dirt bikes a year and local tracks are lucky to see 200 riders show up. There are many reasons why the sport has shrunk so much but I believe cost is the main one.
ok. You can still find 125's on craigslist for 600-1000$. If a kid just wants to go dirt bike riding, that hasn't changed.

There you go. http://columbus.craigslist.org/mcy/2097669330.html
Chili
Posts
813
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Winnipeg, CA
1/13/2011 6:47pm
No, I don't know what the answer is at the pro level. But I don't think the answer to saving the sport at this point in...
No, I don't know what the answer is at the pro level. But I don't think the answer to saving the sport at this point in time is to tell Davey he's a sell out unless he puts a rule in place the OEM's have said they don't want and tells them to shove it up their asses.



The answer for the 99.9% of us not constrained by pro mx rules is to buy a new smoker from one of the companies that is making them still and tell the dealers of the other brands in your town that you didn't buy that brand because they don't make the bike you want.
Tried to do just as you advise, couldn't get a 2011 250SX within 500+ miles of my home. Kid reluctantly ended up buying a 2006 KX250 with almost no time on it.

http://www.vitalmx.com/forums/MotoRelated,20/Vote-With-Your-Wallet,9977…
wpark89
Posts
1162
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA, USA
1/13/2011 6:51pm
mowing lawns doesn't have to mean mowing lawns...genius. It's a reference to having some sort of part time employment, wether it be weekend or after school that allows a teenage type the financial ability to participate in a hobby.

I actually did cut grass...and do odd jobs to pay for my racing. My parents played a role as well. But I was able to race....as were 10 other kids in school in my small town.

Now in that same small town guess how many kids currently race or have Motocross bikes.
Zero. That's zero bike sales at the shop, zero oil....zero boots...zero clutch plates.

I'm sick of hearing about growing the sport...blowing it up...our concern needs to be to make it stable and consistently as strong as it ever was. Pro Racing and the Amateur/Consumer/Sport side are different. A good TV package isn't an indication of how well "the sports" doing. It's there to sell Energy drinks...not bikes, oil, boots, or clutch plates.
That's the stuff that needs to be successful for the livlihood of the sport.

We really have a lot of different subjects going on here.
MX7MX
Posts
845
Joined
8/28/2007
Location
USA
1/13/2011 7:14pm
JB 19 wrote:
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like...
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like to know what lawns those kids were mowing and where they were racing because I was a kid in the 80's. My mom and dad both had really good jobs and my racing took up most of their money so I find this lawn mowing thing tough to believe.

CamP wrote:
I'm one of those idiots. A kid could could easily buy a 125, or smaller, bike on lawn mowing money. I knew a lot of kids...
I'm one of those idiots. A kid could could easily buy a 125, or smaller, bike on lawn mowing money. I knew a lot of kids that did it. Racing is a different story. That took mom and dad money to do it on a regular basis. The manufacturers sold 1 million dirt bikes in 1979. Most of them weren't raced but the average local races in DFW often brought out 6-700 entries. Today the manufacturers sell less than 200,000 dirt bikes a year and local tracks are lucky to see 200 riders show up. There are many reasons why the sport has shrunk so much but I believe cost is the main one.
So if we eliminated the 4 stroke, magically the sport would thrive abundantly and the economy would shift to perfect?
three9zero
Posts
1454
Joined
9/26/2010
Location
Kamloops B.C, CA
1/13/2011 7:18pm
I love the smell of burnt Castor oil, the next generation do not know what they missed...,. How about the sound was 40 500 two stokes dumping the clutch off the gate
I remember in the 80's having over 100 80cc bikes at local races.....
All gone, because of "THE MAN" and I do not mean Roger Decoster....
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
1/13/2011 7:24pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 7:25pm
MX7MX wrote:
So if we eliminated the 4 stroke, magically the sport would thrive abundantly and the economy would shift to perfect?
When the two stroke first killed the four stroke with lighter, cheaper and more powerful bikes, it was a major shot in the arm for the sport. I don't see why it wouldn't couldn't do it again. Quite often in life, less is more.
Indy mxer
Posts
1870
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL, USA
1/13/2011 7:27pm
No, I don't know what the answer is at the pro level. But I don't think the answer to saving the sport at this point in...
No, I don't know what the answer is at the pro level. But I don't think the answer to saving the sport at this point in time is to tell Davey he's a sell out unless he puts a rule in place the OEM's have said they don't want and tells them to shove it up their asses.



The answer for the 99.9% of us not constrained by pro mx rules is to buy a new smoker from one of the companies that is making them still and tell the dealers of the other brands in your town that you didn't buy that brand because they don't make the bike you want.
Great posts FTE.
I agree. If you want a 2 smoker go buy one.Vote with your wallet. You can even race against the 250 4 strokes if that turns you on.
All these guys want to bitch about 2 strokes, but won't go buy one. They're available.


Btw, I'm an old guy that rides a KX250f. I have no desire to go back to a 2 stroke, even though I can race it in the 250 class. As a matter of fact, the last race I was at, there was only 1 YZ250 there. Everything else was a 4T.
And, not all that many vet riders want a 2 smoker. As a matter of fact, I ride with quite few, none of them are wanting one.

As far as DC goes, he's done more positive things for mx in the last few years than I've seen done since I've been following mx. I think the future is bright.
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
1/13/2011 7:32pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 7:33pm
No, I don't know what the answer is at the pro level. But I don't think the answer to saving the sport at this point in...
No, I don't know what the answer is at the pro level. But I don't think the answer to saving the sport at this point in time is to tell Davey he's a sell out unless he puts a rule in place the OEM's have said they don't want and tells them to shove it up their asses.



The answer for the 99.9% of us not constrained by pro mx rules is to buy a new smoker from one of the companies that is making them still and tell the dealers of the other brands in your town that you didn't buy that brand because they don't make the bike you want.
Indy mxer wrote:
Great posts FTE. I agree. If you want a 2 smoker go buy one.Vote with your wallet. You can even race against the 250 4 strokes...
Great posts FTE.
I agree. If you want a 2 smoker go buy one.Vote with your wallet. You can even race against the 250 4 strokes if that turns you on.
All these guys want to bitch about 2 strokes, but won't go buy one. They're available.


Btw, I'm an old guy that rides a KX250f. I have no desire to go back to a 2 stroke, even though I can race it in the 250 class. As a matter of fact, the last race I was at, there was only 1 YZ250 there. Everything else was a 4T.
And, not all that many vet riders want a 2 smoker. As a matter of fact, I ride with quite few, none of them are wanting one.

As far as DC goes, he's done more positive things for mx in the last few years than I've seen done since I've been following mx. I think the future is bright.
This "vote with your wallet" bullshit is getting old. Do you guys ever visit your local dealerships? There aren't any full size two strokes on most sales floors because the supply of new two strokes in very limited and every one of them gets sold quickly. Most people aren't going to travel to another state because that's the only place that has a YZ250 or 250SX in stock.
TomZ
Posts
708
Joined
7/24/2008
Location
West Bloomfield, MI, USA
1/13/2011 7:44pm
I think we all know someone who has built some fantastic 2stroke, modern motocross machinery.
If AJ could be coerced into buiding some Service Honda 125's (or Kaws) ............
Well a guy is allowed to dream right ??
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13293
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
1/13/2011 7:45pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2011 7:46pm
Cam, I understand that smokers are hard to find brand new. By all means, if your KTM dealer tells you his allotment of 250SX, or 250/300XC's (maybe an even better bike) are gone, tell him you're not going to buy a bike from him because that's all you want.



I know dealers don't always have the ear of the OEMs and have a rough time of it. But if they have to sit on four bangers and people are telling them too bad you are losing a sale because you don't have a bike, maybe that'll start to get passed up the chain. A lot faster than hoping they'll read a lot of junk on a message board.



And if you find new one elsewhere or a used alternative, drive by his shop with to demonstrate the money he didn't get is real.



The notion that DC can cram a rule down the OEM's throat and that's suddenly going to (a) produce more two strokes on the showroom floor and (b) make pro racing golden rather than it's supposed suckiness now seems to me - just to me - a lot less viable course of action.



Please no one think I'm against smokers, I just like to live in the land of the possible when I try to think of solutions. The fact that entities like the OEM's have the power to dictate what they build and whether they'll race can be a fact whether I like it or not.
wpark89
Posts
1162
Joined
12/9/2009
Location
Mattawa, WA, USA
1/13/2011 7:51pm
MX7MX wrote:
So if we eliminated the 4 stroke, magically the sport would thrive abundantly and the economy would shift to perfect?
Man...nobody is saying ELIMINATE 4 strokes. We are saying create a more equal playing field than the one we have now...and yes, 2 strokes could potentially improve the motocross economy. Shift to perfect...No. Have more of a potential to improve...yes.

I don't know of any 2 stroke that ever broke down to the extent that a guy had to part it out...yet I know of heaps of 4 strokes that are only a few years old and are good for nothing but ebay parts.



mtnr
Posts
289
Joined
3/29/2010
Location
., ID, USA
1/13/2011 8:04pm
JB 19 wrote:
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like...
And for the idiots who are saying that back in the 80's a kid could mow lawns and afford to go racing.....??? I would sure like to know what lawns those kids were mowing and where they were racing because I was a kid in the 80's. My mom and dad both had really good jobs and my racing took up most of their money so I find this lawn mowing thing tough to believe.

CamP wrote:
I'm one of those idiots. A kid could could easily buy a 125, or smaller, bike on lawn mowing money. I knew a lot of kids...
I'm one of those idiots. A kid could could easily buy a 125, or smaller, bike on lawn mowing money. I knew a lot of kids that did it. Racing is a different story. That took mom and dad money to do it on a regular basis. The manufacturers sold 1 million dirt bikes in 1979. Most of them weren't raced but the average local races in DFW often brought out 6-700 entries. Today the manufacturers sell less than 200,000 dirt bikes a year and local tracks are lucky to see 200 riders show up. There are many reasons why the sport has shrunk so much but I believe cost is the main one.
JB 19 wrote:
ok. You can still find 125's on craigslist for 600-1000$. If a kid just wants to go dirt bike riding, that hasn't changed. There you go...
ok. You can still find 125's on craigslist for 600-1000$. If a kid just wants to go dirt bike riding, that hasn't changed.

There you go. http://columbus.craigslist.org/mcy/2097669330.html
Not that it matters....... but. Here is another idiot that mowed lawns and payed for 80's thru 490's from 78 to 83 racing twice a week often in 6-8 states over the course of the season from NC to New York including many times at Highpoint where Daveys parents put on the races. Two stroke bikes and parts back then where cheap, so was gas. Carry on.....

Post a reply to: Jody, MXA, Two Strokes and Matthes

The Latest